Big Food and Beyond with Cliff and Bobo. These guys a favorites, so like to say, subscribe and rade it.
Five Stock and me.
Greatest gone Yesterday and listening watch limb always keep it squatching.
And now you're hosts Cliff Berrickman and James Bobo Fay.
Hey, squatch get hears is Cliff here? And of course you're listening to Bigfoot and Beyond with Cliff and very often Bobo. We just got a message from Bobo a few minutes ago saying to start without him. So hopefully whatever he's got going, he will get it together and join us in just a few minutes or in a few dozens of minutes, or perhaps even in this very broadcast, and perhaps not because it is Bobo after all, and we all love him for these reasons. AnyWho, we're gonna
hop into our guest here, our guest today. Is he really kind of a man who wears many, many hats, and all of them look good on him. He's articulate, he's intelligent. He has a whole slew of podcast. Man, I've got one podcast and I don't I barely have time to do that. But this guy's got like three or four. His name's Micah Hanks. His main podcast is the Micah Hanks Program. I don't know where he got
came up with that name. He also has Sasquatch tracks, purely Bigfoot sort of thing, and some archaeological stuff called Seven Ages podcasts. He is all over the place, and we are going to be talking about Bigfoot today. We're gonna be talking about his other interests, and we're also gonna be talking about u aps. In other words, UFO's
some of my favorite acronyms. So we're gonna be talking to him today about this sort of thing because it's been all over the news, and from what I understand, I want to get this clarified for Mike himself, and we'll get to that in the minute. From what I understand, the reason it's all over the news is directly because of Micah. So Micah, welcome to Bigfoot and Beyond with Cliff and sometimes Bobo.
Cliff, how are you, sir? Long time no Sea. I was very pleased to have, of course be able to spend some time with you up there in Ohio. Recently said Bobo isn't here yet, hoping he will come stumbling in soon, but again. We've got a great conversation in store and on TAT today.
Yeah, it's going to be fine. We have to do this every once in a while because Bobo is Bobo and man. And you know what, It's funny, Mike. I was telling you before we came on the air that, you know, I came down to this COVID thing again, and I've had all this slew of bad luck. I won't go too much into it, but you know, it's like like my bank account was hacked briefly, and then I had to miss some opportunities filming with Discovery Channel
because of my illness. And it's just like one thing after another after another, and I'm thinking, what in the world happened to me? And then I looked back and I said, oh, you know what, I know exactly what it is. I hung out with Bobo and apparently his chaos is contagious.
Yeah. Well, the other thing too, I think is you know, and I realized this early on after I met you, Cliff, you and I have a whole lot more in common than just sasquatch. We're also really busy guys who travel a lot, and busy guys who were travel a lot who try I have a lot seem to have these kinds of things follow them. I suppose now, if sasquatch only would become as evident and follow us as often as these kind of calamities, I guess we'd all have this figured out, wouldn't we.
Something like that, something like yeah, probably, Yeah, we're also extraordinarily intelligent and good looking.
Yeah, well indeed, yes, thank you sir, And that certainly applies to you so well. Listen, sorry to hear that you got COVID, and I really appreciate you making time for the conversation day in spite of that, and like we mentioned, they're in the intro. Of course, you've been
talking about the UAP thing. The kind of cool relationship to all of that and everything that people have been hearing about in the news recently is that you and I were together when a lot of that was still in the kind of behind the scenes stage, which is kind of cool. So we kind of have a unique relationship there too.
Yeah, that was the seth breedlove gig A monster what was it called? Monster something, monster Fest? Monster Fest.
Yeah.
I'm not good at these names. I'm not good at people's names or event names. I kind of know where I'm going, but yeah, the one out there in Ohio. You and I got the right, got our rides to and from the airport and whatnot, and you're back there busily texting and apparently you're texting about all this stuff because it was going to drop in the next couple of days.
That's true. Yeah, now I can talk about it. And also, you know, I'll just say this just because since you mentioned, of course for your subscribers, some of the sites you've gone out to and some of the footprints you've been finding, let me go ahead and state for the record, I am now of a mind having seen some of the photos from those locations. Cliff has shared some of these images with me. After seeing those, buddy, I'm pretty sure if anybody is in the running to discover sasquatch first,
you're probably at the top of that list. I mean, really truly incredible stuff you're finding out there.
Well, I appreciate that, but discover I mean, I take the John Vndernoggle point, where are the tact where it's the discovery is ongoing and it is happening right now. We're just waiting for the academics to.
Catch up right. Yeah, And you know that's the thing that fascinates me about both the Sasquatch or the relic tominoid enigma, and also UAP, you know, the artists formerly known as you f These are both topics to me that there's been quite a lot of information that is strongly suggestive, maybe without there being you know, unambiguous it would convince a physicist or a chemist type physical proof. There's still a lot of data that strongly supports the
existence of these phenomena. And it's like Thomas Kuhne talked about, and of course, like you mentioned John Bendnogol and his excellent writings on this, The Discovery the Sasquatch, one of my all time favorite books he's talking about. You know, sometimes it takes a whole lot of that data to accumulate and then all of a sudden, at some point, a straw breaks the proverbial camel's back and people go, WHOA,
what's all this data? People knew about this stuff for a long time before we actually accepted that it was here. So you're right, I think we're in that phase of discovery rather than reaching the point of discovery. Both with sasquatch and also with UAP.
Yeah, a bunch of the anthropologists and biologists are going to their faces will be covered with egg sasquatch egg yoke, and when the discovery does finally drop with sasquatch stuff. But in the meantime, all we can do, I think, as the citizen scientists that we are and the amateur community, is represent the subject as best as we can and as honestly as we can. Steer away from the paranormal stuff as much as we can when it comes to sasquatches,
because it doesn't do anybody any good. Ben and Oggle, even though he entertained some of those ideas, and he would he certainly spent some time with people who thought these things were paranormal, he was. It is biography, as he points out, put the best stuff out there first. Put the best stuff out there, because we don't want other scientists turning their nose up at the subject and walking away because people are saying they're interdimensional shape shifting.
You if we're writing teleborders or whatever, you got to put the best stuff out there first to get the highest level of interest from academics. And then if all that's stuff actually If any of that stuff is true, let it come out later. I don't happen to think it's true. But if any of it is true, we'll figure that out later. So let's do the good stuff first.
