It Could Happen Here Weekly 84 - podcast episode cover

It Could Happen Here Weekly 84

May 20, 20233 hr 55 min
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:

Episode description

All of this week's episodes of It Could Happen Here put together in one large file

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

Hey, everybody. Robert Evans here, and I wanted to let you know this is a compilation episode. So every episode of the week that just happened is here in one convenient and with somewhat less ads package for you to listen to in a long stretch if you want. If you've been listening to the episodes every day this week, there's gotta be nothing new here for you. But you can make your own decisions.

Speaker 2

It's another mass shooting. There's no I don't, I don't. I don't have a good way to start this episode. Yeah, but welcome jac it appen here a podcast that is also just about mass shootings now because yeah, great great world we live in with me is Gare and Robert Hello.

Speaker 3

Hello, Yeah, so a Nazi killed a whole bunch of people again.

Speaker 1

Yeah, in case there's been another one, we are we are talking about the specific as shooting in Allen, Texas with the guy who was covered in swastika tattoos that certain people are claiming as a fed. Yeah.

Speaker 3

That happened on Sunday, May seventh. So I think I think MIA has some details about what actually happened to kind of put together, but for the majority that we're actually going to be talking about people's reaction to this, including some of the most influential people on the planet.

And the level of reality denial that is, it has been bad before, it's just extra visible right now, and it's visible to a degree that is that is pretty worrying, and we felt it was it was worth talking about just because of you know, whenever a reality fracture is big enough to be like this this noticeable, that is always always an interesting sign of where we are at as a culture.

Speaker 2

Yeah, I think so before we fully dive into that, there's something that I do want to talk about like briefly with this, which is that so like this is you know, in the sort of mold of like white premises killings, is like, this is very very targeted and non white people. So he shot one white guy who was a security guard, and then he shot like three

Latino people and then four Asian people. And I don't know, I wanted to just sort of like remind people that anti Asian violence is still like a thing because everyone seems to have forgotten about it, and you know, this is like I mean, I think if you exclude the if you exclude the three in California that were like also committed by Asian people, says like the fourth mass shooting in two years that's been at least half the victims of an Asian It fucking sucks, I you know.

I mean, we've talked about antias violence a decent amount on this show. None of the things we've ever talked about have gotten any better. The only sort of actual instrument the results of any of this is that like violence against Asian people get used as a rhetorical cudgel

to justify killing black people, which is fucking abhorrent. And yeah, I just wanted to get this in because the media has collectively forgotten that that was the whole thing, and no one really talks about the shooting in that framing, and I think it's important to do so at least for a little bit.

Speaker 3

I think the other thing to kind of just talk about it at the top here. Latino white supremacists and Latino Nazis are not They are not an uncommon thing. This is actually quite common. Two of the most famous fascists in the world right now, Nick Fuentes and Enrique Tario, are not white.

Speaker 4

No.

Speaker 1

I mean, just like, think about think about where I mean, think about the fact that prior to World War Two, Argentina spent a significant chunk of their defense budget bringing over Nazis to train their military, which is a big part of why so many Nazis escaped there via rat lines. You know, we just did a series of episodes on Alfredo Stressner, the fascist dictator of Paraguay who put up and hid Joseph Mengola along with a bunch of other

Nazis for a while. Mangola had citizenship in both Argentina and in Paraguay. Like, this is it's not uncommon. This is not like a new thing. We're not It's not like some sudden shift in the way that fascism works.

Speaker 3

Even the shooter himself like posted memes about being a Latino white supremacist, Like it is a subculture big enough that it has its own like meme of vortex. So and this shooter was actively engaged in in said like a me medic culture.

Speaker 1

No, And it's also worth noting that a lot of the same things that we talk about when we talk about Nazi mass shooter culture in the United States, the fact that a lot of shootings are kind of incited on eight Chan and four chan and similar boards. This happens in Latin America. Brazil in particular has a website called degola chan that has spawned at least a couple of shootings. In the last year, They've had several more mass shootings that are political in nature, that are kind

of driven by online fascists. Like this is not the only place that this happened. Serbia just had a couple as well. But like, what what what? What this guy's doing is very much just as the christ shooting was very much something that occurred within the broader envelope of a transnational accelerationist fascist movement, you know, the Allen shooting, as far as we can tell what the information we have available, seems to fit very well into that schema.

Speaker 5

Okay, we should talk about the shooter a bit.

Speaker 2

So there's there's a sort of I don't know, there's like a after every mass shooting, there's this sort of like identification cycle thing that happens, where like a bunch of musations us AN organizations still trying to figure out who the shooter was.

Speaker 5

So I think like the day after, very very very like pretty.

Speaker 2

Soon after the shooting, there's the new York Times runs an article that reveals that the shooter has this like has an account on like a kind of weird Russian social media site. And from from that information, uh Eric Toler, who's a bell researcher, a belling cat like, tracks down the site and he finds a bunch of wild stuff. He finds like, I mean, obviously the shooter is like he finds it the shooter is a Nazi. He has like a swastika tattoo. He has also has an SS

tattoo from the shooting. He's wearing like a right wing desk squad patches. Like it's just like a whole thing that the Proud Boys also do. It's like a patch that says like rw.

Speaker 1

D, Yeah, they sell our WDS patches. I mean, I think a lot of it kind of comes out of some of the discourse around Pinochet that goes back a few decades, but at this point it's a much broader thing than that. I've got a bunch of photos of Jeremy Brederimo I think is his now who is one of the Proud Boys. I believe he's the guy who got stabbed prior to January sixth during one of the big riots in DC after the twenty twenty election, but

with the big RWDS patch on his chest. And you can find like Tasitala Tozy, who is an inveterate rioter with a Patriot prayer up in Portland, would wear them all the time. They're a common piece of fascism merch.

Speaker 2

Yeah, and you know, and this and also you know the other thing that's kind of important that gets found on this like social media site, which okay, I wish you it's a kind of weird thing, like he doesn't I don't know the social media site. Seems like he was basically using as like a journal, Like he doesn't like follow people or like have followers, so he's just

sort of posting this stuff. He also finds a bunch of clips of like Timpoole videos, and so this immediately sends the entire right into like you know, full on defense mode, right. You know, it turns out it's it's not great for your brand with like the sort of general array of people if it's being associated with a

guy who just did a mass shooting. So Tim Poole responds to the other thing is there's there's like a manifesto on it, and Tim Poole responds to this by I think I think what actually, like legitimately what happened is he read the manifesto and there's a thing in the manifesto like talking about the Nashville shooter being trans or like specifically about the Nashville shooter. And I think I think specifically he read that and was like, oh shit, this is my out. I can go back and talking

about the Nashville shooter. Sure, And so he starts, he starts this. There's this whole sort of train of like right wing stuff about how all of this is fake. So he starts arguing that, like this isn't the guy's social media account. This this sort of very very rapidly morphs into i mean, just like full on like Sandy

hook shit, what if his employees like tweets? Why is the corporate press so threatened by people questioning the authenticity of a Mexican neo nazi's Russian social media account uncovered by state funded media? And this because this immediately becomes the mainline right state funded media things. They're talking about Belling Cat, which.

Speaker 3

They're they're hopping on all of the Tanky conspiracies.

Speaker 6

Yeah, yeah, running with it.

Speaker 3

Because Twitter is a is a cultic milieu of conspiracy, and you can latch onto one talking point to make you feel okay about denying an entire like facet of reality and then it becomes an easy out.

Speaker 2

Yeah, and we're gonna we're gonna circle back to like specifically the tanking people getting involved in this because they do.

Speaker 1

What they're doing is a little bit of like and

uh an evolution from what what's what? Folks kind of in the debating Christians about evolution and shit called the Gish gallop, where the the the original idea of the Gish gallop was when you're arguing from a creationist perspective about stuff like, you know, the age of the world, you bring up so many different kind of topics, you know, from different very niche issues you have a carbon dating to, you know, specific problems you have with like the way

scientists are interpreting specific fossils, and it's just too much detail for somebody in like an ad hoc public argument to really like counter at once. And kind of the evolution of it is when you're dealing with something like this rather than deal with the broader picture, which is there's just a tremendous amount of evidence that this guy was a Nazi, that this guy was motivated and kind of brought into the community by a lot of content

that guys like Tim Poole make. Instead you focus on, you pull up one single thing that you can kind of like try to get people to latch onto, and if you can get them arguing about that thing, you can get them to ignore the bigger picture, like at least you can distract attention from it.

Speaker 7

And it works.

Speaker 1

It works for a lot of people. It's especially effective on social media.

Speaker 2

Yeah, and unfortunately the social media platform that this is mainly happening on his Twitter, which Elon Musk owns, and Elon Musk immediately like decides that he's just fully in on this shit, and he is, I mean she is, like, like Elon Musk is is just actively promoting the sort of weird conspiracy that basically what the sort of right wing story about this becomes is that like, okay, Belling Cat is is the CIA, and they're being paid to create a like a false flag thing that okay, they're

they're they're being paid to create a false flag to to make this guy look like a Nazi and a timpoole fan to distract people from the Nashville shooting, which is just like.

Speaker 5

The absolute nonsense.

Speaker 2

But you know, you you immediately get into like that that Tim Pool employee again, like it like starts doing this whole like we are enshrined with liberty to freely scrutinize every claim, just as the sanctity of like every human being in America like has the right to question stuff. It's like this is like literally like literally word for word stuff Alex Jones was saying in the Sandy Hook trial.

But we've gotten to the point where you just you know, like the sort of mainstream of the right just does this about every time it's a writing mass shooting, and this this particular time, it's been just everywhere.

Speaker 1

Yeah, we're we're, we're gonna there's no no, no smooth way to break to ads in an episode about a mass shooting, but that's what we're doing.

Speaker 7

We are back.

Speaker 3

I want to talk now a little bit more about the actual exchanges that Musk was involved in and how this narrative of like a syop and this whole narrative around the shooting being a syeop, how that viewpoint got inflated on Twitter because must controls where all of the interactions go for tweets and actually like specifically get into how this specific conspiracy is is a demonstration of how much of just a separation from reality that people like

Musk are like actively actively working towards. One of the main accounts that Musk was kind of like riffing off of in this and who was like trying to like feed Musk this type of stuff was the redheaded libertarian who works for Timpoole. She created a bunch of memes about this shooting talking about how how this the guy can't can't be a Nazi and he because he's Latino. You know, why would someone use a Russian social media site?

Even tho it's actually very common for American notaptries to use Russian social media.

Speaker 1

We used to do an exercise at a trainings that I did for Bellancat where people would go through and use v Contacta, which is a Russian like kind of Facebook clone, and you would kind of use geographical search to find of like KKK members and shit in the American South, because it was really common with them because it didn't have any kind of content moderation.

Speaker 3

So yeah, so the types of like right wing content creators who are within Musk's Twitter orbit start pumping out all of this stuff, right, and this is where Musk

gets all of his information from. So he starts he starts like just questioning the validity of this story, but then also specifically targeting belling Cat, saying that didn't didn't didn't this story come from Bellingat, which literally specializes in psychological operations, which, first of all, is just a wild thing to say when you're talking about is specifically like an open source journalism website, Like it's the most the most honest way you could do journalism because it's given

people the tools to literally check all of the work themselves.

Speaker 5

Like it's yeah, I mean this is.

Speaker 2

Kind of like a minor aside, but one of the things that happens here constantly with all these people is they're like absolutely astounded, like like how how how did belling get possibly find this? It's like, well, it's not

that hard, it's really easy. The thing is the thing is right if if so, Like, I am not a journalist, right, I learned everything I know about this from gare in like one night, and like I have tracked down like mass you too social media accounts and like before the police got them, Like it's not that hard.

Speaker 6

But the thing is it requires you to even like just.

Speaker 5

A tiny tiny bit be a journalist.

Speaker 2

And not a single one of these writing people has ever like done journalism ever, and so like just like the tiniest bit of journalism just like destroys their brains and they're like they are physically incapable of comprehending how someone could have done a journalism and then they use this to sort of feed their base because their base also just doesn't understand how someone could do a journalism and this this, this, this lets you do this like

cycle of like how could they possibly have found this? They must have been given it by the government.

Speaker 3

It's just like No, all that really comes down to is is who has who is on their computer at the right time when this thing happens. Yeah, whenever I find out or whenever I can id people, it's always just like coincidence that the thing happens as I'm already at my computer, so now I can look into this thing, right, it is It is just who has access to the internet at the right time is the way that we figure out like, who's gonna end up iding somebody?

Speaker 1

Yeah, it's it's a mix of that, and it's a mix of just who has the patience and the motivation to sit and comb through shit for hours and days, which is the same thing that like, it's the same thing at anti fascist activists have been doing for years, you know, especially since Charlottesville, where you're just like, I'm going to watch the same videos of the same event and find new ones and I'm going to spend three years doing that, and eventually I will catch a tattoo

or a shirt with a logo and that will let me id somebody, because you know, of the of the different social media shit that I've been pulling up, like it's it's it's not it doesn't take like spice satellites. It just takes motivation, being in the right place at the right time and having nothing else to do.

Speaker 7

Yeah.

Speaker 3

So eventually they started just kind of harping on this term syop, so sich obviously means psychological operation. But what what they mean when they say syop is that they mean this was like a government, This is a false

like a manufactured government planned operation. That's what they actually mean, right, Like in in the conspiracy space, syop is is more like a loaded term they don't actually refer to like actual syops that get doning like against like you know, you can look at like co Intel pro right, you can look at you can look at various ways that the FBI of the army has done syops. But what they mean when they say syop is this is like this is a government conspiracy theory and it's a false

narrative that's been crafted to like change public opinions. So I guess, I guess these people mea you mentioned how they're making it sound like this was this was created to distract from the Nashville shooting or just just they have various like motivations for why they want to but it the important part is that they could use this word to just easily deny reality, and that is that it is kind of beyond like whatever motivations they have.

It's just easy for them and their ideology to just block off this section of reality so that they don't have to Like people who are like actually libertarians don't need to like confront what the extent of their ideology actually means. Right, you know, there's certainly people who are like okay with mass shootings happening, or you know, are totally fine with with with with like non white people getting killed in mass shootings. But there probably are certain

libertarians who don't actually like mass shootings. They don't actually like when fascists go kill tons of people, and it's easier for them sometimes just to block off this section and ignore it than actually confront what their ideology means. So some must kept saying this is either the weirdest story ever or a very bad syop. The answer is neither. This story is not super weird. It's actually very very explainable if you understand the mechanisms at play here, and even just not a bad SI Yeah.

Speaker 1

I mean it's not even like it's not on it's like on the whole. It's not a particularly complicated story like there are. It is not an uncommon thing. I mean, the biggest, most recent one before this was that that shooting in New York at the grocery store that was like a directly inspired Nazi attack. Like this kind of shit happens constantly in the United States. It doesn't require nobody has to be secretly armed by the Feds. There's

an AR fifteen behind every bush in this country. It's not hard for this kind of this kind of shit, It's not hard to see where this like originates from.

