Every qualifying day book at Choice Hotels dot com. Now here's the man who's been recognized as radio's best, the recipient of not one, but two prestigious Marconi Awards, for he is broadcast excellence, the one and only Bill Cunningham. All right, now, Billy Cunningham, the Great American, is glorious Sunday night, and we are prepared tonight, I think a fabulous show with
many different components and elements. Most importantly, and about twenty hours or so, the Iowa caucuses will be underway, and then we begin the slow process of selecting at least the Republican nominee for president. And then, of course the Democratic nominee has always been and will be somewhat other than Joe Biden. As you know, I've been saying for many months that the Democratic Party is
not that stupid. They can't be that dumb, because what lies ahead is a literal political minefield of difficulties for Joe Biden that deal in three or four or five different areas. Number one is health. He is mentally incompetent to
be the president of the United States. He is so bad that those around him, including those under secretaries in the Defense Department that may have known what Lloyd Austin was going through, thought that Joe Biden was completely irrelevant to the nation's defense, and why tell him, because he doesn't matter, He doesn't count. Know your role and shut your mouth, Joe Scranton, Joe, because those around you understand that you are completely immaterial, irrelevant, you are
a fungent. You don't count. Because when something serious happens, they don't tell the president because his decision making is not relevant to any decision the executive branch is going to make, it'll be done by the donna rices and those around him that actually will tell him what to do. Plus, there's a direct line between those around the president, the so called president and Barack Hussein Obama himself and Michelle Obama, who's getting a much more verbal these days.
She's a much more loud about what danger it is dangerous to have the policies of Donald Trump as opposed to the policies of the Obamas and the Bidens. And so it's a consequence when something really bad happens, like Lloyd Austin is awl He's not some two star. This is the chairman, this is the guy in charge of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. This is
the Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, absent without leave. Don't know where he is, and when the White House discovered where he was, they didn't tell the president because the president's knowledge or decision making is non existent. It doesn't matter what Joe Biden is doing. He gets to work at ten or eleven o'clock in the morning, puts a cap on things at four or five o'clock in the afternoon, and has spent about seventy percent of his time either on
vacation or sleeping. It's like a senior citizen. The retirement center is the White House and the US Senate to a large extent. But in the White House the President is completely mentally incompetent and broken down and can't perform his duties, as evidenced by those around him. When important matters transpire, they don't tell the president because it doesn't matter what he thinks. He doesn't make any decisions. So that is sick and it's sad. And on a side note,
I hope Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin finds his way. Any man and it is a man that has prostate difficulties, not a woman who is having some difficulties for in reason or another. Of course, it could happen to anyone at any point at any time. It is the nature of being seven years old. You have problems. But Lloyd Austin's difficulties. I think listening to some of the Sunday morning talk shows, they seem to imply that he's
still is at Walter Reed, which is fine, it could happen. But the cya what happened is that the White House is putting out the idea that they're disappointed in Lloyd Austin for not telling the President that he's incapable of performing the duties. But it doesn't matter. You know. This is the guy Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin, who testified under oath that the two largest problems facing the military is number one white supremacy and number two climate change and
the impact that military bases have on climate change. I wonder if AMASS and HESBLA. I wonder if the IDF is concerned about climate change or saving their own lives. It is ridiculous, dei is de So much is decided now in government and by corporate America based upon one's race or sex and not based upon their merit or their competency. And so it is sick, and it's
sad that we have a military that's twenty to thirty thousand below enlistment. We have large numbers of the foundation of service in this country, whether it's police officers or correction officers, or deputy sheriffs, or whether it's an ambulance personnel that aren't filling the quotas because don't want to serve, don't want to be involved. And after one year of trying to find white supremacy, about two weeks ago, quietly the Department of Defense and released the study saying there is
none white supremacy, but the damage has already occurred. If you're some white guy, if you're a black person or hispanic, would you want to join an organization that is inherently racist? Of course not so. When the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Millie and the Secretary of Defense testify that there's rampant white supremacy and the US Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Merchant Marines, Coastguard, who wants to join that organization it is filled with racism.
This is after Colin Powell said fifteen or twenty years ago that the most racially free organization in America is the US military, and he would know. But see that didn't fit. It didn't fit the agenda of the radical left to keep the game alive, keep the game going. So very sadly, we have another exposition of what is happening under Joe Biden that must be fixed starting tomorrow. In Iowa. It is colder than a well digger's butt in Iowa,
it's going to be like minus five degrees. But damn, this is so important, incredibly important to the nation to get over and end the regime of Barack Hussein Obama slash Joe Biden and no one in Washington. We have a congressman coming up later who was involved in the deposition of doctor Anthony Fauci, who's a liar, by the way, not the congressman, but doctor
Fauci. We have that circumstance happening right now in Washington, where there is no firm political leadership from the executive branch of government, and in the House of Representatives there's like a two vote majority. With all the Republican resignations, etc. Or indictments of people like Santos, there's like a two vote majority, So they can't get a damn thing done unless the King, Jefferies and Nancy Pelosi agrees, because whatever happens, there's going to be several Republicans on
one side or the other that says we can't go along with that. So now this morning, it was floated the idea on one of the Sunday morning talk shows to have some sort of shared speakership with a Keem Jefferies. Are you kidding me? That is a non starter. That doesn't exist, It cannot occur. So everywhere I look, I see the radical left infiltrating large
parts of our society and hurting it profoundly. Before I get on to the great guests scheduled for tonight, well, one thing caught my eye that is not well publicized headline FAA, this is Pete Buddha Judge's responsibility has a diversity
push that may change DEI the DEE. The Federal Aviation Administration under Pete Buddha Judge, the ridiculous, idiotic mayor of South Bend, Indiana who couldn't fix potholes, has now issued an order that somehow diversity equity and inclusion must be used to put inside the FAA large numbers of persons who are quote underrepresented. Now, as an American that flies on the airlines quite often, I assume
you do a lotter occasionally. I couldn't care less whether the pilot or co pilot, or those servicing the mechanics of the planes, those building it in Seattle with Boeing the seven thirty seven Maxes. I couldn't care less if they're all black, all white, all old, all young, all disabled or not. Couldn't care less. What I care about is a merit based system
where you have to be mentally and physically competent to do the job. You have to be at the starting point involved in airline travel, which is safe. We have the safest airline record despite the seven thirty seven Maxes difficulties in
the history of the world. But listen to this. The FAA is actively recruiting workers who suffer quote severe intellectual disabilities, psychiatric problems, in other mental and physical conditions under a diversity and inclusion hiring system put out by poop Pete not poop Pete, buddhaj Edge, whose Secretary Transportation quote, according to according
to Pete. Quote, targeted disabilities are those disabilities that the federal government, as a matter of policy, has identified for special emphasis in recruitment and hiring. The FAA website says the following quote. Those include those who are hearing vision, missing extremities, partial paralysis, complete paralysis, epilepsy, severe intellectual
disability, and psychiatric disability, and dwarfism quote unquote. The FAA's website shows the agency guidelines university were updated in March twenty third of twenty twenty three. So the FAA wants to bring into the airline industry underrepresented persons, including those who will quote with severe intellectual disabilities and psychiatric disabilities of one type or another. Precisely does the FAA plan to put these people to work inside the airline
industry? I would assume Pete buddhajeedge, because of DEI wants large numbers of those who suffer from, if that's the right term, dwarfism, psychiatric disorders of one type or another, complete paralysis, epilepsy, and severe intellectual disabilities. Now, as an American who travels, would you want someone piloting your plane who suffers from schizophrenia? With effective components. But this person now is in remission and feeling much better. Why is that required? Because it represents
the next frontier. According to Pete Buddha Jedge of Inclusion and diversity in equity. Now you're listening to someone who has spent years as an assistant Attorney General in the state of Ohio conducting hearings on those who are shall we say, mentally unfit, and that somehow there used to be a rather extensive psychiatric hospital system in which individuals were held for three ten thirty days, and then six months, and then every year based upon their disability psychiatrically and how we can
make it better. Many families have been affected by psychiatric disorders and mental difficulties of one type or another. There should be more money spent as available for mental diseases of one type or another. Practically every family, including my own, have had elements family members who suffer from various elements of disability. But it doesn't mean they should pilot an airplane. It doesn't mean that somehow Merit
doesn't count anymore. Diversity doesn't count. It's about equity. Equality doesn't matter. It's about equity and inclusiveness. This is one of the most asinine things I think I've ever read. I thought it was a joke. And what kind of psychiatric disabilities are now permissible? Is a schizophrenia? Well, according to the fa website, those with bipolar disorder or manic depressive disorder, or other disabilities, including schizophrenia with effective components, should be hired by the FAA.
There are no minuscule or menial jobs in the FAA. Everything that happens, including maybe putting a bolt on a piece of metal on a seven thirty seven, is critical to the safety of the millions of Americans and others who travel on American airlines every years. The Feds have they gone bonkers? What in the world could the US taxpayers paying for all this have to gain by the FAA taking action to include in its workforce those who are psychiatrically disabled.