You know. Yeah, I'm right there with you in fact, And that's an important point of clarification that should be made early on in a discussion like this where we're likely to get into some of the end beyond on the Bigfoot discussion and with the UAP thing, because people always ask me, they say, okay, so you're, you know, really deeply involved in trying to get information from government sources, and of course you know, doing the citizen science side
of things with UAP. So you also look at relictomenoids or sasquatch. Are they connected? Do you think they're connected? Well, sorry, folks, I gotta say I don't. I do not mix these two fields. I mean, it would be really cool if there was some sort of connection, if sasquatches were Chewbacca pets, you know, that were being dropped off your own planet Earth. But you know right now there is of course no
evidence that suggests that. And really, I don't think that we benefit from trying to find you know, and I've heard people refer to it as a grand unified theory of the so called paranormal. Why do these things have to be connected. I don't think they have to be connected. I don't think that we have to see all this as some overarching mystery. I think that uap unto themselves and then sasquatch to itself, are too you know, fantastic
mysteries without having to be connected. So yeah, I kind of am in the you know, sasquatches a big ape camp uap. We're not sure what they are. They could be something extraordinary. Currently they just remain unidentified, but there
are no connections between the two. And yeah, like you said, very well, you know, put the best evidence for either of those or for any other anomalous phenomena that one wishes to study, you know, put the best stuff you've got forward, try and appeal to scientists so that these topics aren't completely ruled out of hand before they even have an opportunity to be weighed on their merit and studied.
Yeah, and I think that today's psychology for a lot of people is don't trust the scientists, don't trust the man. We want them involved, We want them involved. I mean, it would be really hard to argue, no matter what side of the fence, or no matter what your take on sasquatches, happens to be that if you look back people's involvement, you know, like like like Napier's involvement in the subject in the early nineteen seventies helped the subject.
Doctor Meldrum's current involvement helps the subject. Doctor Krantz's involvement helped the subject. We want more scientists, as many as possible, to give an honest look at the evidence because the evidence can stand for itself. Things that are true can take all the scrutiny that people want to give it and it'll still be true. Most scientists, unfortunately, take a look at the evidence and point out things like hoaxes or Ivan Marx's involvement or things like that and throw
everything out throughout the baby with the bathwater. We all know that hoaxes have existed. It's an unfair take on the subject to do that, unfortunately. But we want people to take a good, hard look at this subject because sasquatches are real animals, and the longer you look, the more you'll be able to see that that is true.
Oh yeah, absolutely. You know, I'm very inclined to believe that sasquatch is a real biological reality. I mean, and again, this is one reason why I've been so interested in trying to collect information from you know, federal government and state government employees. It's not necessarily, in my view that they are better witnesses in every instance, that they should
always be deemed necessarily more credible. But again, you do have in those instances qualified professionals, many of whom do have specialized backgrounds and in their line of work, if they have made an observation of a good candidate, for for instance, a relict tominoid. You know, I do think that for those scientists who might have been averse to the idea originally, some of them may find it compelling
when they hear will gosh. You know a lot of people who have worked for government, people who are members of the armed forces, people who work in law enforcement, they also have seen these things. So it's not just you know, again the you know, the drunks and the hillbillies out there in the hills who claim to see
these things. Know, there are a lot of people, a lot of qualified professionals, and one reason I think that that could help the sasquatch topic again is because we've seen that very thing happening, a sort of glass ceiling
breaking with unidentified aerial phenomena in recent years. Because let's just be clear, the government has always collected information about this, and this has been something that has been a very contentious element of all that for many years, but since twenty seventeen with a lot of revelations about to what extent the government has been involved, and the result being updating of reporting systems and attempts to try and end stigmas that have prevented members of the Armed Services from
discussing things that they've encountered, experiences, they've had, things that they've observed. It's really kind of helped scientists to say, well, Okay, there really might be something here. It's really helped them maybe become more aware of the fact that not only is this data a very large data set, but a lot of it comes from very credible sources, and hence
more scientists are getting involved. So for my own part, I'd love to see the same thing happen with sasquatch, where we get to a point where people say, okay, you know there is a lot of good data. The data, even if it's anecdotal, it comes from some very reliable sources, and therefore we can look at this and we can say maybe this is something indeed worthy of study. I think we could get to that point with Sasquatch. We
may already be getting to that point. You look at the accellent work that people like Amy Boo with the Project Zoo book effort and things like this. I mean, people are already beginning to engage with the academic community and they're taking note, they're taking interest. So that's very, very encouraging to me.
Stay tuned for more Bigfoot and Beyond with Cliff and Bobo. Will be right back after these messages. Bob, are you starting to notice thinning hair?
Who me?
Maybe a little a little hair left or a little thinning hair both, Well, I've got good news for you. Bobo Hymns offers access to prescription treatments for regrowing hair and as little as three to six months, so you can see a fuller head of hair like Bobo in the old days. By fall.
That'd be nice having a fresh fall crop to harvest.
So wheet Hymns offers convenient access to a range of prescription hair loss treatments with ingredients at work, including choose oral medication, serums and sprays.
Yep, doctors trust this stuff.
It's been clinically proven.
It's got ingredients like finesteride and oxidil, and that stuff can stop hair loss and we goo hair in as little as three to six months.
You can get started from the comfort of your own home, cave, motor home, or wherever you happen to be by filling out an intake form and a medical provider will determine if treatment is right for you. If prescribed, your treatment is sent directly to you for free.
The process is one hundred percent online, which meanss getting started has never been more convenient, and even if sasquatch can do it, it's so easy.
No insurance is needed and one low price covers everything from treatments to ongoing care. Plus treatment options start at just thirty five dollars a month. Starts your free online visit today at hymns dot com slash beyond.
That's hims dot com slash beyond for personalized hair loss treatment options.
HIMS dot com slash beyond.
Individual results may vary based on studies of topical and oral monoxidyal and finasteride Prescription required. See website for full details, restrictions and important safety information.
Friend of mine, Darren Nay, she's a high profile skeptic from the UK. He told me when he was visiting my home here. But we're going through the cast and all that sort of stuff in the garage and going over some of the evidence and whatever, and which of I believe he found very impressive. I mean, I don't want to speak for him, but that was my take on that. And he says, you know, Cliff, there's a
lot of scientists out there that are watching. They are back there watching silently, sitting there, watching what you guys are doing. And to me, that's that's horrifying because I look around and saying, oh no, I don't want them to see that stuff, like look at the look at the way the community, you know, presents itself. Look at the way that the loudest people are saying the most ridiculous things and all that sort of stuff. But the that point you're saying there is well taken because they
are interested. So there are scientists, there are institutions that are interested, which is why we all need to present the subject in the most dignified, intelligent, sober manner that we possibly can because the loudest, most ridiculous claims, which often get amplified by the media, they don't do anybody any good, especially our subject and the individuals involved in it.
