las pruebas pueden fallar

We' re here this Monday, April 1. We' re starting a month. As I said, in everything to see a little while ago, but welcome to this new month, month four of this year, two thousand twenty- four. That' s magic. Det' s meagc or Doctor amen Hello, how about good night, because very happy to be here again. It' s good that my chair was kept in place, because I was already afraid. That' s not true. And the other thing to say is lupita about that it' s already month four that fast. I

can only say one thing. I think I' m going to start soaking the cod already to finish in time to shred. It' s going too fast. Welcome, Efra Baby, backward merculo girls. How were you news which signposts? Leo read the company. How they were motitos for Lupito and me, because the fires and the ones there that we' re going to be quiet, we' re not going to feel it. Oh, good bless God, good thing you' re telling me Glory to God. There are three of us, so, yes, well, we are going to

start this day today, this Monday, first of April. I think what we need to do right now is a thorough analysis of what we' re seeing. It' s very important. I' ll open it. I made this film in the previous recommendation program and recommended it because it' s really imperative that everyone see it for the times we live in. It' s a thousand nine hundred and thirteen. Two thousand thirteen, The Hunt The Hunt. I could see it on Apple TV. The RENT is a Danish

Swedish film. This Danish Swedish film talks about a Kinder teacher who, because he has many friends, is very loved by his community, is very respected by the children, has a great relationship with all his Kinde students and has one. There' s a little girl who' s the daughter of her best friend. He realizes that his best friend' s marriage lives in litigation

and then he says hey, I support you with your little girl. Then she took her to school and so on, the little girl looking for this father figure that gives her peace, for she writes a letter with a little heart. Well, she doesn' t describe, because she' s barely learning to write, but she does put him in it about his name and gives him a little heart and he, of course, says no, because you can' t give it to me. Not because it' s not

right. One doesn' t explain to him that way, but in understanding that his five- or six- year- old student says thank you, but you can' t give this to me, give it to one of your classmates. That' s what he says. The little girl feels totally betrayed by the teacher who has planted the personality of the understanding and loving father who will take care of her and then decides to say. On the other hand, in those days, I repeat, parents have family problems and have

a teenage child. In the same days that this happens, the teenage son teaches his sister on an iPad very quickly. Look, look, this is the member of a man with the words that correspond to the And then the little girl, when she' s disappointed with her dad' s friend who at the same time her teacher says I' m angry with Lucas, because Lucas taught me his member and described it, but she' s repeating the words of her teenage brother. The principal takes what the child says very seriously.

They send for a special and the specialist induces and deduces the girl At some point, when he sees that Lucas his teacher is having such a hard time, he tells his dad and his mom he first tells his mom he didn' t do anything to me. I said nonsense and the mom says no. No. No. The thing is, you don' t want to remember. When you interview the specialist, the girl asks and she says well, I don' t remember, but I didn' t really do

anything to her. So, then, what you see is how this man who is innocent is separated from his post, has only the absolute trust of his son, of his son who is also a teenager and, of course, of the father, of the godfather, of his son, also that he is a relative of his with two other friends, who are the only

ones who remain unconditional and believe in him. But everyone else, the whole Community closes its doors and let you see how in a small, small community, the truth can be distorted so much and how you can exist the swelling and discrediting of a person who is innocent. In the end, the end is the end, because I don' t know if I should tell them. It' s a movie that was made in two thousand thirteen. Anyway, but what the film makes clear is that this disparagement is like a marked

footprint. It remains as a stigma in people, even if they are innocent and it is shown that they are innocent and even if all come out, acquitted, lying, leaves it engraved something on him and then it will eventually cost him to recover. But the film ends a year later. The film is called The Hunt or the Hunt, but I wanted to comment on it as a principle, I repeat in another show I mentioned it as a movie recommendation that I recommend to you as an analysis of what we are living in

many, many times and with many characters. Elisabethruman doesn' t follow the end. I mean, it' s a story you' ll see, because it' s the development of a social lynching, of disparagement. When a person is damaged in its integrity in a fact he did not commit and that is the start of the film. I' m not telling you that ' s how the movie starts. The approach is his work with children and the film starts When this girl says she was five years old, she accuses

him of having done things without measuring the consequences. I think the first thing is that we learn to measure it. How can you consider that you don ' t mean that you lie? Eh it means that up to a certain age children learn with symbolism and, besides, they are very prone to fantasy and to put things together. It doesn' t mean they' re lying.

It means that his thought is still a little fanciful and until later it will be the age from the seven years that begins, which is when the primary begins that thought evolves and cognitive proxies are others, but I think it is very important, because that happens sometimes in these societies. It is what we are seeing that then the truth is confused with these media lynchings. When someone just saw him with Calimbauta, I pass on the word, we just

met Kalimba, who accuses him and we said it on Friday. A woman comes out at the age of nineteen, says I am thirty- two, but at the age of nineteen she abused me and I stayed a story ago and Calimbo salt and she says I' m tired of getting dirty in my

image and this was not true. And anyway, I don' t know how you guys see it, because in the end, Kalimba, I hope you can contain this lynching, but of many people we' ve seen these half- truths stay or stupid, because personally I can say it, I mean, I dare say it. Mr Infante, Gustavo Adolfo Infantes, has dedicated himself to defaming me and I have received messages that correspond to the stupidities he has told him that they are lies, which are clearly lies. However,

