Support for this show comes from Polestar. Polestar is an electric performance car brand that is focused on innovation for both cutting-edge technology and design. And their all-electric SUV, Polestar 3, is for those unwilling to compromise. For those who believe they shouldn't have to choose between the spacious comfort of an SUV and the agile handling of a sports car. For those who need an intuitive infotainment system and a dashboard designed with minimalism in mind, Polestar 3 is for drivers who won't settle for anything less. Book a test drive for Polestar 3.
At Polestar.com. Think scaling AI is hard? Think again. With Watson X you can deploy AI across any environment. Above the clouds helping pilots navigate flights and on lots of clouds helping employees automate tasks. On-prem so designers can access proprietary data and on the edge so remote bank tellers can assist customers. Watson X works anywhere so you can scale AI everywhere. Learn more at IBM.com. Slash Watson X. IBM. Let's create.
From the Vox Media Podcast Network, this is channels with Peter Kafka. That is me. I'm also the Chief Corresponder of Business Insider. And if you've been listening to this show, if you've been reading the stuff I've written, if you've read anything about the election, you've heard about the podcast selection, you're at the manosphere, you've heard about the rise of right wing slash conservative podcast.
And we can tie all those up with one guess. This year with me today is Chris Balfe. He runs Red Seat Ventures. Welcome Chris. Thank you. Thanks for having me. I did get your name right, right? You got it. Nailed it. I've known you for a long time. I met you when you were working with Glenn Beck back in the days. Yeah, maybe 2006 or something like that. So maybe almost 20 years. Oh my God, world.
Yeah, explain to listeners what it is that you do at Red Seat Ventures. Yeah. So we work with creators and help them build their digital businesses. So that means everything from podcasts, YouTube shows to subscription businesses, VOD networks, all that type of stuff.
And we provide everything that they need so that they can come in, do a great show. And we help them grow it through all the different platforms and most importantly monetize it across platforms. We have a sales team, but we also have a growth and marketing team that helps them to maximize their presence across all these different platforms.
And the person who wants to start YouTube slash podcast slash internet presence, you sort of provide that to me all in one box. Yeah, that's exactly right. We, you know, we get referrals all the time both from existing clients, which is awesome from agencies, you know, PR people managers, all that.
We have a conversation with the people about what we think their potential is in the space. What do they think their potential is in the space? What do they want to do? Why are what's motivating them to go kind of independent or creator driven. And we see if there's a fit for us to play a role, our bigger small that maybe.
So you don't work exclusively with people on the right side of the political spectrum work with a lot of Tucker Carlson, I can Kelly, Barry Wises, digital presence, other folks people would have heard of for sure. We didn't set out to be exclusively in that space, but two things happened along the way. One is I ran Glenn Beck's business for 12 years. So naturally there were existing relationships in that space.
And secondly, there's a little bit of a network effect where once we've got someone that's doing great in that space, it's a little bit easier for us to plug into an existing infrastructure sales team marketing team, all those other things that know what they're doing in that. So you're working with Megan Kelly. Tucker Carlson says I need a new home, my left fox. I was pushed out of Fox. Can you help me set something up?
I mean, I think we should wear that easy. And in most cases, it's me going, you know, after the people that I really want. And, you know, sometimes we're getting aggressive about how do we go and, you know, meet those people. But generally speaking, where we're at right now, we're pretty selective and we're really going after, you know, top to your clients.
So I want to ask you how the business is going. But let's pull out broader than that because we talked a few weeks ago for a story I wrote for Business Insider about what is the podcast election or a YouTube election. You gave me a great quote, which is like, it's both. Did you see this coming a year ago, two years ago, beyond that, that podcast slash YouTube would be an important vector in the 2024 election.
I wish I could say that I saw all this coming. But really when we started Red Sea Ventures, the eight, which is 10 years ago now, we're coming up almost on a 10 year anniversary in January. And what we hoped to do was to do for a bunch of other personalities, what we did for Glenn Beck in helping to build a media company. But I don't think we had the foresight to say that this is all going to be going, you know, quite so prolifically in this direction.
So, you know, now it's easy for us to see creator economy podcasts, all these different ways that we're able to make money. And there are now more, there's more shorthand ways to talk about it. People know what a podcast. People know what a podcast is or YouTube, you know, it's all very mainstream now. In the beginning, it was a little bit more of a sell to get people to think about going independent or going out on their own.
But specific to the election, we knew that we had big hosts. We knew that we had big shows that we're going to create an impact. But I don't think anyone knew, you know, quite how big the story would be and obviously Rogan plays a huge role in that.
Yeah, and why, and I mean, a lot of people have written about it, but you're in it. I mean, why do you think there's sort of a shorthand, oh, the Trump campaign went there because that's where young men were, which I'm sure is true to an extent, but I'm sure there's more to it. Why do you think that that pod can and Trump did lots of TV too? And he's a TV guy and you can look at his cabinet, right? He consumes a lot of Fox News still.
