Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts.
Radio news. Global central bankers have expressed their full solidarity with the Federal Reserve after the weekend's news as grand jury subpoenas had been served as part of a criminal investigation into the Central Bank and it's chaired Jerome Powell. This is happening at a time that central banks are facing more divergent interest rate paths as well. The ECB now not expected to alter rates for some time to discuss all of this. The Governor of the Bank of
Latvia and ECP Governing Council member Martin Kazaks. Martins Kazaks, good morning. Great to see you in Brussels with us now. The ECB President signed that letter of support for Jerome Powell on behalf of the Governing Council, which you're a member of. What's your view of these events? How worrying is this for central bank independence?
This is bad news because central bank independance is very
critical for central banks to deliver good monetary policy. So the typical outcome that we see from the boss experiences with their morning central bank independence would be inflation device and the potential risk of the anchoring of expectations, which means that the adjustment through monetary policy might be more painful to the economy because one of the elements that we've seen in the past inflation phase, especially in Europe, has been unexpectedly law sacrifice ratios, and one of the
reasons has been the credibility of the central bank policy that has allowed to move rates less to bring inflation down. So this is by all means bad news.
Are you concerned about any pushback from a President Trump on this issue? New Zealand for example, and it's Foreign Affairs minister rebuking the RBNZ for signing that letter, saying that the RBNZ has no role nor should it involve itself in US domestic politics. Are you concerned about any push back from the US against the ECB or other central bankers for that letter.
Well, I would not speculate on that, but I think let's be calm and really be aware in terms of the European case as well, that the independence of central banks and accountability of course of central banks as well, has allowed to deliver on the mandate. And that's why in terms of montre policy in Europe, we are in a good place. And an important element of that has
been independence of the central bank. Independence of the central bank, in my view as well, allows to learn from mistakes because because then the assessment of the policy errors is frank and it is analysis based, it's not politically driven. So this is an advantage to have independent monetary policy rather than a burden.
But could politicians in Europe perhaps be emboldened by what they see across the Atlantic. This is something that City Group has warned about that center bank independence could come under threat in Europe if the move towards shorter dated bond tempts politicians to push for lower interest rates. Is that a concern?
Yes, the risks are there in my view, and they are very strong, especially if the policies become more short term mystic, they are more populist, and then you know, you do not value the stability and delivery of the long term policy efficiency. This is certainly a worry. But the outcome from such a move would of course be negative for the European population, so that would be a very bad choice.
Are there particular members of the euro Area where you see that as being a risk.
No, I would not comment on that. You know, things can happen in any country. You know, and the politics could move, but this has been the track record that we have been delivering in Europe, in my view, strengthens the case for dependence of the central bank because of it doing a good job so far. But as I mentioned, of course, independence should come hand in hand together with accountability.
Okay, so accountability is sort of a necessary precursor in terms of the interest rate path. The head markets aren't pricing in any rate moves this year. Are you comfortable with that? Outlook?
The mode is a brandy that we have had so far has been the appropriate one. So it's meeting by meeting, data dependent open mind, seeing what the trends in the economy are and then reacting to that, and this has allowed us to be in a good place. The decisions of the past years have been appropriate once and we are at the tour get spot on now as well at two percent, with services inflation as well gradually coming down to two percent. But it does not mean that
we can be relaxed. Uncertainty remains very high, and that means that you know, there are multiple of shocks that might hit us, and that in my view still very strongly supports the current models operandi let's not give too much forward guidance in terms of the rates. What is important for the markets to understand is our reaction function and the market's understand it. In my view, so that is good news.
Would something like an end to Russia's war in Ukraine be an issue that could shift your view and the Governing Council's view on interest rates in the future.
That, of course would be one of the elements, because ending this negative shock would be beneficial. But of course one needs to understand what kind of piece is it going to be. Is it a good piece with economic growth, political certainty, or is it just a pause for another outbreak of a conflict. So the outcomes are likely to be very different. But this is only one of the shocks. There are many other shocks that are likely to shape
the future parts of one Tree policy. One of those is the valuations in the financial markets, the risks potentially to financial stability if there is some nonlinear adjustment, But of course also in terms of you know, micropolicies as such, for instance, what happens with the Chinese trade to European markets, what happens with our European competitorness in our export markets? You know, that might weigh down on our economic activity, exert some deflationary pressure, so you can come up so
many various scenarios that visibility still remains relatively low. But the good thing is that we are by and large within the baseline scenario and the current monetary policy is in my view, very appropriate. But meeting, unfortunately still meeting by meeting.
On the issue of Ukraine. The European Commission is going to unveil its plans for Ukraine financing later today as well, which of course is an issue of joint debt. Do the Boulder threats on Greenland made by Donald Trump increased Do you think the chances of more joint debt being issued in Europe for defense spending?
I think for defense join debt is a necessity. It is simply more efficient to resolve defense issues. But let me come back a bit in terms of a policy mix and structural change. Monetary policy, if I'm say so, has delivered, and it's somewhat boring now, which is good news.
The action is not in monetary policy, but the action should be somewhere else, and that is structural policies in Europe with somewhat in my view spend too much time in terms of thinking, you know, what could be the next blow, next outburst of volatility that we will need to take care of. But I would say that the risks are so many they could hit all across the board.
And the key choice and strategy for Europe would be to make our economy stronger overall, to deliver on the increase in living standards, to continue increasing living standards for our population, to strengthen our democracies, and also to make European economy much much stronger and more resilient in this multipolar, geopolitically volatile world. And the only thing to do it is to make our economy stronger. And these are all the structural reforms that have been discussed in the past.
As for financial markets, of course, it is deepening of financial markets single market in financial services that would be the first step that we would need to take, and there've been some moves on that, but still relatively timid. And sometimes the understanding, at least in my way, is like, you know, there's always a question, why do we choose a lot of nothing rather than a bit from something.
By moving into more single market environment, we would unlook the scale we would make our financial markets more dynamic and able to finance our economies, and I would say that is the major move that we need. We need structural improvements to make our economies more dynamic, and this will support defense spending. This will support also job political standing of Europe and we would be pushed around much less.
So it's all about the underlying fundamental strength of the economy and monetary policy by providing stability and being at the target, will help with that. But it's not the job of monetary policy to resolve productivity problems and single market problems.