Welcome? Yeah? Yeah? Yeah? Stop it? Yeah? Stop it? Welcome? Welcome to this Monday, April 8, Eclipse Day. Today I' m seeing that I overshadowed my face on this side, put myself in the lusa. There as I have to put a good time for distoria in history, I change the light or welcome way to this day, as I told you. Welcome, Dr Amel Hello, good night, a lot of prepping for today. So, thank you for these many things, welcome,
Efra bab Hello. Girls, how are you on this Monday of retrograde mercury Eclipse on the Rhine Everyone, Right now, we' re going to talk about it. Thanks to those who are already connected from Facebook, to all those who are connected from YouTube, thanks to those who are members of this channel, to those who are subscribers of this channel, those who are
passing through. Thank you all and thank you for the likes you give us, for the comments you leave us. Thank you Spreaker, Spotify, iTunes, Amazon Music, Thank you for listening to us and I ask you, please share us and search us on these platforms on anyone share so that this program and this project you believe, because the truth is that we do it very eagerly. We' re having so much fun. Yeah, that'
s very professional. So this here the variety hears right now. Let' s talk about the Eclipse, but first let' s put nothing else on the subject. We' re all going to talk about the debate. We ' re not going to get into politics, because we' re not a
policy program, we' re not a political analyst' s table. For that he is third grade and Sir Gómez Leyva was there and there were forums, I don' t know where, and those of forty and the good ones, a lot of political aalists there and know very much and know all the reality of the country. But as ordinary ordinary citizens, we all have to be interested in who will govern us, because we are all concerned, we are all concerned, we are all concerned about health, about education,
about taxes, about work, about safety, about everything. So, of course it has to be an issue that we all care about and I don
' t know what you think. First point, because some say no, because it won the debate and the one that didn' t win and so on and no, because it could only reveal a debate where you can get nervous, where the clock didn' t work, where they put a back that distracted the attention a lot, because it was changing where there was nobody who knew who was in the middle of Claudia Schanebown and s Stoogil Galves,
because nobody knew who this in the middle Domsikini, in Schinis. Well, well, that' s not who Depri was interrupting like he wasn' t, that' s gonna define our vote. You can or how you see it, you think you can, that could define people' s vote. Who wants to think of me. I don' t think this debate is
going to define people' s vote. I believe that what could and is actually happening because, in addition, in the analyses that many people have begun to share since yesterday, because what we see, of course, is a tendency to favour the debates that support an idea already prior to each of us. I honestly believe that what happens is that it reinforces, merely reinforces previous
positions. I do not know what will happen in a forthcoming debate, but at this moment it seems to me that it did not merely reinforce those who favor Claudio Shembo that position, To those who are favoring those chilies favor that position And those who do not have much idea of what to do, because they are a little encouraged by myness, which I say with all respect to the lord and to his right to be within this contest, because it is
a pity, because we know historically what happens so that for that they put them, put them, to divide the vote, puts them in discord, exactly that I do not even fulfill I thought this afternoon a function of catalyst. Not even catalyze adana. It does nothing, absolutely Ephraim, because I am very mustache there nothing more hindering this very sad. I think I want to take the debate. As I say so and it' s costing me so much work because I, I mean, it was all a meme.
I don' t think what he' s saying is completely shared. We were more polarized than ever. The debate is not going to define anything, because no one said anything, that is the reality. No one said anything new from my perspective and in the afternoon I told her a friend. I think she won from Nis Merker and told me a friend didn' t,
but it was me starting out because of exactly why everything was terrible. The truth is, yes, I think we should do something like a country to remove this character that was in the middle of it just by nasting the cake to the most there was temporary, because good and no way. Unfortunately, we have and have said so many times, we pay a lot of taxes to keep parasitic parties sold to the highest bidder, such as the Green Party
Citizens' Movement. Then there are thousands and thousands and billions of pesos spent on political parties that are parasites, nothing more than families. That' s what I really do. That is why this character is there, not that they are sold to the convenience of being like fi That is, on the one hand, but on the other hand, the debate itself, when we
are at a decisive moment. It is the first time in Mexico' s history that a woman will govern us, because the contest is between two women, Sochil gallvez that and Claudia Shinoun. I' m not talking about favoritism or anything. I have my way of thinking and everyone will have theirs. But being as important an event as they are going to, we will be ruled by a woman for the first time without there being a revolution and hand, because that' s simply how the board was played and women were left
to rule. There was a bad sound in the beginning and a hole in it. Like I told you, the back of the studio was movable. Then it was distracting because it was full of colors. If you look at us, I' ll put them like this, we' re in remote boxes. So, if I teach you this as much as possible, you ' re not going to read it. No. Then if I had put them in. If I got like this and I showed them this, they
' d see my entire April 8 week schedule. It' s not the difference and here they put us away then all the cardboards they brought, everyone who was, they didn' t even see Claudia Shane Ban the other poor. I didn' t do anything, but neither the Shabon nor Galvez saw anything. There was, I mean, the discussion wasn' t even raising I' m going to make, or was there, there were certain proposals I' m going to make in education, I' m going to make,
but in general there were no proposals. No, and I think the public is missing a second debate. But that' s how I think it was played as a very trivial part. It' s not trivia as you say. Fran is going to analyze and I' m going to tell you one thing that has me a little worried and sorry because I don' t
have postures. All homos, Jorge, I' m going to vote sorry for you yamstery for ju forever whatever, don' t mean, don' t get mad, but here everyone will see for what suits them, because that' s how the human being is and not moderating that way we are. So I always check what' s up with each of them' s LGBT agendas and what' s you asking for, Claudia, no forgiveness and forgiveness, sorry, Claudia, but they received them with great tear. It
' s correct because let' s say it, it mentions exactly. When she mentions it, we are the government that has protected the most. When last week Mrs Clemente, who was super, super, super four, made tea go look and said the four tele betrayal to the community back. They
filled us up, they turned us down. So it looks like he wasn ' t even aware of what' s going on, and not just the trans community There' s no medication for people with h since he was at four that there was no containment on the monkey fever issue two years ago.
