From the heart of where innovation, money and power Colli in Silicon Vallet and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with Emily Jay. I'm Emily checking San Francisco and this is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. Twitter has a big week ahead, not just earnings, but the first hearing in Twitter v. Musk is now scheduled for Tuesday
in a Delaware court. We will tell you what to expect. Plus, Amazon and Meta are getting creative to save cash with plans to cut back on office expansion in New York. Will bring you the Bloomberg exclusive. And we're chatting with bitcoin bull Anthony Popliano about the crypto downturn and his new startup designed to train workers for a new generation of crypto comy. Looking ahead, a judge set a hearing for Tuesday, granting Twitter's request to fast track its case
against Elon Musk. Twitter lawyers claim Musk wrongfully canceled his forty four billion dollar buyout and say they only need four days to prove it in Delaware court and the Court of Public Opinion. Joining me now Jasmine Emberg, principal analyst at Insider Intelligence, So look, Jasmine, Twitter has been in a state of limbo now for months. How significant is it that they got the judge to hear this
case right away. It's significant, um, but it is of course only the first hearing in what I expect will be a pretty long and drawn out court battle. Either way, though, there really is no great outcome for Twitter at this point. It is either going to end up in the hands of someone who is unhappy and uninterested in the product, or then it's going to go back to the same position it was before this whole ordeal began, which of course is a position of under performance relative to its peers,
or perhaps even weaker than it was lost April. Right Twitter earnings are coming out towards the end of next week. What are you expecting there in the middle of all of this. Yeah, I'm expecting that we will see that Twitter had a pretty turbulent quarter, and I'm not expecting
the termoil to end right now. Musk is the noisiest challenge that Twitter is dealing with at the moment, but of course it's also susceptible to many of the challenges within the digital advertising landscape, which include these macro Economic headwinds include iOS changes include shifting consumer behaviors which are impacting you know, social media platforms across the board. Twitter is a relatively small player in the social media advertising landscape.
At Insider Intelligence, we expect Twitter to rank in just one percent of worldwide digital ad revenues this year. Compare that with Facebook, which we're expecting we'll bring in around Instagram nine percent and TikTok is even double. Um what where Twitter is expected to be by the end of
this year at around two per set. So for especially for a small tier player, this was probably a very tough quarridor meantime, you've got Twitter still making product announcements in the middle of all this, trying to portray this sort of business as usual environment when all of this is completely unprecedented. I'm curious how you think of courtroom battle. You've also got the U S midterm elections coming up.
How do you think this is all going to impact engagement? Yeah, I mean Twitter has been rolling out new ada and commerce related tools in order to you know, prove to advertisers at it's business as normal, as you said, but it certainly isn't. Twitter is a platform that thrives on news and controversies. So there is a possibility that people logged in a more signed up for the platform to watch the drama unfold. But we also heard that some people may have left the platform because they didn't want
it to be controlled by Musk. I am still expecting to see perhaps some growth in monetize able daily active users at Insider Intelligence. So for the full year to we're actually expecting just very minimal growth worldwide and a decline in Twitter users. Now we UM forecast monthly users, so they're not comparable to Twitter's m d a US. So look, if you're a Twitter investor right now, what do you do? You know, that's a great question. I think we'll have to wait and see the state of
the financials next sport next week. Um well, and we'll get a better picture of what Twitter is um really dealing with at the moment. Alright, Jasmine Emberg, Insider Intelligence principal analysts. Always good to have your perspective here on the show. Jasmine, thank you. So what are Musque's chances of getting out of this deal? And how good is Twitter's case? For more on that, I want to bring in Lawrence Hammermash, Executive director of the University of Pennsylvania
Carry Law School. Uh, Larry, I'm so excited to have you so curious to hear what you think. Whose argument is better here? Looking at what you've seen so far, a very um raucous complaint from Twitter, as well as what we've heard from Elon Musk to this point. Of course, he's been very prolific on Twitter itself. Who's got a better case? Based on what I've seen so far, I'll side with Twitter, but you know that it's early in the day. I've seen from Musk's lawyers their principal contentions
about why Musk is entitled to walk away. I've now read Twitter's complaint and it's it's pretty clear that there's there's more to the story at once Twitter tells it. That suggests to me that Musk's arguments are gonna be tough. I mean, I can go into detail, but that's the overall of you I've got. How significant is the judge
