Bill cunning in the Great American Of course, Warren Davidson represents a little part of Hamlet County but mainly goes up to Butler County and parts north thereof Who's got a more or less a relatively new district, and part of it is in Hamilton County, a large part is in western Ohio. But until then he was one of about a dozen US Congressmen voted to alice Speaker Johnson from
the chair, following the lead of Marjorie Taylor Green. Plus, we have so many other issues, and Congressman Davidson, welcome again to the Bill Cunningham Show. So can you tell the American people why you saddled up next to Marjorie Taylor Green and decided to alice the Speaker. Well, so there's two votes there. Her vote, her privileged motion, was to vacate the chair. That question didn't get an answer, and frankly, I didn't think it
was a good idea to v Kate Johnson. Now he wouldn't have got hired doing the stuff he's done. So it's a fair question to say, hey, why should we keep this guy? What the path that they did it with McCarthy showed this was a disaster. I tried to say, don't vacate McCarthy. I'm not saying he's perfect, but we don't have a good backup plan. And if there was any doubt about that, I think the events since then have proven we didn't have a good backup plan. And the same
as I did back in the fall, I did here. There's always this passive aggressive stuff in DC. People are never direct like they are back home. They'll tell you straight yes or no. In DC they have these passive aggressive plays like, well, let's motion to table it. Well, so what got asked a question is should we table the question or not? And I said, no, answer the question the question what should we vacate the chair? And just like McCarthy, I said, you know, we should
answer the question. I agree. I disagree on the motion to table. I don't even think it should be made in order when you're talking about a privileged resolution. And there was a large fight over whether to have what is you know, since the eighteen hundred's been part of Congress except for a little term there, and so that was the vote, should we table it or not? And I said no answer the underlying question, should we vacate the
chair, and I don't think so. I think we should do this in a more orderly way, and to fail to do it that way as a disaster high let So in reality, did you vote yes or no to vacate the chair? Well, I only voted no on vacate the chair one time because that's the only time it's been called, and that was against Kevin McCarthy. So I said no. There was no motion to vacate. That was
answered on Mike Johnson. The question was should we table it? And because the motion to table passed, because all Democrats voted for it and most Republicans voted for it, that we didn't get to answer the question of motion to vacate. We asked motion to table. So I've tried explaining this. Unfortunately, not everybody has the same literacy rate. It's all out there at Warren Davidson on Twitter or x and on Facebook as well, and in our newsletter
and other places. And look, it's new uance and it's in the weeds, and this isn't an era that tolerates nuanced very well. It just simple yes, night, yes or no or whatever. So you try to explain it, but that is my point on this question, answer the actual question, and it didn't get asked. It was asked by Marjorie Taylor Green, but there was no answer on should we vacate the chair? It was let's table it. Because here's what I'll guarantee you. I guarantee you all.
The Democrats wouldn't have covered on motion to vacate. They would have they would have not said, oh, I'm going to vote for Mike Johnson for speaker. They said, oh, we'll cover you by saying, let's table it. And that's why the passive aggressive play is so corrupting. It really isn't an honest answer and to the question that was actually asked, and so I
don't think it should have been able to be even considered in order. Some of the Republican side say the Republican Party has nice theories, but there's no practice or follow through. I had on Frank Larrose about an hour a couple hours ago, and seemingly there's some bill in they'll Ohio House that would ban foreigners from investing a lot of money in our state elections, and that couldn't be passed out of the Republicans. They have of a veto proof majority.
You got the marijuana issue hanging out there. This isn't your Baileywick. But in Columbus, it's been more than a half a year since we voted for recreational marijuana. I'm told to no closer now than they were six months ago.
So you got Republicans dominate everything and nothing gets done. And now the Republicans controlled the House of Representatives by finn margin, only one or two votes, and nothing gets done in Washington. And so this is a this is maybe your pro former question, Congressman Warren Davidson, But why vote for Republicans when what we want to happen doesn't occur. Well, look, everyone in the Republican Party runs on some form of you can check all the websites they
all noticed say that we want a smaller, more accountable government. But unfortunately, what you'll see that some Republicans will actually fight for is more spending, a bigger government, more government, and less freedom instead of what we actually campaign on for is more freedom and less government. And don't go by the words, go by the deeds. And that's why Johnson's surrender on the spending
bill was so bad. He came back to us and said, well, guys, I fought so hard and we didn't have the votes in the four corners. We could have sent an in turnover to know you don't have the votes on the four corners, and what are the four corners? It's not in the constitution. It's Mitch McConnell, Chuck Schumer, Jakim Jefferis, and Mike Johnson. And what we want to know is is at least one to three, not even two to two not We want Mike to be there,
the Speaker to be there fighting for it. And if you want things to change, the main power of Congress, the main power of the legislature isn't to hold hearings and make things famous. That's important. We just did that on the Weaponization Committee, to look at how the law is being weaponized against ordinary Americans and most especially against Donald Trump. Yeah, but that highlights one of the powers. That's the one that gets a lot of recognition. But
the power of the purse is the chief power. And if we keep surrendering on this, we're funding the status quo, which is bankrupting our country financially and morally. And that's why it was so consequential that we didn't do what we said we would do. We said that we were going to get a smaller government, and we said we were only going to fund a government that secures the border. The only leverage we had on that was the spending bill.
