7-17-24 Willie with David Yost - podcast episode cover

7-17-24 Willie with David Yost

Jul 17, 202417 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Willie talks with Ohio Attorney General David Yost about the Republican National Convention, and what is being done in Ohio to protect children from radical transgender ideology.

Transcript

Don't cunning into Great American asque looks that flooding conditions all over the tri State done the storms, etc. Oh excuse me, the weather men are wrong. It's bright and sunny. No problem. Whatever happened. Couldn't do my flowers last night because I got flooding rains coming. Guess what, it didn't

happen. That's a different story. Reds Baseball off today. Back at it this weekend in Washington and Atlanta. And of course, last night Hunter Green gave up the decisive to run home run that tanked the National League All Star. That's a different issue. De la Cruz looked good, going one for two, but nonetheless, we have many issues percolating. And some of the reports this morning seemed to indicate that this was a Barney Fife moment for the

Secret Service and for others. Came out this morning or last night that there were three snipers inside the building where that cowardly murderer was positioning himself inside the building. I don't know how good snipers are inside buildings, but that wouldn't a good look. And I thank god Saint Michael the Archangel protected Donald Trump and he's alive and well. Many issues to discuss. Joining you and I now as the Attorney General, David Yoast and David Yost, welcome again to

the Bill Cunningham Show. Before we talk about the convention itself, where you're in Milwaukee, Before we talk about the Safe Act, your being sued by

the ACLU that ought to be a badge of courage. Give me your analysis as a law enforcement official many years as a prosecutor in Delaware County, now the Attorney General, and I'm waiting for an explanation as to how a sniper on a slightly pitched roof could take up a position to kill the President of the United States when law enforcement knew at least thirty minutes ahead of time,

maybe longer, that this person was suspicious. He had a ladder, had a backpack, had a long rifle going up the side of a building, and he's positioned there for a while. As a law enforcement official, how do you quickly analyze this situation. I'm worried about it, as you know, I was a prosecuting attorney, so I live and die by what I can prove beyond a reasonable doubt court. And we've got way more questions and

answers, right now. But I can tell you this. I look at this situation, even with the limited facts we have, and say, there's something that doesn't fit here, something is bothering me. We need an independent, professional, thorough investigation. Candidly, I think we need congressional oversight of the investigation. There's a lot of great people that I work with on a regular basis in the FBI out here in Ohio. But when I think about

Mary Garland, I think about the Reagan quote about trust but verify. Interestingly, Willie, do you know that the actually the full quote is always cut the cards trust and the most important part, don't be afraid to see what

you see. According to media analysis, there was an advanced team three days ahead of time on a Tuesday night or a Wednesday morning, and it said that building's got to be covered over there, and there was nodding in the head of the local effail, okay, we're going to cover the building. It was outside of zone one, which is lockdown. Zone two was outside. Why it was outside, I had on a Secret Service snipers a day or two ago who said that was about a one inch putt to hit the

president in the head. And that is completely unacceptable. When you're talking about Mary Garland, I trust him as far as I can throw them. I think you've said this many times. I know I have that the local FBI, this US Marshall Service, atf Secret Service, whatever, are the best.

It's the top that's the problem. And for those who say this was reckless, bordering on intent, I find it impossible to believe that law enforcement in Butler County, Pennsylvania would leave open the president's assassin route from that building to his head. I mean, he was shot in the side of the head and survived because of the trajectory of the bullet. Can you dispense with the idea there was some intent by law enforcement there to kill Donald Trump?

It's hard to believe that that could be true. Can I dispense of it? Know, there's too many questions we don't have the answers to, But never underestimate the power of incompetence. This was It's unbelieving. And here we

come Saturday in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Presidents Donald Trump's going to have another rally, and I'm thinking, well, uh, I pray to God that a different team of Secret Service agents on the advanced side followed through with their ideas and the courage of those of those the SS on the scene was unbelievable. That's what they're trained to do. Get your body between the assassin's bullet and your protectee, and I have great respect for those men and women.

