People are grappling with climate anxiety, looking for resources, looking for other people who are experiencing it. And it's a little different from, doing research on like Twitter or TikTok or Facebook or anything where people are posting, because it's not like they're not trying to signal anything. They're like earnestly looking for resources
Good morning, good afternoon, or good evening wherever you are in the world. This is the Climate 21 podcast, the number one podcast, showcasing best practices in climate emissions reductions, and I'm your host global vice president for SAP, Tom Raftery. Climate 21 is the name of an initiative by SAP to allow our customers calculate, report, and reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.
In this Climate 21 podcast, I will showcase best practices and thought leadership by SAP, by our customers, by our partners and, by our competitors, if they're game, in climate emissions reductions. Don't forget to subscribe to this podcast in your podcast app of choice, to be sure you don't miss any episodes. Hi everyone. Welcome to the climate 21 podcast. My name is Tom Raftery with SAP and with me on the show today, I have my special guest Kate. Kate, welcome to the podcast.
Would you like to introduce yourself?
Sure. Thanks, Tom. my name is Kate Yoder. I work as a staff writer at grist, where I cover climate change with a focus on language, culture, and history.
Fantastic. And this is an aspect of climate that we've not covered in the past, particularly language. and I think it's important because, one of the reasons that I set up this podcast was because there's a lot of bad news out there about climate and not enough good news. So I try and focus and highlight good news stories and we're into 70 something episodes of the podcast now. And each of the past episodes have all been good news stories, and I think that's important.
And I think you think the same, right?
Yeah, definitely. And I think that's something we do at Grist as well as we focus on, climate solutions, climate justice, and these concepts that can give people a little bit more hope. But yeah, in general, I think that it's not that these good stories don't exist, but just that the balance is off where, there's so many articles about, ice sheets, melting and hurricanes and wildfires, and all these things are happening and we need to be talking about them.
But instead of that, being like 90% of the coverage, it needs to be more like, 50 and 60 with the other 40% or more looking at, how do we actually address these problems. How do we take action on climate change? What is already happening that people aren't hearing about?
So I think that podcasts like yours and other efforts, like it are, you know, a really important piece of sort of changing this narrative so that people don't get just bogged down in doom and gloom and, you know, we've flow past the climate deadlines. And there's nothing that can be done because there still are so many things that can be done. So yeah.
Great. And we face a problem in that. And I think there's a, a saying in the media that if it bleeds, it leads, which, you know, essentially means that it's typically the bad news stories that make the headlines and not the good news ones. So that that's something that we've gotta kind of counteract because we're seeing very much now the rise of what's being termed climate anxiety. I was at an event in the north of Spain, a couple of weeks back in a place called A Coruña.
And I gave a talk there and a woman came up to me afterwards, and she said, look, she has a 14 year old daughter. And she said, the daughter frequently breaks down in floods of tears crying because of the climate anxiety that she has. And she was looking for, you know, sources of good news that she could put in front of her daughter. I've read a lot about climate anxiety but this was the first time I'd been faced with it as an actual reality. Sure reality.
Have you come across stories like that yourself?
I, I definitely don't think that's an isolated incident and, you know, we have a lot of evidence pointing to the fact that climate anxiety is happening more.
I know that, you know, researchers have looked at the broader mental health impacts of climate change, which range from, you know, like post-traumatic stress disorder after going through like a hurricane or a wildfire, these other, like, there's this really, really broad, range of mental health effects that don't get talked about as often as anxiety.
And I think there's not as much, professional agreement around what climate anxiety is, partially because it's this catchall term that, sort of encapsulates all the emotions that people feel when they're confronted with climate change. So that could be worry, fear, anger, grief, despair, obviously, you know, anxiety as well. And you know, a lot of researchers say that this is a completely reasonable, rational response. Like there's nothing wrong with you if you're feeling this way.
And I think that's a really important point to start with on climate anxiety, because, too often, we see mental health as a person's individual problem when climate anxiety is really linked to, government inaction and things like that. But the indications we have that this is happening more, for one, you know, I'm really interested in language and terminology.
So I sometimes track terms on Google search and, you know, we've seen over the past, two years, like a massive increase in Google searches. Last fall I wrote a piece and it had increased over 500% from the previous year. And then I looked again, you know, early this month and we saw like an even higher, like a staggering new high last month.