fast tracking this suit? I wouldn't well, First of all, Uh, it's absolutely standard when someone asks for a trial in a couple of months for the judge to hear the that question of scheduling pretty much right away, and sometimes the same day. So Tuesday. It's kind of leisurely for something like this. The real question is what's going to
happen on Tuesday? And is the judge going to schedule a trial in September, as Twitter as asked, or is Musk gonna come in with guns blazing with a filing that says, you know you shouldn't try this case in any kind of with any kind of speed or unusual speed. Uh, this is You're never gonna make me have to go
through with a deal, so there's no rush. Uh, you know, I haven't seen we haven't seen Musk's filing in opposition to Twitter's request for speed, But it'll be in I would guess by Monday, and we'll know more than I still would think. The judge would set the case down for trial sometime in the fall, maybe even early even late summer. Right when does Musk not come in guns blazing? Well he's he's got a big arsenal, I'll tell you that. Well, so are you saying there that you think this could
be wrapped up in the fall. I mean, we just heard Jasmine Edinburgh predict this is gonna be a long and drawn out court battle. But maybe it won't be as long as we think, well, it will be drawn out and it's gonna seem long, but it's possible that could be over by the fall late fall. Certainly. Um, that's not an unusual kind of a pace for the Delaware Court of Chancery in handling disputes involving busted deals. So how likely is it that a court will force Elon Musk to do this deal? I know it is
fairly unprecedented, but there is some precedent there. There certainly is some precedent, and in fact, the chancellor who's going to be hearing the case did it herself within the last couple of years. Uh, for a much smaller and less notorious company. But but it's a remedy that has has been used forcing the other, the buyer, to go forward. But um, and I can also say that the merger agreement between Musk and Twitter is pretty strong in suggesting
that that's what the court would need to do. But uh, it's a judge, it's a chancellor. They I think they value their flexibility and discretion in deciding what remedy is appropriate. And I could see the Chancellor saying, you know, forcing must to go through this deal. Is not necessarily a good idea for the world. Uh, And people will be better off if I find some other way to enforce or apply sanctions for non compliance with the agreement. If that's what she finds, how could the court force Musk
to buy Twitter? Do you see a daily fine, for example? Do you see going after his assets, going after his tesla shares? Yeah? I mean those are that those would be the natural go tows. Uh. People have asked me in the course of the week, but what about imprisonment? And I kind of don't think in the cards, but daily finds. I suppose you could call it the usual stuff if someone is contempt or of course a long way away from that. There's got to be a judgment
and Musk would have to find an appropriate response. And if a if a court orders you to go forward with a deal, I could see even Elon Musk settling it. And if he is forced to buy it, could he then turn right around and sell it? What are the legal issues there? I think once he's a buyer and and finishes the acquisition, it's his company, I will say
to do with what he wishes. But you know, whatever governance powers he's got over the company he can use to seek new investors, sell off a significant steak, or just continue to run it as a buyer. Interesting. Now, I want to talk about who wins in any of these scenarios. We were speaking with Jason Goldman, one of the early early members of the Twitter founding team, who said, nobody wins except the lawyers. Take a listen to what
he has to say. Definitely the lawyer years. When you know the lawyers are excited when they describe a case as being unprecedented and complicated, that's definitely code for there's going to be unprecedented legal fees. So they're they're said, everyone else is a loser in this for sure. So look, Larry, no matter the outcome, is this gonna be any good for Twitter or Elon Musk in the end? Well, Jasmine Edburgh said something before that I thought was right on
the money. Um Uh, No matter what happens, the longer this drags out, the worst it is for Twitter. Uh. Elon Musk is sitting on the sidelines right now looking at Twitter, and he doesn't have to do anything at the moment except litigate. Uh. And certainly he's got the resources to pay the lawyers to do that. Uh, Twitter's the party here that's got to deal with running a business while all these fireworks are going off all around. And as I've told people from time to time this week,
that's that's not an enviable negotiating position. So, uh, you know, there there is a victory scenario I suppose for Twitter, but uh, there are a lot of things can go wrong for everybody. For sure. How much will Musk's own record be used against him? He's got a history with the SEC. He didn't disclose his initial Twitter shares the way he should have. He's had problems with other regulatory agencies over the course of just the last few months.
