It Could Happen Here Weekly 117 - podcast episode cover

It Could Happen Here Weekly 117

Feb 10, 20244 hr 55 min
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:

Episode description

All of this week's episodes of It Could Happen Here put together in one large file.

You can now listen to all Cool Zone Media shows, 100% ad-free through the Cooler Zone Media subscription, available exclusively on Apple Podcasts. So, open your Apple Podcasts app, search for “Cooler Zone Media” and subscribe today!

http://apple.co/coolerzone

 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

Also media.

Speaker 2

Hey everybody, Robert Evans here, and I wanted to let you know this is a compilation episode. So every episode of the week that just happened is here in one convenient and with somewhat less ads package for you to listen to in a long stretch if you want. If you've been listening to the episodes every day this week, there's got to be nothing new here for you, but you can make your own decisions.

Speaker 3

Welcome, Dick. It appen here at the podcast that we're starting as if it was a NOL podcast instead of doing some terrible thing like we normally do. I'm your host, Bia Wong. This is a podcast about things falling apart, and this is a putting it back together again episode. Yeah, and I'm I'm here with two workers from Donut Workers United, specifically at Loostar Donuts, Lydia and Ben, to talk about

unionization efforts and some really terrible union busting stuff. So, Lydia, Ben, welcome to the show.

Speaker 4

Thank you, thank you for having us. Super excited.

Speaker 3

Yeah yeah, I'm really excited to have you two here. So all right, So Blue Star Donuts is a donut place in Portland's for people who are not in Portland's question work, which is probably a lot of you. I don't know, I don't know where you are right now. So I guess the place I wanted to start with talking about this is how how did you two get involved with this campaign?

Speaker 5

You know, it's actually for me, it was right before Halloween. I went to a coworker's house and you know, we had some drinks and hung out and she just sort of, you know, the conversation just sort of organically led to work and talking about work and you know, this is messed up at work, this is frustrating us. And then she was like, hey, like, what's your opinion on you know, union stuff? And I actually had when I worked at Starbucks in Texas, I had tried to unionize my location and it didn't.

Speaker 6

No one was interested, but I you know, they she.

Speaker 5

Asked us if we wanted to sign a union card or union authorization card, and I was all for it. You know, I'm very into it. So that's that's how it started for me.

Speaker 4

Yeah, So bouncing off of that, it was I would say a couple of days before that Halloween party. For me, I'm pretty close friends with the woman who started all of this, and so I was visiting her and she just kind of briefly mentioned She's like, hey, do you know what's going on with Blue Star? And kind of open ended question, and you know this company almost every day something happens, so I was like, I mean, maybe maybe not what's going on? And she's like, well, like

are you good with unions? And I'm like, oh, girl, of course i am. I was actually involved with a union and a previous job that was more higher end, like government board specific instead of an individual and I was like, yeah, it hit me what's going on. And she's like, okay, cool, we have a couple of people interested trying to unionize Blue Star. And I was like, oh,

sign me up, Like let's do this thing. And then at that Halleen party when we were all kind of gathered there, we briefly talked about it and how messed up things were, swalk stories and it just kind of click that leads to my brain of like okay, yeah, let's do this. So that was that was my end.

Speaker 3

Yeah, it seems like it was a really a pretty quick campaign. I know you all had an election. Oh how many weeks ago?

Speaker 7

Was that?

Speaker 6

Likes ago? Yeah?

Speaker 3

I guess it'll be like three when this goes out. Yeah, so that that's that's a very very quick campaign. How many people like ish are are at the shop.

Speaker 5

It depends on if you're adding like all the satellites and versus like the regular Flagship store. I think we have thirty something at Flagship, which is the location on Jefferson, and then I think there's maybe fifty one employees total.

Speaker 4

Yeah, we're pretty scapared around all of Portland with one shop in Lake Oswego, but majority of us are in headquarters at Flagship.

Speaker 7

Yeah.

Speaker 3

That's something I think is pretty interesting about this campaign and about a lot of the independent campaigns, is that, yeah, it's shops are it's shops that are pretty small shops that are split around, and it shops that, like you know it shops with high turnover. Now I was wondering, well, actually, I don't know. I'm assuming you get SiGe turned over because.

Speaker 4

There is a lot of turnover in the satellite shops for sure.

Speaker 5

I mean I would even say that there was a fair amount of turnover at Flagship. You know, we had a time where in our kitchen, which is the wholesale kitchen, which makes the donut bites. We referred to it as Red Kitchen. We had four people quit in four days.

Speaker 3

Jesus ghost.

Speaker 5

They didn't Yeah, they didn't replace those people. They expected us to continue working the producing the same amount with four less people. Yeah, but there were you know, a lot of like poached wororker like temporary workers that were coming and going while I was there.

Speaker 6

And yeah, some pretty serious turnover.

Speaker 4

That kind of happened with me last year. I was working at Blue Star for like about eight months. Oh it's the new year, I guess two years ago.

Speaker 3

And then I quit.

Speaker 4

I left, and then unfortunately last year I hit a little unemployment zone and I'm like I need a job. So I came back to Blue Star for about three months and this is when everything was going on. But long story short, Sorry, last time I was there, we kind of had a little bit of turnover as well. A lot of people were not great, and we had

a lot of meetings and got some people fired. Granted, like Ben was saying, is that no one replaced them, and so it's very much of like we have to cover them and a lot more quantity.

Speaker 3

Yeah, so has the sort of speed ups from that was that one of the main things that was driving the unionization or like what other kinds of things were like driving people into this.

Speaker 6

There were a few things, a few main things.

Speaker 5

Pay and inconsistency of pay was a real big issue. For instance, there was a person in our kitchen who me and her started around the same time. We had very similar previous experience. Neither of us were cross trained. We did the same exact job. She was making three dollars an hour more.

Speaker 6

Than I was.

Speaker 5

And so that kind of thing happens a lot at Blue Star. And there's one of the biggest things for me, honestly, was the point system, what they call the point system the disciplinary system at Blue Star. Basically, you get a certain amount of points that you're allowed to hit.

Speaker 6

If you go over that.

Speaker 5

Amount of points, you're done, you're fired, and you can get you know, I don't remember the numbers exactly, but it's like one point for calling out of a shift, half a point for being ten minutes late. See, there's all these things that you can earn. Yeah, there's all these things that you can earn points for. And it you know, if you reach that number eight, it doesn't really matter how good of an employee you are you're fired.

Speaker 4

Yeah. And on top of that, with the point system, it's incredibly unfair because you get points due to things you can't like the thing.

Speaker 6

It's very able.

Speaker 4

Yeah, And the main issue was traffic and crashes. If like a car crash happens and you're stuck in that you and you're like late to work because of it, even when you like let your managers know and let your team know, you still get punished for it and you get points and that counts to the eight point total. So that was a main part of the point system that really really had us upset and very unfair, honestly.

Speaker 6

Well, and it's it's very it's a very abless system.

Speaker 5

I mean there were multiple people in our kitchen alone that had chronic illness issues, myself included. And I there were two nights when in the three ish months that I was working there, two days where I had not slept it all the night before and I was literally not seeing straight, like I was seeing double. I couldn't walk in a straight line like, I was not okay.

And you know, there's some heavy machinery and like some really hot oil in the kitchen and I was like, I really don't think I'm safe to come to work. And they're like, that's fine, you know, stay home, get some rest. But you are getting a point what Yeah, so you know, a very ablest system.

Speaker 4

Yeah, and going off of that as well, the whole thick time and PTO was a mess. And when we get like paid time off, it won't even cover a whole shift. We'll be lucky to get four hours.

Speaker 3

Yeah.

Speaker 4

No, it's it's insane really and so I'll never forget. Like just recently, our special Christmas prize thing, our grand prize on the twelfth day was two hours PTO.

Speaker 6

Two hours ye, congratulations ye.

Speaker 4

And sick time too, yeah, they were super problems. Are like we were so hard for this, you deserve this, blah blah blah. And with sick time, it like will

barely cover a day. And on top of that, if you're like sincerely sick, I got bronchitis on my birthday and I had to leave work for like a week, And around the like second or third day, my manager is like, okay, well for you to be excused properly, you have to go back and get a doctor's note from them, and to prove that you are not able to come into work and you know, I could ramble on like they they don't handle COVID. Well, they're like, if you can stand up, you can slap on a

mask and come into work. And COVID specifically spread so quickly there because people were so scared aired of not coming to work that they would get punished and get points. This than the other that sick people will come into work and get other people sick. It happened, yeah, all the time.