And I think this is really interesting because this shows that, people are grappling with climate anxiety, um, looking for like resources, looking for other people who are experiencing it. And it's a little different from, doing research on like Twitter or TikTok or Facebook or anything where people are posting, because it's not like they're not trying to signal anything. They're like earnestly looking for resources. You know what I mean?
So, and then the other thing is that there was a survey last year, that looked at, I think it was 10 countries worldwide. And it was really the biggest, study on climate anxiety in young people that we've seen. And it looked at teens and young adults and actually 45% of them said that they were, that climate anxiety was affecting their lives and their ability to function. Um, so yeah, that was, that was really high.
A lot of, I think it was more than half of, people who responded to the survey thought that humanity was doomed, at least to some degree, which is pretty depressing. And in general, you know, young people felt betrayed by their governments. They felt that, their concerns were often ignored and dismissed by adults.
So that was a study that got a lot of attention and I think sort of drew attention to like the huge numbers of this problem in a way that, you know, it hadn't really been studied that widely before. So I think that was surprising to a lot of people.
Interesting. Interesting. I grew up Kate in the 1980s and during that time, the big scary issue was that there was going to be a nuclear war. And, you know, we had films like the day after and things like that come out and, then Terminator and you see the starter Terminator in all the houses being blown away in a massive nuclear war. Is this climate anxiety any different from the kind of anxiety that I grew up with in the eighties over that we were all gonna die in a nuclear war?
I'm not sure I haven't actually studied, you know, nuclear war anxiety. I've definitely heard comparisons over the years. And in the same way that there are films showing a nuclear apocalypse. Now we have films. Like don't look up that are, you know, a metaphors for the climate apocalypse. So, I mean, there's definitely some similarities there.
But I feel like it is a little bit different than nuclear war and that it's a bit of a slow burn where, you know, every year you're seeing more and more disasters and it's not, you know, a, I mean, I guess I don't know enough about nuclear war, but it seems more like it would be a concrete. You can, 100% attribute this event to nuclear war.
Whereas with climate change, you know, scientists look at the models and say like, well, you know, climate change made events like this 80% more likely or 40% or whatever the number is. So it's a little bit more abstract in that way, but it's also, you know, all encompassing sort of like a nuclear war. So
And I guess that, I guess the nuclear war one was, it might happen. Whereas climate change is actually happening
Right. Yeah. It's already here, so, but that's a good point.
what can we do to alleviate some of that anxiety?
Yeah, it's really interesting. I think because the common response is that, you know, we need to move from, from anxiety to action. And I think that can be, you know, motivating for a lot of people. There's some truth to that. Like if you're feeling anxious, you could go to a protest or, you know, write a letter to your Senator or, you know, make changes in your lifestyle if you're able to, to like lower your personal carbon emissions.
But I do think that that's sort of like, I don't know, it almost feels a little bit surface level to me for this problem that's so deep and complex. Like obviously more systematic solutions are needed here because the world as it's set up in right now, the world as it's set up right now, isn't, it doesn't make any of these things easy.
Like we don't have the right incentives to, have everyone switch to electric vehicles within 10 years or , you know, all of these things that would, address climate change are really bigger than an individual person. but you know, I do think that, Well, I guess there's sort of two directions. One is just that, you know, our healthcare is kind of poorly positioned to deal with these mental health impacts of climate change. And it really needs to, be reenvisioned to address that.
I mean, one thing that will make action more possible is people believing that it's possible. And so in that way, we need to change the narrative around. You know the balance of what people are hearing overall about climate change.
Fair. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I remember, back in 2017, I think it was, shortly after. Trump was elected president or inaugurated as president my anxiety levels started going up and one of the, steps that I took to try and manage that was a, I stopped using Facebook and B on Twitter I just typed in a mute term, for my feed. And it's the only mute term that's in my feed in Twitter and it's Trump.
And within a very short space of time, my news feed on, on Twitter changed dramatically and I wasn't on Facebook anymore. And so the information that I started getting in changed. And that changed my outlook. So I wonder, is there any way that we can help people? Well, one of the things I'm doing is I'm trying to put out more positive stories on this podcast, but can we help people to change the way they're taking in information?
Yeah, I think that's a really important part of this, especially because social media, as we know it is really linked with, a lot of bad outcomes for people, both in terms of personal life. Like you're comparing yourself to this, idealized life that other people are posting about on Instagram or whatever, that doesn't really reflect reality. It's like the, the edited, like the Photoshop pictures of the models and on the poster, you know what I mean?