I'm stunned, you kind of I can't make this up. But it's all about not competency with the federal government. It's about DEI diversity, equity and inclusion to apply it completely across the board, including with the FAA. It's unbelievable that this could happen, and it's happening right now in the good old United States of America. So we have a president, by any fair standard,
not covered by the mainstream media who's mentally incompetent. Do you think that Joe Biden could sit for hours on end with interviews by numerous news types probing him on every complicated national and international issue and give answers that made any sense. When's the last time that happened. It doesn't happen, It doesn't occur. He can't campaign, he can't do four to five events a day,
He can't properly read a damn teleprompter, for God's sakes. As opposed to the Trumpster, Donald Trump spent time with Fox, spends time times a time with various interviews, sits for hours, give speeches whatever. The guy's seventy seven years old, but he's mentally alert. Joe Biden. Look at Joe Biden just three years ago. He's physically has changed and mentally has changed. Imagine this, We have fifteen minutes to respond to a ICBM thermonuclear attack against
the United States of America before cities are taken out fifteen minutes. In that fifteen minutes, the president with the football communicates directly with the Secretary of Defense who directly communicates to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to directly communicate to our Air Force and other service elements in Colorado quickly a decision must be made. Does anyone think that Joe Biden could make a decision of that character
to launch ICBMs from South Dakota or from submarines? Does anyone think that that's even receivable? The answer, of course is no, it is not conceivable. Secondly, how incompetent is Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin when he goes awol for about a week and no one in the Defense Department or in the executive
branch of government knows where he is. He is incompetent. This is the guy who says that white supremacy and climate change mitigation at US military basis is the most critical fears he has and factors his Secretary of Defense who simply walks away for a week and doesn't tell anyone where he is. What if we were attacked by the North Koreans or by the Chinese at that moment, if they knew what was going on, we had no chain of command, It
didn't exist. Some under secretary or administrative assistant would make a decision to launch thermonuclear weapons because the president is incompetent and this Secretary of Defense can't be located. I can't imagine a captain somewhere in a rock US military captain missing for a week in action, wondering, Hey, where is Captain Danny Gleeson, Well, he's gone. Where is he? We don't know? How's this possible? You can only imagine, only imagine if this happened during the Trump
administration, how ugly, how ugly the media coverage would be. But quickly this thing is ignored in the FAA's insane diversity push to put in the pilot's seat those suffering from psychiatric disorders is part of Pete Buddha Judge's desire to have an underserved population serve for the US government, as if no other job they could do. It is unbelievable, what's happening. That's why what's going to
happen tomorrow in Iowa begins the process and it is critical. Let's continue with more if a line becomes available eight sixty six six four seven seven three three seven, And as we continue, we'll talk about what's at stake tomorrow in Iowa and break down. Who's going to join you and I tonight? Bill Cunningham, the Great American with you every Sunday night, Billy Cunningham, the Great American, And we've lost our mind. Things are crazy, things are
unbelievable. You can't make it up. You can't actually say that the US government wants to fill airline jobs with those suffering from mental disabilities and schizophrenica. You can't make that up. But I read their website and some minor reporting on it. Because this will never hit the major newspapers or major cable channels or ABCNBACBA, because it makes Pete buddhaj Edge and Joe Biden look completely stupid
and incompetent, So that'll never happen. But we cannot, I cannot say more clearly that what begins tomorrow in Iowa has got to be to change the regime in Washington before it's too late, and it's getting later and later and later. Let's continue with more coming up later will be Professor Bruce Fleming, who has spent more than thirty years as a professor at Annapolis the Naval Academy. He's written a book which explains what's happening there, and it's frightening.
Let's continue Bill Cunningham, the Great American with you every Sunday, know my Billy Cunningham, the Great American. And coming up later we have Congressman brad Winstrip. You may recall the media doesn't cover this well because it makes doctor the Bidens. The winners are Hunter Biden, the Clintons, Barack Hussein Obama and of course his lovely wife Michelle, likely to be the Democratic nominee for president, by the way, and doctor Anthony Fauci and doctor Collins of nih
And they're the ones that the media protects at all costs. And very rarely do you see someone say that, you know what, doctor Anthony Fauci lied repeatedly to the American people. I'll say it, he lied repeatedly to the American people, and as a consequence, persons died because of the negligence and failures of our federal government. But because the media is invested in the success of doctor Anthony Fauci, we will not know the truth for a while.
But last week the Select Committee on COVID Origins, headed up by doctor and Congress and Brad Winstrup is going to join us in about join us a little bit. About twenty thirty minutes. Conducted two days of transcribed interviews with doctor Anthony Fauci, in which they won over all the elements of COVID nineteen. As things turn out, because something much worse than COVID nineteen may be planned by the American people. It may be even worse than what happened then.
And so what we have then is a circumstance where sometime later this month or next, doctor Anthony Fauci will be in the Congress, in the House of Representatives, testifying under oath about the numerous mistakes, airs and lies. One may think, okay, the six foot separation rule, well, that's a problem because there was no science backing it up, whether it was four feet,
five feet, six feet, ten feet, twelve feet. And I believe that doctor Anthony Fauci's he's going to testify that he picked that number out of thin air six feet, seven feet eight feet. But everyone took it
as gospel, didn't they. He also talked about wearing a mask. And you might know right now there are many hospitals and blue cities and blue states that make everyone wear a mask well, Doctor Anthony Fauci will testify that there's no double blind studies indicating that mask wearing is effective at all, except maybe in a surgical setting when you scrub down the arms, the fingertips, and the nails, and you have assistants or nurses put the gloves on, and
you put the mask on, and maybe an n ninety five mask works in that situation. But the way masks are being worn by the American public has zero effect on transmission. Did you know that? Secondly, and thirdly, how much money? How many millions did doctor Anthony Fouch you make off of
COVID nineteen. You may remember we were told early on that there were special creepy crawling creatures, including bats, in caves all over China, and that somehow they made their way to a wet market near the Wuhan Lab, and as a consequence, some worker in the lab went into the wet market and somehow got infected by a bat or some other crawling creature, who then took it back into the lab unbeknownst to him, and people started dying. That
was a lie. How about this one? It appears that gain of function research, in which you take a virus, to manipulate the genome of that virus with other viruses and create something that is more communicable and more deadly. And who funded that research do you think? Well, that was funded by the American taxpayer. And so early on, doctor Anthony Fauci could not in good conscience tell the truth about that, because if he did, he might
have been indicted by the Trump administration. But he didn't want to do that, did he, of course not? Because the truth did not work. That was a problem. So coming up later, we're going to have testimony under oath in public this month or next about the failures of the federal bureaucracy
to keep the American people safe and informed. And I want to shout from the world's tallest mountain, you, as an American taxpayer, paid for the Wuhan Lab to create COVID nineteen that resulted in about a million Americans being killed
by a virus and maybe ten men around the planet. And that those responsible, that doctor Anthony Fauci types and doctor Collins, Francis Collins, have gotten off scott free with government parachutes paying them hundreds of thousands of dollars every year and seemingly made millions of dollars in private investments, and they've got away with it. And I hope that the bureaucracy, mainly are Democrats working in the federal bureaucracy, the fourth branch of government, is in the business of not
in any good way making sure that this does not happen again. In fact, that it's very likely it will occur again. And when the public testimony is made available sometime later this month or next, you're going to see again the Democrats defending all the decisions of doctor Anthony Fauci, because that's a bureaucrat, that is someone they're connected to, that is someone they're going to protect. It is sick, and it's sad, and that's what's happening page two.
Tomorrow in Iowa, we begin a critical part of changing the thrust of what government should be starting in November fifth, later this year. Imagine if the interchangeable drill Bit stays in office as a Democrat. It might be could be unlikely Joe Biden is reelected, or Kamala Harris takes over under the twenty fifth Amendment between now and then, or Gavin Newsom or my choice for the
Democrats. Is Michelle Obama who can jump in in July and August and simply dominate the Democratic field at the convention in Chicago and become the Democratic nominee. She doesn't have to raise money. The media will fall at her feet and praise her, although she's held no political office and has made one hundred million dollars out of Netflix, and she is the likely nominee of the Democrat Party. But she would encourage the Marxism and leftism of the policies of Joe Biden.
Imagine right now, the policies of Joe Biden, more or less the bureaucrats around him continuing open borders on the southern part of our great country. Imagine that is happening not the last three years, but for the next eight to ten years, because once Michelle gets into office, she'll be there for eight years, in which case her husband, Barack Hussein Obama would basically run
things. Imagine open borders for another eight to ten years, leading to massive increases and spending on welfare and food and food stamps, and national debt and more. The bankruptcy of America as well under way as I speak. We cannot survive. We cannot survive with thirty four trillion dollars in national debt and adding two trillion dollars every year. But that's the plan to assume. Would
you assume the logical consequences of one's actions? And so right now we have, beginning tomorrow in Iowa, a circumstance where we must, by any means necessary, legally, morally, and ethically, begin the process of changing the government in Washington. The open borders are overwhelming our major, magnificent cities and will eventually lead to the collapse of civil society and eventually the United States of
America. A country without borders is not a country at all. How many times I had a distant family member related to me about two weeks ago that she went to an emergency room. And I live in Cincinnati, Ohio, and she went to a big city hospital and she was number sixty two in line to be treated in the er. She had blood pressure that was two hundred and over at one point eighty, and she had a slow heartbeat, and she was sweating, and she sat there for four hours waiting to be
served. That's in Cincinnati, Ohio. Can you imagine reporting to the er in Los Angeles or Chicago, or god forbid, New York City, because we've admitted into this country tens of millions of individuals who don't belong here and are here illegally. So eventually the United States of America will kill itself internally through suicide, not by some foreign power taking over. Open borders have produced, in addition to what's happening in our civil society, an unpresident and crime
epidemic. Have you seen the smashing grabs? Have you seen what's happening in Portland? Oakland basically is emptying out Oakland. California may not exist in three years. That's why seventy percent of US say that America is on the wrong track. Joe Biden is letting into America the world's most violent criminals and rapists and robbers and drug dealers MS thirteen gang bangers, all with a dramatic shortage
of police. So, on one hand, we have unprecedented crime being committed in our previously magnificent American cities, and on the other hand, the policies of the Democrats indicate that we need fewer police and pay them less money. Add on top of that, the healthcare system is near collapse. The public school system is done, and that'll be a disaster for America's children. The classrooms are completely overcrowded or being emptied out by New York City to let more
illegals go into high schools and live there. There aren't enough teachers, not enough teachers, age, not enough principles. The schools are overwhelmed with crime and gangs and drugs and teen pregnancy. In fact, there are many vending machines in major American cities in the high schools that have condoms and plan B contraception inside the school. Also, the open borders a our national security catastrophe.
