Willie the Ball brought you by Choice Hotels, a conor rogen roadway in hotels are serving up double points for every qualifying stay book at Choice.
Hotels dot com.
Now here's the man who's been recognized as radio's best, the recipient of not one, but two prestigious Marconi Awards for his broadcast excellence, the one and only Bill Cunningham.
Bye, Billy cunning Had the Great America, And welcome to Sunday Night. And I tell you what all kinds of stuff's happening watching the morning talk shows, you would think that a country is in a complete constitutional crisis. I have some information to give to you about those Venezuelan gangs and all hell's going to break loose tomorrow, Monday and Tuesday because the judge who issued this so called
tro is going to be all upset. And the Democrats tonight on some of the podcasts are saying exactly the same thing that the President Trump has caused a constitutional crisis. How many times have you heard that? But I think we've planned a night, a tremendous show. We have congressmen, we have individuals on They're going to talk about the problems on their college campuses we have. Julie Gunlock will be here and so many others. But until then, let's
kind of set this up. The mainstream media does not control much of what the American people think and say anymore, and rather twenty sixteen twenty twenty had a little bit of power, but in twenty twenty four it's not the case. There might be one or two newspapers in America worth a pail of a warm spit great majority or not, they're going out of business because there's not readers.
Throw on top of that.
ABC, NBCCBSPBS soon will be shut down completely. And two of the ver remain anchors are gone. The only one left is left is David Muir. The Leicster hold has gone, Laura Donald's gone, and so many on the cable shows are being fired like Jolie's Read, etc. And the View will be done within the next one or two months. They're gone. And so where do you get your information? If you can't rely upon truthfulness and objectivity in the newspapers or on NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS can't rely upon that,
where do you get information? Well, it's from blogs, it's from talk radio, it's all kinds of alternative purposes because the mainstream media has lost credibility. That's why talk radio
is in the ascendency. In fact, I was told by Sean McMahon, my executive producer with Danny Gleeson, that we presently have about five hundred and fifty affiliates on Sunday Night, not as many as the Great Sean Hannity, but we're getting there because on Sunday Night, there's truckers, there's moms and dads, husbands and wives, there's single men and women that want to get some information, to get the truth from newsmakers, lie upon what's going to happen on the
nightly news or the morning shows. If you watch the Today Show or Good Morning America, all of it is about cooking and arranging flowers. They deal with politics infrequently because people don't want to listen.
For that kind of stuff.
And so the reason we have so many hundreds of affiliates because I put on the newsmakers and put on those who you can form your own opinion without being forged by people like George Stephanopolis or people like Joy Reid. For God's sake, you got to be kidding me. Those media outlets are dying rapidly, and what's remaining is going to be podcast and talk radio, which is why you and I getting together a large band of renegades. It used to be a small band of renegades, not so
small anymore. It's because you don't trust the mainstream media because you don't tell you the truth. They don't tell you the truth because they are leftists and they have a defined person purpose. Kristin Welker this morning on Meet the Press was embarrassing because the fact of the matter is, I'll give you two facts. Donald Trump's policies extremely popular with the American people. Is that something you get from
the mainstream media. In fact, in one poll that fifty eight percent support what's happening with those which is cutting back the strength of the bureaucracy in the federal government fifty eight percent. And as far as Donald Trump's policies, there are a lot more popular than than the Democratic policies. As far as an approval rating, it's kind of low for Donald Trump, which is forty five percent, but the
approval rating for Democrats is twenty one percent. So when you talk to average Americans, they're saying, look what he's trying to do needs to be done?
Can you only imagine if.
Kamala Harris had won the presidency in about two or three weeks ago when they had the joint session, you had Kamala Harris as the president, and over her shoulder was Tim Waltz, the marshmallow man is the Vice President and also President of the Senate, and next to him would have been a Keen Jeffers. What would what would be the status of the country at that point? My God, are we in trouble? And right now we have a chance of a lifetime and a lifetime of chance to
change the direction of this country for the better. Because we can't keep borrowing two trillion dollars every year in twenty nineteen. The population between twenty nineteen and twenty twenty four one up two percent, federal spending one up forty five percent, two percent population growth forty five percent more federal spending, with hundreds of thousands of new employees to
administer the programs, we can't survive. It's impossible. At some point on the ten year note, foreign entities are going to quit buying it, demanding more interest, and we're out of business. We have to declare bankruptcy. And America cannot declare bankruptcy. It doesn't work that way, so we are in dire straits. The way to correct this is to incentivize working Americans to take more risks for more businesses and pay more in taxes. It's called immodest tax cut.
The top one percent, like my producer Sean Sean McMahon, top one percent pay about forty percent of the taxes. The top five percent pay about seventy percent of the taxes. So we have a system that disincentivizes work and rewards those who don't want to work, and that's got to stop. The only hope we have is Donald Trump. His policies, despite their protestations of CNN MSNBC, are very popular with
the American people. Now, the stock market is going down because we've been living on borrow time for the last five years. The bridge between the so called pandemic of COVID to today was about four point five trillion dollars of new spending that took the place of productivity, and so the bridge has now collapsed. No more spending of that character is going to happen again. We may go through a three to six month period of falling prices in the stock market as the world adjusts to a
new sheriff being in town. That sheriff is Donald Trump. And as I've said last Sunday night when I was with you, if we go back and forth from Obama and then Trump and then Biden and then Trump and then what Gavin Newsom or Pritzker or god forbid, Kamala Harris, We're going to go back the other direction, and we can't survive that way. The popularity of the Democrats is twenty one percent. The popularity of President Trump is forty
five percent. His policies are extremely successful. In fact, the CNN, the poll headlined by CNN not exactly a friend of Donald Trump. Democratic Party favorability sinks to an historic low. Almost no one cares about the Democratic Party anymore, says CNN. That is the outcome delivered by a poor release Sunday, and that shows the party's favorability rating among Americas is sunk to an historic low. It can't go much lower
than twenty one percent. And so all In and I have other pulling indicates how popular Donald Trump is right now with the average American, despite the fact the stock market is down and the market will go back up in some three to six months. The only person on people on the roller coaster to get hurt are those who jump off and stick with the president.
We're going to be fine.
However, you're speaking, or shall I say, you're listening to a great American who sleeps with it every night. I've been married to the same woman for over fifty years. She was a judge for thirty years. I was a federal law clerk to a district court judge. I was a bailiff in state court trials. I've been an attorney general. You're listening to someone that is great respect for judges. I love judges. They're wonderful. However, there are a few judges that are completely out of whack and want to
have foreign policy as part of their judgeship. We have a problem with judges. In fact, there is I'm going to have a congressman on a bit later on. It's going to talk about maybe filing a bill of impeachment about certain judges. This is what happened. You may know there's a terrorist group domestic enemies headquartered in America, but foreign domestic enemies called TDA, which is a which is a Venezuelan gang of thousands infiltrated into this country to
commit burglaries, rape, robbery, murder, and mayhem. There's thousands in the country, and so what happened is a little birdie gave me this update on the information on Saturday, I'm sorry.
On Friday night.
Friday night, President Trump invoked that seventeen to ninety eight Alien Enemies Act against members of the Violent Venezuelan Gang trend DERAY, which is also VTDA, and promptly put over two hundred of them on a plane to go to Al Salvador. In fact, we worked out a deal the administration to pay the Salvadorans to house two hundred and thirty seven Salvadoran gang bangers indirectly through Venezuela to stay
in those prisons. While the flight was in the air, Chief Judge James Boseburg, who's a leftist appointed by Obama, ordered a tro preventing the deportation of quote any Venezuelans, and also demanded that the plane turn around and returned the gangsters to the United States. Now this all developed because the President wanted to keep somewhat quiet about what he was doing, fearing exactly what would occur, which is the ACLU would run to a federal court in Washington.
So what happened next? This is last night. The Trump administration ignored the federal order, however, and the gang bangers were unloaded Sunday a few hours ago in El Salvador, where the president there has agreed to incarcerate them for a fee. We're paying them to them a lot of money. To us, it's a little or no money. And according to L Salvador today, the first two hundred and thirty eight members of a Venezuelan criminal organization arrived in our country.
They were transferred to Seacott, the Terrorism confinement Center for a period of one year, renewable every year by meat. The leader of L Salvador said, the US will pay very low fee for them, but it's a high fee for us. I'm told us about six million dollars a month. Six million dollars a month. So listening tonight, watching some of the blogs, the left is going nuts as another constitutional crisis. Now, how did the administration justify not complying
with a court order? Were number one, the quart or had not been jeneralized. The judge, who was a leftist judge said from the bench what he wanted, but it wasn't journalized and there was reduced to writing yet and they're freaking out because they're calling it now a constitutional crisis and possibly onset of a civil war, to quote the Maxine Waters. White House advisor Stephen Miller said tonight the order did not apply because the flight was over
international waters. From reading the order, here we go the timeline. The President signed the executive order invoking the Alien Enemies Act late Friday night, but intentionally didn't not advertise it, do a news conference, issue a press release, which by they doesn't have to do. On Saturday morning, someone in the Trump White House or elsewhere leaked word of the order that Venezuelan gang members were being flown to a Salvador two hundred and thirty six, and there's a mad
scramble to get them on the plane. So the Trumpster and Steve Miller said, we better get them on the plane and get them out of jurisdictional waters before a federal judge is going to stop it, because we think they will. At two point thirty one PM, a little birdie told me an immigration activist who tracks deportation flights posted on x quote, two highly unusual ice flights were departing from Texas to O Salvador, which had agreed to
accept the Venezuelan gang members deported from the US. Hours later, during a court hearing late on Saturday filed by the ACLU, federal Judge Boseburg, an Obama appointee. He's an anti Trump. Judge, Bozburg ordered a halt through the deportations and said any flights should be turned around in mid air. And he said, quote, this is something you need to make sure is complied with immediately, he told the Department of Justice late Saturday night.
At that point, about seven fifty one pm, both flights were off the Yucatan peninsula, according to flight paths posted on next, so they left Euro's jurisdiction by hundreds of miles. The report concludes. The White House considered ordering the planes to turn around, but White House Council said don't do it. Officials discussed whether to order the planes to turn around over the yucatr Yucadan on advice from a team of administration lawyers, the administration pressed ahead.
Quote.
There was a discussion about how far the judge's ruling could go in the circumstances because they were over international waters. On advice a council, we proceeded with deporting these thugs. They were already outside of US airspace.
We believe the lorder is not applicate. The order is not applicable, and it's moot.
So that's according to sources I have in the administration, that they left the airspace. And the judge that did this was one of the most liberal judges in Washington. His name is Bosberg and he's appointed by Obama about eighteen years ago. Administration did not follow a federal judges order, and the left right now tonight is having a conniption fit.
