Live on Sunday Night with Bill Cunningham 9/8/2024 - podcast episode cover

Live on Sunday Night with Bill Cunningham 9/8/2024

Sep 09, 20241 hr 54 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Willie is live across America on Sunday night!

Transcript

Speaker 1

Portions of the Bill Cunningham Show may be pre recorded.

Speaker 2

Willie Rock You.

Speaker 1

By Choice Hotels, Econo Lodge and Roadway in Hotels are serving up double points for every qualifying stay book at Choice Hotels dot com. Thal Here's the man who's been recognized as radio's best, the recipient of not one but two prestigious Marconi Awards for his broadcast exodts.

Speaker 2

The one and only Bill Cunningham.

Speaker 3

Nor Billy Cunningham, the great American. Welcome to you this glorious Sunday night, and thanks for listening. As we go thither and fro this more, I'm trying to listen to meet the depressed Kristin Welker, and one of her guests was Senator Sanders. This self, Bernie says, I'm a socialist, which means Marxiston communists from New Hampshire. He's certainly the guy. I'm sorry Vermont. He's the senator from one of the

senatorsrom Vermont, and that guy is a socialist. In fact, Bernie Senators says he's a socialist, but not as bad as Kamala Harris. According to every poll. When she was in the US Senate, she was to the left of Bernie Sanders. Not much space out there. She's to the left of Elizabeth Warren. So the question was asked by Kristin welker Well Senator Senator Sanders Well, at this point it appears that Vice President Kamala Harris is softening her

left wing positions of many issues. Went over the southern border, went after reparations, went after defund the police, went after criminals, prisoners voting, went after all the liberal baskets of crazy left wing ideas. And he kind of looked at her and said, well, that's not the case, and she said, what do you mean, it's not the case. Sanders then said, well, you have to say certain things get elected. But once she gets into office, we know what she's going to do.

And I thought, Jesus, Mary and Joseph. There it is loud, proud and sassy. What Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Kamala Harris and anyone else on the left intends to do. They say one thing they don't believe, to trick you into believing a lie. Then once they get into office, they do the exact opposite, counting on our media not to cover it. Our media is corrupt, Our media doesn't tell

you the truth. As evidence of that, you might recall the Caitlyn Collins on CNN, She's on every weekday Night was on with Bill Maher and they played a cut from Colbert that I don't listen to and watch, and I'm sure you don't either. Stephen Colbert and Colbert CBS Late Night was interviewing Caitlyn Collins and he made this statement, well, of course, CNN is an objective, independent news operation. Immediately the New York audience burst out in laughter and Colbert

so that wasn't meant to be a joke. Oh, well, the fact is, we know what CNN is, we know what the mainstream media is. They're an appendage of the left wing Democratic Party. They've lost any vestige of independence or objectivity years ago. Look at PBS, look at ABC, NBC, the New York Times, whatever it is. They don't report the news. They report all the news that fits the bias,

and then they printed. And so this morning, Senator Bernie Sanders, the self professed socialist, said loud, proud and sase that Kamala Harris will return to her left wing San Francisco roots once she gets elected. Now, you would think that'd be a big story now NFL is dominant today, My

be left Bengals loss is what they always do. The first couple games against the Patriots without Belichick, without Brady, it made no difference that Bengals and Joe Burrow got drilled, which is what they do at least in the first two games of the season. And so I'm looking at that, and there was no news on it at all. So her main political fellow traveler in the US Senate just made public what you and I think is reality. She

will not govern from the center. She would be the most far left wing radical president with Tim Waltz of Minnesota we've ever had and he just said it. But it's no big deal. Now it's a big deal to me. It should be a big deal to you. I'll use this analogy. I have a lot of good friends on the golf course, and we talk about our wives, talk about our kids, talk about our grandkids, talk about health issues,

talk about current events, talk about politics. And I have some great friends Kenny and no Wally and Mike and Tony and Steve, and Rick and Paul and Rob and others. Great majority and more or less conservative like I am. It's pretty hard to be a little bit older and have some assets and not be somewhat conservative, knowing what it takes to get there. But I have one of my golfing friends is quite liberal, and I like him.

It's okay, doesn't bother me. You can have different political viewpoints and it's acceptable to me to be your friend. I'm not gonna tell someone you can't be my friend because we disagree on politics when we agree in many other aspects of human life. And so if that if that friend of mine who was a liberal was running for a high political office, what I vote for my friend who was a liberal. Absolutely not not even close.

On the other hand, what I vote for a friend of mine who was a conservative and had my same political viewpoints. Absolutely? If Rick Grennell, who is a gay man who was part of the Trump administration, if he would run for political office, I would vote for Rick Grennell in a heartbeat because he represents my political viewpoint. And so some of my friends I get into some arguments with other than my golfing friends, tend to be a bit conservative. Say to me, why in the hell

you're voting for Trump? Especially women. I was at a dinner party about three weeks ago, there was three four couples there and I had to defend my vote on Donald Trump because he's and that there were women came at me about he's a terrible person. He cheated on his wife and wives. He may have had sex with a porn star. I don't think he did, but let's face it, if he did, it wouldn't shock me. He had sex with Marlon Maples, I guess when he was

married to his first wife, et cetera. And there were some businesses that he bankrupted because they weren't successful and he was hard to deal with in business. All that stuff may be true. I've met the man, I've spoken to him several times. To be in his presence is a good thing. It's a happy day because he is a dominant, alpha male who's fun to be with. We had a golf game set up where Sean Hannity and

I were going to play. I'm sorry, John Kasik, the governor of Ohio at the time, was going to play Trump and Hannity. It was going to be New York versus Ohio. Had some rain and it didn't develop. And that's fine. Good guy. Donald Trump is a man's man and a woman's man. But these women are telling me about all the moral peccadillos that he had. So I pointed out to them, you know what Bill Clinton spoke as a proud representative of the National Democratic Party at

the DNC in Chicago. Did he not took about an hour? Bill Clinton babbled on and on and on at a convention attacking Donald Trump as a sexual philanderer and abuses women. That was the allegation by the DNC. And who do they invite to speak Bill Clinton? Who spent seventeen trips in Jeffrey Epstein's plane, whether it was Monica Lewinski or Kathleen Willie or Paula Corbin Jones. He had dozens and dozens of women over the years. He's whine dined and betted.

And they picked him to come to their convention, a convention at which they attacked Donald Trump's peccadillos. And they also brought in Oprah Winfrey and the Obamas to complain about wealth. Wealth. Oprah Winfrey's worth three billion dollars and the Obamas are worth hundreds of millions, and they were brought on to complain about wealth. And so when someone would say to me some liberal women. I know many lawyers. Lawyers tend to be liberal, especially female attorneys. Why are

you voting for Trump? And I'll say to them, you know what, I'm not voting for Trump, and I can't when they say it to me, I can't believe you're voting for Trump. I say, I'm not voting for Trump. I'm voting for the First Amendment. I'm voting for freedom of religion and freedom of speech. I'm voting to see that unborn babies get born because during the so called

process of abortion, someone is killed in that process. I'm voting for the right to speak my opinion and not be censored by the federal government, as Mark Zuckerberg was by the DOJ, the FBI, and the irs intimidated in a not covering state. I'm voting for secure borders. I'm not voting for Donald Trump. I'm voting for legal immigration. Do you favor that I'm voting for election integrity to include mandatory voter ID. Do you support that I'm voting

not for Donald Trump. I'm voting for a second Amendment and the right to defend myself and my family. I'm not voting for Donald Trump. I'm voting for police to be respected once again. Over the weekend, there were two more cops killed. There's going to be something in the range of three hundred cops shot this year. And that Minneapolis, Minnesota, they're offering one hundred and ten thousand dollars to join the police force. They're down thirty percent of the force.

And Cincinnati we're down twenty percent here in Cincinnati, and San Francisco is thirty percent. Five thousand cops have left NYPD. I'm voting for law enforcement. I'm not voting for Trump. I'm voting for law enforcement that respected once again. I'm voting in his sense for law and order and to end the criminal protests to trespass and burn our cities. And what's happening in New York City almost every day is the disgrace. Five thousand individuals tagging the city, disrupting traffic,

burglarizing cars and homes, and no one's arrested. You know, crime is up, but arrest their way down. I'm voting for personal responsibility in the end of the revolving door, where criminals are put back on the street and with no bonds whatsoever. That's Kamala Harris I'm voting for a return of our troops from foreign countries and the end to America's involvement in foreign conflicts. I'm voting for the continued appointment of conservative federal judges. I'm not voting for Trump.

I'm voting for all those things. I'm voting for my religion as a practicing a Roman Catholic. I'm voting to fight against human child trafficking. Something in the range of seventy five thousand children are missing and our system and they're being trafficked all over the place. I'm voting to keep men out of women's sports. Voting for Trump. I'm voting to keep men and boys out of girls' locker rooms. That's what I'm voting for. I'm voting for a peace

process that works in the Middle East. And I'm voting for the military and for the veterans. I'm voting for senior citizens. I'm voting for doing away with all the freebies given to the illegals that cost billions of dollars and keeping the money right here at home. I'm not voting for a person. I'm voting for the United States of America. That's what I'm voting for. So if I had a good golfing friend of mine, I'll call him sweet Lips, and he's a great guy. But he's a liberal,

sure as hell, wouldn't vote for him. Wouldn't vote for him one bit. They're traitors to the cause the media in this country. And so I'm not voting for Trump. I'm voting for all those things I just discussed with you. And so when I tell these liberal female attorneys that's what I'm doing, they shake their head and say, well, he's a bad man. I don't care if he's a good man or a bad man. God will judge that

at the conclusion of his life. I'm voting for his policies that worked magnificently for four years, and the policies of Tim Waltz and Kamala Harris. Whether it's Minneapolis or Chicago, or San Francisco or Austin, Texas. Think of the status of the police force right now in Austin or Atlanta or Washington, d C. They've had twenty to fifty years, many times one hundred years of running these magnificent cities that have been built up over generations. As the envy

of the world destroyed by democratic liberal policies. So if a friend of mine was a liberal and I love that person dearly, I would never vote for them for public office. And it's someone that I personally disliked was running for political office whose policies I supported, I'd vote for the person I dislike and not the person that I like, because it's about policies, not about personalities and peccadillos.