Speaker 5

I mean I can think of specifically. We had a coworker who, you know, kind of young. This was you know, she was kind of getting her feet wet in the working world, and she had had some issues with illness and she came to work with strep throat. Yeah, because she was so afraid of getting I mean she literally was like in tears, like having a breakdown to the managers because she was like, I can't get fired, Like I need to keep this job and I'm afraid that if I don't come in, I'm going to get fired.

And that's the kind of culture they create there with that disciplinary system.

Speaker 4

Yeah, it's it's really rough because majority of these workers rely on this job, like this job is their income and they can't really do anything else, and it's so incredibly toxic there where they're just so afraid to not come into work because they will be punished over it.

Speaker 3

It kind of goes without saying, which means you should say it, which is like it is unbelievably discussing to literally put people's lives in danger because you don't want to let someone take like a few days off because they have fucking stripped. Like that's unbelievable.

Speaker 4

Yeah, over like peace and love to Blue Star, but over donuts like donut bite.

Speaker 6

Yeah, like yeah, well.

Speaker 8

Like like I don't, I don't, I don't think.

Speaker 3

I don't think it's okay to make like nurses go in when they're sick, but like donuts, like this is oh my god.

Speaker 5

Like you know, as you know, who cares if we're suffering as long as they make their bottom line?

Speaker 7

You know.

Speaker 3

Yeah, it's really one of those things. It's like, yes, like they will survive if slightly less donuts are produced, Like they will be fine. However, Comma all over here are getting terribly sick because of all the shit that is that is terrible.

Speaker 4

Yeah, no, like I laugh all the time about it, and I you know, my roommate and I are like best friends. I come home almost every day from those shifts being like you'll never guess what happened over like the most craziest, hilarious things, and like I can't believe this is real, Like I'm experiencing this.

Speaker 3

Yeah, and we're we're going to talk more about the absolutely wild stuff that happened here. Unfortunately, after we come back from this ad break that pays some of the bills question.

Speaker 1

Mark, we are back.

Speaker 3

So yeah, I wanted to ask about some of the other stuff that's been happening at this shop because everything that I've ever heard about is just like, I don't know, just deeply weird. And it's well, I guess, I guess one place we can sort of start. It's like it seems like it's one of these places where they, I don't know, it has this very sort of like progressive eveneer around it, and then when it comes time to like you know, like like even sort of live up

to those ideals, you just get this. Everyone's forced to come home with COVID.

Speaker 5

Yeah, and it's it's so funny because you walk in and you know there's there's pride flags there, you know, all all of the workers are you know, queer and cool and progressive, and you know they're supporting the Shortland Teachers' Union.

Speaker 6

And yet you know, and this story is just disgusting.

Speaker 5

We had a worker in our kitchen, actually in Lydia, in an I's kitchen, who sexually assaulted two of our coworkers.

Speaker 3

Jesus Christ.

Speaker 5

Yes, these women brought it forward to management. Management victim blamed. They thanked them for keeping it quiet and not letting it interfere with their work. Yeah, it was not handled well. That was specifically the manager of Red Kitchen, Brittany Bergner. A lot of just really like callous and inappropriate mishandling of that situation. Yeah, and it was really disgusting.

Speaker 4

Yeah, it was disgusting. And I was so so grateful that I wasn't there when this happened, because I would literally tour this man apart. But the thing with that manager is that him and her got all really well. And what I've heard I wasn't there. I heard that there was some favoritism towards him, and so when these allegations came up, that's when she got She mishandled it a lot, and it was not dealt with properly at all, and it seemed very much swept under rug kind of

very much. So, yeah, he did.

Speaker 6

Nobody talked about it.

Speaker 4

Yeah, he did get fired eventually, but eventually that's the main thing. Yeah, it was handled right away.

Speaker 5

And the you know, the effect it had on these women that came forward that this happened to. I mean I I hung out with them outside of work where they would talk about, you know, what happened and how it was handled, and like, you know, they were sobbing. They were you know, their lives were torn apart over this.

I mean, it's a very serious thing, as you know, we all know, to be sexual assaulted and then you know, to have it treated this way by someone who's in a position of authority over you, it's you know, I can't help but keep using that word disgusting. It's just it's inhumane and honestly, like that's Bluestar.

Speaker 4

Yeah, especially by a company that reaches how open and awesome and close family we are, and then behind the scenes they're actually mistreating their workers literally every single day. So it's it is, it is disgusting. I have no other word to describe it.

Speaker 3

Yeah, I mean, that's like someone's sexually assaulting you, and then them not being fired means you can fucking run into them at your job, which is like the fucking just absolute nightmare shit. That is like the worst fucking shit that can happen.

Speaker 6

And we all worked in the same kitchen.

Speaker 5

We all worked in the same kitchen, so we were guaranteed to see each other for most of the day every day. And it's like, you know, you expect these women to go to work and stare at this guy and and you know, talk and laugh with this guy who assaulted them, Like that's crazy.

Speaker 3

Yeah, that's absolutely fucking terrible. And I hope, I hope, like I hope fucking like some shit happens to these people, because like God.

Speaker 4

Oh yeah, don't worry. We got him banned from some bars because classic thing is drugging drinks.

Speaker 3

Christ.

Speaker 4

So we've spread the word and got flyers, and I'm pretty sure he's banned I know for sure too bars, but I think others as well, I'm not sure.

Speaker 3

Yeah.

Speaker 4

Yeah, don't get me wrong. I will definitely go out of my way to destroy a man's life.

Speaker 3

Yeah, And so I guess, like you know, with with just like the absolute fucking horrifying shake going on, and also with YouTube, like you know, people doing organizing outside of the workplace to go after these people. It may it makes it makes a lot of sense that, you know, the unionization campaign has been going, and I wanted to ask, I want to well, I guess I wanted to talk about sort of the vote and the stuff leading up to the vote and the things that happened to YouTube, because oh my god.

Speaker 5

Yep, yeah, you know, we we had our vote on January seventeenth. There were seven votes that were left unopened that were challenged by Blue Star management. Three of them because the employees were no longer active employees, and four of them for honestly just like completely bullshit reasons, like they had to get a new envelope.

Speaker 6

You know, they they were there before the vote, but.

Speaker 5

Like seven minutes after the cutoff that you know that Blue Star wanted one person had to get a new ballot, and you know, it's like, these are these are technicalities that really should not prevent someone from having their vote counted. And so we as DW Star, objected to six of those challenges. The four that were very ticky tacky for obvious reasons, and that was the week end.

Speaker 6

That was the week of the big snow snowstorm as well.

Speaker 3

We should talk for people who weren't in Portland for this. Okay, so the city of Portland, this is the thing I have heard. I am a Chicagoan, so like I grew up in snowstorms, right, but the city of Portland, like this is I get, this is this is this is this is the this is the the Mia rants about the city of Portland for about five minutes thing because oh my fucking god, the city of Portland does not actually substantively do any kind of like street clearing. They

don't do salt, they don't really. I think they might have like two snowplows. And this means that, you know, when it, for example, snows, and then the temperature goes back up, goes freezing, and it goes back down below freezing, the entire city is covered in a sheet of ice. And this lasts for days and days and days and days. It is terrible. I came into Portland's like in the middle of this, like you you walk three steps and you're just going flying on this ice. It is terrible.

It is dangerous to drive it is dangerous to walk, it is it is dangerous to school on your butt, like terrible. I don't know, Like if you did this in Chicago, if the city of Chicago failed to clear the streets sufficiently that this was happening, the government would be would fucking collapse in a week. Portlander's you deserve better.

Speaker 4

I personally would have preferred snow, like six feet of snow over a half in ice, the ice over nane. The whole entire city shuts down, and it's it is incredibly dangerous, for sure, and the city does not prepare for it. The city, like landscape itself is not prepared for it. And yeah, it's awful. I tripped and fell like three times within a week, and my room and I were literally locked into our house for days, like

four maybe five days. We could not leave. And on top of that, we had to turn our water off, like it was a whole night.