Let's move on to the Safe Act, and I think many of us in Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana have had to deal with this in which schools and other institutions are trying to mainstream the idea that if you identify as a different gender nothing you've as a child. And if some I think you'd agree with me. If you're eighteen or twenty or thirty years old and you want to transition country, take the hormones, get something, cut off, get something.

I added, Hey, man, have at it. But when you're fourteen years old and girls and boys need protection in high school, explain what the Safe Act is and explain what the ACOU would like it to be. Well. The Safe Act says, in essence, no medical procedures to make irrevocable changes to your body, whether it's surgery or your body chemistry through hormone therapy. You're under eighteen and we do this all the time. Bill,

You're not allowed to enter into a contract. If you're under eighteen, you can't buy alcohol, you can't buy tobacco, you can't even consume alcohol legally without the consent of your parents. You can't vote even if your parents consent. Why do we do that Because teenagers are are still growing up there. They're half formed adults, and their judgment isn't ready to make irrevocable decisions, and it's not fair to make them carry that responsibility of making irrevocable decisions.

So that's what the law says. Regarding medical treatments and men and women's sports, boys and girls' sports, we have a prohibition there. The ACLU somehow finds this to be unconstitutional. I'm trying to imagine Thomas Jefferson and John Adams having a spiritual debate about the need to protect transgender surgeries for miners being part of the constitution of the state of the United States of America. That's not working for me. But we're in trial this week. The ACLU got to

start off there. The planetiffs, they, you know, candidly told some tragic stories from a couple of parents and their children, and my heart goes out to them. But the rule of law is not the rule of exceptions, and today we're starting on our case. We're bringing in our experts to show that this is not in disputed. In Europe, which is way ahead of us, they're walking back from this extreme ideology and medical treatment. And

we're also going to show that there are other tragic stories. We're going to bring in Chloe cole but Do transitioner, who's going to talk about how the things that were done to her in her vulnerable teenage years ended up changing her life forever and for closing a lot of a lot of adult options for her now that she's fully grown, and she regrets the treatments that she received.

So there are stories on both sides of this issue. The rule of law is designed to create a framework for us to be able to live with the best wisdom we have, and I think House Billed sixty eight he is that best wisdom. Let me give you the counter argument. And many many years ago I had on a mom and a dad with their son, and he was like eleven twelve years old, and from the time he was born, he played with dolls, he had a female ideations and so this family somewhat

well known family in Cincinnati went to doctors. And so if you have a situation where the mom and dad agree to the hormonal replacement and then ultimately surgery, you have the doctor saying this has got to be done because this is a this is a female locked in a male body. Then you go to a children's hospital and they say, yes, we've got a whole unit set up for this in which they begin with hormonal and then we get to be eighteen or so. Then you get things cut off if that's what you're or

added if that's what you're resire, and so one might say. Tony Benner makes this argument, we conservative libertarians want to give parents a whole bunch of control of their children because the state does allow us e job. So if mom and dad's if the child, the teenager says yes, mom and dad say yes, their doctor says yes, children's hospital says yes. Who are you, David Yost, as the government official to say no and let this mom and dad, the doctor, the medical system do what they want to

do. Who in the hell are you to do that? Answer the question? Well, I'm happy to And for starters, this isn't one official making a decision. This is the collective democratic processes of our society who are making a judgment call in a difficult area to be sure that the protection of children

outweighs the freedom of the parents in this case. These are irrevocable processes, and not to mention which not all doctors do agree on this, and there's a great deal scientific controversy over this, as you will see as this trial progresses. Beyond that, though, we have to get out of this idea that children are ready to run world, that the children are ready to run even their own lives. There's a reasonable word parents. There's a reason there's

a legal duty to care for your children until they're eighteen. It's because their kids. And the abdication of the judgment to a child who is half formed is among the silliest things that this post nineteen sixties progressive ideology has produced.