Can you smell when I'm cooking? Now, let's continue later on, We're going to play some comments of Elton John Crocodile Rock and Rocketman and Philadelphia Freedom. He might be in trouble now. Elton John has says n things nice things about Donald Trump? Are you kidding me? And I couldn't care one twit what Dick Cheney says, or who's going to vote for? Think of the disastrous policies of George

Bush forty three and Dick Cheney. Think about what those policies did in Iraq and Afghanistan and doubling the national debt. And he left the country in twenty eight in terrible shape as as opposed to the one he found in the year two thousand. Also, right now, Iraq is the province of Iran, chaos in the Middle East because of Dick Cheney. His judgment stinks. It's in the toilet. I wouldn't pay one twit to what Dick Cheney or Bush

forty three says about anything. They have helped to destroy this great country of ours, ushering in the government and the policies of Barack Husain Obama and Joe Biden. Well, let's continue. We have three lines open. We have a call from Tampa and from Pittsburgh. And of course the Panthers beat up on the Bearcats, my Bearcats on on Saturday. It was a bad day in Cincinnati for football. But we have three lines open now one eight six six six four seven, seven three three seven. I'm not voting

for Donald Trump, although I like the guy. I'm voting for his policies. The question on the table tonight is does that make sense to you? Bill Cunningham, the Great American with you every Sunday night. And of course, we had another terrible shooting a few days ago in Apalachi High School and a little bit north of Atlanta. Terrible shooting and because there was an arms school resource all

officer present, many many lives were likely saved. And you might recall this is poorly reported because it is so bad about Kamala Harrison her judgment. Now, Kamala Harrison twenty nineteen said that school resource officers should not be in schools. There's too many guns around. Why should an officer have

a gun in school? It sends the wrong message. Well, Cold Gray, fourteen years old, was a mentally ill individual given on his thirteenth birthday by his now indicted father, and they are fifteen, and his father knew because police had been to his home that he had threatened schools in the past. Why he wasn't arrested is beyond me.

But to make things worse, Cold Gray's mother, her name is Marcy Gray, lived about two hundred miles away from the student's home, and she got a text from Cold Gray early on that morning and about nine to fifty am, about thirty minutes before the shooting began, she called the school to warn them that her son was likely to do something terrible. The mother called the school about an unspecified extreme emergency involving her son Colt sometime before the

shooting began. It was a ten minute telephone call placed from Marcy Gray's phone to the school at nine fifty am according to the Washington Post, and there's no reporting on what the school did with that information. On top of the fact that the father should have been and died it for what he did secondary murder, in voluntary manslaughter, etc. He's going to spend the rest of his life in jail,

as should Cold Gray, who's got mental problems. But nonetheless, the only reason there wasn't ten twenty fifty killed or wounded as an armed officer in the school put his service reapon on to Colt Gray and told him to drop the weapon, and he did. Then Colt Gray went to the floor. If the policies of Kamala Harris were in effect, there'd be many, many dead students at Appalachi High School. And that's a matter of judgment. Would you agree. She also wants to reimagine the police and get the

police out of major American cities. Get them out and when she changes her view now, just harken back to the comments this morning of Senator Bernie Sanders, the socialist Marxist, who said, of course she's got to say certain things to get elected, but we all know what that means. She's gonna she is a liberal socialist and she'll be

with us once she takes office. Imagine that lie every day that Kamala Harris and Tim Waltz is telling the American people they have to get up every day to say and no, wait a minute, I can't really do interviews because I may not have time to think and reflect back on my real position. I have to lie to you to get elected. And so if that's the case, white vote for her in the first place. If seventy percent of American voters do not know her policies because

they have not been published, not been out there. And Dana bash Trump, the interviewer from CNN, did a terrible job of interviewing both of them, no follow up questions, no clips whatsoever. Show the clips of what you've said, and you say, not my values have not changed. Well, it looks like your policies have. And now this morning Senator Bernie Sanders said her policies aren't going to change at all, but she has to lie to you to get your vote. That was a rare moment of truthfulness

out of Bernie Sanders's mouth. Imagine police out of the cities, cops, school resource officers out of the schools. Imagine a wide open border. Imagine seventy five thousand more kids sexually trafficked because of the policies at Kamala Harris. And she believes in reparations. She believes in the entire menu of left doing soles positions, and she can't tell you what they are now because she can't do interviews because some good

interviewer may out her as what she is. Just use the words of Senator Bernie Sanders telling you, of course, she hasn't changed at all, but she has to say certain things to get your vote. In other words, she has to lie to win. Wow, let's continue. We have a pull bank of telephone calls all over the country. I want to get to them as soon as possible, including my caller from Pittsburgh, Bill cunning and the Great American with you and all great Americans. Every Sunday at

least one outlet Bright Bart's picked it up. And also Fox News that we're going to play it for you in a couple of minutes that Bernie Sanders was asked on Meet the Press this morning as to whether or not Harris's going to drop her far left policies in order to win the election. Now, I would anticipate the answer should have been, well, I haven't spoken to her

recently about that. We'll see what happens. But not Bernie Sanders of Vermont, the so called independent candidate as self professed Sarks socialist Marxist, who said he gave a candid answer when I asked whether or not Kamala Harris is going to flip flop, and the reporter said, Kristen Welker said, quote, she's previously supported medicare for all. Now she went over a whole list of things that she said she supported for,

by the way, thirty five years. So this is not a case where someone is thirty, thirty five or forty years old and based upon new life experiences might change one position on something. Kamala Harris is sixty years old and she's been in political office for about thirty to

thirty five years, so these are well developed opinions. And every time she ran for either Attorney General California or the local county prosecutor's office, or US Senate or the Vice presidency, she ran to the left to Bernie Sanders because that's what she had to do to get elected. Now she's flip flopping on all her positions because she has to get elected to something else. But once she returns,

once she goes into office, god forbid. On January the twentieth, at noon, she's going to refer back to her water level, which is of course the most radical left wing politics in America. These are San Francisco liberals, not labels. Reality of what she plans to do to your city of Pittsburgh, what she plans to do in Louisiana, what she plans to do in Baltimore, what she plans to do in Tampa, what she plans to do in Austin, what she plans to do in Louisville, or Idaho or Oklahoma. And she

can do great damage, which has already transpired. So in a few minutes, we're going to play few that exchange between between the host and Bernie Sanders, which was a rare moment of truth in other words, So so that's the name of that too. We're going to play that for you later when we get it ready. So let's

take a few calls and we have that prepared. We're going to play it for you, and if a line becomes available eight sixty six six four seven seven three three seven, So let's continue, We'll go to let's go to Danny and Oklahoma and Oklahoma State had one hell of a game Saturday, Danny. Welcome to the Bill Cunningham shown Danny, how are you.

Speaker 4

I'm doing great, Bill, thanks for taking my call.

Speaker 2

Uh.

Speaker 4

Yeah, I was a little surprised that the Cowboys came back and meat the Razorbacks, so they were behind I think a couple of touchdowns Arkansas.

Speaker 3

Yeah.

Speaker 4

Yeah, that was a good game, went into double overtime. Yeah, Bill, could could you and you always do a good job, you know giving Uh, you know, the American people objective, you know, information on you know, the issues of the day. But explain to the American people why I vote for Kamala Harris is a vote for Marxim's Marxism and a vote for Donald Trump is a vote for not only freedom and economic growth, but to the end of this insane hyperinflation.

Speaker 3

Well, you know Marxism, Karl Marx, etc. Trucidism, etc. Communism, socialism has all branches of the same tree which the government controls the means and method of expression, means, the method of manufacturing. So according to Kamala Harris, she wants to make sure that Zuckerberg and all the social media centers are controlled by the federal government. She's testified before and when she was in the Senate that she thinks

disinformation and misinformation needs to be punished. Now, the best remedy for bad speech is better speech or good speech. And up to now, the constitutional right under the First Amendment means something. But when the government tells so media companies what to do, what not to do, what to publish,

and what not to publish, we got a problem. And Mark Zuckerberg said two weeks ago that they receive emails from high government officials in the DOJ and the FBI telling them of so called Russian disinformation that looked as if that was manifest through the Hunter Biden laptop. Now, the FBI had the laptop since December of twenty nineteen,

on a year before the election. They knew it was all legitimate, and that was a roadmap to the corruption of Joe Biden, and a third of his voters said that if they knew he was that corrupt, they wouldn't

have selected him in the first place. So when the social media and the newspapers are told don't publish that information and then you got fifty one so called CIA scholars running around telling the lie, repeating it that anything in the media that would reflect the truth about Joe slash Hunter Biden would be what would be thrown out the window would be censored. That is the role of government is to open up the pass of freedom to

all of us. The role of government it is not to censor information that is disinformation or misinformation, as described by of course Kamala Harris and Danny boy we have now the cut. Well, it should be the biggest story in the world today, even bigger then Dallas beating Cleveland so badly. Here is Kristin Welker this morning with Senator Sanders of Vermont, a fellow traveler of Kamala Harris. Danny Gleason hit It described.

Speaker 5

Vice President Kamala Harris as a progressive. She has previously supported medicare for all, now she does not. She's previously supported a ban on fracking, now she does not. These, Senator, are ideas that you have campaigned on. Do you think that she is abandoning her progressive ideals.

Speaker 6

No, I don't think she's abandoning her ideals. I think she's trying to be pragmatic and doing what she thinks is right in order to win the election.

Speaker 3

My own view is.

Speaker 2

It's likely different.

Speaker 6

I think that in America today there are a lot of people, rural people, working class people who no longer believe that the United States Congress and government represents their interests, who dominated by big money interests.

Speaker 3

So there it is, Senator Sanders, she's changing her views to win the election, to be pragmatic. In other words, let's take the covers off. She has to lie to you to win. So if you vote for Kamala Harris, you're voting for a known liar who will see anything they had elected. And then Bernie Sanders, her fellow traveler, has said, just there this morning, I meet the press, and once she gets into office, she'll revert back to

being a socialist. Socialism means government controls information, the means of manufacturing, the means of production of products, and the free market means nothing. Most of us still believe in capitalism, about thirty five percent believe in socialism in this country because of what the schools have done to our kids. But when Sanders says she's lying to you to get

your vote, do you believe it? Let's continue to go to Mark and Baltimore, the home of the Ravens, beaten up by the Chiefs on Thursday Night, Mark and Baltimore. Welcome to the Bill Cunningham Show. Mark, how are you.

Speaker 7

I'm good, Thank you so very very much. That was a top loss by the Ravens. We're still looking at our wounds over that.

Speaker 3

But look, Mark, I'm a Bengals fan, and listen to this little factoid. Since Zach Taylor became the head coach of the Bengals the year before Joe Burrow got here, in the first two games of the season, Zach Taylor is one and nine, and since Joe Burrow has arrived, Joe Burrow is won and eight. In the first two games of the year. The team was thoroughly unprepared to play. And if that's the team that's going to play this year, the Bengals will become the Bungles and jab is going

to be Bengalized. I hope it doesn't happen. Please continue.

Speaker 7

I have great shippets, I have simpathy for the crew of people of the great state of Ohio. I have some friends that are Bengals fans, and a certainly very very very brown.

Speaker 2

That's very very true.

Speaker 7

But mister Cunningham, I have to agree with everything you said. It was so great the way that you were talking about to your liberal lady lawyer friends about how you're not voting from Trumpet's like what I say. I'm voting for his policies like a secure border, oil independence, less of our citizens living from paycheck to paycheck, no wars, a good economy, food prices being down, and one and

one and one. Kamala Harris, I don't understand why, according to some polls, she has an approval rating that makes her like the greatest thing since slice bread, her bus. Total reproductive rights isn't about reproductive rights at all. It's about killing babies in Maryland. Here in the great state of Maryland, we're one of three states allowing abortion up to nine months and sometimes even after birth. And we tried to get that on the ballot to take that off,

and we failed. What happened to that baby's God given rights? The Democrats don't believe in God. They purport to act like God and control everything.