The rationale may hold up in court, but expect their less screeching until then, and no one has to apologize to get these two hundred and thirty six killers and human traffickers and rapists and burglars out of America.
The issue is going to become how was it done?
So?
Have judges overreached what they can do? How many times?
There's been sixty to seventy lawsuits filed already trying to stop what Donald Trump wants to do. The US Constitution, as you may know, is built on a system of separation of powers, ensuring that each branch of government, led slave, executive, and judicial, operates within its own clearly defined bounds. Donald Trump cannot hire and fire employees of the US Supreme Court. Donald Trump cannot hire and fire employees of the Congress.
The President is granted the sole authority in the Constitution to perform the executive function. In recent years, there have been many activist judges repeatedly interfering with executive decisions. Let me share with you with what the Constitution says, which is Article two, Section one, Constitution states, quote the executive power shall be vested in a president of the United States of America, quote unquote. This is not an ambiguous statement.
It makes clear that the executive function of this country resides with the president, not the Congress, and not the courts, not to unelected federal bureaucrats. How many unelected federal bureaucrats did Biden use in order to impose the restrictions on us when it came.
To COVID and all.
So, according to the auto Pen, we did not have a federal US president for about three of those four years. We had an auto pen doing his job for him. So At this point, the executive power has the authority
to hire and fire federal employees. As the head of the executive branch, Trump is responsible for ensuring that federal employees work, do a good job, etc. The President has no more power to tell congressional employees you're fired than the Congress has the power to tell the President that those under the branch of the executive branch you have
to keep them employed. There have been numerous circumstances in the last two or three weeks in which federal judges have ordered Donald Trump to spend money on programs he wants to cut. He's also been told mandating policy implementation, denying the dismissal of federal employees, enforcing the executive to
fund programs that don't work. So at some point, I hope thing gets to the US Supreme Court, and I hope that Amy Cony Barrett has moments of lucidity and will rule basically their Article two, Section one, the power, the executive power of the United States rests within the hands of Donald Trump. Well, let's continue big show planned tonight.
Lot's going on the line becomes available eight six six six four seven seven three three seven, I'll set up tonight's big show with you in a few minutes, Bill Cunningham, the Great American, and I want to welcome five hundred and fifty delegates, five hundred and fifty syndicated radio stations and others tonight with us. It's unbelievable. We are winning and the left is losing. Bill Cunningham with you every Sunday night.
Billy Cunningham, the.
Great American, ILL tell you what the president needs to be the president judges need to be judges, and Congressional Senate and House members need to stay within their borders. And the president conducts foreign affairs foreign relations and declare certain organizations as criminal aliens in this country for bad purposes. He has to have the power to get rid of them and not have thousands of separate trials going on. That would be chaos. Each of them need to stay
in their lane. But tonight all hell's breaking loose because there's a constitutional crisis development. But we'll see what happens. But later on we have Professor John Ellis is going to be here to talk about what's happening on college campuses and things in that character. And also later on as the Great Leland Vitters of News Nation to talk about some of the decisions that Trump has made, and I don't always agree with Leland Viverter, but we'll have
a spirited debate. One thing I think the president's wrong about is having Canada the fifty first state. If Canada was the fifty first state, Canada, by the way, is to the left of California. Politically, that means Canada would have fifty seven electoral votes. We wouldn't elect a Republican president for the rest of the century. Plus they would get an additional fifty two members of the House and two new Senators. The electoral college would be so tilted
a Republican could not get elected. I think the trumpter should leave that one alone. Talk about reciprocity of tariffs, because heaven, Canada coming into this country would ensure that for the rest of my lifetime, we would not elect a Republican president because that's fifty seven electoral votes that automatically would go in the column.
Of the Democrats.
Let's continue with more Aline becomes available eight six six six, four seven, seven three three seven. Professor John Ellis next year, Bill Cunningham with you, Billy Cunningham, The Great America.
Good to have you with me.
And at this point, the Trump administration is reversing the racism and tribalism that was part of the Biden administration, in fact part of Obama. Going back as long as we can remember, at least in my life, we've had nothing but either affirmative action, critical race theory, or DEI, which is proliferating throughout America. And when these young adults come out of college, they're ready to implement their ideas
across corporate America and across the government. That is that being of a certain race or a certain sexual orientation, either as a benefit or a cost. And these immutable traits generally are perceived as not being particularly relevant when it comes to merit. But that's not the way that we're being organized, Jon, and you and I Alis Professor
John Ellis. Professor John Ellis has written several books, one of which his critical Race Theory is an inversion of history, and he's author also the author of a Short History of Relations between Peoples and Professor John Ellis, Welcome to the Bill Cunningham Show. Professor. First of all, I've read the article in the Wall Street Journal, which is fabulous and you begin by saying attribute a sourts to critical race theory success, that the Trump administration will make its
af ratification a priority. Describe what America was beginning I guess about a month and a half ago when Trump took office. How many years as CRT and DEO percolated into the groundwater. I note, I wouldn't note that at the at the Oscars, you can't be qualified even to be considered for a movie to get some Oscar award if you're not CRT and DEI compliant. So there were one hundred and twenty movies that were not screened as possible getting the best picture because it didn't have enough
gay people, or disabled people, or persons of color. First of all, described to the American people before Trump office, what is the status of DEI and CRT in America as of about a month or two ago.
Well, as of that, before Trump started to get it under control, it had really risen to the point where it had, you know, it's had the whole society by the throats. I mean, government agencies were in the group of DEI advocates, all the universities, of course, I mean they're totally devoted to a DEI t I really, I mean most of the acuity inclusion. This was really originally a way of getting around the ban on affirmative action, right,
And for example, California banned affirmative action. I mean that's they banned the process of considering skin color as a qualification for employment. It banned that nineteen ninety six. Now ever since then the universities have been trying to think of ways to get around it, and this fancy title diversity equity inclusion was in fact their main way of doing it. So it kind of inflated the whole thing with fell out of fancy terminology at a lot of
complexity and so on. But it was just as illegal. It's the same idea, but actually the whole society had been almost taken over by it. I mean, our schools, our universities are training for the professions. Like, for example, if you wanted to be a journalist, you can bet that every journalism school on every campus of every universe was going to give you a big dose of DEI.
In your training.
Same thing for lawyers, same thing for almost So it had really got our society by the throat. And as soon as Trump came into office, you just started to ban the whole thing. And most of the citizens of this country bred decribed relief because no one likes it except these people that have managed to take over, uh, the universities, They've taken over uh, you know, corporate boards, they've taken over professional associations, you've taken over non governmental organizations.
And when that happens, it like in California, even the most left ring of the states, they've been two ballots on on these ideas, both of them our side, one handsomely. I mean so even in the most left wing state in the country, d I goes down if you put it on the ballot. So what these people do is they work stealthily. They get hold of corporate boards, they get hold of professional associations, so behind closed doors they
managed to get their ideas into place. They work secretly, and they you know, they twist arms everywhere, and before you know it, the whole society has been, you know, infiltrated with this stuff.
And you know, you know, professor, God help you. I'm a straight white male and I'm happy with that status. And I would note that the Wall Street Journalist said in other stories and that there's about a seven billion dollar industry wrapped around DEI and critical race theory. That is, those who make money out of this are going to fight like warrior poets to make sure it continues. And it begins merely as a first grader or second grader or third grader by the time you go through twelve
to fifteen years of education. I'm a lawyer, you go through that. I was in school directly or indirectly until I was like twenty five, twenty six years old, during a time where merit was a big deal, and I can recall the Baki decision in which the Supreme Court ruled thirty years ago. Before that, twenty years before that, you can't use race when determining whether someone gets hired or fired or whatever, because that is shall we say, racism itself. But the left has turned this idea on
its head. If you don't believe in racial selections, then you're the racist. You say in your story, the accusations made in closed training sessions are astonishingly venomous. Arrogant white supremacy is ubiquitous. White rage results when that supremacy is challenged. Whites hold money in power because they stole it from other racists. Systematic racism and capitalism keep the injustices going more so they turn the argument on you and me and other people would think, wait a minute, race should
not count. That we're the racist when we say we shouldn't be racist, But they're the racist because they say it does count. I say it doesn't count. They say it it does count. Where in hell and twenty years from now, where we're going to be at this continues. Let's talk about the Trump presidency. If he's not successful and this continues, we're in trouble. I think we're in trouble now.
Oh yeah, we're in big trouble because, let's face it, I mean, the merit principle is a way of getting talent into the place where it can do the most good. So basically, it's like Adam Smith's unseen hand. You know, the unseen hand for Adam Smith was the free market got material and goods into the place where they mattered most at the right time. Well, this is the same with the merit principle. It gets the right people into the right place at the right time to do the
most good for all of us. And the result of that is, of course, you have a very prosperous society because all the talent you have available is exploited to the best possible extent for the good of everybody. Once you start to stop doing that stomp putting your best talent in the in the right place at the right time, you're going to reduce the efficiency of society. Right, your whole society is given less happy, it's going to be less prosperous. It's going to be it's gonna be divided racially.
This could be business. Yeah, yes, it's a horrible outcome.
Horrible.
Let's go back in the history. You're an historian, Professor John Ellis. I can recall that America in England where the first two countries that banned the importation of slaves. This goes back to, you know, back to that the fifteen nineteen project, which America did not exist until seventeen, seventeen eighty nine, but nonetheless describe historically what nations stop slavery and what nations continued it even through today.
Well, look, when you go back to say, let's say the fifteen hundred, the world in the in fifteen hundred was totally racist, totally tribalist, and everyone practiced slavery everywhere.
I mean.
People like to think of Native American tribes as you know, rather peaceful, and.
I've they really weren't.
They massacred each other all the time. In Africa, I mean, tribes massacred other tribes in the most horrific way. Shark of the Zulu wiped out in the tribe of forty thousand in about ninety minutes on the battle today, Men, women and children slaughtered the lot in just a few moments. So the whole world was a really tribal and rather
vicious place. And the beginning of a change in that came mainly in Britain in the eighteenth century, when some fonsophers like John Locke and David Hume started to say, look, everyone, all people's on earth are basically the same underneath, depending on how they're raised, what society of the is they they're all cable looked good if only the faith in the right way. That that attitude was so powerful that that within one hundred years the British had banned slavery.
Now they were the first to band slavery. Not only that they were the first country that had an extensive discussion of what was wrong with slavery, and there was a public it was public thing. They the Brits were because they were so prosperous because of the free market system. They had about half the population literate in the eighteenth century. No other country had that kind of widespread liberacy. So he had public opinion that developed because of the biggause,
people could read. Public opinion became a huge force and that powered the discussion of the rights of every human being to be free, and that that produced at the end of slavery in Britain and then in North America.
Factory and professor, there's no credit bay, there's no credit given. English or Americans banned the importation of slaves in like eighteen oh five.