people do. People do it without knowing for the ultimate purpose of harming the other person and the image of another person, doctor, please note that while I was listening to you talk about this movie I haven' t seen him, but believe me I have a lot of interest. Finishing the program, I will surely look for it because, like you, I was not here on Friday I was out being a very beautiful short trip, very rewarding

in a very beautiful place in the Mexican Republic. But what a coincidence that Lupita Efraín, when listening to you, reminded me of what a person, a family member, who is a very prepared woman, who works in special education, told me about how she at this very moment in her life, also has a certain responsibility in groups of specialists in special education, with a career in psychology and another has given me and others dedicated for many years to

this situation of inclusion of people with different abilities, cognitively speaking in regular schools. And he was just telling me about a person who' s lived something like what you just told me, but this just happened. He is a colleague who is dedicated to helping to integrate children, especially those with autism spectrum

disorders into regular education. And just something similar has happened where there is a confusion in one of these children who also have difficulty communicating and right now is having a terrible time with this accusation is already in prison. The person and the entire group of fellow teachers who know him and who consider that this did not happen are dismayed and without knowing what to do. But what we were discussing was that no one is going to want to even carry out this kind

of work. Nobody' s gonna want to do it anymore. For the same reason, because it is already a risk to your integrity, because imagine yourself not, then it hurts me deeply. I' m very concerned and I' m also concerned about what we say over and over here. Ephraim constantly points out how the truth of one so possible victim is then distorted by this other situation. Then you have to be very responsible, very delicate. I was telling this person what barbarity, that is, there should be cameras

in all these schools. We' re not talking about public schools. We ' re talking about schools, some of them. She told me they are almost rural, because they are like in the periphery, between the rural and the urban let' s say and where with which there will be cameras everywhere, so that it is monitored and you can verify what happens or does not happen in those classrooms so important the bad that does happen as important what does

not. So it' s very painful, very distressing. I find it horrible and I saw them for moments, I saw them on Friday talking about this kalimba issue. I did find it very important to take that part back. Not to say that this woman who shows up with her video is affected, yes, she looks like something' s wrong with her. But they also said to calm him down from the face. That' s what they

said and that' s what it was then. In that sense it seems good, good that he goes out to Defenderse also reminded me very much at the time, when Michael Jackson did his thing regardless of what everyone believes, he is no longer there, but when he made this video and this song from The Man in the my not- so- like mistake. When he said I' m no longer going to water my head like in the past to supposedly invite a scandal that, anyway, happened and now I' m

here. So from that point of view, I would start by saying how good it is that kalimb is going, because he has given his face and of course you know, because it is also ex- emphasis that in the case of Michael Jackson, who to this day, even after his death, continues to point out him as an austere victim. The victims and the alleged victims said years later, he never did anything to me and my parents forced

me to confess. That' s disparagement and social swelling. When the lord wanted to prove that he was innocent in every way and in the end, years later, when he is no longer there, the alleged victims go out to say it was Ephraim' s lie, specifically in the case of Kalimba, because just that Calimba has gone out to say that they investigate me.

I want to clear my name. I mean, he left us perplexed and with his mouth he kept quiet at least to me because he went out to give his face and he was thanked, not then, because then he has other dyes. When he goes out and says yes, that is to say that neither who knows will always remain in doubt. Because, unfortunately, there ' s always going to be doubt. And on the weekend I left thinking that once in a class they called him a teacher is not that the paradigms

that humanity is breaking. And so I' d say and when that paradigm is over, it' s going to see another, there' s going to be another, there' s going to be another. No, and I kept thinking about the pendulum. Not so long ago the abusers were protected. Everybody shut up. Nobody say anything. And now for everything we' re going to believe, let' s say yes, you don' t

even want to investigate anymore, nothing else because they said yes. Let' s just get a box of witches and end up with all the heads and

see if you can. We do not need, as a society and especially in a country like Mexico, to understand the right to the person, to his presumed exact innocence, which is so important and so we all have to fight, because we have the case so many things that we have seen so rare, because we are not giving as a society, we are so angry for so long of unjust things that then someone says he is guilty and everyone, to save us and wash our hands, we say he is guilty.

Of course she said he' s guilty. Then everyone because look at you girls, too. That' s what I was thinking we talked about here

on Petit Committee of the Three to socially imbue. I have to believe that truth because if not, if I question the truth that are socially forcing me to believe I am already wrong and I think that also an issue that we have to start to question very much the question and fulfills us of the people and also the revenges and everything that we have seen around these cases is something very serious and socially. Yeah, I think we need to start doing something.