Will that come into play? Um? I think at best asthmic atmospherically, the the court in a case like this is going to focus like a laser on the terms of the merger agreement. If this case is going to get decided after a trial of four days or six days or whatever. Uh, it's still going to have to be pre focused. And I I would think you're not going to hear a whole lot about uh these peripheral
things what Musk has done. It's not as if the Chancellor is unaware of some of the color here, but I wouldn't expect the parties to focus on it all right, Larry hammer Mesh, University of Pennsylvania Carry Law School Executive Director, really appreciate your thoughts and insights here. Today, TikTok just named a new head of security as the app deals with increasing scrutiny from US policymakers over concerns that user data could wind up in the hands of the Chinese government.
Blue Bricks Alex Brinka is covering the story. So, Alex, who did they tap to run security? And of course we're talking about the parent company, Byte Dance of course, of course, And and they've tapped somebody from Internal UM called kim Alberella. She will run UM Global Security for Byte Dance UM and is replacing the chap Ronald Courtier
who was there before. And I want to point out something really interesting here, because we're in this moment for TikTok where they are sparring with the US government, A lot of focuses on what they are doing security wise, and in making this move and and this change this morning to bring him in as the interim um TikTok CEO and Bye Dances VP of tax said that this is part of their evolving approach to minimize concerns about security in the U S So, UM, what I'm reading
between the lines here, Emily, and what I what I'm hearing from a source who is close to the decision making behind this move is that um Clotier was a
really great keep the bad guys out guy. Uh. Now they are kind of evolving their approach to think about how to UM best set up a data management department and security department that allays some of these concerns that we've seen coming out of Congress, coming out of the SEC about what TikTok is doing with US users data and if any of that data gets into nefarious hands
through his parent company, Bye Dance. We do have a statement from the CEO show to to part of our evolving approach has been to minimize concerns about the security of user data in the US, including the creation of a new department to manage user data US user data for TikTok. Can you remind us what the company has said about how they handle user data, who can see it, and whether the Chinese government can see it or not. Yeah, and they've said a lot. Emily, just in the past
couple of weeks UM. Basically in a letter to U S senators, the company said that they're working on coordining off US users data and working with Scipius and National Security Arm of the US government to decide which protected data is geeped by the US government should actually stay in U S servers. Those service will be run of course by Oracle. So they have said, uh, we're trying
to keep stuff here. But what has raised concern is a couple of weeks ago they did admit that some US users data does get into the hands of Chinese employees who are doing work. They say that there are there are rigorous security um kind of constraints and who can see that. But so far what that information is it is things like public videos, public comments, and things needed to run the app writ large. UM. So that's kind of the split that they're talking about right now.