We fought a civil war over it.
Six hundred thousand Americans were killed because the Democrats living in the South wanted to keep slaves the Confederacy. We went to war, and so two countries at the forefront of stopping slavery were England and America. And going back historically, eighty five percent of the slaves did not come to America.
We stopped it.
Abraham Lincoln fifty years before the Emancipation Proclamation. We prohibited the importation of slaves into the country. We're the only ones that did it. We get no credit, zero credit reparations. Everyone pays because who's got the deepest pocket. But I'm proud to be an American that we stopped slavery while in Africa it continued.
Correct, absolutely correct.
Look, I mean it is about eighteen hundred as the British, which had the most powerful navy of the world. You know what they set their navy onto. They set their navy to roam the seas and stop the transit lane
slave trade. They were the only group that was actually actively and you know what happened as a result that the slave trade, which had been moving slaves from the western edge of Africa to America, the African slave traders instead, because they were stopped by the British on the west of Africa, they moved their slave trade to the eastern end of Africa and they continued. So all they did was simply avoid the British navy by going to the other side of Africa to mount their operations from. But
I mean, there's just no question about it. Africa continued slave trading after the Europeans were stopping it. And you know, it had thrived over As you say, the one thing that's unique about the I mean Britain and America, the one thing is unique about them as far as slaver is concerned.
They stopped it. Nobody else stopped it.
In fact, in fact, today there's more slaves alive than ever before, and it's in Africa and Asia. In fact, the number one slave traders were Arabs and Muslims. They simply continued it. And we're guilt. We're guilty parties. I guess for several decades it was awful, it was terrible, but damn it, we stopped it. And it continued throughout the world, especially in Central and South America up until about forty or fifty years ago, and to continuing now
in Africa and Asia. So when you talk about reparations, the slave trade in the Atlantic, slave trade could not have existed without African tribes selling each other into slavery. Correct, The Africans originated the slave.
Trade, absolutely, and the Arabs was very important of the slife trade. They kept it going much longer than anybody else did. So, you know, but are ignorant radicals in this country? Are ignorant radicals, You don't know anything about it history. They blame us as if the invented slavery. We were the only person ever to have it. No, the one thing about us was unique. It was not that we pracised it, but we stopped it. And the same was true of empire. Look, I mean the last
empire was the British Empire. Now everybody blames the British for imperialism, but in fact that in hundreds of empires going back, you know, thousands of years, the last empire was the British. That was it the last one because the British said the empire is not a good idea and they dissolved their own empire. No empire ever dissolved itself before. The reason for the end of the Roman
Empire was they got defeated militarily. The end of the Ottoman Empire, Tooks, was because they lost, They lost a war. But the British lose militarily. They voluntarily decided that everybody preserved to have their own.
Free and that's England, that's America, England. One other thing.
In eighteen sixty two, during the Civil War, a ship carrying slaves from Africa to Cuba and violation of the ban on international slave trade put in by Britain and by America was captured in the High Seas by the US Navy. The crew who was importing these slaves into Cuba were imprisoned and the captain was hanged in the US. So America and Britain were the only two countries they said, wait a minute, these black folks from Africa have value. In fact, the word slaves come from Slavs, which is
an Eastern European term. The Muslims, the Arabs, the Africans, the Asians participated fully in the slave trade, and damn in America stopped it along with England. But we get no credit because there's no money in it. There's money in CRT, there's money in DEEI, an eight billion dollar industry per year, but there's no money in complementing America.
Correct.
Well, also those political advantage radicals what the radicals America? Because America has a highly successful free market society. In fact, America has proved the free market capitalism will expend out the system, that's all it is to it.
We've totally proved it.
And that's why the radicals who are Marxists hate us, because we proved that Marxism was stupid. But so they'll seize every opportunity they can to tear down this country and slavery and racism that's one of the ways in which they try to do it.
But as you.
Said, I mean they're completely mistaken. We were the heroes of that situation racism, anti racism, but we were the ones that began the idea of anti racism.
Well, we have to run, professor, but Al Sharpton makes a lot of money out of this deal. There's an eight billion dollar industry at stake. But glad to have you on critical race theories and inversion of history the book and also at the Wall Street Journal by Professor John Alis, author of a short history of relations between people's tribalism and racism were universal until Britain's an Americans
said this must be stopped. But thank you and the professor John Ellis, thanks for coming on setting the record straight. And you're a great Britain I'm a great American and God bless you.
Thank you so much for having me.
God bless you.
Let's continue with more when there's a lot of money out there, twist and turn the reality of history to fit a diet tribe that puts money in your pocket. Talk to Al Sharpton about that Bill cunning into the Grand American Live with You every Sunday night. When I watch all the Sunday morning talk shows, I look at the leftists explaining what's happening to our country. Most Americans, most Americans think the Republican Party looks after their concerns
more than the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party has never been as unpopular as it is today. And secondly, Trump has a forty five percent approval rating and the Republicans in the Congress are above fifty percent. And so you get that message from the mainstream media how unpopular the Democrats are. It's good to watch them kind of blow up. It's good to kind of watch them kind of follow themselves. And what Schumer did, I guess the answer is, tell
me the out queue. If Schumer would have stuck with the other Democrats and voted against the cr well, what's the outque How do you resolve this thing? The answer is it isn't resolved. More chaos and confusion. But don't pay attention to the mainstream media thinking you're going to get objectivity. He simply doesn't happen if I stay tuned,
we have Leland Bitterer coming up of News Nation. He had some shows this week about why not they have Canada becoming part of the Union and would guarantee democratic electoral votes in additional fifty six or fifty seven for the rest of the century. And that's not necessarily a good thing. Bill Cunningham with you every single.
That Willie the rough You by Choice Hotels, Econo Lodge and Roadway Hotels are serving up double points for every qualifying stay book at Choice Hotels dot com.
Now here's the man who's been recognized as radio's best, the recipient of not one, but two prestigious Marconi Awards for his broadcast episodence, the one and only Bill Cunningham.
Bullie Cunningham the Grand America and joining you and I now is Leyland, veteran News Nation every Monday through Friday at Leland Villa. Welcome again to the Bill Cunningham Show and Leland. First of all, you did a segment the last couple of nights about war, about a wartime president, and I thought it was excellent because we may look back on the start of what's happening in the Ukraine
what's happening now. Putin appears to of course, he likes peace, of course, but he has his certain conditions which make peace impossible. We're dealing with a maniacal mass murderer in Vladimir Putin. So before we talk about tariffs and Canada becoming our fifty first state, talk to the American people about the wartime president and your warnoes dot com and why you think this could be a precursor to something much more dangerous in the world.
You know, Bill, American has been through some pretty difficult times, and we forget that, right the revolution, Civil War to world wars, the Great Depression nine to eleven, and every time our president has rallied us together and has told us that the times that we are in our difficult these are the sacrifices that are going to be required, oftentimes the ultimate sacrifice by brave Americans. But it's going to be worth it in the end.
And here's why.
And that I think is what's missing from Donald Trump's rhetoric right now, is that we are very much a wartime country. He is a wartime president economically.
Trade warwise.
Certainly when it comes to Ukraine, there is a real war that America is involved in the Middle East, and we haven't yet heard that kind of rhetoric from Donald Trump. American people are remarkably resilient and also remarkably accepting of sacrifice. Think about how Roosevelt is getting reelected during World War Two when tens of thousands of Americans were dying, so America is will think about Nixon getting reelected.
Americans are willing.
To sacrifice and to stick by their leader when their leader is telling them why they're sacrificing. I think, especially when it comes to the economy in tariffs, that is something really lacking right now from President Trump.
And including George Bush and twenty oh four. Bush forty three was not much of an order. He was, I think a failed president for all kinds of reasons. But he was able to rally the nation in twenty oh four with the Trilateral the three Demons of deceit all over the Middle East and also in North Korea and China and Rondo. You know, he was able to do it, and I think Trump has it in him. When I watched about half of the speech of the Joint Session about ten days ago, he had soaring rheteric at the
end of a speech. But the character of Donald Trump is to punch and CounterPunch and keep punching and counterpunching until your opponent is gone.
And I'm not sure he can be I suppose.
But if you would ask the average person in New York, Atlanta, Cincinnati, or Las Vegas, hey, are we on a wartime footing? I think ninety nine percent would say no. The American people don't feel like we're on the beginning of World War three, which the Trumpster has talked about. But the American people don't appreciate the trade wars in the southern border Ukraine and Israel.
We got North Korea.
How about this that China has these large barges they've put off their coast to have like a jan to have like a D Day invasion of Taiwan. I saw the photographs on a satellite last night. I'm thinking, you got to be kidding me. These large barges are ready to launch against Taiwan with tens of thousands of Chinese soldiers and also tanks. And why would they do that if they weren't planning soon on invading Taiwan. And if that happens, then all hell breaks loose. Why don't the
American people recognize what we're going to war? Somewhere in a big way.
I think the American people recognize that they're hurting. You at the average American in any of the cities that you talked about, Hey, does your paycheck last to the end of the month.
Hey, are you.
Better off now than you were before COVID? Do you feel do you feel economically more secure?
Hey?
How do you feel about the war?
World right now?
Feels kind of crazy, doesn't it. They may not articulate the wartime, they know, they may not like the connection, but that's how they feel. And that to me is that the president needs to respond to how the American people feel, and he's not not.
At this point. Not at this point.
And I pray to God China does not invade Taiwan. I like to think Vladimir Putin will say, you know what, a million Russian soldiers have been killed and maimed.
It's time to stop that.
I would like to think Hamas would say, okay, unconditional surrender. We lost the war Israel, yu one come in, we will surrender our hostages and give up.
I don't see that happening. And on the southern border.
We're about to deputize I think large numbers of private contractors to exact from this country illegal aliens, which is going to cause more of a FRAMEWI.
Are you talking about the Eric Prince play.
Yeah, yeah, Eric Prince.
Yeah, it's not gonna happen.
I don't think so, but I know it's being discussed. But well, it's up to the leadership.
Eric on this. I had Eric on the show.
It's not gonna happen, and I think that would cause turmoil.
But at this point, we'll see. All I can say is we'll see what happens.
Secondly, about Canada, you did a great segment on this, and I mentioned it about a week ago that why in the world what a Republican president ever went Canada to become the fifty first state when they're a little bit bigger than California. Give us the numbers if this happens, which I think would be fanciful, that what would happen if Canada became the fifty first state.
So Canada gets fifty seven Electoral College votes, fifty five members of the House, which ensures unquestionably no Republican ever wins the presidency and Republicans never control the House Representatives again period, unlikely to control.
The Senate full stop right there, full stop.