But then, you know, also we know that outrage spreads a lot on social media, really strong opinions, you know, it's like, no wonder we're living in such a polarized society. When the things we see the most of are like the farthest left or the, farthest right. And you know, we're not seeing as much middle ground or as, as many people who are like, well, I'm concerned about climate change, but I don't really know what to do about it.
Or I'm kind of standing on the sidelines right now and you know, wanting to do something, but really what can an individual do? So I think there's, , I think there's that sense of, in addition to, you know, journalists and editors, maybe wanting to cover, these like headlines about the terrible things that are happening. There's also this sense that on social media, maybe the right things aren't necessarily spreading.
Yeah. Yeah. We're hearing the, the rise of the, term doomism as well, for people who aren't aware, could you talk a little bit about what that is and you know, what we can do about it?
Sure. So a doomer is basically slang for someone who, has sort of a fatalistic outlook about climate change. Um, they have the belief that it's already too late. And this word doomer started popping up a couple years ago. and I know because I actually, I keep track of the new words in the climate change space that emerge each year
So it's riffing off the Boomer term, is it?
It might be, I don't know. I mean, it also comes from doomism, but I do think that like the, the slang, like, you know, there was okay boomer, then it became okay Doomer. So there is a sense of a riff happening there. And so basically, this is the belief that the world is kind of headed for straight up collapse. You know, we've blown past these deadlines on climate change, so why even bother trying to stop it now?
And you know, I think it's important to note that that belief isn't grounded in climate science, you know, climate scientists say that every tiny increment of a degree matters. And, you know, there might be some, you know, effects of climate change that are irreversible or locked in, but that's not like a signal to give up. That's a signal to like save
Fight hard, fight harder.
from yeah, exactly. Save the planet from the rest of the irreversible impacts, you know, like there's, there's a huge spectrum there. and I think people. they look at what's happening already and see it's catastrophic and don't realize like, well, there are many degrees of catastrophe that are worse than this and where we end up is still, to be determined.
And, the way that the economy has changed in the past decade has really, driven us away from the very worst impacts, like the price of renewables and, like the car industries, growing. Interests in electric vehicles and producing them. I mean, there's, I don't think we talk about enough that like the very worst, like uninhabitable earth, very worst scenarios are now looking a lot less likely than before.
Fair point fair point. And if we want to get people to change their actions, to help move the agenda in the right direction, what's the best way to do that?
I think that's sort of, you know, a million dollar question, right? and it's not just on individual people, right. We're looking at industry, we're looking at politicians. it's not, I mean, you know, in the future, people will have to live differently, but will that have to be a sacrifice? Will that be. Better, you know, you're living in a more walkable city. The air is less polluted. I think there's a lot of questions around lifestyle change that are, still to be figured out.
And that's sort of a really difficult place to start because you know, our habits are so ingrained. and they, they can definitely change, but it's, gonna be a challenge for sure. and there's gonna be some growing pains, I think. But, I mean, overall, you know, what are growing pains compared to , you know what we're looking at? If we fail to make them
I, I
I laugh because I'm uncomfortable, but yeah.
I, I think, I think realistically. Personally, I think that the amount of change that's required is unlikely to happen from us taking individual actions. I mean, I have got solar panels on the roof and I drive an EV and I don't eat much meat and I certainly haven't eaten beef in a decade or more, and I've cut down in dairy and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on. But you know, that's not really going to make a huge difference. I do it because I want to do it.
But what needs to happen is massive structural change at a societal level. And to my mind, the only way that that will happen is if politicians take action and mandate it happen, just do, would do with the, the traditional carrot and stick, uh, route where you give big incentives for change. Then you also put fines in place for non-compliance without something like that, we're not going to see the change that needs to happen happen. The good thing is that can happen.
The challenge is it hasn't happened. Really anywhere to date . So, but it can happen. I think I, I think, I think the, the, the big action that we should be taking is to vote, to vote for candidates who have the strongest climate record, or climate agenda.
Yeah, I think that's super important. I've seen analyses. It's really hard to calculate, but people try to calculate what is, the, the carbon footprint impact of voting and they're like, it blows all of these other changes you could make out of the water, even just with one vote, you know? So, but I, I would add that. I, I think what you're saying about the carrot and stick thing has happened to smaller degrees.
It just hasn't happened to the larger degree that we need to actually see the pace of change that we want. Right. But even, you know, even with president Biden's election, even though, they've passed smaller, climate change related bills and they haven't obviously passed, build back better and the really ambitious climate plans that you know, anyone who cares about the climate was hoping that that would pass.