Speaker 3

There so many, so many people lost power, so many people's.

Speaker 4

Like yeah, growth and the NLRB building itself was shut down for I don't remember how long, but it was shut down, and.

Speaker 3

So it was.

Speaker 5

It was shut down for most of that week leading up to the vote. Our vote was on a Thursday, and I think Thursday was the first day that the actual office was open. There might have been some people there on Wednesday, but the office itself was closed the you know, Monday was Martin Luther King Junior Day, so

that it was close closed. But you know, I tried to take you know, I in my little hatchback with two two wheel drive hatchbag, tried to drive across Portland to take people to the office to turn in their their ballots and because we were doing a mail in ballot, but some people had left it at the last minute, you know, as human beings do. And we we get you know, we drive across this ice and snow. We

get to the NLRB office. There's security guards in the lobby and they say, well, you can't go up there as closed. I'm like, okay, uh, what about tomorrow. They're like, we don't know, we'll be here, but we can't guarantee that, you know, the nler B office will be here.

Speaker 6

Yeah, And so I.

Speaker 5

Call up our rep at the NLRB, Michael Moles, and I say, hey, like, what's the deal. When can we drop these off? And he goes, well, actually, you know you can drop them off. When we're not there. You can slide them under the door, you know, as long as it's the person, you know, as long as the person whose ballot is being turned in is turning in the ballot, like, you can't send someone else to do it for you. So we go back up on Wednesday

and get some turned in. And you know, at this point, the people who wanted to turn in on Tuesday, they've got you know, they've got work, they've got other things going on. They have to find a time to get in. So we're going like Thursday morning, Thursday afternoon, right before the vote. And that's why all of these votes were you know, missing things or you know a little bit late. Is because the whole city was shut down for half a week, almost a week, and things got you know, mess up.

Speaker 3

Yeah, Like the fact that the City of Portland doesn't does not like refuses to buy snowplows and doesn't know that you can use beat juice as an anti ice thing. Like the fact that the fact the fact that the fact that the city leadership is utterly incompetent, like should not should not be a reason why your union vote doesn't your votes don't get counted. That is absolutely absurd. It's also like, you know, I mean, like okay, like

I get like the responsible thing to do. Dream this storm was to close and a lot of places were fucking open, and that is a disaster. But the fact that the LRB is closed and all before workers are still happy to go to work is like, just oh god.

Speaker 6

Well.

Speaker 5

And I I emailed or I called Michael Moles again, our rep at the NLRB, and I was like, hey, like, this is kind of unprecedented, like can we push the vote out like a week just to make sure that everyone can safely get their ballots in? And he told me, in no uncertain terms that we would not be doing that. He gave me this, you know, long speech about how hard it is, how difficult it is, how you know,

we have to get all these permissions. And you know, I'm fairly new to all the legal avenues and legal parts of union and stuff, and so I didn't really have a counter argument. So I was just like, you know, throw my hands up, Okay, whatever, we'll do our best.

Speaker 3

Well.

Speaker 4

At the time, people are literally risking their lives. Yeah, and to drive cars, they're risking their cars. They're risking their lives trying to get these votes in. So that's why this appeal to these challenges are so important that it's not fair if we don't count in ice storm and the actual you have to.

Speaker 6

Account for that.

Speaker 4

Yeah, So like all these things matter and should count, and that's why we're really pushing that these votes be counted well.

Speaker 5

In two of the votes where people who had quit, and one of those was was Lydia, and she was straight up intimidated into quitting.

Speaker 6

And you can Lydia if you want to talk about it.

Speaker 4

Oh my gosh. Okay, So they I use this word pretty loosely, but the more I talk about the more it's true. They forced me to quit, point blank. Period. They pulled me into this meeting where at Blue Store they have these every thirty day check ins and meetings to talk about like how you're doing and how's the work, et cetera. So on our ninety day check in, we are promised a raise after working here for ninety days, but first we have to go through a whole meeting,

and this whole like spectrum one through five. They rate you on different topics. So I come in and not only as my manager there, but hr and our head chef is there, and last time I did a ninety day that didn't happen, it was just my manager. So immediately I'm like, what is going on? This is weird. And we went through the normal stuff until chef interrupted and brought up my schedule. So at the time, I

was working two jobs, Blue Star and another bakery. And before any of this, I checked in with my managers and chef to make sure that this was possible and okay to put me from full time to part time at Blue Star. And there they were thrilled. They were like, oh, that's so great for you. Congratulations. Yes, we can totally work with you. This is not a problem at all.

I'm like, okay, great, awesome. And so they brought up my schedule and they're like, so we're gonna change some things with Red Kitchen and we're going to change production times and we're gonna bump everything up a couple hours. Totally fine, Okay, I get it. And I said I'm like, okay, well, you know I work until one pm, so you know

I'm not available to be here until like two. And apparently that was an issue because my schedule, my availability is no longer working for them, which doesn't make sense because a closing shift still exists. And I'm I told them, I'm like, you can use me. I am part time, you can use me for like four hours closing, Like I am okay with that, and they shut me down.

Chef kind of clicked her teeth and was like, you know, that's not really worth it for us, and what are you doing over the holidays because this is right before our Christmas break and I I was kind of confused. I was like, oh, nothing, I'm just at home. And she's like, okay, well you should really take this time to think about your future here with us, and like kind of me like stared at me, and I'm like what, Like,

I what do you mean? And she's like, you know, we're changing some things around here and we don't want to get rid of you, we don't want to fire you, but you should really think about your future here and really leaned in and emphasized that and kind of like everyone was kind of like looking at me as if like, hey, we want you to quit, but we're not allowed to like say anything like that. And I asked my manager. I was like, it kind of sounds like you're not

giving me any options here? What am I supposed to just leave? And they looked at each other and they look back at me. You're like, you know, we can't really say one thing or the other, so you know, we need your decision by the first and I'm like what I It was very it was very tense. It was very weird and awkward, and I was very confused because I never thought my job was on the line, never thought it was gonna be jeopardized. And I kept offering them different options. I was like, put me in

front of house. You know, last year I was trained. I was actually supposed to be a manager in our other kitchen, but they kind of screwed me over on that. That's a whole different story. Like I know how to handle purple kitchen. Put me there, like I'm okay going from one job immediately into here to save time. And with every single option I was giving them, they shut me down and would not work with me at all.

And then on top of that, they extended my ninety day period and from doing that, I was no longer allowed to get a raise. And yeah, like you have to finish ninety days and you get a raise, And I'm like period. That's the policy. Everybody knows that. But because my ninety days was extended like probation period, I was no longer allowed to get a raise.

Speaker 5

And what's funny is they extended my ninety days as well. I can talk about that more later, but this is it's just it's just odd because Red Kitchen, our kitchen, which at that point was made up of I think six people, all vocal union supporters, wore buttons every day.

Speaker 4

Yep, we were the most vocal people about it. We wore our union buttons every day. We like everybody knows that we were firm believers standing up for this union. And that kind of segues into the furlough situation where they all shut down our kitchen. They our whole entire team are six people of vocal union supporters suddenly no job.

Speaker 9

It's incredibly messed up. And we're going to come back from more unbelievably messed up stuff after this ad break, and we're back going.

Speaker 6

Back to the votes that were challenged.

Speaker 5

The other person who quit was one of the main organized She was her and one other person. Where the people who kicked off all of the organizing at Blue Star and basically she they changed around her schedule so much to kind of force her into quitting. She was very stressed with school and like just the way that they kept messing with her made her quit. Basically, she was afraid that she was going to be fired, so she went ahead and quit. And so that that was

that other challenged vote. But yeah, the furlough situation is wild. And I also got my probation extended. I actually filed a unfairlyabor practice because of that, Because the reason they gave me for extending my probation was that I was bringing their words on paper, bringing the vibe down by complaining about working conditions. Bringing the vibe down by complaining about working conditions, and.

Speaker 4

This is how ridiculous this company is. Third reasons where I'm like, this must be the Truman Show, Like this is not real. Where are the cameras well?