I mean, if Claudio doesn' t remember that, I do, I would like it to be so very peaceful, because I too do have a position that I don' t want to share, because I just don' t want this to go back to a misinterpreted question like that we' re talking about ourselves, why we don' t defend anyone and they' ve put us where they rightly defended or I don' t know who when it
' s not the case. But I, like, see it as a social phenomenon, a little unmarked from any personal position I might have, and that I tell you, I prefer to reserve myself, because that' s my decision. But the montage, let' s say, and the whole development of this deba leaves me quite disappointed. Everywhere. I believe that Sochi and Galvez, because he lacked a great deal of aplomb, a great deal of eloquence can be seen that the betrayal of nerves. I am not talking
about specific ideas, but about this question of management. Let' s say the debate as such. And well, Claudia Schingon, who simply and simply stood in her unmovable position of not responding to what was prefected. Well almost all questions you citizenship. The citizenry sent and simply did not answer and rather dedicated itself to pondering their awards and recognitions and so on. So that is very disappointing, but I wanted to contribute from my field of work, because
a reflection that did immediately come to my mind and is good. In nineteen hundred and twenty- nine, one thousand nine hundred and thirty, Freud publishes a very important text called The Unease in Culture, which today remains one of the texts, although we already know that Fraiud was in neurologistic and later,
since the creator of psychoanalysis or the father psychoanalysis. This text of the malaise in culture is the foundation of the discipline of sociology and in it it speaks of how the culture, that is, the evolution, the development of societies to be increasingly sophisticated and more organized, is inhibiting, say, the impulses or impulses of the human being and forces us to repress them very much.
And then you cannot walk through life living from what you feel and what you want, but you have to adjust to what culture demands and in this case, not only in the debate, in the debate, yes, but also in everything that is happening around. I see that this malaise in culture has been lost a lot and then, far from being in a world of ideas, in a world of genuine real proposals based on the common good, which
seems to win over and over again, because that is not it. You ' ve lost a lot of exenios myself already, but at least when they were the rough one and I think it was with Fox, he didn' t tell me the rough one, the beast told me, at least they were fun because they said this, but wow, I' m not going t, but it was dreamy. He was sympathetic. Then the other,
to say Fox was ay what a brilliant man. Not because it wasn' when Fernández was also there, goes away and I am not saying that they are impolute, sinning nothing in or immaculate, only, of course, that they had a much more entertaining rhetoric. One of the most interesting things can read to Dr Sagal, who is a doctor of philosophy and was once master of mine. Well, notice that Dr Sagarza was absolutely right, because I ' m not saying I insist that the previous characters were brilliant, but they
did have better rhetoric. Why he won and why many presidents win and I ' m sorry, I' m sorry don' t get angry. But it' s true because López Obrador' s speech is the one that helps him get there. And it turns out that it helps him so much that even if it doesn' t match the facts, they continue to support him
because the rhetoric serves him and there was no such thing here. There was no rhetoric with either of the three, nor with Sochil Galves, but neither with Claudia Shamboun and, by the way, the other person nor mention it. I insist, because it' s a real saying. We should not even vote for whoever you want, Shane Bown or Claudia or Sochill Galves, but ignore the other person, because that person is about to spoil the election. That' s why they put her there and she' s living for
free. You know it' s not going to be anything, but that ' s how I think it takes, above all, fluency eloquence, a much better line design. I' m sorry. I' m also very sorry, but everyone who hates Mr Córdoba is going to like him very much. But the previous debates were considerably better organized, I insist, from the sound, from the stage, from the taking of the candidates, a cropped image, they looked very much like the moderators, because they were the ones
who were far away and they were the ones who stood out. But go for the rest if it is a failure and I feel it infinite. But a big part of the failure of this debate is undoubtedly the organisation of Efrain line and told them a situation with all peace and without having to be really biased, because I insist I still do not have a position and that is my reality? I still don' t have a position, but when they ask Souchill about the LGBT Sutchic issue, they always said good from day one.