Speaker 3

Mark, let me answer you this question. I went on an HHS website government website, and it recommended that when a woman. By the way, women get pregnant, not men. That may be shocking, but nonetheless, when a woman gets pregnant, they recommend the federal government recommends prenatal care starting at the sixth week, and it should start between the sixth and the tenth week of pregnancy. Now, if on one hand,

the federal government says that's a baby. You don't get prenatal care to assist or to a tumor, or to a callus, or to a growth. You get prenatal care to a baby. Am I correct?

Speaker 7

You are?

Speaker 3

Yes?

Speaker 2

Has a heartbeat?

Speaker 3

Heartbeat begins about six or seven weeks. So if the government says you get prenatal care because a healthy baby, baby is required in today's world, give you give your baby every chance to live. And every abortion, a baby dies. And the government says, in one hand, prenatal care at the sixth week, the tenth week mark, you got to begin prenatal care. And on the other hand, you're saying it's not a baby, then what the hell is it? So assist?

Speaker 7

Right, it's not health care. It's not healthcare. They're the right to take my tax dollars for that.

Speaker 3

Either is abortion health care for the baby.

Speaker 7

It's not a healthcare right, No, it's a murder for a baby.

Speaker 3

I'm asking the question, how can the government of Biden and Kamala Harris say to women get prenatal care? Okay, I got to get prenatal care? Well, is abortion prenatal care?

Speaker 8

But what is not?

Speaker 3

And so what is that thing with a heartbeat? Is that thing a growth? Is it a tumor? It's a baby?

Speaker 4

Right?

Speaker 3

And I'm willing to bet you a dollar to a donut mark that you were once an unborn baby? Am I right or wrong?

Speaker 2

Yes, you're right. A're absolutely correct me too, Yes, sir.

Speaker 3

And every woman listening. If you got to get pre natal care, what is the pre natal care for? It's the birth of a baby that is healthy. Abortion doesn't exactly do that. I don't think, no, it does not.

Speaker 7

That's a great answer. I appreciate you putting that out there. Thank you so much. You're a great American, mister cunning him.

Speaker 3

You are God bless America. Let's continue with more. Go to Paul and Idaho. I like to get a call from Montana. I'm really upset that Yellowstone and John Dutton is John Dutton. I guess is not going to return, and that Yellowstone is going to start with Rip and Beth sometime in November. I love that. I want to get a call from Montana, Paul and Idaho. You're close to Montana. That's good for me. Please go ahead you Thank you.

Speaker 9

I don't care if you I don't care if you chose that Moniker or not.

Speaker 3

Thank you. But I all I do is talk. And I often tell those who want to give me an award another Marconi or something or another. And you know what I tell him is, now, look give it to someone else. All I do is talk. And if I can persuade a few Americans to my side of the political side of things, morally and otherwise, that's my reward. And it's not some some other, some other monument or some other statue or whatever it might be. I I'm happy.

I'm happy with a million listeners on Sunday night, Paul, let me ask you a question. Let me ask you a question.

Speaker 2

Sure, Sure?

Speaker 3

Have you ever met Donald Trump in person?

Speaker 8

No?

Speaker 10

I haven't.

Speaker 3

If you met him, you'd love the guy. He's wonderful. Yeah, we had a golf game setup. It didn't happen. But but nonetheless, I've met him. I've spoken to him several times. I love the guy. Everyone that meets Donald Trump, including Elton John. Wait a minute, I'm gonna put you. I'm gonna come back to you. Stay right there, Paul Danny Gleason, you have the cut of Elton John. Yeah, that ready to go. Tell me about a minute. This is Elton John recently talking about Donald Trump. Hit it.

Speaker 11

I know that you're not a supporter of Donald Trump's. He loves your music. How did it feel when he took the lyrics to rocket Man and he used it as a nickname for Kim Jong un, and then he gave Kim Jong I laugh, was brilliant.

Speaker 12

I just thought, good on your Donald, I'm the rocket Man. Yeah. Donald's always been a fan of mine and he's been to my conscious many many times. So I mean, I've always been friendly towards him, and I thank him for his support.

Speaker 2

Yeah.

Speaker 12

When he did that, I just thought it was hilarious.

Speaker 11

It was maybe laugh he gave he gave Kim one of your CDs and signed it. That was that was one of the books about him because Kim, I guess, didn't know the song so well.

Speaker 13

So he gave Kim john Ung the sign cd Y you know which, Yeah, he heard of it. I know, because he hasn't heard of he can do it. Maybe you're very surprised if you had. I've never toured in North Korea and I have no intention of doing so. But it was I thought it was a light moment and it was fun.

Speaker 3

All I can say is he humanizing Donald Trump is going to put him in serious difficulties with a Hollywood left and others who want to destroy the guy based upon the new window. So, Paul, yeah, when you brought that up, I thought, Okay, let's hear from Elton john and Dwayne Johnson. The Rock has said very nice things about him and so, but the media wants to dehumanize Donald Trump instead of making him a human being. He's a wonderful person whose policies I agree with.

Speaker 9

Go ahead, Paul, just for a moment, go ahead, yeah, yeah. I wanted to mention about what's coming near here in your heart, the Israeli a Moss war.

Speaker 3

Let me put you on hold. From put you on hold just for a moment. I got to come back to you because we're at a crossroads here with the clock. I got to run but every night when I go go to bed, I wear my Saint Christopher metal and I say a prayer of Saint Michael to help the people of Israel, because they are God's representative of the Middle East. And I pray to God that Israel never falls. Let's continue with more. Bill cunning and the Great American

with you every Sunday night. My call from Baltimore. Let me put a sharper point on Marxism and capitalism slash Americanism see Marxism is a government philosophy where all the power given to individuals come from government itself. So whether you can pray, whether you can speak hate speech, for example, in Britain has now been criminalized, the power to associate, the power to possess weapons, search and seizure, seventh eighth, nine tenth Amendment, powers of the States and government, etc.

So wash all those rights away. In the Bill of Rights, Constitution, the US Constitution Declaration of Independence say that our rights as human beings come from God, God Almighty, the Providence gives us human rights, and that the governments are created to protect the rights given to us by God. Not our rights do not come from government. That's Bernie Sanders

and Kamala Harris. But rather the rights come from God, according to the US Constitution, according to the Declaration of Independence, according to Bill of Rights, God gives each of us certain enumerated rights that among the rights, there's other rights. But among those rights are contained in the Bill of Rights, which go on about there's like fifteen to twenty rights that we have as persons that in a sense, the

person is larger than government. In America, capitalism Declaration of Inen Counsel where a constitutional republic were not a democracy. So in Marxism and in socialistic countries like Western Europe, there is no US. There is no constitution, so right from government and the rights given by government can be

taken away by government. In America, because of the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights First ten Amendments US Constitution, the rights we have as human beings are superior to government, and that government's role is to get rid of the obstacles put in our path so we can pursue enumerated rights given to us by God. The only country on earth that has that is this country, and I'm proud to be an American. Kamala Harris would take away many of those rights. She believes that rights

come from government. Government that gives rights can take God take those rights away, but government, the rights from God cannot be taken away by government. Can you smell when I'm cooking? All right, let's continue. Coming up next will be Scott Powell of Newsmax dot com to talk about the debate, The Great Debate on Tuesday, Bill cunning and the Great American with you every Sunday night.

Speaker 14

Willie brough you by Choice Hotels, Econo Lodge and Roadway in Hotels are serving up double points for over qualifying stays.

Speaker 1

Book at Choice.

Speaker 2

Hotels dot com.

Speaker 1

Now here's the man who's been recognized as radio's best, the recipient of not one but two prestigious Marconi Awards for his broadcast excellence, the one and only Bill Cunninghead.

Speaker 3

My Billy Cunningham, the Great American. Of course. There the Great Debate, and I mean the Great Debate is Tuesday night between Kamala Harrison Donald Trump. Of course, the Harris campaign is already downplaying the Vice President's performance ahead of the debate, claiming that Donald Trump's been through about six or seven of theses. Will be the first presidential debates she had won with Mike Pence, in which he frequently said I'm speaking now, I'm speaking now, playing the women card.

But a great thinker, a great philosopher in America today is Scott Powell. His writings often are on Newsmax and or townhall dot com. And Scott Powell, welcome again to the Bill Cunningham Show. Week or ten days ago. You wrote a great report about Labor Day and how important labor is today. But it is very important because so few Americans actually work. The top one percent actually pay about forty percent of the taxes. The top five percent pay eighty percent. And that's the truth. But the truth

doesn't fit the media narrative. But from the great Debate Tuesday night, what do you think looking at the polls New York Times many others believe it or not, has Trump either tied or up which means he's up five percentage points Because so many people I know, ay, people you know, Scott Powell, don't want to say I'm voting for Donald Trump. And I'm not necessarily voting for Donald Trump. I'm voting for his policies. And I tell, especially women and others, do you want to close down border Do

you like safe cities? Do you want to have law and order? Want to have protesters and rioters arrested? Most the answers are yes. But nonetheless, if you were giving advice to Donald Trump for the Great Debate, if you could whisper in his heir or one of his sons, what would you say, if anything?

Speaker 8

Scott Powell, Well, I would counsel Donald Trump to be himself. He doesn't have to be too New Yorky. He just needs to be his respectful self and remind, remind the audience that Kamala Harris is the most far left radical candidate in the history of presidential elections, and she is not even in her position in any sort of democratic way. Not a single Democrat primary vote was cast across the

country to put her in place. I mean, they violated the rules of their party in our tradition of democracy, and there's nothing really more undemocratic than anointing someone without allowing the people the right to vote. But that's precisely what they did.

Speaker 2

Well well.

Speaker 3

One of the shocking things that one of the morning talk shows, Senator Bernie Sanders said this morning that, of course Kamala Harris has not changed one bit. She has to act as if she's one way, then get the other way because she wants voters. But she's still a very progressive person. And I'm thinking he just said that Kamala Harris's campaign is full of tom foolery and trickery to the extent that this is Senator Burney said has said one of the morning talk shows for Kristen Welker.

You know what, she hasn't changed one bit, but she has to change what she says in order to get votes. Why wouldn't that receive We have a whole bunch more play.