Speaker 3

Yeah, so it's I mean, Muska just kept kept replying to both Timpoole employee tweets tweets from the very blatantly fascist account to end Wokeness, which Musk has been replying to quite a quite often recently. So this and I think the reason why we wanted to just talk about this specifically is just because of you. Like, all of these Musk tweets are getting like millions and millions of views, if the view counter is any is anything to go by. At the very least, he's in the top three accounts

with the highest engagement on Twitter. So these these types of conspiracy theories are getting inflated to extremely high degrees at least online, and the separation of reality online is inflated for these mass shootings in a way that I have not seen in quite a while. I have not seen this much just denial of like information regarding mass

shootings in quite a long time. And the combination of the stuff like the stuff with Belling Cat coming from the tankies and how those conspiracies have now mashed with all of these like neo fascist shit. It's a combination of reality denial that is absolutely worrying for like future mass shootings as well.

Speaker 1

It's a pivot in the kind of reality that's being denied. You know, not we have nothing to do with these Nazis who are parroting some of the things that we say about immigration. It's this is fundamentally not the attack that you think it is. This is our enemies creating an attack to try to make us look bad. Like the fact that that you've always seen and pieces of that.

The fact that it's being parroted by the wealthiest man on the planet using one of the biggest information fire hoses that exists is completely novel.

Speaker 3

Yeah, because I mean a lot of these same conspiracy theories that specifically about like Eric Toler, we saw we saw leftists and tankies bringing up the same stuff during the UH, during the stuff with the Nazi National guardsmen a month ago. So we have a lot of this stuff has kind of been writing on the back of

that and just continued and accelerating UH since then. It appears there's a few outlets like Business Insider and Blank at themselves reporting that they are they are receiving basically shadow bands on Twitter right now, with their with their with their account and their posts having a very limited reach.

Speaker 1

An interesting shadow band too, because it's not like it. It appears, at least from what I've seen, that what they're doing is they're making it so that when people type belling Cat into the search bar, nothing comes up, as opposed to like throttling the reach of the actual posts themselves, trying to make it deliberately difficult for people to actually look up information, which is interesting to me.

Speaker 3

Yeah, and I guess I guess it's worth saying that the police and Texas have confirmed everything about about the shooters political beliefs and his new Nazi ties, and he has a neo Nazi shit in his apartment. Obviously his body is covered with neuo Nazi tattoos. One of the things that some of the kind of right wing content creators were trying to do is that they were trying to say that the specific pictures of the individual that belling Cat found online, that that these pictures were not

this person. They in fact that they were saying, they were saying that the shooter is just somebody else, which was also proven rob but yeah, they also.

Speaker 2

They also they did another classic right wing thing, which is that they misidentified the shooter. Yes, I thought it was another guy with the same name, because.

Speaker 1

Like and they misidentify the shooter, and they misidentified the non Nazi tattoo that he had, yes, because he had he had weirdly enough, like the city of Dallas's seal tattooed on his hands.

Speaker 3

Yeah, the Texas tattoo on his shoulder.

Speaker 1

Yeah. They they like definitely, like there were a lot of conspiracy theories about that, and a lot of them related to the fact that, like the first photos we got of the guy were like the kind of photos you get of a dead man at a mass shooting that someone takes through a window while sheltering, So it

wasn't clear. So they would take a picture of like a social media picture of the tattoo on his hand, and then a picture of him dead, and like the tattoo on his hand in the picture of him dead was like blurrier, and they were like, look, the lines aren't straight. They're straight in the picture on his social media and it's like, well, yeah, because those were taken by very different cameras in very different situations. Like you know how cameras work, you know how this this is of what.

Speaker 3

Of the funnier ones that one of these content creators was doing was they were they were posting the the photos of of the Nazi tattoos that the shooter himself posted online, being like, look how fresh these tattoos are.

Speaker 6

How can.

Speaker 3

If he had these tattoos for years, why do they look so fresh at these photos?

Speaker 6

Because the photos were from right after.

Speaker 1

Him, like you do when you get a tattoo. Yeah, there's like I have tattoos pictures of me getting tattoos from like fifteen years ago somewhere on my Facebook. Like you could do the same thing, suspicious Robert.

Speaker 3

One of the interesting things is that like we see the same thing with all of like all of the worries around like deep faking stuff, like all of all of the like weaponized on reality stuff. It doesn't need to actually be convincing. It it doesn't need to be good like like deep fakes don't need to be good quality. You can you can post a meme of like a picture of Biden's face and some text on it with a quotation mark post on Facebook and millions of people

will believe that's just true. Like it doesn't need to be real or convincing in order for it to have it like an effect.

Speaker 1

And it's also it's not just about I think it's it's thinking, Like, it's not just about convincing people. It's not about making them believe it. This is like, this is the thing that I tried to talk about years ago during the Eight Chance shooting. It's shit posting. Part of the goal is just to disrupt conversation. It's to

make people engage with the fake stuff. It's to make people break kind of the lines of reasoning that they are going in with, Like it's to make people distract people from the stuff that is really clear and obvious

and just kind of fracture the conversation. Because the more that you do that kind of the weaker you make the response to what's happened, and the more kind of that you can distract people from the degree of complicity that the people in kind of the media sphere on the right have for all of this shit.

Speaker 2

Yeah, And I think that's why it's like specifically going after the Billin Cat stuff has been really effective with UP because like like there are like people who I am friends with in real life who like are convinced that billing cares as a CIA si op, Like this is like a like they like really not insignificant portions

of the left believe this, yep. And that means that it's you know, unbelievably difficult to form any kind of coherent response when like half of the people who would normally be doing this stuff are like, oh, well they are actually CIA, So.

Speaker 3

Like, yes, the the Netherlands based CIA unit.

Speaker 1

Yeah, it's like yeah there. I mean like at least in the time I was there, the primary people funding us was the Dutch post code lottery, Like it's it's it's I don't know, like.

Speaker 3

Like almost every news organization they take grants where yeah, where they can get them.

Speaker 2

Yeah, And like I want to specifically talk about the NYDA a tiny bit because people like, so the main conspiracy is about like they like at one point they took they took a grant for the National Talent for Democracy and like, yeah, those people do weird shit sometimes, but they also for example, like if okay, so if you're gonna have the line that every single person who's taking money for the n D is a CIA thing,

Like you have to accept that. For example, like the pro Beijing Electoral Party in Hong Kong is a CIA op because they also got a shit ton of any D money, right, Like, like any just gives money to a shit ton of people.

Speaker 3

It's definitely worth emphasizing that, like the initial groups that are pushing the Bellingkt conspiracies were all gray zone people that are specifically specifically paid by the Russian government, like because Russia was mad at Bellinkat for exposing their war crimes. Yeah, and like that's where all of this stuff starts.

Speaker 1

There's I don't know how much point there is in like laying into this specific thing too much. Would I would remind you at all times when you are like dealing with breaking news like this and there's a bunch of different and there's a bunch of different kind of like conflicting arguments about what's actually happening. Okham's raiser isn't one hundred percent of the time the way to go. But in a situation like this, you have two possibilities.

One is that a Nazi went on a killing spree, as happens constantly, as has been happening since the Nazis became a thing. The other possibility is that the federal government, for unclear reasons, convinced a man to cover his body in swastika tattoos and shoot random people at a mall for gun control. That's not going to get passed in the state of Texas. I don't know, like which of those seems likely to you.

Speaker 2

I did this thing like very deliberately to myself, like about a year ago, where I was like, I was very deliberate, like I'm going to like un conspiracy theory my brain, because you know, like there is a lot of like like the kind of reasoning you get in this stuff, which is like, hey, here's a thing that like, quote unquote looks weird, so this whole thing must be suspect, so it must be an op is like a really really kind of like it's a really common kind of

reasoning now that just like a lot of people across the entire poetic conpectionum have and it's not actually a good way to understand the worlds like it's it simply is not.

Speaker 3

We live in an increasingly absurd world where every single weird thing is more and more visible because of the Internet, so we're more aware of how much weird shit happens all the time, and stuff that and stuff that may not not necessarily be weird, because like everything, there is an expert in every field who can explain to you why this thing actually makes perfect sense. And it's just people being exposed to things that they're not usually that

they're not used to. I think one of the interesting one of the last things I think we should like mention about this is just the influx of how militant like neo Nazism or like visible ne Nazism has just been People have just been saying it's Feds in an increasingly concerning way, like like I think, like a last month, there was this viral video of a whole bunch of Nazis stressed in red and black, I think, protesting something. I forget the exact circumstances at the moment.

Speaker 6

I think it was.

Speaker 3

I think it was some drag related protests, but yeah, there was this group of Nazis dressed in red and black doing Nazi shit, And when you looked at any of the videos on Twitter, you saw hundreds of replies from people with blue check marks just calling them Feds, saying oh, Wow, look at all these Feds. Well, oh, I can't believe the FEDS are so busy today. Blah

blah blah blah blah. You know, it's it's like the one hundred person NPC meme with them all wearing the blue check mark on the forehead saying it's the FEDS just because it's it's once we get to the point where we have more Nazis doing mass shootings again, the same way like there was an influx between like twenty seventeen to twenty nineteen than twenty twenty, there was kind of a dip because all all crime kind of had

a dip. As we're gonna go into the next next election cycle, as things are gonna start looping again, when more and more Nazis start doing shit, just how there's gonna be a bigger swath of the population who just denies that's what's happening, and that is gonna make make the problem of Nazis probably a bit harder to deal with.

I mean, there's there will still be anti fascists doing their work to like docs and I D people and and and and all that stuff, but the amount of like visibility and the amount of traction that that this level of reality denial is getting around, like militant in neo Nazism and around Nazi killings, will be a kind of a new thing to navigate, or not a new thing, but like it's a the problem will be bigger than what it used to be.

Speaker 1

I wanted to kind of note one thing on a on the other side of the ideological spectrum and uh and and not to equate the two. But there has been something kind of concerning that I've been seeing crop up in liberal circles. You may have noticed, kind of as a response to all of the mass shootings and the generally consistent Republican line that there's nothing to do

except for be shittier to marginalize people. That that there's been kind of this like focus in a lot of mainstream liberal media on articles and the idea that you should spread pictures of victims of shootings, and a focus on the amount of damage that like a weapon like

an AR fifteen does to a human body. People can have their own opinion on like whether or not this is a helpful idea, but I have noticed in sort of arguments I've been having with people a troubling trend, which is when I talk about the importance of doing stuff like taking stop the bleed training, carrying things like tourniquets. I've gotten responses from a couple of people that are like AR fifteens are so powerful the wounds are not survivable,

there's no point in doing this. That is not the case. I have known dozens of people who have been shot by AR fifteens, in some cases in AR style weapons, in some cases multiple times, and larger weapons, and lived. It is always worthwhile to have stopped the bleed training

and to carry equipment. If you hear anyone saying that, please please correct them, Because whatever you think about gun control, it is very important for people to know how to deal with those kind of injuries, and it is important

in the immediate wake of an attack. One of the things that was really unsettling is in the immediate way of the Allen attack, after the shooter was down, there was a couple of people who ran in to try to provide life saving aid, and a bunch more who took photos of the people who had been wounded and killed. And it's possible that if more of the people taking photos had gotten in an attempted to provide aid. Some of the people who were injured might have survived, no

way to know, but always worth having that training. That's just something I've noticed. Not to put it in the same moral universe as trying to pretend your calls for violence aren't calls for violence, but it is something that concerned me and that people should maybe keep an eye on.

Speaker 3

Yeah, I mean, I that was the case with the Rittenhouse shootings. There was someone who basically had most of their arm, yeah, blown off, but they did not die. Yeah, So yeah, that is that is not true. And I've watched a lot of the Rittenhouse footage and yeah, it is.

Speaker 7

It is.

Speaker 3

It is nasty. Yeah, but no, that is that is a good thing to note.

Speaker 5

Yeah, and also like.

Speaker 2

On just a fundamental human level, like do do not let yourself be consumed by the algorithm so much that your first reaction to seeing someone get shot is you try to film them, Like, yeah, we need to be better than this, Like we have watched people die because of this, Like like this, this is not a thing as society that we can continue to be doing. Like we simply cannot. We simply have to act and not like become part of a sort of like mass media spectacle instead of doing something.

Speaker 3

Yeah, the footage of things is not going to change it, especially with mass shootings. Footage and mass shootings usually actually make the problem worse, and it's mostly used by people who want to be mass shooters.

Speaker 1

Yeah, I'm I that may be a conversation we should, uh, we should expand on it a later date. But you know, don't don't let the bastards grind you down. Take a stop the bleed course, you know, bring a tourniquet with you out in the world. These are these are action items that that that you can do that might in fact help. So that's going to be it for us today. It could happen here until next time, you know, keep your head on this wivel.

Speaker 8

Hello and welcome to another episode of It Could Happen Here with me Andrew of the YouTube channel Andrewism. Today, I'm joined by Mia and today we're going to be discussing another leading figure in the black radical tradition. If you've heard the episodes on Quasi Ba Lagoon, you know exactly what's up today. I've got the first part in a two parter about Lorenzo kembo Iven and his vision for revolution. Even's life has been one of resistance, resilience,

and radicalism. These contributions the anarchist movement, especially his work on black anarchism, even to this day with his ongoing podcast, continues to inspire activists around the world, myself included. So, Mia, what are your what has your experience been with the Rinzo Combo Irvin and his work.

Speaker 2

Yeah, so I've read Anarchist in the Black Revolution, which I really enjoy. I've listened to not all of but like a pretty good amount of the Black Autonomy podcasts that he runs, which is great, and so yeah, I'm excited to talk about him.

Speaker 8

Awesome. Yeah, he really is a fantastic and necessary figure in this you know, broader movement, especially now for those who don't know, the Rnzo Combo Irven was one of the earliest founders of the black anarchist movement, which was a distinct tradition born out of the history of black radical politics in nineteen seventies. Black anarchism is not just h we are thrown on an adjective onto anarchism. There's a history behind it and there's a distinct tradition that

accompanies it. There were anarchists historically who were black, who were not part of this black anarchist tradition, and well, of course black anarchists who weren't part of those earlier movements. I think one of the most notable sort of go to examples is Lucy Parsons was a very important anarchist figure in the sort of the peak of the movement, at least in the US in the twentieth century. But although she was Black, her contributions don't necessarily contribute to

that sort of black anarchist lineage. So let's get into earthIn right. Nineteen forty seven. By the time he was twelve, Lorenzo Kobertuvin had joined the NAACP youth group and participated in sit in protests that helped to end racial segregation in Chattanooga, Tennessee. He was later drafted during the Vietnam War and served in the army for two years, where

he eventually became an anti war activist. And in nineteen twenty seven, when he was twenty years old, after his involvement with the Student Non Violent Coordinating Committee, Lorentzo kumbo Uven joined the Black Panther Party as a rank and file member. Two years later, he hijacked a plane and

fled to Cuba. While he was on the run for attempting to kill a Ku Klux Klan member, But instead of receiving support as some black radicals had received when fleeing to Cuba, Cune authorities had jailed him, deported him, deported him to Czechoslovakia, and eventually he escaped from Czechoslovakia to each before eventually being caught, tortured, and brought back to the United States, and then after being drugged during his trial, he was handled two life sentences by an

all white jury in a redneck town. Tough prick as you can imagine, Irvin had very quickly become disillusioned with the dictatorship he had experienced in Cuba and the socialist countries he visited, and during his time in prison, he reflected on his life and found an alternative method for black revolution, distinct from the form he found the Panther Party. Now even wasn't the first person to criticize the Black

Panther Party's style of organization. One of the splits between the East Coast and West Coast Panthers was on what form of organization they would take. I discussed that a bit in the Quasi Battagoon episodes, and then of course there were other figures who came out to the Black Panther Party with their own criticisms, including if I remember correctly, Asata Shakur and also Don Cox. While in prison, Iuven,

had you gone receiving anarchist literature? And he also signed to pick up what another Black anarchist who he was briefly imprisoned with at the time, Martin Sostra, was putting down. Martin Sostra is what I believe one of the first major black anarchist figures in that sort of nineteen sixties nineteen seventies period, and so him being in prison with Sostra at the same time sort of really helped even to understand exactly what anarchism meant and how it would

applied to a specifically black experience in black context. Ivin was also inspired by Peter Kropotkin, Everyone's favorite Russian and former prince, and ultimately even adopted the ideology of anarchist. His case was soon taken up by the anarchist Black Cross and the Helper Prisoner Oppose Torture Organizing Committee, which led to an international campaign the petition for his release.