But why do you think he and his team were interested in podcast as a campaign tool? Yeah, I think there's two reasons that make the most sense for why this all happened, you know, seemingly quickly, even though it was building over the course of years and years.
One is the audiences have moved there. It's clear that there's such a big audience for clearly Joe Rogan, but also Megan Kelly, Tucker Carlson, you know, the Apple top podcasts came out today and Tucker Carlson was number one new podcast of the year on Apple. It was Tucker Carlson Joe Rogan true crime because true crime never goes away. And that was it's what it looked like. I mean, you just, yeah, that's the universe of podcasts.
Yeah, for sure. There's a lot of other options, but those are the ones that get that tend to get I mean, the daily New York Times has reported four million downloads a day and that was a while ago. So who knows what that number is now. The big audiences and that's where that's where ears and eyeballs are moving. But the second thing is that it allows people to have longer form conversations than a six minute Fox News clip or MSNBC clip.
Yeah, exactly. And I some some people do better in that long form environment. Some people do worse in that long form environment, but that's more the medium moment we're in is deeper longer conversations. And in some ways that's going to drive the types of candidates that are successful in the next wave of elections.
And then in terms of the industry, I mean, so again, I met you when you're doing Glenn Beck and Glenn Beck at the time had had left went back in an out of Fox, but he'd gone and built his own direct to consumer business Mercury arts. Right. Did I get the date right? The blaze we called it. But yeah, we initially his overall company was called Mercury radio arts. Mercury radio arts.
And there was a lot of discussion. And I wrote about like, this is the next wave. We're going to see more people doing what he did leaving mainstream. So yeah, going to digital and building an audience there that did not happen until really the last couple years. And I have a couple theories about that. But I want to know why you think it didn't happen before and it seems to be happening now.
Two things. One is the technology and tools have caught up in a big way. So when we launched the blaze, we had to mail people roco boxes and say, hook it this up to the back of your TV. You might need something called an HDMI cable. You know, we'll send you one of those if you want one. You were literally seven people boxes. Yeah, we'd send them mail them a roco box and explain to them how they download an app and watch it.
And so clearly with every TV in the world having connectivity and every toaster in the world having connectivity, you can now that technical hurdle and user behavior hurdle is is is gone. Sixty million people watched the mic tycent and Jake Paul, whatever that was. Yeah, exactly. So that's that's the first change is an acceptance of technology acceptance and audience behavior acceptance.
The second change of the monetization side, which is where can where are the dollars and Jeff Zucker has the famous quote that he's, you know, been assigned over the years of of digital dimes for, you know, analog dollars or whatever it is.
I think we're in a position now where those those dollars are more digital than they are analog. In a lot of cases, when we think about people who are in both a linear network space and a digital space. It's easier to scale quicker to scale and potentially more lucrative in the digital space. So the eyeballs are there. The money is there. You're saying it's potentially more lucrative than a traditional big dollar TV contract.
And I think that definitely depends on the talent. We talk to folks who want to leave traditional media and, you know, we hear how much money they're making and we say, wow, that's a great deal for you. And, you know, if I model out how long it's going to take you to make that if we're successful, it might be three years before you can make that kind of money again. And that's if we're successful, we might not be.
So for a lot of people, we suggest hang on to those coattails of big fat media page, as long as you can. Yeah, and start a podcast. If networks let them in a lot of cases, you know, ESPN and others are famous for for clamping down on all rights from talent. And we always push talent to say, let's do it on the side to start. Let's start building. And then maybe you're ready in a couple of years if you can.
But for the most part, we think that it's only right for certain talent at big levels. If you're trying to replace a $2 million your paycheck, it's going to take time unless you're Dr. Carlson. We'll be right back with Chris Bath, but first a word from a sponsor. Think scaling AI is hard. Think again. With Watson X, you can deploy AI across any environment. Above the clouds, helping pilots navigate flights and on lots of clouds, helping employees automate tasks on prem.
So designers can access proprietary data and on the edge. So remote bank tellers can assist customers. Watson X works anywhere so you can scale AI everywhere. Learn more at IBM.com slash Watson X IBM. Let's create. Think scaling AI is hard. Think again. With Watson X, you can deploy AI across any environment. Above the clouds, helping pilots navigate flights and on lots of clouds, helping employees automate tasks on prem.
So designers can access proprietary data and on the edge. So remote bank tellers can assist customers. Watson X works anywhere so you can scale AI everywhere. Learn more at IBM.com slash Watson X IBM. Let's create. Support for the show comes from Polestar. Innovation is at the heart of every Polestar car and their SUV, Polestar 3 is no different. From the intuitive infotainment system to its head-turning design, Polestar 3 is for drivers unwilling to compromise.