Speaker 5

And first of all, complaining about working conditions is a federally protected act. I can do that and I cannot be punished for that. It is against the law, which is why I filed the ULP. Second of all, the reason I was complaining is because they had taken us down from three to four people opening shifts to two and the way two people work, Yeah, the way two people operates for opening shift in Red Kitchen is one person is mixing the dough and loading it into the fryer,

and that is a constant thing. Like you you mix batches for like four hours like on like back to back to back to back to back, and the other person has to stand at the end of the conveyor belt and take the glazed bites off of the conveyor belt and put them onto trays. This is a non stop job. You cannot even walk away for a few seconds.

Speaker 6

And when you know.

Speaker 5

Typically, like the best practice that was done the entire time I was there up to this was that you did not do that position for more than an hour because it was physically difficult to stand in one place like that and do that and do those repetitive motions.

Speaker 6

And two, it's like fucking.

Speaker 5

Psychological torture because you're in the corner of this room. You're not speaking to anybody. You're literally just staring at your own hands. I mean, it's it's not like nobody likes to they call it catching. Nobody likes to catch. And I was doing this for up to three hours a day, uninterrupted and I have sciatic nerve issues with my leg and I you know, I made them aware of this multiple multiple times. I cannot catch for more than an hour at a time, and you know what I was doing catching.

Speaker 6

For three hours every day.

Speaker 3

So they're just trying to injury.

Speaker 6

So that's what I was, yes, and that's what I was complaining about. I was saying, I'm in pain.

Speaker 5

I'm literally having to go on muscle relaxers every single day because of the effect that this is having on me physically, Like I I can't sleep at night because my leg is so tense and it's in so much pain from fucking catching these donuts and putting them on trays.

Speaker 6

It's insane.

Speaker 5

And so you know, they're yet they're penalizing me for having the gall to voice the fact that what they're doing is literally ruining my quality of life.

Speaker 4

Really and going off that every single issue we bring up to management, they have the tone of like, well, that sucks, that's a bummer, deal with it, and literally, yeah, literally just like okay, and we're like, okay, fix it, because we are human beings with nerves and bones and we cannot stand on our feet for this long, like it's it's wild, it is.

Speaker 5

And you know that that kind of also segues into the furlough thing that we were all very vocal on union support. You know, I had filed at this point two ulps because of the extended probation and because they suspended me for three days for something that was absurd, and I had filed two ulps, and this came like

right on the heels of that second ulp. They you know, we had Christmas Day off and I had taken the next day, the Tuesday off, so I was visiting family in Dallas, and I believe everyone else had that Tuesday off as well. And we come back on that Wednesday, and you know, we're working a red deer's shift.

Speaker 6

About halfway through.

Speaker 5

The shift, they say, okay, you know, we're having a red kitchen meeting. Everyone come into the office, which that had never happened before. We never had an all kitchen meeting like that. They pull us in and you know, we're all looking at each other on the way in, like, oh fuck, what are they going to do? Like are they going to reduce our hours? Are they going to fire one of us? You know what's happening? And we get in there and head chef Stephanie Thornton says, okay,

so you know, we've had an issue happen. What's happened is our distributors have told us that they are returning a bunch of our product. It's you know, some of it's expired, but most of it is just fine, but

it's nearing its expiration date, so they're returning it. I'm saying that m okay, sounds fake, but okay, And then they say, unfortunately, because of this, because we don't have space in our freezer to continue to put product in the freezer, to continue to make product and put it in the freezer, we are having to put you guys on indefinite furlough. You know, we don't have a return to work date. We don't have a plan for bringing

you back. You know, we asked, can we get you know, those of us who are cross trained, can we work in other areas? Can you cross train those of us who aren't, so that we can work up front or work at a satellite store. You know, they are literally hiring for satellite stores. But they furloughed us, and we were asking can we do these other things? And they said no, point blank no, So all of a sudden, you know, six people who had jobs, you know, a minute or two ago. All of a sudden, we're facing

For me personally, I'm facing homelessness. That's the reality, you know. And we have too our two shift leads. They are a couple and they live together and like that is their entire income. Yeah, and it's just on a kind

of more personal note, it's wild. And maybe this is me being a little bit naive, but it's wild to have spent months in company with these people and have them pretend to care about me and then have them do something that quite literally puts my life in danger, especially because I had just signed up for healthcare with them and I have multiple chronic illnesses. I have to go to doctors regularly, And all of a sudden, I'm like, holy shit, my life has completely changed in thirty seconds.

Speaker 3

You know, this is the day after Christmas? What?

Speaker 6

Yeah, the day after Christmas.

Speaker 5

We were given two days notice, gez in two days starting on January first. You don't have a job, and we don't know how long, but you know, we'll let you know if we ever are going to do production again, and we can bring you back even just for a little bit, which they didn't. They started up production again and we were not told or called in or anything.

Speaker 4

I touch a little more on our shift leads for a second.

Speaker 7

Yes, there are a couple.

Speaker 4

They live together, but much like them, they are basically they're facing houselessness as well. And luckily they do have another roommate who can someone cover them, but that can't last forever. Yeah, and just the other day I had

to run them groceries. They can't afford anything, and it's it's a huge buck over for them because they love they are so passionate about this job and like they rely heavily on it, and they got their pay raises and their higher positions and more responsibilities, and to be so betrayed like that from a company quite literally destroyed them.

Speaker 7

Are lead.

Speaker 4

He had a full breakdown and stormed out and walked out, and it affected them so heavily and so emotionally and still mentally, and they keep trying to, you know, find other jobs, and you know, still in contact. Just yesterday they sent me a screenshot of them talking to chef and being like, hey, is there any updates? Is there you know, any way we can come get our job back because you know, we're still waiting for you to tell us literally anything. And Chef said, oh, we don't know.

We can't give you an answer right now, and just kind of brushed it off.

Speaker 5

And one thing that's particularly insulting is that they ended this meeting with us where they were telling us we were losing our jobs by giving us a sheet of paper on how to file for unemployment in Oregon. And the thing with an indefinite furlough, if you don't have a return to work date, then you have to go. You have to jump through the hoops of applying for

jobs while you're like in order to get unemployment. So like, if you're if you have a return to work date and it's within four weeks of the uh, you know, the day that you got furloughed, you can get unemployment for that time.

Speaker 6

And you don't. You can just hang out and get unemployment.

Speaker 5

If you don't have a return to work date, you have to treat it as a layoff and you have to be making at like conscious efforts to job hunt every single week. You have to record those efforts. If you get an interview, you have to take it. If you get a position offered, to you. You have to take it, and it has to be in the field that you got that you got furloughed from, and there's all these very specific rules and it just makes it incredibly difficult, you know, all these hoops you have to

jump through. It's dehumanizing, it's fucked up, and it's insulting, and.

Speaker 4

There is no support other than that. If you support, there's no severance package. There was no like short in the meeting, they're like, yeah, sorry, guys, this sucks, but like it just didn't feel real, like this full situation was not empathetic at all.

Speaker 3

And like obvious, and you know, you could tell their excuses bullshit because like okay, like let let let's say what they were saying was real that like, okay, they got a bunch of stuff return and they don't have room in their freezers. It's been a month. They should now, there's no way that they now still do not have room in their freezers.

Speaker 5

Like what Well, and here's the here's the kicker is that we were for maybe them a month, maybe over a month really since we filed the union petition, since we handed them the petition, we had ramped up production even though we were in the slow season, and we were not actually like the bites that we were making were not ordered by anyone. We were just putting. We were making extra to put in the freezer.

Speaker 4

Not only the freezer, but they rented a whole entire warehouse.

Speaker 3

We have a strategy.

Speaker 5

Yeah, So they they did this, you know, I don't want to say they did this on purpose, but it is mighty suspicious to me that they're that they're building up these these you know, bites in the freezer when they didn't need them, when they didn't have orders for them, and now all of a sudden, oh, we don't have room.

Speaker 6

In the freezer, we have to let you go, you know.

Speaker 4

Yeah, yeah, oddly convenient.

Speaker 6

It is. It is.

Speaker 5

And that really ramped up when they when we gave them the union petition November seventeenth.

Speaker 3

Yeah, which is just really very blatant retaliation.

Speaker 4

Yeah.

Speaker 5

Yeah, And I have filed an unfair labor practice for it's called what they call a lockout for the you know, us being furloughed, and it, like you said, it really is blatant, especially given that you know, even walking.