Evan's writings on Anarchism of the Black Revolution, which was written in prison, gained immense popularity, and so he was released in nineteen eighty three after serving nearly fifteen years. In his book, he emphasized that anarchism is the most democratic, effective and radical way to obtain freedom for the black community, but the black people must be free to design their

movements without the approval of North American anarchists. Do you believe that black people and other people of color would be the backbone of the American anarchist movement of the future. The first edition of Anarchism the Black Revolution was published quite a while ago. It's still the addition that is available on the Anarchist Library you can check out, but it is I would consider it to be a sort

of a rough early edition. There are certainly some typos and editorial mistakes and stuff that were addressed in the most recent edition that was published and I believe twenty twenty one and edited with some help from William C. Anderson, who also is another leading figure in the modern black anarchist movement, having written works like Nation or nomap Irvin took and still takes a principal stance against capitalism, white supremacy, imperialism,

colonial oppression, patriarchy, queerphobia, and the state, recognizing the government is one of the worst forms of modern oppression. His emphasis on intersectionality has played a crucial role in the shift away from class exclusive analysis in the American anarchist movement, and today he remains active, as I said recording a podcast called Black Autonomy with his wife and fellow forma

panther Jonina. So today we drawn from Even's book Actism of the Black Revolution to delve into his picture of revolution in North America and beyond. I think one of the strongest strategies for the development of the Black Revolution

would be a Black labor federation. As Even discusseds in his book, black labor has been a critical economic fact in America since the country's inception, and it was through the toil of black labor, beginning with slave labor in the Old South and extending to share cropping, farm labor and migration to the North for factory jobs, that the

foundations of the American nation were built. However, as is obvious, black workers have been routinely excluded from that share of the wealth of the American nation and routinely excluded from the trade unions that struggled to regain some of that wealth, like, for example, the American Federation of Labor, the Dash Colored Labor Union, the National Colored Farmers Alliance, and the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, as well as the League of

Black Revolutionary Workers, and other unions and associations of black workers were then formed to represent these interests that were being left out and not at all brought to the table. Black workers were very much instrumental in the Congress of Industrial Organizations, campaign of strikes and sit downs and other protests to organize unskilled industrial workers, but they didn't get

to enjoy the benefits of their pivotal role. Most of the Black population is working class, and black industrial and clerical workers still hold significant potential power and the struggle for black liberation. A lot of these workers have already been organized and to defend their righted work and advocate for their interests, even if union leadership is conservative, even if they weren't challenge management, even if they're not even unionized. We see as well in modern times a lot of

black figures stepping up to organize these unions. The first union to be organized in Amazon was spearheaded by a black worker, Chris Smaws, and workers black workers across history have already been creating union caucuses and creating independently of unions were necessary to push for their specific interests because, I mean, the unity of black workers and the rest of the working class is essential to combat and overthrow capitalism.

But there needs to be a recognition within that unity of distinctly black interests and a distinctly black history, which is why black caucuses within unions are able to take up demand to the struggles that unions have turned the blind eye to, such as discriminatory hiring, firing, and promotion practices,

and you know, lack of equal treatment. I think these caucuses could even go further as even also argues to democratize their unions, to eliminate some of these discriminatory practices, and to really push for the radical fighting spirit that has been lost in some of these sort of reformist

union structures. The black aucuss and also the workers more generally should be stepping up to demand democratic control the union, to demand equal treatments, demand of firmative action, demand full employment demand, shorter work weeks, to demand, the right to strike, the demand to social security, and an employment compensation demand

for liverable minimum wages. Of course, all of these accomplishments or demands already sort of short term benefits that would still retain a COPITALSS structure, but they're necessary nonetheless, especially when unionize the is are an all time low historically.

One of the things that even also advocates for, which I'll get into more in the future, is this idea of unions advocating for companies to put aside funds specifically for programs to rebuild in a city communities and provide work for black workers and your stocks, about worker self management of industry by factory committees and workers councils, and

elections by workers themselves. But the main idea that he's pushing for, at least in terms of the black working class and black labor, is, as I mentioned, a Black labor federation, both in a national level and on an international level, a national workers association with serves both a revolutionary union movement for a place organizing and a mass social movement for community organizing, combining tactics from both the labor and the black liberation movements to multiply their numbers

and build their strength and tilling the unions into these militant class struggle instruments. An example that we can see in history during the late nineteen sixties was the League of Revolutionary Black Workers, which is organizing black auto workers out of the out of the Dodge Revolutionary Movement. Sorry to me, let me rephrase that. One example of that type of organization could be found in the League of Revolutionary Black Workers, which organized black auto workers during the

late nineteen sixties. The League had grown out of a major affiliate of it out of a major affiliate, the Dodge Revolutionary Movement, and it was a black labor federation that existed as an organized alternative to the United Auto Workers, which have been excluding black workers. League was also a very major force on the streets, as it was in addition to organizing its workplaces organized in college campuses and black inner city areas. But its potential was stifled, unfortunately

by political faction fights among leadership. There was a division between those who wanted to take a more Marxist Leninist approach to the organization compared to those who want to take more democratic approach the organization. There was a lack of a solid enough organized based in the factories, there was significant company and United Auto Workers, and state repression.

Of course, organized racism, a lack of cooperation among white workers, and other reasons that eventually led to the league splitting into mutually hostile factions that would die after less than five years of existence. Classic organized and history story. I don't think that you should look at these failures and

use them as an opportunity to give up. I think we look at these failures and we use them as learning opportunities, use them as opportunities to recognize, oh, we can do something like this, but not exactly like this.

Speaker 2

Yeah, and make sure that Bob Avankian is never involved at any point in the process.

Speaker 8

Exactly exactly. I mean, we still need these sorts of labor organizations and associations and unions. We still need black workers pay aheading these sort of organizations to organize other black workers in their communities to support the strike. Sim workplace organized. It will be necessary for significant changes, and of course we need the groups we established to avoid the pitfalls and ideological scruples of Marxism. Len this up.

But you're just the sort of American approach, because in case those of you who don't know, I'm not living in America, I'm not an American, which is why, and also addresses and advocates for an international Black Labor Federation to wield the collective power of black workers globally that have been universally oppressed and exploited around the world as a racial group, Black workers have been oppressed as workers and as people, and this dual form for pressure is really

what emphasizes that need to organize for old rights and our own liberation. In African and Caribbean countries, including trant Tobigo, there are labor federations and labor unions, but a lot of them are reformists, a lot of them are government control, and there's a lack of militancy. There's a lot of collaboration with the government and with companies they're supposed to

be organizing against. As it's necessary to have an organization with an internationalist scope that is pushing for solidarity, that is pushing for radical change. And so I think that's that's the real strength of an international Black Labor Federation. You know, that idea of increased solidarity across several countries, uh the idea of strengthening our collective bargaining power and

ability to organize this better work and conditions. Of course, we'd also have the benefit of shared resources and the benefit of greater visibility to these issues that we are facing in the workplace and in society. And then of course there will also be the ability to exert using

that visibility and resources and solidarity to exert greater political influence. However, you know, an international Black federation, we still struggle with political barriers, particularly in countries that are actively hostile to that sort of organizing. Of course, the power would be will do everything in their power to keep such a struggle from being able to attain and maintain any kind

of momentum or power. The construs rains of time and energy and resources and engagement also prevent such a federation from gaining crown. But I still think of all those are issues that we should keep in mind. If well developed, I think that national, regional and international caucuses can do

a lot to implement significant changes. In fact, one strategy that even advocates for is something that I believe an international Black Labor federation or any kind of International Labor Federation will be necessary to help to organize, and that would be a general strike because the vast majority of the Black community consists of working class people in the US, because many of them are engaged in manufacturing and medical service and communications and food production and retail, h a

lot of blue collar work that really makes the country go around. It really makes them an essential component to the Capital's economy and of the American economy. I think it positions them as really really key players in any sort of protest campaign that would involve first racism and class oppression, and it could go even further into beyond just stepping up and striking for demands in the workplace,

control over the workplace. It could also go step further and accomplish it and accomplish in even more revolutionary goals. And I would of course involve using tactics like industrial sabotage and factory occupations and sit ins and slowdowns and wildcat strikes and other work stoppages that would help to reassuit our collective power. Of course, as I'm always really careful to emphasize when I bring up general strikes, they're

not easy to organize. A friend of mine Alkie. He has a video on his YouTube channel about general strikes and how they work, and some of the history is some past general strikes. So that's I think that's required reading code good reading to definitely check out. But yeah, general strikes are not easy to organize. They're not something that you could just call for on Reddit or Twitter or Facebook or whatever.

Speaker 5

You know.

Speaker 8

It takes serious community and workplace mobilization. It takes significant planning. It takes strike committees and support committees because and even defense committees when employers maybe trying to retaliate against strike cod workers or blacklist or fire workers.

Speaker 4

Yeah.

Speaker 2

And I would also say like something that I think people, okay, there's not a delegate way to say this, Like, look, if you're gonna be engaged in like a long term, serious general strike, you're gonna have to do things like you're gonna have to start seizing stuff, Like you're going to have to start committing theft in order to make sure that people can like eat, Yeah, exactly, Like you're gonna have to start appropriating stuff.

Speaker 8

Yeah, exactly. It's not just standing around in a picket line, you know, Like the general strike is an extra extremely involved and invested. You don't get usually you don't get two chances to do a general strike, you know, like you have that chance, and after that they're usually if you feel you usually introduce legislation or put things in place to ensure that something like that never happens again.

Speaker 2

Yeah, or you get like there was a thing that used to happen back when, you know, back in like the early nineteen hundreds of these, and a lot was you would get these general strikes, but you know they would kind of they would be like like two days long.

And there's this great Melo testa quote from Oheen nineteen twenty four, I think where he's talking about how he's talking about the factory occupations that started in Italy in the like during the two Red Years, and he has this line that goes, general strikes a protests no longer upset anyone, neither those who take part in them, nor those against whom they are directed. If only the police had the intelligence to avoid being provocative, they would pass

off as a public as any public holiday. One must seek something else. We put forward an idea, the takeover of.

Speaker 8

Factories exactly exactly like you have to step beyond or is this legal? It is this legal and looking too Oh what can we make possible? You know, yeah, I mean I don't mean to be flippant, you know, like it's difficult. It takes so much organization of a lot and coordination of a large group of people. There's always put the sea of scabs.

Speaker 5

You know.

Speaker 8

It could have significant consequences for workers who depend on their wages to survive and to support their families. It can have a lot of ripple effects, and it could also involve you know, workers end up going to jail

or just losing their jobs. But still it's it's a powerful tool that if we can recognize, if we could start working towards if when people were calling for strikes back in twenty sixteen and twenty seventeen and twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen and twenty twenty one and two, if all those years so we spent calling for general strikes actually more effort was being put in to actually put the foundation in place for general strike to occur, then twenty

twenty three we would be prepared to support a general strike in a long term way, in a way that would actually signify, you know, revolutionary change in our lifetimes I mean they'll be discertened. Dear listener, They're still potential for such a thing to occur. It just takes preparation and organization. Speaking of things that take preparation organization, and

one of Irven's tactics is a mass tax boycott. You know, people should refuse to pay any form of taxes to the government, be it federal, income, estate, or state taxes while they continue to be exploited. Because, as he would argue, you know, wealthy and their corporations paying next to no taxes, while the poor and workers be a brunch of taxation

and do not receive any benefits in return. You know, all these taxes on income and goods and services, but communities are still suffering, and that money ends up going to fund the Pentagon and defense contractors and consultants who get to you know, loot the government for their own game.

So part of a black radical movement or the Black revolutions, if an arguseful, is a mass tax resistance movement to boycott taxes, similar to the peace movements, war tax resistance, taking people all the taxes that would have gone into personal property, all the taxes that wo have been reaped from personal property and income tax and stocks and bonds, and funneling that towards community development, find that towards going

to projects and organizations. As with any evolution reaction, significant legal consequences would be involved in that. Of course, you know, I think such a tactic needs some serious mass support and backend behind it to succeed. And even then, I don't believe it should be the backboone of any movement. I think it's more so like an accessory and event of media rupture, a single tool in a broader arsenal, Like I don't think the entire movement should be built

off of tax avoidance. They're just going to get a bunch of people throw into prison. They ask a lot more to it than that. I look at the sort of cost benefit analysis, like, yeah, it'll get a lot of federal attention, but if it's not properly implemented, I don't really see any immediate benefits for the long term

goals of the movement. I mean, I could be wrong, but it's not a tactic that I would personally feelful unless such a struggle is already in existence and in its later stages another type of boycott that's even references is, of course the irregular, conventional, unconventional sort of boycotts used during the Civil Rights movement. A lot of black consumers with boycott, particular moochents public services refusing to treat with moochents who would allow for reach of discrimination and use

that loss of revenue to force them to make concessions. Today, black consumers in the US spend hundreds of billions a year in the campus economy. Of course, not all of those consumers are workers, and all those workers are able to boycott. But I think boycotts are still a potential to the arsenal again to wage you know, warfare, economic warfare against the corporate structures. I mean it could be expanded from anything. It can be expanded to cover everything

from specific products to entire industries. Right. Dr Martin Luther King Junior himself recognized the potential of a national black boycott. Doctor Martin Luther King Junior himself recognized the potential of a national black boycott for America's major corporations. Shortly after he was assassinated, he established such an initiative called Operation bread Basket, which aimed, among other things, to force corporations to pour money into national black community development projects for

poor communities. I think, you know, podcasts have a way to put economic pressure, but they I also believe a little bit less effective in our modern globalized world due to the fact that you know, a lot of these companies are owned by the same like three corporations. They usually have ways to mitigate economic losses in one market

by targeting other alternative markets. Or even if they experienced a dip in demand in one sector, they may still enjoy demand in another sector and another part of the world. And on top of that, company is can of also use that it as an opportunity to sort of get people off the movement. For example, boycott is taking place, they could say, oh, you're trying to boycott, well, we just put a sale out fifty sixty percent of wild stocks last and then you have people sort of, you know,

breaking off of the movement. And I mean, of course, not everybody will do that, some people are principled, but that is still a tactic that you see some companies using when they're starting to experience that sort of economic pressure, they try to fragment the movement quote unquote votes in with your wallet, even mass coordinated in my opinion, is limited in its ability to challenge the courses.

