IMF Director of Monetary & Capital Markets, Tobias Adrian, Talks IMF Growth - podcast episode cover

IMF Director of Monetary & Capital Markets, Tobias Adrian, Talks IMF Growth

Apr 16, 20266 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

IMF Director of Monetary & Capital Markets, Tobias Adrian, joins "Bloomberg Surveillance TV" to talk about the impact of the conflict in the Middle East on international markets, as well as the threat of private credit.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

Speaker 2

Here's the latest this morning at the IMF World Bank Spring Meetings. The IMF cunning its growth outlook and warning of major risks at the War Persists the IMF Global Financial Stability Report. Right in, the global financial system is confronting several channels through which market turmoil could escalate into financial instability. Tobias Adrian, the IMF Director of Monetary and Capital Markets, joins us now from more good morning, So it's good to see you.

Speaker 1

Good morning.

Speaker 2

I was just recalling a phrase from the Bank of International Settlements from more than a decade ago, and that was uneasy calm. And I think that phrase uneasy calm maybe captures this moment quite well. Do you agree.

Speaker 1

Well, when we look at markets, there's certainly a lot of risk appetite in markets that has come back over the past seven weeks. We've seen an ebb and flow in terms of this risk appetite. You know, our own assessment is that risks continue to be tilted to the downside.

Speaker 3

Well, this is a strange thing, right, So, risks to continue to be tilted to the downside, and markets are hitting new all time highs. People are moving on as though this doesn't exist. I mean, how do you understand that from a sort of animal spirit's point of view, and where there could be potential systemic risks that are developing.

Speaker 1

Yeah, that's a very good question. So the way that we look into the future is by considering three scenarios. A reference scenario that is relatively benign, where the inflationary shock is somewhat temporary, A network scenario where the inflation shock is more persistent and many center banks would have to act. And then a severe scenario where financial stability

problems would start to play a role. And looking back again over the past seven weeks, you can imagine that sort of like the relative likelihood of those three scenarios was shifting over time as the new news flows what's setting markets.

Speaker 3

At the same time, it seems like there are a number of economies, particularly in Asia Southeast Asia, that don't have enough money to acquire physical crud right now, and so they're having the shutdowns, they're having some of the restrictions on commercial activity. Given how tenuous the financial position was to begin with in some of these nations, how much does it set back by decades some of the countries that had made progress.

Speaker 1

Yeah, that's a very good point. Right, when we look across countries, there's a huge variance in terms of how how hard countries are hit in terms of pricing and in terms of the oil supply shock. So it's the more vulnerable countries, whether that's vulnerable emerging markets or developing economies, you know, those that disproportionately hit as the share of energy consumption and food consumption is much higher relative to

advanced economies. And of course as many countries are importers of oil, imputus of gas, and that is particularly challenging for them.

Speaker 3

You know, it's strange. It seems like, yes, there's an uneasy comm and there's a war going on that's really threatening supply chains. But the atmosphere this year at the IMF meetings is actually significantly better than it was last year.

Speaker 2

Why is that?

Speaker 1

So, as you pointed out at the beginning, there is quite a bit of a hope that is around. Though when we look back over the weeks, you know, there has been a back and forth, Right, volatility has come up at the moment the VICS is you know, below or at about historical averages. But you know, we have seen spikes as well, So you know, let's see how we evolve.

Speaker 4

To Lisa's point out what's going on in Asia, Bob McNally was just on he said, it's a famine when it comes to energy. Is that going to hurt capital flows into these countries?

Speaker 1

So we have seen a withdrawal of fourier flows out of emerging markets that is significant, right compared to twenty twenty two, it's about double in terms of outflows, but the price action remains somewhat contained. So spreads have widened, both hard currency and local currency spreads, but relative to the flows, it remains at somewhat benign scenario.

Speaker 2

Is there something about this situation that risks amplifying existing vulnerabilities? We talk often about private credit. Do you see a connection between the two things at the moment.

Speaker 1

Yeah. So there are a number of vulnerabilities that, taken in isolation, seem manageable, but if all the vulnerabilities come together, it could become uncomfortable in a severely adverse scenario.

Speaker 2

Do you think that's likely.

Speaker 1

We think there's some likelihood on this severe scenario, but it's certainly not our baseline.

Speaker 2

It's certainly not appreciated right now financial markets in general, with equity markets at all time highs at the moment on the S ANDPR that ASDAC this morning.

Speaker 3

And frankly, if you listen to the rhetoric from a lot of their banks CEOs, none of them seem to think that private credit is a real systematic threat in fact, in fact, they're all investing and broadening out. And what Ted pick said yesterday was it's a credit issue. It's not just private credit, and if the economy is going gangbusters,

just guess what credit does well. Ultimately, it seems like everyone feels better this time this year then at the same time last year, even with no oil or anything else getting through the strait of removed.

Speaker 2

There was a line of questioning in your Ted pick insview that I thought was really really important. The point you made about capital markets activity benefiting from volatility, but dealmaking and advisory fees of still held up. That's a strange mix. You think about volatility and you think that would upset the latter. That didn't happen last quarter.

Speaker 3

It was headline volatility, but it wasn't directionally negative. So it was good volatility for banks because people were motivated to shift around, particularly on single names, but they still got deals done. So it was kind of a perfect mix that really led to an incredible results from the big banks.

Speaker 2

This headline's coming from a page just moments ago speaking to the IEA head saying Europe, we talk a lot about this cushion. Europe has maybe six weeks left of jet fuel. That headline crossing just mama's agust.

Speaker 4

This is what Asia has been dealing with, and now the next stop is going to be Europe. And also what Fati Birol, the head of the IA, speaking to the AP says, warning of possible fight cancelation soon if these supplies remain blocked given what is going on with the trader promote.

Speaker 2

Not good to BEA's just good to see you, sir, Thanks for being Kreeh, Thank you very much, thanks for making a sigh for us. The RF director of Monetary and Capital Markets

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android