That means merging a spacious comfortable interior with the torque and handling of a sports car. Now you can go from 0 to 60 in as little as 4.8 seconds and get an EPA estimated range of up to 315 miles per charge. Polestar 3 even allows the driver to optimize the powertrain between performance and range mode depending on your drive's needs. Experience an unclutter dashboard showing you everything you want to know and nothing you don't.
The innovation doesn't stop there. Because you can just have Google turn on your favorite podcast and be immersed in 3D sound by Bowers and Wilkins. Polestar has put in the time designing and refining Polestar 3 and that means the time you spend in it will be the best time of your day. Book a test drive at Polestar.com. And we're back. I want to put Tucker and Megan to the side for a second.
The kind of talent that does well in your environment right now is this some like I always thought of people who have radio backgrounds because they're used to talking into a mic for a long time. They don't need to have other guests necessarily. They're also doing it daily probably with less support than TV. Is there a certain makeup of a person that works well in a digital environment that flip it around?
Is there someone who can do really well on TV and doesn't translate either talent wise or doesn't want to put in the effort that you need to do that? Yeah, that's that's an easier way to answer the question, which is what doesn't work? What doesn't work if someone who's there by virtue of the time period that they're on TV?
So if you're a a nightly news anchor and no offense to the nightly news anchors, you are unlikely to be successful as a podcaster because you're being paid five 10 15 million dollars. And if you were out that night and your B host goes in, the numbers probably are exactly the same. And therefore the replacement value, if you will, to use a baseball analogy is not that high for you. But can't you argue that you would I totally what you're saying I would also say if I'm, let's say, lester Holt.
Yeah, I don't know what his audience is at the moment, but you would say it's much smaller than it was a year ago or five years ago. You'd say, all right, there's still a big audience that knows who I am. Yeah, there must be a sliver of them that would follow me to a digital platform. That was sort of the logic of all of this, right?
Five 10% of your audience comes with you to digital when you left mainstream. I don't know if that's the the working thesis now, but shouldn't they're just just by the exposure you're getting on mainstream media be enough to bring a digital audience with you?
I'd say mostly not that that there's really a fandom component to it. And that's the that's the dark arts part of this that we try to figure out when each person comes to us and we try to evaluate whether they're going to be a good fit for us and for the medium is how much do they have real fans versus how much they have just viewed.
Or listeners who who would consume whatever replacement show went in there if that person were to go someplace else. So we try to evaluate that fandom and people always you know agents in particular always say is it the number of Facebook followers or you know followers on X or whatever it's not really any of those things.
It's it's watching the show it's it's watching it's listening and talking to people about how they react to this person and would you kind of proverbial really walk across broken glass because we're switching you from a push medium to a pull medium. And that means people are going to want to have to pull right they don't have to go get a Roku box anymore, but they do have to go find you they may have to pay for you in certain cases.
Do you use any kind of metrics I remember this when sub stack was going out recruiting people for their whatever they call the other advanced program was they weren't just looking at people with the most Twitter followers they were looking at engagement and replies and I'm often your stuff was quote tweeted etc. Yeah, I don't think we have gotten that savvy, but I also don't think it necessarily would be worth it for us to do that. There's no you're not pulling people's q value.
No, no, and also you know red seat ventures strategy such as we have one is that we want to work with a small number of big shows not a big number of small shows. There are a lot of networks out there, you know that are good at working with 100 200 500 1000 shows. That's not us. We're good at giving a very high level of attention to a smaller number of shows and really being partners with those shows across everything that's out there today.
And everything that's going to come in five years who the heck knows what platform is going to be I wish I knew but I don't is going to be dominant for monetization in five years, but we're going to figure that out for you. We're going to help you become a leader there and we're going to help you grow and monetize an audience on that whatever platform may be.
Megan Kelly was a fox star went to NBC that didn't work out she was making an enormous amount of money and she's kind of rebuilding herself. Tucker Carlson was pushed out of fox probably near the height of his powers. Did you have any concern that like what he was doing wouldn't translate to digital. I think there was a lot of people a lot of people said you know what he's a big deal. He's very important, but whoever they put in the same time slots going to replace him.
Same replacement value idea you had and he can go to X or you too, but he's not going to be meaningfully important. Definitely not. I felt very strongly that Tucker was going to have the number one podcast in the country or number two depending on how quickly Joe Rogan grows. Why compared to any other person who's on TV with the big audience. Yeah, I think the answer for him is his ability to be at the front of the creation of media moments rather than cover media moments.
This is one of the things we talk about a lot in news and especially in right of center news that there's a lot of podcasts, YouTube's TV shows in particular radio shows that news happens. They react to it. It's interesting because they're interesting people, but that's sort of the end of it. There are a few personalities who have the ability to create news cycles rather than react to news cycles.