Speaker 6

Of oppression in equality.

Speaker 8

I would think it brings us any closer to anarchist I think it only weakens the current world. So I think it's another tactic that really cannot act alone. And then we got another tool in Yos. Now we could call it a rent boycott. We can call it a rent strike. It's a way to achieve certain legislative changes, or so we to achieve certain more radical changes if you get into sort of occupation and squatn and that

kind of thing. In Harlem, in New York City, rent boycotts were so successful the decreation of rent control legislation, which prevented evictions, unjustified price increases, and required reasonable upkeep by property owners and management companies. There is a track record of Rench strikes providing some benefits, you know, allowing tenants to negotiate with landlords and to bring some issues

to light. And I could also bring about, of course, certain policy changes and push for or highlight further the need for affordable and accessible houses. But again, Rench strikes legally risky. They can also be difficult to coordinate, especially for those who are really kind of risk eviction. I mean, nobody can really risk eviction, right, But that's where the

risk sort of comes in. And then if there's a lack of support, if the land world has significant resources behind them, there are also you know, ways that it could go wrong. I don't want to mislead like I want people to be aware of the reality of how difficult this sort of organized effort is. All these organizing

efforts are. It's not a walk in the park. It's not you know, like acts the end of Act three and some revolution story movie where the good guys are able to win with the power of friendship, with that kind of thing. It's tough work and we have to be aware of the risks even as we engage in such actions. Even also advocates for you know, squatting in

tandem with rent strikes. So, in addition to withholding rent payments from exploitsive landlords and banks, also movements to engage in urban squating, to seize housen to seize empty plots of land, to seize unoccupied and abandoned buildings, and to redirect payments that would have gone towards rent towards necessary repairs to improve living conditions and to claim our cities

for ourselves. But again, while squating does provided immediate housing solution for those in need, while draws attentions the issue of hosting inequality, while creates a sense of collective ownership, and while it can help to improve all these neglected areas and urban environments, it's also legal cross involved in effection and arrest. A lot of squatting conditions can be fairly unsafe, while unsanitary, particularly if a property is not

up to a particular standard. And then of course squating is also sort of temporary as a solution. It doesn't really address the root courses of housing. It is really a precurious position to keep people in. And it's another case where without mass defense and support we got a mass movement backing it up, it's going to be very easy to dislodge any games that might be made in

the short term. Family even also argues for the establishment of the commune as a staging ground for Black revolutionary struggle.

The concept of the community is basically like a dual power structure, an institution meant to compete with government power, to preserve as a comment to government power in order to assert collective community power foreman and unify and various organizations as struggle taking control of existing communities and institutions and work at a fight against economic and political and

cultural discrimination, expertiation and servitude in this capitalist society. And he goes in to talk about inner city communes as centers of black counterpower and social revolertionary culture to say, as sort of a living example of what revolution could

look like. I think this is a case where at the time he didn't have the word for it, but we do now, and that would be prefigurative politics, the idea of you know, establishing these sort of institutions and the here and now that would be able to prefigure the world that we want to see in the future. Another component of these sort of communes is to provide a count narrative to sort of black capitalism and responsibility politics. It gets pushed out as a dominant narrative within black

communities in the US. The commune and the Black communey specifically, you can say as a place for a new society and a new culture to emerge that rejects the internalization

of oppression under this system. And so when you want to get into sort of how the sort of community be established, even talks about establishing community councils the world govern and even talks about establishing community councils to allow for collective governance and be composed of workers from various industries and neighborhoods and delegates to organized communities on a

block by block basis. He also emphasizes they need to reject black politicians, bureaucrats, and mayors from sort of co opting these efforts and ensuring that the community on the ground actually retains control over the institutions that they establish and develop and take control over to ensure that the community's needs and desires are met. One example that he uses is in the case of schools right where the community would organize parents, students, teachers, and community like to

cooperatively administer the schools. I think we see a lot of efforts by right wing parents right now organize and sort of run things in a lot of public schools, But that does mean it's similar efforts can't be taken by radicals to push for the same. Of course, it wouldn't be as easy because they aim to see the status school, whereas we aim to change things.

Speaker 2

I think it is sort of important to note too that it's like, it's not like this sort of like right wing school stuff came out of nowhere. Like part of the reason this was happening was that like there had been movements inside the like inside.

Speaker 5

Sorry, let me if I say.

Speaker 2

There have been movements from teachers and from like inside the education system trying to sort of like, you know, we do things I teach black history, right, and you know, like part like these are these are things that like, these are kinds of movements that people really tend to ignore and really tend to sort of not think about the significance of. But yeah, I mean it's it's it's not like these sort of like right wing versions of this.

Speaker 5

Came out of know where.

Speaker 2

They were reaction to people, you know, doing a sort of more moderate version of the strategy.

Speaker 8

Yeah, that's true. That is true, And so now we have to push even harder to counter their counter efforts and really assuite that sort of transformation in the education space and beyond just the education space. What Even talks about is ensuring that these councils encompass a variety of organizations, not just blocking neighborhood communities, but also labor union, student groups, social activist groups and even specialists you or single issue

campaigns and issues. The idea is, of course, to continuously promote self rule, to continuously develop people's powers and drives and consciousness towards liberation, and to continuously offer an alternative to this pervasive sense that all this is is all they can ever be. It's necessary to sort of incubate this sort of embryo of a revolutionary society, this micro cause of a new lifestyle, and to highlight the necessity

of struggle against you know, these systems. And when I speak of consciousness, I'm also speaking of specifically Black consciousness. Speaking of consciousness rais and sessions to ensure that black history, black culture is accessible and available and understood by the

black community. To ensure that newly liberates and like social ideas and values are distributed within the community, to ensure that counselinine therapy are available, rooted, and of course a black revolutionary perspective tell people to realize that this disunity and distrust and violence and oppression, that because due to this legacy end of this system does not have to continue to be so. But that's it for me and

for Irvin. For now you can join us for part two where we can dive into the day to day aspects. So there's viable programs that Irvin describes to build black resilience in the air. And now if you're looking for me on the internet, you can find me on YouTube dot com slash andeurism and you can support on patuon dot com slash saying Peace. And welcome back to another episode of It Could Happen here with myself Andrew of

the YouTube channel Andewism if you're joining us. From the previous episode, we touched on the life of Lorenzo Cambo Irvin who he was as a leading figure in the black anarchist movement, how he ended up in that position, sort of his life story and how he ended up writing Anarchism the Black Revolution and sort of breaking down that vision of a Black revolution, including tactics like communes, squats, French strikes, tax strikes, boycotts, general strikes, and of course

a Black labor federation. But that's not all that Uven has explored in his work, and today we're going to dive into his vision for survival programs, things to agitate for and actions the black community can take to survive

under the current system now. Historically, black communities have been subjected to economic exploitation, with businesses and financial institutions often taken profits out of the community without investing in its growth and development, and this of course has led to disinvestment, poverty, lack of resources of community members, and of course persistent

relative deprivation. So the demand for community control of businesses and financial institutions that even outlines, is something that seeks to shift power and resources back into the hands of the community. By place and control in the hands community members provides an opportunity to build economic power and to ensure that businesses and financial institutions work for communities rather than vice versa, because such institution and businesses would be

under the control of the workers themselves. So in a cooperative model, members work together to achieve common goals and share the benefits and risks of a business equally. The covenant structure for cooperative typically involves board of directors who might elected by members to make strategic decisions on behalf of the cooperative, but there of course other ways of

organizer and including horizontal consensus. All members of a cooperative have an equal say in these decisions, with each member typically having one food and the board of directors is meant to just be accountable to members and act in the best interest of the cooperative. Now cooperatives already exist, they operate in various industries, and they can operate in various industries including agriculture, retail, finance, housing, healthcare, and more.

For example, in a cooperative agriculture model, farmers can prove resources to purchas seeds, fertilizers, and equipment lower cost, and then sell their crops collectively to increase bargaining power and reduce costs. In a retail cooperative, members can buy products at a discount and how a saying the type of products offered, while in a financial cooperative, members can access banking services and share in the profits they're generated by

the cooperative. Cooperatives also often provide mutual aid and support to their members, with surplus profits from the businesses reinvested either in the businesses or distributed as dividends to members, which ensures that the benefit to the business are shared equatively and members have a stake in the success of a cooperative. Like I mentioned, corporators already exist, which means they are capable of operating within capitalism, but within a

broader program of social revolution. They're meant to build our alternative power in a dual power struggle to eventually enable us to assert our independent from this system as it will. But even here now, it is necessary to survive under this system, and I think cooperatives offer a more humane

and more empowering model. Another example of that sort of cooperative structure could be found in mutual lead banking societies, again owned and controlled by the members, and are created specifically to provide access to financial services and support to individuals and communities that have been traditionally excluded or marginalized

from a lot of traditional banking systems. So they function to provide low interest loans to members for various purposes including you know, starts and businesses, purchasing homes, covering unexpected expenses, and members are required to you know, put in a certain amount each month to fund these sorts of loans, and in addition to providing financial services sort of societies can also provide education and support, help with financial planning,

help with budgeting, help with financial literacy to enable members to better survive within their current financial situation under capitalism. And so that's one aspect of the survival program, right, and emphasis on survival it existed now in this system. So that's one aspect of pushing for community controller businesses and financial institutions and creating community cooperatives and mutual aid

banking societies. Another aspect of that survival program that open outlines is achieving community controlled housing to help address is to use of gentrification, displacement, and lack of affordable housing through legal and legal means such as then strikes and demonstrations, arn't actions, open squad in, drive landlords out and take over the property. Those are more precarious approaches, right, and then they're also be above the board methods. I spoke

about those approaches. Some of those approaches in the first part the quote unquote above the board methods would be establishing things like community land trusts or colts. A CLT is essentially a nonprofit organization that owns and manages land

for the benefit of a community. The CLT can acquire land and then lease it to developers or residents who agree to use the land for affordable house which allows them to retain control of the land and ensure there's been used for their good rather than being solo off the private developers for the sake of profit. In a situation under a CLT where a homeowner wants to sell wants to move, they can only sell the building that they occupy. They can't sell the land itself because the

community land Trust retains control of the land. The Community land Trust also retains the right of first refusal to purchase the buildings, which basically means before you can try and sell the building to anyone else, you have to give the Community land Trust, the community itself an opportunity to buy the building back, and that would enable them to also make sure that people aren't coming into just profit off of such affordable holes in and they're also

doing it so that the house in stay is affordable, so they can ensure that they can resell the building to somebody who's also seeking that, you know, affordable housing. And by providing that sort of house in, community land trusts can stabilize communities and prevent displacement in the long term. They can help to revitalize distress neighborhoods, and they can also invest into things like community facilities like pools, and

laundromats and gyms and that sort of thing. In terms of how you actually create a colt, laws of course vary from place to place, but essentially you form a nonprofit organization, obtain tax exam status, acquire the land either through purchase or donation, and then begin developing affordable house or community facilities on the land. In addition to that, a community an trust would need to guidelines in place for leasing the land home owners and to maintain the

affordability of the land over time. And of course, community an trust requires a system of governance and decision making to engage in that sort of ongoing effort of involving the residents themselves and ensuring that they are educated, and how comuntland trusts work, and how this model could be expanded to other communities. For the start, abolition such a

thing requires significant resources. Another approach to community controlled housing that also takes some resources is through limited equity housing cooperatives. So in this model, residents own and manage the house development. Each have a same decision making process to run democratically. They each have a share in the cooperative, which gives

them the right to occupy a unit in development. The share price, however, is set at a fixed rate, which means the unit can only be sold back to the cooperative at the same price, which again helps to make sure that the housing remains affordable in the long term. So, unlike with the community land trust where you own the building but you don't own the land, in an LHC or limited equity housing cooperative, you don't own the building or the land, You own a share and the cooperative

owns the property itself. You're also required, of course, to contribute a down payment and to pay monthly fees, which helps to maintain and manage the property. You know, it's difficult to organize things, as anyone with some experience organizing can tell you, and something as high investment as housing is no different, right. It's a challenge. It's a challenge in fundraising, it's a challenge in organizing people. It's a challenge and insurance that such efforts are defended and able

to establish themselves in the long term. But it's still a promising model I believe for survival because of its priority on community ownership and control. It really relieves that one major stress in a lot of people's lives in terms of affordable housing. Of course, the long term ors and should be decommodified entirely, but that is the future.

The survival program is for the heir now. Another aspect of this fiber program that even talks about is food autonomy, the establishments of black community controlled food systems to establish self sufficiency, to control the production, distribution of foods, and should basic needs to met to ensure that Black communities are no longer at the mouseea of food deserts and

other systemic barriers to accessing healthy, affordable food. By creating trucking networks and warehouses and community farms, farmers cooperatives, food cooperatives, agricultural unions, and other collective associations, black communities can ensure that healthy and essential foods are readily available. Rather than just treating the symptom, such institutions would treat the root cause of food and security, which is a lack of

control over our food chains and food networks. So, for example, a trucking network would be used to transport food from communal farms to warehouses which could serve as clecterly owned distribution centers for the food in a sort of a library economy set in the waite houses can also save us storage facilities for other non perishable food items, to bank seeds to distribute those seeds and other items and tools to community gardens and food cooperatives, and such community

gardens could be established on vacant lots, on rooftops and unused spaces within the city, particularly in areas where access to fresh produce is limited, and all these efforts would involve members of the community who would be responsible for each step in the process and ensuring that such things

are accessible equatively. Food cooperatives within communities could for example, be organized through sort of a share structure where each household or each individual has a share in the cooperative that entitles them to sit down to food each week. Or you could have in a sort of a library structure that a lot of different ways that you can organize it. You could even have as well. Agricultural unions provide support and training and education unsustainable farming practices, access to tools

and equipment, financial systems for farmers in need. All these efforts would establish the foundation necessary for food or autonomy under this sort of survival program that Eve has developed, and as I mentioned in the previous episode, even also talks about under the survival programs, developing autonomous education, ensuring the community has control over every aspect of the educational system, from the curriculum, textbooks, to the hiring and training of teachers, administrators,

