12-4-23 Willie with Steve Huffman - podcast episode cover

12-4-23 Willie with Steve Huffman

Dec 04, 202316 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Willie talks with Ohio state Senator Steve Huffman about the Ohio Senate's attempt to alter the marijuana bill passed by voters in November.

Transcript

How to make a good woman steel. I'm an old woman, bless to make a see I want to be I'm hit a that I'm bad of the bowl, bad the b bad the bowl by Billy Cunningham, The Great America. Of course, about a month ago we had State Issues one and two. State Issue one was allowing abortion up through pregnancy ut the termination of the pregnancy at nine months, and of course State Issue two dealt with uh marijuana and making it similarly to alcohol. One was a constitutional amendment that the lawmakers

could not effectuate. The second one, which was recreational pot is something subject to amendment. Joining you and I now are State Senator Steve Huffman of District five, which is tends to be north of Dayton. He's also for thirty two years a practicing physician, and he's been a corner so he knows where the bodies are buried. And Senator Huffman, welcome to the Bill Cunningham Show. And first of all, can you make the argument that I hear some

say in talk radio that we voted on this thing. How come those Republicans want to change it? Can you tell the American people why it is proper to change it in fact, why it was anticipated it would be changed. Yeah, it was an initiated ballot initiative, and so it's in the revised code. So that gave us the opportunity, and many of us in Columbus field that that is why they chose that and not a constitutional amendment, so that we can look at it at the taxation and the homegrown and other things

like that to what's best for the people in Ohio. So when I'm looking at these articles and some of the materials you sent to me, one of the main things would be to eliminate growing marijuana at home. That it appears the people wanted to have home grow, yes, in a sense. But then I had on the Great Bill Sites about a week or two ago, and he mentioned that under the current law which was passed and to become effective December seventh, which is Thursday, that there could be as many as seven

thousand joints grown at home. And that wasn't the intent. So can you address yourself to what you're proposing relative to growing marijuana at home? You know, the bill that we just introduced, or it was a sub bill in a House bill that was introduced this morning, is to eliminate all home grown and we're going to have a great discussion on that and committee tomorrow and hopefully pass the bill out on Wednesday. But that's something still up for discussion.

But right now, it looks like the substitute bill has no homegrown because just as Bill sites, that Bill sites a very very smart man. You know, seven thousand joints a year and one household just seems to be a lot. I'm not sure that's for personal use. I have my doubts. Plus, we don't all I don't think we allow bathroom gin anymore. I don't think I don't think you can have your own intoxicans at home because purity, how much, what's the THC content? Those issues come into play, and

so growing. Does your crystal ball tell you that the bill coming out of the Senate in the next day or two will have no homegrown in it at all? I can say that we're going to look at that issue very hard in the next few days. I'm not sure exactly how it's going to come out, and maybe we reduce it to one plant in a certain area in a certain way. But you know, some of the things that I you

know in this bill that I'm sure I'll stay in there. Is that you're not allowed to if you have a daycare at your home, you would not be able to have a home growth there because we don't want to want it around children. Right, Well, what if what if a mom and a dad has four kids under the age of eighteen, say they're of tender years. Under the law passed by the electorate, couldn't they have up to seven

thousand marijuana joints in their home with children present? That is correct, And you know a lot of things that we're trying to do in this substitute bill is protect the children to you know, no smoking and automobiles, no public smoking because you know you don't want you know, one parent driving, one parent smoking, you've got two kids in the back seat. You know that's not a proper It's not safe for the children. And a lot of these

things are going to protect the children. You may be aware, of course you're up north of Dayton, but when you walk around downtown Cincinnati on a summer's eve, you're often will smell marijuana everywhere. And right now, that's it's been that case the last couple of years because the mayor and the city Council have told the Police Division and said Cincinnati to not enforce that law. Now, that is ridiculous because you can have cops picking and choosing which laws

to uh to enforce and which ones not to enforce. But practically the employer says, don't do it. And so on one hand, you're going to have parts of Ohio in which people may be cited for improper marijuana use. In other urban areas there won't be any violation at all. And you know, is that fair? It doesn't seem fair to me. But one thing that uh, you know, I'm sure that we'll stay in here is about

the employer. The employers in the state of Ohio have to have the ability to have a drug free workplace and to be able to decide if they want to drug test for marijuana or not drug tests for marijuana to protect themselves and protect their fellow employees. What about the tax rate, because we all know that if the if the if the dark market, the the underground has a lot lower prices than legal marijuana, that the market's not going to shift.

Do you understand, is the Senate understand you have to keep the legal rate of marijuana somewhat close to the illegal rate, so that users will use illegal and not the illegal. You know, I've dealt with the medical marijuana in that sense, and it's true for they're about you know, forty fifty thousand people that have a medical marijuana in the state of Ohio have never bought the product. In most likely it's because they're getting a cheaper on the street.