Speaker 8

Oh, I think it will. I think it will. You know, I think voters deserve to know what she stands for and what she wants to do. And do you know that Trump helped advance that cause because in the early days,

you know, nobody really knew what she believed. So Trump established a website called Kamala twenty twenty four policies dot com, and it listed Harris's priorities and positions and her heir plans include fighting to set murderers free, more bidnomics, claiming that it's working even though there are a rising costs, and oh, there's no nothing to worry about there more taxes to ensure middle class pays their fair share, the continuation of open borders, bringing back the Green New Deal,

ending wrongheaded thinking that more police means safer community. She's still basically at war and a promoter of defunding the police. She wants to eliminate private health insurance. She wants to give Social Security and Mendicare to illegal alien She's on record advocating and supporting that. It's incredible and also Kamala Harris own the weakness's failure and chaos of the Harris Biden administration. She is so radical that she makes the

Squad look moderate. I mean abolishing our borders, letting criminals control our streets, surrendering our communities to cartels in a plague of fentanyl, waging war on American energy, and destroying the American dream. That's who Kamala Harris is. And I think Trump will have no difficulty in educating the American people.

Speaker 3

It's really unbelievable. When on Amy's NBC News, Senator Bernie Sanders said, of course she has to say certain things get elected, but that's not who she is, and so I can't imagine a worse situation in which we have a prominent United States Senator, a fellow traveler of a Kamala Harris who simply stating publicly in NBC News she's no different now than she was three years ago. She's the same person, but she has the mouth certain pieties to get votes. I watched that, I said, are you

kidding me? And since then there's been a little other media coverage. But here's a big question for you, Scott Powell. Does it get out? Because it used to be you had three broadcast channels, you had a couple of big city newspapers, and now media has completely changed on its head. Will it get out? Because one other fact I want to share with you in the American people, seventy percent of American voters don't know exactly who Kamala Harris is.

They have the billionaires have given the money. They spent a billion dollars describing her different than what she truly is. And she kept such a low profile as vice president that a year ago the Democratic Party wanted to get rid of her as the Democratic nominee as vi vice president, but she was so unpopular. So you spend a billion dollars on her and keep from the American people the truth.

And then you got a US senator saying, well, basically, Jesus saying these things, acting as if she's moderate when she isn't to get votes. Isn't that something?

Speaker 15

It really is?

Speaker 8

It really is amazing that Bernie Sanders would would would undermine her that way. But you know, the Democrat Party is self destructing. I mean it's when people say, you know, they don't they feel like God, where is God in America today? And in dealing with all this, well, I think he is dealing with it. And you know, even the Republicans couldn't the Republican strategists couldn't figure out a better way for the Democrat Party to self destruct. They're

doing it to themselves. I mean, whether it's choosing bad candidates or you know, it's it's there, you know, their deceit there, they're lying, they're just brazen liars about things. It's incredible. And you know, you remember that Kamala proudly delivered the deciding vote that allowed the one point nine trillion stimulus to be passed, and that is really what really pushed inflation into our economy in a very significant way. So she is the inflation president, And you and.

Speaker 3

Biden the other day say well, the reason we passed the Inflation and Reduction Act. This is Biden saying this. It wasn't the Inflation Reduction Act, it was about green energy. And so now they're admitting that the title of the action spending about two chearlion dollars was a lie in fact that it compelled inflation to go a lot higher. And the President is saying, well, it wasn't about inflation. It was about green energy, which the American people don't support. I found out unbelievable.

Speaker 2

To I know.

Speaker 8

I know, well, if American people only understood what getting to a zero CO two emissions would cost America, they would be they'd be blown away. There have been some economists that have run the numbers, and to get to a zero CO two an all sustainable energy system and wind and solar primarily, it would cost two hundred and ninety trillion dollars for us to get there. And meanwhile, we have black gold everywhere under America. I mean, it's

amazing how much hydrocarbons. I don't call it fossil fuels, I call them hydrocarbons. And this is the energy on demand. You fill your tank, you can go. You don't have to plug in your car. And to say nothing of the horrible defacement of the earth that comes from lithium mining which the Chinese control, and the slave labor in the Congo to produce the cobalt where they have child labor that basically is instrumental in bringing cobalt which is

used in these batteries. So there's nobody ever talks about the downside to this but America. You know, I'm an economist, and there's something called comparative advantage, and that basically says that every nation should do what they're best at. You know, if they are good at something, or they're plentiful of the resource, they should focus on producing that. Well, guess what we should do. We should be producing oil and gas like the you know, like never before, because we

have so much of it. I'm watching the other and we're finding new deposits all the time. It's amazing.

Speaker 3

I'm one of those odd guys to go to YouTube to watch videos happen things I miss on CPAN. I love c SPAN. I love with Senator John Kennedy and Louisiana does to liberals and the numbers anywhere between one fifteen three hundred trillion dollars to be carbon neutral in America. And then the question is asked, well, if we do that, let's say we spend three hundred trillion dollars over the next ten to fifteen years, which money we have to

three We don't have that kind of money. And the question was asked, well, what if China and Pakistan and India and Russia doesn't go along with this? And the answer from the so called green experts is well, that would be a problem. So we can spend ourselves into bankruptcy and go back to medieval days and we would have no benefit on the world so called climate at all goes the rest of the world won't pay attention

to us. And then this woman also went over to look at these lithium minds, the cobalt mines in Africa, in which hundreds of children's kids are killed every year, and there's tens of thousands in chattel slavery digging in the dirt, under dark in these minds with no safety regulations at all, and the damage caused to the environment by that is completely ignored by the liberal left in this country. To say nothing of getting rid of all the solar panels once they're used, all made in communists

read China, what to do with them? To say nothing of the so called batteries, the evs. There are millions and millions of tons of these batteries that are going to be in the soil for another one hundred thousand years. Nothing to do about that. This is a joke. It is an absolute general.

Speaker 8

Kamala Harris is, yeah, Bill, you're so right, you're you are extraordinarily knowledgeable about this. I've watched it, Bill.

Speaker 3

I've watched it. And these are liberals, Scott Powell, liberals ten years ago said we have to do that. Well they did it, and now we're into it, and there's thousands of kids being killed, chattel slaves. The environment is being ruined. There's no way of getting rid of the EV deplet the batteries, and also the solar panels. We have no mechanism get rid of those. And they're pushing more and more, guaranteeing no results, no results, and.

Speaker 2

We're still act.

Speaker 8

And we are, we are making ourselves haunted the further we go down this road of sustainable energy with solar, you know, solar panels, in particular the soul or part of it. The more and the ev the de Lusian batteries. The more we are a hostage to China, the more China can control us because they supply it. They could threaten to cut it off. And then where are we.

Speaker 3

Well or sol the other thing, This is a sideline. I'm watched this other report about where do our pharmaceuticals come from? Our pharmaceuticals ninety percent come from communist red China. We don't make them here anymore, and God knows what's in some of the pharmaceuticals. We're acting as if we can continue on this path for the next and if Kamala Harris's win's God powered for the next say eight years

in office. Let's say she wins the Great Debate. The media made Claire She's the winner anyway, But nonetheless, imagine America in eight more years down this path, what do we look like?

Speaker 8

It's over. It's over for us. I mean, Kamala Harris is calling for wealth redistribution and the reshaping of American history through a revolutionary lens that really resembles Marxist Communist Manifesto, which is a progressive manifest though that called for the abolition of existing property relations, centralization of credit and communication, and state controlled redistription and resources. You know, she talks about equitable treatment, Well, what does that mean? What does

it mean equitable? It means we all end up at the same place. And she said as much. That is a communist type society. That's who she is. Americans need to wake up and just vote the other way. I mean, if you don't like Donald Trump, get over it.

Speaker 3

Look at his part now. Lastly, Mark Zuckerberg sent a long report to Congress about a week or ten days ago, in which he admitted at Facebook and other social media sites that the federal government use its power over social media to interfere in the twenty twenty election to make

sure that Donald Trump didn't win. That officials of the DOJ and the FBI encouraged and bullied Facebook and other social media companies not to report on the true effects of COVID and the vaccine, and also, most importantly, the Hunter Biden laptop in which the FBI had that in December of twenty nineteen. They knew it was real, and so the regulators of social media, that is, the federal government bullied private social media companies to lie about Donald

Trump and not to report the truth. Is that election interference by the Democrats.

Speaker 8

It most certainly is. It is the highest level of election interference. And I think that's why we need a guy like Donald Trump in office, because he's really the only kind of guy with the determination, the courage, the sort of you know, he's really a righteous man and he's got I think, what it takes to correct much

of this. And of course he'll have a lot of people around him he's not going to have He's going to be very selective of the people that he has around him because he was largely undercut by bad staffing in his last administration. I think we're going to have a very powerful administration with Donald Trump, and I think, you know, it'll it'll set the stage for you know, for probably Vans to carry out I hope in the

next four years, because this is a long haul. This We're not going to get all this corrected overnight.

Speaker 3

Long and I'm thinking, Okay, electing Donald Trump will stop what's occurring at a minimum and send America on a new direction at the other end of the spectrum. So if we have twelve years of Donald Trump, leaving four years from now. Jd Vance, who attends the same church that I attend, a little sense of the live.

Speaker 2

Yeah.

Speaker 3

Jd Vance converted to Catholicism about five years ago. And if J. D Vance can continue the Trump policies and we have twelve years of Trump and then Vance for eight years, America is different, America is better. We'll give to our kids and grandkids a better country than the course we're on. When the federal government can bully private companies to infer and wrongfully influence the outcome of election, then benefited when DOJ officials were hired by Facebook as

attorneys after they left the FBI and the DOJ. Think about how dirty that is. And that's where we are right now. Well, we've got to run. Scott Powell. I wanted to get on Labor Day ten days ago and other stuff, but we'll do that another time. Other holidays are Scott Powell, You're the best. Check them out Newsmax and also town Hall dot com. Scott Powell, you're a great American. Thanks for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show. Scott, Thank you very.

Speaker 8

Much, and thank you for all you do.

Speaker 2

Bill.

Speaker 10

Keep it up.

Speaker 3

God bless you. Le's continue with more. I'm not voting for Donald Trump. I'm voting for all of his policies.

Speaker 2

Now.