I loved what Kalimba said, starting work, someone being unfairly accused uploads a video, gives a statement to a magazine, is investigated. It fascinated me. The truth is, Carinma fell into my mouth. I mean, really and I mean it with all the straw, it' s not like I think we kept the doubt, we didn' t even say it was the fault of what I moment simply has to go out and calin Basal and he says now I already have a family. I may have made a lot, or I don' t even say I made mistakes a family and they

want to hurt me and they want to damage my career. There are people like that apparently and I also heard that this woman who said she was thirty - two years old already was nineteen, her Tiktok account disappeared. No one finds her anymore, she didn' t give her face anymore, and that ' s what happened to the grub case. What happened to this one, Mrs ura Zapata? What happened to this woman? They go to social media where they monetize, where you can maybe win that video is not monetized,

but you can gain enough fame to eventually monetize elsewhere. And then, but then, a gossip like that makes me very famous. I pull people, and then I can accuse Mr Kalimba, because as he already has a little lionarcito in the past And so on, why not, how good that he comes out, stops at the press, talks to the press and says no. I' m here to defend myself. I' m not, I ' m not guilty and I' m here to separate this and have them

look. It turns out to be very much a contradiction here, that is, not contradictory, but there is one thing that becomes very delicate, because there will be perpetrators who are 100% perpetrators and there will be others who are not perpetrators in any way. So when you make organizations I insist and forgive you that you always bring this case. But it' s the only case I know, as Sacha alzocohol has said convicted in two courts, is the only case I know, which is that of Mr Luis de Llano.

Well, we' ll be able to say that he' s been found guilty and he' s been charged and it' s over, but of all the others. But it is not the least suitable to make an organization to defend men who have been accused. Not because he has been tested and tested and in the light of all, for he was guilty. But in this case, it is very difficult. It' s like this little girl, I insist, it' s not the time. It is not the time, because we have said so, a woman can take fifty years to

denounce a bully or. It may take fifteen minutes or it may never take you or your whole life not to do so, it is not the time in which you report it, it is the anonymous way in which you do it, it disappears, because if you have denounced it in Tiktok, then go to the prosecutor' s office and get up or to the prosecutor' s office and file one on your complaint. I don' t suppose I

' m clear and also the authorities. Then the job will be to take all those elements from whom he accuses and also to take all the elements of the accused when he defends himself and when he proves his own and with all that giving him the proper weight, for to reach the just conclusion that we all expect. And it' s not like Ephraim said, and I give that word, this pendulum, too. Not all against, against, against?

All in favor, all on one side, all on the other, turning the boat, bowing, not but putting everything in place and preparing a good investigation. What should always be done. And this subject that really, if someone lies on something so serious or exaggerated statement or something like that, they take up the matter, because yes, it can' t be possible that we' re seeing that the cases are replicating no and that it' s already like a threat. I don' t mean this or this option

or this option doesn' t and I have you in my hands. I mean, it' s not about that, because then, sometime and I don' t know maybe I' m going to take on bad terms, but a friend told me, far from starting to become feminists, we became drunk. No and then this becomes a tear, because we are all against all and the law of the heel And then, as you did to me,

I do to you and then they turn revenge. And I do believe that revenge, since it' s the eight- year- old boy, kills the poison anyway, I don' t mean, he doesn' t feel anything. Justice is what we have to seek. And we' re not seeing justice. We' re seeing cases of lynching girl payback, because that' s what we can talk about Friday, sorry. But I also wanted to pick up Ahorita, because Efrain says my mouth fell Kalinda, I

think very, very, very cute on your part. You can say it like that, but the truth is, what I saw from you is that I did say that you said that he would have to face it and that he gave it well. It wasn' t like I said,' cause if you' d said, and I' m sure he won' t face it, then yes, but he says I stood up and gave it. But besides, it seemed very emphatic to me that you commented that when

he says I am a family father, I am not being discredited. I ' ve got my kids not worth it, because it' s also true. That' s not the argument you' re defending yourself against an accusation. So because you' re going to be really dad today and really cute and whatever you want. But if you did something wrong, done, done that is, then that wasn' t the argument, but the argument is here I' m asking you to investigate it very well and that' s

the correct and expected argument nothing more. That' s all, but it wasn' t the other one but I' m good people right now and I take care of my that wasn' t, but he straightened out his way and to this day, so soon, I think that' s the best I could have done what he' s doing now. No, and I' m going to tell you something in peace that I think we' re all three here because we like to look for sleeves on the vest. So I was already watching the interview with Kalimba, and then the lawyer and

Kalimba and then they said about this case of Melisa. They remained silent, they said no. We' ll see about this later, that is, sometimes the prints of the past or when you kill a dog, you become the dog killer. The dogs and unfortunately, the traces of our past are going to haunt us many times and I think the most notice I keep thinking

the smartest. If you made a mistake in the past, it' s going to be when it' s that mistake or go out and tell them if I was wrong, because if these things don' t happen, the mistake is going to chase you. He' s going to chase you and he' s going to come back in another form, he' s going to magnify and parasol we believe in karma, because he' s going to bring it back seven times until he learns the lesson. So I did and I wanted to feel that, because it did come out that nice to take

a look at that subject. But the Melisa issue didn' t say anything. He let it be seen that they were seeing whether or not they were going to reach an agreement. Then that makes me think. I mean, maybe this case isn' t real, but there may be others who do, and unfortunately you would have to face up to all the cases exactly.