No, one hundred percent. And again, that's one thing I really love about the podcast. You guys do again. You know, sane, rational but fun conversations that are engaging. You know they're getting people interested. I can guarantee among your listenership, I know those folks you're listening right now. There are a lot of people former government, current active duty military, scientific community, a lot of folks out there who are listening to
this conversation right now. You may not be putting your name out there and getting involved, but we know you're out there, We know that you're interested, and you know, I always just like to put it out to folks. You know, if you are one of those individuals, if you'd like to communicate with somebody, you know, like Cliff Orrye, we always invite you to reach out and your privacy will be respected if you don't want your information to share, but we do think it's important to be able to
hear from people like that. I certainly do because I learn a lot from people, especially those in these unique positions, whether it's you know, employment and government or in the sciences, when they have had an experience themselves or made an observation, you know, whether it's a relictominoid or you AP or whatever else, any kind of unusual or extraordinary phenomenon in nature. Those firsthand observations by really credible individuals to me have helped me, you know, shape the way I look at
the phenomenon and broaden my opinions about it. And also just it encourages me too, you know, when I know that there are people out there who have had personal relationships to this and they say, look, I was your perennial skeptic and then it happened, this is what I saw, that encourages me. It just, you know, Cliff, it drives me to want to look even deeper. And plus, you know, guys like you and I, our names are already involved. You know, we've already got our names behind this, so
it's too late for us to get out now. So we're happy to go out there and look for the stuff. If others can't.
Well, yeah, and you know, I mentioned earlier Matt Pruitt's book, and there's a section in there that I was reading and it never really occurred to me before. But he's absolutely right. And this is from his book The Phenomenal Sasquatch, where people ask why haven't they found them yet? And people I hear it almost all the time. I hear it almost every day in the museum, why haven't they got more pictures? And I was learning, who is this
they they keep talking about? And Matt Pruit brings up it's the institutions, because people, human beings have this inclination to basically give away our own power essentially to other institutions, whether there's the state or the church or the school or whatever like that, they give away our own I'm I'm not sure what the word I'm looking for is, but that they look for other people to be the
authority figures so we can believe them, you know. And by having governmental or scientific establishment involvement in the subject, it satisfies that need for those people who perhaps need somebody else to validate something for them. They have not gotten more photographs because of this, or they have not proven that because of this, and I think that that in itself is a huge boom to the subject in
the same way. Like, for example, another parallel thing which I think drives the same point home is for a long time with say Matt Moneymaker, Matt has always been very very focused on footage, whether it's photographic or video footage, and I'm thinking, well, that's not going to prove anything. And I brought this up with him, and Matt's a good friend. He's very intelligent. I know what. Perhaps he rubs people, some people the wrong way, but he's very
logical and he's very very intelligent, hyper intelligence. So I asked him, so, like, what why are you always so focused on that instead of actually proving one and killing one, which I don't want to do that either, mind you, but that's I understand, that's what's going to take right He goes, well, because first of all, he's not going to kill one either, he's not really a gun guy
or anything like that. But secondly, he says, because photographs are going to increase public awareness about it, and that in itself is a good thing because it'll get more and more people. Because the scientist, the establishment is made out of the public and so the more people that are interested, the more enthusiasm there is for the subjects,
the more people thinking that these things are real. Just by default, more people in these institutions and seats of power are going to be interested in the subject as well. And I think that's that's one of the benefits of the institutional approach that you're talking about here.
Yeah, I agree, and I'll make a couple of points about that. You know, one thing about the institutional side of things is that, yes, it does present a degree of legitimization, right, you know, we see okay, well, you
know official people, agencies take interest in these topics. Now again, I'll be clear, having you know, worked for several years now filing Freedom of Information Act requests, public Records Act requests, things like that on a range of different topics that relate to everything from UAP to missing persons and you know, crime and also of course, yes, relict tominoids or Sasquatch. I can tell you I have found no evidence of there being you know, some elite group government who's really
serious about trying to find Sasquatch. If anything, it's just the opposite. I don't see a tremendous amount of evidence. In most agencies when I write to them and look for information, I mean, they're straight up and they'll say, we don't keep records actively on that subject. But sometimes they'll also follow that up by saying, but we do actually have a few things that our wildlife biologists or you know, this division or that division have kept in
formally and we're happy to pass that along. And you know, sometimes you get stuff. So one thing I often caution people about is using the presumption that well, government interest therefore legitimizes, and or we can presume maybe that even if they aren't forward facing with their interest, if we do some guests work and presume that maybe they have stuff and they're hiding it, then all we've got to do is we've just kind of try and pressure government,
and eventually all this stuff will be released. I mean we've seen that for years with the UAP thing. People constantly trying to say, well, you know, if we just continue to put pressure on lawmakers and write to our elected officials, tell them this means something to us, eventually we're going to have the big D word disclosure. You know, I'm not so sure, first of all, that there is as much in government holdings, although recent news seems to
suggest that there is potentially quite a lot. Maybe we'll get into that, But I've always been very cautious about presuming that there's a whole bunch of stuff being withheld from the public and that the only avenue that's worthwhile is leveraging pressure against government to get them to release it. And here's why, because at the end of the day,
one of two things could happen. Either they have it and they won't release it, or they don't have as much as you hoped for, and then what have you done. You've wasted so much time. So, especially when it comes to the relatominoid thing, you know, citizen action, citizen science, that's incredibly important, And the same goes for UFOs, you know it. Love more people out there, even if you aren't a scientist. Per se go by a telescope, you know,
learn a little about the night sky. Educate yourself online in astronomy, you know, and learn things like this. Learn about meteorology. Learn about relevant areas of science. Learn what to look for and what not to look for. If you're interested in sasquatch, learn about you know, man tracking, learn about biology. You know, study different animal behaviors, learn
about wilderness and survival, training, things like this. You know, that's so important because I worry sometimes that if we put too much emphasis on the institutional, we may miss some great opportunities and some headway that we could be
making ourselves. So again, you know, being a weekend warriors an important aspect of this too, getting out there in the field, getting your feet, money and having a good time whether or not you find sasquatch, but of course always attempting to try and contribute in that way too.
Yeah, like empower yourself, because that kind kind of goes back to one of those points I was I kind of tangentially touched upon, is that people give their power away to these institutions. And it reminds me of my friend Tom Powell, who I disagree with wholeheartedly about sasquatches. He's very paranormal, but he always says, it's really easy to convince yourself sasquatches are real, it's really hard to convince other people. Not that I think that's a fruitful
adventure anyway, Who cares what other people think. There's people that will argue with you that the Earth's flat, who cares what other people, right, But it's really easy to convince yourself. And the more you educate yourself on skills like bushcraft or astronomy or outdoor things or tracking or whatever, you're gonna be out there in the right habitat doing what you need to do to be around sasquatches, and then maybe you'll have an experience that will eventually end up convincing you.
Yeah. Absolutely, And you know, think about this too. I mean, how many people who have those experiences were not out there looking for the phenomena they end up having the encounter with. In fact, I mean, and I would maybe just guess based on my own experience from collecting accounts from individuals. Sadly, I've never seen what I think is unequivocally a UFO. I certainly have never seen anything I
think was related to sasquatch. But most of the people who I've spoken to who have and who share those experiences, you know, they weren't out there looking for it. Again, in the case of those in government who had those experiences, most of those people never even would have hazarded to guess that there could have been something like sasquatch when
they had their encounter. And that's what's really interesting about it is it seemingly took them completely by surprise and entirely off guard, having had no expectation of ever seeing something like that, and then it is just thrust into their reality. And again, you talk about a paradigm shift on a personal level when somebody who was not even a skeptic, it's more like they just never even thought about that and then all of a sudden they're looking
at sasquatch. And those are to me some of the most incredible encounters.