But you go with the bread and where I dance my posture. This and that is the issue of going out to defend things from what you believe and from your reality, not like Claudia, who is clearly carrying a scrit of what she had to say with semi- coma those situations are hopeless. That' s one and two. This thing about being progressive because doing what the lord did in the end, this one that you' re trying to
speak and sign language, is an insult. Sir, if you don' t know how to do it, don' t do it, don' t make a fool of yourself, because it looks like I looked for another word, but I didn' t find it and it looks like something stupid class not very silly. He looks so dumb. Are they ridiculous? Are
they ridiculous? Look at one of the things that happens with politics in Mexico and one of the things that I think that' s what you meant mel and this part of a critical thought of knowing how to question, are arguments like those that are writing to me. Says Marian Lupita. Even you feel sorry to say that you are a pianist, because no, because I am not a pianist I have never played in any game, nor have I ever been favored in my life, because my lies because you do not know it
says Carlos Adago, just yesterday Ephraim. But during the debate there were several people who are carriers of ve i AchE. They precisely said that these medicines have never been lacking. There are others who have said yes. Says Marifer Santos. I have my vote defined. I already have a choice. I ' m aware that it' s not the best option, but the truth is everything that' s been happening to me in our country I don'
t like. And Melda says tell me if I' m wrong. The first debate in Mexico was when Colocio and Ceballos were there and that was very good. And that was a good one That' s what I mean. That' s what I' m talking about with a good debate. Says those who don' t, says Tony Lopez, that everyone has already decided. No. If we' d all decided, I' d vote for the whole list. And unfortunately, Mexico has a high percentage of abstentionism.
Unfortunately, unfortunately, the clock was tampered with. I don' t know Marlen Lugo whether the watch was manipulated in favor of Sochill or not or I don' t repeat that we couldn' t say in favor of Sochi because already those who said they were in favor of Hoche no longer control the line. He didn' t miss them. He failed them for whatever reason you want, and the three of them complained. Sara allelí, but that' s the lack of critical thinking to think they' re being manipulated. The
three of you didn' t miss the watch. My younger brother is going to vote for it, and that made me so angry that we have to commit. Sar is our country. I don' t want my country to go on like this. Elizabeth says that that money could well be used for exact service everything that goes in political parties, parasites that we should be a maximum bipartisan, three, but so many who keep the fox here and lived long. Then she erased our laughter. It says exactly and gentleman, we
are not good at arguing. We' re missing a lot of exact work. You have to learn to argue, and in peace you say to Sayuri, in peace, Lupita, if you want to have fun, go to a clown show, because that' s what we had yesterday. Or a Zururi clown show. What I want is rhetorical eloquence. Speech arguments, that ' s what I want. I' m Yuri, I' m a clown show, I saw it yesterday. That was it. That was yesterday ' s debate. Says Marianne. There' s please, if Claudia had
played funny, you' d be done. No. Not really. It wasn' t about being funny. It just seems like this part doesn' t understand the difference between eloquence, a good rhetoric to make the clown that ' s a difficult part, which is what I think is the strong topic to talk unclear And besides, I' m already curious to you, because there are many people, some critics, who have political critics, who have a lot of support, experience and ability to make this kind of criticism.
But yes, I noticed that some said, for example, that the format, because it was very rigid, had not allowed these candidates to explain themselves in their comments or in their questions or in their answers and so on, and notice that I am a little bit at odds there, because just that lack of eloquence, which is seen in a climate of a narrow design, of a murate imagine yourself if there are not those points or that order or
that structure that, perhaps it would seem rigid, but that otherwise it would have been, as I say, a batiburrillo, I mean, it would have been a worse mess even because there did not seem to be a guideline. And this is supposed to be very prepared. She weighs a lot that looks like Claudia Shaiman and Shiman were very prepared. So, I was very prepared to say what I wanted and not answer the questions. But, well, that was part of his preparation. But imagine an open, free format,
because it wouldn' t have left us. I think so, but exactly Ephraim. To close this topic. To close this issue, look at people who come to power to get a little bit of stuff, there' s always going to be in a personal capacity with all peace, people from the LGB community are going to say that they' re the President' s bitch and things like that we' ve always had and don' t represent us all. And there is an important section of the population demanding medicines,
because what they said here in a message is a reality. There' s no neas pyrins, so leave the BGP meds. No, no, no, no, no, no. Well, that' s the point, and no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
that was the debate, and that was a very important issue. And you know that if I know that you listen to us here, in other countries, in the United States, in Central America, in South America, in another in Spain, eight is important from all countries. Hey, they'
re asking us for bisa for Peru. We already asked the Peruvians to step in, we already fought, well, I didn' t, but the government and corporal fought with Ecuador. We' re not going to discuss that because we' re not in politics and we' re going to scratch. But, well, we' ve already been asked for a visa for Canada. Then this one, we have to get along well, we have to get along well. Hey, next one. The next thing that happened, well, it' s already our eclipse. Today was the eclipse. I
had two medical appointments in the morning, so I was. I said I want to get out. Or tell me altogether that he did go out at twelve o' clock this day, because no more in Mexico, no more shadows were seen in Mexico City or not. I mean, he saw this. There wasn' t a moment that did as if I was starting a sunset, I didn' t embrain such a thing, I did go out