Why because we have no idea how many military age single males have come into America from Iran, from Iraq, from Africa, or from China or from North Korea. We have no idea. We can only guess what happens if and when the Chinese military or the Iranians say, we need America to be pinned down inside the United States of America. Let's take care of the power grid inside the United States. Blow up a few buildings and a few
bridges. Let's march. Large numbers of foreigners led into this country because of open borders are leading to the death of American cities filled now with the crime and homeless people needles. San Francisco is a poop map. You've got to get your poop map out to literally walk around. And also, we're going to talk about doctor Anthony Fauci and his sworn testimony in about a half an hour. But how many open borders have led to Third World diseases like measles
and mumps and strapped yellow fever, dang and polio. How much does that happen. It's going to lead to the bankruptcy of our healthcare system. It's not coined, it's not created to handle an additional ten to twenty to thirty million people with unique diseases. We're paying for the world sick, and ordinary medical care for the rest of US, tens of millions of Americans is gone.
It's unbelievable. One has to assume that what Abraham Lincoln said about one hundred and fifty years ago, that when America falls, it will not be by a foreign power. It'll be because the United States itself committed suicide. We're in the process now of committing suicide. Why one might say, I have no idea as to why this is happening. But I must assume that the Democrats must intend the actual logical consequences of their actions because they dislike this
country. They want to destroy the United States of America. The Marxist liberal Democrats. They hate America, They hate American citizens. They want you to live in poverty and misery, and they want you to suffer because that gives them more power. They don't want independent Americans making independent decisions independently. They want to collapse the middle class with electric vehicles and with expensive gasoline and the
power grid going down. They want to get rid of the public school system and public health in this country, because then you have chaos, nothing but unbelievable chaos, whether it's healthcare, the military, the lack of police. Too many liberal federal judges, mayor adams in New York City kicking children out of public schools and putting in large numbers of illegals, and somehow that's supposed
to be acceptable. Many times you have to wait weeks, months, or years to get a doctor's appointment because the system is not created to handle this many individuals. You're going to wait months to get specialized treatment or surgery while in pain and misery, which is happening now in England in many European countries. And the cost for you, as an American paying health care costs are
going to skyrocket, and your health insurance premiums or skyrocket. So warrior taxes, our government is providing free healthcare, like in California, to millions of poverty stricken illegal foreign invaders who have no right to be here in the first place. So when that transpires, guess what, those who pay into the system are going to pay a lot more for Plan B, Plan C, and your corporate plans have skyrocket and they're going to keep going that way.
And could these foreigners bring in a new disease a pandemic? Absolutely, who's going to suffer. You are going to suffer. That's what's on the ballot tomorrow. So let's continue with more. And my god, are we in trouble. We're in serious difficulty. It's awful. It's going to get worse. It's not going to get better. It's going to go one direction, which is not a good one. So coming up later, we have that
same Congressman, brad Winstrop. They spent at least two days the past week dealing with doctor Anthony Fauci talking about the origins of COVID nineteen, how much money he made from COVID nineteen, the lies told about the Wuhan virus, the lies told about schools closing under his orders, the six foot separation, the masking, all of which made no sense at all. And it's flabbergasting to me that we used to have a media. We had a media at
one point that would spend its time faring out corruption. There is so much corruption in the Biden family. You can't get all the corrupt individuals straight. You have so much corruption. Now in Fulton County with Fannie Willis the prosecutor, I guess boyfriend is appointed Nathan Wade to conduct the most important criminal investigation and indictment in the history of the state of Georgia, that is indicting Donald Trump in a sense to put him in a Georgia's date prison for life.
And Nathan Wade, is so called boyfriend of Fannie Willis, has received clothes to a million dollars from Fanny Willis to investigate Donald Trump and then she benefits from that by going on expensive trips all over the world with her boyfriend who's
now going through a divorce. And when I watched some of the coverage this morning, even CNN had a lucid moment in which they had an expert on saying, this doesn't smell right, This isn't proper to have the prosecutor herself benefiting by the appointment of the special counsel to indict Donald Trump in about nineteen other individuals. So Fannie Willis is participating in the money caused by the lawyering to put Donald Trump in a Georgia's date prison for the rest of his life.
And even CNN thought that was a problem. CNN had a lucid moment, which is unbelievable. So let's continue with more plus later on a fabulous story, and it's a sad one. But later on we have on a thirty year plus individual as a professor at Annapolis, and he's a great American professor, Bruce Fleming, who has written a book about how DEI is destroying the nation's service academies. So I had seen an interview that Professor Bruce Fleming did a few weeks back, and I asked him, how do you keep
your job? In fact, as he didn't keep his job. He wanted to expose what's happening with DEI, and when he did, the Service Academy fired Professor Bruce Fleming, but then he sued and got his job back. He's written a fabulous book about how DEI is destroying the Service academies from Annapolis to West Point to Colorado Springs, the Air Force. And he knows exactly of what he's speaking because he's been teaching as a professor, not in the
military, but as his civil professor for more than thirty years. And guess what he speaks the truth about what the military is doing to itself, which is why so few now want to enlist. Plus later on is Scott Powell, who's written a long article of Newsmax about how much trouble we're in. But more importantly, Scott Powell of the Discovery Institute is a fabulous guy who is very positive. So we're going to deal with him and more so if
a line becomes available. Eight sixty six six four seven seven three three seven Bill Cunningham, the Great American with you every Sunday Night, Bill Cunningham, Stay tuned for more. Congressman Brad winsterbuff next to ask doctor Anthony Couci, two days of questions Bill Cunningham with you every Sunday Night, Willie Buck You by Choice Hotels, econor Rogen Roadway in Hotels are serving up double points for
every qualifying stay book at Choice Hotels dot com. Now here's the man who's been recognized as radio's best, the recipient of not one, but two prestigious Marconi Awards for he is broadcast exodens, the one and only Bill Cunningham. Bill cunning in the Great American as you may know, Congress been Representative brad Winstrop has been in Congress now about ten or twelve years. He decided at the end of this year to pack it in and go back to the back
to the vineyards. Let someone else drink the wine, and he's going to go back to his ordinary life, which makes a lot of sense to those who know what Washington is. But there's been a lot of reporting this week on the two days of transcribed interviews he had with doctor Anthony Fauci. Later on there's going to be the same interviews, not under oath, but they're
told ahead of time. They're governed by the rules of perjury. The doctor Francis Collins is also going to testify with the idea down the road, maybe this month or next to have the testimony public, in which case doctor Anthony Fauchi will have to answer to be kind, the misconceptions and the mistakes that he's made, to be unkind, the lies that he told over the last several years. Because doctor Anthony Fauci has been not beatified. He's been saying
it by the mainstream media. But Congressom brad Winstrop is a doctor and he's head of the subcommittee in the House on Select Committee on COVID, the Origins and the fallout. And Congressome brad Winster, welcome again to the Bill Cunningham Show. And can you tell the American people essentially, why did you conduct two days of private interviews looking forward to his public test cimony at some point
this month or next. Yeah, the private interviews do very well as far as being able to ask a lot of questions, whereas in the other members have five minutes to ask questions and they know they can just beat the clock. In this case, we have a little bit more time. I'll tell you, we could have gone two or three more days to be honest with you with all the questions we had, but we still learned a lot. Let me, let's face it, Anthony Fauchi was the face of the pandemic
or the government's response to the pandemic. He weighed in on a lot of issues. But in these transcribed interviews over one hundred times, just on the first day, over one hundred times, he said he didn't remember things, but we learned a lot. Anyway. You know, we asked him about how they came up with the six feet of social distancing and he said it
just sort of appeared. Yet I think most America thought that he was speaking with some kind of scientific background on that, but no, it just appeared and that's what they went with. And we had similar questions when it comes to mask. You know, was there a double blind study does show effectiveness or anything along that line. There really wasn't, per se And of course he changed his mind on that. He said mask won't do any good.