Speaker 6

Into that meeting, all of us were wearing our union buttons.

Speaker 5

I just why would you lay off an entire department, especially when that department is what is keeping your business afloat, Like that is the money maker for Blue Star is those wholesale bites, and we've.

Speaker 4

Been told that all the time. It's like these donut bytes make the money. So make that makes sense? Then why are you shutting down that money maker? And the other kitchen and front of house are like are still there still during production, like not touched by this at all.

Speaker 3

Yeah, And that's one of these things you get with employers all the time where it's like, well, okay, so employers very very clearly and obviously know where the money is made. They know exactly where the money is made, literally up until the moments that you start asking for more of the money you're making them, at which point suddenly like, oh who knows money comes from? Yeah, yeah, you have.

Speaker 4

No money, even though the CEO has like at least three Tesla's totally oh.

Speaker 5

My god, yeah, like Katie Pope can't take a little bit of a pay cut so that you know, we can all keep our jobs and you know, survive.

Speaker 6

It's wild.

Speaker 3

Yeah, and like, and I mean this is one of the other things too, is that like businesses, you know, this is this is the the way capitalism works, is that business businesses would rather fucking lose money than have their employees have slightly like not be intobilitating pain, not be sick, and get slightly more money.

Speaker 5

Yeah, it is crazy to me because this whole you know, they're they're hiring all these lawyers to to you know, you know, handle the union stuff, and I'm like, you shut down Red Kitchen, you hire these lawyers, You're doing all these efforts, and I'm like, you would have saved so much money if you just recognize our fucking union, Like that's how easy it is, you know.

Speaker 4

And not only that, we have what five shops in Portland, we have a shop in la as well, Los Angeles where prices are extravagant, like they have money. We know they have money, and we're honestly at the point, I'm at the point of show me your books, show me, prove to me that you do not have this money, because then that would be a different discussion. Like it's just it's frustrating. It's typical corporate business, and I'm over it. And the I'm over it for how they treat me.

I'm over how they treat my friends, my team. It's it's ridiculous and they should know better, honestly.

Speaker 10

Yeah.

Speaker 3

Yeah, So is there anything else that you two want to make sure you get in?

Speaker 6

Maybe just the gofund me?

Speaker 10

Yeah, yeah, how.

Speaker 3

Can people support you support the union?

Speaker 5

Yeah, so we have a go fund me set up for the six furload workers to provide a month's worth of income two weeks for the employees who quit early, and that is it's called Help Loose our Employees Fight Union Investing. And right now we're at just under one thousand dollars. Our goal for all six of those people's incomes for a month is fifteen thousand, just under sixteen thousand.

You know, I don't know if we'll ever reach that goal, but you know, the as much as we can get is great because right now, you know, I'm surviving on cereal. I know that the shift leads we were talking about earlier, you know, they're getting.

Speaker 6

Groceries from lydia. People are struggling.

Speaker 4

Yeah, yeah, I was definitely in my Survivor era on rice and beans. It was it's really tough, and you know, it is a big goal realistically, it is, but yeah, you know not to sound desperate, I think, but truly every little bit helps. If you can really only afford five or ten bucks, we'll take it. That is, we're so grateful for anything. And it's it's people's lives. It's literally people's lives. Multiple people are facing not being able to have a roof over their head because of this company.

So truly, any little bit helps.

Speaker 3

Yeah, so please go help them out. I I don't know this it it's just really really brutal too and especially like again, like this is also a fucking terrible time, Like there's there's never a good time to like be at risk of losing your home. Winter is especially fucking bad for that. There are yeah, so there there's so many.

There are so many sort of terrible compounding things that these union that these union busting companies are sort of relying on to screw over and intimidate and hurt the people who make them all their fucking money.

Speaker 6

So well, and that's what it did.

Speaker 5

It scared a lot of people into unfortunately voting no. It scared a lot of people who were really involved, you know, in the organizing process to step back and you know, not respond to our text messages and not continue to advocate for the union. It you know that us getting furloughed really fucked with our whole union campaign.

Speaker 3

So yeah, go go, go, give, go, go, give these workers your supports. They really need it, and yeah, go you know, and one thing again like that needs to sort of we need to sort of emphasize, is that this is illegal. They cannot fucking they legally cannot do this, but you know this is this is one of the things that is fucking hard about union organizing is that the law, assuming the law does like ever fucking catch up to these people. It takes time.

Speaker 4

And yeah, there is one little thing I do want to make sure people know about because we just found this out pretty recently. While we were doing shop visits. They have jars for tips that say tips are shared with the kitchen. They're not.

Speaker 6

Yeah, that's not true.

Speaker 3

That's not true.

Speaker 4

We saw no tips, and there was an instance where we accidentally got tips, and one by one we were sent to the back to sign a form saying this was an accident, you are not gaining tips. Sign this, and they took our tips away. It's not fair. And on top of that, they're lying to the public. They're lying to their customers that kitchen is gaining tips when we're not.

Speaker 5

Yeah, and I will say, in addition to the GoFundMe, we do have you know, if you're not able to support monetarily, we do have a Twitter and an Instagram where we post updates if you want to follow along with our progress and see you know, how our election goes and everything. It's just on both Twitter and or excuse me and Instagram. It is at DWU Underscore Blue Star.

Speaker 3

So yeah, well we'll have we'll have links to all this out of the description.

Speaker 4

Awesome. Word of mouth is really the biggest thing, even going off again, like, if you can't support us financially, you can just share the go fundme through friends, family, whoever, and just spread it out there.

Speaker 3

Yeah, and so go go go do that. Yeah, go help any way you can. And yeah, go go go fight your own bosses because they're screwing you, like screwing you in very similar ways. What's happening here two? Yeah, and this is the spy nicket up in here. You can find us at Twitter and Instagram at happen here pod and you can find more clos Obdia shows at closeid Media. Yeah, go go go into the world and make life worse for people who do terrible stuff.

Speaker 10

Hi, everyone, and welcome to it could Happen here podcast about how things are falling apart and people trying to put them back together. Today, more in the how things are Falling apart category. We are talking about the border again and I'm joined by Gen Budd, who you've heard from before, but just a reminder. Jen is a former senior patrol agent with the Border Patrol and now an immigrant rights activist.

Speaker 7

Welcome to the show, Jo, Thanks for having me again.

Speaker 10

Yeah, you're welcome. So we're gathered here today, I guess to talk about this ridiculous spectacle of the Texas National Guard occupying some border adjacent land. The border as right down the middle of the river there, so they're not actually occupying that the physical border, right, they're occupying that the nearest land spot to it is that right.

Speaker 7

Correct, The border in that area is in the middle of the river.

Speaker 10

Yeah, and preventing Border patrol from accessing the river. And I think, like we were just talking before we recorded, but the reporting on this has been a bit kind of slap shot. A lot of it have just been social media posting so I was hoping that you could help us understand, like a this isn't like like a standoff between Texas and the Border patrol, right, but it's not like Texas kind of swept in and suddenly they were there and they weren't there before it. Border patrol

had to allow this to happen. To agree, is that fair to say?

Speaker 7

I think it's fair to say. I mean, at the moment, I think the administration is trying to portray that, you know, the Border Patrol tried to come out there and rescue. I think the latest I've heard is that reportedly there were six people in the river that were surrounding and they went to go rescue them, and the Texas Military the I guess Texas National Are ended up blocking them and saying they can't go. Now, this park is a very well known park that during the Trump administration they

were trying to build a wall. They've been wanting a wall there, but the people in that city, I believe it's equal pass is that they you know, they don't want a wall there. That's the city park and they just don't want a wall right there. And so Greg Abbott has sent in Texas National Guard to put up all the razor wire, all the you know, plotation devices with she would call it a sal blade on the

middle of it that they claim saves lives. All this stuff apparently is rescue technique stuff, and they claim it it saves more lives than it hurts. And so the people that put out this stuff to injure people or claiming that they didn't allow people to drown. So I find that hard to believe. But at the same time, the Border Patrol is the Border Patrol is always silent, you know, they are always silent about this. They let CBP talk to talk for them. They'll let the administration

talk for them. The Union is claiming that Greg Abbott is the best thing in the world. They think it's great that he stopped their own agents from rescuing a woman and two children. So apparently three of the people got back to shore on the Mexican side, and then the woman and two children ended up drowning and their bodies were found on the Mexican side. Texas military is claiming that when they were notified that people were in the river, they went and they shined lights and they looked,

but they didn't see anything. We did have the I

don't know if it was Texas military. It was in the area of the state of Texas on the same Rio or Grande, where some either National Guard or Texas National Guard or military or somebody just was sitting in a boat in front of a woman with a child and she was starting to sink into the sand because it's like quicksand over there, and they wouldn't rescue her, and Border patrol drove by really fast and put away, So it's not surprising that they wouldn't go rescue them.