But, well, it' s also good that he defends himself, because it' s like climbing up the boat, not that he' s going to circulate to the front and once and to the other, I climb here, but well he brings a lawyer. It was clear, he showed up and that' s it. There is no order of anything against him, despite what they had said. There' s no order against it because that ' s where it came up and that' s it. On the other hand, last week, which we had not even put on the cover of

the show, this note emerged again with respect to Mr Patricio Cabezote. I find this case worrying again. I insist on the way things are taken and the way things are done. First, the big wedding is first announced and it is announced that the big wedding between Patricio cabezut and now shoe and then how beautiful, what a father. Then it turns out that she wants to divorce and then it turns out that she sues because, then, there is no pension, because she doesn' t give me money. And we'

re seeing that publicly in the notes. No money, no money, give me forty- one cents or forty. Feels like that, pulled out a ridiculous thing he published a day. I mean, I wasn' t giving him anything, but the other man, because he had no money, so whatever, uh, I don' t care if he had money or not. The case is that the origin of this whole lawsuit is a divorce and

the pension later turns out. This has happened, for two thousand and sixteen thousand and twenty, seems to me two thousand and twenty pandemics, and then we see two thousand and twenty. Something like a report of family violence.

We see later and we present her in this program the crying of the lady crying because the police had arrived, they had already broken the sheets of her house to enter for the girls, because she had not fulfilled two years with the visits she had to make, that is, the girls had to see her dad and for two years she had not met the boys, with the girls and then, because she had to comply with that order of the judge. Not in those two years there was no more complaint than domestic violence.

That' s all there was. And the pension, after the judge orders this question of breaking into the house so that the girls can see their father, then accuses him of abuse when in two and a half years the girls have not seen their parents in a way otherwise irresponsible, otherwise absurd. I see today morning in the first- hand morning. First I saw him in joy with Flor Rubio and Ricardo Casares, who were quite prudent to mention this

note and stressed over and over again. You have to play this very carefully. You have to touch this with tweezers. It was Flor' s words of shock GoF pence, which is fine, because we must all have learned that by now. You have to treat them like this with tweezers and then they treat it, they pose it, that is, they present it as it should be informative, but with care. Chain three on this man' s show. It' s good. The sun rises with Johanna be gaviestrona

Maria Alvarado and the other person. Turns out they present the reporter who took out the note on Friday, who is a very respectable reporter, does a great job on red note. He' s a reporter who knows everything that ' s going on in Mexico City. Carlos Jiménez, in his area is Juan Camanei. Then he gets it, they give them the authority to say whether it was true or not, and then they can argue there both the

east driver and Carlos Jiménez to say that the girls had been tested. I don' t know what, and then that meant he was guilty, because the proof had thrown, because the proof had said. When everyone we' ve tested, everyone we' ve done batteries, then we know they'

re all manipulable. And two girls who haven' t seen their father for two and a half years in the hands of a mom who in the audios heard that she was saying, well, to see what I accuse you of seeing what I demand of you, because I still don' t know what I' m going to sue you for. They may well have been manipulated. I' m not saying it is, but of course, they may

have been manipulated. Two and a half years without seeing the father told them about this movie where there' s a girl who has a fantasy, where the mom tells her what' s going on is that you don' t remember. But if it happened to you and you put it, it did happen to me, I don' t remember. That' s just the way it is. No and then I insist Mr Carlos mén is an expert in what he does, but he is not an expert in mental health,

he is not an expert or in dealing with minors. It is not a clear expert and, first of all, this whole sequence that you relate of the accusations and of these facts how they have occurred, for it is erratic. No, I mean, they start at least serious and still not long ago. This lady goes out to cry without tears saying that they are wanting to force the girls to see the dad and that she won' t allow it because she feels terrified and in danger, like saying the authority is not

giving my place to me or I don' t believe myself. And then it turns out that always yes, the authority has already turned an arrest warrant against this gentleman because it turns out that they have already found that he has had this behavior failed and then the reporter you mention say yes, well, points out that he has been tested, which is called the project antennas that has to do with a virtual doll that talks with the children and others that

the truth, with all the respect for the doctor specialist in clinical psychology who develops it seems to me very stupid. And, moreover, very much from the time we live, where children communicate very well with everything that has to do with virtual issues and so on, but that obeys the same principle of Melani Cline. When you develop this play therapy with children through dolls carts and trains that describe the mental world of the little ones, it has nothing to

do with it. But they' re part of how you said Lupita a moment ago, they' re part of what' s known as test batteries. Unfortunately, there is no proof that we already know a whole truth with it, and there is no proof that is infallible, let alone that is not manipulable. There are three conditions, that is, tests are part of a battery. Number two is fallible so they are part of a battery, because the other tests can yield other results that add up to a conclusion.

And three, yes, they are all manipulable. Then there is no such thing as, like other tests, like a blood test that, perhaps does give us a more accurate data of something sadly in psychology matters. It' s not like that. Not then it seems to be more than talking about it being done in a particular way. No, then, that' s where you start to have other doubts, too. Sometimes the test where they

did to him as they did to him. And then how is it that then the prosecution does, takes it as good and then decides to turn an arrest warrant. That makes a world of other doubts. And here, right now, I give you the word defrain, sorry. But here we have to underline, and that is why I mentioned the film that I told you at the beginning that because of this kind of imprudent, partial comments for all partial lights, wanting to be the Plane and Sabia, they know but do

