Arctic Economic Council's Frederiksen Talks Greenland's Business - podcast episode cover

Arctic Economic Council's Frederiksen Talks Greenland's Business

Jan 08, 20269 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Mads Qvist Frederiksen, executive director of the Arctic Economic Council, told Bloomberg Radio everything is on hold for businesses investing in Greenland due to the US interest. He told Caroline Hepker and Stephen Carroll on Bloomberg Daybreak Europe that while Greenlanders are unlikely to agree to a sale, companies remain open to doing busine

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

Speaker 2

The US officials are rushing to come up with options for business deals and other ways to step up links to Greenland after President Trump's renewed demand to take over the island. The Foreign ministers of Denmark and Greenland are due to meet with US Section of State Marco Rubio in Washington next week, joining US now as madss fist Friedrichson, who is executive director for the Arctic Economic Council. Mad's

good to have you on the program today. Thank you for your time, because we'd like to understand what the view of business is in Greenland about the Trump administration's determination that it wants Greenland to be part of the US.

Speaker 1

Yeah, nice to be here on call. It's very uncertain times and all you can say that, and this doesn't only go for for Greenland, but across the Arctic region. There's a lot of uncertainty at them, and uncertainty that's poison for any companies. I just spoke with a group of companies in Greenland the other day and they said that everything is put on hold at the moment. They're not making any decisions until there's small clarification about their future.

Speaker 3

What is the I suppose, how does that affect things like investment, business planning, How do the day to day operations of these companies I suppose move forward when there's such geopolitical uncertainty.

Speaker 1

That's a good question, and I think it's important to remember that, you know, Greenland is still home to fifty six thousand people that wakes up every day and go to work, so yes, they will continue life. Similar to the COVID pandemic being a major disruptor for companies, they were still operating and they will still operate. There are still,

you know, uncertainties around for example, law scale investments. There's certain uncertainties around you know where, also defense investments for example. So right now it's just very dificult to plan ahead. The day to day operations is still the same. You know, ninety seven percent of Greenland's export is from fisheries. Those fishing vessels are still out there fishing. What is interesting though, is the US market is not a particularly big market.

It's actually a very very tiny market for the Greenlandic economy. Europe, China, even Canada is much bigger than the US. So some people, not all, but some people do see it as an opportunity though, to expand into new markets in the US.

Speaker 2

That's interesting given the kind of comments not ruling out the use of military force. Also, we've had further comments about the idea of Greenland being bought by the US or quote, some sort of financial arrangement, as the US Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson suggested only yesterday. Do you get any sense that Greenlandic businesses might accept some kind of financial arrangement with the US.

Speaker 1

I don't think so. I mean they, as the Greenlanders have been saying since twenty nineteen when we heard about this the first time, the Queen and the government and businesses said, you know, Greenland is not for sale, but it's open for business. There is a strong sense, and this is all the statements built from the private sector and from the public sector, that Greenland belongs to its people.

So this idea about a large real estate deal, as the President Trump called it in twenty nineteen, that's not of any interest to the businesses. They want to decide the future themselves. And that's also what Denmark has stated again and again on what Greenland has stated again and again.

Speaker 3

There have been reports of an influenced campaign by the US in Greenland. Do you hear about that from the businesses that you work with or is there a sense that those efforts are continuing.

Speaker 1

Very It's a good question, and it goes back to let me just zoom out briefly for the broad Arctic. There are HYPERD threats across the Arctic. You know, there's talks about Chinese, Russia and etc. Other outside nations influencing and wanting to get into the Arctic. The benefit of the Arctic is that we are quite small communities across

the whole region. There are four million people living there, ten percent of its indigenous, which means it's very easy to see if suddenly someone from outside is trying to influence someone. We have seen, however, we have seen some attempts on digital manipulation or online manipulation of people. We saw some AI videos being spread a few years ago. We have seen some strains posts. We saw there was a fake document being shared that was supposed to look

like it came from the Greenlandic government. It was completely made up. So we have seen some attempts, but we don't know what countries are behind it.

Speaker 2

Interesting, what is your view then, of what you want to see next and what businesses want to see next. There is this foreign minister's meeting that's happening next week that surely must be quite important. How do you think that the Danish government and indeed the EU, what should they be doing next?

Speaker 1

So first, I mean, yeah, we have to turn off this fire that is on at the moment, and we also need to remain calm and not to panic. And I think this is quite important right now that we still engage in the dialogue and we continue to look further ahead. We have over the past years already seen massive investments coming from is particularly Denmark has invested massively in for example, subse fiber optic cables, deep sea ports,

expansion of ports, et cetera, expansion of one ways. So in the past few years, Denmark has invested massively in Greenland. We are also seeing growing interest from the European Union and I think this will continue. The European Union will update their Arctic policy in the coming months, and I'm sure security will play a role there. And also this whole idea about do use, and I think also we will at least the companies are asking for this. Okay, if you are investing more in defense, let's try to

make sure it also benefit the communities there. So whatever we do in the Arctic, it has to have at least the dual use, quite often also a triple use. The Greenlandic economy is still massively challenged. There's fifty six thousand people. They expect to be forty six thousand people by twenty to fifty Gdpeak growth is rather low, and

there is some structural challenges around the skilled workforce. So Greenland has a lot of challenges when it comes to be an attractive investment environment, not only because of US interest. So we have to deal with that long term.

Speaker 2

Our last thought, if you would, what I hear and read about Greenland is that there has been an attempt to be open with the US in terms of trying to get business deals. Why do you think there hasn't been more interest and more advancement, Let's say in my in other resources, we will know that Greenland is rich in mining resources, but actually getting them out of the ground,

there's not that much going on to do that. With that openness, what do you think has been the hindrance so far to doing more business between the US and Greenland?

Speaker 1

And that's exactly what the companies are asking themselves as well. So there's currently one active mind one open mining Greenland. There are more than around fifty one hundred minds that could open if they just get an investor. We have seen some mining activity from the US in the south of Greenland the past year, but that's also the first time that's been so much activity. I think a lot of it comes down that this is a political wish. I don't believe that the business society of community in

the US has this interesting Greenland. This is from the top of the political level. And that also reflected that it is very hard to tell companies where to go and invest if there is not a good investment case. Generally, Greenland is challenged by lack of infrastructure, small populations, so economy of scale is a challenge, but it does have opportunities within for example tourism, and we have seen a few US investors, for example, investing in hotels in Greenland,

but it is at a very very small level. But this is not only about the US not investing too much in Greenland. This is international companies and investors around the world. A lot of people are talking about Greenland not too many people are investing in Greenland, and this is not helping what is happening at the moment.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android