And you know, I would point to Glenn Beck as a big one of those back when he was in the Fox News days in particular, but also on the blaze. And I would point to Tucker Carlson, absolutely, and say this is a person who's who was must watch not just for the right, but sort of for everyone to try to figure out what the heck everyone else is going to be talking about. And intriguing and flammatory both he's going to go making.
He's going to put in. Yeah, he is, but some people really want to watch it. Yeah, and I think that the idea that he can create the news and those are the people who and Megan is doing that increasingly right now, the coverage that Megan is getting across the entire internet for every single thing that she says or does right now is really astounding.
I haven't seen anything like it since, you know, the Glenn Beck Fox News days where there's a newsworthy piece of content that comes out of every one of her podcast these days. And I also think that that goes toward this shift that we've been talking about where for a long time, whatever happened on podcasts happened between the years of the people listening and it didn't make it successfully out into the rest of the world.
And now the top podcasts are making news more often not because the shows have gotten better, but because people are paying more attention and we'll have some great content is happening there. I assume frankly, the fact that most of these podcasts are also video shows for sure makes it that much easier for to travel if you're doing a TV news segment.
You now have a couple seconds that you can fill with your clip to link to from a website. It's so hard to link to audio podcasts, which is stupid that it's hard, but it's hard. Whereas linking to an exact second inside of YouTube. It's also a picture you don't have to it's not just a quote. Yeah, that's more compelling. Yeah.
How is the money working? There used to be a stigma about advertising on sort of right wing conservative spaces in general and podcast, the same problem podcast in general, right? For different reasons, it seems from my outside perspective, you're still struggling with that. You're not you're not getting blue ship advertisers on Tucker Carlson show is that could have first of what perception correct.
I think it's correct that it's rare that we see any, you know, fortune 500 companies spending a lot of dollars in any controversial space news true crime. You know, brightest center politics left a center politics in the podcast space generally speaking brand safety and put on doing air quotes right now for everyone listening brand safety is still something that people that that big brands are concerned about worried about obsessed with in certain cases.
And therefore they avoid all politics in all news and all true crime and all other people things that people like to listen to. Do you think that changes simply because people more familiar with this stuff because it's more popular because politically we're in a climate now where stuff that people maybe would have wanted to shy away from a year ago.
They're willing to accept now. I think the audience is there already think you're always going to be sort of fighting in uphill battle. I'd say I hope it changes. I hope that advertisers realize that a small number of ex users who are not listeners of the program that they're going after are attempting to weaponize the fellow fans to go after you and say you will never buy that forward if you advertise.
Well guess what then we're going to buy that for it anyway. You know don't listen to them. So I hope it changes normally I am not optimistic about that change because of the overall resistance of brands to to to take risks.
I will say that one thing that is making me slightly more optimistic is not so much the cultural change or the acceptance of Trump at UFC or football games or any of those types of things. I do think people should be paying attention to those things in the fact that he won the popular vote. But I don't think that's what's going to drive it. I think what has a little bit of a chance of driving it is Elon Musk and what he's done at X to be a warrior for free speech but at the same time.
Hopefully at some point try to build a platform that's really successful for advertisers. Yeah I mean he's done his best to make it a terrible place for advertisers right. He's literally told him to go fuck themselves. Yeah he did say that.
And the rational move for anyone who bought an advertising based business and didn't want ads to go away and knew that if he tweeted was to stop knew his tweets were upsetting advertisers would be to shut up or tweet less and he showed no interest in doing that. So since he seems to be the same person he was for the last couple of years. How do you think that is going to shift the ad market.
The key metric for advertisers is the effect in this other advertising. So for the moment it's not the most attractive place for advertisers because it's not working for advertisers in the same way that Facebook and Google and meta have fed it meta Facebook again but overall meta Instagram all those other places.
They have enormous scale but also it works if I place an ad for my amazing cooler that keeps your soda cold for 300 hours and I can really dial in on my creative and I can really dial in on my ad targeting. I'm going to sell a ton of cool because they have enormous scale and data about how to reach you and you also mentioned someone selling a cooler they're not selling a forward right.
You're not doing brand ads through YouTube and Facebook generally some of them but it's still more direct response. Twitter for its pre-ealon history was the opposite. They didn't have scale. They didn't have that much data. They didn't have scale though. You're talking about what 100 million daily activities or something. They did not compare to a YouTube or a right.
You can talk people who used to sell the ads there. They said what we told our buyers eventually was this is how you can reach basically sort of like blue state blue city. It wasn't so much that it was blue or liberal but like you can reach coastal. People and that's where maybe you do want your brand stuff from front of them. Yeah. Seems like Elon's engineer something where he's got the worst of both worlds. He doesn't have those that we it's and he doesn't have the scale.