But it does seem like Emily, this will be an evolving landscape and evolving infrastructure for them going forward, UM with this kind of shake up and the Security Arm
with their operations. So what's next? What do we expect? Yeah, there should be um some meetings with Brendan Cars team is something we learned about this week Brendon Cars an FCC member or Republican member who has been very loud, very vocal, saying that just this week that TikTok's a security threat to our military who's using it overseas um. The company has said this week that they're meeting with
that team. They will also continue this process working with Syphius, that national security arm of US government, to try to wall off this information in a way that they feel comfortable with. I would guess what they're trying to do is head off any large buzz like we saw a couple of years ago, with folks like President Trump at the time saying we need to get rid of TikTok because it is a national security threat. Um. But I would expect that kind of volleying to continue between lawmakers,
folks like the SEC, and TikTok. All right, Bloomberg's Alex Barnka, thank you for breaking all that down. Coming up New York's prospects as a tech hub, just take a bit of a we will explain next. This is Bloomberg Now to an exclusive. Sources tell Bloomberg that Meta and Amazon are cutting back on plans to boost their office presence. In order to cut costs, both companies are backing out of expansions in New York that could have brought hundreds
of millions of dollars to the city's economy. Bloombergs Natalie Wong broke this story. Natalie, what do we know? Thanks for having me. So we reported today that Meta and Amazon have pulled back on their expansion plans for offices in New York City. Meta had planned to take over roughly three hundred thousand square feet of new offices in a building near Astor Place, and that would have been a big expansion. It's no longer doing that, according to
our sources. Amazon was also in talks to expand in a JP Morgan subly space, taking over a roughly four hundred thousand square feet, and they're also cutting back on the amount of script they're looking to take. So it really shows a sort of ca caution on these tech firms parts in terms of looking at how much office space they really need in this current market condition. So how big a blow is this to New York's ambitions
to become a bigger tech hub. It's a pretty big blow just because New York has already been struggling with a major office split. UM, and it's just slowly started to come back in terms of office leasing in the past two years. The firms that were really driving us for the big tech firms that seem to have instatiable
appetite force bace like Facebook, like Amazon. So the fact that even these firms are pressing pause on growth, you know, that's likely going to trickle out across smaller tech firms, their crypto firms, and other financial industry firms as well. Is this happening elsewhere across the country. This is happening elsewhere across the country. You know, we've reported that Amazon has cut back on other real estate needs in terms of planned warehouses for sites that they just built for
just purchased several months ago. You know, they've pressed pause on those sides. They've expanded too quickly. UM construction as halting on other sides across the country, and office markets in many places like San Francisco, Seattle, Los Angeles have already been struggling to come back because tech firms especially
have been slower to bring back their workers. So now you have a double whammy of a companies see that remote work is here to stay and they have to juggle how much space they need versus how many workers are actually gonna return, and then they also have to figure out, you know, how much costs they have to cut in terms of this slow down with their growth, with the economy and fears about it central recession. All right, Natalie Long, thank you for your reporting on this. We
will keep following. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. We've got some breaking news. Elon Musk has responded to Twitter's request to expedite the trial, which of course had judged today granted, setting a date to start for Tuesday. Musk now saying he wants that move to February or later. Of course, Twitter wants the trial to start in September, Musk saying that Twitter dragged its feet on the deal is and is now rushing this trial for a little bit more
of a breakdown. I want to bring back a leadlow and not surprising that Elon Musk wouldn't want to rush to court on Tuesday. Yeah, yeah, not surprising at all. I mean, and most of the lawyers the Bloomberg spoken to you felt that Twitter had a good case too hold Moss to account to the original terms of the deal cents a share. The hearing is set for next Tuesday, the initial hearing. The expectation is that this will be
a protracted legal proceeding anyway. But as you say, Musk is accusing Twitter of having dragged its feet over the negotiation of the deal and now rushing to court. Remember, the sticking point for him is and what he will argue is that Twitter was not forthcoming in the timing frequency or what they shared on the issue of bots on the platform. And he's going to argue that that was equal to material adverse effect, thus changing the value
of the deal, thus voiding it. Well, and we were speaking with the professor from the University of Pennsylvania Law School earlier who said, not surprising that the judge granted this request for a Tuesday hearing. What's going to happen on Tuesday will be more surprising. He suggested this trial
could be wrapped up by the fall exactly. And the thing is that, you know, it's hard to judge judge pun the pun how this will oh because there's very little past precedent in holding an offer maker an acquirer to account. But also there's not a lot of past precedent around the material adverse effects. What's fascinating, of course, is that Twitter has earnings next Friday before market, you know, while this is all going on, and earnings is happening,
so you know, hard pivot. Let's talk about what's happening in a while, because because it's just so much right to take on board that Twitter reports Fridays, they said, we start Monday or Tuesday rather with with Netflix, Tesla Snap. What these many of them have in common is that they have actually revised guidance the year right. Tester had a very difficult quarter where the Shanghai plant was shut down.
