Judge Napolitano - Gitmo Continues to Haunt - podcast episode cover

Judge Napolitano - Gitmo Continues to Haunt

Nov 13, 202411 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

The podcaster did not provide a description for this episode.

Transcript

Speaker 1

Bopper personalized care plans and new treatments through innovative clinical trials called five one three five eighty five u SECCE. Southbound seventy one continues to be a slow go out eleven and down to what's left of the truck fire at King's Mills. Right lane is blocked off. Now an accident on southbound seventy one below Fifer is on the left hand side. It adds to what was already running

slowed down to Red Bank. There's an accident in southbound on seventy five at one twenty nine, coming up next to guests who is ready to celebrate World Kindness Days. So if everyone could just take one single moment and go ahead and hug your radio, I'm sure the judge will feel the love. Doesn't that feel better? Chucking ramon fifty five krs DE talk station.

Speaker 2

A twenty eight fifty five kr see DE talk station or hug your your your smart device where you have your iHeartMedia radio software streaming judge in Apaul, who of course that's you. Chuck Ingram was referring to welcome back here on It's a real pleasure to have you on today, and I got to give you credit, sir, probably the main reason I got out of bed this morning to come to work. I've been dealing with this just insanity

of a cough. But between you and my doctor and my love and my faithful listeners, I'm holding up my extra strength. Coughs are up here, your honor.

Speaker 3

Without this, it's wonderful to hear your voice, Brian, and deeply moving that I should play even a tiny role in your deciding to get out of bed in the morning. I too, love these segments on Wednesday mornings, no matter what's going on in the world, because we are so simpotico in our view of the world. But thank you for coming in today. You actually sound fine from my perspective. I know you have a lot of whatever they put in cough medicine these days in you, but you sound fine.

Speaker 2

It is My doctor even told me that, pardon me, sometimes the pharmacist won't even fill this prescription. It's the good stuff. So I had it last night at eight pm, at last twelve hours, and it's really just now wearing off, and I'm not going to have any before I drive home this morning, because I probably get it pulled over from being compaired with it, but it does work.

Speaker 3

But the Chief Justice of the United States, William Rehnquist, was pulled over in charged with DWI because he had been taking painkillers for a slip disc in his back. Obviously, they dismissed the case because it wasn't DWI, but he was driving erratically. Yeah, well those things can happen.

Speaker 2

No, it's only a ten minute commute for me to get back home. Anyhow, you're honor, So I guess I wanted to ask you before we get into your wonderful art. It's always wonderful. Your column comes out of Midnight Tonight subject matter Gitmo continues to haunt. This is one an area that you and I have talked about many times and you've written on many times. Is extreme important. But before we get to that, I just wanted to get your reaction, and I you know Donald Trump, know Donald Trump,

obviously he's president elect. Donald Trump really just pulled one out of the hat. He won the popular vote, which is amazing. Uh, and he's gonna he's already starting to act somewhat presidential, hitting the ground running, starting to declare people that's going to be in his cabinet and everything, but the Department of government efficiency. I am actually quite

excited about this. I don't know what your feelings are about Elon Musk or VvE Grammar Swammy, but the idea that those two guys are going to be in charge of trying to cut out waste in government, that they're actually going to take a stab at doing that, I think that's room for optimism because I if I had to guess, I'd say you would agree the size and scope of government has got a little bit out of hand.

Speaker 3

Well, the problem is that nobody pays attention to the Constitution. I mean ninety percent, literally ninety ninety zero percent of the federal government is not authorized by the Constitution. In fact, this department is not authorized by statute. So they can't just the President can't just create a department out of thin air and appoint people to it and give them off of space and give them computers and pay their salaries.

That has to be authorized by Congress. Every time this has happened in the past, it's only been a window dressing. Neither mister Musk nor mister Ramaswami understand the federal government. I don't know if they understand the Constitution. So I'm not optimistic about it. I'm actually kind of down in the dumps about really the president because of some of his appointments. Listen, I know Pete hegseeth as well as I know you, maybe better worked with him daily for

a number of years. Pete is a committed zone Inista and a committed Neocon who advised Joe Biden to baumb Tehran three years ago. Donald Trump does not need an enabler in the Defense Department. He needs a wise person, like say Colonel Douglas McGregor, to point out to him the likely and probable consequences of his impulses toward bombing. Pete will not do that. Pete will reinforce those impulses because he shares them himself. I like Pete, I know him.