And as I spoke about in the previous episode, you know, the same way the reactionary is fighting advocate for control of educations, the same way that we can do the same. It won't be as easy, but we have to counter their efforts because they've already been countering hours the minimal gains we've made, and for example, ensuring that an accurate account of history is told in schools is already being

fought against, so we need to go even further. Community controlled schools would not only reflect community values, culture and history. Not only would they be designed to meet the specific needs of the children within them. Not only do they provide us safe and a nutrient environment, encourage creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving skills, but they would also provide a space, an additional space for the development of people's powers and

drives and consciousness towards liberation at any age. I mean, in addition to primary and secondary education, Woven also talks about free higher education programs, remedial training programs, reading programs, trade programs, all these things to help develop people's skills and education knowledge that would helped equip them to address social, political,

and economic issues. If it also calls for a system of community based self defense to defend ourselves against various forms of violence, including police brutality, heat crimes, and vigilanty attacks, without relying on government or law enforcement agencies to defend or set else, they had several components to this. Of course, you'll involved organizing and mobilizing community members to participate in self defense training programs. It would involve weapons training, It

would involve tactics for de escalation. It would involve a network that can coordate responses to incidents of violence, establishing community channels to quickly disseminate information, enabling restorative and transformative justice practices to be included to keep the state out

of resolving the conflicts between people in communities. And then, of course, unlike a lot of these law enforcement systems and structures, a community based self defense program or system would also be involved in the prevention of such incidents

of violence and harm and conflict from recurrent. It will be involved in continuously evaluating interchange in circumstances, to analyze in the patterns of violence and gaps that are taking place in training or in resources, and to continuously refine tactics and strategies and approaches to see to the long term healing of the communities and the interruption of cycles

of violence and generational trauma in the long term. Another component of these survival programs would involve medical training, large scale medical training programs in black communities providing individuals with the knowledge and skills needed to understand and address health issues. Black communities, especially those from low income backgrounds in the US, often face significant barriers to access in quality healthcare. It's

due to systemic racism and oppression. So it's due to inaccessibility and an affordability of healthcare just generally, and also the quality and resources af felable within certain communities specifically, and also the ways that health outcomes are worse if you are black. Black mothers are, or rather the black maternal death rate is one particularly heavy example of these

sorts of disparities. And so that's why we need community based medical clinics and training programs and workshops and seminars led by black medical professionals, public health experts, public health experts, and community organizers who are versed in the social sernants of health and impacts of systemic racism and health outcomes, and invested in seeing that changed. Such a program would involve medical including dental training, empower individuals to provide basic

health care services and support their communities. You would involve trading in first aid. You involve healthcare screenings, health education, because underrepresentation in health matters, lack of education in one's own personal health matters, and two people losing their lives as a result of that racial blind spot and as a result of that inequality, and so survival program in

the here and now needs to account for that. Even also calls for the release of black political prisoners as part of a broader abolitionist struggle rooted in the recognition that the criminal justice system in the US has been used as a tool for political repression against black people and the martialized communities. You're speaking here from experience, of course,

he wrote this when he was in prison. Mass and conceration of black people has been deliberate and systemic effort to silence and dissent, to silence dissent and maintain the

statusco of white supremacy and white supremacist capitalism. Here and now, survival programs should be involved in the release of black political prisoners, especially to investigate and review the cases of those who have been unjustly imprisoned, to address the use of cost confessions, falsified evidence, and other forms of prosecutorial misconduct there has led to wrongful convictions that has led to people rotten away in jail cells for decades with

no sort of justice. I mean, these people are often so of the most committed and dedicated revolutionaries and their

continued imprisonment has been a craving justice. Some of them unfortunately passed before they're even released if they have released a tool and by demanding their release, by fighting for their freedom, by writing to them and supporting them even now, by showing our solidarity with those who have sacrificed so much in the struggle for liberation and ensuring that their voices are heard, not only can we aid in their survival, but we can also aid in our own. Lastly, even

calls for the ever contentious big payback reparations. You have then challenges us to build a mass movement in our communities to compel the government and the rich to provide the means for our community is redevelopment at the centuries of slavery and of abuse, and of robbery and of discrimination, demanding those reparations in the form of community development funds to be placed in credit unions, cooperatives and not the mutual aid institutions in the black community, so we can

start to obtaining some measure of economic self sufficiency. But of course from the question of who pays, to how we force them to pay, to how we determine how much they pay, how that pay is distributed or implemented, if the pay is even in cash. You know, there's a lot of tensions surrounding that topic and pro reparation. It's not just for Black America, with the entire diaspora. I mean, I've seen the US made sure to get reparations for itself and its allies after World War Two.

The victims of various atrustees have received reparations for the injustices. But as soon as Black people demand their do demand their do everybody, you know, they want us to forget about it. But yeah, everybody knows, and I think part of that is because everybody knows that they can't actually afford it. You know, if we were paid exactly what we would do, they would not have the wealth that they have. And so my stance has always been I don't think reparations will come by ballot. I don't want

it to come by ballot. I don't want to receive some check in the mail it says, okay, now be happy, get over it, but let me not get myself in any more trouble. Even at that, I don't think it will come by a ballot.

Speaker 5

There's a lot of things that's reasonable.

Speaker 8

Yeah, I've already said so much in these past two episodes. I mean, there are a lot of arms to this survival program. Then bring things to a close a bit. There as a lot of areas of struggle that we can pick up, a lot of things that can be applied. Of course, most of these things I think could be

applied beyond the black community. But there's a reason that the black community specifically was Urban's focus, because of his life experience, because of the need to address black communities specifically in uh in an anarchist text, something that was really lacking prior to the resurgence of you know, the black radical tradition, the black anarchist specific tradition in the seventies.

So it's necessary. But I just hope, you know, people who are listening who on that black didn't just you know, click off, that I still hear that these ideas and stuff, these programs are applicable more broadly. I hope that I can see and contribute to these changes in my lifetime, and as I consistently borrow from Ashanti Alston, another black anarchist figure who I actually hope at some point we could bring on or power to all the people.

Speaker 5

Peace.

Speaker 7

Hello podcast fans, and welcome to it could happen here A podcast Today is hosted by me James Down and Mia Wong Hi May. Hello, Hi, So what we're going to talk about today is situation on the border. We're working on a scripted episode which will take away because they always do, and you know, if we want that

to be nice and sort of polished for youse. But I did want to update everyone because I think that what's happening it has a sense of urgency to it, and certainly like some of the mutual aid requests have a real sense of urgency to them, and folks who follow me on Twitter dot com and ll have noticed that, like in between the ship posts, I've been down at the US Mexico border for most of the tail end of last week and the start of this week, sort

of depicting what's going on there, along with my friend Joe Joe Ariyama's who's a freelancer who we're going to be working with on the scripted series. And people can find Joe at Joe or Ori e photo on Twitter. Joe's got some really good photos if you want to

see kind of what's going on. But the longer than the short of it is that title forty two ended on well to begin with, exactly the moment that it ended was a subject of some contention, right, we knew it was going to end on the eleventh of May. Title thirty two, if folks don't remember, is a emergency public health measure. It's part of the United States Public Health Law, the United States Code Public Health something something then allows border patrol to expel people from the United

States without giving them their due process, their asylum here. Basically, they bounce them straight back to Mexico, right, And this has been in place since March of twenty twenty. We now know that the Trump administration pressured the CDC, So in theory it was it came through the CDC, right the Center for Disease Control under pressure from Drug administration, direct pressure from Pence, and Stephen Miller was yeah.

Speaker 2

Probably this was a Stephen Miller like, yeah, supremacy special.

Speaker 7

Yeah, bubblehead looking racist motherfucker has once again done something terrible. Not that some of his policies. As we'll get onto this in descripted episode, the Biden administration has like copy pasted some steep, some straight up Stephen Miller stuff in its transit bounds and is absolutely liable for I don't want to use the word chaos at our border because

that plays into this Fox use narrative. There is a very concerted plan to make people suffer more than is necessary at our border, and it would have been very easy to avoid this. So title forty two basically, there are no consequences for crossing, but it's also very hard to get asylum. The CBP officer can like spontaneously decide

to give you your rights. Basically, if you're like, come on, bro, I'm going to get killed if I go home, then that person can decide to allow you to be processed for asylum, which is what a lot of the Ukrainian folks got surprise, surprise.

Speaker 2

And I feel like we should we should also mention that under like multiple legal frameworks, you have the right to request asylum. This is this is something that supposedly is inviolable, Like you have the right as a human being to request asylum in a country.

Speaker 7

Yes, and it doesn't matter where you've been before, and it doesn't matter how you got there, and you don't have to do it at a port of entry. It doesn't matter how you enter the country or where you entered the country. Yes, yeah, and yeah, under multiple different international frameworks you have the right to do this. But the USA has been denying that to people for three and a eight years now, right, three years and stuff like that, and you know what I mean.

Speaker 2

I also could just want to briefly mention this because I feel like there's this way in which people people people will talk about like one border regime and then never connect the dots between this one and the other ones. But like, for example, like this is something that happens all over the world world. Yes, I mean like part part of like part of the sort of like crisis that is going on into Dan right now is about like a ship ton of money. But the end this

is actually happened in Libya too. It's the Italian government paying the Libyan and sort of Sudanese parabilitaries a ship ton of money to like keep refugees like basically like trap to something, to enslave them in camps, to cute them from like getting to Italy to try to request asylum. So yeah, so this is a yeah, like Fredecks does this like this, This is sort of like a global.

Speaker 5

Yeah, terrible regime.

Speaker 7

The border like industrial complex is every bit as bad, if not worse than the defense industrial complex. So we're more familiar with, like border policing is something that really came post nine to eleven, right with the creation of DHS and the United States, but we have exported that shit everywhere. And like our Border Patrol Agents r CBP has an office in lots of embassies or like they train Dominican border agents the border with Haiti, for instance,

and are trained by our CBP people. CBP agents were deployed in Iraq, Afghanistan. Yeah, this is a global thing. Yeah, And like where I guess where I am now, where I've been for a while, is the place where that all began, right, and where we continue to see CBP innovating new and exciting ways to fucking take some of the most desperate people in the world and make them suffer and spend a shit ton of money and preventing them from accessing their legal right to asylum or detaining

them while they do it. And so what has happened is so Title forty two was supposed to end on the eleventh of May, right, that was when the federal COVID emergency ended, So there was no reason for it to exist anymore. There wasn't a reason for it to exist to begin with.

Speaker 2

But yeah, any like, don't don't don't think too hard about the fact that like that was the last that was basically the last COVID policy that was still in place.

Speaker 7

Yeah, Like there were not vaccine mandates for the people meeting the migrants at the fucking border, Yeah, right, Like.

Speaker 2

This was this was this was never about public health, Like no, you know, I mean, and in so far as you can extricate sort of like the sort of imperial estates public health measures from social cleansing stuff, which has been happening for generations and generations. But yeah, like this was this was not about that, like this, Yeah, this was just an immigration ban.

Speaker 7

Yeah, and it became a sort of albatross by an administration who didn't want to be hit on border stuff.

Speaker 5

Right.

Speaker 7

They didn't want to They didn't want to drop it before the midterms. They initially band to drop it in December twenty twenty two, which is obviously right after the mid terms. They didn't we here we are in May. There was a complicated legal challenge, which there always is, and it doesn't matter because here we are right and it's supposed to drop in the to me, so we're all thinking, right, midnight on the tenth of May, we'll

be out there. We'll see what goes down. They announced the day before that it is dropping on midnight on the eleventh, So they're going to ring every minute knit out of it. And so in the days before, a number of migrants have told me that they understood that they basically had to get across before the end of Title forty two, because it was their understanding that if they crossed under Title eight they would be ejected, and they wouldn't be allowed to return for five years and

they would face felony charges. So they did this. I don't quite know often these this information spreads about like WhatsApp in camps, right, or sort of like like a game of Telephone in camps. So I don't quite know where this information came from, but it closely parallels something that majorcus Is, a Secretary of Home lanun Security, said in press conference where he mischaracterized international immigration law. And

he's done this multiple times. Right, He himself, someone who is a migrant to this country who apparently family left Cuba when he was one year old, has just some of the most dogshit statements on the record, and I've depicted some of those in the scripted episode. Folks up my piece I wrote for NBC a couple of years ago about the Biden administration's policy towards Haiti if they they want to see more of the dogshit stuff that

he and Biden have said. And so in the days before the end of Title forty two, a lot of folks started to try to cross right because of this information that they had. They ended up at least where I am, which is in southern California, right, the sort of extreme southwestern border in the United States, literally the end of the wall. Folks were crossing like around the end of the wall right at low tide and turning themselves into border patrol asking to make their case for

their right to asylum. And I think sometimes when we think about migrants, you know, we made me think about people from South America or Central America, every single continent, maybe not any like Australasians, but like just in it. In a day at one camp, I spoke to someone from Angola. I spoke to someone from Congo. I spoke to someone from Sudan. I spoke to a Kurdish guy. I spoke to people certainly from all over South America, Russians,

Tagik people, Jamaican people, and like. For instance, just to give you a sense of like how global it is, I spoke to a Jamaican lady who was caring for a sixteen or seventeen year old pair of Tagiq siblings who didn't speak any of the relevant languages for communication with border patroller with other people in the camp, so she would use her phone to call their mother, who spoke some English, give information to the mother who would

translate it. Back to these two young children, and all of these people had presented like there were a lot of Afghan people too. Probably should have mentioned that up top, But these are the people who we fucking abandoned once and now we're trapping, trapping them in between little fences.

And it's hot in the day, right like I slept out in the desert last night and it was above one Hundred's not that hot in San Diego, but in her Cumber where they're also holding people, it's absolutely getting into triple digits every day, and it's cold at night, and it's a really inhospitable environment for people. So folks were held there, you know, up to a week in some cases, and are now I think being processed by a border patrol. There was a ruling by a Florida judge.

I'm not exactly clear on when because I was down at the border and my phone didn't work very well, but at some point right before Title forty two drop that they could have been released on humanitarian parole, which means in theory they have to be released with a court date, right with a court date to appear for their asylum hearing, which will slow down the process of releasing them, right, And so I've heard of court dates.

I've heard of folks being released already kind of with court dates in twenty twenty seven, which this whole thing has just been like a disaster in terms of the federal response, right like, and in just the cruelest possible way.

Speaker 3

It was.

Speaker 7

Everyone could see this coming, right that there will be more people trying to cross. There are sixteen thousand people give or take in Tijuana alone, So it's just across from where I live, waiting to come to the United States because they've been denied that right for three years, because they need somewhere safe to go, and because they're not safe there. And the best estimate we got for how many they could process from border patrol was two hundred a day at the Tijuana porta Ventry or Sunny

Cedro port of entry, really, but we don't know. There's no clear I don't know how many people they're processing every day, right, But these people who do come in now have to have a hearing date before they can

be released. When if they get through, So I spoke to a young man and his son who I'd spoken to at the border, and he had been released into the United States where a charity in San Diego will provide him with two nights, what like two nights of accommodation, right, and then it can't quite work out what then, like he's out on his own, you know, Like I guess we'll find out tonight. But he has to find a sponsor.

I don't quite understand how he was released without a sponsor, but it seems like the system is kind of bungling things up, and these folks have to fund their own flights to wherever it is. A sponsor is right, so they have family or community, they're having to work out how to get to that family and community, so be there the greyhound or a plane or a train. So it all in all a giant classifuck with very human consequences.

Like I can't stress enough how like every possible demographic is represented, old people, little tiny children, right, Like I was talking to a little Afga and girl, not really talking to we don't share any languages, but I was more just like making funny faces for a while and sort of pointing at things.

Speaker 4

And.

