Government Snooping Allowed by One Court (Audio) - podcast episode cover

Government Snooping Allowed by One Court (Audio)

Dec 12, 20163 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

(Bloomberg) -- Harvard Law School professor and Bloomberg View Contributor Noah Feldman discusses why one U.S. appeals court, allows warrantless government surveillance. He speaks with June Grasso and Michael Best on "Bloomberg Law."

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

And now it's time to check our daily Bloomberg Law Brief, exploring legal issues in the news. Today, Bloomberg Law host Student Grosso and Michael Best discuss a US appeals Court ruling allowing government surveillance without a warrant. They speak to Noah Feldman, a professor at Harvard Law School and a Bloomberg View contributor. Now, will you explain the situation a

little bit? What actually happened? Yeah, there was an investigation that involved a man named Mohammed Mohammad, who was eventually convicted of an attempted bombing in Portland, Oregon, on Black Friday of at a Christmas tree raising ceremony. And as part of that investigation, the which incidentally came out of a sting operation, an FBI sting operation. So as part of that investigation, the FBI had um traces on communications

of an un person outside the US. It may well have been someone with whom Mohammed was communicating in Yemen, but we don't know that for sure from the records, and the US government recorded, the FBI recorded that Mohammed was sending emails from inside the US to this person. The government then took those emails, read those emails and brought them to a U. S court and got a warrant to investigate Mohammed, and that led to the process ultimately in which he was um stung and then arrested

that and sent to prison. And what did the Ninth Circuits say in upholding his conviction. The Ninth Circuit said that as long as the initial wire tapping, that is to say, the interception of the communications was targeted not at Mohammed, but it's someone outside the US, a non American outside the US, than any email els by Americans written in the US, that the government happened to intercept and read or quote unquote incidental to the national initial investigation.

And because they were incidental, they were permitted without a wired without a warrant under the fourth Amendment of the Constitution. And that is Harvard Law School professor and Bloomberg View contribute to Noah Feldman speaking to Bloomberg Law, host, To Grasso and Michael Best. You can listen to Bloomberg Law weekdays at one pm Wall Street Time here on Bloomberg Radio Now. Among the top legal stories from Bloomberg Law in France, I am F Managing Director Christine Lagarde in

court today. She's accused of failing to prevent a massive government payout to businessman Ber not to pay eight years ago. That's what led Guard was the French finance minister. She has denied the charges and that's this morning's Bloomberg Law Brief. You can find more legal news at Bloomberg Law dot com and Bloomberg BNA dot com. Attorneys will find exceptional

legal research and business development tools there as well. Visit Bloomberg Law dot com Bloomberg b and A dot com for more information

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android