Speaker 3

I know the guy personally. I find him extremely, extremely friendly and attractive. I've spoken to him on the phone a few times. I like the guy. But even if you don't like the guy, even if you think something's wrong with him, his policies work. Let's continue with more. Bill Cunning and the Great American with you every Sunday, Guy fully Cunning him the Great American's got pal and I are exactly right. How many times have you thought

to yourself, I have a good friend. I don't know about you, but I have a lot of good friends, a lot of golfing buddy go pals. I have a lot of friends who are judges, a lot of judge a lot. I have friends that are garbage men. I have friends that are radio producers. And I have a lot of friends. And if I had a friend of mine who was a great guy, great on the golf course, we'll play a dollar little bingo bongo banngo six point game named after Bruce Roddy, my good friend who passed

away about two years ago. And this guy was a wonderful person, but he was a liberal. What I vote for him, absolutely not. On the other end, if I had a terrible, terrible friend, I wouldn't have terrible friends, by the way, but the guy was terrible. But on the other hand, his policies were correct. What I vote for that person the conservative absolutely. So it's not about a personal who's going to be your best friend, who's going to be at your best spouse. It's about who

can be the best person to lead this country. And it's certainly not Kamala Harris with the lies she's telling. According to Senator Bernie Sanders, let's continue with more. Craig Yui's next, Bill Cunningham, the Great American with you and all great Americans, of course, of course every Sunday night, Billy cunning in the Great America. Of course, the election now is but eight or nine weeks away. We're close. The election is hot and heavy, the great debates coming up,

and we'll see what happens on September the tenth. But as I've said before, law fair is a principal employed by the Democratic Party because when you want to manit late election results and you want to accuse the other side, of ruining democracy, a threat to democracy. You're the ones engaging in the threat to democracy, so accuse the other side of engaging in your behavior, which is a wonderful

thing to do if you're a Democrat. And Craig Yuey, who's written many books, but he's got a blog posting under the radar twenty twenty four election alert and the amount of money is being raised as we speak to contest the election by Democrats is unbridled. And Craig Huey, welcome again to the Bill Cunningham Show. And first of all, can you tell the American people what is lawfair and

why is it weakening election integrity? Which is the opposite of what the Democrats intend at which they discussed, but of course it's a real thing. Explain the rise of lawfare and what it means to the American people.

Speaker 2

Well, Bill, you know, people may have heard this term, but it really is huge.

Speaker 16

It deals with election integrity, It deals with interfering with the election itself. And right now we're in a time of this loft that if people have an idea, they can't think of that temp Remember the attempt to try to have Trump remove bus from the ballot. There were lawsuits in the states were they were trying to take him off the ballot.

Speaker 2

They wouldn't let him even be on the ballot. Well, that's using the legal system to.

Speaker 16

Be able to be weaponized against the political opponent. And that's exactly what's going on now. It's under the radar, it's you don't see what's happening. But right now, Kamala Harris has hired a super attorney named Mark Elias. Right now, Mark Elias, we could cover him if you want, but he basically is in charged the lawfare of the Harris campaign. He's worked as the architect back when they started this in twenty eighteen, twenty twenty two and twenty four. And

here's the thing. He has hundreds of staff lawyers, yes, he has over a thousand lawyers as volunteers, one thousand, and they're following lawsuits in the swing states to change the election and.

Speaker 3

It got going back in time. Mark Elias is the one who was involved with Perkins Koe that was involved in the twenty sixteen campaign, the Russian collusion delusion that of course was a lie, and then that was also employing social media, which has come out recently with Mark Zuckerberg saying that he was wrong and listening to what he was told about the Russian collusion delusion. He was wrong about the Hunter Biden laptop, he was wrong about

suppressing information about COVID and the vaccine. So that these lawyers there are literally hundreds, and you make a point that something in the range of one point seven billion dollars was donated to Democratic campaigns, et cetera. And Mark Elias has the lawyers like a spring ready to be sprung should Trump win state, here comes the pest of lawyers. And god knows, I'm one and I love lawyers, but here they come in mass to make sure that the law fairers used in set of voter integrity, and the

opposite is what the Democrats include. And so when it comes to just who gets on the ballot, you pointed out the state of Colorado and the state of Maine are two states dominated on the Supreme Court by the Democrats. They wanted to keep number one Trump can't even be on the ballot, and number two RFK Junior and other Democrats have been kept from the ballots in many states in the primary. Explain how that process worked.

Speaker 2

So Bill here's the thing. They're prepared for the elections. Just like you stated, there's going.

Speaker 16

To be lawsuit, are for lawsuit. But they've been working behind the scenes. Now right now you mentioned RFK. They were fighting, the Democrat Party was fighting state after state not to have him be on the ballot because they were afraid he.

Speaker 2

Was hurt Harris And.

Speaker 16

It was incredibly wrong, incredibly expensive and in some states incredibly successful in keeping RFK Junior off the ballot.

Speaker 2

Now he is endorsed Frump.

Speaker 16

He said he's going to he is so mad at the Democratic Party of the dirty tricks they used against them, of the lives and the manipulation and the censorship, that he was going to take his name off the ballot only in the states that are the swing states, the swing states that will determine the upcoming election. And so what basically has happened is that the Democrats under Mark Elias and this law fair, what they have done is now they're fighting to keep RFK jor.

Speaker 2

On the ball.

Speaker 16

On the ballot and the Michigan Yeah, they've won in Michigan, they won in North Carolina and uh and it looks like they're going to win at least one, if not two other states. And of course now that he has endorsed Trump and if he's on the state and in Michigan. In Michigan, uh, you know, you're talking about two percent of the people who could vote with swing to Trump if if he wasn't on the bout otherwise they're going to vote.

Speaker 2

For RFK Junior. Right.

Speaker 16

Well, that two percent is all the difference in the world between Trump winning Michigan and none. And that's why they're so spending so much money and time in these lawsuits. So they're they're doing lawsuits, hundreds of lawsuits, local county, state to help the Democrats. They have major victories in Arizona, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Michigan, and they're shooting to push mill in ballots, ballot harvesting, stopping voter id Looking at every pool watcher, it is insane.

Speaker 3

Craig Uey, when you think about the party complaining about election integrity, the Democratic Party, about Trump being a threat to democracy. Every voter's got account. They spent millions and millions of dollars with hundreds of lawyers to fashion the Democratic ballot to make sure that Joe Biden was the nominee, and once his mental frail to became public, they then quickly substituted And so the party about calling Trump a

threat to democracy. They're the threat to democracy. And now having spent months and months keeping Kennedy off the ballot, they're now spending millions and millions of dollars in front of friendly democratic courts in these states to keep them on the ballot. So one point, keep them off, Now keep them on. It's not about voter integrity. It's not about honoring what the voters want in the Democrat I'm or come November the fifth, It's about electing a certain person.

And you have something in your blog that talks about the sixty five project dismandling conservative legal talent. Radical lawyers are having a tough time against Republican conservative lawyers, so they're trying to dispar them and silence them. Explain that aspect of the democratic legal machine to disbar conservative attorneys.

Speaker 16

They have taken attorneys that are conservatives, like John Eastman, disbarred him. They have put fear in the lives of conservative and libertarian attorneys that they better not get involved in politics. And it's a way to suppress people standing up or in the legal profession to help conservatives, Libertarians, Christians, Republicans. They know that this group will target them for being disbarred.

Speaker 2

This is dirty and nasty.

Speaker 16

So it comes fact of this you have mentioned about judges, and the said, let me just tell you this election, everybody who should be outraged by this, this travesty of justice. They need to vote for a Secretary of State that won't put up for it. If they vote for register of voters, they need to make sure who that person is.

Speaker 2

Judges.

Speaker 16

You know, they need to use judge voter guide dot com or a site that tells them who's the judicial activist and who's the strict constructionists and know how to make sure because as this goes to the judges, if they're a radical liberal judicial activist legislating from the bench, they're going to vote in favor a Mark Elias and his legal team. If they're a strict constructionist, if they're a conservative judge.

Speaker 2

They're not going to take nonsense.

Speaker 16

They're going to look at the Constitution, they're going to look at the law, and they are not going.

Speaker 2

To vote beast upon their own opinion.

Speaker 3

This is another important matter that it appears, whether it's Alexa today. If you speak to your Alexis speaker and you say tell me about Donald Trump, and nothing comes out. If you tell me tell me about Kamala Harris, you

got a long die tribe. How great she is. Big Tech has now confessed to the idea that government attorneys at the FBI and the DOJ intimidated Mark Zuckerberg and others into not supplying to the American people truthful information about the Hunter Bider laptop and and about the COVID. And they now concede that that government employees manipulated the outcome of the twenty twenty election to help Joe Biden and hurt Donald Trump. Now, isn't that a little bit

about election interference? At least a lot more than Donald Trump not putting on a form payment to a porn star for which he was convicted of thirty four counts. In this case. From Mark Zuckerberg about a week or ten days ago, he admitted the election interference came from the government attorneys coercing and bullying social media companies to not put out negative information about Joe Biden and all

negative information about Donald Trump. Isn't not more election interference than payments to a porn star.

Speaker 16

Oh my gosh, Bill, it is total injustice.

Speaker 2

It's not right.

Speaker 16

Yes, these attorneys they get their training ground with the Department of Justice, and then they go out into the private sector. They go out into the political world and the wreck havoc. And for those who are in government. One of the things that started under Obama and then just went on steroids under Biden was using these lawyers to put pressure on big tech to censor, to be able to silence opposition, to silence issues that was embarrassment

or they didn't want to have brought up. And so we you know, it's a collusion between government and the private sector.

Speaker 2

And that's where.

Speaker 16

Really it is not right. It should not happen. It's a danger to our republic. It's a danger to the elections. And all this is election interference. If you go on Google right now and you triped in Trump's position on Israel, every article that comes up on the first page, which eighty nine percent of the people will never go below

page one, is anti Trump. You do that with Harris on Israel, and everything is a positive from the liberal press like New York Times and MSNBC and the Washington Post, and you can not find conservative commentary unless you go down ten, fifteen to twenty pages, and even then it's very sparse.

Speaker 2

It's censored.

Speaker 16

They have set up an algorithm to basically censor alternative points of view, and so this affects the persuadables, This affects the low information of voter, This affects those people who aren't listening to your program. It is a danger to a free, open, and fear line.

Speaker 3

And this election interference is conducted by government employees on government time, using their law to be ready to intimidate tech companies that they're under the duty to regulate. And there have been numerous examples of the FBI top echelon and doj echelon leaving their jobs then going to work for big tech with big stock options. And to me, that is election interference, but it is not well reported.

Speaker 8

No.

Speaker 3

Lastly, philanthropic consultancy supplying dark money, you have this on your blog, receive one point seven billion dollars in twenty twenty alone. Mark Elias heads the largest law firm focused on representing the Democratic Party. Elias was crucial to the party's legal strategy during the twenty twenty election, and he built democratic organizations. His fee was twenty seven million dollars in order to work. And I've seen him on MSNBC and I watched that channel, so you don't have to.

And he's repeatedly on MSNBC talking about the lawsuits ready to be sprung on the Trump administration. They have a hundreds of lawyers. If Trump is elected, beginning on January twentieth, the file mountains of injunctions against whatever Trump wants to do. Let's hope the greatness occurs and Trump takes office again

in January of next year. What are they prepared to do to stop the Trump agenda at that point, and on top of the election and interference already going on, if we see through to know what's going on, how would they stop the Trump administration?

Speaker 16

They basically have a plan to do everything they can legally to stop Trump from becoming president. And if he wins the election, and they will challenge the votes, they will challenge the procedures, they will challenge the Electoral College votes.

Speaker 2

They will do everything they can.

Speaker 16

And if he does become president, what happened in twenty sixteen in twenty twenty was the deep state.

Speaker 2

Resistance.

Speaker 16

That resistance destroyed any policies that Trump tried to initiate.

Speaker 2

Everything was leaked to the press.

Speaker 16

The bureau ideologically driven bureau pass refuse to carry out orders from.