not know the whole thing. But that' s where social swelling is sown, that' s where it gets lynched, because, in addition, it ' s imprudence and unfortunately, because these kind of people ignorant of certain issues are the ones who have the power of a microphone that ends and ruins entire lives, Ephraim, then it' s first of all. Melisa stole all my paragraph because I pointed out the three things I did. I' ll

give you another order. Yes, but it is said Carolina Amaral says today Jorge Carvajal showed a role where corruption is pointed to the judge in the Cabezuth case. Thank you, Jorge Carvajal. He always has all the data, but well, he does have the other real data, the other real data. It' s very strong. I think he likes Volfo a san and what is a battery weighs and the other sign is surely a great journalist. But I was watching the show and I was very outraged. I said how

dare you. I mean, well, I don' t even know that that' s an expert or that' s really saying no. Yeah, sure, there' s the truth, and look at you, he' s gonna tell you one thing. A mel says the batteries are not infallible, because they do not because they give quantitative qualitative data. Then you can. And even a quantitative battery, one that takes your blood or takes your blood, can also be altered. Then there' s nothing infallible. That

' s all there is to it. That' s why they' re not long and you can' t go out after an interview on a little show and point out people to destroy life just like that. For real rating we have to worry as a society. And this isn' t for Gustavo Adolfo, it' s for whoever. We really have to be very careful about what we say and how you said it because it really destroys a person ' s life just by making you the one you know a lot, when you don' t even know it' s a battery, or how a

battery works, how a test is done how to tune in. You have no idea and you go out and say you' re there, but you ' re almost sure and you cut your head off because it' s no. Mr Carlos Jiménez said it was infallible. See says healthy and she said the test was infallible. There is no infallible proof. Write to Mr Carlos Jiménez that there is no infallible proof, There is not even a people.

The doctor who develops it is a specialist in clinical bpsychology. It seems to me that her surname herself says that she is very proud and pleased to have managed to develop that diagnostic instrument, because, she says me, they say much more, that is, the children say much more when they talk to him pretty, this of what they would talk to me about, because of course with an adult person that sometimes perceives you threatening, the child opens less

and opens up more with this virtual character, which is like very friendly and very friendly. Of course it opens the child I tell you how in the clin times it opened with the little monkey you gave representing I don' t know who and with the little trains. I mean, that' s the world you said about the child' s fantasy, where he thinks symbolically and expresses himself symbolically. But the one who speaks more doesn' t mean that already. That' s why what you understand or what you take as a

specialist. He' s either faithful or loyal or because you don' t understand, I mean, and he' s telling me that it' s probably not, it' s not that easy. Unfortunately, because it was wonderful that we had that infallible test, that it was applied and that' s it. It' s not like that. That' s not exactly Ephraim, because because we see this is something, it' s basic.

When we' ve been watching each other, we' re not 100% we' re nobody, I mean, that' s something that I think in the psych books is what I think tells you no, I mean, anyone who' s been observed is going to try to look nicer, nicer. So we don' t know what' s going on with this antenna project, that is. And also, the theme is that we have to emphasize it that they took it privately, that whenever they take it to a

private. It makes me suspicious of very rare things, because we have seen, unfortunately, that here, in a clinical way, in whatever area, the people who dedicate themselves to this suddenly for a few pesos are sold. That' s the reality. So, unfortunately, we have to wait for justice, real justice, to do justice and we have to continue to handle the guilty as presumed innocent. It is, indeed, very worrying that this gentleman comes out to say infallible, infallible, of course, but he compels

him. The problem is how many people follow him and believe them. Yes, they believe them, that is because I don' t care if I say what I want or what I want or I' m here working every day and people know me And although, then, I, it' s me and I know who I am. The problem is, he' s ruined here. It' s ruining his life because if it' s actually proven that he' s stubborn, he' s innocent in whatever it is, whatever it is, they pointed it out, already, you said it

on the national chain and you pointed it out and you said it. This battery is and people who have not studied, because not everyone has to have studied, because there will be mathematicians, biologists, merchants, thousand trades in all mankind. You don' t have to know that the test isn' t infallible. Not everyone has to know. So you, a lot of people watch the news and believe what they say. I read a newspaper and

believe what they say. Well, here too, because if it' s the super reporter and the man is the driver and everything doesn' t, then yes, before they know no, because they don' t know exactly. There are cases that need to be dealt with and all cases with presumption of innocence, especially when there is so much of a rare thing. No, I don' t. So look how nice what he says about vikina is to send all those who don' t know how batteries are handled in

psychology to study on the subject. As a psychology student, or I' m outraged that you talk to the fool because Paola forgives. But he makes a little joke. It says a battery. It' s not what you put on the appliances to make them work. Well, it' s good. The two things have been for the following reason, it' s just

lupita. No one has an obligation to know this, but if we are already going to talk about it and we are going to have it in front of us, then we are going to inform ourselves a little bit and they are called batteries for the simple and simple reason that they are composed of several

elements. That' s why, because it' s not a thing, that is, it' s not like the drums you play, because of music, which has dishes, but which has this drum, but which has Mira Nisei out what they' re called, because of those I don' t know about musical drums, but that means, they' re several elements that make it up. That' s why they call themselves that. That ' s why it' s not a psychological test. He revealed that such a thing is not a battery of tests, because they are several tests that

come together to achieve, as to know some result. They don' t call that exact. Look Juani also tells us it is a complicated job to perform a psychological diagnosis and we still have to be checking every six, three

