Should we stop using the word "felon"? - podcast episode cover

Should we stop using the word "felon"?

Jun 12, 202434 min
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:

Episode description

This week, we're turning our sights on the word "felon", and looking into what it tells us (and can't tell us) about the 19 million people in the U.S. — like Donald Trump and Hunter Biden — carrying that designation around.

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy

Transcript

This message comes from NPR Sponsor Sony Pictures Classics presenting Run Lolo Run. The groundbreaking, high-octane cinematic sensation has returned to theaters in magnificent 4K. Don't let Lolo pass you by. Get tickets now at RunLoloRunFilm.com. We're going to go deep on a piece of language that is making our antenna twitch or is really sticking in our teeth. And so we figured we should turn our sights to felon.

Convicted felon, convicted felon, convicted felon, convicted felon, convicted felon Donald Trump. That is a convicted felon is now seeking the office of the presidency. That word is, of course, in the discourse because former president Donald Trump was recently convicted of a felony. And so now he has this permanent label felon affixed to him just like Mr. President.

And a lot of folks are really happy to stick that label to him, including people who might otherwise be skeptical of our criminal legal system. And obviously, Donald Trump's circumstances look very different from the 19 million other people in the US with felony convictions. I mean, 19 million. Which is about the population of the state of New York. But felon is a label that tends to stick to people. And it's a label that we often really enjoy sticking to people.

And I think I walked into the store and they said, you need an idea and I handed them that. And the guy looked at it and said, oh, you're felon. And I remember the shame my felon. My feeling was this guy has an opinion about who I am as a person based on that one five letter word. And so we're taking a look at that five letter word felon, which has a particular power to constrain people's lives.

And we're looking into what that word tells us and can't tell us about the millions of people carrying that label around. Support for this podcast and the following message come from Double Day. Publishers of Lessons in Chemistry. Be inspired. Read Lessons in Chemistry. The number one global bestseller with more than six million copies sold. Meet Elizabeth Zod, a 60's eros scientist who brings her smarts and unapologetic world of view to a TV cooking show that has the power to change lives.

Lessons in Chemistry is available wherever books are sold from Double Day. This message comes from Apple Pay. Everyone knows that credit card numbers can be stolen. But you know what's harder to steal? Your face. With Apple Pay, your purchases are authenticated by you thanks to Face ID, making your smile your signature. Just double-click Smile and Tap.

With each tap your card number and your purchases stay secured. Pay the Apple Way with your compatible device anywhere contactless payment is accepted. Support for NPR and the following message come from Betterment, an automated investing and savings app. CEO Sarah Levy shares why accessibility is central to Betterment's mission.

The real innovation for Betterment was taking a set of tools that were used by the ultra wealthy and making them accessible to the average investor. And that includes tech strategies, that includes dollar cost averaging. These are all sort of tricks of the trade. Learn more about automated investing technology at Betterment.com. Investing involves risk performance is not guaranteed. We figured we should start off with a dude who has literally used felon in his public name.

I performed under felonial smoke all over the world as a stand-up comedian actor, writer, fairly good dancer. Fairly good. My knees aren't what they used to be but I still, you know, I cut a little rough, smaller rough, Persian rough, prayer rough. But yeah, I've been known professionally as felonial smoke for a little over a decade.

You might have seen no more IG or don't stand up on TV. But we wanted to hit him up because he jokes a lot about navigating the world as a formerly incarcerated person. Do you remember the first time you were referred to as a felon? Yeah, yeah, yeah. You know, there's so many things that people can't ever relate to about coming home from prison and I hope they never have to.

But you don't feel like yourself whoever you were before you went in is gone. And I came home and I remember trying to cross the street and the cars were going so fast. And I can't tell you why the cars seemed to be going any faster other than I had not been on the road with a car. And forever. But I remember going into a place and I didn't have my ID. All I had was my ID card from prison.

And I had to use that. I think at the time I was still smoking cigarettes. And I think I walked into the store and they said, you need an ID and I handed them that. And I got looked at it and said, oh, you're felon. And I remember the shame I felt. Because I would have much rather just gave this guy a state issue ID got my cigarettes and went out and it been ashamed about the fact that I was smoking.

But now my feeling was this guy has an opinion about who I am as a person based on that one five letter word. And when I came home and that guy looked at my ID it struck me that I would never again be able to walk into a room as myself. I would always walk into a room as convicted felon. So a reef started performing under the name felonious monk when he'd been out for about a decade. He said a friend of his joked that he was a peaceful dude, a felon who wanted to be a monk.