This is the first time that they publicly said that they've had a confrontation with a border patrol. But I don't think the Border Patrol tried very hard to rescue them. I mean they do have boats and stuff.

Speaker 10

Yeah they have yeah, yeah, they're there are many way helicopters. Yeah, they have lots of equipment to rescue people sometimes just let's desire, shall we say?

Speaker 7

Yeah, And I mean it's to me the interesting thing is watching democratic politicians point their fingers at Greg Abbott, and rightly so for this, for this scene, but yet at the same time, what the Border Patrol does every day, their deterrence pulse these every day kill people every day,

so the Border Patrol is not doing anything different. So to act like, oh my god, we didn't get out to save these migrants and we really wanted to is kind of like, well, I mean, people die probably every hour crossing that river and you haven't cured before, and we've been doing it since nineteen ninety four. So it's kind of it's kind of hard to get really upset at Greg Abbott, who's doing nothing but what the National Border Patrol has done for, you know, thirty something years.

And at the same time, the victims are always the migrants that you know. That's what we should be upset about, is that our policies, whether federal or state, are killing people who are seeking asylum and seeking safety. That's what it is.

Speaker 10

Yeah, exactly. I think like this attempt to make it like Republican governor is killing migrants thing is an attempt to like distract us from the fact that democratic president is killing migrants in much greater numbers just by virtue of the amount of land covered by you know, Biden's jurisdiction compared to Abbots. But yeah, I think it's very hypocritical.

Speaker 7

And it's it's funny to you in that or I'm not funny but ironic, and that the Border Patrolley Union is putting out the numbers of when Trump's last year as president of death on the southern border, and these are just the ones that they find, not yeah, the actual number, which is usually three to four times as many. And then they're saying, oh, look in Biden's year, this has been twenty twenty three was the most deadly year.

But it's like, you know, you guys never cared about how many people were dying before, and now the sudden you're like, you're killing more Miran than anybody else.

Speaker 4

Are you jealous? What's the deal?

Speaker 10

Yeah, like the idea that these people that can send that they're like in a cumba. They keep people in open air attention for up to a week and in the freezing cold. You know, in San Diego Santasedro, people are two people have died Santa Sedro, one person has died. In the number probably dozens more people have died crossing in other routes that we haven't seen this year. It's it's been not as wet as previous winters. But just in my just in this week, I've seen people in

extremely dire medical distress. And I've seen border patrol scream at those people and scream that people trying to help those people, and not do anything to help. So I'm finding it hard to buy that this is all Greg greg Abbott's fault, not that Greg Abbott is't a piece

of shit. Yeah, I think we're in agreement on that, but like, yeah, the the attempt to lay all the blame at Greg abbots feet and suggests that there is a complete bipartisan agreement it seems, on killing migrants even like we don't see in the Trump era, we saw, you know, AOC turn up and cry at the you know, unaccompanied children or the other separation of family separation attention, and we don't even see that anymore, Like we don't

have any ear of that. And that's reflect in the press, right, we don't see anywhere near as much coverage of the brutality at the border as we used to. One thing that you've mentioned before we started with that you had there's some like there's pretty clear case law or Supreme Court decisions at least about like what BP could have done or what their rights are visa VI. The National Guard, could you explain some fat well as.

Speaker 7

Clear immigration precedent. So in eighteen seventy five, so prior to the Civil War, a little bit after the Civil War, states had always done their own immigration. So if you showed up in a boat on New Orleans in New Orleans Harbor, they would have their own immigration. You would have to pay a lot of times. In the California area, California was charging, especially Chinese migrants who were coming over for the railroad and the gold Rush and things like that.

When they brought groups of Chinese women over, then California would label the ball as prostitutes and no good people, and then they would put them in jail and then find the captain of the ship like five hundred dollars a person, which is by today's standards it's like over fourteen thousand dollars, such a lot of money. Yeah, yeah, And so one of the one of the female migrants in eighteen seventy five, So you had no right to

hold us in jail. You don't have this right. There's nothing that says that you have this right according to US law back then. And so the case is called Chai cchy Lung Lung versus freemen. And in eighteen seventy five. The Supreme Court decision was that immigration is solely the federal government's right to enforce and not the states, simply

because of diplomatic relations. Also that we have treaties with other countries, and we have relationships with other countries, and they believe that while allowing states to do their own immigration would then hurt the United States in diplomacy with these other countries. And then the other thing that they mentioned was that there have been no due process given to the migrants during the time, and that's sufforded to migrants,

whether they're undocumented or not, based on the Constitution. And then recently in two thousand. The most recent time that it was brought up was in twenty twelve when Arizona sued the United States. The Supreme Court upheld in that case that law enforcement can question citizenship during a legal stop, but denied other parts of the Arizona law SB. Ten seventy which allowed their peace officers to act like immigration officers. And they said, the reason why they can't do that,

which is what greg Abbott is doing. The reason why Supreme Court said they can't do that in twenty twelve was because of Article six clause two, which states that the Constitution federal laws treaties made under federal authority take priority over state laws. So it's, you know, the supremacy clause. Basically,

it's what it is. And so it's kind of like what Trump did when he was in office, where he starts separating children, and he starts putting everybody he crosses the border, whether it's for asylum or for nefarious reasons, in between the courts. He we'd take away their children. And I mean, that was in violation of the nineteen eighty Refugee Act, and yet nobody really fought it on that basis. I'm not sure why they didn't find it

on that basis. I'm not an attorney, so I can't tell you, but at least you know this this decision Chai Lung versus Freeman, It's been around since eighteen seventy five and was brought up in twenty twelve, and the Supreme Court awesome used Chai Lung to make its argument of why Arizona couldn't have certain parts of SB ten

seventy out. So what Greg Abbott is doing is the same thing Trump is, and is like, oh, will break the law, and you can take me to court and we'll see if this court agrees with what the last court said. So they're just breaking the law and then enduring people to take them to court is simply what they're doing. In in the middle of this. Obviously the migrants are caught, the humanitarian organizations and everybody's caught. It causes chaos, basically, is what it's doing.

Speaker 10

Yeah, it's causing an absolute mess at the border. And I think understandably what you hear from migrants is like, the people who are better informed, who have access to information, resources, finances, are telling me that they don't want to go to Texas, right because right, it's a mess, and it's a mess that kills people. And that's exactly what it's supposed to be. It's supposed to be uncertain, and it's supposed to be cruel, and so people who have the chance to you will

come here. People who can't afford to right that they're coming north directly and it sort of takes us is there, you know, if they head directly north, but that that's where they end up. Texas has a huge amount of border. Of course, then they're the people who tend to be the ones who are forced across there, and unfortunately that's realotten the much higher as you said, at much higher

death rate. Right, Nick, it's do you have a sense of like I suppose it will be hard to tell because we have very little and were proper statistics, but like, what is the most fatal kind of part of the border.

Speaker 7

It's difficult to tell if it's the Sonoran Desert or if it's the Rio Grande River. And I say that because we don't see half the bodies, or we probably don't see ninety percent of the bodies.

Speaker 10

Yeah, I know a lot of deaths are on the t reservation to reservation in there's.

Speaker 7

The bombing very goldwater bombing area that nobody's allowed in, but when they are occasionally allowed in, they find like groups of thirteen fifteen skeletons.

Speaker 3

And stuff like that.

Speaker 7

So I think it's a tassa between the Sonoran Desert and the Rio Grande River. The other problem with Texas's border is that primarily the majority of the property on the border in Texas is private property, and they tend to be very large ranches which may be no ranch hand or anybody goes out, you know, through the acres to see this, and they might never ever find the bodies.