Look, math does not lie. So you could use your own You can jus your own opinions. You can't choose your own facts. Those are the facts. It is perplexing to me. I guess the best argument Donald Trump could have if he wants to turn it into like a Puerto Rican, go like a territory or a protectorate, which again,
why would you want to protect it? The fact that they have universal healthcare up there, which is our guest point out last night, is not universal lecess to healthcare, is universal access to a waiting room and to high taxes. But I think the bigger point here is the Donald Trump trolling to Canada. It's kind of funny, but it might be missing the larger issue, which is that it is doing the opposite of what Trump wants to have
happened in Canada. Because what Trump wants to have happened in Canada, and it's a worthy goal, is to get rid of the liberal, lunatic policies and government of Canada and replace it with a government that is more sane, both on climate and therefore energy production, more willing to be an honest trading partner of the United States, more willing to commit to NATO, and more willing to have reasonable and tough immigration laws to stop the Chinese from
exploiting Canada and from mass Muslim migration. Five very valid points. The problem is by continuing to call Canada the fifty first state, he is emboldening the liberal leadership in Canada. Canada were about ready to elect a conservative prime minister. Now they're back on the liberal train. So this we may have to figure out how the art of the deal, the weed is going to come back here.
In fact, months ago it was an article of faith that liberalism had failed in Canada and that their ex prime minister was to the left of Gavin Newsom, and that Canada was ready to try like constitutional conservatism, republicanism. That's out, that's out completely. And now the Canadians have
united against America. And I would also point out, relative to the tariffs of this place into Canada that I looked it up that Canada produces every year about two million automobile two million, light vans, trucks and cars two million, the great majority come to America, and so a US senator friend of mine. I talked to him a couple of nights ago about this. I said, is Donald Trump
this smart? He said, what do you mean? I said, well, Canada produces two million vehicles, the great majority of which come to America, and the two major imports into America from Canada are cars from four GM, Stillanus and others. And the other thing is energy. And honestly, he wants those cars. There's two million vehicles to be made here. And he also we have all the energy that we need. However, it's much cheaper to have it from Alberta than to
have these new plants and pipelines, et cetera. I said, but long term, does he hold Canada's economic future in the palm of his hand? Referring to Donald Trump? And if you eliminate automobile production in Canada, which is a huge business two million cars every year, and on top of it, energy production, Canada almost collapses. And that's not good either, to have a collapse failed state on our northern border. That's angry at US. So I would ask
you Leland Vendertive News nation. Is Trump that smart? Or is he blundered into this blindly to something that's going to hurt us in the long run because we need a stable trading partner.
But they've been taking advantage of us.
But can you imagine the Canadian economy with two million less vehicles and all that entails plus no energy coming from Canada. What does Canada look like?
What does Canada look like? It looks like a country that then looks to China.
Well, they're begun that turn now that they're talking about having closer relations to China and maybe in BeO right And I'm thinking.
Well, right, And they did all this.
They did all this after Donald Trump started talking about winning the fifty winning him to be the fifty first state. Well, the problem with treating the presidency like a reality TV show. And we've done a lot of stories that the chaos theory in Donald Trump's way of doing business works a lot of times. It yields results and it does, but it comes at a cost, which is you turn something into a reality show and sometimes you get these unintended consequences.
You start talking about Canada's the fifty first state, it sounds funny, It sort of galvanizes public opinion, It gets everybody a flutter, and it owns the Libs in the United States and gets CNN, MSNBC all a gas, which is what Donald Trump likes to do. That's all fine. Sometimes it works, sometimes it yields big results. But in this case, what it's done I think is it's had an unattended consequence. And clearly when you do the ready
fire aim routine, you miss. Sometimes this appears to be a miss.
And I would say that Trudeau is more popular now and Canada has ever been. That the new premiere is one hundred percent organizing Canada against US, and maybe in the long run some deal will be struck where they're going to lo their barriers a lot more of our products into Canada and vice versa. He also picked a huge fight with the fight with the EU. You can't find a Chevrolet or a Ford anywhere in Europe, but BMW's and Mercedes are all over the all over the world.
Here Ferraris, they're here. And doesn't Trumpster have a point that reciprocal tariffs make sense and that we don't have reciprocity now and that Europeans are now getting mad at them for all kinds of reasons. I don't care much about Europeans. It's basically Europe right now as a museum. It's not a compilation of countries that are functioning. Europe is largely a museum for tourists to go and look at the glories of the past. But he's picking fights
with everybody all over the world. And I go back to my conversation with his US senator. Is he that smart? Can he look ahead four or five moves and say, all of a sudden, the EU is going to lower their tariffs and our Fords and Chevy's going to be there with Canada, He's.
Got them all riled up.
At some point in next year or two, there's going to be a deal struck, and that we're going to have more farming products going there, more lumber going there, and that maybe a million cars we made in Canada instead of two million, And then on the southern border we're going to have no illegal immigration whatsoever. And I hope Donald Trump is that smart, and I think maybe he is. If I had to vote today for him, I'd vote for him again ten times rather than the alternative,
which was a disaster on the southern border. And whenever I argue with somebody who said, man, it looks like a lot of chaos. I said, imagine the other side, what would America look like?
Bill?
What's it?
Yeah, Joe Biden, do you always say don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternatives and everyone that's really great? And people say that it did work for a while, and that was how he talked about don't compare me to Donald Trump and the chaos. It doesn't work because the American people don't think about the alternative. They think about their lives right now and the blaming Joe Biden and the oh it could be worst line.
It works on cable TV, and it is something that you know, kind of right now because people still remember Joe Biden will have will be effective. It's not going to be effective in six months. It's just not not how the American people think. And Trump supporters can say it over and over and over again, but history tells us that that type of rhetoric just doesn't work.
Yeah, because Joe Biden didn't have the linguistic skills to overcome the arguments. And when Kamala Harris was talking about I promise to continue the policies of Joe Biden, that was the death knell of her campaign. If we can look at it in six months, and let's say it's the middle of September and we have a the tax
cuts are in effect. He's worked out trade deals all over the world, that Vladimir Putin has stopped his advances on the Ukraine, that Hamas largely has surrender, had been obliterated by the Israeli military, and the Chinese for those large barges off the east coast of their country ready to invade Taiwan doesn't happen. And there's flourish and there's great economy. The market's backup.
Uh.
Would you be surprised?
I think that is a awfully lot of bounces on the pool shot on the pool table, boom.
Right, Look, is it? Is it possible that?
And I would think, really we need to look to for a year, okay, and and that that Trump has brought about significant good change. Into your point, trade deals have have changed, that there's something different in Ukraine, that the continuing meat grinder has stopped. I wouldn't. I would be surprised. I Vladimir Putin had been put in his place. Really, that the Chinese, in one way or another, back down, and that Israel has wiped out her mind.
Oh well, and and and no illegal migration, that's all stopped.
There's balanced.
But he's on the border.
He's won the board.
And why they're not talking about that more, I don't understand. It's perplexing to me. Take your wins and celebrate your wins, which is rule number one in politics. He did with Joe Biden, he did in one month with Joe Biden said couldn't be done in four years.
So that's an important point.
But I think that the Donald Trump sort of legacy right is going to be written after four years, and certainly after a year this all these like all the and I asked the Republicans yesterday, you know, the freak out and bed wedding for lack of a better term, over pariffs, and that, you know, the ten percent dip in the stock market and everything else, get a grip really, like you may be right that this is going to be bad for the economy. You may be wrong, but
we don't know right now. And the procrastinations are a lot. But the one thing that I think is clear about Trump, if he hasn't he has a game plan. He's following to one. You got to see where this ends. And what is remarkable to me, and I think it's an undercovered story, is how Donald Trump has destroyed the Democrats. Democrats said Trump was going to destroy America. Trump has
destroyed Democrats. They are right now. You've got Democrats rallying around a Prohama Syrian and saying he can't be deported and refusing to vote for a bill that bans.
Boys and girl sports.
That's pretty impressive.
That's real impressive because when you rally around that Khalil character and say that boy, we're going to take our future on Khalil and boys playing girl sports and men playing in Wimbledon against women, and you stake your political life on that hill, You're going to die on that hill.
But all right, we got to run.
But Leland vedder to warnoes dot Com Monday through Friday every night on News Nation, and to begin you believe the president is a war time president, and we pray that he wins these wars, as America generally does not accept World War two. But Leland Villa, once again, thank you for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show, and Leland you're.
A great American. Thank you very much.
Always, God bless you.
Let's continue with more.
If you would tap on the shoulder of the average American and say, you know what, are we in a wartime footing?
No, we're not a wartime footing.
It's worried about prices, worried about the stock market, that kind of stuff.
We'll see what happens.
Bill Cunningham, the Great American, live with you every Sunday night.
You know, Leland Vetter, News Nation on every night at nine o'clock on News Nation with Sean Compton makes more sense than many, especially I don't understand why the President would want to joke about having Canada become the fifty first state because in electorally, Republicans would be done hopefullyngue in cheek. Coming up next to Steve molloy of Junk
science dot Com. He's followed the money as to why how Stacy Abrams and others received two billion dollars to enhance democratic turnout and elections using your money for those purposes? And where's the money? The director of the EPA said at one point, I have one hundred billion dollars in walking around money.
Who wants it handed out?
The liberals and others to buy things like refrigerators and insulation for homes.
The whole thing makes no sense, but it's the way that Democratic Party operates.
Stay tuned for more Steve Malloy's next Bill Cunningham with you every single Bill Cunningham, the Great American. Of course, Steve malloy is an expert when it comes to government spending. He's an Institute fellow and former Trump EPA Transition member, and he's also the headquarters of Junk's dot com. Has a great story up about one of the reasons I voted for Donald Trump, about five or six of them, was maybe to break down the government spending, which is
a complete waste. So now we've learned the Department of Justices just launched an investigation into the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which received twenty seven billion dollar payout from Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. And the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund was distributed between eight groups, and guess what, all are headed by former members of the Obama and Biden administrations, including Stacy Abrams, several of which were suspecially found. They were
founded just after the opening of the Grand Application. It's like me and Tony Benner getting together and say, we'll put in a grant, let's get a five O C five o'h one C three together, call it a cleaner environment in Ohio. And all of a sudden, literally hundreds of millions of dollars flow in our account. And then we get to work that same uh, that same Malloy's with us now, and once again it's unbelievable. I'd love
this kind of story, this kind of reporting. Steve malloy, tell the American people about what the Department of Justice is now investigating about this twenty seven billion dollar EPA green scheme.
Yeah, well, if you're only getting hundreds of millions of dollars, you're.
Not very good at this bill.