He's also a joke though that he wasn't as peaceful as he seemed. He just knew that getting into fights would have landed in the back of prison. So yeah, we, you know, I leaned into it. So you can't use it against me. I think that was always the joke was I started doing that because Obama talked about doing coke in his book. And he still became president. And I was like, well, if he could talk about doing coke, I could talk about something.

And that's where we are. And so saying I was felonious monk made it easier for me to embrace that and not feel like I was hiding a part of myself. So that's a story of one person who came to this kind of begrudging acceptance of this label that he's carrying around. But we wanted to know why. What work is that label doing? What practical use is a word that includes everyone from a reef to El Chapo to Donald Trump? That is quite the spectrum. That's true.

I don't think that actually the fact that someone's been convicted of a felonious monk tells me anything about who they are. That voice you're hearing belongs to. Josie Defi race. I am a journalist and a writer primarily and I focus on the criminal justice system. Josie is the former president of the appeal and the host of the podcast, Unreformed. In particular, I focus on prosecutors and police and prisons. But in general, I'm interested in the ways that this system influences other systems.

Jean, you talked to Josie about the impact of the word felon. Let's get into it. So we're talking about the word felon. And I guess I just start with Donald Trump who is now being convicted of a felonious monk.

As somebody who has been trying to give people to think about our criminal legal system, I imagine in a moment like this, a lot of people who might otherwise agree with you or be open to listen to you, won't really try to hear about why calling somebody a felon is loaded, you know, because they were enjoying celebrating the fact that Donald Trump was convicted. Yeah, definitely. I mean, like one of the lessons of like messaging and communication is you have to meet people where they are.

And I did not spend a lot of time these past few weeks trying to remind people about why not to call someone a felon because it's people, it just, there was not a lot of space for people to hear that. And I, I understand that, right, at least in the immediate aftermath, like the day of, I was like, let me just be quiet. So Donald Trump is like hardly the median or modal person with a felony conviction in the US. And I wanted to talk to you about that.

Right. What, what can you tell us about how the material realities of this conviction might look different for him than it does for the millions of other people who are convicted of felonies?

Oh, drastically different. I mean, what we often see for people who have been convicted of felonies, they can't get a job, they can't get housing, you know, they fall behind kind of on every facet of their life, whether it's paying child support or paying their bills or, you know, becoming kind of part of civic society.

And that goes back to that they can't vote, right. So there's, there, there is a sort of societal death that happens to many people convicted of a felony, not everybody, but many people. And that's not going to happen to Donald Trump, right. He's not going to feel like he is suddenly on the outside looking in to the rest of people in, in a society who have the legal right to participate in the American experiment.

Right. He's not going to be left out of that. Right. He's going to raise $70 million after being. He's going to raise $70 million exactly. Right. And not even to your point, what you just said made me think, you know, there's this other element to this, which is like being convicted of felony makes you kind of a pariah.

Right. People are less likely to give you money, not more. People are likely to categorize you as being a bad person. Right. For most people, you kind of have to go above and beyond for the right. And you have to go above and beyond for the rest of your life to prove that you are not, you know, the worst of the worst.

And Donald Trump doesn't have to do that. In fact, he's benefiting from this other dynamic, which is that the fact that he's been convicted. He has a lot of supporters who think that that is evidence of him being the best. Right. And that's, that doesn't usually happen ever. I'm trying to think of other examples and I, I kind of can't.

Right. Also, obviously, yes. Donald Trump is like a very singular figure in American life in so many ways. For instance, the ways that most people get felonies in this country is they take plea deals. When they take deals because, you know, somebody throws a book at them. Exactly.

All right. We have like 10 charges against you. And so you got to kind of do this weird calculus. Right. If you're a defendant, like, well, can I beat all 10 of these charges? Right. The math is really bad. It's really against you. The math is really bad. Absolutely. That's, I mean, that is the secret to the system, right. And the truth is that we really do think of at least the charging part.

Like what were you charged with part of the criminal legal system as being kind of a science? It is not. And it is not even an art. It is a ball of chaos. And, you know, we have an incredibly inflated criminal code where basically like I can't, I probably can't find a, you know, statute that is going to let me arrest you for brushing your teeth. Right.

