Rin, we' re here. We are already here this Wednesday, March 6, the year two thousand twenty- four. I don' t know why our dear Efrabed hasn' t arrived, but we' ll be waiting for him here by now. Welcome, Doctor amen Hello, how very good night, yes already waiting here. It' s probably not too late, Ephraim, but I' m glad to say hello. There' s a
lot to talk about exactly an apology. We started again seven thirty. I programmed it felt thirty, there were other previous recordings, but already from tomorrow, again seven fifteen as always, but today seven hundred thirty. But there ' s good, we' ll be in three minutes late, but we
' re here. Welcome. All those who are Spreaker, Spotify, iTunes, all those who are on Facebook, those who are on YouTube, thanks to those who are member subscribers, those who are passing by, all those who give us their likes, comments and so on, we will be eternally grateful and God will give you more oya. Well, welcome back, girls, how are you, what do you say this Wednesday? I don'
t know what day I' m on anymore. Wednesday or boys ge six of March, Wednesday already very very good week for everyone and well, it has been intense and everything, but it has been a good week, the truth as far as I am concerned. But let' s start what you think we start with this day with the good ones or remember that this is not a Here we like to analyze, to talk, to think about yarnos. They said we' re very serious, so we' re not gonna be so serious anymore. We' re going to be more like this,
because as more of the Bliss, you can hear characheros. We have the subject of because yesterday we talked about the issue of Hector Parray and we are going to have a guest soon who knows of laws that he wrote to me with great pleasure today. It' s gonna help us understand this case. But it' s on the Chisme No Like show. It has to be said that it was them in Chisme No online. Those who get the interview with lawyer SamaraÁvila over there can see it complete on the Chisme No No
Like channel. For us it caught our attention because in these in this, because in this interview they do with the lawyer leaves many things clear that are the ones that we have asked ourselves. What are those tests that made us accept, why is it said that there is something unfair, why is it
said that there is a black hand the lawyer. Among the things he says, for example, is that how it was possible that because the interviewers asked him, it would be Mr Serian and the lady asked him why and how he knows how much he will be sentenced now that it is 15 March. He said no, because I' m a wedding boy. I couldn' t tell you, but because there are other characters who do know how long
they' re gonna hurt them before the judge says so. This is as in reference to Mr Mayer, because also in gossip like I think they agree with us in this regard. What is behind this and why there is no more social pressure, because perhaps an injustice is being committed and we are witnessing it. There' s a lot of evidence. Look, you remember something that Ahorita was saying, in what the lady said about the lawyer, about how they lived, yeah, how. Well, I heard it before and
I thought it was very important because we already mentioned it here. However, she explains it well. Before I explained it, she tells you that they have information from the file folder and then she expands that information, in which you gave that the question of the dates, the question of the times is incongruous in some sayings and in others that she talks about that she saw her dad until a certain age, at some times that until he was fourteen years
old and at other times that until he was sixteen. So that, on the one hand, already disillusions this idea that some people argue that, as for the mother, she knew that there was some kind of inappropriate behavior, she had suspended her cohabitation with her daughter' s father, which would not
be real. But also, in fact, it speaks of how she was at a time that they were living in some apartments, in the same building, on the same floor, in the same hallway, and that Alexa came and went very often to the dad' s apartment and that, obviously, there are witnesses to that is nothing more than that she is asserting it and that there was no reason at that time for her to think that from that moment there was already some kind of complaint from Alexa. So the coexistence was
very natural where he told them she went and came in both departments. So this is what she' s talking about, which wasn' t considered during this trial, because when you talk about evidence, I guess that' s what she should have, or should have it documented in some way, and that' s why they insist that all that be taken into account. Then
it gets a lot of attention. Even what you were saying. I also found it very remarkable when she says no. I' m not going to say what that sentence might be, because there are people who, before it ' s announced, already know it. And that leaves a glimpse, because there is also a great deal of doubt about the way in which the process
is developing and very sad. You don' t see anything desolate. But and I repeat as we have said with all peace over and over again in this program is not that we consider someone to be a and not to feel or to blame, but to be cloudy. I' m cloudy about all of this that' s seen over and over again in what way it'
s fully operating. It' s true this and I think the important thing is that here what I hadn' t done Hector' s part was exactly that they went out to have to expose all this, that lawyers came out to say this way, because it' s long and explained everything very punctually and there are so many things that didn' t stay in my head. But, then, they' re going to use the strategy that they used to have to go out to the media to make it all public, because
if we' re not going to be watching the situation. And it' s good that you' re already giving a voice in the media with the arguments that come out to the lawyer and that she says, for example, this issue that the girl was already coming what Amel said, because they' re things that at the time they I guess that Hector' s part of doing things the way they were supposed to do, without making this one cinder had said it and good that Ahorita comes out to the bogada and says no
good, you' re still like this and so, but that' s the sentence. I can' t tell you, because I' d let myself see. Another thing is the intelligence you' re not going to have to fight twice as hard as you' ve fought so far. Well, yes, this case seems complicated to me, but she said it. Moreover, she also says that she implies that they did approach her to buy it and she says no, because I do not sell myself. I' m loyal to my client and he still talks about seeing Hector Parra and so on.