or six months exactly who. But what happens in the film is a great misinformation and what a person says, a director with a confused girl, who then says good, always not good, because always, because you ruin the life of an Ephraim character is that an angry, uninformed society that would not have to know this can follow characters like this man who from nothing point out

and destroy his life. And I think that' s what we really need to question, question, question us a lot, because, as a society, why we' re so angry. I insist because this reflects a social anger. And then, as there' s already a person who' s

getting hurt. I hope I said it well and I am the champion of justice and I have the infallible place and as we are all looking for infallible answers because we are in a social moment that we feel lost, because there are events like last week in Taxco and all that, because of course we are so angry that we are going to look. Whoever tells us here is here. I have the public and authentic truth, and that is very serious, because it is the utilitarian of a society that is sick. And that

' s very sad. Watch out for those opinion leaders. I got angry again Look, says Alesandra Lombardi. In one program they commented that the test showed images. That' s where I doubt they could tell the truth.

As Luis says more than two years, exactly, because you have had two years ago without seeing the father ignore the age, but I am almost sure that very small girls under ten years of age or so, of course, that it is very easy to alienate them and especially the mother and especially the mother when in interviews she has declared that I will do the impossible because my daughters do not see their father again, to see what I demand of you. But my lawyers will open up what I' m asking you to forgive

me. And although and I' m going to tell you I trust and hope that justice is always exactly that justice. But even though there are cases tried, we have seen and here we were mentioned a short while ago the little thumb actor that for a long time after rather for twenty years after spending in prison, the daughter goes out to say it was a lie. My mom made me. The case of Jorge Labat, who was accused by his

son, ran out of work and in the end is not true. It wasn' t true, because everyone knows it' s a very serious and accurate crime. And I got nothing. There' s a movie I think we' ve already mentioned here another film as well as that great one, but I don' t remember. A man forgive me. If I remember, then I put it in the comments, because a lot of people also

have this fantasy about the hypnosis process. They ask me a lot. Listen you don' t do hypnosis, because with that we can get the truth out, because what you don' t think either, I mean you can also manipulate through hypnosis, or hypnosis can reveal with unconscious having, already manipulated as well. So this movie is great because it' s a woman who ' s accusing Dad who' s also a church pastor, of having abused her. The star actress, I think she' s Natalie Portman. I

don' t remember there, but good. The point is she says the unknown. Ign I know it already came out that yes and then the person who is noticing him, who is still engaged in investigating more in this woman ' s mind, comes to the conclusion that it did not happen. I mean, it' s not that easy to see exactly It' s not. I think he' s very smart. This says hi guys. I think we, as an audience. We also have a responsibility to observe who

we give power and credibility by following people. It is not, therefore, because it is, or at least it is well. Listen who you want, but you have to know, discern in what they are telling you and know that maybe it takes a little bit of There' s one thing that ' s called publishing, because one thing that I give you the information that allimba went and showed up at the prosecution and went out and declared he was innocent. And another thing I tell you, ah, but you know what.

His hands were nervous and his sweat dropped a drop from here. Looks to me like he turned over there. That' s a sign that you don' t. That is publishing, reporting, that is, the facts point this happened. What happened to the Hoffman case. What we saw, then, a statement in magazine, an audio of a girl saying do not manipulate me the intervention. Really, what we saw, what we saw, that is, what makes Jorge carvajar present them. These are evidence, period,

or not. I' m not speculating, I' m not speculating, I' m not speculating, I' m not speculating. No. It is to present the facts what is and good and to put together a better, better truth that can be. You can hear whoever you want. What' s the name of the movie that recommends Lupita goes to them and the image goes to them. That' s where it' s called. I leave the bar and leave the h- zero so they don' t see it, but I' m being shot. There it is called The

Hunt. This actor is very famous and is an excellent, excellent actor. They' re going to like her a lot and see her because she' s worth it, even good enough. There are others that the post truth that is a documentary that is seems to me in what was chpal that is now max. There are many movies the doubt also mentioned to me that it is also a super delicate case. Says Mira, if I may speak,

says Kalimba, he is innocent. The problem is that they took it from their pig and want money to hang from their image, because that is also very possible. No, it will have to be seen and investigated as it should now be. The woman is coming out good, the recent mother who ' s in her video accusing, because she' s gone. Then I don' t know, I don' t know what' s going to

happen. Don' t look at me Something very curious happened to me with a friend who' s an archeologist, and then they accused one of their colleagues of harassment. Not then all archaeologists said already. No one wants the archaeologist and my friend said no. I trust him, box he didn'

t do it, and that' s how it happened to me. About five or six years passed and the one who put it went out to say he was only very angry, accurate and very strong, because he ran out of work, he ran out of friendships, that the boy was left alone and then the goat that accused him. Well, well, it was a mistake. Yes, nothing else was here, I mean he really hears it ' s that the one he points to is the one they should punish, the one they point to just no yes, and that' s what he

was going to, that' s what he was saying socially. It made me think if anyone' s accusing me unfairly. I think so. I would have to have a sanction, because it is not possible that something because I say it as far as I tell each program, but it is that they are banalizing something very serious, that is, they are taking it to a very dark place, really, because it is something very serious and they

are using it for revenge in a perverse way. Another word, perverse to think that a person can put in that place his children and some children to get revenge on another adult. It makes me very perverted and the person who is doing it should be judged legally and see what' s going on with his head. And that' s the problem, too. You just told him where they' re putting their kids. That' s, that' s what' s important in this case, in the calimba case. Okay.