He's a wonderful guy, but I am very disappointed in the appointment. Donald Trump is going neocon even. I mean, these are Republican neocons as opposed to the Democratic neocons that are in there now. So look at my column from last week. Why do we vote? It doesn't matter. The military, industrial, banking, pharmaceutical, surveillance, welfare, warfare state complex will still rule the roost no matter what kind of

bluster comes out of the Oval office. Well, so I apologize for a little bit of a downer, and maybe this is not what you want to do a talk about, but this is what's on my mind right now. I suspect you agree with some of what I said.

Speaker 2

Some and you know, again going back to the department, I mean, call it what you will, department of government efficiency or just two guys sitting down at a table without it being called a department and making good, solid recommendations too. To your point, getting back to the constitutional reality that there is no there should be no Department of Education, get rid of it. I mean you can say that without having a department in offices formed and

all of that. You just listening to some people who are trying to go through the books and pair back what isn't it isn't right or shouldn't be in part of our federal government.

Speaker 3

I take that, well, then they should get rid of the Department of Education, the Department of Homelands. Yes, most respectfully to our friend, I don't know if he's going to go there, and I hope he doesn't because he's worth a lot more to our values. In the Congress.

Speaker 2

The Department of Agriculture, of Agriculture, the Department of Commerce.

Speaker 3

Why do we need the federal government to run agriculture or commerce? Where is that in the constitution?

Speaker 2

Yeah, I know, see that was one of my listeners brought that up. We do a thing called Honor Flight tri state here we fly veterans to see their memorials in Washington, DC. You know, gentlemen who mostly war veterans. Korea, we did World War Two and now they're doing Vietnam eras. But every time they drive by the Department of Agriculture, said, they point out how unblanking, believably huge the Department of

Agriculture buildings are. Every one of those offices is filled with employees multiple plural and why I.

Speaker 3

Mean grows a single blade of grass?

Speaker 2

Right, So can we live without one? I know, we live without a Department of Education before nineteen eighty and we all live thrived and survived and did fine. So let's get rid of it. That's the kind of thing I'm hoping that, whether or not it's an actual funded entity, it's formalized or not, that at least this next administration, love them or Hate them, takes some great efforts to pair back the fraud, waste, and abuse that exists across all four corners of government.

Speaker 3

I would add to fraud, waste, and abuse unconstitutional. That, of course, is the fulcrum here, because that is what will ruffle the feathers on Capitol Hill. They believe that whatever they do is constitutional, even though the overwhelming majority of it is not, because it's not authorized by the Constitution. So they take the commerce clause and hang their hats on the hook of whatever affects interstate commerce. And they take the necessary and proper clause and hang their hats

on those hooks. And they think they can right any wrong, and regulate any behavior, and spend any money, and intrude on any relationship. The Constitution be damned.

Speaker 2

Well, let me dream for a moment, and please share in my dream. Judging of Politano, I'm pretty reasonably happy with Donald Trump's Supreme Court choices. Of course, we've made great strides into pairing back the administration state administrative state with the Chevron doctor, and and of course West Virginia versus EPA. We could go on. With Trump as president

and him having control of the House at Senate. We might get a few more extra judges a couple anyway, could we maybe in our lifetime judge to Politano see Wickered versus Philburn rolled back.

Speaker 4

Wow, that's the great Ohio case that allows the government to regulate even trivial, even immeasurable activity on the theory that if you add up all the immeasurables, they can be measured.

Speaker 3

Justice Scalia's and I'm gonna have to go on a minute, Brian. One of Justice Scalia's life was to get that roll back, and at one point he had five votes, and then, as happens, Chief Justice changed his mind.

Speaker 2

Now they got the goods on him too, perhaps, but at least I can live to dream about it. If it was a Kamala Harris administration, I could just throw that dream into the ash bin. Judge. In the interest of your time, we'll part company early today, real quick. Here who's on the program. Who's on judging Freedom?

Speaker 3

Oh? Ambassador Charles Freeman, Colonel Douglas McGregor, Phil Giraldi, Matt Blumenthal, my first team.

Speaker 2

Looking forward to it as always until next Wednesday, sir, best of hell, Thank you very much. A thirty eight to fifty five Caro see the talk station

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android