But again I don't think that scale is necessarily the issue. There are there are websites in the world that have a million monthly active users that are able to convert advertisers. The issue is the effectiveness of the advertising which goes to ad targeting ad skip ability at you know the frequency caps all the things that Facebook and YouTube have mastered that look easy from the outside that look oh my gosh there's a 15 second ad for this product.
And how hard is that to create well it's really hard and I think that eventually Elon is likely to crack that and I really hope he does because we're looking very carefully for another place to monetize video in anywhere the same world as YouTube which has become huge for us for across our clients. And right now there isn't that platform. Right he's one of his things when he's bottom of this will be a YouTube and I'll bring creators over and I'll give them a better deal.
Yeah that's one of the many things he said and sort of has dropped or it's harder than he imagined. Yeah. But you think that it's still plausible that he could make that into a if not a YouTube a YouTube like place for you. I think so I hope so I think you know he's going to be pretty busy you know but somehow he's managed to run six companies and do everything else. What's what's cutting the government while we're at it we're right back with Chris back but first a word for the sponsor.
Support for the show comes from pole star innovation is at the heart of every pole star car and their SUV pole star three is no different from the intuitive infotainment system to its head turning design pole star three is for drivers unwilling to compromise. That means merging a spacious comfortable interior with the torque and handling of a sports car. Now you can go from zero to 60 in as little as 4.8 seconds and get an EPA estimated range of up to 350 miles per charge.
pole star three even allows the driver to optimize the powertrain between performance and range mode depending on your drive's needs. Experience an unclutter dashboard showing you everything you want to know and nothing you don't. The innovation doesn't stop there because you can just have Google turn on your favorite podcast and be immersed in 3D sound by Bowers and Wilkins.
pole star has put in the time designing and refining pole star three and that means the time you spend in it will be the best time of your day. Book a test drive at pole star dot com. Support for this podcast comes from stripe payment management software isn't something your customers think about that often. They see your product they want to buy it and then they buy it that's about as complex as it gets.
But under the hood of that process there are a lot of really complicated things happening that have to go right in order for that sale to go through. Stripe handles the complexity of financial infrastructure offering a seamless experience for business owners and their customers. For example, stripe can make sure that your customers see their currency and preferred payment method when they shop. So checking out never feels like a chore.
Stripe is a payment and billing platform supporting millions of businesses around the world including companies like Uber, BMW and DoorDash. Stripe has helped countless startups and established companies alike reach their growth targets make progress on their missions and reach more customers globally.
The platform offers a suite of specialized features and tools to power businesses of all sizes like stripe billing which makes it easy to handle subscription based charges, invoicing and all recurring revenue management needs. Learn how stripe helps companies of all sizes make progress at stripe.com that's stripe.com to learn more. Stripe make progress. Support for this episode comes from AT&T. What does it feel like to get the new iPhone 16 Pro with AT&T next up anytime?
It's like when you first pick up those tongs and you're now the one running the grill. It's indescribable, like something you've never felt before, all the mouth-watering anticipation of new possibilities, whether that's making a perfect cheeseburger or treating your family to a grilled baked potato which you know will forever change the way they look at potatoes. With AT&T next up anytime, you can feel this way again and again.
Learn how to get the new iPhone 16 Pro with Apple Intelligence on AT&T and the latest iPhone every year with AT&T next up anytime. AT&T, connecting changes everything. Apple Intelligence coming fall 2024 with Siri and device language set to US English. Some features and languages will be coming over the next year. Zero dollar offer may not be available on future iPhones. Next up anytime feature may be discontinued at any time. Subject to change.
Additional fees, terms and restrictions apply. See ATT.com slash iPhone for details. And we're back. Let's table you on for a second. Coming back to me I mentioned earlier the idea that this is podcast but it's also YouTube. How do those work differently as businesses for you and your clients? Yeah, they do work pretty differently. We sell direct response advertising.
And just to be clear, I think anyone listening to the show gets it. But right, you know, the majority of the shows you're working on are filmed, videotaped, whatever you've whatever the right term is now. Super rate, super rate, film strip. Their video shows that you can listen to as an audio feed on a podcast and you can consume most of it on YouTube. In fact, YouTube is now the most popular podcast consumption platform recording that.
So you're making stuff once and distributing at multiple places. For sure. That's the idea and to maximize the reach and the monetization across both of those platforms and ultimately hopefully more than just two platforms or three or whatever there may be. It works differently in that on YouTube, Google sells the majority of the advertising that's not being sold by us on behalf of host read, you know, for hostreads.