So since Trump's been in office, an EPA A, you know, finally uncovered all these billions and twenty seven billion that went the EPA to establish this thing called a green bank, and you know, it's part of the Inflation Reduction Act, spending a trillion dollars. And so EPA got twenty seven billion dollars to hand out to its friends in the environmental movement. And some of these groups got as much as like eight billion dollars. A group formed by Stacy
Abrams got two billion dollars. And before she got the two billion dollars had they had one hundred dollars in that bank account. Because as you said, these are all pop up groups. As soon as they announced the availability of the money, all these groups were set up and the process was wired and they just got billions of dollars. So EPA and the Department of Justice are now in
the process of trying to claw this money back. You know, it was parked at City Bank, which was literally thrown out, as Lee's Elvin's video showed, was like gold bars thrown off Titanic, and they went to City Bank for as a staging area or a parking place for all this money to go to these green groups. So the Department of Justice is now looking into the criminality. ETA is
trying to claw this money back. Last week, I was watching MSNBC because I like to see what they're saying, and Stacy Abram showed up to defend what she had done. And she told Chris Hayes, the MSNBC person, that what they were doing was they were buying appliances for poor people. They had planned to buy appliances for Porto. So if you liked Obama phones. You remember the Obama phones from
like twenty twelve. You know they used to buy votes in Detroit or wherever you're gonna love Biden refrigerators and Biden air conditioners. Right, of course, none of this worked out for Kamala Harris. But you know, the Greens still have the money, and we still have to and now they actually they actually have the the hutzpot to sue the Trump administration to get the money right in some.
Federal judges, some of them might order it to be paid.
Because we have eight hundred federal judges six hundred district courts. I guess they have their own public policy arms in the federal judiciary, and they're gonna require Trump, like in USA, to give the money out even if they shouldn't. So going back to Stacy Abrams, this is the woman out of Georgia that trice twice ran against Brian Camp lost
each time, and so she was looking for money. And so I would think someone in the Biden administration and the so called energy area got a hold of these eight or nine persons who worked for the Biden obamadministrations and said, we have some serious money to hand out, but you have to have a group to do it. And she also said she also did some insulation of homes in Georgia. She did insulation and bought them dishwashers and refrigerators with US two billion dollars.
Is this criminal? I mean, you're not a criminal lawyer? Well did that? It sounds to me like a.
Criminal criminal law law school. So I have some idea. Well, the whole thing was a crime. I mean, you know this you got to keep in mind. And Placy Reduction Act was rammed through Congress, only passed because Kamala Harris
cast a tie breaking vote. You know, as soon as the law was passed, the EPA administrator I have them on tape bragging about getting one hundred billion dollars, you know, be a billion with a bee, one hundred billion dollars in walking around money, which of course is you know, of buying money, because that's the phrase you use, walking
around money. And you know, during twenty twenty four I head the election, sixty four billion million dollars of that money was dumped into battleground states obviously to help Kamala Harris win. Now it failed, I mean, so you know she didn't just waste a billion dollars of private donors money. She wasted sixty five billion dollars and still lost.
It's I look at this and I'm thinking you it comes to mind, You've got to be kidding me that this is not criminal. And I'd like to track the refrigerators, track the dishwashers, see about the washers and dryers. Where's the insulation? Is a foam insulation? How did this happen? And this all happened in the past, uh what year? Sixteen months before took I know that.
She's I don't know that she's actually gotten any of the money to actually buy anything, but she was scheduled to get it. And look, I've been a federal contractor. I've gotten grants. You know, they crawl up your rear end. You need to have lawyers and accountants and they check your bona fides. You can't just have some bogus bank account with one hundred dollars in it like Stacey Abrams. And also Stacy Abrams has just no experience in installation
or appliances or EPA or the environment or anything. You know, this was clearly just giving her money for whatever reason she wanted to spend it on and this thing.
Are you saying that you have hope that the Trump Start can recapture some of this money that went to these eight to nine groups, this twenty seven billion dollars shoveling money out the door before the election. Is there a chance the taxpayer can be repaid?
Well, yeah, but it's gonna be hard, right because the left, I mean, they don't just you know, follow these lawsuits in any court. They follow the lawsuits in the court that they're going to win, you know, at the trial court, they're going to win at the appeals court, and stuff has to go to the Supreme Court, and then you have to hope that the conservative justices like are interested in taking the case. So yeah, I think Trump is
going to try. Trump is gonna you know, I think he's got he sort of has bank by the short hairs because unless they want to be regulated to death, they better cough up that money. So you know, we'll see. But I mean, this just goes to show how out of control our government is. And you know, I understand people are concerned about what's going on and you know, tariffs and stuff like that, but our government is out
of control. We cannot afford it. You know there may be some short term pain in fixing the situation, but the situation has to be fixed. We cannot have a government where no count people like Stacy Abrams just get two billion dollars to do whatever she wants with.
We're sixty minutes, we'res CBS News, Where's NBC, ABC, Where's PBS?
Where are they saying? Now, wait a minute, where are you? Why aren't they investigating this?
Because they're on her side, They're in on it. Yeah. When I was watching MSNBC with her on, Chris Hanes just like nodding, like, yeah, she's got a legita in legit complaint, she got a legit project. And it's crazy. I mean, people don't understand, especially conservatives, don't really understand the dire shape we're in and how evil the other side is.
Let's talk about EV's and Tesla for many years. Of course, I'm not going to buy an EV. I have a hybrid, which I love, and I get like forty miles to the gallon. It's wonderful, and the electricity is produced by the tires, etc. It's wonderful. But the liberals loved Evs. They loved him so much that Tesla and Elon Musk was the patron saint of liberalism because he was bringing
EV's to the roadways. The government shoveled out billions of dollars, I said, billions and billions of dollars to the EV industry, and large, large amounts of money. And they did that in order to keep it going. So they gave the Afford and all the others these billions of dollars. Then they gave individuals seven thousand dollars each to buy an EV. But all of a sudden, EV's are now in the crossairs.
The other day when Donald Trump had Elon Musk on the driveway of the White House showing all these great evs, the coverage by MSNBC was disgusting. How come the liberals which loved evs, loved Tesla, and loved Elon Musk, have done at Texas al Paso and now attacking him and trying to burn down Tesla dealerships, burning up these so called power stations for evs that costs US something like eight billion dollars.
Explain that to me, Well, let's just don't care about EV's. They don't care about the environment, they don't care about the climate, none of this is about that.
This is all about political power.
They're going after trying to intimidate Musk. You know, they want to threaten Musk's business, which you know, his ev business, Tesla, is the bulk of his fortune. So that's what they're going after. You know, I just find it interesting. I worked in for an Ohio coal company during the Obama years, and Obama killed fifty thousand hot paying coal jobs and they were in Ohio and hundreds of thousands of other support industry, local jobs. And you know, none of those
people burned down anything. I mean, they just you know, they just went quietly to the good night. Now here you have these leftists, you know, Elon Musk and President Trump are trying to fix the federal government, you know, get the spending under control. They don't like it, so they're going to burn down tessel dealerships.
Bringing about what they seek to avoid. And so at one point, well when Biden and Obama destroyed millions and millions of small manufacturing jobs and energy jobs, how about the pipeline. The first thing Biden did is canceled the pipeline. Did sixty minutes saddle up next to pipeline workers in South Dakota and talk about how terrible it is the decision of Joe Biden to cancel the Excel pipeline and the impact that has. But if a federal worker loses his or her job, it's a national story.
Yeah, nobody cared about all these coal miners. People were just glad to see you go, you know, glad to see it go away. These leftists are crazy. People don't understand the mindset of the leftists, and they're just they're crazy. They are going to destroy our country they already. I mean, look,
look how hard it is. Look at situation we're in where Stacy Abrams is getting two billion dollars and tens of billions of over dollars are going out, and they tried to buy the election with Inflation Reduction Act money, and you know, where's the ollary. I've been talking about this since it happened. You know, the equip of the EPA administrator saying that he got one hundred million dollars in walking around money. I posted that after the Inflation
Reduction Act was passed in August twenty twenty two. I talked about the dumping of the money, tens of billions into the battleground state's last fall. But you know, I mean, finally people have dived into this. It's just outrageous.
So the EPAID director under Biden said, and this was in the media, I have one hundred billion dollars in walking around money. And the messages, calls were made, text were sent out. You got to put together a five and one C three call it Insulation and Georgia or MC dishwasher in South Carolina, and we're going to give you two billion dollars. So the city Bank got the money from the federal government and then it's sitting there getting great interest. And then when the bureaucrats say it's
good to release the money now to this group. Do you know the name is Stacy Abrams group, but that you put together some fictitious name to get the money.
Yeah, well, all the groups are new. They just made up stuff. I think only one of the groups had like more than a year's of you know, existence before and the ability. The really awful part about all of this is that, you know, Republicans Donald Trump wants to repeal all this spending, the whole Green New scam. He wants to repeal it, but he can't because Republicans in Congress are blocking him. They sent him a letter last week saying that we'd like the green new scam spending.
In fact, explain this to the American people that you would think this is liberal and Democrats, this is Elizabeth Warren. But there are many Republicans telling the Trumps to, hey, let's get into the action. Are sets we put together our own five one c threes. We can do something on the other side and get the money. Unbelievable, Yeah no, but we can't afford it.
The government is broke. We can't afford anything. We've got to stop this. We got to stop this now. We spent a trillion dollars in interesting this last year. We're thirty six trillion in debt. Who's got money for this? None?
And the big money's in the Defense Department. I can imagine there's one hundred billion dollars a year in the Defense Department.
How about this?
The GAO under Biden said that every budget cycle between two hundred and fifty the five hundred and fifty billion dollars is misspent, waste, fraud and abuse, and or can't be tracked. And the Defense Department's not passing audits since seventeen eighty seven. They have no idea where the money is. Tony Bender's great grandparents are one hundred and fourteen years old. Each of them are getting fact checks in the mail from Social Security.
And God help you if you want to look into this. Something's wrong.
Republicans don't want you to look into this. This, This is truly a scam. This is out of a Stein deck.
In five years from now. This is another thing I said a lot of conservatives. If jd.
Vance or some other conservative doesn't win the presidency in twenty twenty eight, we go back to the policies of Obama and Biden. The EO is issued by Trump will be put to the side unless it's law, and we're back to where were before.
Is that fair to say that this has got.
To be institentially, But I mean, you know, we've got to get past twenty twenty six. I mean, the Democrats were to take over Congress or even one House of Congress again, you can only imagine what they would try to do. But certainly twenty twenty eight, boy, if we lose the White House, oh my god, you know, my country, we are in deep, deep trouble. I mean, the government is twenty five percent of our economy. That is outrageous.
We cannot have that. That's why you know there's so many people upset about not getting their checks because the government just gives everybody checks except for the hard working people.
It used to be seventeen eighteen percent of the econom me was federal government spending. Now it's twenty five percent. Schedule to go up. And the other thing even though the cr is I guess's going to happen. Nonetheless, we're in the middle right now of the Biden budget, which started October first of twenty twenty four. It goes to October first of twenty twenty five, and unless there's changes in the law, this will all be temporary. In America
will rush again toward bankruptcy. With Steve molloy, I tell you a great website, he's Junkscigens dot com. But to give Stacy Abrams two billion dollars, they have the federal government seek out administrators from the Obama era in order to give them hundreds of billions. Did the EPA directors say I got one hundred billion dollars in walking around money?