You see how tired I am. This Friday will bring up the next poor business director, and look at the following week, because we're bracing not just for next week but the week after that. Look at the number of companies reporting in the space of just a few days, the mega cap that's around them very quickly, and we make a really interesting point as we look at what the kind of expectation is for this earnings period. The expectation is sales growth, right, top line growth. Part of
that is boosted by inflation. Part of that is that the consumer is kind of held up strongly and that's kind of where we're looking. Sales growth is looking pretty good other than for the alphabet parent company of Google. But if you look at the earnings estimates, the profit that's expected, those earnings expectations have come down. Why you have inflation, you have things eating into margins, higher input costs,
labor costs. So this is it. Now we're super focused on what the world looks like, and hopefully in the next two weeks some companies and some of their CEOs are going to give us a good explanation of what it's look at those beautiful graphics. Add thank you very much, appreciate you walking through all of that for us. I want to get a little more in depth now on the earnings and what we can expect with Bambahara and principal analyst and CEO at Creative Strategies, Ben Gosh, what
are you expecting? Where are you expecting to see the most pain? Let's start there. Yeah, so I am a bit more cautious on consumer central companies. I think there's a lot of worry UM and that consumers are Companies who are a bit more adverse and UM and more consumer focused are going to bear a bit more of the pain here. I'm not quite sure how much we're gonna see in this particular cording corders earnings of absolute pain.
I think as we see where they might be guiding and seeing some cutbacks, I think some of the companies like Snapchat, Um, Facebook, Twitter, et cetera, that have advertising focused businesses and really companies that are trying to go to consumers through those channels, if we see them start to cut back, that that I get, I think will be very telling about how much pain we might expect.
But yeah, I think those that are over index or or most subject to a weakening consumer market are the ones that I'm a bit more a bit more worried about. I think on the enterprise side and the infrastructure side, we're not seeing that that business is cut back to the same degree or spending go down and infrastructure. But that consumer segment, I think is really where there's both questions, and if we do see a little bit more of a recession, I think it's going to be more on
the consumer facing side than the industry at large. Well, let's start on social media. Since you went there, you've been tweeting about the value of the interest graph, which is something that TikTok seems to do very well versus the social graph. At the same time, you've got all of this background noise happening with Twitter, and I wonder if that's, you know, continues to be a story contained in itself, or if that story can be contagious or
contaminate some of the other social media stories we're following. Yeah, I mean, the thing that's interesting about the engagement side, So consumer engagement with social media is going to continue to go up and remain strong, right whether or not brands feel like consumer appetite is there for some of
their products. If consumers have to cut back on disposable income, I'm not sure it really hits things like maybe PCs or smartphones, although I think that gets hit, but not as much as things that are more luxury type products or things that they can cut out of their life if they need that disposable income back again because of inflation or perhaps because we have issues with the job market that that I think we're still is uncertain around.
So I think the engagement stays, but again not say metric in terms of consumer engaging with these media platforms. If ad spends cut back and not affects their revenues, so the consumers will still be there. How they dispose of that income to spend on things that they either really need or want coming into this holiday season, which is really where you'll see these advertisers use those channels,
is going to be the big question. So I think, as I pointed out in the segment prior, where they guide what they start to think about the next few quarters from these CEOs I think will be very, very telling because I I don't think we'll see the full pain right now, but I think we're aching toward a bit more pain in the consumer side, and that's at least where I think more of the thesis needs to get built out. I want to ask you about chips. I recently had the CEO of IBM on Arvin Krishna.