Speaker 2

The Trump administration. Right now, what's going to happen.

Speaker 16

Is that the lawsues will be one hundred times more on anything in all things Trump does to try to drain the swamp, to try to make significant changes away from our road to socialism.

Speaker 3

The party that worries about threats to democracy and election inference are conducting exactly that behavior. Craig Uey. The blog article is under the radar twenty twenty four election Alert. Craig Uey, once again, you're a great American. Let's keep informing the American people and I hope the majority figure it out. But once again, thank you for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show. Craig Huey, thank you very much.

Speaker 2

Thanks Bill.

Speaker 3

Let's continue. There's the truth. The party that complains about threats to the democracy are the threat, and the party that complains about election interference are engaging in interference in the election. Can you smell when I'm cooking? Bill cunning in The Great American Live with You every Sunday night, Billy cunning into the Great America, and I'm glad Craig

Juley was here with you and I tonight. He laid out a five hundred million to one billion of funds ready to legally attack Donald Trump, not just between now and the election, but if happens to win, that's when the real problems start. There's hundreds of lawsuits to be filed. They're going to determine whether or not votes are properly cast, and the liberal lawyers are ready to go. Hundreds of liberal lawyers all over the country, and they're going to

institutionalize this. So they're going to try to keep him from being elected, and if he's elected, they're going to keep him from being inaugurated. And if he's inaugurated, they're going to try to keep him from serving the country. That's the way they operate. Mark Elias and others, a lawyer on the left who's very good at what he does from a liberal perspective, has organized an effort against Donald Trump laid out by Craig youugh, you just ard,

which is totally unpresident and totally unbelievable. What's going to happen in this country? Because the Democratic Party will deny the outcome of the election completely, and then they won't accept the inaugural. The riots, the protest will commence and it won't stop.

Speaker 2

That.

Speaker 3

That'll be a good mess to be and imagine the alternative. The alternative would be, of course, that Kamala Harris as the next president and she implements the policies of Senator Bernie Sanders this morning on Meet the Press said that of course she's a liberal. Of course she's a progressive. She's not changed at all, but she has to say certain things to get elected. Now, you would have thought

that was a big story. I watched today a lot of the news, all the NFL football going on, wasn't a big story at all, Sir Bernie Sanders, a fellow traveler with AOC and Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi said this morning, she's not changed. One bet. She has to lie to you to get your vote. Is that a big deal? Well, it should be a big deal, but not with Democrats. Let's continue with more. Next up, as Lee Williams is

reatten a column on what happened in Afghanistan. The last person in the Oval office was Kamala Harris, and she supports what happened in Afghanistan. Bill Cunningham with you, every Sun.

Speaker 14

Inn, Willie Brock You by Choice Hotels, a counter Lodge and roadway in hotels are serving up double points for every qualifying stay book at Choice Hotels dot com.

Speaker 1

Now here's the man who's been recognized as radio's best, the recipient of not one but two prestigious Marconi Awards for his broadcast Exodens, the one and only Bill Cunningham.

Speaker 3

Cunningham, the great American. Of course, what happened in Arlington several days ago with the Gold Star Families at Abbey Gates, Some thirteen proud Americans heroes were killed I say murdered by many by terrorists and others because of the poor decision of Joe Biden to withdraw from the Afghanistan and the way that he did. Joining you and nine now is Lee Williams, who's a spokesman for the Second Amendment Foundation.

And Lee Williams, welcome to the Bill Cunningham Show. And first of all, this happened a little over three years ago. Can you talk about, first for those who may be somewhat uninitiated, what happens at Abbey's Gate with those thirteen American heroes. Give us the facts.

Speaker 15

First, well, thirteen were killed, untold number were wounded horribly wounded, and a large number of Afghans were wounded and killed. Also when a suicide bomber bust in. The whole thing can be blamed on Joe Biden's abrupt and ill conceived pullout of Afghanistan. It was just cut and run. He left behind enough weaponry to arm a small country, well,

which he basically did. I mean, we're talking about one hundred and seventy six artillery pieces, more than sixty four thousand belt fed machine guns, one hundred and twenty six thousand handguns, and then of course three hundred and fifty eight thousand, five hundred and thirty select fire real assault weapons, which he accuses us abouting us being law abiding gun owners. A lot of these rifles had high end optics. Many hadr infrared lasers, which aren't much good unless you have

night vision gear. But Joe Biden very conveniently left behind more than sixteen thousand sets of NBG, so basically the Taliban had the capability of fighting at night, which until his pullout was pretty much just our province.

Speaker 3

One might ask why because I watched the testimony of Chairman of the Joint Steve's Mark Milly, and I watch Austin Lloyd Lloyd Austin testified Secretary of Defense, and they both said we recommend it against a pullout in this way. And the excuse by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris has been well, this was started by Donald Trump. This was Donald Trump's pullout. Why is that a lie?

Speaker 15

It's bunk. Biden is the one that pardoned my my pud, pulled the trigger on this whole mess. The way the way Trump had it worked out is we would have we would have gone into the air base there at and taking control of that and had pulled out the military last. I mean he had it, he had it well planned out. Wasn't a big deal. We would have collapsed onto Banger Airfield and it would have been much better, a much better tactical decision than what Biden did.

Speaker 3

And when you talk about what was purposely left behind against the advice of the military, some of the most shocking things eighty billion dollars a weaponry that the Taliban used a few days ago, a week or two ago

to celebrate. From their perspective, they used American military hardware to celebrate the fact that they kicked out the American soldier, sixty five thousand belt fed machine guns, one hundred and twenty six thousand handguns, and three hundred and fifty eight thousand select fire assault weapons, real assault weapons that are now being used by the Taliban against their own people. Plus I've read online that Isis has once again a

foothold in Afghanistan. On top of all that, and still and still, Joe Biden doesn't talk about it, or is Kamala Harris, And she says she was the last person in the room that the decision was made. She agreed with it one thousand percent. That we I think most Americans lee said, we got to get out of Afghanistan. It's the way that we got out that reminded me of getting out of Vietnam when the last American helicopters

were throwing people out the side to leave. That's the amazing part is that somehow we left Afghanistan in a way that bold in the past the Taliban to do more. And can you discuss at all, talib what the Taliban held Afghanistan, Well, what the people look like today and the government looks like in Afghanistan because of Kamala Harris.

Speaker 15

Oh, it's terrible. I mean, it's absolutely terrible. And don't forget during the Vietnam War, at least we had a better and well planned draw down of horses compared to what we have here. Yeah, I mean, if an Afghan woman appear today, right now, if it's illegal for an Afghan woman to appear outside of her home unless she's fully veiled, and not only that, but women in public are prohibited from talking. The AP reported that a woman's

voice is deemed intimate and should be heard. Should not be heard singing or reciting or reading aloud in public. There are no women's rights over there. You know, women are not going to school, children, girls are not going to school. I mean they've they've yet to comment about the whoores that these Afghan women are facing. But you know, from a to bring it home for me and for Americans, we're facing a crisis here based on all the terrorists

that have come across the southern border. FBI just admitted the ICE released a known Afghan terrorists. They allowed him to post a twelve thousand dollars bond and disappear. Meanwhile, we've got the Department of Homeland Security has identified four hundred terrorists that have come across our southern border, and they don't know the whereabouts of fifty of them. And you know, look what Tim Scott said during the Republican National Convention. He said, there are sleeper cells in this

country right now. And none of these cats are mentioning the more than fifty thousand military age males from communists China, which would constitute a division of sorts who've come across the border who we don't know where they are. Meanwhile, and none of this Kamala or Joe are addressing. All they're talking about is how they want to quote ban assault weapons. Unbelievable. I mean, look at the events in the Ukraine when the Red Army motorized rifle divisions throwm

across their border. The Ukraine's were ripping open cases of aks and handing them out as fas as they could. Look at what happened in Israel, those horrible ten to seven the massacre we have seen that. You know, when these militaries attack civilian targets, it's horrific. And right now, all we have basically is you know, American forest of arms, and Joe wants to get rid of that, never mentioning the three hundred and fifty eight thousand select by our

rifles he gifted to an actual terrorist state. I mean, it's the height of hypocrisy. As I pointed out in my column, American arms have been a deterrent for invasion. We saw that during World War Two, and we may soon need them to defend our homeland from actual terrorists. And yet you want to take them away. Doesn't make any sense.

Speaker 3

Lee Wall. It is one of the sickest things Joe Biden does as the ends most public speeches by saying, may God protect our troops, because and I look at when he had the opportunity to protect our troops at abby Gate thirteen service personnel, he had the opportunity to protect them, he did not protect them. In fact, Joe

Biden's policies armed the Taliban and indirectly ISIS. And over the last twenty some years in Afghanistan, beginning I guess in November December of twenty oh one, we were there for what twenty twenty one years, and we left in a way that Afghan people in a worse condition. There have been thousands and thousands of Afghani's working with us while we were there who have been tortured and killed

with the weapons of America left behind. So Joe Biden armed the terrorist with one hundred and twenty six thousand handguns, sixty five thousand belt fed machine guns, other artillery pieces, and night vision equipment that they didn't have before. So instead of just leaving it in a neutral condition, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris left behind enough weaponry the Armored Division in Afghanistan. And they don't talk about it much today, do they.

Speaker 2

No, they don't.

Speaker 15

And what scares me. You know, Joe Biden has, without adept been the most anti gun president we've ever seen in this manastry of this country. He issued forty anti gun executive orders. Kamala would probably issue forty on her first day. She is light years beyond Joe Biden in

terms of being anti gun. The White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention, which by the way, is in the White House being paid for by your taxpayer dollars, in mind, she runs that, so she sharpened her anti gun skills and she is out there like Joe Biden has never thought of being in terms of anti gun. We've made some major predictions she has about what would happen if she gets elected. We have said that she wants raars. She's called for a mandatory buyback, which is a joke.

Government can't buy back anything it never owned in the first place, and that would violate so we're talking confiscation, which would violate the second amend of the fourth the fifth Amendment, the fourteenth Amendment. I mean, she's crazy at that gun compared to Joe.

Speaker 3

In fact, she has said in California, and I think most of the American people do not understand her political positions. They look at a gender, look at her race, they vote for her. Many people are angry with Donald Trump for on reason or another. They're not going to vote for him, but they don't know what she has said in the past that she would do if she was elected.

They're ignorant of Kamala Harris's viewpoints. And she keeps lying to us again because she wakes up every day thinking, you know what, if the American people knew what I'm gonna do, I couldn't get elected. So let's lie to them to get elected. Then I'll go back to my position. But she also says things such as reparations for African Americans. She says things like get rid of private insurance companies

on gun buybacks. The question was asking her her, well, if people don't want to sell them, what do you do? She said, we'll take the guns. She actually has said the knock on doors with law enforcement to take guns away from the American people. And most Americans are ignorant of what she's wants to do, what her positions have been, because it done fits the media narrative. And just go back to the gold Star families at Arlington, they stand

four square with Donald Trump. Do you think the Harris attempt to attack Trump's Arlington visit has backfired on her or not or the media won't report it.