Who wants it?
That's the level of thing crazy I don't know what to say, but the investigation, Where's CBS, Where's PBS, where's NPR?
Why aren't they investigating this?
Well, they're defending them, right, That's how That's how I came across the Stacey Abrams clip. I'm speechless, and.
That's hard for you and I to say.
But Steve molloy Junk Science dot Com, thanks for putting a light on these cockroaches.
Maybe they'll go into the boards. We'll see Steve malloy, thank you all.
Let's continue with more one hundred billion dollars walking around money?
Who wants it? Bill cunning him The Grand American Live with You every Sunday Night by Billy Cunningham. Mus continue to imagine spending about four trillion dollars, A good chunk of that went out to interest groups only of the Democratic Party. They do all kinds of things.
And I am certain that Pam Bondi and others Cash Betel are going to follow the money to see how was it possible that the director of the EPA could tell Americans, you know what, I have one hundred billion dollars in walking around money?
Who wants it?
And the way the game was played is you then set up five one C threes and fours and to come up with a plan. And then the money was deposited in a checking account at City Bank in New York, and then they had Warren's issued against the bank to pay people like Stacy Abrams two billion dollars. And there was huge management fees involved. Also, the Clinton Foundation received in one trunch about two hundred and eighty five million of your money, with twenty eight million, ten percent being
a management fee. Hillary Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, Who's managing all that money? And then during the campaign, these five O one C threes and C fours would donate back to the Democratic Party the money the taxpayer gave them to do nothing. And Trump is stopping all that. That's why Doze is very popular. And I'm a Chevrolet kind of a guy. But if I was inclined to buy at an ev, which I'm not, I'd buy a Tesla as a protest, i'letus continue with more coming up nex as
a man who's going to bring the receipts? And those were the very Congressman Warren Davidson. I watched him two or three days ago on the set of CNN getting beat up by one of the one of the hosts. We sure to set the records, trade and more. Cunningham the Grand American with you every Sunday.
Night, Willie.
Brocking you by Choice Hotels, Econo Lodge and Roadway In Hotels are serving up double points for every qualifying stay book at choice hotels dot com. Now here's the man who's been recognized as radio's best, the recipient of not one, but two prestigious Marconi Awards for his his broadcast excellence, the one and only Bill Cunningham, Notcolly.
Cunningham, the Great American.
Of course, all hell's breaking loose, and the Congress, of course passed on Friday, the cr We have tariff difficulties. I watch some of the morning talk shows, all breaking loose there. It's seemingly there are about eight hundred federal judges and each one of them has a different foreign policy. So on Saturday, there was an effort by a judge in Washington, DC to stop the arrest and conveyance of these vicious Venezuelan gangs to a third party that would
have been El Salvador. We'll see how that's taking place. In more plus, we have DOSEE protests all over the country and they're targeting Tesla Tesla dealerships. And I'm told by Bloomberg, etc. The number one American made vehicle is a Tesla. Most American hands make it and the products come from America and it's an ev But liberals don't like that either. But Jonan, you and I now as Congressman more and Davidson, one of the leaders in the House, is a graduate of Notre Dame. He's also a veteran.
He watched the Berlin wall fall. He's also a went through West Point and served many years in the military. Now he's been in office about ten years. And once again the Congressman Warren Davidson, Welcome to the Bill Cunningham Show. And Congressmen, I'm being told by some of my liberal
friends that they're in a turmoil. And you can only imagine what they're feeling like now that Chuck Schumer stabbed them in the back from their perspective, But does it make it easier to pass the Omnibus spending bill in a few months with the tax cuts having already approved, shall we say cr into September thirtieth of this year.
Look, all my left wing friends are in turmoil too. They're distraught, and you know, I want to feel bad for them, but you know, this is what I voted for. I mean my enthusiasm and most of most of the constituencies of Ohio's eighth district, Southwest Ohio, they're through the moon. They're excited about what's going on, and you know, some of them have some questions. A you know, what's going on with the tariffs. President Trump piloted that, say hey, we're going to take care of our farmers.
There'll be some impact.
And the reality is we were suffering from a fatal overdose of government on almost every front. So everything's distorted from the economy. It's it's juiced up about like Joe Biden at a press conference, and we got to get the excess government out and get it back on to free market economy. So there'll be some disruption, a little turbulence, but I think, you know, we're poised to come in for a good safe landing.
But yeah, I mean on the economy, that's what's going on in there.
But you look at they didn't accidentally facilitate an invasion of our county, of our country, and so they're not gonna sit by idly as we try to reverse the invasion. And so you literally have them defending Venezuelan gangs. Who are you know, flooding the country with people that are killing Americans.
That's crazy.
Well, the other I watched you a few days ago in CNN being badgered by one of their reporters, and some of the morning talk shows had the fact that right now President Trump and the Republicans are extremely more popular than the Democrats. In fact, some polling has the Democrats whether twenty one percent approval rating, CNN's at twenty nine percent, the President's like forty five percent, but among
Republicans he's about seventy percent. And really, you Republicans in Congress are much more popular with the American people than the Democrats in the Congress.
And tariffs play a part in that.
And can you.
Explain as you own small businesses and long term is that we don't live, of course, we live each day at days roll by quickly, the years, the years even more quick Can you explain the benefits of tariffs? Here we are in the middle of March, but what are the benefits of tariffs that maybe the Democrats and CNN that you're badgered by doesn't see, well, look.
In an ideal world, we would have very low to know tariffs at our border, but so would everybody else. I mean, I was in manufacturing and you talk about Look, it worked great for our armers. We were exporting food all over the world and we still are. But American manufacturer has been decimated and that's where more people work. And so you look at our towns hollowed out or
economy hollowed out. The whole phrase russ belt was coined frankly because with the benefit of hindsight, Ross Parrot was right, if you do all this stuff, you're going to hear a giant sucking sound of the jobs leaving our country. And with the benefit of hindsight, some people wouldn't change course. But President Trumps has said, well, he's probably right in the beginning, but he's also said, hey, we do need to change course.
And tell me how.
If you're one of our friends and allies that are all distraught, tell me how a reciprocal tariff that.
Just puts the same tariff you got on us on you. How's that unfair?
Reciprocity is the key, isn't it? Because I'm told by my friends and auto manufacturing. It's damn near impossible to get a Chevrolet or get a Ford in Europe, but it's very easy to get a Mercedes, or to get a Volkswagen, or get a BMW, or to get a French car. They make allows of cars, but the Italians make pretty damn good cars like Ferrari. I can't afford one. Friends of mine have them. Nonetheless, they sell their products here, but we can't sell our products there. So that's reciprocity.
With Canada, the same thing. There's two million American cars made in Canada every year that shipped into the United States, and the farmers and those who make lumber have a hell of a time getting their products in Canada. But because of NAFTA, the walls came tumbling down, the manufacturing jobs. There were millions left from Mexico and or Canada. And
all the President is saying, what's wrong with reciprocity? And I think the American people generally get it, But nonetheless it's having a negative effect on.
The stock market.
And so if you and I have this conversation, Congressman in about a year from now, it's going to take some time. What will America look like in the year from a job perspective, if the tariffs work and the Trump policies work, what does America look like in March of twenty twenty six.
Well, if we do this and we get the tax reform right, I mean one, if Congress doesn't take action this year, everybody's going to give a big tax increase, So that'll be really bad. So if we follow through and do what we're supposed to do, we hold taxes low for everybody, we get some other reforms back in place that kind of expired and went away, you'll see massive investment in the United States, and you'll see it simpler. I mean, there was investment announced under the Infrastructure Bill
under Joe Biden. About a third of it was actually going to infrastructure, but even that third had all these crazy strings attached. And I just got to say, talking to some of the guys in the skilled trades, there just aren't that many transgender concrete workers out there.
And to do some of these federal contracts at leased.
Under Joe Biden, you get all these DEI initiatives and everything else. Donald Trump is getting that not just the excess spending, but the excess government the regulation out of our economy, and as that frees up. I mean, I just talked to a small manufacturing guy friend of mine. He's got one point two million dollars worth of contracts in the past month that he wasn't getting. He got him out of China and got them out of Canada because the tariffs are in place. So those are the
stories that the media isn't going to highlight. And when that happens, you're getting instead of having warehouses, and look, I'm glad we have them.
Well while I was.
Close to everybody, so it's a good place to ship from. But warehouse jobs only pay so much. The big giant warehouses with a handful of people working through there to pull all the goods out of them, the factory jobs, the engineering and the investment like GE's headquarters in Cincinnati, that's where you really get the motibles and the big high wage jobs.
And so what this is after a year or two or three, is that that NAFTA, that giant sucking sound will be reversed. And these companies like Honda, it was announced a few weeks ago to Honda, which is making a hybrid civic, is going to make it now in
Indiana and not make it in Mexico. And all these companies are now saying, Okay, if Trump's going to be in office, and he's going to be there for the next four years, the only way we can institutionalize these market changes is to win the presidency again nineteen and twenty twenty eight and twenty thirty two. We can't go back to Gavin Newsom or Kamala Harris and have these changes take place, but that giant sucking sound will be out of Canada and Mexico and out of Europe and
not here. And a second issue, I want to get on with you about these federal judges. You know, I sleep with a judge. I've slept with her now for about fifties two years. I love sleeping with a judge. I worked for judges. I was a federal law clerk, and I was an attorney general. I love judges. However, we can't have eight hundred different federal judges making foreign
policy decisions. We had one on Saturday that supposedly was going to try to turn around a flight of Venezuelan gang members, the TDA Gang, and bring them back, but they were outside territorial waters. I anticipate that's going to continue to drive liberals nuts. But one of your colleagues wants to impeach some of these federal judges that want
to envelop their own, shall we say, foreign policy. I can't imagine the President, when he bombed the Hooties a day or two ago, to go to a federal judge who asked permission to launch that when you declare, when they declared, when the President declared that the TDA gangs out of Venezuela were domestic enemies in a sense terrorist, much like we don't get permission from a federal judge to bomb Hesbalajamas, Taliban, Boca Ram did Trump the other day when he killed one of the leaders of ISIS
have to go to a federal judge and get permission to conduct American foreign policy? Do you see as a congressman and a ranger and someone went to Notre Dame, and someone went to West Point, someone that's own businesses. It's a problem when we have eight hundred different federal judges enacting tros against the President when he's conducting foreign policy.
Look, this is not just a bad judge, he's a crooked judge. This guy's been at the center of a lot of anti Trump action. He's you know, maybe not patient zero for Trump arrangement syndrome, but he's got it bad.
