Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.
Joining us now for the next thirty minutes or so, the perfect guest. Jim's out, the president of Apollo Global Management. Jim, it's good to see you.
Good morning, Good morning as always.
Congratulations on the new time talk because someone's focused to you for a number of months.
Thank you. It's been a long journey and I appreciate the note.
Well, let's get straight into it. You've called it macro paralysis. What is it now?
Well, it is. I mean I sit here this morning and this really can't be a surprise. The reality of the surprise is a little bit more painful for everybody to digest. But this administration was very clear during the campaign what their objective was. They really wanted to revitalize American industry. They wanted to bring back manufacturing, focus on energy, focus on industrial renaissance, and tariffs, as Amrita said, tariff's taxes and deregulation with a three legged stool. And right
now the focus is on tariffs. They have been probably signaling I know you have Secretary Lutnik on later on this morning, but they've been signaling this was the dialogue. This is obviously a long negotiation, but again, this was part of the administration's agenda. This is what they wanted to accomplish. They've been very clear in the communication. So the pain of the announcement is being felt this morning
in the market. But again I'm not saying preaching patients and perspective, but certainly this should not be a surprise. And I think now as we think about the big trends in the last twenty thirty years, the first of which is globalization. Globalization is not going to be like we have seen it in the past. It's a new global world order. How the US manufacturing and financial base fits into that as a TBD, but certainly it's going to be one that plays out over the next several months.
I can't think of many people outside of you and the team, more down into the c suite and corporate America. How are they planning for the changes in the global economy that you and the team are anticipating A plans going ahead? Do they on hold? Are they totally derailed?
Yeah? Listen, I've used that's the term macro paralysis, because I think we came into the year the busiest folks on Wall Street were supposed to be the M and A bankers and the ECM folks, and that has not taken place, and so the pace of broad activity in
the public markets has certainly been muted. And I think this really plays into and I've been on the show before talking about the role of public markets and the role of private markets, and not just private credit, but overall private markets, and you're going to see this will be a turning point where private markets play a larger role for a lot of these corporates that are still they have long term plans, whether it's what's going on in technology, energy mining, a lot of US domestics. Who's
going to finance this reshoring? That's part of the master plan? So no doubt, I think in c suites and in boardrooms there's vision, there's a desire, but the practical reality is things have come to a stop. And I know you're going to have Torston on later on today the
soft data. When you see what's going on on with consumers, consumer concern, corporate concern, it's really certainly it's amazing what the President has been able to do in seventy five days, what four hundred basis points didn't do over two or three years. As I said here, a couple of years ago, we talked about the tightening of financial conditions. It didn't happen. The US consumer led in a massive rally and a strength in the US economy in seventy five days. Talk
of today has really slowed down the economy. So the soft data and anecdotes would tell you that we have the recession went from a one to five to one in three. That now, depending on who you talk to, it's north of fifty percent. It's probably fifty percent going higher depending on what happens on the ninth.
There's a lot to unpack there. I want to go back to something that you said that this shouldn't have been a surprise to anyone, and maybe the objective shouldn't have been a surprise, but the execution is raising some questions for people about how it is going to be through. Is there anything about what you have seen over the past week that makes you materially change some of your strategy about how you go forward, how you advise the c suite.
Sure, well, let's just go through two or three things about investing today, and a lot depends on the portfolio or the liabilities you manage. If you run a domestic US long short fund, this is obviously much more fundamental. We're a long term, long duration investor with a lot of investment great assets. So when you look around the
globe right now, is anything cheap not really. Our rates probably going to be notwithstanding the rate move in the last twenty four hours, Are rates going to be materially higher over the next few years And they have been because of deglobalization probably, And then you have to weigh
the geopolitics. So certainly your risk parameters and how you want to calibrate risk has certainly gone up the last several months, and the idea of the hurdle of an equity return has certainly gone up the last several months. And with base rates high and getting a coupon, it's all about your calibration of risks. So certainly this has taken a situation where in terms of what you can get in base rates, in terms of bonds, in terms of fixed income, in terms of fixed income replacement, it
certainly made the equity risk premium a lot higher. And certainly for us we are in the private equity business, where we are in the equity business, and for us as risk premiums Arisen. It's a really high heartle for equity these days, which.
Raises a question, especially if Apollo has really seen the debt portion of your business grow and exceed what you see in the equity, is that only set to expand, especially if rates are going to remain structurally higher in this new regime.
There's a reason why we positioned our business the way we have over the last five to seven years, not suspecting a day like this would occur. But the reality is around the globe you have millions and millions of folks that are ill prepared, unfortunately for their retirement their pension. I was in Asia and Australia last week. Even as well as the superannuation funds have done for Australia, they do not really have a system on post accumulation and
post retirements. And so around the globe and even in this country, eleven thousand people a day are becoming sixty or turning sixty five. We're ill prepared for the pension system of tomorrow in terms of the needs. And that's why listen what's being written recently about public about private markets, certainly in Larry Fink's letter, it's a tune that we've been talking about the last several years about changing market structure,
the role of private markets with retirement systems financing. What this administration is putting forth. We think we're primed to be a position of First and Maine in what's going on right now, but certainly a wake up call for retirees around the globe.