He said he was feeling opt to stick about the economy and corporate spending, but what he feels pessimistic about is supply and chip semi issues. Too quick, listen to what you have to say. I actually maybe a bit more pessimistic on that than optimistic. I think supply chain resilience is a real fundamental issue that's going to go on for a couple of more years, we're going to see a raft of semi results. What are you expecting there? Yeah, this is something we could talk along try. This is
a deep web of of complex problems. But I think absolutely and even if you look at some of the commentary that's come out of t SNC over the last few days, noting that they feel a lot of their customers have a glut of inventory is going to cause them to cut back a little bit on on manufacturing and even in some of their investments going forward, because most of their customers are sitting on inventory that they
need to go and make and make products. So the hard part with that is it's going to look like manufacturing companies like D s MC and even the likes of you know, Intel and Qualit, common A and D might have less than stellar corders, but that's not really indicative of demand. It's more indicative of their customers cutting
back orders because they're sitting on so much inventory. So it's kind of is this really an issue or how much is this disguised on the fact that they over ordered because of that the supply chain issues, Knowing that they were going to have a hard time getting chips and so by sitting on all that inventory, we're going to need that to ease into the market before orders
can get placed up again. So there's a balancing act that I think most of the particularly the semi conductor companies, are going to have to navigate while they either try to fill orders and help their customers, then get through that the inventory that they're sitting on so that their orders can come back again, hoping that demands stays high for their products across the board. All right, well, thanks
for digging into that very deep and complex web. Ben Maharan, principal analysts and CEO at Creative Strategy, is always going to have you time out for our crypto report bitcoined up over the last few sessions, but all eyes on the bankruptcy of major crypto lender Celsius, sparking calls for more regulation, especially bankruptcy legislation, as the crypto market continues to tumble more broadly, our crypto contributor Sali Bossick here with more shale. What's the latest that we know here?
This is a problem here, Emily. At the end of the day, the question is how are consumers protected, not only in the event of a bankruptcy. But in the event of larger market stress. You've seen several instances now in which customer withdrawals were paused, and now you're seeing in the bankruptcy filing here for Celsius. Is there a clear roadmap here on what happens to customer coldings as
certain creditors want to get paid back. You're seeing this issue come up, even as Celsius has has started to pay back some DeFi counterparties in other ways. But where do the customers fall at the end of the day when you're thinking about who gets owed what when and in what order. Now, this Celsius bankruptcy just has so many knock on effects, including now that it could potentially impact bitcoin mining. Yeah, this was an interesting question too.
I've spoken about it with Sam Bankman. Freed also would he buy bitcoin miners? And part of the answer he had was to the extent that it was, you know, tied to the defy activity that we're seeing in the lending. Maybe we'll think about it, but probably not more immediately. So what's happening here? A lot of worries about the
bitcoin mining subsidiary about Celsius. If Celsius were to sell the business or sell rigs or offload rigs in anyway, does that put more downward pressure two prices across the industry. We're going to shift a little bit over now and talk about this more with Anthony Pompliano of the crypto firm POMP Investment Venture Capitalist for a while now. Pump,
thank you so much for joining us. You've shifted gears UH to kind of focus on some optimism here at a tough time for the industry, focusing on not just you know, the trouble and the pricing here, but as prices go down, jobs start to dry up. So you launched a new company here that really focuses on those jobs. And I'm curious as to how many you're actually seeing. Yeah,
thanks for having me. Um. If you think of the job market, you know, one of the biggest problems in the world right now is that the global debt to GDP and also in the US debt to GDP UH is skyrocketing. And everyone always focuses on the debt side of the equation, Hey, how can we stop taking on more debt? But there was another side of the equation,
which is how do we grow GDP faster? And obviously job creation is a key piece of that, and so our idea eighteen months ago was basically just how do we get the best people in the world working on the fastest economic UH sector from a speed and growth standpoint, and that tends to be the bitcoin and crypto industry. Now. Of course, as market prices go down, becoins drawn down since about November of last year, there are plenty of companies that are doing hiring freezes or layoffs, but there's
still tons and tons of companies that are hiring. And so just in the last eighteen months, we've helped over a thousand people get a job in the industry UH and we've been doing a lot of kind of corporate training both for crypto native firms but also non crypto
native firms as well. And I think what you're seeing is there is some short term pressure because of price, but over the long term, most people in the industry, both the entrepreneurs and the incumbent companies, they're very long term bullish and they continue to invest in the space. Eighteen months that included what was still a bowl market in crypto and now we're in a very very different environment.