You know, as far as a government agencies and whatnot having this information, whether we're talking about UAPs or sasquatches or whatever like that, I can totally see them collecting a lot more data on UAPs because number one, it could potentially be a security threat of some sort. And I'm not talking necessarily about you know, extraterrestrials or interdimensional consciousnesses or whatever, you know, like that sort of thing.
I'm talking about if say an unfriendly national power got hold of technology that was we couldn't tell the difference between that and and the UFO stuff, Like if say these these deemed quote unquote you know, foreign enemies had access to technology like that. It would scare the willies out of the US government, of course, but also probably even more of more interests. And this is the cynical
cliff guy. You know, I think they see dollar signs when they see that sort of stuff, because I think a big portion of our economy is driven by by the military and industrial complex. So much money is there, so many people are employed by the government in that sort of way that they have a super high interest, whereas poor old Bigfoot, you know, there's I don't think there's a lot of money to be made there for them.
You know, it's going to cost a couple industries a little bit of money, like logging or road building or things like that. But for the most part, there's not like there's not like, you know, billions of dollars on the line when it comes to sasquatches.
Yeah, those are really very important points to make again, you know, sasquatch. As fascinating as that possibility, is the recognition of its existence. If anything, And this is by the way, in no way by intent on my part to espouse some conspiracy theory. I don't really generally think that using conspiracy theories necessarily help an argument, and so you know, great philosophers would tell you don't appeal to
conspiracy theories when you're making those. So all that said, I think that it's very likely that a lot of industries would potentially be more harmed than helped by the revelation that a creature like sasquatch exists, which you know very much like you're pointing out logging industry. Think about issues that this might raise for the national parks. Right now, we do have some park officials at various different national parks around the country that are kind of beginning to
embrace sasquatch. But they're using it, and I think this is a good idea. They're using it as a fun kind of educative thing it means by which to get people interested in getting out into the forest and enjoying nature, and that's good. I don't think though, it should be something that you know, is just entirely just treated whimsically. Again, I take very seriously the idea that there is a
flesh and blood biological reality to sasquatch. But if it's helpful in terms of getting people out there into the woods, hey great, I love it. But like you mentioned, Cliff with regard to you AP in terms of relevance to government interest, here we don't seem to have a intelligence or even if we say that sasquatch is maybe more intelligent than the average animal, but still quote unquote a big dumb ape in terms of its relation to humans, we still have a very unique organism that alone is
not interesting enough to government. Whereas with you AP, we appear to have a technology, something that was highly intelligent that must have produced this technology. Whether that be of an earthly provenance or from someplace else, we just don't know. And so, like you said, we cannot risk the possibility that a country like China or Russia might have made
some sort of incredible technology. You know, they could have seen some sort of incredible technological development and done so in relative secrecy that the US has not yet learned about, but that we're beginning to observe. And that's what some of these UAP are. Yeah, they don't want to take that chance. And so it's obvious why UAP is of greater relevance to government. But I think it gets lost in the mix, though. Is that a lot of the
more skeptically inclined look at the topic. These days with the recent developments that have occurred, and they say, look, you have the DoD with its newly established All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office. They're saying a lot of these phenomena that they're observing and that they're collecting information on or balloon like or drone like, it's probably because most of them are balloons and drones, and those are probably balloons
and drones being operated by foreign adversaries, not extraterrestrials. Point taken, and again, in the interest of national security, they're going to look at that possibility because that's what's most directly pertinent to ensuring the safety of this nation. So it's obvious why they would be looking at anything that seems out of place or potentially concerning anything that challenges our airspace.
But there's always that possibility in many intelligence officials, knows us among them, the Director of National Intelligence, Avril Haynes, has recently said, yeah, but we're open to the possibility that some of these things, and make no mistakes, some do seem to display capabilities that are not easily reconciled in terms of known technologies. We're open to the possibility that some may come extraterrestrially, so I understand why government
would be more interested in one. But bringing that back down to academia, to me, the idea that a non human again, whether we call sasquatch intelligent or not, that a non human species is in our midst. That's another one of those commonalities we have between UAP and sasquatch, the potential that we're going to discover something that's closer to humans than anything else we've ever seen in that in any case, either way it goes, would be the greatest discovery of all time for the sciences.
To me, stay tuned for more Bigfoot and Beyond with Cliff and Bogo will be right back after these messages. For me, the first that at least the first like a high resolution look of like the modern age of all this sort of thing to me was the Podesta emails. This is during the Hillary email leaks, where in Wikipedia got to hold everything and put it all out and I say, oh, those are out there, and someone mentioned to me, yeah, look up UFOs, it's going to blow
your mind. A says okay, cool, I did it. That's where I first heard of UAPs, for example, and they had academics from institutions sending emails and corresponding with government agencies about things like quote unquote celestials and interdimensional intelligences and this idea that they're trading non nuclear or nuclear non proliferation for technology and things like that, and when like, oh wow, look at that. That's some crazy stuff going on,
and this kind of rote it off to that. But here we are today where a lot of this stuff is becoming declassified. I think as recently as yesterday, I was scrolling through Twitter news feeds, and I'm seeing that the House is trying to pass sort of legislation about them not withholding and correct me or from actually refine. What I'm saying is, I know there's something going on, and you probably know far more about it than I
ever will. The House is trying to put some sort of legislation forward to saying that you can't withhold like basically extraterrestrial technology from them. And it's just this phenomenal time. So what is the current state of this subject in the government as far as you know?
So right now you correctly point out that again Congress is back in the game. They really have stayed in the game, and the last several National Defense Authorization Acts, which is basically the big defense spending bill that's signed into law by the President each year, and it provides kind of the roadmap for where the armed forces go
and you know what the DoD will do. Basically, for the last several years that bill has included UAP related legislation, and now there is new draft language that will go in the twenty twenty four bill, which is dealing with
exactly what you're talking about. It's aimed at trying to deter Furman if and also to provide a means through which information about craft of non human origin if it exists, and that's the term they like to use these days, because they're saying, we aren't sure if it's necessarily extraterrestrial.
We just know that, according to what some have said in recent days, that there are purportedly craft of non human origin that the government, perhaps some contractors, special excess programs and things like this, may have knowledge of, may actually have acquired and now have in their possession. And so Congress is trying to create essentially a means through
which that can be revealed. Now to back up just for a moment, because you make a really good point there, Cliff, Like you mentioned the Podesta emails that were leaked, like yourself, and I don't know why more people don't bring that up. I found those really interesting. Podesta had been in contact with a lot of interesting people and at that time that those emails leaked. We should point out again those emails I believe were actually made available online by wiki leaks.