Whereas in podcasts, we have a choice of what providers we can plug in to allow us to sell that programmatic inventory. So we work with Spotify and span in some cases. We work with serious XM in some cases. I heard in some cases and that allows us to see everybody and see who's really killing it and you know who is not. Because these are podcast networks. There's advertising networks that that can sell as regardless of whether you look where you listen to the podcast.
Correct. Exactly. So the monetization works differently in its our job and one of the reasons our clients pay us to absolutely optimize that across all these different platforms. What's most valuable to you right now? A podcast listener or a YouTube viewer? So a podcast listener is if they subscribe to the podcast feed on Spotify or Apple is the most valuable because they're the stickiest. They spend the most time with a given show. There's automatic downloads in both the case of those two apps.
And once they follow or subscribe or whatever the current parliances, they're going to get every episode. They're more likely to stick with us. They have more lifetime. They haven't pulled out a credit card, but it's almost as if they have they've committed to you in some way for sure. And then they start making a mental appointment in their own brain about how often is this show coming out when am I going to make the time in my commuter in my daily life to listen to this show.
So there's really more of a commitment to a podcast. Listen, whereas on YouTube it's still super valuable to us. But the people who are coming and watching on YouTube 70% of those people are not subscribers to our channel. They're being recommended algorithmically. And the two concerns that I have about that one is clearly they're not a big enough fan to have click the subscribe button so they may not be as responsive to advertising or they may watch one video and not the next.
That's one and two is we've all gone through algorithmic hell in the past with Facebook and every other platform. The algorithm that brought you there is an algorithm that could not bring them there tomorrow for sure. And so even though podcasts it's not exactly we get no data when someone subscribes to our podcast feed.
They're at least connected to that RSS feed and are likely to continue to get episodes until something like the spotifying happens where everybody kind of changes their mind again. But the podcast listener has greater long term value. Yes. Right now. Yes. Just in terms of like if we just stack them up today you have a million podcast listeners and a million YouTube viewers who's going to generate more money for you today.
The podcast listeners are going to generate more money because of that everything we've talked about that consistency of listening the listening time the loyalty to the podcast. And you can charge more for that. We can charge advertisers understand that or. Yes. It's more effective for advertisers. Advertisers understand it.
Now YouTube is coming up fast both on the dollars that we're seeing from AdSense and programmatic and the demand from advertisers for host right ads in YouTube which I think a few years ago was a little bit like what is this how do I buy it. And I think some of the agencies in particular would say well we represent that client for audio but not video. So that's a different pocket of money or it's a different person of the client or it's a different agency.
Now there's a sense that this is all the same thing and so we should be spending on Megan Kelly across audio and video and therefore we got to figure out how to convince our client to give us both pockets. Is Tucker on YouTube I should know this. Yes. So you know a couple of years ago I would have thought that Tucker Carlson would not be on YouTube that he would have either unintentionally or maybe intentionally done something to provoke them.
And maybe would make kicked off of you be demonetized in some way. What's your sense of the YouTube stance towards your clients and just people who they might have not wanted to work with in 2018. Has that changed? I'm not sure how much it's changed. I mean I listen to your podcast with with Neil my own the CEO of YouTube. And you know he was pretty careful about his answer.
Yeah on those questions. I'm not so sure that if we had COVID 2.0 they wouldn't do exactly the same stuff they did during COVID 1.0. They're pretty reactionary to government interference and they want to keep a very brand safe you know business and that's paid off for them to the $250 billion in the last 12 months.
So I get that I do think that again he'll careful he's not saying this out loud I do think there's a recognition that driving Megan Kelly and Tucker Carlson off their platform is not good for YouTube. And that we should at least be respectful of thinking about whether or not these people are saying something that I just don't like or whether they're saying something that really violates a policy or or something like that.
So maybe if I could give them credit it's that maybe they're giving us a second look when Tucker was on Fox and when Twitter was not owned by Elon Musk. Tucker also would would take great delight in trying to provoke Twitter people trying to get kicked off. He said I'm going to I'm going to dead name someone because that's a ridiculous policy and no one knows what it means. And here I go. Doesn't seem like he's spending time trying to to walk that edge now. Doesn't seem interesting to him now.
I'm not sure I wouldn't be so surprised if I didn't wake up and see you know something like that tomorrow. Tucker's his own person. Tucker feels like he's in the right to create his own media company to not be told what to do. He's also created a massive subscription business. So he's going to be plenty successful and I would say that kicking Tucker off YouTube will work as well as kicking Trump off Facebook worked.
So we've I was talking for half an hour. We've talked about Facebook and YouTube and Twitter and X and regular TV. We've not mentioned GAB, Parler, Rumble, Truth Social. All of the would be right leaning slash conservative versions of these platforms. I don't hear much conversation about them when I'm not talking to you either. What's what's the state of those networks?
