US Energy  Secretary Chris Wright Talks Iran, Oil, Nuclear Power - podcast episode cover

US Energy Secretary Chris Wright Talks Iran, Oil, Nuclear Power

Jun 27, 20258 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

US Energy Secretary Chris Wright talks about the impact of airstrikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, oil sanctions that are still in place and the need for more nuclear power in the US. Wright spoke with Bloomberg's Jonathan Ferro, Lisa Abramowicz and Annmarie Hordern.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

Speaker 2

Joining us now to discuss the state of energy, not just domestically but worldwide. These seventeenth United States Secretary of Energy, Chris Right, Miss the Secretary, welcome back to the program Sir, looking forward to an in depth conversation with you about what you cover every single day. So, first of all, just on a run so we can deal with that. What is the current stance of the US officially on the use and import of Irunnian crude?

Speaker 1

Oh, the sanctions are still in place. No change there, I think the Trump where President Trump was referring to there as, Hey, if we make a large piece and sanctions come off, irog can flourish.

Speaker 2

If you've got a decent understanding that, mister Secretary of just how much of running and cruit is being consumed and important already as things stand, despite the sanctions.

Speaker 1

We do so a rare producer is about three and a half million barrels a day, and they've been import they've been exporting about one and a half million barrel of oil a day. And the maximum pressure campaign that President Trump did in his last term tamp that down to only one hundred or two hundred thousand barls a day, they cut off ninety percent of it. That was a possible strategy here as well, but hadn't been implemented yet.

We tried to give negotiations a chance see if we can do it without maximum pressure.

Speaker 3

So is maximum pressure still on the table or is the ministration walking away from that?

Speaker 1

Well, the goal right now, of course, is to get a peace deal, is to get peace into the Middle East and spread the focus on commerce, not conflict. So no, it's not actively being discussed right now, but the situation is still dynamic there. We want to see peace, prosperity and security as the future of the Middle East.

Speaker 3

When it comes to what's going on in Iran as well, in terms of the IAEA, the Foreign Minister said yesterday that basically they have no plans to having the Director General Raphael Grossy in Iran and doesn't sound like they're willing to give the inspectors the space, time and access they need to look at these nuclear facilities. What is the United States response to that?

Speaker 1

Yeah, look, this is early on. This is early on. Iran has just had most of its nuclear program entirely devastated by Israel and the United states. They're a little bit humbled, they're a little bit shell shocked right now. So yeah, I wouldn't put too much weight on those words. But a final peace steal certainly has to have confidence in a dismantlement of the Iranian nuclear program and that people can have security it won't be resurrected in the future.

Speaker 3

You deal with a lot of nuclear at the Energy Department before the US strikes, but after the Israeli strikes, Raphael Grossi told us that the IAEA cannot verify with the four hundred kilograms of sixty percent enrich uranium in Isfahan was currently where it was? Was it still there? Do the irradiance take it out? Doesn't the IAEA need to go in and verify where this enrich uranium is?

Speaker 1

I think that's quite likely part of a future negotiation, in our future deal.

Speaker 2

Miss the Secretary. Of course, this is just one part of the convers sanction and energy right now. I can tell you earlier on this morning, there's a report that you might have scene that came from Rouyts. Essentially, the administration is readying a package of executive actions aimed at boosting energy supplying to PAWA. The US expansion of ARNTS official energy Mister Secretary, what can you share with this this morning.

Speaker 1

Yeah, Look, artificial intelligence is an incredibly exciting development that's coming. It is going to revolutionize not just our economy but our health drug discovery, but it also plays a huge role in national defense, which is why I've compared it to the Manhattan Project. It's critical, It'll be transformative and we must lead. We cannot be second place in AI. And to do that, we have the scientists, we have the capital. You have to have a huge growth in

US electricity production. So we need to get the morass in the way that's really hobbled the American energy system for the last four years, and we got to unleash American investment in American capitalism. That's going to take building a lot of new generation.

Speaker 4

Mister Secretary, to build on that idea. What type of energy production are you looking at? I know that New York State was just looking at potentially creating a new nuclear energy plan. Is that one of the paths of travel that you think is going to be pivotal for the United States?

Speaker 1

Absolutely, look to have a secure power glid into power AI. You need ninety nine point nine percent of the time on power, and so that today our biggest source of reliable power today by far as natural gas. Our second biggest source is nuclear, and our third biggest source right behind that is coal. So those are the three keys to the future of our electricity grid. Nuclear we haven't built much for a while, so I was thrilled to

see the governor's announcement embracing nuclear in New York. We have the governors of Tennessee and Georgia and Virginia passionate about getting new nuclear built in their states. So yes, one of our goals in this administration is is to launch the American nuclear renaissance.

Speaker 4

Mister Secretary, how do you encourage this type of investment at a time where the goal of the President has also been to lower prices? And we've seen this particularly in the energy space, for the President has been very vocal about the desire to see energy prices lower, and this has led to a number of oil rigs in the Shelle patch to be taken offline because it isn't profitable for a lot of these companies to be producing as much as they used to. How do you sort of square that circle?

Speaker 1

Yes, Yeah, prices are supply and demand. Prices are supply and demand. But what we're doing in the administration is everything possible to lower the cost of produce energy in the United States. Cheaper to produce a barrel of oil or an MCF and natural gas, you know, or a ton of coal or a kilowater hour of electricity from nuclear plants. So that's deregulatory, that's common sense regulation focused on health and safety and the environment, but not the

nonsense that just burdens burdens energy producers. Nuclear will be a little bit more expensive at the start, but I think think that cost will be borne by hyperscalers. They want to see nuclear rearrives and they'll sign higher power purchase agreements to help kickstart nuclear. We need to grow the energy supply and keep costs down. You're right, that's a challenge. You're right to bring that issue up, and that's what I work on seven days a week.

Speaker 2

Let's get at the regulatory burden. We're lucky to have someone in your seat that's actually ran an energy company in this country. As you know, permitting it's really difficult across many dimensions. You have to go state by state, and the things you can do at the executive level to make this a lot easier. Could you describe those kind of things?

Speaker 1

There are a number of things, and it is why we created the National Energy Dominance Council. That's really to bring people leaders from all different agencies that impact the ability to build things in our country together and say what. We talk to producers and say, you know, why aren't you building that? And they'll give us a list of seven things. It'll take us seven years, and we're really worried about this one and that one. So we dive into those issues and say how can we simplify that?

But I'll highlight a Supreme Court decision from just a few weeks ago on to get more oil out of Utah via train that had been held up for years through suits over NEPA, and the Supreme Court ruled eight to zero. Every Supreme Court justice involved in the case said, yes, we need to put NEPA back in its box. It's

to check to make sure the environment's being considered. It's not to have years long, endless delays because if you delay something, you make it more uncertain, more expensive, and simply less things get built.

Speaker 2

Mister Secretary, I appreciate your time as always to break down the situation. Hopefully we can engage you on this conversation again. Chris Ryanthand, the Energy Secretary of the United States,

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android