And this has less to do with the facts.
And I will say, look, even if Donald Trump wasn't there, if you had somebody else, it's an ideology. Like I say, they didn't just accidentally flood the country with the illegals. They did it on purpose. And they didn't do it in spite of the implications they did it because of them.
They It's crazy.
And that's why on issue after issue, Republicans are doing better than Democrats, because I mean, who defends the cartels. I get a bill called the Stop that Cartels Act, who's on to defend the cartel side? Well, now we know the Democrats are, this judge is they're defending the cartels. And you know, thank goodness for good allies like El Salvador and Naebukele putting these into a high security prison. It's not like as you guys are going to be turned loose. They're going to be put into one of
the highest security prisons in the world. And and then you can trust that they're going.
To get a they'll do it cheaper than we they would we would do.
It so uh, proven results in El Salvador. And look, these aren't just like your your neighborhood people that moved in and you know they had a kid and so now the baby's American, and you know they want to make all these happy syrapy songs. These are part of
criminal cartels. People that the President has declared rightly enemies of our country, people that run the black markets in our country, flooding our cities with sentinel killing tens of thousands of Americans every year, and they're rightly being treated as enemies of our country. Just like you can't have eight hundred judges deciding the foreign policy of our country. Frankly, you can't have five hundred and thirty five members of
Congress negotiating your tariff for having foreign policies either. Eventually, this stuff needs to be locked into law, because just like Donald Trump said when they were when Joe Biden wanted to lock a law in last Congress, he wanted to set a floor so that like one point eight million people got in no matter what. And we see now almost nobody's coming into the country illegally because all we really needed was a different president.
But we do need laws and there'll be a time for that.
That's basically what the cr was about this past week is give me some runway, let's get all this stuff worked out and.
Will lock it in the year holds.
Isn't amazing that two years ago the Republicans were put through a living hell because we have to change the laws relative to immigration. We don't have adequate laws. And of course Biden was saying, give me more power.
I can do it.
But that bill that Lansford negotiated one Republican with the Democrats, wh would have legalized one point eight million per year and institutionalized catch and release. So the idea was get the one point eight million or more all over the country. If flights would have cost of billions of dollars. And now it's quite clear the goal of Joe Biden or those operating his auto pen was to change the electorate in many cities, and that's why many came to Ohio,
many came Indiana, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin. They were putting them disproportionately in red states so that after five or ten years to legalize, and which would have happened if if Harris had won the presidency with Tim Waaltz, all of a sudden, here we go and the country would have changed fundamentally. As the President said, we didn't need new laws,
needed a new president. And right now the illegals are down to zero and NOL Salvador is accepting these so called alien enemies and they're going to house them in these terrible prisons. But their behavior got them there. They're not Americans, they're here illegally. They're involved in human trafficking, drug distribution, and rape, robbery and more. All these high end burglaries are being conducted by Chilean gangs and Venezuelan gangs.
And if the President needs to act, I can only imagine if you had to go to Judge Chunkin in Washington, d C. Or Judge James Boseburg and as permission to bomb somebody, or as permission to get an illegal alien out of the country and have each one needs to have their own hearing and their own trial. We're talking about two hundred and thirty six went down on Saturday. Two hundred and thirty six members of the TDA gang, the most vicious violent gang in South America, was on
a plane. And can you imagine two hundred and thirty six different trials with different witnesses.
How do you prove this?
It would take years, if any. But the president needs to act quickly, which is why he has the executive power, which is what the Congress says. Now, lastly, Congressman Warren Davidson, there's an effort by some of your colleagues, including Pam Bondi the Attorney General, to declare the activities of liberals and leftists to fire bomb Tesla showrooms as some sort of active domestic terrorism, which of course it is. It's done for political purposes. What is your feeling about what's happening?
Elon Musk, what's happening in Tesla? And by the way, I'm a Chevrolet kind of a guy. But nonetheless, you can have large numbers of leftists destroying millions of dollars worth of inventory of Tesla for political purposes. Should we treat those who are caught as domestic terrorists themselves and expedite trial for those who would burn down dealerships because they disagree with the owner of some of the stock.
Well, look, it's one thing when you go I'm going to boycott you know, pick your thing Nike or something because they're supporting Colin Kaepernick. But you know, if you decide to stop buying Nike Tesla, that's a different story than you decide to vandalize somebody else's stuff that you know, the Tesla vehicles aren't cheap, so there's a very large dollar value associated with the vandalism and damage in destruction, whether it's on a dealer lot or some private citizens property.
I mean, odds are good.
Until recently, people write a center generally weren't buying a lot of Tesla's. It was the left of the center of people that thought that the climate change was gonna the most serious threat to the world. I mean, you had the Secretary of Defense and Sherman had joint chiefs of Staff saying the number one threat to America's national security is climate change. Well, now you got all of them going out, Oh, I got to get a Chevy, I can't get I can't drive a Tesla. Get me
seen this. Well, they were full of crap when they were saying it in the first place. But the biggest thing out of this that strikes me is they say, oh, you know, Lon Musk has access to our data. He might steal my you know, you know, transaction information. This is a guy got had four hundred some billion dollars. Now he's only got three hundred something.
Now, oh woe was me.
This guy burnt one hundred million, one hundred billion dollars in total personal net worth so far. And that's just so far. So he is in it for the right reasons. And the guy's impressive. He's getting great results. He's over the target, and that's why they're panicking. Frankly, they're trying to use extortion on the value of the Tesla shares to try to get a long musk to cry mercy.
It's terrorism. And let's face that the American people are with Doge. One poll had him up seventy one percent, set it's time to cut down the bureaucracy. And another poll was mass deportations. Fifty six percent of the American people over the weekend in a poll with CNN, fifty six percent support mass deportations. So we're dealing with popular items except when you appear on CNN, now it's not
so popular. But Congressman, we have to run Warren Davidson once again, keep the faith and Congressman, Thank you for your service, and God bless you and God bless America.
Thank you very much.
Yeah, always an honor to join you, Willie. God bless you and all your listeners.
God bless you.
You wouldn't know it, Thank you, Congressman. You would not know it from watching the media. How popular the policies of Donald Trump truly are. And let's continue with more. Bill Cunningham with you every Sunday night.
Our iHeart Radio Music Awards are back tonight on Fox performing.
Money Long Nellie your host, Hello, Cool JayR.
Intervigual Award recipient, Lady Gaga, Kin Award.
Recipient, Mariah Carey You Award recipient, see Bro.
And we're celebrating iHeartRadio's Tour of this Century Award honoring Taylor Swift the Heiras Tour Why.
On Fox tonight starting at.
Eight pm and listen on iHeartRadio.
In this edition of The Marketers Report, Corey Marcisoto, Chief Market.
It's always good to have on a congressman getting beat up by CNN on set Daurn David you did on Winter Thursday. And at this point he comes on to explain what's going on. They're setting the records straight. Basically, programs must be cut. We can't afford the government that
we have. I'm sure according to the GAO, between two hundred and fifty and three hundred and fifty billion dollars a year, maybe as much as five hundred billion dollars a year is wasted through waste, fraud and abuse and dead people getting checks in the mail and paying sixteen hundred dollars for a hammer that costs about eight dollars at a hardware store, and so over the next month.
It is alleged to me that Elon Muskin is in its ban of renegades, is going to go after the Defense Department with the same alacrity you're going after a Usaid, and the same stuff's going to happen with a Medicare, social Security, etc. To get with or waste fraud and abuse, which by the way, will make the military stronger and make Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid more viable. When those who don't deserve it don't get it, more money
is available for those who do. You need to have a more lethal fighting force, we presently have to talk to the hooties. When you have a different president involved. Book I don't want a federal judge making a decision whether to attack.
Or not to attack.
But whether it's fly drones or not to fly drones, that's not a federal judges job.
But continue with more.
Introduce the Great Julie gunwalk us up next, still counting in with you with some news Radio seven hundred WL.
I bul to counting Hammigrant America. Let's continue now and once again the Democrats are at it. And a couple of days ago, there was a bill in the United States Senate which likely had little chance of advancing because the title of the bill was the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act. And to get this bill
passionate had sixty votes in the US Senate. That means there had to be at least seven Democrats go along to protect women and girls in sports, and you couldn't get one Democrat, not even John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, who's making more sense recently, which it shows how weird the Democratic Party is, even he voted against it. And so I would have thought it would have been a simple thing.
This happened on March third, for the Democrats in the Senate to say, let's protect women and girls in sports, because even Democrats they have wives and girlfriends, many girlfriends, They have daughters, they have granddaughters, they have lots of women around them. You would think I want to protect women in sports, and I find myself aligned with Martina Nevratalova, which is quite unusual. Joining you and I now is Julie Gunlock at the Independent Women's Forum. And Julie Gunlock,
welcome again to the Bill Cunningham Show. And first of all, Julie, before we deal with the votes, what was the idea of protecting women and girls in sports and why was that needed?
Well, it was passed many years ago. Title nine was a bill that was passed in order to ensure that women had similar opportunities and that they were protected and that their interests were protected when it came to sports in a school setting. And that has been chipped away by Democrats over the years, and then the Biden administration absolutely.
Took a.
You know, just destroyed it in the sort of to sacrifice it at the alter of wokism and the cult of transgenderism, which is we all know, allowing biological males into women's sports. So the Republicans have been working hard
to restore title mind. Obviously, President Trump issued an executive order, but the organization I'm with, the Independent Women's Forum, has been working for years now trying to get the actual definition of what a woman is codified into law, so that the original intensives of bills which nobody if you took, if you took a legislature a legislator in you know, nineteen seventy, nineteen eighty, nineteen ninety two thousand and said we're going to need you to find the word women,
they would have said, you're crazy. Nobody thought this. So you have the intentions of bills that were passed where it says, you know, women deserve these protections and uh and which are needed. You know, this isn't some sort of carve out. Women are physically not as strong as men,
and so they do need certain protections. For instance, we don't want men in our locker rooms, we don't want men in our bathrooms, we don't want men going to women's prisons, we don't want men going to women's shelters. But now, because the Democrats have insisted that sex distinctions be based on gender identity, not the actual biological sex, what you were determined to be at birth, it's become very cloudy. So now men who identify as a woman, which we know is it's insane, this is this is
all insanity. So essentially they've been able to sort of game the system, if you will, because the word woman is not find in law. And so IWF has been working at the state level to make sure that the word woman is codified in law and then applies sort of retroactively to all of these gills. Again, nobody thought that the world would go so insane that we need to do that, but we do need to do that.
Well.
The bill sought to amend Title nine, which was passed fifty three years ago, and it would prohibit schools from allowing boys and men to compete with girls and women and college because the idea was separate but equal. Sometimes make a lot of sense. Separate but equal. And I'm watching these women's basketball tournaments are going crazy.