So to what extent are those jobs really drying up, and are the jobs that are out there changing to enter a new environment. It's a great question. Um. If you think about that thousand people that we've helped get a job, four hundred of them or so was last year. Uh So in some way, actually we've seen it pick up. UH. And what you're seeing is there's a lot of venture capital it's being invested in the space. There's a lot of companies that our hitting kind of scaling. Uh. They
were started over the last two years. Now they've kind of found product market fit and they begin to actually higher and kind of stuff on the gas. And then the other thing you have to remember as well, UH, is that there's just so many companies that are getting started.
There's almost a kind of overwhelming of the market. And really, I think one of the most interesting parts of this story is not just the pure aggregate job creation, but also it's a brain drain from Silicon Valley and Wall Street. You know, almost on a daily basis myself for someone on our team, we'll talk to very high level uh folks at large corporations, at large financial organizations. UH, and they say, look, you know, now is the time they've
been thinking about it for a while. They're ready to make the jump and they want help navigating finding a job somewhere in the bitcoin and crypto industry. And so I don't think that necessarily job creation slowing down. I think it's just kind of shifting between different types of companies. You know, n f T s were really really hot and Q three last year. Uh, maybe not so much now.
You just saw Open see layoff of their staff as an example, And so there are some subsectors where there's transitioning. But still the job growth is is pretty incredible and still accelerating. I'm curious about your own investors. How did you go through the process of raising money for inflection points? Why is Peter TiO interested in the future here of more jobs in crypto and is he invested anywhere else that you know of it to promote the industry. Yeah.
You know, look, the mission of our company we started eighteen months ago, and it wasn't really ever an idea of hey, let's go raise money and doingy this. We started a business, uh, and the mission is to just accelerate economic growth globally. UH. And we were profitable almost immediately out of the gate. Uh. And for eighteen months. We kind of just kept our head down and we worked, and we only really took the money because we wanted
the right investors around the table. We didn't need the money. We're still profitable today. UM. But it was an idea of how do we get people who have tons more experience And so when you look through the entire cap table, what you find is these are investors who are highly sophisticated. They've got tons of experience. They built our companies before, They've invested in plenty of others that have scaled aggressively. UH. And many of them are very big proponents of the
bitcoin and crypto industry. You mentioned Peter Teal, you know, he obviously spoke at the Bitcoin conference. He's been a bitcoin investor for a long time. There's folks like former Alegant CEO Brent Saunders. Uh. And then there's folks that are you know, large family opposites, fit down capital or you look at somebody like an x y Z fund, you know, top ten on the Forbes Midas list for seed investors. Like these are real investors who understand, Uh,
infrastructure is a key piece to investing in a new sector. UH. And while most companies focus on building software infrastructure like exchanges, while its data providers. UH. People is a very key piece to it, and we think that we can build out a niche there and really scale. I know you tend to take the positive view on things, but there's a lot of talk out there about projects that just might not make it through the crypto winter. What types
of projects are you most concerned about? Are their tokens that are worth shying away from? Uh? Yeah, pretty much all of them for the most part. Um. I think that even if you talk to people who are big proponents of the industry, they'd say the same thing. Uh. Anytime that you get innovation happening, it requires experimentation first. And so what you're seeing as a ton of experimentation, a lot of bad ideas, a lot of bad execution,
but also a lot of bad market timing. You know, if you go back to the late nineties and you look at most of those ideas, UH, they were the right ideas, they just didn't end up actually working. Uh. In that current iteration, it took about ten years or so before consumer behavior has changed. Before more people had internet that wasn't dial up, mobile phones were in their hands, their kind of familiarity, uh, their willingness to put their