But there is, there are plenty of behaviors that happen in everybody's life where if they wanted to convict you of something, they probably could. I was just talking to someone the other day who said they're child forged. They're signature on like a school trip. A school trip. Yeah, a school trip form and they're like, they're a criminal lawyer and they're like, you know, that could be a charge. And I'm like, yeah, that's a problem.

That is like a sign of a problem that basically, you know, the criminal code is massive. It's bloated. And it's not way on purpose. Right. It gives prosecutors a tool to punish people in various ways for various behaviors. And it's usually used as an incentive to essentially ensure that people will take a plea deal because going to trials expensive.

And it takes a lot out of prosecutors and they would much rather you plea guilty. If you plea guilty, you can appeal. And then your case is over and we move on. But in general, like we prosecutors, I mean, the entire system is very invested in a good guys versus bad guys perception of society and of people because that is where they thrive. It gets much messier when you have to grapple with the idea that people have been convicted of a felony are also people.

In this image, we have of people being convicted by a joy of their peers is mostly from TVM movies because in real life, about 95% of all cases and in plea deals on the state level at the federal level that number jumps to 98%. So almost nobody ever goes to trial, which is another way that Trump is an outlier among people convicted of felonies. But what are the social repercussions of having all these people in our country who walk around with this designation of felon?

Yeah, I mean, there's so many and they're on so many different spectrums. But to your point, let's just talk about kind of the general social repercussion. You think about stuff you did when you were younger, like underage drinking or drugs or stuff that lots of kids are involved in and if they don't get involved with the system, they're not later calling themselves a criminal or a felon because they committed a felony technically.

You get that designation if what you've done has been adjudicated by a system and that isn't really necessarily reflective of what you've done. It's reflective of your involvement in this other thing. And the rest of us get to be different people than we were 20 years ago. But if you've been involved in the system, you never really get to be that.

You're just never really get to be that. You're explaining it for the rest of your life. So, you know, I wonder what we lose when we are constantly demanding that people who have already quote unquote paid their debt to society, a term I don't love, but let's just go ahead.

Then spend the rest of their life, you know, filling out a rental application or applying for school or wanting to be part of the PTA or applying to get pre-check at the airport and constantly having to answer the question, have you ever been convicted of a crime? Like, do you have any felony convictions? Part of the problem is that that question spans so many things. So it could mean you've done something actually extremely harmful or it could mean you've done something much, much smaller.

But in general, we come at the spectrum of human capacity for harm and the spectrum of human capacity for change with a binary. You're either good or bad, you're either criminal or not criminal, you're a felon or you're not a felon. Why do you think it's so sticky? Like, why do you think that that binary is so sticky for us? You know, farming out your sense of morality to a different system who gets to define it and punish for it is seductive.

It makes the world easier for us to process, right? And it gives us a shorthand with which to describe people. This person is a bad person because they're a criminal. This person is a bad person because they're illegal. And I think that people really like easy binaries as a rule. And I'm not above that either. But I would say before a couple of weeks ago, Donald Trump had not been convicted of any felonies. He was not a person with felony convictions.

And he was the exact same person. He had done all the exact same things. If you thought he was bad before, the fact that he's now been convicted in a court of law doesn't change that. I think that what he has done is harmful and is wrong. To me, that's a very different question than is what he's done illegal.

And I think even when we think about the case in Manhattan, I think prosecutors had a case. And I think on the list of things that Donald Trump has done that have been harmful, that was pretty far down on the list to me. And I think we get very caught up in what the law says is wrong. And we sometimes let it override what we know is wrong. And that, to me, is giving the legal system far too much power.

When we come back, the test of our lives is to be able to see ourselves and other people and to see ourselves and other people suffering. And to me, that's the only way that we can operate in a functional society is to be able to try to understand people who have done wrong. That's coming up. Stay with us. Support for NPR and the following message come from our sponsor Whole Foods Market.

Host the ultimate backyard barbecue with Whole Foods Market. It's the hot grill summer event through July 16th with sizzling sales on no antibiotics ever boneless beef ribeye steak and beef New York strip steak. Plus check out sales on sustainable wild caught Alaska Sock eyes salmon organic strawberries and more in a hurry. Choose grab and go favorites like picnic salads and sushi plus plenty of cooler friendly beverages. Make it a hot grill summer at Whole Foods Market.

This message comes from NPR sponsor Mint Mobile from the gas pump to the grocery store. Inflation is everywhere. So Mint Mobile is offering premium wireless starting at just $15 a month. To get your new phone plan for just $15 go to MintMobile.com slash switch. This message comes from NPR sponsor Bluehost. Try Bluehost Cloud. The hosting plan made for WordPress creators by WordPress experts with 100% uptime fast load times and 24-7 support.