Anyway, if I really do then go see that over there at the gossip channel and see to see that there are doubts on the other side, if there is evidence that could not be presented, if there are things that were not accepted. And yes, many contradictions sound to me. What you said about the age when he stopped seeing the dad why there wasn' t talk about, for example, that Alexa. The thing is, he asked for the most expensive phone, he wanted the car again, he wanted trips
that Hector Parra couldn' t give him. And there may be a manipulation out there. So do I. That could be you, too. How you see this one. This starts when Alexa is underage or older. I
don' t remember and the problem and the complaint. Let' s not forget that first it was a public media denunciation, a media denunciation was already of age and just the reason they claimed that they had done so at that time was that I wanted her to be an age when, by her own voice, she decided to denounce her dad That' s what Jimy said in all her interviews and all the rest said I didn' t say it before
this. We know it since she was little around six years old, and we hadn' t made it public until they were old enough to do it. That' s how they handled it as far as I' ve seen. Not then, because this was a great subject too because imagine you shut up something that ten twelve years and keep it? Save it? Save it? Until you say, okay, now you do? It' s so big, now say it already, now yes already? Let' s tell you everything that happened and then you get the questions of and of this age,
at this age in these ten years. Or if you want eight who were what happened then this girl kept living with a man who was hurting her more. And then notice that one thing they say sorry, one thing they say in not like gossip is that they' re going to try to find the nana, that the nana was always willing to cooperate with Hector Parra, because seeing her because that' s one of the contradictions. The child was always cared for by a nanny. However, how could something have happened to
her if the nanny was always there? The nana is the one who says, well, she never saw anything and then they say they' re going
to try to get this nana to interview her and hopefully get close. I think it would be a matter of raising it yourself and going to see, Madam, to person and say what is there, yes and perhaps there I say to you that what you would like to see is clear and convincing justice, because then, since all the evidence is really taken into consideration, you will be put on this table and in due course, if you are invalidated, you will be invalidated also by this, for this reason, and then
you will end up giving yourself a verdict against this man, as it will be. But let all resources be exhausted so that this becomes as clear as possible. As you say this Nana witness, it could be a very impotestigo nanny, very important, for go ahead and call her to speak, say And all that is protected one test with another, one test with another so that an accurate proper conclusion is reached. Look Guadeloupe Quintero, ask this question. We' re going from there to him. It is a temporality that
does not exist and will not exist. But ask my mantaya, what would have happened if instead of a magazine, they had denounced in such a way that Sergio Mayer didn' t get involved, that Jenny liked people. It is clear to me that it would be another story with all peace. Of course if they had gone to one instead of going to a magazine, they would have gone to that authorities, it would be more credible. If Sergio
Mayer hadn' t gotten involved, he' d be more credible. And Jinny Hofman is indistinguishing whether we like him or not The truth is that we don' t care She earns the public' s antipathy since she resorts to a magazine, since the audios are known, where she' s threatening her daughter, putting her father in jail, where her daughter is telling her no longer to talk to my dad. That' s where, but Ginny' s sympathy wouldn' t alter the facts. Here. That' s the
thing, but it didn' t exist that way. It was done this way because surely what was best for the one who denounces yes, apart from this kind of assumptions that no longer happened at that point. In fact, we don' t have a certainty about what would have happened either. Yeah, ' cause that can' t be done like it didn' t happen. There' s no way to know if it' s gonna work or not. However, imagine that it is how we take to an extreme or
a very exaggerated thing, as it is as you look at it. If I don' t know, if I don' t get a light, then maybe I don' t bump into the one that, well, you do have to start there. I would not have to pass a traffic light, a red one, I mean a stop, because certainly, if I do not do something wrong, I will not have consequences either. In other words, yes, the way in which this situation is made known is very
important. Of course it is important and, of course it does influence public opinion, but not as a personal rejection, but as a doubt such as exact doubt, exact Ephraim and me something that you notice, that has a lot that I want to comment and that is blowing my head, in the supposed case, and it would be for the girl to ally that something that you made wrong is wrong and that you do not know, because imagine love the snowball so big that it is already doing this more and more and more
and more and more and more, And yes it is already alienated and it is starting to have a news of light in its head telling him what happened. My dad' s in jail. This first audio is not good and others know that people are not going to judge it, because it is also
the issue. I don' t feel like we' re pointing at your mom all of a sudden, because it' s clear to us that you ' re a victim and I think it' s something that we should start seeing Alexa here in the media right now, because suddenly I do think that at some point it' s going to happen, it has to happen.