Speaker 15

The media is starting to report it, and it backfired tremendously. I've seen the videos that these gold Star families have made attacking her for attacking Trump, and it's difficult to watch them with the dry eye.

Speaker 2

It really is.

Speaker 15

And you know, you think back to the dignified transfer at Dover. I used to work in Dover as an investigative reporter at Delaware at a paper there and I've been to Dover Air Force Base and I still remember those caskets coming off that aircraft and Joe Biden looking at his watch like he had somewhere better to be as a doctor. I can never forget or forgive that. It's just amazing in a terrible way what he did.

So not only had he victimized them once, now he's victimized those gold Star families again, and he's never really met with them. I mean, he talked to him at Dover and all he could talk about was his son Bo. It's sad what these families have been put through, and this administration, the Biden Hear's administration, continues to victimize them.

Speaker 3

And it didn't have to happen if he followed the military advice. And the military has been wrong, especially Milli and Austin. They're not my favorite guys. Of course one's gone, the other still in power. But nonetheless, all they had to do was go back to Bogram Air Force Base and stay there and they have a slow teardown over a period of time, and those thirteen service members would be alive today and the families wouldn't have to suffer.

They didn't sign up for this every time he says, and God protect our troops, I would say, mister President, you had the duty to protect the thirteen service members at Abbey's Gate, and you failed to do so for political reasons. And Yamala Harris, you were in the room making the last arguments to do and she said she supported one, leaving behind eighty billion dollars in military equipment.

Whenever Joe Biden says in God protect our troops, you have a pit in your stomach saying why didn't you protect them at Abby's Gate?

Speaker 15

Yeah, and Camlo would be even worse. Quick, Frank, I mean, look who she chose as are running mate, A balor thief, a documented valor thief. I don't know one veteran. I know quite a few who supports Tim Waltz. I recently did a column on him. I talked to some gun owners in Minnesota, actually my home state. I now live in the Free State of Florida, thank God, and he had They just cannot believe that Waltz was chosen because

of his antipathy towards the Second Amendment. When he was in Congress, he was an a rated NRA endorsed congressman. But then when he ran for governor of Minnesota, he completely flipped anti done to the extreme. And if you know, we have said that Joe Biden has weaponized the ATF to support his war on guns. Kabbala and Tim they would criminalize the ATF that we look for a search mark my words, look for a surge of these unconstitutional knock and talks, these home invasions by ATF done under

the guys of what they call consensual encounters. I mean Tim Waltz ordered police in Minnesota to shoot anybody they saw outside during the lockdown of the pandemic with paintballs, and now he wants to be veep look at there. He will find a group of federal officers in the ATF who are more than willing to carry out his illegal orders. As the ATF has proven under Biden, this is going to be bad.

Speaker 3

Bill Lee Williams lastly, talk about the assault weapons ban. It's an article of faith among the leftists to have a quote and assault weapons ban. Can you explain to the American people why assault weapons are already banned and why that's a political canard?

Speaker 15

Yeah, we call it the Clinton gun ban in my circles, and it banned the most popular rifle in America, the AR fifteen, the Air fifteen. Of the at least the ones in my state are all semi automatic. They fired with one pull of the trigger. To be a true assault weapon, it has to be select fire basically meaning he has to be capable fully automatic fire. It has

to be a machine gun. You can own them as a civilian, although there's an incredible amount of hoops you have to jump through from the ATF and assuming you live in a pre state, But ninety nine point nine percent of the weapons out there are semi automatic ars. And the assault weapon ban, the Clinton gun ban did nothing after at sunset. It was studied by the DOJ, the RAND Corporation studied it to see its utility. It

didn't accomplish anything. And now they want to take them away at the very time when we need them, when our country's being infiltrated by terrorists from god knows where.

Speaker 3

And how many Chinese young male, unattached individuals Chinese males have under in America the past three years that we know about, what's the number, approximately.

Speaker 15

Fifty thousand, And you've got to realize you can't just leave communist China. You need the blessing of the Communist government. So why did the Communist government in chrying to greenlight the arrival of more than fifty thousand military age mailsmen makes you wonder?

Speaker 3

Doesn't make me wonder. They're working in pot farms illegally, they're involved in illegal activities. They're burglarizing homes along with venezuela and gangs all over the place. And we went through hell with COVID test and God help you in the military, some six thousand were bounced out of the service because they didn't want COVID vaccines. And these immigrants coming in, these illegal migrants, these fifty thousand Chinese, none

have COVID shots. We don't know their medical histories, don't know why they're here. It's absurd. And Kamala Harris has been in charge of that policy. And now she's saying build that wall. Now she's saying, drill, baby, drill. Do you believe any of it? Can Kamala Harris actually build that wall? Why didn't she do it?

Speaker 2

Now?

Speaker 15

Yeah, I have no I put no faith in no stocking anything she says.

Speaker 2

Now.

Speaker 15

I don't think even her staffers know where she stands on the issues. Quite Frankly, she's flip clopped so many times on everything from cracking to guns. Now she doesn't want to take away our weapons. Okay, yeah, of course we trust her down. That's never going to change right now.

Speaker 3

She wakes up every day trying to hide from the American people, which you truly believe she'll say and do anything to get elected, then return to her liberal San Francisco roots, which is Marxism. Once again, Lee Williams of the Second Amendment Foundation, thank you for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show. And I'll say, God bless the soldiers and abrogate that gave their lives for a failed American military policy that Joe Biden acted upon without military approval.

And once again, Lee Williams, thank you for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show. And Lee, you're a great American. Thank you, Thank you, sir. Let's continue. Goll Cunningham The Great American Live with you every Sunday Night by Billy Cunningham. Let's continue and never stop. We simply continue big debate on Tuesday. No matter what happens, the media will declare

that Kamala Harris won. In fact today on a lot of the Sunday morning talk shows, the campaign for Kamala Harris is putting out the fact that she's a decided underdog. She's never had a presidential debate before and Trump has had six of them, so really, and Trump's gonna shoot his mouth off, make a fool of himself, and the steady hand at the helm will be Kamala Harris. Accord.

According to the Harris campaign, which is of course a bunch of bs on policy, the last person in the room before the so called President Joe Biden overruled his own military leaders to withdraw from Afghanistan was Kamala Harris. And she supports that policy, she says completely. And it's the right the policy, she said. But talk to the gold Star families, the thirteen heroes who were killed slash murdered at Abbey's Gate, talk to them about whether that

was a successful policy. She claims it was, and by itself, that's almost like a disqualifier. All let's continue with more. Joseph Asquez is coming up. He's from the Media Research Center, Brent Prozell's group, and more. But just think about this debate Tuesday night. It'll be the biggest debate probably since Reagan and Carter teed it up near the end of the nineteen eighty election. It's going to be bigger than Montana, and god knows I love Montana. We'll see what happens,

but it may go a long way. All the polling right now is Trump winning the election, even by the New York Times. And if the New York Times says it, you know it must be true. Bill Cunningham, the Grand American with you every Sunday night. Ability of government officials to corruptly influence an election? Who has become made a parent? Joseph Asquez is with the Media Research Center, that's Brent Brosell's group, good friend of mine, free speech division thereof.

And Joseph Aska is welcome again to the Bill Cunningham Show. And Joseph, let me lay out a question about what's happening and the sentencing of Donald Trump in about ten days is very much alive on this thing. Are you ready for a tough question to begin the interview? Are you prepared?

Speaker 2

Let's go.

Speaker 3

Let's do it all right. Mark Zuckerberg, who is a multi billionaire and of course runs Facebook and so many other entities and social media, informed the Congress in a letter which I'm looking at in writing, implicating the entire United States government and the Biden administration in a conspiracy to commit election interference. Sometime on or after September of

the sixteenth. Allegedly, Donald Trump's going to be sentenced by a corrupt New York City judge named Luan Mershan because he influenced wrongfully the election of twenty sixteen allegedly by not reporting on a form a payment to a porn star. Now,

all hell's broken loose for my gosh, eight years. So for those who are not paying close attention, Mark Zuckerberg admitted that US government officials of the Department of Justice and the FBI, these are government employees, corruptly told him that there was Russian disinformation in the Hunter laptop and the COVID information. Many people were concerned about the effects of the vaccine. That government officials told social media that be careful about reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop and

nor COVID information because that could be misinformation. And he complied with the government officials to corruptly influence the election of this case of twenty twenty. Can you compare and contrast what Donald Trump did allegedly in twenty sixteen, for which he received thirty four counts of felony convictions. Compare that to Mark Zuckerberg and government officials themselves who censored the social media content to make sure Biden was elected.

Can you tell the American people the differentials?

Speaker 10

Well, big brother certainly pleased with Zuckerberg's actions during the twenty twenty election. That goes without saying and including you know, the COVID, the COVID censorship. But you know what, I have something to say here Zuckerberg's statement, Yeah, three plus years too late. Now when it's essentially workless, you come out and you give this me a kolpa, like we didn't know what you were doing throughout this whole period.

But Biden's collusion with UH with with with social media to Central Americans, Yeah, you know what, that's those news,

And we didn't need Zuckerberg to come out and tell us. Now, actually we've done all this investigation work uncovering it for him, But he knows this isn't cover your behind moment for Zuckerberg because he knows that just in a couple of months there could be a change of administration and President Trump has already iterated, has already stated that he has expected interest in investigating big texts for their roles in manipulating elections. So Zuckerberg report is gonna come out there

and make themselves look like the victim. Why because he.

Speaker 2

Knows that legally he's in deefferty here.

Speaker 10

But why didn't he wait now to say? Why didn't he come out with the statement when it actually mattered? When when the Murphy be Missouri quips before the Supreme Court was going on that literally had to do with government colluding with big tech platforms to Central Americans. With the Supreme Court rules dubiously in favor of the Biden administration, this statement could have been pivotal in shaping the Supreme Court opinion. But no, he wait until after the fact.

Why because he knows that just a few months there could be an administration that actually looked into what he's been doing. He he trying to make himself look like a victim, not as a perpetrator. This is a covery of behind moment, and it's completely worthless. At this point, Zuckerberg knew exactly what he was doing. He wanted a Central Americans to favor his own political outcome. Think about the Zuckerbucks, the things that the hundreds of millions that

have been poured to influence the election. Yeah, of course he's going to come out here and make himself look like, oh, I don't know.

Speaker 1

What I was doing.