And so to surrender that negotiation, frankly, did deserve a fair question, a fair hearing, and a fair debate or is this the right guy to continue to lead our party? And the reality is the right time to have that debate is after we grow our majorities in November. So we have to do what we said we would do. Here's the bright spot in the House. In the United States House of Representatives, a majority of the Republican Party said, no, don't do this. This is a terrible idea.
We can't fund the status quo. Let's change course. And in the Ohio Legislature, look, Stevens cut a deal with Democrats to be the Speaker of the House. We are going to get a new speaker. There's no way Jason Stevens is going to continue to be the Speaker of the House. I can't imagine that the minority of Republicans are going to once again make the mistake of working with Democrats. Because we see the agenda. Yeah, is gone.
It wasn't Republicans that failed to address that foreign money. It was with the vote of Democrats in a small sliver of Republicans back Jason Stevens. And look, that's why Matt Huffman coming in as a new member of the House. The current president of the Senate needs to be the next Speaker of the House in the state of Ohio. All right, let's move on to the debates. That kind of hit like a bombshell. I hate the word bombshell.
I hear it all the time. Two or three hours ago that behind the scenes, the Biden campaign and the Trump campaign have now agreed on two debates. One debate will be on CNN. That'll be a road game for Donald Trump on June to twenty seventh. Then there's another road game he's going to have to win on ABC News on September the tenth. So the debates have been set outside the Presidential Commission. June twenty seventh, CNN, September
tenth, ABC. And a birdie whisper in my ear from the Trump campaign that there will be no audience, there'll be no third party, like an RFK junior whose brain's been eaten by a worm or no Trump remarks. In other words, during Biden remarks, the microphone will be off, so when one speaking, the microphone is off, et cetera. And the moderators will be chosen from CBS, ABC, CNN or Telemundo. So the Trump's is going to play two away games in front of home crowds. What's your sense
of the presidential debates? What the campaign agreed to? And a campaign official told me, Look, we wanted to lock in these dates so that later on Biden I can't say I can't make it, or I fell down the steps or I forgot. Now they want to lock in the dates. And secondly, they don't like some of the rules, but the Biden campaign to do the debates insisted upon these rules. The microphone is off when the other person is speaking, and the anchors come from CBSABCC and or Telemundo with no
audience. Is the Trumpster playing an away game? Yeah, I mean he's not in a fair fight, but I think he can win with both his hands tight behind his back here. I mean, look, the Democrats not only is this what's the official thing? What's going to go on behind the scenes, is the script writers are going to write the whole script. That's going to be the most choreographed debate in history, because it's got to be only Joe Biden can only read the teleprompture. I mean, he can't think
independently into the Extenny can. It's only because he's juiced up on so much drugs that is wrecking his body. And the good news is they're going to try to get one of these debates out of the way before the conventions. The bad news is, you know, that gives Democrats a chance to pull the plug on Joe and swap him out for somebody else, you know, head of the election. Right, they don't want that, the Democrats are going to do. But I think either way, what we have to know
is Donald Trump is the right guy to win this election. And I get Look, there's some hesitancy amongst some voters. Donald Trump doesn't necessarily represent the same style that a lot of people would like. Yeah, they love the policies, and you're like, how do you get that, Well, you got to get Trump to get the policies. You got to get Trump to
win the team that's going to put these in place. And frankly, you got to get Bernie Marino to be Sharon Brown so that we get get Trump's team fielded, and then we frankly, if we do those things, we're gonna We're not just gonna hold the house. We're going to grow the majority of hold on Sharon offense. They're going to be able to deliver the results. Congressman Shared Brown has cured cancer, diabetes, and he's taken the pen
from Donald Trump to seal the southern border. So this is somebody who's had some sort of religious conversion. He's like Saint Paul on the road to Damascus. I mean, this guy, all of a sudden is everywhere. We couldn't find him with a search worn for five and a half years. Six months before the election, he surfaces with these grey commercials about curing cancer, diabetes and working with Donald Trump? Is Shared Brown a Trump supporter? Am
I missing something here? Yes? No, it's the same playbook Tim Ryan tried to run. People didn't even know he was a member of the House, let alone a Democrat. And now they're like, oh, the Sheer Brown guy seems great. They're like, yeah, you know, if the ads are so good, you know, maybe he has a chance. But
the reality is. I think Bernie Marino is gonna be able to put the campaign together and the advertising that's gonna make sure Brown actually have to defend his record, and his record is perfect alignment with his longtime friend Joe Biden. Both of them have been in office since nineteen seventy two. They've been elected, That's all they've done. Although I will say Joe Biden was smart enough not to take his honeymoon in the Soviet Union. But they work together to
try to get the communist banker confirmed. Nobody made them do that. That's actually what they believe. So you know, hopefully we're gonna be able to get a majority that really can't make a difference, and I think the Bates are going to highlight those ideas are very different us. Lastly, as talk about the deficit, not very sexy. Nonetheless, we're borrowing about a trillion dollars every one hundred days. Nothing is stopping that from occurring. Under Trump.