And the next thing, you know, people are being told they have to wear them, and you know what, if you don't know, just say you don't know, but you think it might help, you know. But that was never the case. Everything was I know, and you just have
to follow. But it was really interesting too. So you have the situation of the United States government funding grants that are for people to perform research in Wuhan, China with coronaviruses, likely doing gain a function type research where you're taking viruses, altering them around, either through multiple passages through animals or just changing them by kind of working like legos if you will, and if you put it more dangerous part that makes it more infectious to humans, that is
gain of function research, or if it happens if you're running it through animals, but that's gain of function research as everyone understands it, and you know, you go back to twenty eleven, doctor Fauci and doctor Collins wrote an article about it. They realized there's risk involved with it. They had that in their article twenty twelve. Doctor Fauci said in an interview that the benefits outweighed the risk even though the question was posed, are you concerned it could
create a pandemic? So we know where they were and where they have been on this. But the process in NIH is there's an advisory board that reviews the grants, doctor Fauci said. He said, I I just signed it. My job is only to sign them after they've been approved. And then we got into then we got into oversight of these grants. So you know, the question starts coming where does the buck stop with any who's responsible for
anything. We said, well, what about the grants, because we know, for example, Eco Health Alliance have got a grant to do this type of research in China was not keeping up with the responsibilities of filing their periodic reports of the progress of their work. But no red flag went off at NIH or N I A I D, which doctor Fauci's in charge of, and no red flag goes off to say, hey, you owe us these reports. And when we asked him about that, he said, well that's
over in compliance and I don't have anything to do with this. So you know, he just signs off on grants for research he hasn't He says he hasn't explored, and then if things aren't going well, then that's not his fault either. You know, we asked about do you have oversight over foreign labs when we invest in do research, and he said, oh, I wouldn't even know how to do that. So it seems like he's just saying
on all these things. That's somebody else. That's not my job. Basically, he says, I was focused on the virus, and I was focused on a vaccine. We talked to him about mandates, which he supported. He felt that, you know, all the more people would get vaccinated, the less people will die. That's what he says. But he then he admitted he said, I guess I didn't really I'm trying to paraphrase here understand the psyche of America. And I said, no, you didn't, And
you took doctors out of the equation because never was it. You know, understand your own health situation with your doctor. Understand what the vaccine can and can't do. Because even from the trials, we knew that people got vaccinated, they still got COVID in many cases. Sure people were dying and cure people being hospitalized. And you know, you had President Biden saying, if you get the vaccine, then you won't go to the ICU and you won't
die. Well, that wasn't true, and he never he never contradicted the President on that. He never let the American people know the truth about that. So this is all of this is where the trust broke down. And
I just said to him, the messaging was just terrible. And actually, you go back to the Trump administration where I'd recommended when they came to the doctors caucus, I said, I think America needs to hear from the doctors that are treating COVID patients, not the politician and not the person in the lab. And so we really came away with a lot of things. And there are people that we've spoken to positions of authority that to tell a different
story than we're hearing from doctor Fauci. And we did have doctor Collins in actually a few days after doctor Fauci. And so again, one of the interesting components is that most people might recall the exchange with Senator Paul where Senator Paul says, you were funding gain to function research in China, and he said, no, we weren't. You don't know what you're talking about. Well, lo and behold. After that, he comes up with a new
definition for gain of function research. Gain of function research in every article I've read, and I have read many, many of these articles is about enhancing a virus that makes it more infectious, not just infectious to the point of a pandemic, but just makes it more infectious. So his new operative definition, as he coined, it means that it becomes a potential pandemic pathogen. Well that's a different story than anyone's ever said about gain of function. So
conveniently now he and doctor Collins say, oh, that's the definition. We were thinking about change, But the NIH website did not say what it says now they did that after that conversation with doctor Paul. All Right, Doctor and Congressman brad Winstrop is someone that's covered this for the last since March of twenty twenty. I thought the sixth foot and the masking was a placebo in
order to get the masses to understand what a serious problem it is. And so when doctor Fauci, everywhere you went there was six foot separation, there was no study to indicate that was effective. And that's the truth. Masking. There's maybe an N ninety five in a surgery setting may work, but
there was no double blind studies indicate the masking had any impact. Also, just as someone who covered this, as I understand it, the original goal of doctor Collins and doctor Fauci was to convince everyone that there was some bat cave in southern China, where these nasty bats developed COVID nineteen and somehow made their way to a wet market just happens to be right up against the Wuhan virus facility, just happened to be there, and that these wet little animals
were infected, and that it was created not in a lab, but created by the bats. So you can't sue a bat. And I thought the reason that story came out is because they had to keep the truth from the American people that the American taxpayer funded the Wuhan lab to gain a function. Research was to take a virus that was a little bit communicable, litle bit making someone sick, and to make it more communicable and make it more deadly.
And when the American people knew that doctor Anthony Fauci funded the creation of COVID nineteen that killed about one million Americans and maybe ten million around the world, he would be somewhere in Leavenworth. So they couldn't tell the truth about that matter because they were complicit. Am I on the mark off the mark? Where am I in those comments? Well? I think everything points in that direction, especially if you follow the conversations that took place with doctor Collins
doctor Fauci and a group of sciences that he put together. Doctor Fauci said, well, every environmental virologist that I know of, you know, they wrote this piece too. They said that it came from nature. Well, that article proximal Origins. He put these scientists together. In their internal conversations, they keep saying, well, this thing looks engineered. We sort can't
rule that out. Even the day that doctor Fauci took that article Proximal Origins to the White House lawn and said, look, these scientists said it came from nature, he didn't tell everybody that he was involved with these guys. And even doctor Fauci said, well, we know in fact that they were doing this sipe of research in China. During our conversation, he says,
yeah, I probably shouldn't have said in fact. Well you did say in fact, and you said in fact because the people who wrote that it came from nature were telling you that this was going on there and that they thought it looked engineered. But they didn't think it was going to be good to get that out. So they write this article not only that, studying the science of what they proposed, how it could have happened in nature. The
bats were in Yunnan Province. The other component that was added to the backbone, if you will. The virus was something that came from an animal called a pengulin, and they're over in Guangdong Province and Wuhan is then Hubei Province. They're not anywhere near each other. They are a triangle. So this bat had to have exchange something with the pangulin through another animal. That's how
that happens. So you take virus from one animal, virus from another, and they both get into a certain animal, creating this new virus, and then somehow there's no direct line here. They end up in a wet market and where is that animal? And none of them have tested positive. There's
flaws and assumptions with this article. When I asked doctor Fauci now that he says he's open to the idea that it could come from the lab, I took him through some articles and some very great scientific articles saying how they could make a virus like this just like this. They reverse engineering muta genesis. They can do this stuff in the lab, and it's all out there. And I asked him if he read any of that, and he said, no, Well, so how thorough is this man being not really or just
right? Well? And the other issue is how much money did doctor Anthony Fauci make off this entire matter. Because there's been some Senator rand Paul and others between you and Senator ran Paul, we know a lot more about this. The mainstream media will never cover this because they have sainted doctor Anthony Fauci and sent them off with the golden parachute. Is there any evidence that personally doctor Anthony Fauci made millions of dollars off COVID nineteen Well, I think that
they're very well could be, and that's why we're looking into it. And I will tell you when we go to the agencies and we ask questions, give us information about the grands, give us information about this, and they fight us tooth and nail. That should not be how the American government works. This is the government of we the people. And when Congress says we need this information from agencies that we created, agencies that we fund, there
should be no hesitation. We have to write two or three letters, they stall, We threatened subpoena and then they come around, or we have subpoena to get a lot of the information that we have. It's absurd, and the American people deserve a whole lot better. And it's just one word,
honesty, And that seems to be missing tremendously from the whole conversation. And there seems to be a lot of people that want don't want us to know a lot of different things, and what you just mentioned is one of them. How much money was made? And what is that route? Congress and brad windstrip six foot separation? No science based upon that. Schools were closed. Fauci said he had nothing to do with that, which was a lie.
The origins were less than truthful because the origins would indicate that the Ruhan Lab, funded by the American taxpayer, created it. It was man made masking, no double blind studies on what kind of mask, how to wear the mask, none of that worked, gain of function research. Lies were everywhere by the officials and the bureaucracy. Congressman is simply waiting for you and
Senator Rand Paul to lead office. The fourth branch of government is the most powerful because they're not going anywhere, and they know they're going to have democratic stooges supporting them. And when you go after doctor Anthony Fauci. You're going to have the New York Times, the Washington Post, CBS, ABC, NBC coming after the critics and not going after doctor Anthony Fauci and doctor Francis Collins and what they did beginning four years ago or eight years ago, because
the truth doesn't fit the narrative. And as a consequence, we had a COVID nineteen that killed about one million Americans, which is something like one third of one percent. One third of one percent or less died of COVID nineteen one third of one percent. But there are more more effective viruses out there that exist that have a much higher death rate. The death rate here was largely among older folks and those who were immune compromised under the age of sixty
five. The great majority were older folks. But right now there are viruses being created in certain places, and I'm sure you're familiar with them that indicate they might have a fatality rate of seventy percent or fifty percent, not one third of one percent. So your goal here is to find out the origins and what to do to save the next one. What is what is your
fear about this? What is your fear going forward, Well, you know, I sit on the Intelligence Committee, and when COVID started, I was first looking into like how do we diagnose this and how do we treat people? And it was vague, it was novel. But in the process and even before COVID, I was interested in bioweapons programs of our adversaries, especially
and especially China. And so that's one of my biggest concerns is developing a weapon of mass destruction basically, and are we prepared to handle that if and when it occurs. And so that China's been talking about this kind of substance two thousand and five, and our State Department has come out publicly and said that as far back as two thousand and five. So how can you not look at the fact that China has these programs in Wuhan and not put the
two together. And there are people that work with the military that we're working in Wuhan. So there's just so much there. The writings on the wall, it's very dangerous, very serious, and I don't understand why this became a part of an issue. You look, there were three thousand people that died on nine to eleven, and that was a catastrophe for sure. We went to war for twenty years, and we were united in that, especially
at the beginning. Here this happened and it became a political nightmare, and I believe in part because it was the presidential year coming up that made it worse. But one point two million died in this. And if you get a chance when the transcripts are released, you'll see that when the Democrats were asking questions, it was almost as though they were just a few additional defense
attorneys on behalf of I mean it really any tough questions. Yeah, well, I'll tell you what we have to run, brad Winstrip, but I'll look forward to later this month or next month to watch them live on TV. It's going to be wild. But once again, I want to thank you and Senator Ran Paul for the work that you've done. Your voice is crying truth in the wilderness. Once again. Congressman brad Winstrip, thank you for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show. Thank you, Congressman, Thank you.