This was for political reasons because this was during a very contentious election year. Podesta, of course was a part of the campaign that was actually attempting to elect a president at that time, Hillary Clinton. She ended up losing the election. But in the midst of all that, there were these emails from Podesta regarding these meetings he had
been having with individuals. One of those individuals, for instance, had been Tom DeLong, the former guitarist and singer actually he's back with the band Blink one eighty two now, who went on to form this organization called to the Stars Academy of Arts and Sciences. But he had been bringing with him to Washington to meet Podesta a guy named Major General William McCaslin, who at the time oversaw
the scientific Division at Right Patterson Air Force Base. So Basically he was in charge of about eleven thousand employees, I believe, and they oversaw the science division within the Air Force. They're at right pat and they were going to meet Podesta to talk about UFO's in the middle of an election year. I mean, there must have been some genuine interest in something for that to have been occurring.
Now fast forward to twenty seventeen. The following December, of course, there was an article that broke in The New York Times that was by a couple of authors, Leslie Kane and Ralph Blumenthal, who happened to be the authors of an article that was recently published by my publication, The Debrief,
which is available online at the debrief dot org. That publication featured their latest offering, which entails the claims of a former member of government who worked for a number of different organizations, the NRO more recently the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, and he was a liaison to what was called the UAP Task Force, which was officially sanctioned back in twenty twenty under the cognizance of the Department of the Navy, but it was basically the UAP investigative component
within government. It's since been replaced by the Al Domain
an omaily Resolution office within the DoD. When the UAP Task Force was in operation, David Grush had been the liaison for the National Geospacial Intelligence Agency, and that guy has now come out and in Kanaan Blumenthal's recent article that we published, has said, Look, while I was doing work in relation to the UAP issue for the task Force, there were several insiders that came to me and they said that they had knowledge of a program, and that
this program involved the acquisition of and maybe also things like reverse engineering and things like this, but essentially that there had been acquired craft that are believed to would be of non human origin, and this information has been illegally withheld from Congress and thereby of course from the American people. So the long story short, he decided to file an official complaint with the Intelligence Community Inspector General. And what this means is that he is thereby going
the entire thing is going to be investigated. But if he were to be found guilty of making, for instance, false statements about all this, if that were the result of this investigation, I mean he could be held criminally liable for doing that. So he stands to lose nothing. I mean, he loses everything actually if he has misspoken, if he is told any information and is found to have knowingly done so, he doesn't gain anything from lying.
So many people are looking at this saying, well, well, you know, I mean, given those circumstances, it definitely seems like he believes the information that he's provided to Congress, or rather to the IC Inspector General. He seems to believe that this information is true. We've got to wait and see what the results of this investigation will be.
But that is essentially what has caused, like you said, Cliff, Congress now to get involved in They're already drafting legislation to try and say, hey, look, if this stuff has been going on and we haven't been informed, we need to know about it. And then as recently as just the last couple of days, Senator Mark or Rubio of Florida has also come out and said, look, he's not
the only whistleblower we've spoken to. There are others that have told us very similar things about so called legacy programs. So they do seem to think a lot of information may have been withheld from Congress. Of course, from the American people and now elected officials are trying to get to the bottom of how much and indeed if all that information can be verified.
And just to catch me up, because I'm not in the UAP game. I'm just a humble, little bigfoot of looking for prince in the woods for the most part, just as to catch myself up. This is what we were talking about now is essentially the central hub of the last say two weeks of UAP whistle blower news. Is that correct? Like the wid when I look at whistle blower blah blah blah, UAP, Sup, this is exactly what you're talking about.
Right, This is exactly what we're talking about. Yeah. In fact, I think the listeners will appreciate this. The weekend that I was working with the two authors, Caan and Blumenthal, they approached us about this article for various reasons. I think it had been somewhat erroneously reported in the media that well, they've gone to a bunch of big public publications and they all turned it down. That's not actually accurate.
There had been several publications they've been working with, but the name of the whistleblower had leaked online and while many of those publications said, well, we need more time. Caina and Blumenthal were concerned about various aspects of what could happen if they waited too long. But make no mistake, many publications, including The Washington Post and Politico had been approached.
They also wanted the story, and I'd been informed about that before we actually ended up accepting it for publication ourselves. My advice had been, look, get it in the biggest publication that will take it. But time became a concern for the authors, and they said, you know, we're going to lose the story if we wait too much longer.
When they approached me and said, would you be interested in having your publication print this, I said, on the condition that my team can independently vet those sources go through all the background checking, which we had enough time to be able to do. But it was quite an interesting time because while my team was doing that, I was handling the editorial side of things, you know, having phone calls with the two authors getting things lined up while you and I were at an event together.
Yeah, monster quest gets in the our monster fest, you know, gets in the way.
Literally, as Cliff and I are riding to the airport, on Sunday with our pal Aaron DS. You know, I'm seeing these incredible footprint photographs you're showing me in stuff. Let's just say that there was the weight of the world on my shoulders at that time, my friend, and so I'm glad to be able to come out and now say, yeah, this is the story everybody's been hearing about.
And I think that the net result has been positive because, like Marco Rubio said in the last couple of days, if grushes, you know, if he believes what has been said and what he has been told, and if any of that ends up being true, it's going to be really important. Again, like you said, it might not impress everybody out there, but I'm sure there are going to be a few scientists and you know others and you know official theom that are going to find this really important.
It's going to be arguably the hugest story in all history. But if it ends up being the case that someone has misled him and there's someone in the upper achalons of government who is you know, seeding bad information, as Mark Rubio said, that too should be investigated. So I think this is very important to get to the bottom of whichever direction the investigation goes. But yes, this is
the whistleblower story everybody's been hearing about. And again, this is the strange and small world that we live in. The Cliff and I were in a car together the weekend this was all coming down.
Yeah, yeah, it's pretty it's pretty wacky. Man, life is like that. So this is all, you know, moving through the halls, the halls of power basically in Washington, DC at this point, and those wheels churned very very slowly. So but it's all coming down the next couple of months, probably, What would you expect or what are some of the things that one might expect to see over the next couple of months sort of hear about.
Well, as some like I have mentioned Marco Rubio, also US Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, who has really kind of led the charge with drafting legislation for the
various bills that have featured UAP related language. Several members of the House and Senate have been really active with all this, And so right now, what I would expect to see is, indeed, we're going to probably see bipartisan language that's going to go into law it'll be signed into law in early twenty twenty four in the next NDAA, But in the meantime, the current language for this year's
bill already has wait for it, a whistleblower provision. So it's no big surprise that people are starting to come forward and talk about this because it had been included in the language of this year's bill that there should be protections for anyone who has knowledge of any kinds of special access program you know, programs that have been kept out of the purview of not only the public, but many in government too, And if individuals from those
programs or people in other areas of government have knowledge about this, they are essentially offered protections for coming forward and informing Congress about it. So there are already elected officials saying there are others who have spoken about this, some may be coming forward. I would say that what we can expect, probably in the weeks and months ahead, is that we will probably be hearing from some others,
and certainly we'll see some more bill language. But again, the question I guess on everybody's mind is when is there going to be unequivocal evidence that supports these claims. One of the issues of people have raised is well, you know, Gresh says that he has provided documents in the form of classified information transcriptions and things to the Inspector General of the intelligence community. Everybody wants to see
the UFO photos and the videos and stuff. You know, I'd like to see those two and we have seen a few. There were a few that were released. Of course, there were first leaked in twenty seventeen. They appeared in the New York Times. One of those three videos had already been floating around for years, and that's the famous tic Tac that was filmed off the coast of California.