and I already got some glasses and the whole thing. A momentous perspective what horror we were hearing Bravos, but he never saw so much, in fact, he told me already I saw you no longer leaving, Mr Hey, but he was. Yes, he was emotionally intense, as I told him, Pesadona, they did. You guys felt it. Those who are listening to us felt that there was. I' m going to confess. My two dates were with the dermatologist and the dentist. The first date was with
the dentist at ten in the morning and it was very mild. It wasn ' t anything that was anxiety or anything. I was really sleeping that I was falling asleep, that is when I no longer crossed the building to go with the dermatologist and kept sleeping. I kept falling asleep, that' s sometimes like I got weird tired. I always want to look for the logical explanation. I was gonna tell you, because you went to the Shower. But that was Saturday. Don' t imagine I' d have ended up
on Sunday. No, no, no, the sower left at eight o ' clock at night. They don' t believe, I mean, either, or two o' clock in the afternoon. He was leaving at eight o' clock at night. I didn' t stay there until dawn either. Nothing. I slept very well. I slept very well. I rested very well. And I don' t think he' s looking. I believe that subject to whatever Ephraim tells us. From this other way, let us say to understand the phenomenon and its influence in our lives, which we
have already said here many times is indisputable. That' s how it is. We are certainly part of a system, of a system that has some form of life. Not then do I mean this solar system, which has an operation, has an order, has an influence, the moon, the force of gravity and so on. That is, of course, that we are immersed in a lot of forces and energies that do influence us so much.
It is so well known also that in these countries, for example, where they have prolonged winter nights, very long, specific periods from night to night only, not for weeks and so on, as happens in Alaska and elsewhere. Obviously, that has an undoubted effect on the mood of people, because it has to do with both biological and chemical processes of the organism and
those emotional. Just being faced with darkness all the time. Or I' m just a man, I was there at the dentist, I wasn' t stuck in a building, I mean nothing, but suddenly he started hitting a dream. But perhaps, I thought that, on the one hand, there might be a real influence of the unseen. I mean, that' s why I got more that got dark or didn' t get dark,
but something was going on. And also maybe, one effect of suggestion is that this was would differ I, to see, says Paula Bucaro, we were a couple that, gave us glasses and made pin I felt a special energy can be the emotion of seeing something so supernatural. In fact, it ' s not supernatural. It is quite natural that people give explanations in addition, but so must exist something that affects us, without suggestion that the animals
themselves react. I live, as you know, on a hill. Then I was at the doctor' s at ten, the other appointment was at eleven. I came to my house, like about twelve and ten or so that the eclipse was still going on, because the hospital is very close.
They could hear me live where there were farms and gidal. You heard cocks, you sang cocks, you heard birds, like I am good at sunrise I mean, then yes, it is a real astronomical matter that, of course, has to affect you in some way, because dogs keep the animals and keep them and I think a little bit of everything, but it ingests without denying the real phenomenon at all with its effects on us. No yes, yes, I believe Ephraim, because notice that at the weekend, I
began to corroborate that it was completely. And then four very professional astrologers told me we' re going to play the chiron. That is the chiron, is this pain that we all have in the soul, with which we connect with humanity. It' s a pain that' s never gonna go away, but we can connect with each other. Then we had to feel it
so we could break it, take it off and finish it. So, right now, it was an eclipse of lights and shadows, because we had to feel our pain in order to release it and help others, human beings, we have to start being more empathetic. Then, speaking astrologically, it was an eclipse to feel our pain, embrace and love and love others. So, is it nice? Astrologically, it' s not very pretty. The truth, I mean, look at it, and I started checking with
anthropologist friends. For no culture of eclips are decreed. Hey, all cultures talk about the team then ending something. In all of them I looked it up and looked it up and I said to myself or none because I was discussing it in the past program, in the comments, in no culture talking about history and anthropology and I challenge it. Now I' m a challenge they like to be told. A culture in which eclipses mean the beginning of
something is the end. He always hears, but that I did you know that like you told us there was something to do about leaving things behind. I said let' s leave behind bad habits and disorder and I started doing my diet and I' m going to start my fast and my drinking omen. You did something to me like that, almost as New Year' s
purposes. Almost new purpose. I think I don' t know how much I say here, because you' ve been known here for years with all this work you' ve done for so long, but I don' t know how much people know about the disciplined that you' re really. I am very surprised, because I also saw everything Ephraim said. But at the time of the hour I am dragged by the gust from day to Monday, after the weekend the activity of the work and goes up the discharge and suddenly
I pass the same medical appointment. Not mine, but where I accompanied someone, then we get hungry half a day down the street. And I ended up eating everything Ephraim said I didn' t go drinking wine, drinking anise. But I think if I thought about it from that special point of view that you were saying about love and so on, because the truth is,
I had a really good time. I had a lovely time with a person I love a lot of good and just yeah, see if I do a little bit talking about topics maybe not very easy, but I think so with the intention of breaking up with everything that was left of those not easy issues already, to finish leaving them behind. Then I think that' s always good. No greetings to those who listen to us from Ecuador. Thank you.