Bill. Let's continue for the line becomes available eight sixty six six four seven seven three three seven. That guy knows where the bodies are buried. And at this point we have serious problems in the media, and the Democrats couldn't care less. Bill Cunningham with you every Sunday night, I Bully Cunningham
must continue. Coming up next, it's going to be a professor Bruce Fleming, professor at Annapolis, going to talk about what's happening to our service economies, the service academy, shall I say, under the leadership of DEEI. And this is in just a Biden problem going on for many years. Professor Bruce Fleming from Annapolis, from the Naval Academy. His next, Bill Cunningham, with you every singing right, Bill Cunningham, the great American. Of
course, we have difficulties many places. We can't get the right kinds of police officers in order to serve in our major cities. The recruitment goals enlistment goals of the US military is they're losing not ten to twenty thousand a month, and the best and the brightest are leaving. And of course one of
the foundations of our country's greatness are the service academies. And I can't speak more highly of my good friend Roger Staubach, and he certainly talked the talk, walked the walk, did everything that he could he was a mayor and hero in my opinion, he went through the Service Academy. And we have joining you and I now as Bruce Fleming, who spent about thirty years as
a professor at the US Naval Academy. He's written some twenty books, and one of the books recently out is Saving Our Service Academies, The Battle with and for the US Naval Academy to make thinking officers. And in the book, there's a concern that this gentleman has, and he's spent decades at the Service Academies, that something is wrong. Once proud citadels of virtue, the US military academies have lost their way and are running on fumes. They need
to be fixed before it's too late. And Bruce Fleming, welcome to the Bill Cunningham Show. Is because you have all the information you were there. What is some of the major difficulties at least in the Naval Academies West Point and in Colorado Springs. What are the difficulties currently in the US military academies. Yes, absolutely, that's the focus of my book. Let me start by saying that your verb tense, I have to object to that. I
still am a professor at the United States Naval Academy. But that's related to the problems. I've been there since nineteen eighty seven, and I started writing about these problems probably twenty years ago, and the administration didn't like that a bit, and so they punished me in an increasing scale of slaps. They weren't just slaps on the wrist. They were things like letters of reprimand official letters of reprimand loss of pay raise investigations that were cooked up in order to
make my life hell. And they finally threw their pail mary and fired me in twenty eighteen with no justification whatsoever. That stood up in court because when the judge got his hands on it a year later, he reinstated me retroactively. So I'm still there, and yes, we have problems. They when I first started writing about was what seemed to me the clearly illegal race based admissions policy. So we're letting in kids not based on their being the best
and the brightest. We've let that one go down the stream. It's race. They're obsessed with that. They want non white officers. Now you can say that that's justified to some degree, because there are a lot of non white enlisted but in practical terms, what it means is that a guy or gal who could have performed at a higher level at the Naval Academy is denied entrance and someone who almost invariably performs at a lower level is given the slot.
So I thought that was illegal even under the two thousand sir. Right now, you may be aware the Supreme Court has given the Service Academies a pass on that, so all of a sudden they're in clover all of a sudden, they can do it there. So that's problem number one. And you know how I feel about it is is one thing. I mean, I had just come. My PhD is from Vanderbilt, not too far from where you're sitting right now, in nineteen eighty two, and I was a
Fulbright scholar in West Berlin. I talked for two years in West Germany. But I came to Annapolis after two years in the Central African country of Rwanda, which you've heard of, because that's where they started killing each other after I left, thank goodness. So everybody's black in Rwanda, so race does not play a role. So here I get on the emission spoort at the
Naval Academy and we're purposely selecting according to race. That's racist. So I objected to it and I wrote about it, and the administration didn't like that a bit, so they started slapping me around. Point Number two was they're picking up the vibes from the world outside and they're taking marching orders from Congress, and Congress says, you will, you will put into play the Obama era understanding of what constitutes sexual assault and sexual harassment, which is to a
very low bar. Indeed, I won't go into chapter and verse on how that works out, but that gist of it was that the men were set against the women and all the in the first instance instance with the racial admissions, most many of the black kids objected because they said, look, this
makes us look bad, and you know, I hate being one. One woman sat in my office and said she hated she They were trying to make her join the gospel choir, and she said, I should have gone to Howard, which is the black university, the pre eminent black university in Washington. Said why should you have gone to Howard? She said, because here they want me to be black. They want me to be in the gospel choir. And she says, I can't sing. So that was point number
one. Point number two the sexual assault thing. Yeah, the sexual assault thing is it said, you know the guy has. First of all, let me be clear, they're not supposed to even be holding hands on our in what was called the yard because it's a military installation. But of course they're more than holding hands. We're about forty percent women now Outgays are permitted, even transsexuals are permitted. So of course they're fooling around with each other.
They're eighteen to twenty one or twenty two, they're full of hormones and they're messing around. I mean, that's what happens on every college campus, only it's forbidden at Annapolis. So under pressure from Congress, the academies wanted, they actually wanted complaints of sexual assault to show that they were playing the
game. So a guy has what he thinks is a consensual relationship with a girl, and she's encouraged months after the fact, sometimes even months to say, oh no, well she wasn't actually on board, but that she was pressured and so on. I saw that happen with my students. It sets
the men against the women. The third thing is our newest instantiation of outside forces, which is what they call DEEI Diversity, equity and inclusion, and it means hiring people, hiring people because they're not straight, hiring people because they're not not white, and teaching classes and all those things. So we now have, you know, the whiplash at the service academies is amazing. First they said, you know, no women, no, no way.
Okay, in nineteen seventy six they got women, they treated them badly. For a while they said no no gay, no gay people in the services, and you know, and then all of a sudden, okay, you know, we're gonna have gays. We have an LGBT plus club, we
have courses in that. I do not have a problem with that. But it's the problem is that in the service academies all this stuff, which of course are happening, the stuff that the same stuff that's happening at civilian universities is imposed by the power of the UCMJ, the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So that means that the men can be court martialed if the woman makes the complaint. Invariably, when it gets to a real court, the Annapolis
loses. But they're going to go with it. They're going to go with it. Professor, Let's break this down a little bit. Because the US Supreme Court did rule in the affirmative Action case for special purposes. The military is not covered by this. But you're saying, and you're on the ground, you're there, you know what's happening in Annapolis and the other service academies
that race based admissions is inculcated within the fabric of Annapolis. That is, there'll be Asian kids, there may be Jewish kids, there may be white kids that are better qualified, better grades, whatever it might be, and they are victims of race discrimination based upon the color of their skin. And because of that Supreme Court decision a few months ago, that's not going to
change anytime soon. And you make the point in your books saving our Service Academies, Why has in the US won a war since World War Two? Well, in the service academies you have black cadets saying, and now wait a minute, I feel as if I'm here because of the color of my skin. You put black against white, straight against gay, men against women, and military preparedness is certainly is affected. And so we now know why we have terrible and one other point and I want to get back to you
on the sex scandal. I can recall fifteen or twenty years ago when Colin Powell as was in charge, and Colon Powell, Secretary of State, came up through the ranks and said the US military is the most meritocracy based institution in the country, that it's all based upon merit going back fifteen or twenty years. He began in the service in the nineteen seventies and he's now moved
on, passed on. But nonetheless, what is the consequence, Professor Bruce Fleming, what is the result of DEI will almost like cancer cells infecting our service academies in a practical way. What are the real impacts? Well, the real impact I think you've already sketched. Let me right build on what on that point, let me just say Asian kids. Now, they decided
you were talking about Asians being denied. That was the Harvard case. Interestingly enough, at Annapolis they decided, subsequent to my being on the admissions board that Asians were also a minority. They were after so they're only about five six percent Asians, and that includes Indians, that includes Filipinos. There are a lot of Filipinos in the American Navy, and those are kept classes Asians anyway, it's about five percent in the Navy. But they decided they were
going to go after Asian kids. So we have a lot of recent Chinese immigrants. They're citizens. Everybody has to be a citizen. Sometimes they're English is not so good. Remember I an English professor, so I'm very aware of that. So Asians. We actually go after Asians in a positive way. But the larger point is what you're putting your finger on that it's not just the service academies, it's the military as a whole. Colon Powell, you recall, was an ROTC product. So what people don't know is that
fewer than one in five officers comes from the service academies these days. That's not the case when that was not the case when Roger Stylebach came through so and it was not the case up until World War Two. So in a sense, they've become much less relevant to our commissioning sources. At that's point number one. They also cost the taxpayers who are completely funding these places a
bundle about half a million dollars per kids. So the service academy is taken together cost about according to the figures that I've seen, about two and a half billion dollars a year. Now, that's less than an aircraft carrier. But the aircraft carrier is going to stay around for a few years. So taxpayers are funding these places for what they It just produces bad feelings on the part of the students. They all, I mean, I thought between three
and four thousand students. A lot of them come to my office, and you know, ostensibly they want to talk about their bad papers, so we talk about their bad paper, and then they open up and they're so disillusioned. I mean, you can't. You have no idea just how negative these places are for the students. But of course that's not what the administration projects at the outside world. No, let me share with the American people a
couple of your sentences, which I think explains it. You say, the US's military academies preach morality but exhibit none, and scandals abound, from constant cheating scandals among midshipmen to constant underage drinking, raunchy sex in the dormitories. You examine the lack of morality and the service academies duty, honor, and country. I can recall and I play it now. And then nineteen sixty four, the Damon Thayer Award was given to General Douglas MacArthur duty, honor
and country. I don't care if our military is completely black, completely white, completely fill being completely Indian. I don't care. What I care is to have a service academy producing the leaders to kill the nation's enemies and break things up. That's why they're there. It's not a welcome wagon socially. And so in the thirty some years, I guess, my gosh, you got like thirty six years into this deal. How has the academy changed at
Annapolis? From the time you started until today. All of these all of these things have gotten worse, and they've gotten worse because the relevance of the academies. I mean, you're invoking the glory days, and nobody respects that more than me. I mean, my heart goes thump thump when I think about that. Of course, free women and so on, they had it. They had their negative had its negative sides as well, But those were
the glory days of the academies. And then they've become irrelevant, partly for reasons I'm talking about. Before they just produced a much smaller percentage of the officers, and there's no there by, no metric are they any better? And you don't want them to be better because eighty two percent of the officers come from somewhere else, and you want all the naval officers to be good. So it's these three things that I say the culture wars have landed in
the service academies precisely because they've become less relevant. And that's that's what they're they're all about. Show I say that they're the vanity projects of the military brass and that's why they wanted to shut me down. I mean this the book is my it's partly a memoir, you know, it's my experience there. But I'm just you know, i'd say the Canary and the coal mine.