Still a really interesting video in my opinion. And no, I don't think it's a pelican or anything else that a lot of the skeptics have made it out to be.
Maybe they actually try to say pill ackin because it does look like a pill.
That's what I meant, Yeah, pillican, of course. I mean, you know, there've been all kinds of different suppositions about what it may be. The bottom line is it's unidentified. I mean, currently the DoD Stell characterizes that one as unidentified. They don't know what it is. And we could come back and talk about that in a moment, but again in the immediate sense, you know what we can expect
to see. I would hope maybe that we'll see some additional video, photographs and other things that might help substantiate some of the claims, But certainly for the time being, will probably be hearing more about Grush and what he is reportedly learned, and there may be some other whistleblowers who have similar stories who'll be coming forward in the days ahead as well.
Stay tuned for more Bigfoot and Beyond with Cliff and Bogo will be right back after these messages. Now, how is what is unfolding here in the United States paralleling what is happening in other places? Like wasn't it Chile who declassified a lot of their UAP stuff a few years before the US?
Yeah, I believe they may have, and of course Brazil did. And you know, I've spent a lot of time done in Brazil. I think I had to miss an opportunity to go squatch and maybe with Matt Pruitt because I was in Brazil a couple of years or actually I guess it was probably early last year, and I've spent enough time down there and gotten to know some of the former lawmakers who were interested in this subject in Brazil, their national archives both say impressive collection of government documentation
about their experiences and their interest in this phenomenon. And it's funny because I have seen some who have said, you know, this is a culture bound phenomenon. There's a reason why only the United States and its citizens claimed to see UFOs, and only its government is actively pursuing answers about this phenomenon. That's not true. These things certainly have been seen in other parts of the world, and
other governments have taken interest. Quick example, since we were talking about Brazil, we had back in the nineteen seventies, so many residents along this little coastal town in northern Brazil called Kolaris that were alleging not only that they were seeing objects, but several of the residents claimed to have actually been accosted by these things. You know, again UAP attacks. There aren't frequent occurrences, but they do happen, and the islanders down there at Kolaris were saying that
this had happened to them. Now the Brazilian government responds to this and they put together what at the time, and my Portuguese is terrible, but therewith me opera sal Pratu, which essentially translates to mean Operation Plate or Operation Saucer. There was an official Air Force Brazilian Air Force investigation into these incidents. There were some photographs and video that were I guess it would have been filmed back in the seventies that were obtained of the aerial phenomena in question.
And again the Brazilian National Archives have made those kinds of documents of Availa to the public. And I had a dear friend who was a great researcher in Brazil who just passed away earlier this year, a Jagyvard, but he had really really led the charge in terms of trying to push for transparency in his country and also to obtain a lot of those documents and make the public more aware of their presence and what they entailed. So to your point, yeah, a lot of countries have
been involved in this. I can't speak with the same level of knowledge about what maybe has happened in China, although I will point out that once the UAP Task Force had been established here in the United States, there had been a lot of Chinese I guess official news outlets, state controlled media there in China that came out saying that the Chinese government's going to use artificial intelligence and we're going to figure out what UAP are before the
Americans do. So it's interesting to see that sort of dynamic we're going to beat them to the punch. But the broader takeaway seem to have been that China indeed is interested in this phenomenon just like the Americans are. And so for those who would say, well, we're just worried about whether Chinese drones are what some of our personnel are encountering when they see these UAP, it seems that China is concerned about what these things might be and that they're trying to get to the bottom of
it too. So I mean, for what that's worth, again, it does seem to point to the worldliness of this phenomenon.
Yeah, it can't just be an American thing. And of course we also had a James Fox on the program a couple of times now, and he's done a tremendous amount of research down in Brazil, so it's kind of funny that you brought that particular country up. He's had various degrees of success. I guess with working with the governmental agencies and whatnot down there, and he was a fascinating guest and a really cool guy in generally, Yeah, a great guy too, very well researched, very very well researched.
At this point, what's your best guess what the hell's going on?
I'm still saying it's sasquatch as far as you know, what I think is going on again. You know, sasquatch, for instance, is a simple problem. And by that I mean, and Cliff, I've heard you and Bobo say this many times, you know, I mean, they're probably just I mean, all the evidence points to this just being a biological phenomenon. It's an animal, and somehow it has remained incredibly wary of humans, wary enough that they're pretty hard to reconcile
in terms of, you know, obtaining that physical evidence. And UAP aren't unlike that in the sense that this is similarly evasive phenomenon. Again. A great definition of the paranormal appears in Matt Preuittz's new book The Phenomenal Sasquatch, where he's talking about how phenomena that are reported throughout history and that seem to be fairly a common occurrences, but actually are incredibly rare. That's a good way to look
at both sasquatch and UAP. Lots of people say they've seen these things and encountered them, but they're actually extremely rare phenomena. As far as what I think is going on and what UAP may represent, I mean, it's in anybody's guests. I've always been fond of the possibility that there could be an extraterrestrial phenomenon. But if we want to go down the rabbit hole here for a moment
and say, you know, what are the other possibilities. There have been people who have proposed the idea that we may be seeing, you know, some sort of developments that are occurring behind the scenes here on Earth, and that a lot of these may just be secret technologies of ours that might help account for why when there are observations of the occupants of some of these craft that they often do appear very human like and in some
instances almost indistinguishable from humans. In some instances, people have said that the reason they look so much like humans might be because they are humans. But maybe they aren't humans from our temporal reality. They could be humans from another dimension. They could be humans for another period and time. In other words, it could be us from the future coming back to view successive generations from the past and
observe how we lived in our present day. There's always that idea that we could be dealing with extraterrestrial visitors that just traverse great distances through space to get here. But there's also that fun idea that's kind of what you see in the Matrix films, that maybe we live in a sa and that the operators of the Matrix when they intersect with our reality, they appear to us
as UFOs. And you know, for all we know, if we're going to go that far out on a limb to try and suppose what UAP might be, maybe sasquatches or glitches, and the Matrix too. But if I had to really bet on any of those circumstances, my view would probably be that again, UAP appear to be physical,
tangible craft. We don't know where they're from. But I'm very open to the possibility, especially if more and more evidence seems to point in this direction that extraterrestrials or some extraterrestrial technology at very least, you know, it could be autonomous probes that are being controlled remotely, or they could just be completely autonomously controlled, but it could be
some kind of an exotic technology. Now we'd need to see more evidence before we can lead with that presumption, but I am fond of that idea without getting married to it. And again, that's kind of my corollary for the Sasquatches, the big dumb ape idea. I'm not trying to be mean by calling it a big dumb ape. I'm just saying I mean. I think that if we get so far out in our thinking about either of
these phenomena, we really don't do ourselves any favors. This comes back to what you were talking about, Cliff, you know, put your best data first. I think it's unnecessarily reductionist to say that, oh UAP can very easily be explained. They can't trust me. The United States federal government would not take such interest in this phenomenon as they do if this were easily reconcilable and they didn't think there
was anything worthy of study. Again, we should put our best data forward, and for me, a lot of that data is what we are now seeing coming out of government, and there are a lot of researchers myself included in my team with the debrief to McMillan, m Jbinias, and others you know, who are actively involved in trying to
appeal to government. We're speaking with people who have worked in government past and present, and as journalists we're trying to get to the bottom of what they know and how that could help us frame what we may be dealing with. But again, I keep saying that if we have seen this glass ceiling broken in recent years with the UAP issue, it's gone through this legitimization. We're now
seeing lawmakers taking the subject seriously. We may not be able to see all the same developments happening with sasquatch.