Now I do very well, I had a defensive ballast and I said, because I celebrate every year, they like the new year, the year eight, every new year I celebrate and I leave my defending teacher, I always told her it is a time to start, to renew. It is always perfect to renew yourself, to renew every moment that is something new. And I think that' s the one that has an impulse for me.
He took me out of my house because I had to be alone here in my house, touching my pains, because I am very intense with these things. And an impulse pulled me out of the street. I ended up at the monument of the Revolution. Andra filmed some glasses surrounded by people and I said you' ve never been alone because and I share them, I love that loneliness. This family thing hits me a lot and I said look at people in front of me today. So much, the world is fine yesterday.
That' s good, good. We' re going to move on to the other topic we' re going to see because this topic and I was going to bring up this topic and we were going to talk about the Marks folklore that we played on Friday that everyone said if there' s anyone. Indeed, no one knew who he was, and no one would have to know who the Marquis Fulmn is. But it' s this man who
raped a woman in a parking lot in February. And then, in the month of February, this man is, ma' am hitting this person' s rearview mirror and he' s not telling the lady I' m going to get the papers out of the second. You' re gonna talk to him about insurance and he says I don' t think so and boom hits him. He takes her out of the truck, hits her, throws her on the floor, ends up kicking her, and then he' s stopped.
He' s stopped and he' s smiling. Smile. Smile because he' s smiling that he' s been arrested because he' s supposed to have a lot of money. He says he makes a lot of money. It' s a great ip on the heir of I don' t know what. That' s all so lame. And this was Thursday when they stopped and I suppose he would be free Friday. I think I even saw a video right now, but I don' t know if it' s true. But according to me, until now, Monday, March 8, at seven in forty- eight has not gone as far as I know.
But the problem here is violence. Why there are these types of rapists.
We had news from Brad Pittefrayin, from ord to notice that Angelina declared for a newspaper that we already knew that in the two thousand sixteen, Brad had bled her that they came from a trip from France to Los Angeles and everyone knew that she had taken violent violence and so on, because Angelina said that that was not the first time and that, in fact, before adopting the last girl, she had already presented some types of violence and they know
what I thought the note was. I believe Angeli did not know that he was violent and gave them to him in peace, because in this culture that we have been opening our eyes over the last few years, especially the pandemic, came to open our eyes big, big, big. I think we ' ve already realized that the man was a violent guy that the fact that you hold your strong hand are raping exactly the one that hits your hand so
they' re raping you not then what she meant. It had to do with the issue of not knowing that she was being raped and that since before she adopted the last child she was already violent. I' m going, look, see, right now, keep talking badly if you want to while I bring them in, because I pulled out today morning the violent meter, Right now, I' m remembering here I' ve got it, and yes, it' s very good, Right now, yes, exactly right. I' m gonna show them to you, look, I used to
have a lot of these is just like good. I think it had a shape like a cardboard rule and you give it to women especially. But also clear that it can be to men, to anyone who feels in danger of being raped to recognize those signs, as Ephraim rightly says, that sometimes people normalize, that is, they get used to or believe that they are acceptable and they are not, because, moreover, this is always climbing. Then he starts with one thing and he' s going up, up to his
life. And that' s why it' s always better, because stopping it before it becomes an exact real tragedy. Here' s one you already have, now, I got it, but finish it, then I said. It is a real sadness that one wonders over and over again, over and over again where the hell this comes from. I mean, how is it possible that there are people so hostile and so violent can be on the loose street? How can that happen? And well, the answer is that,
unfortunately, in matters of mental health, the diagnosis is insufficient. In other words, there are many people who are very disturbed and very disorganized in their mental structure, which is loose. Totally true, totally true to see Let' s go there, come on, come on, because there it is It' s from women. This is also published by the National Institute, the national polytechnic FOTBO. And I don' t know the islands there aren' t those of my college. But, well, there goes the
violometer. Start zero, then nothing. But one hurtful jokes, those jokes, that jokes that, well, it' s a joke. But they hurt you not and it can start from neither love, you don' t think it' s not after, that' s not another. This is more scaled up. Not a irritating joke, it would be a joke to you to joke a hurtful joke. It' d be like I' m
blowing a water balloon in your face. You' re humiliating yourself. You know what I mean, you' ve just made up, and I' m blowing a water balloon in your face, and I' m messing with you. Blackmail, blackmail. If you don' t do this, I ' ll go. If you don' t do this, I' m gonna get mad, lie and cheat? Lying and cheating. Obviously, that is obvious. He' s going up to that he' s got it
on the screen Sorry. Ephraim continues to ignore and this is here. I think that' s when I start the violence very sharp, ignore the law of ice, punish you and stop talking about the jealousy that is growing, blaming the other one of me, as I will tell you, because of you, the children do not study, because of you the rops is dirty not disqualifying. Here' s what you said disqualifying here is whether or not
you have how he knows how to see everything. I mean, yeah, it' s okay for you to say, but the truth is, whatever you say doesn' t count to ridicule and offend Hey, you look so fat in that dress, your sister' s better or the cousin looks better or not. This violent no more, no, it' s not only in pairs, eh, it can also be from parents, to children, from amir, from friends, it can be from another authority, from the boss, the teacher, but it can be accurate your friends who ridicule you.