I have faith that she wakes up and says bom this something is not right and that she asks for help, because, of course, that she is alienated and something is happening weird, because the hypothesis of this girl who gave us the comment, because it is non- existent. I mean, that wasn' t like that. Sergio Mayer got into li threw out a magazine.
There was a lot of gossip. But to someone and if someone is around Alexa and wants to help her, to tell her you' re not alone, you' re not going to be alone, because imagine if this would change and take a turn of 180 degrees, the guilt of having blamed her dad and knowing that she can' t run there and that she' s going to betray her mom now, which was the one that alienated her and she can' t turn around to see her dad because now her mom ' s going to be angry, because I mean, Alexa isn' t
alone. And this I hope that this well annexa you are not alone. There are people who can help you and we are and I am speaking here in you antidistoy we cannot help because finally, justice and justice and if someone is a victim in this story, it is you of whom it is, but you are a clear dictum, of course and you have to know what there is to run for, because imagine and we have not reflected so already accused the dad and can not run there. If he comes back, what
' s going to happen to the mom? I mean, in the story, chimel that' s the analyst, she' ll tell us how she ' s gonna feel. It' s so completely plummeted where I turn from where I get exact is that it' s interesting what you' re saying. It' s very interesting. What would happen there? Don' t imagine. This is it. It' s been a long time. The fracture and squeaking began, from the moment a daughter is being forced to stand in the middle of a dad and a mom she must have loved or loved.
I don' t know right now what you' ll feel, but you must have loved them very much. One does not forget these audios that also met where she is defending her dad and asking her mom not to speak
ill of him. I mean, imagine, from there there there is already a lot of this problem and I think that this thing that Ephraim said is very important because there is also the other possibility that we have never ruled out, although sometimes they tell us that we do it and it is not so, that yes this guilty parent, but that then Alexta can also have the right to know that the process by which she receives this justice that she would
deserve if she was actually attacked in this way, is also given in a clean, transparent way and that to her neither leave any resquemor, already you leave the public opinion, or not her. Inside you say, of course, that all the evidence was presented, he was allowed to speak came I don' t know who everything and ends up proven guilty and that could also give him. Undoubtedly, the pain that she must be there will continue, but it would give her another kind of peace than the fact that this stays
as it is rare and that it always ends with the terrible doubt. That ' s not important. I think I do, yes, yes, yes, or I don' t think they' re telling us. Jessica says she' s not. I can' t find what you' re telling me. Says Lupita already saw the tweet. The economist says so. He put a fixed one where Alexa makes a statement saying that her mom was asking her questions and so she was putting her thoughts together. I' d love
you to tell me which user, because that' s not there. I don' t know where what you' re telling me is, but for me to look for it or send me to my ruff, Lupita Martinez on Twitter says María Magdalena. When you' re a victim. There are a number of behaviors that don' t check anything with this young lady. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, I' ve always said that. Alex is a victim of his mom and look who' s uh, but she
' s a victim. At the end of the story, he' s a victim wherever you look at him from his mom or dad who' s excellent guilty. Fray' s an idea. Exa girl must be scared to death. You' re right, Efra Baby is a scoundrel what this witch like lupita. In X you can see that writing where Alexa says that while her mom asks her questions, she remembers what happened Chris Cruz. I know I can see it in X but where X. In X there are billions of users, billions if you can tell me which user you are in.