But I do think that a similar approach toward trying to understand that phenomenon could also result in more people taking it seriously, more scientists getting involved, and who knows, it could also be that there are some records that will eventually obtain that indicate that at various times, even to a small degree, that there have been government agencies on the state level or federal that have also taken interest in the Sasquatch issue.
Oh, certainly they have. Certainly, you know, one thing that you keep saying that I love the fact that you keep coming back to it is that you keep mentioning to basically follow the evidence. Wherever the evidence leads, that's where we need to go, and that is what comes down. It comes down to for not only UAPs, but sasquatches
as well. Of course, you're throwing around a big dumb ape and I know that you don't really think that way, because but that's the general idea that if you say these things are an animal, then the people who are less aware of how fantastic and intelligent whatever apes are, they say, oh, Cliff, you just think there are a big dumb mape. So no, no, not at all. I think that they're a really big, really intelligent ape. Actually, you know, and I'm sure, and I've talked to you
about this. I know that that's your case as well. But I want to clarify that for listeners that in a way that's almost a throwaway line because when people ask are they humans or are they apes, which is a ridiculous question, of course, because that's like asking is it a coyote or is it a canine? Right, It's a meaningless question, unfortunately, but generally speaking, people are unaware of our own biological family and are in the way that taxonomy works, and are you know the way that
evolution works, et cetera. They Oh, so, Cliff, you think they're just a big dumb ape. No, no, not at all. They are big. They are apes, but they're not dumb, right, And I want to point that out before people get all their feathers in a big uproar out there.
I appreciate you making that point, and actually I'll clarify further to that. Again. By that, I mean in no way as a pejorative to ascribe low intelligence to sasquatch, which is if indeed the characteristics that are often attributed to the creature by those who have encountered it are accurate representations of hou sasquatch behaves. It's arguably second to humans, the most intelligent creature out there. Okay, and by some measures, it may be more intelligent than we are.
But bo does say they don't have jobs or pay taxes, and that proves they're smarter.
You can't argue that, can you. You know? So I mean in some ways, and you know, I've talked with a lot of friends, you know, naturalists philosophers who say that one of the greatest problems that humans have ever created for themselves are civilization, society, and the intricacies. I mean, it gives us a lot of really good things, right, I mean, easy access to food and shelter and things
like this. But really, anybody who spends any time camping or out in nature and reverting back to the wild so to speak, I mean, I think they will have the experience of realizing what we have lost by becoming so dependent on a structured kind of civilization, the likes of which we have today. I know, I love that.
And whether or not I find sasquatch when I'm out there in the forest, you know, with Matt Pruter or whoever, and we're out there stopping around in the foothills of Georgia, I mean, to me, getting back to nature in itself is something I just love. And in that regard, I mean, I look at a creature like sasquatch that has evolved to resemble and in many ways even behave like humans.
We've got a bipedal lape. It's very large, it's very clever, very cunning, very capable of you know, finding food and obviously sheltering itself against the elements, and yet it hasn't become encumbered by a lot of the things that society imposes on humans today. I mean, maybe that's sort of a romantic outlook, but I think there's actually some truth to that too. So in some ways, you might say
Sasquatch is actually more intelligent than we are. It's avoided a lot of the perils that humans now face by remaining hidden out there in the forest and living simply and enjoying nature.
Getting back to the UAP thing real fast, I'm Melissa, and I my wife said, we're astonished because Melisa's kind of a u FO girl, right, she likes this this sort of thing UFOs and ghosts and stuff, so I'm exposed a lot of this stuff through her. We're astonished that more people aren't interested, you know. I mean, they'd rather watch a reality TV show about you know, a family or the Kardashians or something. But no, no, no, there's potentially non human intelligences out there looking at us
or interacting or doing stuff. Why do you think it is that more people aren't taking this seriously or perhaps don't understand the gravity of this situation. I mean, this could legitimately be potentially the most important discovery in all human history, and it's on our doorstep, but people you know, are watching like cupcake shows.
It's a really good point. I think about this a lot. I saw a guy on Twitter in recent days tweeting about, you know, is there a way that we can learn to talk to our family members about UAP? And again, I think that the same really that we're about to dive into here applies to sasquatch or any other kind
of topic like this. But he had been sharing a communicational messenger or some app and saying, so, here is a link to a article that's giving a breakdown of all the latest stuff with the whistleblower and everything, and the family member had replied with like an eyebrows raised emoji and then immediately pivoted to, so, what do you want me to pick up for dinner tonight? I mean, And I got to tell you, I mean, I've had
that same thing. I lovingly say that, you know, I called my mom and dad just to check in right after we had dropped the big article there at the debrief, and I said, you know, Mom, Dad, and let me just be clear. I mean, I am interested in all this stuff because at a young age I was gifted with parents who instilled wonder in my imagination, and they gave me books on Sasquatch. I mean, when I was in kindergarten, in first grade, I was reading Ivan Sanderson.
I had a UFO book by Ray Fowler. These were not books for children, but I asked for him, and my parents say, you know, if it'll make him read, we'll give him what he's asking for. And I'm so glad that they did.
So.
They're interested in this stuff too. Him. My dad is just about as interested as I am in Sasquatch. But I call them to tell them the news about the whistleblower stuff and everything, and my mom in the background, I hear her yell and say I believe it, and my dad says, that's fascinating, son. Now listen, I got to go to the dealership tomorrow. Could you give me a ride.
A lot of.