It's kind of like the Sonoran desert and po nation and then the bombing range and then just the fact that the desert will just destroy the bones pretty quickly, especially once the winds cover thinks up that we have a fair amount and Campo, as you know, in the Hakamba Campo wilderness area and the mountains and the Laguna Mountains. But I don't think it's near as bad because you can look at those mountains and see how bad they are, and most people don't want to dare across those mountains,

but many still do. Obviously I worked up there. You you're familiar with that area, and so we have more than our fair share for certain. Yeah, but I would say I would say probably it's between Texas the Rio Grande and then the Sonora doesn't.

Speaker 10

For sure, Okay, yeah, yeah, I think I think that makes sense. It's probably a good time for us to break the border. Is getting people. These adverts probably aren't, but they're still not great. So you enjoy these products and services. All Right, we are back, and Jen, I wanted to ask, like, with regard to these I think there's a couple of things that people might not be clear on. We've tried to explain them on the podcast before.

The first is like Border Patrol will always say that all the BP agents are first responders, right, It's this line that they have, and like do they like in terms of rescues, are they sort of like technically obliged

to make rescues. I mean, I've seen people in very great stress and I've seen Border Patrol do nothing more times than I can count, So like I'm wondering, like is there some kind of like technical obligation that they have that they're just ignoring or is it sort of at the discretion of the agent whether they think it's safe. What's there like official policy there?

Speaker 7

Well, if you're an agent in the field and you come upon a migrant drowning in the water or you know, has slipped and broken their leg and you're trying to decide if you should go down into this area or jump in the water and stuff, it is up to the individual agent to decide if they can handle that. So what you find most often the agents who are in the boats and working on either the oceans and border. They work on the ocean in California and they work

on the ocean. Yeah, and then obviously along the Rio Grande. All those agents have specific training obviously and swimming. All agents have training and swimming, but not at the level that the agents who are working on the water deck. So you have to go through extra training when you take that position. It's like being on a horse patrol. You have to go through horse training and so forth. But all agents are trained in just basic CPR, just

basic splinting, that kind of first aid stuff. But not all agents are what they call it, not Vortech, but four Star, the rescue organization that they have now, and that's didn't start until like the late nineties. And I didn't even see him when I was an agent, even though I was there until two thousand and one. I didn't see him out in Campo whenever we had a call about a rescue in Campo, at least the old Campo station that was on four Skate Road before they

changed it all around. We had to go out in teams and that's the only time we worked in teens. Otherwise we hiked alone is if we were doing a rescue, especially in the wintertime, because it was even more dangerous and movie hiked all night until we found them. So US regular agents just on the line would just move our positions and keep going. And we didn't necessarily have any specific training. We didn't repel a lot of helicopters

back then and do all that stuff. What I think that they started for was because we had a lot of attrition in the nineties, and it was more about getting US regular agents that patrol the border away from the border because we were having that's when our massive suicide started, because of all the death that we were seeing. And I think it was an effort to keep the average agent from seeing the brutality of what they were doing, quite honestly, and so like I as an agent had

lots of experience with dead bodies and so forth. But agents today who are on the line, they don't. They sit in their trucks, they watch the cameras, and then when a dire thing comes out that somebody needs to be rescued forced our handles handles it. They might go do perimeter things and help out a little bit, but they're not involved in the actual rescues. You know, in

my day, I didn't know. I didn't know that many agents who had never seen who had never experienced that, And I kind of think in a weird way that that's what makes today's agents so non caring, so non sympathetic to the migrants. We didn't call them invaders. And it's not to say that we weren't racist and we're brutal.

It's just it's gotten even more brutal and more racist since since I was an agent, And certainly I would say that the brutality that may have happened that would have happened maybe on an individual basis or with certain groups of agents. It's now policy throughout the whole agency, and you're expected to be that brutal. And if you

can't be that brutal, then you can't hack it. So but the idea that they're all first responders, that just means they wear a bad and have a gun and have a car with you know, red and blue lights on it. But they're not all necessarily trained in like the type of rescue that we're talking about in the Hakamba area in the mountains that takes very physically. I could do it when I was younger, but obviously I

can't do it now. Yeah, Yeah, we would have to get our best best agents, and especially if we went north at the checkpoint north of I eight up into the Lagunas, we would have to get our best fit agents up there to do that.

Speaker 10

Yeah, and it seems like that I don't see them as much, certainly, like when there's a search and rescue now, just like everything else at the border very often falls on volunteers and community groups and people who are willing to give their time and take the nonnegtible personal risk to rescue people.

Speaker 7

Because he I think we might have rescued more people back then, even with half the amount of agents, simply because when we got the call, we went and we looked, and sometimes we'd meet the federal allies right at the border and they show us this is a group, and so we looked for the sign and then we could you know, frog it and get ahead of it. Whereas today if you call a bors Star, will all the Boord store agents have to get their gear on and then they have to get in the helicopter and then out.

Speaker 10

Yeah, and I mean that's even if they're willing. So like I know with a group that made a call this weekend for a gentleman who was in distress and had been suffering very greatly from exposure, and the agent in the office said it would be hours, maybe days before they arrived, right, So like if you can get through, if you can get them to come out, like you know that this and that that's very common. That's something

that that's not unusual at all. The disdain for coming to right, the disdain for people's lives, right for coming to rescue them. It is extremely obvious, really, and like that's a that's not someone haves to be located. Like I can give you a GPS reading down to you know, I think it's twenty figures, you know, extremely accurate location.

Speaker 7

It's just oh, yeah, we didn't have that in our day. I mean there was GPS, but we didn't have GPS capability. I never worked with GPS, so I worked with a compass that was pretty much.

Speaker 10

Yet, Yeah, it's yeah, I mean they have more technology than you know.

Speaker 7

I know, the agents today tell me they can see each other in the field. So they have something or their GPS system to tracked each other and so they can see where each other is. We never had.

Speaker 10

Yeah, they did to military technology, just like everything else that trickle down to the border patrol and sometimes trickles from the border patrol down to the military actually with a lot of the surveillance technology. Like, I think another thing that people might not be aware of, and this is something that I think has happened recently but being young for several years now, is the deployment of the

National God to the border. I think people know that that is happening in Texas, but I think people probably aren't aware that there's also a federal mission to the border, right that the encompasses much more than Texas. And what are they National God, Well, I mean they I know they sit outside detention camps in Ukumber shouting at me, but what is their mission in theory at the border? What are they doing there?

Speaker 7

Well, in theory their mission at the border is now they have these giant processing tints, you know in San Diego and in Cheese on ane of the things. So in general, what they're supposed to be doing is not actively arresting or apprehending people, because that, according to the law, would violate it. What they're supposed to be doing is is maybe sitting in a stationary spot operating the scope

where they can tell border patrol at night. You know, there's a group over here, DA DA DA, and then the rest of the time they're mostly supposed to be work working in the processing centers, assistant people if they need to go to medical or if they need this or that, and so they're just supposed to help so that the agents don't have to sit around and babysit so much so that they can be back in the field. That's what they're supposed to be doing. And I mean

lots of presidents have done it. Barack Obama did it, you know, so it's not unusual unusual. What is unusual is that in Texas you have Texas DPS and the military Texas National Guard actually pretending like they are border patrol agents and running around and apprehending people even though they do not have that legal authority. The US government has not given it to them. And then the other thing I think which is legally the most dangerous is

where they push the migrants back into the water. Number one, The law is that if you set foot on US soil, then you're entitled to an immigration hearing if you so choose, and you cannot turn somebody back. Agent cannot legally turn somebody back once they've crossed, so once they're across that middle part of the river, they're in the United States and they're your problem now. So you have to deal with that, and you have to process them. You have to figure out who they are, you have to friend

and records checks and all this other stuff. It'd be interesting. You know. The Biden administration has it pressed Abbot on this, and I've always wondered, why are they allowing him to do this and take over immigration as a state authority. Yeah, I think they just don't want to fight it.

Speaker 10

Yeah, they don't want to be attacked on like this, like this idea that Biden's like, there's this myth of Biden's opens borders, which is actually ridiculous, and be like, as Erica reminded us last week, like we all as US passport holders, have open borders to us all over the world. It's very problematic. We think other people shouldn't. But yeah, I think the idea of like looking weak or like, you know, he wants to himself against an attack from the right.

