Bloomberg Law Brief: Paul McCartney Sues Sony (Audio) - podcast episode cover

Bloomberg Law Brief: Paul McCartney Sues Sony (Audio)

Jan 20, 20173 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Terence Ross, a partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman, discusses U.S. copyright laws that could help Paul McCartney regain the rights to one of his songs from Sony Corp. He speaks with June Grasso on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law."

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

The Bloomberg Lab Brief is brought to you by American Arbitration Association. Business disputes are inevitable, resolve faster with the American Arbitration Association, the global leader in alternative dispute resolution for over ninety years. And we're at a dr dot org. And now it is time for the daily Bloomberg Lab Brief,

exploring legal issues in the news. And Today, Bloomberg Law host Doing Grosso discusses why former Beatle Paul McCartney is suing Sony for refusing to give him back the rights to some of his music. She speaks with Terence Ross, a partner at Kaden Mutchen Rosenman Terry explain how copyright termination works. Essentially, there was this notion when we redid

the copyright laws in ninety six. UM, this popular notion that big companies, recording companies, publishing houses, movie studios were taking advantage of the creators of works, and especially when they were young and they were new uh in their fields, and that they were obtaining the rights to the copyrights

to their work um for relatively little money. UM. I don't know if there was ever any actual evidence to support that, but we put into the Copyright Act um two provisions that allowed these creators of works to at a future date terminate assignments of the copyrights that they had given away UM in an effort to re monetize UM the value of those works. And if they had passed away in the interim, that right to terminate UM was passed along to their heirs, whether these spouse or

children or grandchildren. So McCartney's lawyers started sending notices to Sony in two thousand and eight stating he's desire to reclaim the copyright. Sony declined to do so. Why would Sony agree to that without a court sight, Because it is so complicated to comply with the regular regulations that

I allow you to terminate. It would be a mistake, in my view on Sony's part um to ever agree that they were done properly, because there is always the risk that McCartney will have botched the termination procedures and therefore Sony will get to keep the rights. And as Terence Ross, a partner at kden Muchen Rosenman, speaking with Bloomberg Law host Jun Grasso. You can listen to Bloomberg Law weekdays at one pm. Wall Street time here on

Bloomberg Radio. And that's this morning's Bloomberg Law Brief. You can find more legal news at Bloomberg law dot com and Bloomberg b n A dot com. Attorneys will find exceptional legal research and business development tools there as well. Visit Bloomberg law dot com and Bloomberg b NA dot com for more information

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android