We are talking about women who claim to have been very young when it happened, but already in adulthood and today in the then even more adult. But well, grown- up, older. But in the case of problems that are little girls, they are exactly little girls who are right now in the middle of all this discussion. Fortunately, because I don' t think we know them, we haven' t seen them, not anything, but at some point these girls will grow up and bring on themselves this whole story,

not whatever it ends up, as it unfolds. At the end of the day, they' re in the middle of all this. Not then, that' s the serious thing to see. I want to be cleared up. This says Guadeloupe, Prudentius is no longer in the video and you lynching to Calimbia on Friday. How badly they did. If we lynch him on Friday, I ask the public, yes, I don' t think

I see Druper prudencio. I was public that day and what I saw and heard was that it wasn' t. And I said it a moment ago, making a summary of the program, that I saw from my colleagues that the point of defence was not. I' m a family father now. Don' t go accusing me of ugly things when I wasn' t, that that wasn' t a defense argument to say that you' re already very cute and good out there wasn' t, but that it was very important to face it. Today we' re saying he already gave it and

that' s fine and accurate. What we said was that, that is, whatever you are very good person, today does not erase what you have done in the past. That and the kids holding the ones we' re holding now that the accusation they' re making to you is true or not, because something else. Calimba did what he had to do was with his lawyer who had already spoken to his lawyer that unlike they had said there was

a warrant and so on, because there is no lawyer son. This comes from a year ago with this person who mentioned Ephraim, who I don' t know, and then this new one comes out, this new accusation of a girl. Or, well, he' s acting pretty good. Or if it was one I don' t know, but then we said out of the face and Efrain gave it, and he gave his face for the current subject, because he didn' t want to talk about the other then what your name is on Friday. We didn' t blow up Calima.

We said it was the face. I insist, and that' s what I' m holding. I' m in my personal capacity. He looked forward to Friday' s theme, the video, the other guy' s tiktoker didn' t want to talk, and he said we' ll come to an agreement. So that is, some cases may be true and others may not. And unfortunately, I insist on what I said earlier and I say it and I hold it in my personal capacity. When you have a

past, the past will follow you. If you don' t go out with the first mistake to say I was wrong, I' m sorry, I was wrong and going out to say this is not a certain point, no yes and with all peace, the purpose of truth, the purpose of

the program, are complicated issues. One understands no and one speaks, as I say always, always, of observable conduct, of observable conduct, which is what people give us so publicly they put it there for one to analyze and for one to learn things, for one to apply it to one' s own life, for one to become aware of the things that happen and can in a moment has given to prevent some or to resolve intelligently or with greater knowledge others and so on. That' s not the purpose of the

program. And then some of the things we have tried here to dismantle, for example, these conceptual errors that are handled as lightly as if they were known about it, because among them we have talked a lot about what it is but it is, for example, a Stockholm syndrome, that many people take it as a flag to say this case is not also now to say that there is no infallible evidence, which is not unique evidence. That' s what we' re doing here and here that says look, the lawyer

says summer. The lawyer does. He talked about Melisa today. I say they were very pleased with how the evidence was collected and how many days before the judge' s ruling. And I insist on the case of melida ah bueno. That' s the same thing. First to Melisa good embrain. Yeah, we' ve already been told, don' t scold us, but what the luiter said to accept them is that fallen doesn' t use it. The lawyer did, but they fell good it' s probably he

' s forbidden to talk because he' s in the process. I probably don' t know, probably not exactly. We don' t lynch canvasir. We' re talking about body language. Yeah, we were talking about that kid. If he talked to a victim like that, he was shaking fissus. Yeah, we said it right on the spot, and Calimba came out and talked The kid took the video She' s not gonna have proof

or anything. Hey. Regarding the Cabezut case, the day appeared, a day or two ago this video of Susana de Asayas, friend of Cabezut, and says the following go ok Limba will face. No. This one didn ' t forgive me I was going to Kalino' s again. Forgive me. No, then I didn' t come down the other one. I have an apology. Let me look for it, let me look for it, but, well, we keep talking because, yes, Susana comes out of Asayas to say and talk about her friend' s personal life. It

' s just that I know the same thing, but forgive me. But let me see because I don' t know why or see. You seek law, for what we saw is not france, I think it is expected in half a second, but continue you and another you are making me talk. This actress does come out saying that she is a long- time friend of Fatrizio Cabezut and that she has witnessed how the problems began in this marriage

and that they have resulted in a great lawsuit around the daughters. And she says that well, that there was a problem there between them as a couple, that generated the separation and that from that separation, the lady what she wants is a department and that to pressure her today ex- husband to leave the department, because she has been resorting to being different accusations that have been instilling truth to achieve that purpose. That' s what it says to me

to see if this video is going to be the truth. I thought about doing this video a lot. Well, as you know, I' m a friend of Patrick Cabezut and today I woke up with the news that he has an arrest warrant for rape of his daughters that the mom put up. Well, I didn' t want to talk about it, but I' m gonna do it this lady. And I' m gonna do it because I' ve already checked the notes that Patrick made public. Otherwise I wouldn

' t say anything. This lady cheated on Patricio Cabezo with a married man and I listened to the videos where she says if she doesn' t give me the apartment, I' m going to screw him and then what happened. He denounced him for family violence. Patrick' s been trying to see his daughters for two years and this lady, as much as the judge told her a lot, do you have to introduce your daughters? He doesn'

t present them and he doesn' t present them. And now, after two years that she loses her trial and is forced by law to present the girls, the lady disappears And after many weeks of being missing and since she lost, then she denounces him for abuse the sexual abuse complaint to her daughters.