Speaker 7

Like it just breaks my heart that there are little children who like especially you know, she's a little girl, she's from Afghanistan. We told her shit ton of lies about Afghan women to justify twenty years of killing people, of certain people making money from killing people, and like this was supposedly they're like canard was that this was for Afghan girls and women, Right, And here's an Afghan girl sleeping in the fucking dirt, like twenty twenty minutes

from where I live. And I can't even give this kid like hot meal because I can't fit it through the bars of the fence. Like everything that goes across to these people has to go through the bars of the fence. Right, someone worked out that pizza, pizza could fit through because flat right, people have been getting pizza. But other than that, they're getting you know, bottles of water, granola bars, you know things that fit through a fence,

beef jerky. And they've been there for days in some cases. And that's a camp that's relatively accessible, right, I can pull off the interstate, drive down a dirt road and be there in like I say, twenty minutes. The camps are less accessible. We've heard the conditions are much worse. A couple of Jamaican guys told me that there was another camp that we we tried to get access to it, weren't able to get access to that was further west from where we were, where people were hungry. They're getting

this is all just from that source. I have reached out a border patrol, but as of today, they haven't got back to me, saying that they were getting a bottle of water and a granola bar every day, and that like some of these other folks had taken it upon themselves to like walk over there to try and get them food, right, people who already not in the great situation themselves, and they kept asking why couldn't we

go there, Why couldn't we help them? Like it was very admirable right to see folks who are in a pretty bad way be like, hey, these people need help more than we do. So, yeah, that's a situation. I think we should take a break for advertising then sorry, I ye, yeah, hopefully not for a drone or some shit. All right, we're back, and this is another happy and exciting episode in which I tell you things that will

brighten your day. So something I wanted to talk about because I think it's important is the mutual aid response to this, and it's been really really impressive, you know, I live in a place where the Democrats are absolute dog shit. Well we'll do It's America, right, but like just the particularly cringe like cast real liberalism of San Diego Democrats is like as always on display.

Speaker 3

Right.

Speaker 7

I saw one of them tweeting today how CBS, DHS and CBP are doing a great job and keeping us safe, and like my like it makes me want to say things I shouldn't say on the podcast, I guess. But what that means is that, like, our government isn't going to do shit, right, Like, it is entirely on us to look after each other. And people have done that.

The groups like American Friends Service Committee, which is a great organization which has really good stuff on the boarder, have been down there every single day, right, Like there have been days when I've left at one am there's still someone there. They've been giving people water, giving people food. A huge need that people have is to charge their phones. And the way that migrants interact with CBP, at least in theory, the way you get an asylum appointment is

booking it through an app called CBP one. We've talked about this on the podcast before, but CBP one is terrible. It is a terrible app that doesn't work. And that's for people who have phones and Wi Fi. Right, if you are stuck in between two fences and a dusty piece of ground, how the hell are you supposed to charge your phone? You don't have Wi Fi, right, you may not have a data plan that works in that area.

So a huge unmet need was charging charging phone. So we were able to get some donations from the team and buy a big charger. Other folks turned up with charges. Even all the news orgs I see to include, like like Fox National weren't there, which is a good thing, but like we could talk about that actually as well. My goods will specifically ask which news network you're with,

which I think is that. I think that's good. I think it's good they tell Fox News to fuck off, because, yeah, someone who participates in your dehumanization doesn't also deserve to

make money from your trauma. And so every news network that was there, right or the called folks from San Diego were just constantly shuttling back and forth to their bands, charging phones constantly, constantly, constantly, and it became a bit of a cluster because obviously there's literally just hundreds of people in this small area, dozens of hands reaching to a defense, Charge my phone? Can I have my phone back?

Charge my phone? And in the English and Spanish and French and command Gye and Vietnamese and all these other languages, right, So it was very hard to organize that. So folks came down, Folks from San Diego, from different sort of mutual aid groups came down and they organized the system. Right. They got Painter's tape, the names of the people on the back of the phone. We had this huge ash battery that we were able to get and that they were able to charge people's phones, get them their phones

back to them. And that is a crucial thing, right in that scenario. Not only is it your only way to communicate with border patrol, it's your only way to communicate with your family.

Speaker 5

Right.

Speaker 7

Like one guy had lost his phone, and so I just bought him a burner phone or you know, one of those warm artphones so that he could call his family because the family didn't know where he was. Right last they'd heard he was in Mexico or maybe even

further south. And so the phones are super important. Other mutual ad groups have been getting blankets, right, And I saw an Afghan family turn up and had they had crayons for the Afghan kids who were there, right, and like coloring books and things for children to do, because it's probably boring being a kid, and it's probably scary being a kid, where like every day men with guns and camouflage gear turn up and they speak a language you don't understand, and then you don't know what they say,

and then you stay there.

Speaker 2

Yeah, and I want to kind of just there are lots of things that could get called camps that are like not camps, right, Like this is like this this is not a camp in the sense of like there are buildings that you go into or even like there are ten it's just like, oh yeah, no, yeah, I think that's.

Speaker 7

A very good I think that I haven't mentioned, thank you.

Speaker 5

Yes.

Speaker 7

This is people lying on the dirt. Occasionally, they have a my last space blanket. Occasionally they have a top. If they want to make any form of shelter they have to use the only thing they have to use is the wall itself. Right, So up against the wall, people have made like a lean to kind of situation with the top, right, But no, this is by no means suitable shelter. Literally, people are lying on the dirt.

Speaker 5

Like it's just a fucking cage like in a desert.

Speaker 2

Like it's yeah, it's it's, it's, it's, it's it's it's the kind of thing that like, like you it's the kind of thing you would put it in a Poclyst movement.

Speaker 5

People will be like, oh, no, one would ever do that. Shit.

Speaker 2

It's like no, no, Like this is just sort of yeah, this is what US border policy is.

Speaker 5

It's these like just these open air cages.

Speaker 7

Yeah, it's you wouldn't like, you know, I go to the zoo in San Diego and the animals much better conditions than that. There's no running water. There was one porterloo toilet for five hundred people. Yeah, it's terrible. It is awful. It's little. It's people wrapping their babies in my love blankets and trying to get them to sleep at night, you know. And that's the same as several

places up and down the border. Right they're starting to clear them out now, So sort of Tuesday Monday, So some people got there a week ago, I think, and so they've been staying there for a long time. And yeah, like it's no point does there seem to have been any consideration for even giving people shade or shelter or like, Yeah,

the very basics, and like I should reinforce it. In twenty eighteen, when Trump blocked a large group of migrants from entering the United States, the government of Mexico did considerably better than this. It was by no means a good situation for those children at all, but they did better than this. Which it's aventally extremely low bar to clear, but we have failed to clear it completely as a country. And that's kind of to our eternal shame, I think.

Speaker 2

Yeah, and I think and everything worth emphasizing about this is that it hasn't always been like this. There's there's this sort of image that's been constructed that this is always what the US border has been. No, I mean it's not like it's not it's not like American border policy has always been like good.

Speaker 5

But I mean, like in my lifetime, it wasn't likely.

Speaker 7

Yes, in the mid nineties there were four thousand border patrol agents. Yeah, it's increased by a factor of ten, and its budget probably by more than that.

Speaker 2

Yeah, And you know the consequences of this is just basically in order to appease a bunch of just sort of like fucking like turbo racist baked dipshits like who live in the suburbs and you know, have no have like never experienced a single hardship and their entire lives like fucking like untold numbers of people are put through just in human suffering and for fucking nothing, just just like for for nothing, for like just dog shit electoral pandering.

Speaker 7

Yeah, by people who have never seen what goes on at the border. They've never experienced where these people come from. And yeah, it's they're just numbers to people in DC, right, And I would really urge people to not read immigration coverage, or watch immigration coverage, or listen to immigration coverage that isn't written by people at the border, because this isn't

a fucking issue about numbers. Like every single one of those numbers is a person who has people they love and things that they've done and choices that they've made that got them there, and every single one of them is someone who deserves compassion and empathy. And it's not just another you know, like a number in an Excel chart,

which is how it's treated. And yeah, it has always been this way This is a very recent innovation, and it's I mean we've talked about this before as well, but right, this is the proving ground for state surveillance, state violence, fascism, all these things. Right, the reason that you got surveilled by a drone if you went to a George Floyd protest in Minneapolis is because the Border Patrol already had one. The reason that cops listened into your phone if you went to some protest in twenty

twenty is because of border patrol technology. Right, they have these sting ray towers all up and down the border. Robert and I have seen him in Mexico, sorry, in Texas even.

Speaker 2

Yeah, and I mean, you know, even even stuff like this, this is the sort of recent laws in places like Florida and Texas that are you know, led the state steel trans kids, right like that. That's also stuff that was sort of like, yeah, like the prototype of that came from the I mean like it came from the border. There's it's also something that came from sort of like like anti black bullshit that like is sort of deeply

rooted in like American family planning bullshit. But like, yeah, like that that's also another one of the places where like that stuff was tested.

Speaker 7

And with indigenous folks, like we've ripped Indigenous children for their families for decades. But yeah, we it's a deeply baked white supremacist system that always does its experimenting on

marginized people are very often at the border. But yeah, if you if you're worried about the government intercepting your communications with an abortion care provider, that has happened because at some point they've been allowed to do stuff to migrants that was equally bad, if not worse, And and like this will hurt you even if you are like Kathy the liberal in Minnesota, like when we let the state have these powers, they don't just use them benevolently,

and that they weren't using them benevolently in the first place. Read like they say innocent people who've done nothing wrong.

Speaker 2

Yeah, I mean that's that's the thing about state power is and any any power the state has, inevitably they will wonder you it on you. And so you can't let them take shit like this because you know they will. They will turn your entire society into a sort of hell Garrison state.

Speaker 7

Yeah, and it's just I don't know that the inhumanity that your taxes pay for for listening to this in America is abhorrent. It's disgusting, and yeah, you should do everything you can to stop it. And like, this probably is one of the instances where like you may be able to do something of some value by writing to a politician. It's certainly one of the instances where if you live near the border, you can show up and

make a very meaningful difference to someone's whole experience. Right, Like myself and Joe were down there when this this guy had lost his phone, and like, you know, it wasn't that expensive to buy this guy a phone. Other like people will remember Mandy and people will remember Alex, who are two guests I've had on different San Diego episodes that they've both been down there. I know Alex gave his EpiPen to someone who needed an epipenn, like

we acutely needed an EpiPen. Like things like that, you can maybe save someone's life, maybe just make someone's day a little bit less shit. You know, maybe you can let a kid kick a football and you'd have to deflate the football to get it through the defense early, but like, you know, you can give a doll to a little kid so they can play with it or something. Do somethink that will for a moment take them out of the utterly miserable place that we force them into.

And if folks want to support that, I know I'd posted Mandy's cash app and Venmo and I think some people very generously did contribute, which is great. If you're not at the border, look at Border Kindness, which is a group out of San Diego who I know are doing aid runs to Cucumber. I think the Houcumber Hotel Hukumba for those not familiar, Jacu Mba the Hookumber Hotel was housing folks and providing it there a huge amount

of water and shelter to people this morning. People can look at the American French Service Committee that I wrote about, and I know that Joe and myself have shared some Amazon wish lists that people have and that kind of thing. But it's it's a massive task, but it's not one

that's like insurmountable. The amount of people I've seen show up to include like and you know, I'm not a religious person and I'm not a person who particularly cares for organized religion either, but it does make me happy when I see like old church ladies in high heels with perms coming out and like giving water to children, charging phones and seeing I think it's like, certainly I've lived on the border for fifteen years. It's been a

fundamentally radicalizing experience for me. Like I think you're supposed to grow old and grow out of your anarchist politics

or whatever. But I don't know how anyone could live here and think that like police state good it's and I think anybody who can get down here should it's good for you too, Like and I always think about how oscoor why child has this thing about like how seeing people living on the streets like not only undermind stare humanity, but also his humanity, because like seeing someone else suffering should make us feel bad, and so like he benefits when he helps someone, and like you know,

we're all lifted up, right, Like I I guess one of the things I struggle with most of the journalist is that like that like feeling of living in comfort while other people can't, especially when it's such like it's one thing if I if I go somewhere, right, if I'm in Myanmar and I'm aware that things are difficult and scary, and then I get on a plane and

it takes two days when I come back. But just from like a personal like mental health perspective, seeing a little child sleep in the dirt, right, or someone asking me for fucking bin back so they can keep their baby out of the rain like a trash back, or a kid without shoes, you know, and then going home to my relatively comfortable existence is really hard. And I think we should all have to face up to that because it's what it's what our government is responsible for.

And supposed we've got the best sucking option in twenty twenty, right, this is the this is this is the good choice of the two. But it doesn't make any meaningful difference whether you choose Trump or Biden to these people, right, because the best treat them like ship.

Speaker 2

Yeah, it's like the kids are still in cages. And yes, you know, until until until the entire system that enables the ship is destroyed and it can be right like, and this isn't even this, this isn't even on the on the level of sort of like you know of sort of anarchist politics, right like this, none of this ship existed twenty years ago, right, like this is this is like wow, okay, I guess it's twenty FOI three twenty five years ago.

Speaker 5

None of this ship existed even.

Speaker 2

Within like the framework of the nation state, right, Like, this is not a thing that you that we have to do, which we simply do.

Speaker 5

Not have to you.

Speaker 7

You could share politics with Bill Clinton and still.

Speaker 2

Ronald read was better on the fucking border than any than any president who has been alive in my fucking lifetime.

Speaker 5

Right, Yeah, fucking Reagan.

Speaker 7

Dwight Eisenhower would have had serious concerns about the industrial complex we're building at the border.

Speaker 2

Yeah, Like this is not like this, this, this isn't this isn't like a particularly radical political thing, right, It's just that we've we've become sort of a nerd to this death state that's built up around us, and you know, doesn't it doesn't keep anyone safe. It just fucking inflicts untold human misery. So fucking Greg Abbott can win an election.

Speaker 7

Yeah yeah, and it costs us a lot of money. Right, Like, your universal healthcare is an unmandrone flying over some children run across a desert in Arizona. Right now, Your free university education is a border patrol smart camera in the desert that goes off every time a fucking deer walks past. How it rains like it. This stuff is expensive and like, if you're in the US, you are paying for it. Yeah. I think the most sort of soft of liberals can

see that this is right. And they did see that this ship was wrong in the Trump administration, and they do see this is wrong when they come right, Like I've some of the best mutual aid groups I've worked with are like middle aged folks from churches who have time and the means to help and just didn't realize that it was like no one was coming and we had to do it ourselves. And when they did that, they were very effective. And so I would encourage folks

who are in border communities near the border. Near the border means a different thing of your border patrol because their jurisdiction applies one hundred miles.

Speaker 5

From the border.

Speaker 7

That's the other thing, right, the border will come to you.

Speaker 4

Yeah.

Speaker 2

Statistically, odds are that you are the border already has come to you.

Speaker 1

Yes, yeah, yeah.

Speaker 7

Two thirds of people in the United States are in the border patrol in for Smith Zone.

Speaker 5

Yeah, I'm in it, and I'm in like fucking Chicago, right.

Speaker 7

Oh yeah, like yeah, I think yes, people who would not think of themselves as bored as well as the border affects you. If you go to other communities in your city, you might realize border patroller around there, Ice

are around there. So yeah, it's it's pretty bleak. We're working on some scripted stuff, but I want to get into a bit of the history of border patrol and rereading Border Patrol Nation, which is a great book if people haven't read it, and I want The other thing I should say about border reporting is if people don't center migrants and they're reporting about migration, then you shouldn't be reading that reporting. Like sometimes it can be hard.