Your sites can handle high traffic spikes. Visit Bluehost.com. Last year over 20,000 people joined the body electric study to change their sedentary screen filled lives. And guess what? We saw amazing effects. Now you can try NPR's body electric challenge yourself. Listen to updated and new episodes wherever you get your podcasts. Gene Parker. Coatswitch. We've been talking about the word felon and its implications with Josie Duffy Rice, a journalist who covers the criminal legal system.

And Josie argues that one of the reasons that felon is so seductive is because it occasionally gets attached to folks we really don't like. And while most people assume that the verdict would not really change people's opinions on whether they thought Trump was a good dude or a bad dude, one word was polled found in the immediate wake of the conviction that 10% of Republican voters said the guilty verdict made them less likely to vote for Donald Trump. Which is surprising.

I mean, caveat obviously saying you're less likely to vote for him doesn't mean you won't when it's time to cast your ballot. Right, exactly. But you know, 10% that's not small. And so I asked Josie what she made of that swing. You know, there is a large segment of our population on both sides who puts a lot of trust in faith and the law. And you know, I don't know what your group chats were looking like after he was convicted, but my extended family group chats just like,

I think, I think, God, nobody's above the law. And I remember this too after the Ahmad Arbery convictions, which happened over Thanksgiving when I was with my family. Like there is a real kind of solace and relief found in the idea that the legal system has convicted someone that we find despicable. And there is a kind of shot in Freud, which I get when they convict someone who has been thought to be above the law, right?

Who has been who has said I could go in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot someone and I wouldn't lose a single vote. And so I think that there that exists on the right as well that there are some people who think, well, the legal system ultimately determines who's right and wrong. And they have determined he's wrong. And so maybe he's wrong. So maybe that's the 10%. But I'm so curious as to like, how is his behavior acceptable to you before these 12 strangers told you it shouldn't be?

How were you justifying it? And I think in a lot of ways, that's a major way in which I find the system so insidious is that it allows us to justify behavior that has not been adjudicated in a court of law, right? In a way that I think again, farms our own kind of moral guidelines out to an arbitrary system. And all the ways that the trial for Ahmad Orbeez murder and Donald Trump's trial for campaign finance violations are different, right?

This point about the court being the designator of morality is sticks with me because one of the things both these trials seem to have in common is that the reactions we saw seem to be about resolving these bigger issues in society, right? Giving people a sense of relief for all these larger political and social questions that have not been resolved otherwise.

Like Ahmad Orbeez case is carrying the weight of every other time a black person has been killed by a white person in some racist incident. And Donald Trump's conviction this month is sort of a proxy for a lot of people for all the other things that they feel like he should have been punished for. Right. And so it's almost like the specific charges that at issue are there, but we're actually talking about something broader.

Right. I think that's exactly right. And I think another kind of major difference right between Donald Trump and the rest of the court. The rest of the country is that Donald Trump was the state. It was the executive, right? And so in the same way that if I get arrested tomorrow and go on trial, it is the entire state, right? That's what they go up there. There is the state versus the defendant is the entire government versus me.

But Donald Trump, it's a little messier. He's a private citizen right now, but he's a most powerful man in the country. And he might be the most powerful man in the country again. And so it is not accurate to to group him with the rest of defendants across the country regardless of his politics, right? Because he's not the same.

I mean, this is again, when OJ Simpson died, I saw quite a few people saying that they were annoyed that people were talking about him as if he was a killer because he was acquitted of killing Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman. And it was one of those things that was really fascinating. So watch because, you know, these are black people I'm talking about. It was like, oh, right. So we generally understand that the criminal justice system is a terrible terrible, arbitr of guilt, right?

Whenever a cop gets off, people are like, I'm not surprised because this is messed up.

And so in this case, people are like, well, this is the system of the term. And so obviously, right? We can't come to any other. I just thought I just think of some sort of underlines or illustration point about the ways that people sort of can like, oh, the criminal justice system has done a really good job adjudicating culpability in this case because it came out with an outcome that I like for whatever reason. But it is terrible because it came out that I don't like.

Exactly. No, that's such a good analogy with the adjacent thing because it's so true. And the truth is that a system that is just half the time and not just half the time or however you want to kind of a lot the percentages of that pie. That is not a just system, right? The fact that they sometimes agree with you does not mean in that situation. The system was just as much as I think it means that like the system is arbitrary.