If they shut down the fact based objections to what they're doing inside of their own ranks, that me as a tenured professor, what are I know? I mean, I'm gonna say, I'm gonna put this as a question, but I know the answer. The question is what are they doing in the real service? And I know the answer because I talk to former students. They get people disastrous social engineering that is happening in the fleet is you
can't object to it. If you're a junior officer, you have to please the person who's one level above you, and of course the enlisted can't complain at all. Basically, it's a culture that's you know that, it's the culture awards of the three things that I mentioned that have changed the academies, but it's also their position in the world. And the result is what we're talking about. We can't, we can't, we shouldn't be in some of
these places. Of course it's the civilian. It's the civilians who send the military. But the military can talk back, and they're just not doing it. So it's a culture of pleasing your commanding officer, and if not, the commanding officer has a four sided fit, and the academy had a ten sided fit with me and continue to have. So that's what I want change, and that's what's going to have to change. That one's a big order, so I'm not sure how that's going to happen. It's more rationality,
it's more talking, it's more respectful descent. All of mine was respectful. It was articles written in the Washington Post, for example, the Christian Science monitor for the Federalists and so on, so you know, they ought to have been listening to me. This is my personal beef, obviously, and it was what's so frustrating, But you know, in the fleet, my equivalent is some grizzled, old and listed guy, some marine who's been a you know, some forward based prage as he knows what's going on. You're
a profile and courage. You remind me of the ethic and the duty, honor and country of people like Douglas MacArthur and individuals like that. You're not afraid to speak up. And at this point, God bless you. The book is saving our service academies. It's everywhere, and Professor once again the ethos of the ethics of someone like Roger Staubach. It doesn't exist so much anymore, it has said, but it's got to change. DEI is a
cancer and it spreads, It sells all over for political purposes. It should be based upon merit and not sex or not gender or not race. It should be based upon merit, and the Professor, we got to run. I'm gonna I'm gonna keep this and maybe in six months or so I'll give you another call to see if any anything changed, and Professor Fleming, Bruce Fleming, once again, thank you for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show. Thank you, Professor. Yes, sir, thank you, appreciate it.
Take care of keep going. God bless you. Allright, let's continue with Bill Cunningham, with you every Sunday Night, My Billy, Willie Brock You by Choice Hotels, Econo Lodge and Roadway In Hotels are serving up double points
for every qualifying stay book at Choice Hotels dot com. Now here's the man who's been recognized as radio's best, the recipient of not one but two prestigious Marconi Awards for his is broadcast Exodence, the one and only Bill cunning Billy Cunningham, the Great America and of course Scott Powell is one of the great thinkers in America today. He's a Senior Fellow at the Discovery Institute. He
has a timeless book out, Rediscovering America. Rediscovering America is the title in Goddesses That Needed Today, number one Amazon new release in the history genre for eight consecutive weeks. Still available, Rediscovering America. Scott Powell, Welcome again to the Bill Cunningham Show. A few days ago. You pend a column that's been a lot of places. I've seen it real Clear Politics. I've seen it on Newsmax entitled Americans can Defeat the Enemy sixteen point demolition plan in
twenty twenty four. When I speak and God, I'm positioned and a great way to hear from different viewpoints. There's a general feeling on both sides of the political aisle. Everywhere I turn, we have nothing but chaos. And that is if Trump is re elected, I can only imagine what the elites will do to him at that point, with the more indictments, more lawsuits,
It'll be completely chaotic. On the other hand, if Biden slash Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsoen Michelle Obama gets elected and we continue the policies that have been enacted the past several years, in that case, we have complete utter
chaos. So in Trump's part, we're gonna have chaos caused by the left with good governmental On the other hand, we're going to have the interchangeable drill bit the Democrat continuing Joe Biden's policies, which is why I much prefer a Donald Trump who has chaos all around him constantly, but his policies work as
opposed to the Democrats have chaos everywhere and their policies don't work. And there's been a sense, maybe I'm talking a little bit too much here, that that we're kind of slowly beginning a slide in American society for the reasons you point out in your column, and right now the last three years has been to collapse. Well, you begin by saying, what is difficult for many to understand is that America is being destroyed from within by elites in and out
of our government. So for those whose normalcy bias is strong, or those with the Tennessee and denial, let us review the components of internal demolition currently taking place inside the United States. And Scott Pale, number one of the demolition by the elites is the southern border. Number one open border policy.
Please explain to the American people, Well, on the border. You know, any nation needs to have borders, it needs to have people who have shared values and a shared history, because that's what makes up a nation. And when you don't have borders, you don't have a nation. So we
have two things going on. The open border policy is unlocked. The floodgates of what's known as replacement migration, which this idea comes out of the United Nations, by the way, and replacement migration displaces American citizens from access to
jobs, housing, healthcare, and schools. And these people are really at the lower the lower end of the economic you know, the economic spectrum in America because that that's you know, the the new people coming in are going to be taking jobs away from that, you know, the working class. Really. Secondly, we've had we've had a you know, an assault on
the foundational ideas that constitute that define us as Americans. Life, liberty, individual responsibility, uh, you know, the the ability you know, to own property and have it protected. And we've had decades of government, public school undermining these values and the media, media and doctrination as well. And so we're facing a frontal assault and subversion now from the cultural Marxist side and
a rewriting of the American past. And we can see that in the removal of all these wonderful monuments that are that define us who we are, where we've been. And you know, we don't we're not a perfect nation from the beginning, We've never been, but we're a we learn from our past, we learn from our mistakes and we make progress. That's always been the vision. That's the vision that most of us have for our own lives, that we want to make progress and we learn from our mistakes, and nations
do that too. And yet, and yet, the you know, the enemies of America want to destroy us. Why is there they? I mean, this is my question. Why. And many of them are internal to this country, Marxist, leftist progressives. They want to destroy our magnificent cities. They want to destroy law enforcement, they want to destroy the family life,
they want to destroy religion. What is the motivation? I can see Vladimir Putin cij oupaying, okay, but what is the motivation of the cloding gays and the the elites in Hollywood and Washington and Chicago, New York. What's the motivation to destroy the country from within? Why? Well, they don't really always know exactly what the vision is. But they're unhappy. These are largely very unhappy people. I mean, do you know a leftist no
who's happy. No, these people are unhappy, and rather than deal with themselves confronting the causes of their real unhappiness, their internal strife, they blame others. They blame the institutions of society, and you know, and that means they blame all of all the American institutions. So they they're at war with America because somehow they think that if we can bring this system down and replace it with another, that they'll be happier people. I mean, I
think that's a really short partial answer. Scott Powell's awful because in California, the governors providing medical free medical care for six hundred thousand illegals, taking the place of those who need medical care in California, jobs, housing, healthcare, schools, massive in migration. It's happening right now. And so you just look at the status of Chicago, New York City, Portland, Los Angeles, San Francisco. Just look at what's happened in the past twenty years.
No one objectively can look at that and say, man, we need more of those policies. We're going to bring those policies to Nashville. We've got to bring those policies all over the country. Let's go to two or three more of the components of the internal demolition happening. I really think that
that the core. You know, we've talked about these two things, but right behind them, and perhaps at the very top is the removal of religion and belief in God from the American schools and cultural institutions, and that vacuum gets replaced by secular progressive creeds, notably cultural Marxism. And this is brought about a society characterized by people of weaker individual character, and a society characterized by division and fraid social and political fabric. This is what Marxism in is
called class warfare. Marxism is constant class warfare. Who wants to live in a society with constant class conflict and warfare? No one does. And yet these people are using it as a sledgehammer to keep us divided, to keep to weaken America so that we ultimately fall. And then, you know, and we also look, we know that the ongoing sexual revolution really negatively affected
family formation and family life. You know, divorce rates has skyrocketed since the nineteenth reality has It's beyond that where we now have a normalization of transgenderism, which has brought about mass confusion among younger people, high suicide rates, and the undermining of women's sports. My gosh, don't women deserve to have sports? Yes, we're own sports. Where they're competing against each other. I
mean, this is insanity what we're doing to our institutions. You know, the recklessness of Title nine in the beginning was overcome and right now as the grandfather of a granddaughter, and I talked to Chris Collinsworth about this, and he is one hundred percent as I am for Title nine. Equal opportunities for women and girls. The crowd that champion Title nine is now telling us that men can play women's sports. That somehow completely flipped. Two issues I want
to get because your article, Scott pal is so good. Number fifteen, the reckless increase in US national debt escalates risk and makes America unsustainable and twenty oh three, But twenty twenty one years ago the US national debts too at three point nine trillion. Today it's thirty four trillion dollars. So in the last twenty years it's gone from thirty six percent of GDP to one hundred and
twenty three percent, an increase of seven hundred and seventy two percent. And this year, this fiscal will beginning October first, we're going to borrow another two trillion dollars that we don't have as far as we want to see. We don't have it. We got to print it, and by twenty thirty it's gonna be forty trillion dollars. This is funny money. How does that work? Yeah, well, let me paint the picture to the audience in
very simple terms. If you have no equity in your house. Let's say you had a you know, you had a large mortgage, but then the value of the property fails. You have no equity in your house. You've maxed out on your major credit card. It's maxed out, and you've got to service that credit card or you're gonna get four clothes. You're gonna have problems. So you take out a second credit card, you draw that down to pay the first credit card. This is where America is right now.