No, that' s violence, publicly humiliating. There are many teachers who do that or many parents who do that. Intimidating, threatening or terrible controlling, prohibiting intimidation and threat is usually in secret and that is where there is a great deal of fear of denouncing, controlling and prohibiting. I mean, you can' t get out of it at such an hour, you can' t go see such little friends. No, and then they start banning you. Friendships, money, places, appearances, activities, cell phone,
e- mails, all that starts to control you. They have access to everything else. This is growing and we' re getting red. Destroy personal items. I break your clothes, I break your computer, I break your notebooks, your books, I shake your hands when you don' t want to, when you like one. That' s aggressive caresses, too. Oh, well, no truth, turning around playing is like the jokes
of the beginning. I wouldn' t put the jokes around here, because it' s a hit, right, but good to pinch scratch, let ' s go up, push, jerk, slap, kick, that' s where this fofo marques comes to slap, kick, and it' s already going up in the most serious part of violence, lock up a lot
of isolation. That happened to this actress what' s called the auro vinitat and I just told her that she ended up being locked up not threatening and many women like you say embrain, because they don' t realize threatening with objects or weapons. We are already in the most serious part that you need professional help, threatening to die, forcing a sexual relationship, sexual abuse,
rape, maiming and, finally, reaching death. That is the violent meter and fofo, since this man was twenty- six years old yesterday, he had reached the number twenty- one. We are talking about thirty, that is, it had already reached a limit of very serious violence. So one of the things they' re telling you about is attempted femicide. That' s what aggravated his situation, but he' s not the only one,
because we have brad Pit. Like you said, he didn' t realize it was violent Ephraim and Angelina, too, what' s going on. I think we are culturally at a time of many changes because, I mean, before it was just hold on. The one who can' t stand the jokes is then, that is, I remember there I' m going
to find people telling aunts of mine. Oh you' re very silly France and me as well as not aunts, I mean, my mom is the youngest and she' s eighty years old, that is, obviously, when you took off and my aunts assumed supersumistically that the husband was right, because yes yes, I can say it and I don' t mean and we ' re and I think what Angelina is going on with her is that she ' s saying God, yes she was violent and here they were telling us
in a couple of exact poisons yes, but what you' re talking about, like you said Ephraim. But when it' s these jaloneos, which is what one of the children had described, I don' t know what and I don' t want to be like what I' m going to say, but let' s stop using the toxic word and tell them because there' s nothing in the toxic brain. Toxic is a substance and others say it as it is, because here we are always told to be very correct and I tell you that I, in health things, can be very
correct. We' re always insane people and it hurts more. It hurts so much to say what an unhealthy couple they' re not. Let' s say it like this, let' s stop using the toxic prefix, because it really analyzes it if I say it with all peace and with much and we' re going to even joke, not exactly, it' s already cool to be toxic or I' m already toxic. Yes, it ' s a silly thing that you say on your part, who I didn ' t make fun of, I don' t even totally agree with,
I totally agree exactly. Look Bonny gives us his testimony. He lived this and well, yes, it' s good that you managed to get out of that relationship, because that' s the hard part And we have for example I put Gustavo Adolfo Infante, who is a rapist and could be in public humiliation, which is what he has done with many people. What I want to have happened, for example, with me, was to humble in public what he has done with Jorge Carvajal, is to intimidate, threaten,
try to control what others say. In short, then, yes, yes, yes, it is a violent one, but why we are or why women or why people can feel with this right to violence the other, because what it gives them is fear. I think it' s fear, but I don' t know what you think. I think yes, there is an indisputable feeling of inferiority in other aspects of your personality, very often in
the intellectual, very often in the moral quality. And so, then, the only weapon that remains, for it is physics or truth, physical violence or verbal violence to defend itself from a very great feeling of inferiority. It is then sought to demonstrate superiority through the violence that can be exercised by physical force. But, for example, it is also a sadness that today and I think that was also the case with this Mr Fofo, that I do not know what I mean by that, by the way, I do not
know whether it is his real name or not. We have another way of getting to know him more than I think, but I mean, you have money, your family has economic power, and maybe certain relationships, it' s really pathetic. What sadness, because that is something that has undoubtedly happened throughout history, but that would seem to be very important today, as in the foreground, this question because I will be a person and I don'
t say it because I don' t even know how it is. If I study and have no idea, but in general let' s say a person who doesn' t know, as my dad said neither the or the round, has no culture, has no image of respect, earned on the basis of work, based on honesty, based on qualities that would be important, but simply say I have money, I call what I want, I mean, it' s a real and a real shame that on that people