One other thing I guess I do want to say is you're seeing my photos and you're seeing Joe's photos, You're not going to see many faces. And that's because people have legitimate fears for their wellbeing. That's why they are fucking here. Yeah, and not obtaining consent before taking photographs is making a terrible situation worse, And like that's something that we can work on as a media, right, like something I will continue to call out when I see it. But if you don't speak the language, find

someone who does it. Don't take the goddamn photo. You'll see some face in the mind. Like I like to pass my camera through the fence and give it to like teenage kids so they can run around and take photos and have fun. And like so when they take like goofy selfies, I'll post those. They get concerned from them or their parents, and the parents are around it,

and that's fine. But yeah, when you're looking at border coverage, always understand that these are people and if we don't center those people and their stories, then we're doing it wrong.

Speaker 2

If you can physically get to these places, like you should, like the the the this is this is one of the like the situations where like the amount of good that like a very small number of people could do is enormous and the cost is not that high.

Speaker 7

No, but for instance, I some of my friends had just gone to Costco right and just loaded up one of those big Costco trolleys and like that that makes a meaningful difference to hundreds of people, And so you should. There will probably be mutual aid networks on the ground at almost every border area. By now, reach out to them, see if they need the money. If you can get

there and help organize, that's better. If you have skills, right, if you have language skills yours, like there are people I met a guy who spoke Commanji, like the Kurdish dialect of North and East Syria, right, people who speak Vietnamese almost every language you can conceive of.

Speaker 6

Right.

Speaker 7

Those people really struggle to get information and they just can't talk to anyone because there's no one else to talk to and their phone, you know, the phone charges is a precious commodity and it's cost a lot of money to dial into Nashley. So those people could just be lonely. So if you have those language skills, go. Someone broke their finger in San Diegore getting crushed up against the fence. If you know there was a medic there to help them. If they hadn't been, that could

have been worse for them. And you know, sometimes the ambulance can come in and take people out. But there are valuable, meaningful things that you could do if you have the time, if not, if you have the money, there are really important places to donate, and there's just a couple of them. Will highlight a couple more as we go forward. And one more thing I did want to plug is miles for migrants where if you have if you don't have money, but you do have airline miles.

Like I was speaking to this guy today who got across. He has two days and he has to get himself in New York where he has family. I don't have the means to buy four airline tickets or it would, but if you have air miles and you want to donate them, you can.

Speaker 2

Yeah, And then this is the thing, like you know, like I have family who, for example, like work at Hong Kong, right, and they have like you know, and they're like there are people like that who could are like, you know, not radicals, but are sort of you know, like you.

Speaker 5

Could like like there are people in.

Speaker 2

This world who have a shit of miles like built up because you know, for like work or some shit, right that's just sitting there, and that that's something that you know, like you can you can like like you you.

Speaker 5

May not have it. You might know people who do.

Speaker 7

Yeah, yeah, you might know someone who does a weird credit card flipping thing, you know, where they like get air miles in and make it their whole personality to to get air miles. But like whatever, if those people can help, yeah, you don't need to turn them into like Macnavists overnight. Like like, nobody wants to see a little baby sleep in the dirt, and anybody who could

be there physically would be appalled by it. And I think if you can convey to those folks that now at the time when something that costs them nothing materially, Yeah, right, Like I know tons of people have more miles that they can use because they fly at the time for work. You don't want to fly. When you're done flying, you want to stay at home. So that's another way that people can help. And yeah, just I guess it's a crisis that will continue unabated because the cruelty is the

point and it's for once. Like you know, we can't stop all the climate change and all this bad shit, but this is something that it is within our power to a bet, can't We can't make it go away yet. But like we spoke to the people who are doing border drops on the border, there are meaningful things that every single one of us can do to help.

Speaker 2

Yeah, go into the world. Do not let the violence done in our name be who we are.

Speaker 7

Yeah, sure, people, you're better than this.

Speaker 1

I guess, hey everyone, Robert here. Before we get into it, I want to note my internet was terrible during this call. We tried to have the guest record locally, but there is kind of a technical glitch there, and Zoom glitched a little on the audio. In order to make it listenable. There are going to be like three or four points here where I pop in and just say what he was trying to say or what he said, and the Internet then garbled up so that you can understand what's

actually being said in the conversation. So when my voice pops in and I read a line, it's me reading something that he said that got kind of distorted. I do apologize. Ah, welcome to it could happen here. A podcast about things falling apart and occasionally about the quest to build a better world. Today, we've got an episode that is in the latter category about the struggle to make the United Kingdom less I don't know, in the thrall of a monarchy and an aristocratic class, and to

build a more equitable society. And our guest today is somebody who is attempting to through that cause and did so last year by attempting to huck several eggs at the current King of England, Charles the I forget the number, Patrick, Well, how are you doing today? Hi?

Speaker 6

Yeah, I'm good. Thanks.

Speaker 4

Yeah. It was five eggs. Five eggs and he's the third king, the third k far more than three unfortunately.

Speaker 1

Yeah, you guys have had a few. Was one of the one she'll killed to Charles?

Speaker 6

Yeah, yeah, that was the last one.

Speaker 1

That was the last one. Well, I would say, yeah. So let's start by talking about this is in a twenty about a year ago at a he was doing a They called it a walkabout, which I guess is when the king shows up in a city in the video. I watched the video of this and like, there's a bunch of people dressed in all sorts of fun costumes, and some ladies got a massive sword, like a sword, a sword of the size that I know for a fact that man cannot lift above his head.

Speaker 6

Yeah, it's funny.

Speaker 4

He comes out of his little car and I know, all the little trumpets go and everyone starts, you know, waving their flags on queue and.

Speaker 6

Going like, look there he is. There.

Speaker 4

He is pretty unhinged, to be honest. It's it's it's quite embarrassing.

Speaker 1

But yeah, there's like the the American chauvinist in me that like wants to wants to laugh more about the monarchy. But I'm just finished reading an article about Diane Feinstein where the journalist interviewing her was like, so, you've missed a bunch of votes over the last three months, and she's like, no, I haven't. I've been working the whole time. So I guess we're all kind of enthrall to the corpses of of of our past.

Speaker 6

It's hierarchy. Hierarchy everywhere is the problem.

Speaker 1

So you decide to show up when you kind of find out that the king is going to be showing up here, and what kind of leads you to decide, I'm gonna I'm gonna throw some eggs in my pocket and take my shot.

Speaker 4

So I actually found out that he was coming to York about three days with a megaphone and you know, shout some cause obviously.

Speaker 6

The queen had died.

Speaker 4

About a month or so before, and during the funeral processions there was you know, several people were arrested for someone shouted at you know, Prince Andrew, you know, in Scotland's they were like, oh, you're a sick old man, and they did, and that was probably my inspiration. But then on the morning when he came to York, my megaphone was just like busted. So I was just like, oh, okay, I'm gonna gonna go get some eggs then.

Speaker 1

And white eggs. What what kind of led to that decision?

Speaker 6

Man? Everyone asked that.

Speaker 4

Yeah, I guess like I was into the assumption that we all just knew that you throw eggs at people, you don't like maybe it's a British thing.

Speaker 1

But I think it may just be that in the US because of the gun stuff, people are like a lot more hesitant to huck stuff just for fun, right, if you're throwing stuff and somebody it's serious.

Speaker 6

Although someone someone threw a beer at.

Speaker 5

Ted Cruz.

Speaker 1

Yeah, they sure did. That was good. That was good.

Speaker 6

Yeah.

Speaker 4

I think, you know, I actually had a lot of time to think about before my trial about why eggs and stuff, and I think they're just funny, you know, like there's a lot of egg puns that came out of it that that that you know, not to get too philosophical about it, but they're kind of you know they're they're really harmless, you know, but inherently humiliating as well.

Speaker 1

Yeah. Yeah, it's hard to argue attempted murder from an egg, but at the same time getting it.

Speaker 5

Yeah, well exactly.

Speaker 4

And I think there's there's something to be said for contrasting the violence of the state yea, with what's obviously like very low level violence. And yeah, I'm the one standing trial for it.

Speaker 1

Yeah, I mean it. It is like the language that got used by the state kind of in the proceedings against you was was amusing. Like I know that it was a pain in the ash you had to go through, but like the kind of the framing that they they put with it to make it seem like this was this was such a like serious offense against public order was was was quite funny. And I think it's beyond me to know what was going on in the now King's head at the time, but you got quite close.

You can see right after it hit there's goop on the ground directly in front of his foot, and his shoulders slump a little and he looks down, and I wonder if it made him feel bad. I hope it did, you know. I can't get inside the man's head. Maybe he's not capable of that, but I wonder.

Speaker 4

So, Yeah, I mean through five, and I will say it for the record that one of them did bounce off his arm, but he does have a force field, so it's not my fault that it didn't didn't get the full impact. But yeah, I honestly think he didn't have a clue what's going on. He's pretty pretty seen, how to be honest. Yeah, but you know, monarchists were like, so like, wow, look at how stoic he is.

Speaker 6

He just doesn't even care. He just shrugged it off.

Speaker 4

He's such a badass, and it's like he's just been guided through this series of bizarre public opinions where he's got to pretend that he you know, smiles and waves at normal people and he doesn't think that we're all plebs.

Speaker 1

But yeah, yeah, And it was the crowd reaction around you was pretty intense from what I understand. I mean, like people came after you when they realized what had happened.

Speaker 4

Yeah, and I think in some ways that spoke more more itself than like anything that I could have done. You know, the reaction to the video, you know, people immediately just start like pulling my hair out in chunks and just like screaming, like you know, like.

Speaker 6

Just killing him, like stick his head on a spike, kick him to death, you know.

Speaker 4

And it really I think maybe that kind of rhetoric is perhaps more like, you know that the overt violence is more prevalent in American politics. But yeah, you know, it exposed that you know, these people are essentially fascists, you know.

Speaker 6

And that they yeah, they're very, very violent people.

Speaker 1

And I think this is something people have are starting to recognize a little bit more about kind of politics in the UK. I mean, we're looking right now. The Public Order Act of twenty twenty three is kind of the most recent law that's gone through Parliament that effectively like expands the ability of the police to crack down

on protests. Some people will argue, and I think this seems, based on what I've read, pretty credible that it basically makes it possible for the police to arrest anyone for

almost any kind of activism. And that kind of was was exhibited during the coronation when a group of kind of of anti monarchist protesters who are more on the liberal side of things, and you're kind of approaching this as an anarchist, but a fairly large group of protesters with signs that were saying stuff like not my king,

attempted to rally doing so. I believe their their goal, from what I can tell, was to comply with the law as they understood it, and that did not protect them from the police.

Speaker 4

No. So you know, the context is in the wake of the police there was a police officer, you know, last year who murdered a woman, Sarah Everard. Yeah, and in the wake of that, they passed the Police, Courts, Sentencing and Crime Bill, and that that bill was really like, you know, the most over crackdown on protest.

Speaker 6

It banned.

Speaker 4

It allowed the police to arrest, the discretion of an officer, any protest that was deemed potentially annoying, like that's the specific language, is any any any action that could be loud or annoying. So, you know, there was a there was a lot of protests against that at the time.

That obviously came to nothing, and they passed the bill anyway, and then and then so the Public Order Bill just goes that step further by allowing them to preemptively arrest anyone who might be about to do something that's loud or annoying, and including this new thing called a serious Disruption Prevention Order, which is something that they can apply to someone who's considered an aggravated activist.

Speaker 1

He's saying, which is someone who has been arrested more than twice for protest related offenses.

Speaker 4

Essentially, it bans, you know, use of the internet to communicate about your ideas, basically stop you from attending protests in the first place.

Speaker 6

And a rest the train station.

Speaker 4

And yeah, we saw that in play with with the Republic, that this organization that had been extensively liaising with the police, and you know, it just seemed quite like Pikachu face when suddenly they were all just rounded up and yeah,

but for literally, you know, no pretext. It was they had they had like twelve thousand pounds worth of signs in a van and they were they were all wrapped up in yeah, just like rope rope, and the pretext for the arrest was that the rope was a lock on device that could be used to you know, I don't know, like jump in front of the procession and tie yourself with rope to the road.

Speaker 6

I really don't know.

Speaker 1

Like, yeah, from what I could tell just from the coverage I've read, if their protest had gone the way they planned it, it would have been like a show, a visible show that there were people who didn't like the monarchy, but it would not have caused it like they would not have this. These people were not planning to like burn down any public buildings or you know, smash car windows or stop a road. Not that I'm

specifically condemning that behavior, but I'm just stating this. This was not the state cracking down on people because they were afraid of a riot. This was the state cracking down on people because they didn't want the display of any kind of descent to exist.

Speaker 6

Yeah, and you know, that's where we're at in this country.

Speaker 4

And to be honest, the arrest of those organizers was the best thing that could have happened for the movement, because you know, what it really did was just shine a light that it was impossible to ignore and in some ways kind of over shadowed the coronation. Really was far more than any speech that Graham Smith you know, was planning to give, you know, just so overtly that

that there is no acceptable form of descent. Now, the very concept is so distasteful to Yeah, our aristocracy that it's banned.

Speaker 1

And I really appreciate your ability to kind of see the upside, the tactical upside in that, because I think it is true. I doubt I would have heard about that protest if it had gone as the organizer's plan, right, because it would have just been Yeah, there's some people who don't like the monarchy in the UK. That doesn't surprise me at all, but seeing it was like everywhere

all over my social media. I got sent it by multiple friends, by a family member because the state decided to go after these people, And I do think I think it's also from just a standpoint when you're talking about a struggle with as long odds as kind of struggling against the monarchy in the United Kingdom, which is you are talking about like the most entrenched power structure outside of the Vatican, right, Basically, Yeah, when you're talking about that, it is so important to be able to

look at moments like this and see the upside on them rather than just rather than just kind of feel the boot all the time. Otherwise you're not going to have the endurance to keep fighting.

Speaker 6

You know, for me with specifically with the eggs.

Speaker 4

I was I've been conscious the whole time that the backlash and the you know, disproportionate state reaction would speak more than my own actions. So, for example, one of the reasons why I think, you know, it went pretty viral when I when I threw the eggs in the first place, I was a bit surprised by by how it went kind of quite internationally. But but but you know, so the fact, so my bail conditions were between between my arrest and my trial were that I wasn't allowed

to carry eggs in public. Yeah, I know. And so that is in itself like so absurd that it's like, right.

Speaker 1

I gotta know, is there like a provision for if you're going home from the store or are you just are you just.

Speaker 4

So so So the copper who was literally just like making this up at the station says like, okay, so your bail condition is you're not allowed within five hundred meters of the king, you're not allowed to carry eggs in public. And then he goes like, oh, actually, like what was if he wants to buy some eggs And they're like okay, So they changed it so it's you're allowed to carry eggs as long as you're going home

from the shops and you've got the receipt. And I think that was a more viral than me actually doing it, you know what I mean, Like people were like, you know, that's that's that's Britain for you.

Speaker 6

Have you got a license for those eggs?

Speaker 1

You know, I'm imagining you like sliding down an alleyway with like a like a like a nineteen forty style shoulder holster, but with just like eggs under each year.