We are borrowing money to pray to pay the interest service on previously issued debt, and meanwhile we're growing the debt. You know, debt is growing at about eight and eight and a half percent a year. If you if you look at yes, they're ups and downs, but if you look at the trends over the last twenty years, last twenty three years, the growth rate of debt has been steady and sometimes more but it's an eight eight and a half percent growth rate. Meanwhile, our economy, which backs the debt our
GDP's back to debt, is growing at barely two percent a year. So you've got divergent paths of debt growth and economic growth. And ultimately this can't go on much longer. But what there will be a total loss of confidence in the US dollar, a collapse of our bond market. No one will buy our debt. Then what interest rates go to twenty percent? We're going
to take? We could have in America what has previously happened in other third world countries that borrow too much money, that print too much money, where their currency gets sharply devalued. Sure, that can happen absolutely. In fact, it happened in the number one industrial power in Europe. That was Germany. Why mart Germany had explosive inflation that destroyed the mark. How could that happen in the most advanced industrial nation in Europe? Well, it happened because
they printed a lot of money. And that's what America has been doing. Scott palitzmudl and two more that kind of related. I always viewed American soldiers, sailors, marines, and I always viewed cops as the guardians of our freedom to make sure we have the opportunity to pursue our dreams. And two of your fourteen points deal with number one the military. Right now, we
can't find the Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin. He was the guy who testified under oath that the two biggest problems in American military has today is number one is white supremacy and number two is climate change. We have to mitigate the impact of US military basis on climate change and white supremacy. That conducted
the year long investigation of the US military and found no white supremacy. In fact, they did find the great majority of soldiers that are killed and wounded in battle are white males, and they have no more white supremacists than you or I. Plus the issue of law enforcement cops. Young men, young women don't want to be cops and they're not joining the military. They're kind of related. Why are the Marxists encouraging this kind of an attitude of no
cops. Poor lady positioned the Mexican bakery and the la was rammed with a stolen vehicle, a ward of one and there's steel cakes, pies and donuts of a Mexican family bakery at four o'clock in the morning. Plus you have ten to twenty thousand per month not being enlisted and recruited in the military, because why form a group filled with all those white supremacists in the US Army. How are those two events related. Well, I think you've answered your
own question. Bill. The enemy wants to destroy law order and wants to destroy our military capability. So these institutions are being attacked from within, and we're seeing the result. We have chaos and urban America cities across the United States have escalated crime rates, and as you point out, we have a shortfall of recruits enlisting in the military, and this is a serious problem.
I was talking to a military family just a couple of weeks ago, and their son, who's serving in the Navy, was home and he just candidly said, you know, the good people are leaving and the not so good performers the lower end stay and they get promoted. So basically what he was saying was that the officer corps that's getting promoted are not the best and the brightest. Fact, we have a deficiency of leadership in the military. Look,
look at Lloyd Austin. He's what kind of an example is he's very overweight, and he violates the fundamental rule of keeping a chain of command in place. You know, when you might have to be away, you've got
someone covering for you. I mean, he violated the fundamental tenet, just as Milly did when he went over in the interim peer between the election of twenty twenty and the inauguration of Joe Biden, there's you know, almost a couple of well there is, there's a couple of months or more space there. Milli calls his Chinese counterpart and says, look, well, we'll keep our eye on Trump in case he does anything unusual. You know he might
you know, since he's been elected. You know there's rumors that he may want to have a coupd atan. Stay in the White House, and we'll alert you if there's any any threat to China. This was a fundamental of the constitution, Scott Powell. He said to his counterpart, the chairman of the Chinese Chief of Staff, Look, I'm going to tell you our military plans ahead of time. If they arise and isn't to me, that's treason.
So you got Milli the chairman of the Joint Chiefs communicating with his counterpart in Beijing, talking about American military plans. And you got Lloyd Austin that's got the weigh three hundred and fifty pounds, who's got awol for five or six days. Then you got Joe Biden stumbling off the stage in Valley Forge in South Carolina. His wife, doctor Jill. He's got to take him by the arm to help him get off stage, and then a Secret Service
agent has to help him get in the beast. That's our military leadership. We have fifteen minutes from an ICBM launched to hitting in ames Iowa, right in the middle of the country, and you have in the chain of command, you got the Secretary of Defense who is awol, and even Democrats are now calling for his investigation or resignation. And we can't have that. Scott pal't know what to say. I've scratched the surface of your article. It's
it's everywhere so well. I closed the article by reminding the people, and I'll remind the audience that we who are common sense people, believing in God and believing that there is right and wrong, and good and evil, we far out number these elitists, you know, who want to transform society,
want to break America down. We far outnumber them. So we've got to, you know, we've got to push back and rediscover uh, you know the importance of being involved in your you know, in in our future of our country and our locality, in our national We got to get out the vote, and we have to ensure we have honest elections. We need to we need to volunteer and find and rediscover the joy of serving other people. I mean, that's what makes us different. Great point, and I tell
you, well, let's keep the lines of communication and open. This country's worth saving. We must be like William of Wallace and braveheart yelling about freedom. Take out my guts, but I will remain faithful. We got to be American patriots and warrior poets. Scott Powell up against the clock once again, Thank you for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show. Great column. I'd encourage the American people to get it. And the book, of course is
rediscovering America. Scott Powell. We got to run, but thank you again for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show. Thank you, Thank you, Bill, thank you for your patriotism. God bless you. I let's continue with more. The line becomes available eight sixty six six four seven, seven three three seven Bill Cunningham, The Grand American, With you Live Every Sunday Night by Bill Cunningham. If you want to read the column of Scott Powell,
it's a Newsmax and a bunch a bunch of other locations. The headline is you bet Americans can defeat the enemy sixteen point demolition plan in twenty twenty four. We cannot survive four to eight more years after November of the Marxist Democratic progessior policies of Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden doesn't know what he's doing. Michelle Obama donet work. We can't function. The country's done, and that Colin by Scott Powe lays it out fairly well. Bill Cunningham,
with you Every Sunday, Jill Cunningham, The Great American. Of course, we know what's happening with the Donald Donald Trump. He's been ordered off the ballot, so to speak, by two states at this point, which is Colorado and the state of Maine. There are several other states wanting to do exactly the same thing. Waiting for a Supreme Court decision. Argument's going to
be around February of the eighth. Plus there's other actions taking place in all the states, some by Republican governors and Republican attorney generals and Republican secretaries of State debar Joe Biden from the ballot because he's giving aid and cofering to the enemy, which is one of the reasons in the fourteenth Amendment that someone cannot stand for election. Of course, the argument ought to be I've thought the Democrats cared so much about democracy, you know, it's all about democracy.
Democracy is on the ballot. Well, the Democrats are working hard to make sure that the leading presidential candidate of the Republican Party will not be on the ballot. They've thrown everything at them from the beginning to the end, civil lawsuits and negative media coverage for months and years. They've thrown ninety one count indictment, and none of it worked. In fact, it's boomerang the opposite direction. One poll in Michigan came out over the weekend that had the Donald
up nine points over Joe Biden in Michigan. And if that's the case, not even close to being the case, then Trump's going to have a second term. So it's ugly, but one thing we ought to do is believe in democracy. Let candidates run, let them make their cases, and all of us we'll have a rightfully elected president. Well, according to Michael Letz, Michael Letz has been with us a few times. He's a law enforcement
veteran with over thirty years of experience under his belt. He's president, founder and CEO of an Invest USA, an organization that provides bulletproof vest for police officers so badly needed. Michael. Lets welcome again to the Bill Cunningham Show. And Michael Letz, can you tell me make a little bit of an argument, just as an American, why Donald Trump deserves to be on all fifty state ballots plus Washington DC, which he can't win. Well, thank
you, Bill. It's always approved to be on your show, and I appreciate the opportunity. But this particular issue is extremely important to every American, whether you agree don't agree with Donald Trump, whether you like him or you don't. And here's the crux of the reason why this is such a crucial matter. What they have done, Bill is to say that the president cannot be on the ballot because he is guilty of insurrection via the fourteenth Amendment.
The only problem with that statement, Bill is he's never even been indicted for insurrection, much less tried by a jury of his peers and convicted. So here's why it is important to you. Democrat, liberal, makes no difference. Hugh's listening to our voice right now. This is why it's urgent for
you be working to what's going on. If we have changed the basic fundamental law in this country for the last two hundred and fifty years of jurisprudence that you are innocent to approven guilty, and now we have taken the point you are guilty and don't even have to have a jury argument a diety. We could just say that we don't like what you did, and automatically you suffer the consequences of whatever that action can be. We are worse than a dictatorship
in a tyranny. That is the ultimate abuse of power. And that is why either of the Supreme Court. Of course, you're seeing a number of states twenty nine stays. I believe it is so far now that are coming out to support the Supreme important hearing this case and to make sure this does not happen because of just what you said earlier. It's actually about eighteen states that are considering keeping them off the balid. Of course, you know what's
turned around a spare of play. If they want to do that, then we could just say that we paid. Joe Biden is guilty treason, No need to and diet. He don't need to have a jury convincing of that. We just think he's guilty of treason. He's automactly barred as well from the valot. So you can see the hypocrisy and the total that idiocyes in this kind of thinking and how it has to be sought but unfortunately built.
This is par for the liberal democratic left wing ideology. They don't have any sense, common sense, or any other kind of sense anymore, but they just do things that are totally irrational. Michael Letts, I would say this. I spoke to someone connected to the Trump campaign for the presidency, and I made their point that how is the Donald doing? How's he physically?