The deficit went up about seven trillion. Under Biden, is going up about another seven trillion Under Obama. It doubled under Bush forty three. It doubled. Every time I look at doubles. Suddenly we're talking about real money, close to forty trillion dollars. The interest on that is a trillion dollars more than the Department of Defense. Neither party looks like they're willing to cut down on that. Do you agree. Well, look, this is the
reality. Everyone left the center thinks the solution is more government, right, which means more spending. And Republicans, like I said, they all know to say that they're for a smaller government. But the reality is a lot of Republicans, some of them will call themselves big big business or big national
security people, which means I'm a big government Republican. And they've convinced themselves kind of this alliance with all the people left the center and some of the big government Republicans is that the real threat to the status quo are people like me that want a smaller government. And that's how it stays bipartisan. We didn't get this if you had one party that really did believe and was willing to fight for a smaller government. At least sometimes you would get a smaller
government. But you don't. Every Congress, every president, every year, the government grows. And that's what we have to change. I mean, we have to get a government small enough to fit back inside the constitution. We could afford a government that small. And the reality is the states have balanced just like households do, and you have to pay the bills, you
have to live within your means. Taxation Republicans used to be united in supporting lower taxes or no increases in taxes because it was a cap on government, but they've long since blown through that. They keep spending the money anyway, and that's how we get this inflation. You can print money, that's true. We've printed a lot of money. And what you can't do is say
that it's going to buy the same amount of stuff. And everyone's living that, whether it's at the pump, it's buying houses, it's buying groceries, it's paying for anything. Your money just doesn't go as far. And that's because Congress keeps spending more than you have. And it is a tax it frankly, it's a tax on the people with the fewest assets, and it's
wrecking our system and it's dividing our country wrongly. People think, oh, it's rich versus poor, red versus blue, urban versus rural, and the reality is you're destroying the money so you fix the money, we can do a lot of good. Lastly, you're dealing with the law. Fair. It was one of those break the glass moments when the Democratic Party decide to prosecute the leader of the opposition, and they had a well coordinated effort by
Michael Colanjo Colangelo. Who's the guy from the Department of Justice. He's prosecuting Donald Trump in the state court. When was the last time number three guy at the Department of Justice under Biden went into a dirty, filthy, grimy in New York City courtroom on state charges to prosecute the president of the United States. You Fanny Willis is personally benefiting financially through a relationship with Nathan Wade
everywhere. I look, the Democrats have a break the glass moment. We're going to indict the leader of the opposition party and pretend as if there's serious charges here when there's not. When you get with their powwow there in Washington, what if people say about the prosecution, the persecution of Donald Trump and the fact the Democratic Party is gone there? Look, I think the American people see through this, and you didn't even really know what the crime is.
Falsifying business records. That doesn't get prosecuted, period. And the person that falsified them, if they were falsified, was Michael Cowen, not Donald Trump. So they're not even they're using him as a witness. They're not saying he's signed some ple deal in exchange for non prosecution. And normally that's a misdemeanor in the state of New York. And the records were modified in twenty seventeen. And the whole point that they're saying is they were falsified to
influence the twenty sixteen election. How do you influence the twenty sixteen election in twenty seventeen, And so they say there was a collusion, Well where was the conspiracy? That's not even charged. So the narrative does not match the reality. Nevertheless, that doesn't mean that you're going to get a not guilty verdict in New York. People don't trust that Donald Trump can get a fair
trial in New York. No, just like they know that the people from January sixth didn't get a fair trial in Washington, d c. And they know that there's at best a two tiered system of justice. So look, you know this guy French philosopher, Guy Frederick Bastiat wrote this about it, wrote a short book called the Law, and it's basically the law corrupted from its rightful purpose. And when they corrupt the law, you lose respect.
When the law is being used at odds with morality, you lose respect for the law because you know what's right and wrong, and you know, and I think, look, people are going to go vote, and I think, look what they intend for evil. I believe God and the voters are going to use for good. We're going to reelect Donald Trump. Well, the Democratic activists are all over the Trumpster and we'll see what happens. They
can't get away with this. I mean, it just opens up a Pandora's box in the future that the whoever's in power can indict the leader of the opposition. If the shoe was on the other foot and Trump was still in office and did exactly this same stuff against Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, the media would be up in turmoil. But because it involves the Republican and Donald Trump, they roll over and played dead, which the media does on a
regular basis. Warren Davidson, US Congressman, once again, thank you for coming on the bill. Cunningham Show. And with your permission, we'll do it again. Thank you, Congressman. Yeah, it's an honor. Yeah. Bless you and your listeners. God, bless America. Let's continue with more. And by the way, PG sitton Feld is out. The six Circuit US Court of Appeals freed PG Sittenfeld a former council member, and he should be freed and he should be allowed to make his appeal without serving prison
time. So PG sent and felled back among the living on news radio seven hundred WW do you have a massive tax problem? Are you paralyzed with fear, losing sleep and dread going to the mailbox? The IRS has an army of new employees who have the power to seize your asset.