So we've addressed the taxation. You know, the ten percent that was an in initiated ballot was low compared to other states, and on our proposal today is it's up to fifteen percent on gross sales, with also fifteen percent on the cultivators. Senator Huffman, what happens to the to the medical marijuana those that have the car and those dispensaries dedicated to medical marijuana. Why would somebody

want a medical marijuana card if you can easily access recreational marijuana. Well, you know, and I've said for a long time when this started, was many people will drop that because they want don't want to go to a physician to get the recommendations. They don't want to go through the hassle to get to get the card. Because a lot of what we're doing in the sub bill is streamlining the process. We don't need to two government uh marijuana commissions

out there, one for medical, one for recreational. We don't need culture two different set of cultivators or dispensaries. We're going to you know, streamline the system so that each one participates in any other one. And you're right, many people will will go away from the medical program because they can get it also in the recreational or adult use. I would note that Fairfield and other communities want to pass a long quickly by Thursday declaring that no one can

sell marijuana. There'll be no dispensaries in their city. What survives was so called home rule in cities and townships and villages or maybe counties decide for itself to have no dispensaries at all. Yes, So I mean part of the medical marijuana program we had that was home rule that they can pass in the

ordinance that say we do not want dispensaries or cultivators in their jurisdiction. And you know, I go back to the casinos, because you know, twenty years ago, all we heard was if you have a casino, all the drugs and prostitutes will be right outside your door. Doesn't seem to have happened. It seems that they're legitimate businesses and they're all regulated. In all the

drug addict dealers are not going to be outside your medical marijuana. But as the state, I think we should respect that and let the local jurisdictions make their own dec so we could have a circumstance whether the entire county in a sense, could be a dry county, because that's the way it is. Would you be comfortable if county wide, some county commissioners said no dispensaries,

no cultivation in our county. Are you comfortable with that? I'm comfortable with that, but I'm not sure you can do it county wide because the local control goes to the local city or the local township. But if the whole county wanted to do that, that's what and if they don't, people don't like it, you shouldvote out those county commissioners. And that's why we are system the way it is. When I had on Senator, I'm sorry, when I had on Governor Mike Dwine, I don't know about four or five

weeks ago, just I think it was the day after it passed. He said, look, there's no need to run to hurry or rush this thing. Others are saying December seventh is like a drop down date. That's Thursday. It's in the law. Can you speak of the what's going to change on December the seventh, Assuming you and the Senate and the House and the Governor can't get together in the next forty eight hours to pass something, what's the status of this marijuana law come Friday morning. Well, that's up for

the legal people like yourself to finally look at that. But what I'm told is that in there are some provisions that go into effect thirty days after the election, which is on the seventh, and that would be that cultivators would get so many dispensaries, and if you have a dispensary, you get so many more of these, and also you're allowed to start home going on the

seventh. So that's why we have some urgency on some things, and we also have some time on others because the Department will can take up to a year to make the rules. So we're really looking at the things that we really need to get done by the seventh, but also going to get those other things done that we have a little more time on and you have a provision here about how to use the money, and you talk about hundreds of

millions of dollars. It seems like a bullload of cash, and it is, but on a state budget of fifty billion dollars, it's not really I mean, it's significant, of course, but it's not do or die.

What is the new proposal you have for dividing up the money coming in That might be in the range of three to five hundred million dollars, who knows what that number is, But what's your idea about chopping up the profits enforcement fifteen the marijuana, substance abuse in drug abuse, and ten percent to the safe driver program, and then the rest goes back to the general fund that we can distribute at any time for more law enforcement or more substance abuse,

whatever's needed at the time. Rather than put it in code, we're going to let the General Assembly and the governor make that decision every two years on what's best to use that money for. So the idea is to walk before you run, to see let's put this where. I think we're about the twenty third or twenty fourth state to approve recreational marijuana. Some have had great

success, some have not. In California, the legal headshops as they're called, have little or no business because the market is still a dark market, and so that would be a problem. But maybe the home grow operations in California might be different than Ohio. But for those who want to grow marijuana beginning December seventh, would that be legal? It would if we don't do

anything. And the one thing about home grown, it's my understanding, is a very difficult plant to grow one that you know bugs and a few use pesticides on the plant. You don't want to be smoking these toxic pesticides. And the other thing is is mold from when you're drying it out. These mold spores get on there that can also be talked. That can be very

dangerous to the individual that's using it. And so really you want to you want to have a product if it's sold under the auspices of the state of Ohio, that that is wholesome, as used as intended, and it doesn't have unintended fentanel or something else or mold in it. And that's the idea of prohibiting home growth, correct. I think that's a bit big part of it. Is is that, you know, we want people to have safe product. It's now that the initiative valid, initiative passed, but we want

it to be safe for everybody. So the law we passed will not be the law that takes effect. Well, that is what the Senate is trying to do. Well, we'll see in a couple of days how successful we are and if we can get to our fellows, members of the General Assembly and the House to agree. That doesn't sound likely to me. I'm used to having nothing happening in anywhere. I can't conceive of all that happened hapening in the next two days. But you're saying, Senator Huffman, you're saying

that's possible. I think. I think it's possible. I think the hard work of Senator McCaulay to get all these things together. Well, we'll listen to what people have to say on Tuesday and most likely come back with the sub bill on on Wednesday, and you know the plan of the President is to pass it out and see what We'll see what the thoughts of the House members say, and then if you've got to tweak it down the road,

you'll do that too. But that's that's to be determined. But unless something changes, there could be thousands of Ohioans having homegrown marijuana in their uh in their basements come Thursday and Friday, and at this point it would not be illegal. Well I'll tell you Willie, there are already thousands of people in the state of Ohio already doing that, but it would just be a little a little more legal. All right, Senator Huffman, thank you, and

we'll see what happens. But you're cautiously optimistic something can be done before Friday. Yes, I am. I think on the leadership of the President and Senator McCauley and others, well, I think we can get it done. All right, Senator, thank you very much, Thank you, take care, have a good done. Thank you all. Let's continue with more. And so what you passed, what you voted for, is not what's going

to happen. And then hopefully the Senate, the House, when he talks about the President, it means the president of the Senate in Columbus and all of them need to get on the same page very quickly. Let's continue. Two twenty four. Home of Your Bengals ten point Dogs tonight on News Radio seven hundred wlw Hey Rock

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android