Speaker 3

Yeah, and is so corruptly. Unlike other so called influences of an election, this is government employees who have a duty and a responsibility in a sense to regulate Facebook and other social media indirectly and directly telling the goddesses of social media, do not report on the Hunter laptop, do not report on COVID and the vaccine and the effects. And this is the government itself telling a private company

what not to do and what to do. And then the private company, fearing I guess retribution from the FBI and from the Department of Justice, complied with the request to corruptly influence the twenty twenty election. This should be the biggest scandal since Watergate. When government officials act to elect Joe Biden and like this is here, we sit about a week or ten days later. Guess what, Joseph Asquez, It's no big deal. It's out of the media. It's like,

are you kidding me? The FBI and the Department of Justice tells a private entity do not report bad stuff about Joe Biden, and they comply. And now it's an admission from Zuckerberg that he did it. And there's nothing, nothing being discussed anywhere, but Trump's going to be sentenced for giving money to a porn star that supposedly influenced the election in twenty sixteen. What the hell world am I living in?

Speaker 10

Well, George Orwell and all of his brilliants couldn't have imagined that his book nineteen eighty four would have been as prophetic as it actually was. This is nineteen eighty four if it was juiced on steroids. This is what we're dealing with. I mean, so of course the Ministry of Truth is going to try to make it be like, oh, it's not really a big deal. It's no big deal that Zuckerberg put a thing on this cat.

Speaker 2

It's so ridiculous.

Speaker 3

Well, I can only imagine, Joseph, if the shoe was on the other foot. And when Trump's in an office and Trump told his Department of Justice to intimidate private companies to keep from the public domain negative information about Donald Trump, MSNBC would be going nuts at this point demanding more impeachment proceedings. It is unbelievable they got away with this one and it's not reported by the media.

And then you have also the situation whether or not we had the interview about a week or so involving ABC and I'm sorry, involving CNN and Dana Bash Trump and that thing is that thing happened. And now we got the Great Debate coming up on Tuesday, and I don't know if she's going to show up or not. But the governor you mentioned it briefly, Joseph, the zuck Bucks. The zuck Bucks and the twenty twenty election. He put together five hundred million dollars to corruptly influence the twenty

This is off to the side. Explain what the zuck Bucks were, and he says he's not going to do it this cycle, but he could do it through other means. What are the zuck Bucks?

Speaker 10

Oh, I mean, it was just money that Zuckerberg turned out in order to quote uncle, get the vote out. But it was really engineered towards getting the Democratic vote out.

Speaker 2

He have much money, but it's.

Speaker 10

Like, oh my gosh, okay, isn't this isn't this can't be exactly Kosher's legally you know, you know, legally speaking, but his vote was made to look like some sort of non part of an effort, but it was engineered towards getting the Democratic vote out, so he's willing to use it makes fortune in order to do it. Completely insane, completely insane that he's.

Speaker 2

Able to do all of it.

Speaker 10

Now come out with this admission that he actually did censor up. Remember remember years ago, Remember years ago when you were even suggested that the government was colluding with the texts of people. You want a conspiracy here? I mean, what are those people now?

Speaker 3

Well they're not. And I would assume Mark Zuckerberg is thinking, in the back of his huge mind, what if Trump wins the election and appoints a special prosecutor to go after the government officials who corruptly influenced through Facebook the election in twenty twenty. Maybe he's thinking, I better come out with the truth now to curry favor with the Trump administration coming back in their power. Be goes, Oh, hell's going to break loose? Could that be a motivating factor of Mark Zuckerberg?

Speaker 10

Of course, But it's just so stupid because you have literally one of the richest men in the world, and now he's trying to pain himselfs as some kind of a victim. And I'm like, goodness today, do you really how much power is that you're disposal if you really wanted to make a different I mean, these big tech mahamos,

they try to have their taking needed too. They claim Section two thirty protection, they claim teching to thirty protections to make it seem like they're they're not responsible for the content that appear on their platforms, right, But when it makes sense for people, they claim in the other in the other side of their mouth, that they have

a righteous sensor because it's their speech. I'm like, well, what ticket are you claiming that you are not responsible for the speech that's on your platform, But then you want to claim three speech rights when you want to censor people for that speech. I mean, it makes no sense. And now you're trying to make yourself a victim, even though you know you knew you were. You were willing to do it because the party that was putting pressure on you is the party that you curry favor with.

That's the party that you liked, So that's the party that you've been pushing, so you were more than happy to be able to cater to those demands because you realize you could through the election. And Facebook wasn't just the only one that was doing this. It was Twitter, it was Google, it was the other big tech platform that curry favor with the left. So I don't want to hear anything about about you know, paying yourself a

little like a victim. It's pathetic, it's stupid. And Mark Zuckerberg should be absolutely as seemed of himself, especially waiting this late in the game to come out with this statement, should be completely as seemed of himself.

Speaker 3

And Joseph Requez of Media Research Free Speech, I would say this that the national media should be outraged that government officials intimidated private companies to a sense or truthful information that the American people relied upon to cast a ballot. But you don't see CBS, NBC, ABC, New York Times.

You don't see anybody saying, now, wait a minute, you mean the government officials had a conspiracy between themselves to go after social media companies to censor the hunter buying laptop story, which was it was a truthful story in order to elect the candidate. You can only imagine if the shoe was on the other foot what they'd be doing.

And I would point out to the American people that the FBI had the Hunter Biden laptop in December of twenty nineteen, so by the fall of twenty twenty, of course, the FBI knew almost immediately it was legitimate. It wasn't Russian disinformation. The FBI knew it was legitimate, and then lied to big Tech to tell them it's Russian disinformation when they knew the opposite was true. Does not make it worse.

Speaker 10

Oh, absolutely, you know what. I don't want to hear one more one more outbursts. I don't want to hear one more outbursts about a so called threat to democracy from these lesson passed in the media. I don't want to hear I want to hear it ever again, because the last things that these people in the media are protecting is democracy. They're protecting their party. Their version of

democracy is whatever caters to their Awellian Orwellian utopia. That's what they're defending, and it's nothing to do with democracy. I don't want to hear that phrase again. Until they expressed outlays with The fact that a big text that emails like Spinkbook and Zuckerberg and all the rest of them decided that they could single handedly interfere in the election just sway it in one way. That is the most undemocratic thing that you can have in a republican society,

a republican society like the United States. It's the most undemocratic thing that you can that you can have. So I don't want to hear one more one more whining complaining about a so called threat to democracy. It is pathetic that they're still going on with that kind of narrative against the right, even though that it was the less.

It was the less that perpetrated this on American society and pretty much disenfranchised the American voter by promoting this by by by legitimizing what ducker Berg and the rest of them have done.

Speaker 3

Now you also have a posting on your website Media Research Free Speech America about George Soros and his sons who have contributed hundreds of millions of dollars to local prosecutors races, local judge races. We have won here in Cincinnati, Hamleton County, where we have a sitting prosecutor Melissa Powers. She's been in law enforcement more than thirty years and she's running against an opponent who didn't have a law license last year, and it's going to be a tough race.

Can you describe to the American people, whether it's San Francisco, Austin, New York, Cincinnati, whatever, it is that George Soros and his family contribute hundreds of millions of dollars to local prosecutors in order to destabilize government and destabilize law enforcement. How much money is given and what is the intent?

Speaker 10

Oh, it's not even just so much acaus this orif empire is donating money contributing money to this, even though we found about one hundred and seventeen million in total spending on the matter. They are actively directing and fooling these prosecutors. We at the Media Research Center uncovered, through numerous public records requests, seventy seven hundred pages of internal communications between these source prosecutors. They're colluding with one another

on which laws point fourth and which not to. They're not acting in their own rights as a virtue of their own extremism. They're colluding with one another and at the head of a snake of the source back groups like Fair and Dust Prosecution, this radical group that calls mandatory meetings between the source prosecutors across the country to strategize about how about what policies are pushing inside their offices. Their source empire also staffs the offices of these source prosecutors.

These are what these communications have indicated. It's completely insane the amount of collusion that has occurred between these prosecutors. It's like something out of It's like something out out of a movie. So I would encourage everybody. We made all the documents that we had gotten, all seventy seven hundred pages available on our website at a mercy dot org. Check them out and for yourself over port read the documents.

Come to your own conclusions. But it's absolutely scary that Source has been able to use them is not support them in order to corrupt the American criminal justice system. It's not a blind justice system. This is a justice system that has been distorted to favorite sources, open society agenda, and every American to be absolutely terrified that it hit corrupt.

Speaker 3

Well, the goal is to destabilize law enforcement. Right now Minneapolis. Minneapolis is in collapse look at San Francisco, all the problems they are having. Football players are shot in broad daylight. You have New York City with Hamas and Hezbela flags flying all over New York City as they marched thither and fro with their smoke bombs. Thousands of people trespassed commit criminal damaging. Actually had the event at Union Station in Washington, d C. In which thousands of people to

face statues. No one was prosecuted because the prosecutors have been appointed by the radical left, the Kamala Harris types, and those prosecutors don't prosecute, ill arrest. And it's a joke to say that crime is down. What's down is the historical comparison of the collapse of law enforcement in US cities has not been properly addressed as a collapse a law enforcement. More crime is being committed, but less crime is being prosecuted because of George Sorow's prosecutors. And

what they want to do is destabilize this country. Joseph A. Quez, and they're well in their way to getting it done. We got to run. You got the energy, you got the excitement. The information is out there and the American people have a decision to make November fifth, what direction to go and Joseph a Quez once again Media research, Free Speech America. Give my best to Brent Bozell and may God bless you and God bless America. Joseph, thank

you very much. Hi Billy cunning Into Great American, thanks for listening tonight to have before the Great Debate on Tuesday, had some previous a guest talking about it. In many of my callers, it's consequential. I'm willing to predict I'll be with you next Sunday night that Trump is going to do quite well and that the truth will come out about Kamala Harris's flip flop and her chameleon status.

That when Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont said this morning on Meet the Press that of course she has to lie to get votes. And you heard the clip. It's available if you want to listen to it. That demonstrates where the left is because the truth doesn't work, and if the truth doesn't work, the best thing to do is lie for Kamala Harris to get your vote. And so I began by saying, and I'll say it again, I'm not voting for Donald Trump I'm voting for his policies.

I'm not voting for Donald Trump. I'm voting for his policies, whether it's oil independence, whether it's voting for law and order, whether it's voting for a secure border, whether voting for a continued appointment of federal judges, voting for oil independence. I'd vote for the policies, not the man. If I despise. If I met Donald Trump and despised him, if his

policies worked, I'd vote from a heartbeat. On the other end, if I had a good golfing friend who I enjoyed his company, and he was but a friend of mine, I wouldn't vote for him because I don't agree with his policies. Do not vote for the man or the woman. Vote for the policies of that person. And when Bernie Sanders said this morning, the fellow traveler of Kamala Harris, of course she has to lie in order to get your vote. She's going to return to her left wing

San Francisco values. On January the twentieth, I take it to heart. They're telling you the truth to get your vote. Kamala Harris has to lie, and that person is contemptible and not worthy of the office. And I'm not voting for Donald Trump. I'm voting for his policies. I like the guy, but nonetheless his policies work. Thanks for listening. Especially want to thank Scott Powell for coming on tonight

to talk about the debate. On Tuesday Night, Bill cunning Ud, the Great American with you every Sunday night.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android