Um, you've still seen, changes in industry as a result of like these signals coming from the white house that like, you know, the car industry can't count on having, lax fuel efficiency standards for much longer or you know, I think there's kind of a, a sense where that carrot and stick can kind of become like a self-reinforcing feedback loop. As the industry sees things as more possible, then the governments feel like they can implement them. And then that drives further change.
So I do have hope that, you know, even if this doesn't happen all at once, it'll sort of start accelerating in the next decade. And I guess we'll see what happens with that.
And should we rebrand climate change? Would that fix anything?
I think that's a great question. People often talk about the word climate change and they say, you should call it a climate crisis, a climate emergency. Um, initially it was called global warming and people are using that a lot less than they used to, but, you know, there's, there's, you could criticize any of these terms. I think that, global warming has been criticized for sort of sounding too nice.
Like what if we like warm summer days and climate change has been criticized for, being too neutral, like change isn't necessarily a bad thing. and. I think there is something to calling it a crisis or emergency, but I do think that's like a surface level change, in the way that we're talking about climate change and that it's more often says more about the speaker than like the reality.
There's been some studies and they show that, or at least the most recent study I saw showed that it didn't really make a big difference on readers. If an article said climate crisis or climate emergency. One small finding they did find was that articles that mentioned climate emergency were, perceived as less credible by audiences as if they were more biased.
So yeah, I do think that, climate change could use a rebrand, but it's difficult because whatever you say will sort of reach a different audience, right? Like if you say climate crisis, Climate justice, green new deal, like that's really activating or at least ,it has been maybe not at this current moment when activists are, I think, feeling a little bit disappointed. but that, you know, really speaks to progressives and marginalized groups.
But on the other hand, if you say those same terms to a Republican Senator, they might be like, I'm actually not going to pass this legislation. Whereas if you said something about extreme weather, And, you know, community resilience, they would be like, oh yeah, we have seen a lot more flooding. Maybe we should, you know, redesign our cities to , you know, so there's, there's these strange, strange dynamics that happen because climate change has been so politicized.
I think, and one thing that I do think would be helpful is if
Okay.
you know, the climate movement did a better job of naming it, what it was actually trying to accomplish. You know, you so often hear terms like fight climate change, address, climate change. It's like, what does that really mean? Like, what is your end goal? Do you want to stabilize the climate? Do you want to protect communities from hurricanes and wildfires? One of my, uh, pet peeves.
And partly it's because I'm from a pacifist background is when people say the war on climate change, because it's like, we're not fighting the climate. We need to work with it. Like, the, climate's doing a good job. It's just that, you know, we're pumping it full of these things that are making a little bit crueler to us a lot, bit crueler to us.
we're geoengineering the planet.
yeah, exactly. So yeah, instead I think it's really important to talk about, how we wanna keep the planet habitable for everyone, or I don't even know what the exact wording is, but just trying to be specific about what you're actually trying to do and not just like signaling that, like, yes, I care about climate change, but going a step further than that.
Yeah. I remember shortly after president Obama was elected his chief scientific advisor, John Holdren said that global warming to your point was too, too soft a term that it sounded almost like a nice thing and that we should use some terminology like global climatic disruption, which you said is far more accurate, but on the other hand is a bit of a mouthful. So , I, I think it's challenging to come up with the right language for it.
Yeah. And yeah, as an editor and writer, I, I want to spice up my writing sometimes. So I'll say things like the overheating planet or, you know, sometimes I'm like, is this a little cheesy? Is this a little bit of a mouthful? But I think it does, you know, when you use something different, at least, you know, makes people, maybe stop and think like, wow, the planet is overheating. You know, it's just like a little different, whereas climate change, we just glaze over it.
And I don't know if that's good or bad, but it is an effect that happens.
Interesting. Interesting. So should we change the way we talk about climate change and, and who's responsible for environmental problems.
yeah. I've actually, I've discovered that a theme that I've been writing about without really realizing it over the past, several years is responsibility. Because I think the questions we have about, you know, what needs to be done and who needs to do it often come back to this question of, who is responsible for the problems we're facing.
And, you know, if you look back at, the history of how corporations have of addressed environmental problems, they've often shifted the blame to individual people. And you can see this over kind of a range of things. The oldest one that I know about is when, cars were taking over the streets after carriages. The streets used to be shared by everyone, you know, pedestrians were walking and they probably weren't even seen as pedestrians.