Jim, let's talk about Europe. There's been a major sentiment shift towards the European side of financial markets and a pullback from the United States. For a long time, we talked about so called US exceptionalism, and one big feature of that, maybe even the secret source Jeff Bezos himself said it is risk seeking capital, abundant markets, really really deep markets, tons of liquidity. Is any of that under threat?
Well, I think that what you're seeing is maybe not the US going down, but also parts of our globe coming up. I mean the Drogy letter that was put out last September that everybody had in the file. They've quickly pulled it out the last three or four weeks because certainly this administration has woken woken Europe up, and as they wake up, they're saying, how do we create an economic environment where capital can grow, capital being created
for growth companies. Think about a securitization market. You've got a twenty three trillion economy with a nascent securitization market. And I think this administration has woken up Europe in terms of thinking about how they actually fund, finance and grow in this industrial renaissance that's going around the globe
right now. So it's certainly been a massive wake up call, and I think again you're going to see private market solutions or many of these countries, companies and industries, not only in the US but in Western Europe as they rise to the challenge.
One discussion point has been that US exceptionalism is predicated both on the AI trade as well as fiscal stimulus that's going into reverse a bit maybe at the same time that the fiscal expansion is going on in places like Europe, in places like China. How much do you see that continuing in terms of market performance and something that you're willing to follow.
Well, what you're really addressing is mostly on the equity performance, in the public equity performance where public equity dollars go. Certainly there's been a massive amount of global investment in the US equity markets in the S and P, and that's going to be muted as there's a global pullback as investors think about other parts of the globe right now.
But the bigger question, which you're really getting at, is if a recession coming into If I was here six months ago, we would have said a recession in twenty five twenty six was one in five, and now that's certainly one and two, if not higher. What's going on
over the next several weeks. The other scenario is the stagflation scenario that went from a one in six one and seven to probably one in five right now one in four, And that's the concern that's got to be the concern of policy makers in the US but also around the globe.
Just building on that, before it sounded like you didn't think the FED could cut rates.
You said that this is going to be.
A permanently higher rate environment, and that happens with both the US as well as Europe. Why you think that they're destined to allow that kind of scenario.
No, but I think they have a When you look at the balance of the dual mandate right now, it's certainly much more challenging. Certainly the White House is going to want to see them cut rates. But and certainly some of the economic data in terms of slower growth, would portray that to be the next move. I think the Fed is going to have to practice much more patience in here, Lisa.
This is the number one question in financial markets right now. Is that Fed put constraint because of higher inflation further down the road?
Right now, the market is betting that, No, it is not, because what you are seeing is more than three rate cuts, almost four rate cuts being priced into the market by year end, with some like City saying that they're going to accelerate them, and others like Morgan Stanley taking away their call key question at a time we're coming off a real inflationary bomp.
Jim.
We caught up with a Treasury secretary yesterday in the immediate aftermath of the announcement from the President, and he was asked by a Marie about the equity market selloff since February, the highst of the year, and he pointed to the nastack and said, it seems like a Max seven problem and not a MAGA problem. Now you can push back against that, pour some cold water over it, but he has kind of got a point. There's something else going on here outside of just trade.
Well that goes back to my point earlier, like you know when you look around, like what as an investor right now, are things cheap? No, they've gone down in price, But don't confuse a price move with something being cheap. And it was a marketplace that the mag seven took the market up, and now the mag seven is taken the market down. But again, this is a very very complex economy. And again this is the big theme that
we've been talking for years. And I know we're talking about financial markets in the equity market, but these public markets only reflect a very very small portion of the US economy. Yes, these are great growth companies or global companies, but so much of the US economy, so much of the European economy is private companies. And how do they navigate this? And that's what gives us a great deal of enthusiasm because what's going on for investors in private
markets but also for companies needing capital. There's a lot more tools in the toolbox than there was a decade ago.
Can we just finish that on data centers which has been a major thing. Sure, not just in public markets. There have been some warnings about over capacity in the last few weeks. How are you even the team navigates in that.
We've certainly taken on much more as a debt provider to date. Certainly those who have been around for a few decades, you feel like you're seeing a bit of the conversation about dark fiber from ninety eight to ninety nine and two thousand and one, two thousand and two. Build it and they will come. Certainly, there are economics that still need to be developed in terms of the
economic model of the data center business. A lot of capital has been created upfront to purchase the land, secure the power, create the facility, but who's the long term off take of that? Who's the long term capital? And again this goes back to the conversation I had earlier about the pension deficit issue. There's a tremendous amount of long term capital that wants to be matched up with that opportunity set. But to date we've been much more
of a debt provider. But I certainly think that questions that were raised last week by Joe Sai pretty legitimate questions about the long term economics and the short term supply demand mismatch about how these things come online and what the economics are.
Jim.
We could talk to you well, Monik, and I've got a job to do, though we appreciate your time.
Always a driver, BUYE.
Thank you, Jim. Jim's out to there, the president of Apollo Global Management,