So, I' m happy to go and find out why Monick didn' t say the word in disguise without Ginny' s revenge. It crossed Jin ' s boundaries, but it was the magazine. Indeed. Well, while they send me the user where I can look for what they' re telling me, what they say about alexa, because we' re going to talk about something else too because about Mayer who' s going to be in is
that it' s movie theater. What it' s gonna be. Ay no oy for sure, do not go look if something cannot be denied, it is that he seeks and seeks no and I say within everything, for we would say until then what enthusiastic entrepreneur wants to do things. I mean, we can' t take that from him either, because it' s
a reality. But, well, he' s going to be a play called Venegia under the snow, says it' s written by ay, I don' t know how it' s pronounced, please, this name pardon Gills dired and is produced by Christian Valadez under the direction of Jaime Estés and who' s going to starize her. Sergio Mayer and his wife Isabel Akamil. He says they' re very excited. She says that it is a French work and that it is very beautiful, very funny, that has very
deep dialogues, but also very nice. And so he talks about two couples, two couples who meet after a long time and are going to have some there I don' t know encounters, disagreements and so on. And it caught my attention because when I was reading the information what the work was about, it took me to many works, to many works that there are so couples and marriages and it seemed to me a little bit, like a story that seems as long as it is told. I don' t know what
it' s about specifically, but immediately. Mauricio Castillo, who is also going to be in this play, says no. These do not believe, that it is like all there is. That' s different. I don ' t know in what aspect and between the cast to see what they think Claudia Isaldi is and driver, but as an actress, I don' t know. I don' t know Maybe I think he' s acted on something, no, but at least monologues of the vagina. I think so. No. Ah well, that' s Perez it' s Atril'
s tea theater exactly and there they were all at the time. It' s also good Mauricio Castillo, who I already mentioned, Homero Ferrus tarray Ori. I don' t know what his name is Natalia Sutil and Victor Hugo Martin and Torlugo Martín. I remember a lot about him, who seems like a good actor to me. I haven' t seen him in a while, I don' t know what else he' s been doing recently. But there he is, because he' s already going to work on this.
Natalia Subtil, the mother of Sergio Mancher' s little granddaughter, and the couple are going to be there playing a couple in this play that then, to see how they do. I don' t feel very much like it, frankly, because I probably wouldn' t spend my money. There ' s such a good theater. I want to go see the wild God with Pablo Perroni at the Lucerne forum. That one I want to go see not to these things, not that I' m going to be seeing this man. Don' t go, dick We' re going and we'
re not going to see. Come on, it' s Saturday. Let ' s go Saturday, yeah, let' s go Saturday. And then there' s no time. And then we' re not going to give anything you already tell me, but no, listen to Claus Orgis. I was going to go pick up Gabriel García Márquez' s new book, but now that Mayer' s best seller came out, it' s no better Markse' s than that Chinese postponlo listen here I already found this. Thank
you, Elie Caballero. I love you, because the user is ng L one nine seven zero is the user and the economist is nicknamed, but the user is that, and then he says that there was a note that I guess is this magazine, because it is also those magazines. Who is going to but well, says Jinny Hoffman, who is currently involved in fools,
do not go to heaven. In other words, he left a long time ago, declared acer Diz that his sentimental partner, Héctor Parra, with whom he lived in Unión libre and had a five- year- old girl named Alexa, separated from it. The actress said things we' ve been talking about for a long time. We realized that we were best friends that couple was healthy to make the decision in time for the three of us and not to hurt us. There' s always been a lot of communication between us.
It' s a very mature decision. Valga, well, it' s good that you were friends if you didn' t already have three stab wounds on your back, the poor man. Really. Thank you for sending me. Yeah, yeah, frankly, then I don' t want to be friends with Jinny Hoffman anymore. In a little while, imagine he' s gonna tell you that you stole his wallet or something. Listen, yes, yesterday, for example, yesterday, by the way, I' m
going to ask you for an anecdote so that you do. I was already leaving the gym and a lady came back running on saw she was going to work on my keys. I didn' t leave them here. Yes, they were delivered here, but a bunch of keys from those eight hundred that I can' t afford, but no, I don' t know how
anyone can bring a keychain like that. But so little girl already gives them and still scolds the ladies of the reception is that why they didn' t give them to me, because because bo means, because we keep it no longer or totally that it is already leaving. Then he goes running, running, running, and I go down there with my suitcase, which the truth is pretty slow, my bag of rolls, because it' s very slow. And then there I go making horror because it' s old and then
it makes noise. I got to the parking lot, I paid for my return and the lady had already run away because I was in a big hurry and when I go down to my car, the lady' s wallet is not true, yes, and then I picked her up and said this wallet ah must be from the lady who ran out. And indeed, in the end we went out at the same time and I said listen to your wallet you threw it away. Thank you, friend, thank you so much Good
- bye. But when we do things, racing, as we lose everything, we forget everything, we leave everything, and that has absolutely nothing to do with the subject. But it does have to do with the subject, because there are details in life that we go unnoticed, like this note that this Twitter user is putting, or like some other things and surely like the nanny. There will be other people who have witnessed Alexa' s relationship with her dad, Jin' s relationship, and Héctor Parra' s relationship,
who can speak in favor. What I don' t explain to you is because now that you have this dialogue between Hector Farra and Daniela, I say this man Mayer and Daniela Parra on Twitter, he almost gives you the impression that you' re better off and you' re not moving, because if you' re not going to do any worse, imagine, it seems threatening to me. Not to see is terrible to see help me to the hero that while I teach them it. The dialogue is there, says Berenice.