The most successful is Rumble. Rumble is reaching some amount of scale both from those people who have been intentionally or otherwise kicked off of YouTube. Yeah. Right. Right wing and gaming and there's some other things that they specialize in. But yeah, right wing YouTube. What JD Vance is most successful investment. And yeah, as a VC.
So I think that there is a there there interestingly for them the fact that YouTube has given a little bit of a second look to talent and that Elon has bought X actually may hurt their their opportunity in a long term. There's no point being alternative. The thing that you want is already somewhere else.
Yeah, but I will say this may be the reason that some of these things is happening is that there are viable third party opportunities that keep these the more mainstream companies a little more straight. We we owe thanks to those platforms that are that are keeping honest these platforms. Do you think there is like a real place for networks that are specifically ideological right or left and you say everyone over here is on this side of the spectrum. And that's what you can find.
Those things exist on television right. That seems like they really have not taken off digitally is there something different going on there. Yeah, I think what's going on that's different is the value of that a network please for creators in this new world.
When I think about a network in linear it's a function of the format right there needs to be some number of hours of TV strong together for 24 hours to you know put it on coaxial cable and to put it in people's homes or put it in broadcast TV. Clearly just in the same way that iTunes change the music business and it moved to single the now spotify as moved to subscription businesses.
YouTube has changed the video industry television and soon movies I think to to be more atomized to be you're going for a piece of content versus an overall network and I build my own network. I choose to watch Megan Kelly and then I choose to watch a cooking show and those two things wouldn't be on a linear network together.
So Peter Kafka. Absolutely. I hope you do. So I think that the role of a network is changing to be the way the company that does it best is barstable sports who is a network only in name in that they're sitting behind these different shows. They're helping those shows supporting them from a monetization perspective from a production perspective and from a growth in marketing perspective but there's no 24 seven linear network in a way that's really what Red Sea Ventures is.
That's not exactly what I was getting out of getting out. Does there need to be a because if I said you're a right wing podcast and YouTube facilitator. No, it's not exactly what we do. We do a bunch of different things. But if I go to parlor or get I know what I'm going to get I go listen to pods of America. I know what I'm going to get. It's pretty consistent. But you're talking about you're you're finding your growth in sort of non ideological massive scale places.
Yeah, I think so. I'm trying to understand. I think you're going to put a platform in a media brand. Well, I'm I'm I'm really getting at is maybe that the idea of an ideological network makes more sense sort of in old media where things are constrained for various reasons and maybe online you just don't need that.
Think for the most part that's that's true that people can choose what content to watch for themselves. It's it's a pull medium instead of a push medium and therefore there is no one can ever predict the what the human brain will do next. And the idea that you might watch you know Megan Kelly and then listen to Peter Kafka. We wouldn't necessarily program it that way.
Talk to before the election. I said, you know, how do you how do you think your business is going to go depending on who wins because generally the consensus is the Republican candidate wins. That's less good for the Fox News is the world because they like sort of being out of power. The more things were going to be angry about the same thing on the left.
And you said, yeah, that sounds about right. But you also said, well, I am worried that the potential Harris administration would come after my clients or people in my world. I'm in a world where Elon Musk, Mark Andreessen, the incoming FCC chair are talking about, you know, using different language, but they're all talking the same thing, which is sort of punishing enemies going after a censorship cartel.
Does that give you any pause just as someone who makes money in media and presumably cares about free speech. Yeah, we'll have to see what what happens. I'm a free speech maximalist, you know, I believe that people should say whatever they want to say and that we should all evaluate them for what they say, which is to say that if they say something dumb, I'm glad we heard it and we can decide that they're dumb.
I don't support censorship in against the right and I don't support against the left. I'm not so sure that that's what we're going to see. But maybe we will and maybe I'll be wrong and I've been wrong a lot in the past. So I hope that they don't go down that road and that instead it's about being misinformation in the eye of the holder.
And if they're at least reducing the crackdowns on misinformation, that's a good thing or the crackdowns on what they view as misinformation, especially when they're wrong, that's a good thing. But I definitely would not be supportive of them going after people they don't like of course. I'm also not supportive of that. That's good. Curious cultural question for you. We're interviewing you in New York, you live in Connecticut, you are in the city actually.
Sorry, you're from Connecticut. So you're in the blue state bubble. Do you sense a change over the last two weeks just in the way people are interacting with people who know what you do for a living or are they interacting with you differently.
So my view on this is that the cycle of change post election is extremely short. If we remember post 2016, there was the absolute media may a copa, wow, we missed it. We didn't pay attention to the Trump people. We didn't, you know, we didn't pay attention to the flyover states.
And we're going to hire a Trump reporter, we're going to hire red state reporters and what ended up happening was exactly the opposite. They went way harder against him. The resistance formed CNN became MSNBC light. All those things happened. That's going to happen again. There will be a very short memory that he won the popular vote. There will be a very short memory that that actually right of center views are just mainstream views that the majority of people have and not this evil thing.