It's a big deal right now. And so gender identity.
Let's face it, when you and I were conceived, every human being at some point was conceived, and when you and I were conceived, we were conceived in such a way that gender was identified at that point either xx or X, Y, that's it, and then it's revealed at birth. And so if you have a sonogram, you might see the little stem, in which case it might be revealed earlier. But at conception you're a gender gender slash sex is confirmed, and then it's revealed at birth.
But that doesn't apply anymore.
And in fact, one of these, one of these very effective democratic legislators, his name is the King Jefferies. He's not some backbencher, he's the Democratic Majority Leader of the House of Representatives. Said this is not the Women in Protection and Sports Act. This is quote the Republican Child Predator Protection Act. I'm thinking, waitmen, if people like you and I think women and girls should have separate, equal spaces compared to boys and men, that we you and
I are empowering child sex offenders. And he explain that the bail risked unleashing child predators on the children of America in sports.
What the hell is he talking about?
What is that?
Well, first of all, I mean, they're suggesting because the schools and universities are going to have to confirm that this person is a biological male or female. They're claiming that we're you know that we're going to demand coaches look down people, you know, kids' pants to confirm what genitalia they have, which is insane. Look, I have three boys. I know you have a boatload of kids. And every year when my children start playing sports, they need to
get a physical check up. I need to certify that they're healthy and safe and they can play this. I have to take them to the doctor, where the doctor then hits you know, are they male? Are they female? It's part of a regular physical. What they're suggesting is they're going to allow coaches again to look down the pants of children. It's sick, but I'm telling you right now, the Democrats are the party obedient and pedophiles and sick individuals,
total perverts, that is who they are defending. They don't care that many men who have decided I'm all woman have a sexual kink essentially and want to live out this sexual fantasy and they want to go and they want to intimidate women's women. They want to undressed in front of women, and they don't care. They don't care that this happens. They don't think that women need these protections.
It is absolutely signing I tell something else. They are telling women who you know, we always hear about like, you know, if you walk into a place and you feel uncomfortable, it really goes back to sort of an animalistic instinct that we still have of being preyed upon. I need to listen to that inner voice, right, you need to listen to it and walk away. This is very,
very instinctual, right, don't ignore those voices. And yet that's exactly what deemocrats are telling women to do, to ignore the voices in your head that say, you know what, I don't really want to see an intact male undressing the woman's locker room. You know what, I feel kind of preyed upon. I feel like he's getting off on this. And no, we are told we have to endure that, and if we feel uncomfortable, we're the ones with the mental problems, with the mental health issues. That's what Riley
Gaines went through. That's what these girls on these swimming teams, what these sororities are having to do doing to these young girls, what the medical profession is doing to young girls in it. And of course the Democrat Party, which again is a party that stands for purport and deeply disturbed, mentally unwell people who want to live out these sexual fantasies. You know, this is a serious problem in our country, and we have a whole generation of kids that have been damaged because of this.
Julie Gunlock, there's a study that indicates over one hundred thousand transgenders were checked out by the American Medical Association and they discovered, much like Europe has discovered, that when someone goes through transgender hormonal treatment and then surgery, it doesn't solve the emotional mental problems. In fact, afterwards there's more suicide, there's more alcoholism, there's more drug use. In other words, it exacerbates, aggravating a problem. It doesn't solve it,
It creates more problems. Why didn't that study get a lot more media play?
Well, and look, you know, I actually just wrote an ape about this called make America Trust Again, sort of a plan words American make America healthy again. And you know, we are never going to make American healthy if we don't restore trust in our public health officials. And I go through a number of things where examples of why we have lost trust in the in the medical and psychological industries because for years they said no, no, no, we should transition kids as young as ten years old.
We should cut off their healthy flesh in the form of breast and genitalia. We should make them lifetime pharmaceutical customers by getting them hooked on these these these puberty blockers and these cross sex hormones, which will again damage them. It will make them anorgasmic, will never feel sexual pleasure, They will mutilate their bodies. And the lie that these kids, well, you have parents being told do you want a living child or a dead child? A living transition to child
or a dead child. It is monstrous what the medical community has done. And there isn't trust in public health. There isn't trust in the medical and psychological communities because.
We all know they did this.
They have gotten behind this, they have gotten behind the Democrats, and they thought that they would get away with it. But we know now through the witness of people like Chloe Cole and others, these d transitioners who have come forward and said, my family was persuaded to do this, They didn't really want it. I was persuaded to do
this when I was thirteen years old. We know what is really happening here, and thank God for those very brave detransitioners telling their story, as well as parents saying, you know what, I was fooled into this. I feel terrible. It's so brave of them to come forward, but that is why we are in the situation that we are in the medical community should be ashamed of themselves and along with COVID, along with some of the nutrition science
that they have gotten wrong. There's never an apology, Billy, Nobody ever said, nobody ever says, you know what, I'm gonna do better.
I'm sorry.
I ruined the life of thousands of children who've been gender transitions when they shouldn't have been. No, never any look back, never any sort of contrition. It's really terrible. And again, this is why Americans don't trust the medical field, the pharmaceutical industry, and the nutrition science. They don't trust any of those folks.
I'll tell you what, Julie Gunlock IWF dot org. I watched the testimony of Chloe Cole, who was transitioned as a young child, and there's tens of thousands just like her. She found herself in a blue city and a blue state. Her parents said, let's do it. Their personal doctor said, let's do it. To a children's hospital. The hospital, the expert said, let's do it, and God help you if
you disagree. In fact, in California, and I think the Trumpster at his joint session had a mother there whose daughter was transitioned at school without her permission, changed the name in school. In fact, California's got a law that says that if you, as a parent oppose the transitioning of your thirteen year old girl to a boy, that the state can take away the custody. You can't be a parent anymore. And I'm thinking this cannot be happening in America, Chloe Cole. It's unbelievable.
And honestly, that is why I was physically ill watching Gavin Newsom act like he didn't support that. He one hundred percent supported the criminalization of parents who object to the transitioning of their children. And I will tell you here in Virginia, I live in Virginia. You know I live in Virginia. They're trying to do that here. They are trying to criminalize parents who object to this stuff. And it's not just parents speak of what they did.
Tory Haym, he's a medical he's a medical he's a doctor, and he objected to what he was seeing the transitioning of kids in his hospital, and they tried to the DJ tried to prosecute him for coming forward and being a whistleblower. There is a true sickness out there. We're winning this fight, Billy, we really are. There's a lot of great witnesses out there, and we are winning this fight. And there is more and more understanding of just how
damaging this is. But we got to stay. Jon, thank you, and I really do thank you for keeping this issue front and center. It's so important that, frankly, I mean, I mean, you're you're a national figure and well loved, but it is important that sort of alternative media really hammerd this home because the corporate media is they're in on it.
They want to do the children.
Now.
Lastly, I have about two minutes remaining. I saw this video of a planned parent a planned parenthood convention, and which doctor is a planned parenthood We're talking about selling the remains of dead border baby that they aborted, and one was a conjoined twin that they aborted, and talking about the price of kidneys, the price of the skin. And this is never going to see the light of day because it is so gruesome. The planned parenthood traffics
and dead body parts. You couldn't do it with a dog, but you can do it with babies. I could send you the video I watched about a minute of I couldn't take it anymore. But states need laws that would stop the trafficking of dead baby body parts.
Do you agree?
Absolutely? And that is what's so monstrous about this. Listen, they are going to say abortion, we need women have a right to abortion. We don't want to go to the handmaid's jail. We want so, we don't want to turn back to class back. It has nothing to do with women's They have to say reproductive rights. Okay, they're right to kill their child. Has nothing to do with this. It has to do with the money that is made
from these body parts, the planned parenthood. They are big business and killing babies and selling their body parts.
That's what it is.
This is all about money. You know, These these figures get up there and talk about women's rights and women's access to reproduction rights all that stuff.
Again, that is a lie.
It is a lie.
It is lucrative and it is and we're talking, we're talking Nazi kind of like experiments on human bodies on a boarded babies believe it is so sick.
It is so sick and so.
Sad, Billy, And again I appreciate you bringing that up, keeping this on top of people's mind. They need to realize what these industries do.
Well, Jolie Gunlock, thanks for coming on again and as IWF dot org. So much great stuff is there, and hopefully the education, hopefully we turn around the idea that those who want to protect children like you and I are not called pedophiles because we want to check the geniteeia of a seven year old boy. Not exactly. It's amazing they get away with it. But Julie Gunlock, once again, thank you for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show. And Julie, you're a great American. Thank you very much.
Ah he's a pleasure, Thanks so.
Much, God bless you.
Let's continue and let's put the light on these cockroaches and see what happens. The bugs run into the darkness when the lights shone on them. And the idea that you and I that think girls and boys should have separate sports in separate spaces, we're not the problem. It's the other side. O Cunningham, the Great American, Live with you every Sunday night.
Just imagine a resort with a day is yours.
First of all, Billy Cunningham is great American. Thanks for listening tonight.
I'm told now by my syndicator that we have about five hundred and fifty radio stations every Sunday night. And the reason we're getting better is because I bring on the newsmakers. Give you a different viewpoint, let your voice be heard, Listen to different ideas. You can't watch the mainstream media and think you're getting objective information from an impartial source. It's left doing propaganda masquerading is news, and
it's sad, but that's where we are. Newspapers are dying, television is in trouble, PBS is about to be gone, and what you have left will be and also talk radio, in which we're interactive. If you disagree with something you hear in the Washington Post of the Chicago Tribune New York Times, you can send a letter to the editor, but let's face it, it's not going to be published. If you see something on television you don't like, turn
the channel. That's why MSNBC is failing and CNN is terrible, and so at some point talk radio and the podcast are taking the place of what has to happen in order to inform the American people. And as I began tonight, about three hours ago, the President and the staff ignored a federal court order of that liberal DC federal judge demanding that two hundred and thirty six gang bangers from
Venezuela be returned to the jurisdiction of the country. But they were advised that because that flight to Al Salvador was over the top, in fact south of the Yucatan, that they didn't have to comply with the order. I would anticipate it's going to be ugly sometime later today or tomorrow to find the Democrats declaring again a constitutional prices of one type or another. When you don't enact the policies of the Democratic Party, there's a constitutional crisis
in reality. As you know from the polling, the Democrats are the lowest they've ever pulled in the last fifty years of CNN polling, and they're extremely unpopular. And the policies of Donald Trump are popular with the American people. To change the bureaucracy, to let women play women's sports and men to play men's sports, and have legal military without DEI all that other craft that goes on, and that exactly is what Donald Trump is doing, and I'm
proud to be one of his devotetes. Thanks for listening, and we'll see what happens the next day or two. But with the Democrats involved, it could be other. Go Cunningham with you every time, you know,