And it doesn't have to get it wrong every single time to be kind of impermissibly flawed. Our system is not always capable of holding people accurately accountable for their harm. It's rarely capable of that. Donald Trump himself accused Hillary Clinton and the governor of Canada, the Virginia of trying to give people convicted of crimes. They're rights to vote back so they could cancel out the votes of crime victims and the votes of people in law enforcement.

They are letting people vote in your Virginia election that should not be allowed to vote. That is sad, so sad. And so Trump has been on the side of those people that support disenfranchisement for people like him now, people with felony convictions. Can you explain how this might play out for him? Like do you imagine that he'll ultimately be allowed to vote in Florida, which is where he lives now?

I actually think that he will probably ultimately be able to vote. I think the idea that you could not vote, but you could be president is like a flaw in the system. But it is a good example of how there is a real kind of belief that so many people have that it can never be them. Right? It couldn't be that Donald Trump talking about how people with felony convictions should not be allowed to vote is to me such a signal of the gap between who is allowed to get in trouble and who's not.

We are talking about someone who has flattered the law so drastically and it has never really crossed his mind. It could have been him. It never crossed his mind really. And I think with that says to me, it's just that like there are people who don't live in fear of the criminal justice system determining them to be a felon. And I think he was one of them.

This is the idea that you will never be on the business end of that policing and that prosecution, right? It's like, oh, because the people who are stopped are intrinsically and obviously criminal, right? I am not that. So why would I ever have to worry about the cops stopping me? Exactly. Exactly. I mean, like the example I think about without all the time is sometimes you see police chiefs or cops or sheriffs or prosecutors kids get in trouble.

I think in case I'm thinking of as a kid who was drunk driving and hit a van and killed a family, this was years ago and I can't even remember where but you know, killed killed people in the car and all the sudden the tone of his father change, right? It was not like this kid is

incorrigible is you know, unfixable and should go to prison for the rest of their life. They were old enough to know what's wrong. It was, oh my god, it's my kid. He's a kid. He did something. He made a mistake. He did something horrible. But he's a kid and I see it now because it's me. I think the test of our lives is to be able to see ourselves and other people and to see ourselves and other people suffering.

And to me, that's the only way that we can operate in a functional society is to be able to try to understand people who have done wrong. I think the Donald Trump, this current, the case he just got committed and it is kind of interesting because I don't think, I'm trying to say this without justifying anything he's ever done. But I understand why he, I understand that to him, it feels political. And what he is identifying is the arbitrary nature of what it means to be prosecuted.

Absolutely. You made the point that this category of crimes we call felonies is so large as to be essentially meaningless like something might be a misdemeanor in one place that there might be a felony somewhere a couple miles away. People who have felonies include people who have never spent a moment behind bars and people who are suffering consecutive life sentences and supermax presents. Like Josie, is there any utility in the word felon? Like do we need a different word altogether?

I don't think there's any utility in the word felon. I don't think there's any utility in it. I think with more specifics about what that felony is, it might tell me something about someone. I think in general what I'm interested in is identifying people with people first language even to say and it doesn't feel like a major thing. To describe someone as a person who's been convicted of felony versus a felon is to say that they are a person that has dealt with this thing.

That's like seven words versus one right? But that's because because they are more than this one thing. It's more complicated language because people are more complicated. And like we said, there are 19 million people marked by this label. So we wanted to circle back to Arif Shaheed. He's a comedian we heard from before who is known as felonious monk. I've been home 26 years. I did a show in 2017 in Washington DC.

I did a great show. The previews were great. It was the most draining experience in my life because I had to tell the truth about myself. But the Washington Post did an article and I remember they didn't just review the show. They came out and they talked to me. And I thought they asked really good questions. And then the headline said former drug dealer wants to say more than sorry.

And it hit me that as a father of two, every nominated TV show, movie, theater, stand-up comedy tours, no former drug dealer. We asked Arif what we should do about this word. And I think if we're going to use felon to say none of you get opportunities until you've proven yourself, sure. But that's not how it's used. That's not how it's used when a guy from Stanford can sexually assault a woman behind a trash can and only do six months because the judge says, I'm trying to protect your future.

And I guess I don't have one. I've been home long enough. I've had enough success to just kind of wash it away. But I think if we're going to use those terms without context, especially in this country where race, ethnicity, sexuality, gender presentation, all of those things can be held against you, then you add felon to it.