And everyone will go back to their corners by January 31st. And prior to this did did people give you did people, you know, I don't know if you're a cocktail party, a habitual way, but I mean, when you're in a, you know, you're walking around Manhattan, you're talking to someone and they ask you what you do and eventually they find out that you help Tucker Carlson make money. Yeah.
What's, I mean, there's a range of reactions, but is there sort of a standard one you're used to getting at this point? Well, I'm smart enough after doing this for 20 years to maybe not start with. By the way, I work in that space. But I'm also proud of it. I'm proud of the business that we've created.
I'm primarily a business person and Red Sea Ventures is not a right of center company. We run a true crime crime convention called crime con we work in a lot of other spaces like Nancy Grace's business. So and we're expanding beyond politics overall. So that's the weasel version of the answer. The real version of the answer is, yeah, sometimes people are like, you know, that's or it's probably the parties I'm not getting invited to right that are the people who really hate me.
But I do think that at a pretty high level, the executives, the money people, all those people are generally pretty tolerant of right that this is a business and, you know, that right of center content. It's a sales.
For a long time in digital, there was a sort of hope or aspiration or people like me would think about this way that you start off on my space. So the next thing you're going to do is get into television or get into movies and there are a bunch of people who have tried that. There's some exceptions.
But mostly that door is not swung that way. You're working with people who are going the other way. Do you think that's going to continue for a while that you're going to be taking people who were prominent in conventional media. Barry Weiss was on TV, but she's the New York Times and our finding new spaces online.
Or do you think at some point it evens out and you're working with sort of native online people as well. Yeah, I think we're going to be working with a lot of native digital creators. One of the things before before we were sort of all in with YouTube, which we are now and all in on podcasting.
We were all in with Facebook. And we I had a little bit of blinders about YouTube. We were really big Facebook, web traffic, you know, sell the programmatic ads and the direct sold ads and make money that way. And we did do that for several years.
And I remember going LA one time and driving around on sunset and YouTube had a campaign going a billboard campaign going and it would be this creator that you've absolutely never heard of that has like 32 million followers. And you're like and then there's like you go to the next block and there's three more.
And the YouTube averse as you and I have talked about is so vast that we're really we're focused in this space because that's where my relationships are. That's where my network is and those are the people who keep coming to me and I love that. But absolutely there's a big universe of YouTube creators who could benefit from what we do. And we are absolutely going to go after working with more of those people.
Chris Bell, if I've known you forever, this is the first time I've done this on on a podcast. Thank you for coming by. I appreciate it. Yeah, thanks for having me. I appreciate it. And I'm not one to do this very often. So you had to twist my arm, but God, we did it. That's not much. Thanks again. Thanks again to Chris Baff years and years and years. And finally got to do a podcast was good. Thanks to Lonnie Carter.
It's producing and editing this show. Thanks to our advertisers who bring it to you for free. And thanks to you guys for listening. I can't say this enough. Thanks for telling other people about it. It's great when you text me a email and when you're telling me in person you like it. It's even better if you tell someone else. Okay, thank you again. See you next week.
Support for this podcast comes from Stripe. Stripe is a payments and billing platform supporting millions of businesses around the world, including companies like Uber, BMW, and DoorDash. Stripe has helped countless startups and established companies alike reach their growth targets, make progress on their missions and reach more customers globally.
The platform offers a suite of specialized features and tools to fast track growth, like Stripe billing, which makes it easy to handle subscription based charges, invoicing, and all recurring revenue management needs. You can learn how Stripe helps companies of all sizes make progress at Stripe.com, that's Stripe.com to learn more. Stripe, make progress.
The number one selling product of its kind with over 20 years of research and innovation. Votux Cosmetic, out of botulinum toxin A, is a prescription medicine used to temporarily make moderate to severe frown lines, cross feet, and forehead lines, look better in adults.
Effects of Botox Cosmetic may spread hours to weeks after injection causing serious symptoms. Alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muzzle weakness may be a sign of a life-threatening condition. Patients with these conditions before injection are at highest risk.
Don't receive Botox Cosmetic if you have a skin infection. Side effects may include allergic reactions, injection site pain, headache, eyebrow and eyelid drooping and eyelid swelling. Alert your allergic reactions can include rash, welts, asthma symptoms, and dizziness. Tell your doctor about medical history. Muscular nerve conditions including ALS or Lugeric's disease, myasthenia-gravis, or Lambert-Eden syndrome and medications, including botulinum toxins.
As these may increase the risk of serious side effects. For full safety information, visit botoxcasmetic.com or call 877-3510-300. See for yourself at BotoxCasmetic.com.