Eugenia says lue to see yes, you read it. Please, Lupita. Monic said that Alexa must report Daniela because, when she was older, she did not report the wisdom that her father made against her sister, of which she witnessed. He noted, he did not report the uses his father made against his sister, of which he witnessed. Oh, yeah, that'
s it. And who is Monic or Monic is the one who extra in the interview of Chismeno Light Not if it is already, no, because not me what I saw was Nick. What we' re talking about is what the lawyer named Samara said, but not you. Who is Monito said who Exan should denounce Daniel I mean now there' s someone to see if they tell us who Monik is. Please, I don' t know the truth.
I would greatly appreciate it if you could tell us who Monich is, because he says he' s there now involving Daniel as Daniel is one He ' s given me a favor Listen, look, they' re going to go, they' re going to what he publishes. The economist also publishes an issue. Here' s what you guys were telling me and retweeting him
for that I' m seeing daniela parra. But it' s this user that I mentioned to you that the economist of the General Coordination of Expert Services is taking over and then it' s a statement from Alexa where she says what she was doing to me, because I was scared and I didn'
t want him to continue being part of my life. There was a problem at my grade of sixth grade, which was him and his partner, my sister and my mom got angry because they were the means to make themselves look like him and I saw that interview and because of how manipulated I was for him, I got mad at my mom. Imagine how manipulated I was with
him, I didn' t get mad at my mom. And after many years, my mom went to an event and they question her about the money and tell her if she doesn' t leave me, she' ll see me about the money. And she explodes and tells them that if not a father, he doesn' t do the crap he did. And that' s where everything I have to see explodes. And then this is the part that underlines the economist says and there is exploit that everything that I have blocked
everything. If you help me by asking and so I can put my thoughts together. It' s just the way I do it with my mom. She' s gonna ask me and I' m gonna remember that' s called inducing? By the way, I didn' t do that here,
but that' s called inducing? I don' t think I told you on Monday, but I also saw Pip in bed, which is that when they were many years old and I had it in mind when he was twelve years old, and that' s when he slept with me because in the night he would stick Pip in Pip Pipi and I didn' t mention it on Monday because I wasn' t calm and because I didn' t have that or I don' t know who I told about it to. I to repeat it many times And I don' t know if I told you
just don' t know what I gave one person and another. Exactly there is, yes, yes, that part where it is put are the statements and that is the issue that, because that is the things that leave in doubt. Yeah, listen, in myth, they already told us that Monic is a person who has a YouTube channel and, because he has very opinions that he defends a lot about all this. But good is someone who is
also on YouTube and who talks about it. What normally strikes us when we see someone else' s content is because she was there talking about some of the people involved, not because she gave an interview, because she commented how in this case Lumita is talking about that Chisme no like lawyer Samara appears talking about this case that is happening now. So that' s why we see
this. But what another communicator thinks, because it is of his perception, because it is already different, it is not too much of everyone exactly, because we will then review what is still going on in this case, because if it is an extremely highly controversial case, you know who Natalia Antonov is. Ah, well, it costs and tell me everything, please, no, I didn' t know, but I already knew because it' s this person' s what thing. Not changing the subject, by the way,
uh, changing the subject. And yet, each one comes out a new candidate, like you tend to not, like you say to see and especially in certain parties, but in general, anyway, then what you say is what' s not going to happen, what' s going to happen. Now we saw the other day learn to kiss, no, we already saw that to see Stegi always not. And now it turns out that good Ephraim, on which he sent us and I sent the note I was on another planet. I tell you to associate suddenly, but to see you tell
us you send her to? Turns out this girl, she' s a very bright girl, she' s not true. This was Achin. She didn' t go to Shartag many years ago with sharks, because she had a very entrepreneurial project in which what she did was do the homework to lazy people. So the project was that you sent your homework with an app and they demanded your tares. So your essay that your equations, that which comes your summary the fabric. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, that'
s what the thesis is. Then all the sharks said hey. If this comes to you, you' re realizing that you' re encouraging the egg shake. But leave the bollocks, i e, copyright. Theses are plagiarisms Those are copyrights. We' ve already seen how many cases I say forgive