Then they were just people, you know, but, what, they discovered once automobiles got on the road is that there were a lot of deaths of, people who were in the streets because cars were hitting them. And there was sort of this chaos. And in that moment, the car industry, said. They, they came up with this term jaywalking, which wasn't a thing up until then. And they like brought, they got the boy Scouts of America to like hand out, warnings. Are you a jaywalker?
And , they got these lovers of society to turn this into an individual problem. The problem wasn't the cars on the street, so that people were in the way and that they were crossing at the wrong places. And you see that around, you know, the idea of the, the carbon footprint, which I talked to, the professor who originally came up with the idea of an environmental footprint as sort of this bland thing.
And then gradually saw how, companies like BP were popularizing the phrase because they saw that,
It got them off
yeah, it got them off the hook. It shifted the blame. And then you see that again with, well, a little bit earlier than climate change, but with the plastic crisis, because it was, you know, all these, companies like Coca-Cola and others that were involved in the manufacturing of plastic bottles had this huge campaign around littering that's, you know, ongoing.
Where it's instead of thinking like, wow, maybe we shouldn't be manufacturing all this plastic, you know, only 10% of which will ever be recycled according to our research. Maybe we shouldn't be manufacturing this and blaming people for, you know, littering when most of it's gonna end up in the dump or, the oceans anyway. And so I, I found that these, you know, articles really resonated with people and they were interested, interested in them. I think, because we don't often.
Think really about those frames. It's just sort of taken for granted that, you know, our carbon footprints are, you know, our individual responsibility and that we need to not litter. And it's like, yes, those, those have some degree of truth to them, but you know, there's a whole irresponsibility problem there in terms of who contributed to the crisis most.
I think it's, it's tempting to just point the finger at corporations and say, like fix this but you know, at the same time, they're operating in this world that is currently set up in a way that, you know, makes doing the right thing, really difficult. I mean, the profit motive, right. That's slowly changing around green issues, but it's, this shared question of like, how do we find ways to hold people accountable while still moving forward on this issue?
Because I think there's a sense of like the climate movement wants to be proven right. We wanna say like, I believe in science, but at the same time, like saying that what does that say about people who don't believe in science? Like you're kind of drawing divisions where maybe you don't need to, and you need to be asking questions.
So yeah, I think, I don't know really what the answer is, but I think there needs to be a change in how we talk about responsibility and environmental problems and that we really need to pick our priorities wisely.
Cool Kate we're coming towards the end of the podcast now, is there any question I have not asked that you wish I had, or any aspect of this we haven't talked about that you think it's important for people to be aware of?
Um, one thing that comes to mind at the moment is just, well, you, you've already mentioned sort of this focus on collective action, but I also say in terms of the, changes that we can personally make. I like to think of, there's these studies that show that you can make the biggest difference with people that you know well, so this is like your friends and your family, the people you're, you're close to, those are the people that you have the most sway with.
So if it's, whether it's like convincing someone to vote or, you know, even changing your behavior, like I'm vegetarian. I love cooking incidentally. Like the people I live with also eat a lot of vegetarian meals. Um, , you know, there's this, there's this sort of sense.
I think that we should focus on our friends and our family before strangers, and just, stay away from, from belittling people who don't think like you do, because I'm not sure really what, what good that's gonna do at this point.
Fair point fair point. Super Kate. That's been fantastic. Thanks a million for coming on the podcast. If people want to know more about yourself or about climate anxiety or any of the things we discussed in the podcast today, where would you have me direct them?
Well, if we wanna find more about climate anxiety, you can Google it. Like apparently everyone else is doing. Um, probably Google it along with the word resources, if you want to find help. And you can read about my work at, or I. So you can just read my work generally at grist.org. I'm also on Twitter, which, you know, we've talked about the, the problems with social media, but if you are already on there, you can find me. My handle is @KateMYoder.
Fantastic. Kate that's been great. Thanks a million for coming on the podcast today.
Yeah. Thanks so much, Tom. This was great.
Okay, we've come to the end of the show. Thanks everyone for listening. If you'd like to know more about Climate 21, feel free to drop me an email to Tom dot Raftery @ sap.com or connect with me on LinkedIn or Twitter. If you liked the show, please don't forget to subscribe to it in your podcast application of choice to get new episodes as soon as they're published. Also, please don't forget to rate and review the podcast. It really does help new people to find the show.
Thanks catch you all next time.