Speaker 4

Yeah and so and so you know when I so, so, I had my trial, you know, which was for yeah, threatening behavior that made someone fear imminent violence. In the wake of that, like I was convicted, I narrowly avoided six months in prison, which is the sentence that I thought I was gone, yeah, yeah, and so, so you know, in my trial, you know, I had the option to either downplay what I as being like, oh, it's not.

Speaker 6

Really violence, it's just an egg.

Speaker 4

But then of course, you know, legally it was you know, that could just councel as a soul. But then I chose it instead to say, okay, yeah, it was violence, but it was legitimate violence because it was necessary to resist the far greater violence of the British state, you know, citing the historic impact of colonialism.

Speaker 1

He's saying current foreign policy like the King personally negotiating weapons deals with Saudi Arabia.

Speaker 4

And then also you know, climate breakdown and the way in which by continuing to invest in fossil fuels global South like intentionally, and so therefore, you know, I was basically defending the right of you know, acting in defense of others with violence. I'm glad I did it, and I don't done much worse. So in the end, actually I got one hundred hours. I got one hundred hours of community service, which was extreme, you know, getting away with it essentially.

Speaker 1

So, yeah, did you get us? I wondered, was it just a situation? Did you just get lucky with a judge or like, because that's surprising. I'm surprised that like that that worked as well as it did in a positive way.

Speaker 6

I think, yeah, yeah, me too.

Speaker 2

Yeah.

Speaker 6

I mean I had a big bag.

Speaker 4

With me with all my light undies in because I thought I was going down, you know, And I think

there was partly, yes, getting lucky with the judge. Partly I think they were in a really difficult position and this is what I wanted to put them in essentially, which is that following all of that the money, you know, in the lead up to the coronation, there was a lot of negative press around around the king and the monarchy, and they had a choice between either sending me to prison and looking extremely authoritarian and blowing out proportion, or letting me get away with it. And you know, I

think they chose to minimize the negative press. You know, I mean, obviously, supposedly there's an independent judiciary and there would have been no conversations with the palace and the police about the charging procedures.

Speaker 6

But that's that's a lot of rubbish.

Speaker 4

But you know, yeah, and so but I think I wanted to put them in that difficult position because I knew that, like I said, their backlash would look worse than what I did. And so so when I chose to go to the coronation following following my conviction, you know, I had to tell my probation officer, look, I'm going to the coronation. I am going I'm going to peacefully protest.

I'm just going to be there. Deal with it, you know, And basically he told me that the counter Terrorism Department had was seeking an injunction from the courts to stop me attending, but then the court had ruled that no, I was allowed to attend. I'd already been given my punishment and he wasn't going to put any further conditions on me, not be allowing allowed to go.

Speaker 6

So so but I knew that if I.

Speaker 4

Went to the coronation they would arrest me anyway and it would make them look bad, you know. And then they they did. You know, I was as well as well as all of the organizers. I was there, you know, just not my king blah blah blah. And then and then and then I look up and there's a little watchtower that they had erected in the center of Trafalgarscoo, and I just saw that there was about seven police officers just all like staring at me and filming me

from you know, like two hundred meters away. And I was like, oh, okay, they're gonna arrest me now. So yeah, I gave my phone and well it's to my brother and then smile. And then within seconds, within seconds, they were just dragging me out, like you know, in handcuffs from the center of a of a crowd of about, you know, twenty thousand people, and I honestly couldn't have looked like more like overtly fascist if they tried, and and that was kind of the point, really is.

Speaker 1

Man? I uh, such a wild story, but I'm glad you did what you did. I'm impressed by the amount of thought that kind of went into the optics of it, because it's it's really the only way to turn an egg into an effective weapon, right is by very careful planning. I'm kind of curious where do you see what do you see the route forward for both not just kind of opposing the monarchy in your country, but sort of

opposing the overreach by the police. This is a problem in more places than the United Kingdom, but y'all are kind of on one of the cutting edges of sort of global attempts by law enforcement and its supporters in the state to effectively make dissent impossible ahead of what everyone knows is going to be kind of a heightening period of climate based activism.

Speaker 4

Yeah, and so with the climate activist movement in the UK, you know, we've seen extinction rebellion active since like twenty eighteen, and I've been you know, arrested multiple times with them at different actions.

Speaker 5

You know, the.

Speaker 4

Part of their strategy was that mass arrests, you know, blocking roads, nonviolent direct action and civil disobedience would force the government to take action. And I think really we're seeing that strategy like having run its course. And and and I think for a while now that's been evident that it wasn't working because they've just banned the types

of protests that we were doing. And also it was essentially quite naive to believe that, yeah, oh, you know, if we cause enough disruption, they're just going to put aside all of the you know, lobbying interests and their literal role in upholding capitalism to just go, oh, no, okay, fair enough that they're blocked and roads, we are going to like radically transform society to deal with climate breakdown.

Speaker 6

That was never going to work, you know, realistically. And so so.

Speaker 4

Even though you know, we've seen every time they passed these these new legislation, there are there's a there's a backlash, there's some marches, there's some protests that fizzle out, and the state just keep consolidating more and more power, and people keep getting more and more dis illusioned with.

Speaker 1

He says, with what an effective strategy of resistance looks like. And so for me personally, it's something I've been thinking about for a while.

Speaker 4

Now but recently have is that, you know, we have to stop asking politicians through direct democracy at the local level and essentially you know, using like democratic confederalism, you know, as they're doing Rajava, to to look.

Speaker 6

At creating a national.

Speaker 4

Network of people's assemblies that builds dual power outside of the state.

Speaker 6

Because because, because I think a lot of the problem with.

Speaker 4

These direct action movements is that they don't have the legitimacy of a democratic mandate, so that even whilst the tactics might be like in some way effective, you know, Extinction Rebellion has always said our message is to say that climate change is a serious threat, but we cannot propose the solutions because we don't have a democratic mandate.

But the way to you know, work around that is to build a democratic mandate through holding people's assemblies, creating forums where people can create their own vision, and then direct action can then be used in service of those aims rather than putting the cart before the horse, if that makes sense.

Speaker 1

No, yeah, I think that that's certainly like one of the more pragmatic ways forward that I think I've seen.

You know, we're we're we're always talking about an uphill battle here, and I think kind of the inherent difficulty of fixing any of these bigger problems, particularly fixing the and what we mean is dismantling the systems that are causing climate destruction, like that is such a lopsided battle that I think whenever, whenever you have you present an option to people, because it sounds hard, there's this there's this tendency to just be like, well, you know, we

have to go by the thing that we know, which is just kind of like trying to vote in better people. If we can take a lesson out of the last thirty years, it's that the standard electoral methods cannot provide the solution to climate change, like they simply aren't going to do it. And I think the police in a lot of kind I mean in the United States right here in one of my old hometown's, Austin, Texas, they just voted on a police accountability bill that the police

have basically said we're not going to abide by. Like this is and you can find stories like that all over the United States and other parts of the world, Like the kind of the hope that you can just sort of like put in your however long it takes you to do voting in your country or city or whatever, and that that's the method forward. It's it seems more realistic because it's more familiar. But I think the vision you're putting forward, not to say that it's as simple

that simple, but like it's effortful. And I think that whenever someone's positing something like that that requires that kind of like effort from a large enough segment of the population, I see that as inherently more realistic than hoping that we can just all kind of keep putting our twenty minutes of voting a year towards solving the problem and expect it to get better.

Speaker 4

Yeah, And it's like one of those things with you know, like the idea that imagining prison abolition, you have to imagine a world where that's possible, and that requires changing everything, right, And I think that applies to tackling climate change and implementing direct democracy. So you know, if you're talking about a system where people can turn it to a forum in a local community center, or you know, church or

whatever once a week. Then people say, well that's not going to be accessible, you know, because so it's like, well, you're right, we'll probably have to set up a system of mutual aid that supports you know, working class people to be able to attend those kind of events.

Speaker 6

And you know, yeah, it's like, how are you going to pay for it?

Speaker 4

And it's like, well, you're right, we're probably going to have to, you know, set up a solidarity economy where you know, if we decide, for example, that we want free public transport then and and bus drivers to be paid paid a fair wage, you know, then you're going to have to look at a whole system whereby people are potentially getting free housing in return for being a bus driver, free food that comes from the local food cooperative.

And you're like, I say, building dual power rather than attacking the system head on, because in a battle, in a pitch street battle in this country, at least between us and the police, we're going to lose. And I think that, you know, we need to think smarter because at this point they haven't yet made organizing public meetings illegal, but you know they probably will at some point.

Speaker 6

And then it's.

Speaker 4

The only way we'll be able to resist that is if we've had some public meetings to decide how we're going to do it, because at the moment, we haven't even had the meeting to decide what our collective strategies because there is so much atomization between between these different like you know, left wing social movements and civil society

organizations and so much. Sometimes at heart just depresses me to think about how many people are working for environmental charities or whatever, where all of their work and their research is going towards creating policy proposals for politicians to ignore.

It's like if you were putting that amount of energy and your enthusiasm in service of the vision that's been created democratically by the people, then we don't need to petition anyone to make the changes we need because we'll have organized effectively enough to do the things that will really challenge state power, for example, like a mass rent strike and a general strike.

Speaker 1

Or if those efforts that are currently going towards putting policy papers on desks where there'll be ignored or neutered, was going towards putting forth policy that is then being backed by a movement that is carrying out rent strikes, that is putting out together work stoppages, that is blocking roads, that's able to actually throttle some of the life support

system of the state. Well, then suddenly you're not looking at a recommendation a white paper that's going to wind up on some bloodless bureaucrats desk, or that that's going to wind up getting cut to pieces in Parliament. You have something that has teeth behind it, right, the kind of force that might be able to make change. I don't know. Again, when you talk about this kind of stuff, you have to contrast it with what we've been trying so far, which is nothing.

Speaker 4

Yeah, and you know, diversity of tactics is huge, and so you know a lot of these dark action groups in the UK, like just Stop Oil that have been blocking motorways and stuff, have received like you know, huge criticism, especially from people who you know, really ought to be allies and at least recognize the the that this action is coming out of a place of desperation because people

cannot see a better way. Yeah, and you know there was a there's someone from just Stop Oil who just got three years in prison for blocking a motorway and and that's that's insane, you know, and you know on some level that person is it is a martyr, and you've got to hold your take your hat off, and say what that has done is shine a spotlight again on state authority in a way that you know, if they have these laws on the books, but they never have to use them, then it's easy to forget that

they exist and have that power.

Speaker 1

Do you want to talk a little bit about cooperation?

Speaker 8

U K.

Speaker 4

Yeah, yeah, So so you know, for me, I'm I'm a democratic confederalist, you know, I mean or like you know, the Rajarvant project using direct markcracy, but also confederating that up to sort of replace the state with a form of governance that's democratic. And you know, I also I'm a big believer in cosmocracy, right, which is the proper name for global democracy.

Speaker 1

He says, essentially, you know, I wrote about this while I was doing my masters.

Speaker 4

And that is how potentially, if we were implementing this system world, we can use the internet to confederate to a global level, you know, and really start to tackle the issues that we collectively face as humanity, which is like the fact that our separation from nature and the rise of fascism, is is threatening angers with extinction, and so yeah, I'm a citizen of Earth and.

Speaker 6

You know that's what motivates a lot of my actions.

Speaker 4

But you know, in some ways I've been kind of stewing on these ideas alone, and so recently I met a group called Cooperation UK, who are you know, connecting. I can often get bogged down in abstract theory about like how you know, changing the whole world and never actually doing anything practical.

Speaker 6

That's my downfall.

Speaker 4

But you know, you need to start a movement like that locally, and and so they're copying Cooperation Jackson, you know, who have been incredibly effective, you know, setting up people's assemblies, mutual aid economy in Jackson and also like a community land trust.

Speaker 6

You know, they own.

Speaker 4

Like like fifty different buildings, you know, that are used collectively by the community. And this group are planning to set that up in Hull, which is just a city in the Northeast that's incredibly deprived. It's got like the lowest voter turnout in the UK, but it also has a thriving network of food banks and you know cooperatives and mutual aid groups.

Speaker 6

And I think the next step for me is when those those groups send delegates to me, eat together and decide on collective strategy, right, like, because there are so many people doing so much good work, but there's almost like no faith in our own vision, which is that if we're the people you know who are say a union for nurses, then you know, we should be deciding the conditions that exist in healthcare, you know, because who better besides patients and like staff is that to decide

the conditions that they that they operate in.

Speaker 4

And and so yeah, cooperation UK there there are there's a group of us that are moving to Whull.

Speaker 6

I'm moving.

Speaker 4

I'm moving next week. I'm really excited about it. And yeah, we're planning to set up lots of local neighborhood assemblies with the intention of within a year holding a citywide people's assembly that can create a shared vision and then and then potentially you know, standing candidates for local council but whose only policy is we will enact.

Speaker 6

We will give.

Speaker 4

Power to the people's assemblies and then they can use the you know, financial power of existing institutions to support the transition to a new model.

Speaker 6

And whilst they're doing that in Hull, you know.

Speaker 4

The work that I hope to be doing is document in that process the learning, you know, so people can learn from the mistakes and that, you know, and hopefully we can set them up in every city well across the UK, because there are already people who think very similarly and that we're at a time now where that's coalescing into the you know, people are recognizing the need for this new movement with a new strategy that's based around democracy rather than just activism.

Speaker 6

And yeah, it's really exciting.

Speaker 1

Yeah, I mean, that's I think that's a worthwhile idea. I think it's it's it's bold and something that I'm I'm glad to see being attempted. Well, it's been really great talking with you today. Did you have anywhere you wanted to direct listeners in order to help if they're interested in what Cooperation UK is doing.

Speaker 6

Yeah, definitely.

Speaker 4

So there's there's a crowdfunder that I think there'll be.

Speaker 6

I believe there'll be a link that you guys can act.

Speaker 1

He says, and we'll be using that money to set up the People's Assembly and mutual aid networks, but also to create resources that anyone anywhere can use in their local community.

Speaker 4

And I hope is that, you know, as these groups proliferate, you know, we're going to start reaching out to each other, forming an international solidarity network that is capable of providing like the mutual aid that we that we need to support each other, you know, for example, you know, if we're talking about Palestine or Iran, to provide real, meaningful solidarities, you know, liberation groups will require more organization than just like thoughts and prayers.

Speaker 1

Really and yeah, yeah, well, thank you so much, Patrick, It has been great talking with you. Good luck as you continue moving forward.

Speaker 7

And yeah, yeah, thanks very much.

Speaker 4

Yeah, I guess I should also say I'm on I'm bizarrely, I'm on TikTok.

Speaker 6

That's the medium I'm using at the moment. I wish it wasn't.

Speaker 4

I'll probably want to start making more YouTube videos discussing these ideas, so maybe I'll send you a link that you can put in them.

Speaker 6

This isn't a both show. It's my YouTube channel.

Speaker 1

Excellent well Patrick tellwell Citizen of Earth YouTube channel and we'll have your TikTok and the description. Thanks again for coming on the show. Everybody go out and you know, acquire eggs. Hey, We'll be back Monday, with more episodes every week from now until the heat death of the Universe.

Speaker 5

It Could Happen Here as a production of cool Zone Media.

Speaker 4

For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool zonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can find sources for It Could Happen Here, updated monthly at coolzonemedia dot com slash sources.

Speaker 5

Thanks for listening.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file