are basing their value today. Then I find it sad. And yes, it seems to me of people who don' t have much within themselves, that is, they don' t have an emotional armament that gives them the ability, for example, to deal with people through the word, which would
be the most civilized thing we have. This is like pretty animalic. I wouldn' t say I don' t know about Ephraim and also understand that the person who is the victim of violence doesn' t have to be prepared to answer the violence, because that' s another one, I mean suddenly ay, but it' s also because he didn' t say anything, there are both of us toxic. No, I don' t have to
have the guns to get your violence. That is, yes, it is simple because sometimes we are young, we have no experience, we do not know how to answer and we have to understand that because to blame the victim again, to be raped, to victimize the victim and to justify the victim. I mean, here there will be people like us, who are very prepared, like they squealed prepared and out of elementary school and sometimes even being very prepared, like mexir, not prepared for elementary school. We don'
t know how to answer. And I' m going to tell you one thing. It ever happened to me like a boyfriend who told me you didn ' t dress like Rosa because it' s women' s. No, and then I stopped wearing pink. It happened I went to therapy. Many years went by and some other boyfriend wanted to tell me not to dress in pink and I told him sonles chavo, the rose does not go to enough one. But I had to have the gun myself to learn to answer.
And that' s what we have to understand. No Angelina didn' t have to have it, because maybe the weed doesn' t believe the women who mind, because we' re in a moment of pendulum. We come from very violent men and now we have to believe women completely so that at some point we are in the middle. But for that because we still have to have you here. No, we don' t have to, we have to have the openness to talk about these uncomfortable issues and point out,
point out, point out. How Gustavo Adolfo is told that they are violent, notice, that you know that I think we are all forgotten, that we are individuals, individuals and we are each different. There are as many differences between human beings as people inhabit the earth, that is, there are all the differences in the world, so we forget that as you say, not everyone has to know how to react to violence, not everyone has to wait for it. And some will know how to defend themselves, but maybe.
Others are much more vulnerable, because they bring a different childhood, because they bring a different trauma, because they bring a lifestyle. Or they had mom, they didn' t have mom and they had violent, they had good dad or. Anyway, there are so many ways you could have spent a childhood. What' s more, you may have had a wonderful childhood, but perceived it as traumatic. Of course it' s the per-
point way you live. That' s right, then it' s not that you believe him or not that people, if they feel attacked, are being attacked point and we just need to clear things up. What you can ' t. And I think this violence of these men over women or over other men. Now we' re talking about specific men, because they'
re the news that jumped. But the violence of these men. I think it' s this despair of losing control, of an exacerbated narcissism where they have to stand out because I' m not the smartest, I' m not the tallest, I' m not the most handsome, I' m not the best writer, I' m not the not so I' m not. Then I have to climb, step on, hurt. And well, Brit brad Pit is a man' s chrome. But it is that Angelina I lie was free, she Angina Yoli had her own children. It
was enough, it was wow, so I do women. She' s gorgeous. Besides, I didn' t think so, it doesn' t tell you that it all started because she was offered a campaign alone and he was very upset. And he in the part, as it was assumed, also had addiction problems. No and remember that, yes, substances destroy that too may have paid well, please, because to increase this problem. And indeed, when a person feels that he has no other means, he will be subject to what he has left. No, and in that case,
yes, the physical superiority he often has. That' s why they' ve heard many times about these phrases that people, because yes, I won ' t know anything, but I' m going to pull you down and I mean, yes, and that makes you a better person or that shows you, because nothing, not just that you have a force, that you ' re going to use it in the worst way. And that' s
it. But this is what some people claim. Well, I won' t know anything, I won' t have it, but I' ll come and wind you up, of course, influential father, and I' ll throw it ahead of you. And besides, as the broken soul that we were this past Wednesday, it wasn' t that of Erik Smith, a thirteen- year- old boy. Why did you kill, because I
can, because I can, not so look says angels May. I had a boyfriend who used to call me fondly and tell me that if I left him, I was going to find myself begging, because he was the best thing that ever happened to me. According to him, when I left him, I realized the abuse. That' s, that' s what happens, you' ve been manipulated so much. Of course, you' ve
been so downgraded. Ephraim, notice that here I am going to answer it with my coach, I am smooth because I give you toy about to finish the race, but I am ready charver yes and I am not Coachefrain, well, my Mentora? Now, your mentor, your supervision? History OK, there was no conception here that if it would be violent, it would not be violent. But the narrative is inherited and we have an obligation to change the narrative completely, that is, not because it didn' t hit.