People I talk to have had that kind of experience, but I think in the case with my parents, it's
certainly not because they're not interested. But I think that the reality for them is they're like, you know, of course this stuff's probably out there, it's probably real, and I would imagine that a lot of people are already they've kind of warmed up to that idea, and so we always share this idea you can't handle the truth and one concern and they're actually there's some historical precedent for this and the reality that certain agencies have been
concerned about. You know, what would happen if humankind were made aware without any kind of you know, question any further. I mean, if we were to disclose the reality of an extraterrestrial presence on Earth, I mean, society might fail, Religions would go away, people would be you know, out there in the streets. I mean, it would be complete and total chaos. I wonder sometimes would it necessarily? I mean,
I look at people's reaction to this recent news. People are excited, but a lot of them are like, man, doesn't surprise me at all. And that's kind of where I am. Cliff. I look at this and I say, if you told me that all this stuff that we've been hearing, these whispers about these rumors about crash wreckages and things maybe at Roswell or wherever else, going back decades cover up secret programs that have been studying this technology,
trying to reverse engineer it. I mean, if you told me all of a sudden that all of it was true, I can't say I'd really be surprised. We've been hearing these rumors for a long time. But again, we still got a long ways to go before we find that if it is indeed true. So I don't know. Maybe there will be complete societal collapse once the news all breaks, But something tells me that, based on people's kind of ho home reactions, maybe we shouldn't worry about that too much.
I think a lot of people are kind of already accepting the idea.
Yeah, I don't think much would change. It's like the sasquatches are proven to be real today. It would be a big hullabaloo for about a month, and then everybody go back to normal because it turns out they're already real. Right, nothing really changed except for people are aware of it.
But I would I would hope that, I mean again that this is I'm a curmudgety old guy or whatever, but at the same time, I am an optimist in a lot of ways, and I would hope that knowing that perhaps we weren't alone, whether I'm talking about sasquatches on the planet or something else, you know, driving cool
spaceships or our atmosphere and checking us out. Maybe that would give us a little bit of introspection, some sort of humility, I guess, and realize that perhaps building our arsenals to kill our brothers isn't the best use of our money when we have so many people in need
in the world, you know. And that's one one glimmer of hope that I see with a lot of this UAP legislation and whatnot, is that it is finally giving those people who say that they're quote unquote leaders but don't act like it, and governments something to agree upon, because for the most part they're like preschoolers arguing over a toy and like yelling and pointing fingers and blaming
at each other. But to give them something to actually agree upon for some greater good that has to have some sort of beneficial effects for society, and to see them coming together and some sort of bipartisan legislation to make some things happen for a bigger than human cause, literally bigger than human cause, is at least some good that's coming out of the government today. Instead of the tit for tat name calling and what about ism that we get fed every day through the media.
Yeah, that's one of the most fascinating things I've seen. I mean, it's hard to say that anything that's just happening on Capitol Hill is anywhere remotely close to as fascinating as some of the UAP potentials. And again saying goes for sasquatch to me, there's a reason why I'm
studying these phenomena. And I'm not a politician, but it's been fascinating seeing that members of the different parties that often share no common ground or very little at least, they all seem to be an agreement that, hey, whatever UAP represent, this is something we all need to take seriously. I've seen very few instances where there have been holdouts for political reasons that have said we can't pass this legislation.
Now that's not to say that there haven't been some They are always going to be skeptics certain personality types and things like that. But I mean, in large part, those who have worked to push forward this UAP legislation and who have gotten it included in the National Defense Authorization Act over the last several fiscal years. I mean, it's been a bipartisan group with lawmakers from both sides of the political isle, and they're all coming together in
unity on this point. So I mean that to me, at least on the socio cultural level, has been one of the most fascinating things.
Yeah, and a glimmer of hope, I think as well, because I think I'm a lot like a lot of Americans that is, with very little hope in the government at this point because of the way they behave like children essentially, So to give them something to agree upon and move forward with, to me, that's a breath of fresh air that people are paying attention to something and realize that the importance is greater than what they normally, you know, bicker and bitch at each other about.
So yeah, for sure, and that's you know again, I used to follow politics. I used to be a political junkie. I got to be honest. I mean, I read the news every morning, but I'm not really the political junkie anymore. I mean I began to realize the deeper I looked into trying to understand these phenomena. I mean, really, I guess you could call me a fourteen. In that tradition of Charles Fort. I'm somebody who's interested in every kind of anomaloust phenomena that can be observed in nature, and
I study a little of all of it. I am just a you know, a longtime reader of not only that kind of you know, classic literature, but more recentis by guys like William R. Corlis, the American physicist who documented all kinds of stuff. He even devoted some time to the relictomenoid question and biological anomalies too. But for me, I've had to step away from so much of that. I mean, you turn on the news, and I mean it's just so depressing, so.
So sucking, it's a bum out.
It really isn't to me that sense of wonder that I used to get from watching In Search of as a child. You know, that drive, that hope to find something new, to aspire to find something that not only maybe is fascinating, but in many ways, like you're saying, but you know, might benefit humankind, make us all the
better for it. Maybe it will broaden our perspective even in a cosmic way, and help us understand that our bickering and our fighting here on the global level is you know, a lot less consequential than we may think it is. Yeah, those kinds of pursuits, the pursuit of the mysterious, but not just for the sake of being interested in mysteries. No, actually really trying to study it, really to resolve these anomalies and to understand what's happening
in our world. That's what really gets me, That's what really enlivens my spirit, and that's really where I've just chosen in recent years to put my time, effort, and energy.
Yeah, the unknown and mysteries is a wonderful unifier that brings people together from all sorts of walks of life, and it sees no boundaries, and I think that's just fantastic. And you know, you mentioned you're a general Fortian, so I think that I think that On that note, we'll probably end this episode and go over to the member section and let's get into some of the other things
over there on our special members only broadcast. Let's get into some of the other things that you might think are real, or maybe some of the things that you don't think are real, and we can talk about that. We can cover things I don't know, like dog men or fish fallen from the sky or lizard men or lake monsters and some of that stuff in there, and we'll hear your thoughts on some of those more extraordinary beyond Bigfoot and Beyond sort of things and in the member section.
Okay, sure sounds great.
All right, so members, talk to you on Thursday, I guess and everybody else. Thank you so much for listen need a Bigfoot and Beyond today. Bubba was not able to make us. He was not able to join us before this broadcast ended, but that's all right. We're all here to cover for each other. We're all good friends. That's what we do here at Bigfoot and Beyond. So thank you very much for listening. Everybody. I'll talk to you next week and in the meantime, keep it squatchy.
Thanks for listening to this week's episode of Bigfoot and Beyond. If you liked what you heard, please rate and review us on iTunes, subscribe to Bigfoot and Beyond wherever you get your podcasts, and follow us on Facebook and Instagram at Bigfoot and Beyond podcast. You can find us on Twitter at Bigfoot and Beyond. That's an N in the middle, and tweet us your thoughts and questions with the hashtag Bigfoot and Beyond
H