some other guys and then all the sharks said I' m out. But the most beautiful thing of all is that this girl is a great entrepreneur who has sought to stand and then she is now going to be a candidate for deputy, nel or if she was a deputy, not something so difficult. Now part of voting, not citizen movement, that well, please vote for whatever you want, but citizen movement doesn' t. There shouldn' t
be so many parties anymore. In fact, and she' s already a federal talca, she' s a federal talca, she' s a federal talca, she' s a fright, why we' re gonna have these candidates, because I' m crazy, because I don' t know,
lot. I do not know why it will be, because we speak with but I think there' s an atri tendency here we use that word a all peace but a tendency to trivialize so many things, to diminish value to so many others and to have one thing as well as good, for each and every one is going to be worth And so, yes and not what there are also limits in life And we would not be, then good even
in language. That' s why we say that if we weren' t to be the Tower of Babel again, then there has to be something that narrows down life. And then this woman I don' t know how she comes to this possibility of having a candidacy. But you have made famous for having had the idea of doing something she defined, because I saw the fragment of your presentation in that that sent us Shark Tang' s ray, where she says, because ultimately moral but not illegal. It' s immoral,
but it' s not illegal. And that' s why I offer this service, that is, where we stand. But love when someone forgives, I mean, you' re not right, you know it' s immon,
it' s not illegal, because you know. I don' t know if it would be illegal, because that' s lying and that' s because it would be illegal to get a thesis, a university degree, because you' re falsifying a test, that is, you' re going to be a doctor or you' re going to be a historian, that is, without having the necessary knowledge, because you don' t know how to do it, you didn' t make your thesis, so you' re committing a fraud in the background and it' s a crime. I
think so. I think you and I just think it would invalidate you to get a grade, an exam pass, and a grade. Unquestionably because I am, I' m going to tell them. Me, for less than that. I have, I have failed people and I have discharged from a group and also touched you in my formation that was terrible, because besides, I was already a master' s degree at that time and that the teacher that I also do not know if I had done it here, but everyone
carries his class how he wants. But in front of the whole group, he picked up a colleague and told him to please withdraw, that he could not be in the living room and that he should be told about his discharge from the matter because he had plagiarized an essay no longer say of a thesis. I mean, that' s terrible. So she says that And what made me a little sad is that the comments I saw on this note were people who were good, but neither that the political parties were so straight nor
that the business told me. I swear it' s not that that' s going to be dealt with, because then all eyes are ticked, because there are some that do what they do, I mean, what answers so far and I said no, for what is the tannable, what, but how unfortunate, that this is the mentality no, that is how sad, because what clumsy it is, yes, seems to me very serious, very brave, but it is not, because since she went to Shart, all that said that she was very successful, that she did many tasks, that
she didn' t get enough, that she already had people helping her doing the tasks and so on. That' s me, because that evolves. No, and obviously, it' s something that' s not illegal at the time. But what we talked about the other day that we were doing the program of this ruin victory of the industrial revolution. There are things that
are not legal. Right now, because technology is gaining on us, but at some point it' s legislating and the laws are changing And this is that they have the carafe for an application at some point, it' s going to be illegal, that is, it' s going to happen. You have to hope not exactly good, because child or this saying goodbye to us I am very sorry. I' d love for us all to stay here until dawn, but we have to say goodbye to go to history in
history. Today we will soon have, as I told you a specialist who communicated with me today. I hope it' s tomorrow' s day for us to get this straight. What happens to the courts, how are all these things, these things, why? Why? We have so much doubt about this case. And some are others, maybe, but about this case especially, Hector Parra, Alexa Hoffman, Jinny Hoffman and Daniela Parra, Well, Alexa Parra, Well, she' s already changed her last name.
Thank you very much, Dr Amel, thank you very much. And, of course we go to history, in history, in a little bit more and at ten o' clock at night we see ourselves in soul clothes, in a live, uh, all live. Thank you, thank you very much, dear Ephraim, girls, thank you very much. How nice to be with you guys and it' s really hard to laugh at such serious things, guys, forgive us exactly, exactly. I think you want everyone back and thank you so much for joining us. Bye Bye,