credit card online. All these different things had to change, and so I think some of that is what we're seeing right now. But one thing is very clear. Over a hundred fifty million people around the world that hold bitcoin, and I think that bitcoin has crossed over from something that people look as an experiment or could possibly be valuable. And I think now what you're seeing, especially given the backdrop of the undisciplined monetary and fiscal policy, is that
bitcoin has now broken out its separated itself. It is different than most of the experimentation of other things. UH. And there's a lot of folks on Wall Street and in Silicon Valley, uh, and then across the world that say bitcoin is here to day, and I tend to agree with them. That's pomp Investment Sounder Anthony pomp Lano. Thank you so much for your time, Emily, back to you, Janali, Thank you. And The Bloomberg Crypto Summit returns Tuesday July
in New York. The summit gathers some of the biggest names in the industry to talk about the market turmoil, regulatory scrutiny, and so much more. That is all starting a m Eastern time coming up. Can this struggling startup end up taking on ribbing. We'll talk about that and the EV world next. This is Bloomberg time now for our technomics segment, and I want to take a look
at the world of mobility. There is one EV maker rising through the ranks, and it's called Canoe, and it just won an order for forty five bands from Walmart, sending its share soaring this week. Could have taken Rivan. Let's talk about all that and more with who else but are at Ludlow could it? That's an amazing chart, a hundred percent gain in seven days. I mean this really surprised us because people were writing it off. Let's speak exactly. This is for context. You know, a startup
that has struggled, you know, literally do anything. You know, it's missed its own goals, it's changed strategy a number of times, has this kind of futuristic camper van looking kind of e v but it's never really made any progress. The stock you know, was obliterated basically since it when
public virus back in. But getting a big order like this from Walmart, not just on the share reaction, but the company's outlook has completely changed, and you actually got kind of inside look at what they have going on when you were in Bentonville, which is of course from the home Walmart right quarters. So I was at UP
Summit a few weeks ago. UP Summit is a kind of annual conference from mobility nerds and vcs that is co hosted by the Walton family and Sam Walton is a Remember at Walmart and I was walking around and I was like, hold on, isn't that a canoe over there? And it was. It was a prototype and at the time, you know, I didn't really think much of it. And low and behold, a few weeks later, they have this agreement. Although there's a lot of caveats to this agreement. I
have to say, what are the caveats? So Walmart can walk away at anytime thirty days notice for no reason. That's worry if your canoe. And you know, the other thing is that canoe hasn't demonstrated it can do anything. It hasn't really built anything. It doesn't have a clear manufacturing strategy. It has various plans to do stuff, some in Bentonville, some in other states. So you know, this is a hypothetical right now, And aren't they boxing Amazon
out of buying any of these? Well, here's what's interesting, right you think about Walmart and Amazon. These are great logistics giants. Amazon already uses multiple brands for gas powered or diesel powered trucks. Walmart has made this bet, but Walmart also has agreements with GM forward, you know, and no one is making any of these any volume, right exactly? That isn't that really the biggest challenge just to actually
how are they going to make exactly? So, you know, Rivian is kind of the poster child because they have this order for one hundred thousand units from Amazon to build these kind of bug e ad vans. You just showed them on the screen. My sources tell me they've built about six hundred of them so far, maybe a thousand, and they're supposed to deliver ten thousand by the end of the year. And you know, the pace just has
been disrupted by supply chain problems, etcetera. But there's competition there, and it's it's an interesting market because we're super obsessed with the consumer e v but we forget that in the world of moving things from A to B. All these commercial giants need other stuff. They need vans and trucks and and things that you and I won't get behind the wheelock. Well, it is not a zero sum game. But as far as we'll be watching ruins at Ludlow, thank you and enjoy the weekend to all right. That
does it for this edition of Bloombrick Technology. We've got great shows coming up next week. We will be across earnings all week long. Of course, we'll be following that big hearing in court in Delaware. Twitter Versus Musk and Matthew Ball will be joining us on Monday to talk about all things metaverse and more. I'm Emily Chang in San Francisco. Have a wonderful weekend everyone. This is Bloomer