It just doesn't make any sense. And David Yoe's Attorney General. If you're a Jehovah witness and you say my religious beliefs indicate that I cannot permit my child to have a blood transfusion which might save that child's life, then the state intervenes and says the juvenile court we want you to make this decision for us, and therefore the parents are wrong. You don't have doctors saying it doesn't happen. And when you talk about the frontal life of male brains allegedly

do not fully form until they're twenty five to thirty. In fact, my wife tells me the frontal part of my brain hasn't fully formed itself at this point in my life. She still thinks I'm goofy, and so she might be half right. So I'm thinking, okay, there's all kinds of ways. The state steps in and says I know, mom and dad and doctor,

you wanted this to happen, but we can't. And the British Health Service has been at this for about twenty years and at the age of thirty five, thirty to thirty five, more than seventy percent of those who went through this say to mom and dad, why'd you let this happen? Because I don't want I want to have children now and I can't. And so we have a long history. And so the argument by the ACOU I think is wrong, it's ridiculous. But nonetheless I present to the argument that the

state's going to step in. What about the last issue. When I was a fifteen year old boy at Deer Park High School, I would have loved to go on into the women's showers the girls and after a tough match of soccer and identify as a female for like twenty minutes. Does this safe Act have something to do with keeping teenage boys out of the girls shower room after

a tough game of lacrosse? Doesn't the question answer itself? Well, I would like to think I got the right to identify as a left handed eskimo, but I'm probably not. But if I say I am, does that mean I can shower with girls in high school? Isn't part of the same fact the idea that you can't do that? You know? Yeah it is. And Riley Gaines was a championship female swimmer who was beat by Leah Thomas,

who was born with an x Y chromosome set a male. She talks about her experience, and you don't see this in the mainstream media because it's maybe a little bit much, but she talks about being with her teammates in the women's locker room and having Leah Thomas with as she says, a full anatomically correct male undressing with his genitalia only a couple of feet away, and how that made her and her teammates feel. It's so compelling. I just

can't believe we're even upside down and must be talking about it. What the hell's happened? I mean, I'm thinking Riley Gaines. I've seen her give testimony. I had her on about eight months ago, and I'm thinking, well, and when you're skinny up for these swimming competitions as college girls, these uniforms are extremely tight and one might say revealing. But to have a six foot four inch anatomical male in the women saying, of course, Leah

Thomas didn't mind that. Leah Thomas didn't mind at all, but the college co eds, the adult women, said we can't have this. I'm watching a lawsuit against La Fitness. A mom was in there. She's about thirty eight with two teenage girls and they're skinnying down to having worked out, and in walks Harry as Man and sits down and starts looking at him, and she's in tears going to the front desk, and the French desk told her, well that he identifies as a female. What And so now she's filed

a lawsuit in California, which you'll probably lose. What damn it, Ohio is not California? Would you agree yet? And not? Well, I'm not on my watch, it's not going to be all right. Well, thank you at David Yost and kind of get a comment from you about the convention itself. And you're down there, what the XT go? I see you in the see you on Fox News quite often. You're right next to the next Vice president, and give us a minute or two about what's happening.

It's electric all of Obviously, the Ohio delegation is ecstatic about JD. Vance being picked as the number two, but the entire place is just on fire. They sense that we're at a turning point of America and that the tide is turning our way. We're looking forward to hearing JD's speech tonight. He's going to introduce himself to America. And tomorrow night, of course, we're going to hear the defiant Lion, the wounded Warrior taking the stage.

David Yost, once again, good luck to you. I think you're a common sense attorney general. We need more of that. This case was in California. I have no hope, but at least in Ohio we have some. And David Yost, once again, thank you for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show. And you're a great American. Thank you, Dave. Good

to talk to you. Bill. Let's continue with more your reaction. Plus once again, Judge Kerry Bloom and Juvenile Courts issued a ruling that the boys who sexually assaulted and kidnapped a fellow student at Wyming High School will not spend a day in jail. Think about that. We'll talk about that later. At Cherman of the Red's News Radio seven hundred WLW. Prescriptions require an online consultation with the healthcare provider, wh will determine if appropriate restrictions

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android