The man is almost seventy eight years old, He's facing the rest of his life in prison, He's facing the bankruptcy of his prize properties in New York City, New York State. He's looking at an addition to that, five hundred or so different lawsuits where various entities all over the country are suing. Parts are all of the Trump business and the Trump enterprises. And so I can't imagine to be seventy eight years old to look that they want to put
him in prison for the rest of his life. They want to give him life in prison. And Donald Trump, they want him locked up, and they want him bankrupt. And the party doing this is New York City politics, Atlanta, Fulton County politics. And I'm a prosecutor has some serious difficulties over own ethically. We may talk about that, plus Washington DC. And so I've made the point. And you're in law enforcement. I've been in a attorney for many decades, tried many cases, twenty five murder cases for
example. And justice is the judge, and justice is the jury. And so whether it will be reversed on appeal, if he actually gets a criminal case in front of a New York City jury or an Atlanta jury or a Washington DC jury, he will be convicted almost irrespective of the facts, because
that's what juries do to Trump and Republicans. Would you agree that it would be inherently disgustingly unfair to have Donald Trump go to trial before November the fifth, the election, when so much is at stake on the southern border and Ukraine and Israel, what's happening with the military, that it would be ridiculous for the American people to have no choice for the presidency but Joe Biden and to say to Donald Trump, You're a convicted felon, and at some point
he's going to have to face a jury, probably in something maybe a civil aspect. He committed no crime that is recognizable by the criminal statutes, as judged by the behavior of the Clintons, Obama and Biden themselves, they've done worse things with and got a Texas l passo. Does he have a chance of being found not guilty before a jury in Washington, d C. No, Absolutely right, You hit the nail on the hand bill. It leads to a bigger issue, which is one I have been talking about for a
number of months now. We have unfortunately gotten to the point in this country, but we are so weaponized to politicize the not just federal agencies, but the judicial system that the only way I can see a positive alcohol of is before we have this, before the lessons, you're going to have to move to military to oribunal and have military interventions. Really so you're saying out, call out the US Army at some point, Well, here's how it works,
very very simple. You know, the Constitution provides for military tribunals. War Powers Act does the same thing. The Constitution that has a military tribunal called by the Commander in chief or you know, Joe's not going to do it on himself, but the War Powers Act allows Congress, beginning in the House of Representatives, with the Speaker of the House, to do call together
military tribunal. Military tribunals are very specific. You can only utilize it for a few key things when you're talking about military personnel, when you're talking about
citizens. One of those is a compromise or of national security. I can think of no greater case than the open borders bringing terris in and allowing the destruction of our border system to threaten every American citizen as being an issue for our views of national security to direct violation of what the Constitution requires if we provide protection for our people. I think a military trib unial needs to be
held to hold those that have that responsibility. President, the vice president never sees the borders are Homeland Security Directory and others to be held to try by a military tried noodle. You know, a tried military tribbudal has to complete his job within thirty days. Right. And here's the issue with the military tribunal. They don't say, oh, be able to think you're guilty. Now we're gonna send it over the Department Justice put an attack on it.
Nope. Military from the start to finish, they determine whether you are guilty with junior officers, no military, not senior officers or a political appoint it's all doing the great officers to sit on those military tributals. They make that determination. They determined yes, you bye the law, the losses. Here's the bility court, and we're going to quality with the pildy and discuss.
I'll say this, Michael Letts, we have chaos everywhere I look. If Trump is September and October, if he's not locked up, which is a possibility because who knows if he's convicted in a jury that the judge is not going to lock him up immediately, which would be utterly ridiculous. It'd be
a crisis. But we have chaos in this country. If Trump appears to be heading toward the presidency in September, in October, I don't know what the elite media would do or what the Democratic Party Department of Justice would do. Right now, he's being prosecuted by left wing far radical extremists and like Fanny Willison Fulton County, and also by Braggs in New York City and Smith part of the US Department of Justice. And by the way, his appointment
may be illegal. So on one hand, we have complete utter chaos. So if Trump wins, we're going to have chaos. He's got the right policies, those are going to work, but the next four years is going to be one hell of a ride. Secondly, if Joe Biden slash Kamala Harris slash Gavin Newsom slash Michelle Obama, if they win the presidency and they continue November fifth of this year, the same policies that Joe Biden had the past three years. We have wide open borders. We borrowed two trillion dollars
a year. Either that or we printed up American military prestige is in the toilet count it. Get out your crystal ball, Michael Letz. And let's say the Democrat wins in November and we have the same policies for the next four years beginning in November. What kind of condition are we in. Well,
here's where we're at. And that's what I'm trying to compare the American people for either way you cut it, or you said twelve guts to selected, or whether the Democrats gain take control, we're going to have that military and goal. And what does that mean, people are stated does not mean martial law. It means a very limited rule. But if you have the
Democrats, we cannot survive those policies. In every veteran and every service member and every law enforcement officer because we take the same goals stated on oath to defend and uphold the Constitution will have to rise up and sure that that obligation is fulfilled regardless of who is behind the administrations. You know, if Trump takes it. Here's why we are still using the same analogy. The only
way to get control of the security for this culture. We have over ten lay illegal family granting in this country that we have no idea what their background is. We know thousands of more au materist watches. We know that for a fact, the only way we're going to be able to get security this country, we're going to have to round up every illegal immigrant. You know, the mantire, the logistics is necessary to do that. At the time of matter Bill, the only people that can do that will be the Mistrey.
They need to be held accountable for their actions. Only the military could use them. And now, lastly, Michael lets on one other issue, I've noticed that the recruitment goals of the military are down by like ten to fifteen thousand per month. More and more of those in the military are leaving the service. Secondly, police office all over the country are under a vicious attack physically by the news media, by Antifa, by Black Lives Matter,
by liberal Democrats all over the place. I'll give you a kind of a sad example. I live in Cincinnati, Ohio, and one of my guests and Cincinnati repeatedly have been Sergeant Dan Hills, who spent thirty five years in law enforcement. And I said to Sergeant Dan a few months ago, would you advise a young person? In fact, I said to him, you have a son that age appropriate. Would you advise him to become a police
officer in this environment. And Sergeant Dan Hills said to me, you know what, when I took the test in order to become a cop, it was at the Duke Energy Center and there was three thousand people vying for thirty spots in the recruit class. Three thousand. He said, now we can't get two or three hundred, and most of them can pass the drug screen or they're physically not able to do the job. And he said no,
and he almost had a tear in his eye. Michael Letz and he said, you know what I would tell my son, do not get into law enforcement. And how many Americans are saying I'm not getting into the military because I got TikTok videos and YouTube videos I got to create, I got to look at. I want to be an influencer. And so just just step back a little bit. When Americans do not want to become cops or soldiers, what does that say about our great country? Tells you that our countries
are a bird are destruction And I use that word on a bird. I do believe we have one more opportunity, but this is the year, you know, we will either go forward as a great nation, or we will be listed in the history panels as a nation hotel. Pretty what happened this year because we can't keep borrowing six billion dollars every day in brand new money
to pay for social welfare spending. In California, medical can not afford six hundred thousand illegal aliens to be part of their medical system because you won't have medical care for the rest of You can't have a school system in Chicago and Detroit that is nothing but daycare, that's all it is. And you can't have teachers that are knocked out and disrespected and people do not how about this. Teachers, cops, and soldiers kind of like the foundation of this country.
And now I'm being told that you can't fill hundreds of teaching positions. There's a collapse of public education. I'm being told that the military is short ten to twenty thousand a month in recruitment. I'm told that law enforcement guys like you simply don't want to serve because of a lack of support. And I saw in the news this morning on one of the shows that San Francisco is offering one hundred and ten thousand dollars for recruits to become police officers in
San Francisco one hundred and ten thousand dollars. Now, I'm not like this, and they don't have people getting the job. Michael left. He's horrible, but unfamiliar with all those things. That's why I so appreciate your shill and what you're doing. The time to act is now. We don't get a second chance to do it, all right, We got to run. Do you have a website to where I can send people? Please ww dot I n V E S T USA dot org dot org. It's a charity
or Restoring Justice dot us. Both of those have everything on there you need to do to help get engaged and make this country free. Once again, Michael letz L E T T S. Michael, lets, once again thank you for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show. And let's pray to God the Supreme Court intervenes at some point wipe away the impediments and let Donald Trump run
for the presidency again. Then we can decide who our president is not the Democratic Party in New York City. And once again, Michael, lets thank you very much for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show and let's do it again. Thank you, thank you, Gods and God bless America. Let's continue with more if the line becomes available. Eight sixty six six four seven seven three three seven Bill Cunningham, the Great American Live with you every Sunday night.
Billy Cunningham, thanks for listening. And by the way, one little side note. I'm watching CNN earlier today, which I seldom do. I do so you don't have to. And they relate to the fact that weather is different than climate. That because it's cold everywhere. I'm broadcasting tonight from southwest Florida, and guess what it's like, forty nine degrees it's cold everywhere. But we're told now that climate has nothing to do with weather, and
weather is not climate. When it's real hot, guess what that is, indication of global warming. But when it's real cold, blizzard like conditions. Once again, don't assume that has anything to do with global warming. It's simply an anomaly. If it's wet, it's global warming. When it's dry, it's global warming. When it's cold, bitter is global warming. When it's hot, it's global warming. Whatever the question is is global warming.
And meteorologists that can't predict the weather next week is telling us in seventy five years, what's going to go on? Don't believe it. Thanks for listening, and please, if you live in Iowa, vote early and vote often for Donald Trump. Bill Cunningham, the Great American with you on this bitterly cold Sunday night. What if you could build a six figure retirement income with
almost half the money saved? You heard that right, Get a discount on your retirement creating a six figure income with forty percent less than traditional four to one case of mutual