I think we need to, especially in our community, I'm a convicted felon, ex felon, I think it's time to put it away. I've had this conversation with my manager a lot that I just don't want to be known as felonious monk anymore. Simply because I think people are using it for the wrong way. It's like Dave Chappelle's, I think they're laughing at the wrong part of the joke. And that's kind of how I'm feeling now. It's like, all right, I don't want to be associated with Donald Trump. He's a felon.

Wait, so you're thinking about changing your name? Yeah, I think I'm just using my real name. It's a beautiful name. I have a good name. It's not like a reef shaheed is a bad name. It's not like it's forgettable. It's just, I thought felonious monk was funny. I thought it was a tongue and cheek kind of thing.

Using that word, I've reclaimed it, I've given it the power that I felt like it should have, but there comes a time where it's out of your control. And once it gets out of your control, it can be used against other people. And that's where I'm starting to look at, okay, do I want everything to be felonious?

I'm on this podcast likely because of my experiences. I can speak to it, but I don't want it to continue to be the first thing that people know about me. And it's hard for that not to be the first thing they know when you present as high. I'm felonious monk.

So, not only do I think other people need to reconsider the connotation when we use it, but I think it's time for the people who revel in having turned their lives around to say, yeah, that's a thing. That's a part. That's one of the things on the list. But primarily, I'm a dad. I'm a husband. I'm a very funny person. I'm a silly guy. I'm a regular person, most of the time. I get it with excellent fashion sense. We can't see you. That's why I said it. Can't check me.

So, Jean, has it changed your mind about the word felon? I mean, Parker, listen to both Arif and Josie remind me of how in our other word watch conversation, sometimes the issue with whatever language you're talking about is that the language in question is just not specific enough? Right. When you all talked about the acronym BIPOC and how it flattens a bunch of different populations into one big category, perhaps too big of a category to be practically useful.

Exactly. That seems to be a big part of what's going on with felon. I'm not saying that people should not be held accountable for the harm they've done, but we had this word that only tells us in the broadest and vagus possible way that this person has been determined by the criminal justice system to have transgressed in some way. We possession, spree shooter, they're all in the same category.

And you don't know from the word felon what accountability should look like relative to the transgressions. Exactly. There's just punishment, right? We just know that this person should be punished. And leave Trump aside. He's been able to struggle like so many labels, right? Why would felon be any different for him? Also, probably going to be able to vote. He's probably not going to go to prison on these charges.

But for some, the kind of moral satisfaction that comes with getting to refer to him like, you know, in the hugeest of quotation marks, lowly common criminal, even if no other consequences come his way, that's also what gives felon its sting and stickiness for the millions of other people we call that. So maybe we should be more mindful of how and when we're using it. All right, Joe. That is our show. You can follow us on Instagram at MPRCoastswitch.org.

If you want to support us, if you want to support us, go to MPRCoastswitch.org. If you want to support us, go to MPRCoastswitch.org. The episode was produced by Christina Calla. It was edited by Courtney Stein. Our engineer was Josh Null. And we'd be remiss if we did not shout out the rest of the codes which massive. The exhibit Lopez, Jess Kong, Leah Denella, Daya Murtata, Verland Williams, and Laura Deezeraga. As for me, I'm Gene Demby. I'm B.A. Parker. Hi, Dre. Be easier.

This message comes from MPR Sponsor, the Capital One Venture Card, earned unlimited 2x miles on every purchase, plus earned unlimited 5x miles on hotels and rental cars booked through Capital One Travel. What's in your wallet? Terms apply, see CapitalOne.com for details.

This message comes from MPR Sponsor Shopify. Shopify is the global commerce platform that helps you sell at every stage of your business. From the Launcher Online Shop Stage to the first real-life store stage, all the way to the, did we just hit a million orders stage? Shopify is there to help you grow. Sell without needing to code or design. Just bring your best ideas and Shopify will help you open up shop. Sign up for a $1 per month trial period at Shopify.com slash NPR.

All that sitting and swiping, your body is adapting to your technology. Learn how and what you can do about it. I really felt like the cloud in my brain kind of dissipated. Once I started realizing what a difference these little breaks were making, there's no turning back from me. Take NPR's Body Electric Challenge. Listen to the series wherever you get your podcasts.

This transcript was generated by Metacast using AI and may contain inaccuracies. Learn more about transcripts.