You know the damage this lady is doing to her daughters. They know how hurt and hurt it is for the girls to be with this crazy lady, that all she wanted through the divorce was to take away the apartment Patrick bought before marrying her. Where he' s gonna get money from. Patricio gives all the money he can for the girls, because he was out of work thanks to this woman' s complaints, because he has to be paying

lawyers thanks to this woman' s complaint. What this lady is doing is perjuring her daughters, because it is over now, if it is forceful, her no- one has said that she is a friend of Cabezuti and she is aware of the case of Cerca, but I don' t know what they want to say about it. That aside from the audios, because I worry a lot no and I insist, i e I see this actress give her statement that she sees that she knows the case and I remember the audios

of aura and I worry because I insist in the hands of who these real girls are, i e, how you have to have the soul to dare accuse dad and your daughters of something so serious to take your daughters in front of experts and I don' t know how many things to face them in something so sad just for an apartment. I don' t think it' s worth it, and I think I insist we should check out the people

who make those accusations. I also mean, I don' t know and if anyone can tell me, if anyone here knows me that I' m out of law if when someone makes an accusation, also the one you accuse of war, visa how you' re all in health, because it' s that we' re facing a social madness. Well, I don' t know. I am very out of date with the truth in that I would like someone who knows more to tell us, but I suppose it is something that can be requested like you, as an accused you can also request

that the accuser be evaluated to assess his mental state as well. And how reliable he is and so forth, I suppose, but I think something here is going to be thought unquestionably. It is, of course, a friend of Patricio Cabe sot comes out because her friend defends him, because she is her friend, because yes, yes, it is true, because I too

have said it here many times the same as the personal title. Of course one defends his friends, of course I, Melisa defend my friends and support my friends, because besides, I try to have friends in which I can trust those that I don' t have to worry about embarrassing or coludir and others, and still well, maybe they will be wrong and then in private I will tell them what I think and I will respect it publicly and support

them and so on, without lying, without conluding one ever with anything bad, then the one that this woman defends his friend, because it is understandable from that perspective. But she' s throwing out certain rather strong comments as to having information, and she' s also saying something that we did all certainly see that Patricio Cabezo has been struggling to see her daughters for two years.

We have also seen him on the streets with groups of other dads with blankets saying I want to see my daughters because they are my daughters and I love them insteadFrom looking at me with my hands, I leave and then that too. Yes, it is true that we have seen it and it is also true the other time the sequence of facts that she relates, because she says when the judge says you have not complied and that the daughters must see the father after her being hidden or because she says so we are hidden.

We' re afraid no one will say how much we are. After that comes this new. That is very interesting, I think, because it does seem to me to be a case that I think we will continue to give good space to talk about this, because, because I think it is not worth it and it is not something new that happens, because we have seen cases of famous people, but there have always been these kinds of false actions about parents, because not so serious. I insist we speak Friday mel you

must have listened to us. We talked about the case, so yes, you didn' t write on the chat. I already look at grass, because it is a very similar case that can be very illustrative in this kind of manipulation cases where you lie and can lead to even more serious things. But good is the one for today we' re done. And now I ' m going to have a great time with all the good and good that Kalimba came out, that he gave his face and, then, that he clears his name and it' s over. And so let it be the

royal righteousness. Not your conclusion, dear Dr Amel, for hell not. Someone put this one for you It' s retrograde mercury. You know I don' t. This one doesn' t handle me in that area. But how strong is society and how unfortunate are some of the things that happen and how do they fill us with doubts, how do they leave us full of doubts? And that' s why one has to be all the time reviewing the material that appears and talking about it to see as much as possible,

as much clarity as we can have. And I' m going to say hello to dul and Mary because they' re asking for greetings before thank you very much. Thank you, Efrail, let' s take care of the social quarrel and the contemplative sheepfold, of thinking like everyone else so that they don' t stop wanting to avoid questioning us. We have to question, question that we did not complain to people and we were so trying today that we did not give hearts or anything, because today the thing was at

last. But it' s like that in the rain. I' m an apeno to the power of the neuron. The wax. I love it, so much thanks to everyone for having accompanied us at Spreaker, in Spotify, in iTunes, on Amazon. Thanks also those who are here on YouTube, those who are on Facebook, Thanks for your likes, for sharing, for sharing the program on any of the platforms would help us a lot to share it. Thank you very much and I' ll see you here tomorrow

in peace and let' s go to history in history. The discussion will also be good, because we all have something to say to them are very good. I liked that thanks to everyone' s chicken liy.