I' m gonna hit my son, which is what I do. We always regularly educate So and the simplest thing is to follow the narrative. The challenge of life after the eclipse is to change the narrative. Our obligation if we are from here in peace, and I am going to compromise our audience, because our audience is a smart public. The obligation of all followers
to contract peace is to change the narrative. If something has not worked, a change in point changes yes, which yes, yes, some aspects of temperament can be inherited, but, as we have said here too many times, we are not anything else neither genetic, nor are we products of the environment, or anything. We have something very important that is also taken and
brought is another of the very very very cackled phrases. We have a free will, but it' s true is to use it and we have the ability to reflect and, as you say, to make the narrative change and I think that taking advantage of the commercial, because certainly this space and we ' ll say it how many times it is necessary and maybe during each program,
because that' s how it will come out. That is why it is called with all peace, because the intention is that power together to build a conversation in which yes very probably and hopefully there will be different views and even in opposition to each other, but to be able to discuss them from the respect, from the argument based on reason and not on stubbornness or on the personal question, to feel that one wins by winning, because it is not about that exact. I know that, that' s very important.
We' ve been talking about the debate for a while. There were many differences of opinion. The only thing I believe, and you' re right, is looking for, not a point. It' s impossible for all of us to think the same. What is sought is a good argument, a good argument, as we said and you said it perfect Friday. You can give the eclipse a magical interpretation. You can do a ritual you want, even if you don' t, as Jain says. You can say
this is nothing more than pure science, or I can say nothing. But the joke is that with absolute respect and an argument and understanding these differences that we each have. But not pointing out, not pointing out, that' s not an argument, that' s telling me you' re a pianist, because no, that' s not an argument, that' s not our argument. But it does expose our ideas and respect us, learn to respect us. I think that' s very important. Ephraim is just going
that way exactly. That' s why I tell them to learn. They know it' s hard to learn to say this far. Look when my eighty- year- old mom said I' m going to therapy and I said," Holy God" and" I" because I said. Imagine the Terapolde telling you, ma' am, you' ve watered it a lot and you' re 80 years old. And that' s there, because eighty years and in therapy I said wonderful, wonderful never mind. It is late and have humility, because it is the theme, the humility to
say this. It didn' t work out for me. I have to change the system, because it' s not working. Totally clear about this. I think you say that very clearly. If it doesn' t work, this isn' t the system. We have to change the narrative, as Dr Amel said, we have to change this way of discussing, of exposing, without attacking. Without me, I' m going to admit that I don' t, no, I don' t. You can make a lot of jokes and so on, but you can' t destroy it
in personnel. That' s not an argument. And well, we' re going to try and have the violometer always present for them to have. You also present and say this one to see Lupita, you' re violent, No, Ephraim, Dr Amel, you' re violent. Oh forgiveness, forgiveness And because it' s true, they' re also things that are like learned customs. We must learn not to violate and learn to detect
violence. Yes, I have teachers and with him it is not vile that he will tell us, but he told us to see here who has not been violent, of course, because it is fultional. But the important thing is to realize it and you can take a step back, correct and improve it. And not that simple anymore. We' re not perfect, but we can get better every time. And in this argument thing, the cute thing is the way I' ve already talked to you here. It happens
to me even sometimes with some patients I tell them look at you. You ' re waiting for me to shut up to refute what I just told you, because you' re not listening to understand a little, but to see what you' re fighting back with. And that' s not a good argument either. The good argument is when one genuinely listens and sometimes one can say ama has a point no. That' s right, I' m
not going to hear it clearly. Totally cover it up. It' s true and as you say, if they really listen to you, then if you, if you answer yourself, it' s going to be a talk that' s smart and that helps grow what that was about a debate. Not that there are arguments that serve good in the end, but well it was a sad moment to say goodbye guys, we are already going from history to history. I want to tell you that I' m going to tell you all about the Baby Shower, because I was one of the first to
get here. So I' m going to tell you that it was really, really fun. I' ll see you there. Thank you, Dr Amel, thank you all very much. A pleasure, as always let' s go to history and also see you here tomorrow. Thank you, dear Efra, thank you Chihas, thank you to all the people. I love them so happy with Eclipse Xanding. Thanks to all the Instagram messages. I love you, I love you, I love you more, I love you, and I love you, and I love you, and little hearts that
always remind me, brother. I forget later. Hey I was looking for some symbols and I was seeing that then there are some symbols that say they ' re bad And everything, and then here it' s drawn. Anyway.
Thank you so much to everyone who is on YouTube, those who are on Facebook, thank you for sharing, help us share the program, help us grow, discuss, talk, let me leave, I' m going to remove this evil so that they can see what you pointed out, wait for me, but there it is, there it is exactly Slick so that they can discuss, so that we can grow as a community. And well, thank you so much for accompanying the St Spager, Spotify. There are
all those on Amazon, those on Facebook and YouTube. Thank you. If you are looking for us on these radio platforms, we will also be grateful and help us share it. And I' ll see you tomorrow. Guys see you later Dulimar and greetings, Duli Mari, Greetings to everyone else. And let' s go now so if I don' t go, I won' t get there, I won' t get there and they' ll tell me I have, you didn' t get to Time