Speaker 7

So's the same reason why he won't get rid of the Border Patrol Union, because you know, the Border Patrol Union. Now that Donald Trump, before he left Diet, he gave them what's called security designation, So there are they are a security organization now, which means they're like the FBI, they're like the DA and all this other stuff, and so they can't have a bargaining unit. So the Border Patrol Union is actually illegal under five USC seven one

one two, little b little sixth. But Biden is weak and he doesn't want to look like he hates unions. He always wants to look like he's strong on unions because he's a union politician, and he refuses to get rid of them. But the fear and the reason why that law exists is exactly what we see them doing now, where the union representatives who are Border patrol agents, they have national security information and they're actively working against this current administration.

Speaker 3

Yeah, so that's why we have it.

Speaker 7

But he's just weak and he won't do anything about.

Speaker 10

It, right and it certainly I think whoever wins next time, they're not going to do anything about it now. Yeah, I think either way. You like also pattention to the VP union and I think it's one of the worst accounts on Twitter dot com. But I also like, I'm in the event of a Republican victory which at the moment it's looking like Trump might be then nominee. Right, Certainly, it seems for support for Trump kind of these people seem to have his ear on immigration and they seem

to want the same things. Right, So I'm wondering Biden has been bad. His border policy has been objectively bad, and it's very hard for me not to see it as racist. Like it's very hard for me not to see his immigration specifically favoring white people and specifically disadvantaging black people. And I don't think I could be persuaded

that's not the case. What do you think, Like it seems that immigration policy only moves one way and it just gets worse and worse, and border policy does the same. What are they like demanding and what do you think is sort of at stake in the upcoming election this year's election regarding the border.

Speaker 7

So I was paying attention to what Speaker Johnson was saying before we logged on to talk, and he was saying that there was going to be no deal for the border unless Donald Trump was the one doing the deal. So he doesn't want to even fund the border patrol right now. So, I mean, my impression of what the border patrol, and what the Union is trying to do at this moment is that they are trying to make the border as chaotic as absolutely possible, and that is

their goal. They want bodies, black and brown bodies coming over that fence, and they want the optics of it. That's what I think is going on, and that's why I think that they're picking specific cities to have a lot of the migrants come through. I think that that's the reason why they have like specific cities, because you saw like a couple of weeks together, they're like, oh my god, the border's being overrun and oh my god,

what are we going to do? And this and that, and then you realize it's just like three or four sectors, and even within those sectors, it's just one or two areas. It's not the entire border. Is it problematic? Is it chaotic? Is it a human rights disaster for the minents? Yes? Is it that for the border patrol? No? I think

the border patrol is adding to it. And in fact, when I do the numbers and you compare like the staff that we have back when I was an agent and the staff that they have today, they're not even apprehending half the amount that each agent apprehended when we were in the patrol back in the day. And so you know, for them to apprehend the group now, when I see them apprehend a group of life, even ten people, twelve people, they will take five agents to apprehend twelve people.

I have apprehended one hundred people by myself, and that's not safe. I shouldn't suggest that people do that, but I have apprehended It is normal for a border patrol agent to apprehend twenty to thirty people by themselves, including a female agent who's at the time was super skinny and super small. And the reason why is because the vast majority of migrants aren't criminals and they're not trying to hurt you. So that's why a single agent can

apprehend so many people. But today they use like six or seven agents to apprehend groups, and so I'm not sure why they're overwhelmed. Quite frankly, they should be able to handle three hundred and four hundred thousand people a month in the border patrol if they have to.

Speaker 10

Yeah, even though a world without the border patrol would be better, in a world without this bloated and violent and overfunded and really terribly just just a mess of quality and violence that we have now would be a lot better, but things could get a lot worse for those people, like even the time it takes for them to be processed, and that the time it takes for them to have their hearing. Immigration law could change for

the worse very quickly if either person wins presidency. And indeed, like it seems that Biden has floated like a return to Title forty two as a as a compromise to get funding for Ukraine. So like, yeah, this inefficiency doesn't just like even when people are apprehended, their failure to do their jobs hurts people right like it it puts them at greater risk.

Speaker 7

It does. And I mean a lot of the things that the Border Patrol has done has created it and made these things worse. A lot of the areas out near Sasabe, a lot of people never even crossed until Trump put that wall out there because they didn't have road access to a lot of that area. And if you did have road access, you had to have a very serious four by four to get out there. You can't do it in a regular car, and you can't do it in a kind of city type of four

by four. You need a serious four by four to get it into some of those areas. And then just our policies are deterrence policies. You know, when I was an agent in the nineties, it costs you know, probably somebody from Central America costs about eighteen hundred dollars to get here. Now it's ten thousand or more dollars. So we've made it profitable for people to smuggle people in and cross them illegally. Illegally, We've created this entire situation ourselves.

I mean, I don't have any doubt that other countries that maybe don't like that, you know, all the migrants coming across, the destabilization that will cause with people who are racist or who don't know anything about the border, they all see that as a bonus. But the fact of the matter is is that people who are crossing

they still need asylum, they still have serious needs. Just because you know, I've seen some people floating around that people are pushing migrants across our southern border to destabilize US. I don't know if that's necessarily true. We don't have any proof of that. But even if they are, isn't the better attitude to have because asylum is legal, isn't

the better attitude to have? Well, how can we better, you know, help these people and not let this destabilize who we are and make them part of our communities and so forth. I think that's a better choice than sending them out to the desert or to drown in the rivers.

Speaker 10

Yeah. Absolutely, And I think it bears. I mean, people listening to this will probably be in agreement that, yeah, these people should be treated preticunanty and respect adless. And I generally don't buy that they're being shipped on mass

to destabilize this country. But I think even if you don't care about their rights, every single advance advance is around word, right, But increase in surveillance, every single increase in state violence, every single incursion into individual rights starts at the border, but it doesn't stop there, right, Like, if you've protested in twenty twenty, you were surveilled by

technology that came from the border. You were sometimes targeting by Leslie for weapons that were first issued to border patrol, Like you're the intelligence that police now gather began with border patrol. Like so much of the even the stuff that we see used at the border today or the stuff that we see using surveillance today overwhelmingly comes from either border patrol or the Israel as a border. And also most of these things are the same companies, right,

Companies that do one also do the other. And so like, I guess if people are talking to people who don't seem to care about the rights of migrants, which is a worryingly large amount of our society, like this will come and bite someone else in it, like to include the people who decided to storm the capitol on January sixth, twenty twenty one. Right, Like, lots of this effectant technology that bit them in the Ayes came from the border and the people they hated.

Speaker 7

And that's absolutely true. And I mean, you know it's the Border patrol says this, but they mean it in a different way. They say, what happens at the border doesn't stay at the border, and they mean that because they try and portray migrants as all criminals. So they're trying to tell people, oh, see, these criminals are going

to come to Iowa or Illinois and so that. But I say, in the fact that the surveillance has come into you because you know, I mean you know, in San Diego, we got street lamps out here that can listen to US and video US YEP and track wherever we're going down the street, from lock to block. And it's ridiculous. You can't even walk your dog without being surveilled around here. And yet we're far from them, twenty miles from the border, north of the border, and it's

still surveilled around here. And so all of that surveillance, yes, that's being used on American citizens. And when you go to places like McCallan, so the Rio Grande Valley sector right now, it's really slow. They're getting about a little over one thousand, maybe two thousand apprehensions a week, which is really slow size of the sector. And they're like, you know, they have so much surveillance, Like you can

see there's a tower, there's a tower. There's a tower there, and it is all this Israeli technology and they can listen to cell phones and that usually needs a warrant. But apparently down here on the border, and I've had current border patrol agents tell me the Fourth Amendment doesn't

exist down here. It's like, what is that one they're teaching here in the academy now doesn't exist down here, and apparently that's what border patrol agents think, and they think they have to do I do anybody that they see and all this other stuff, and it just it's it's interesting how much this is spreading, how much the checkpoints are spreading. And you know, like in mind, we didn't do invasive searches if it wasn't obvious, we didn't

stop them. And nowadays they'll do on full body cavvy searches at a checkpoint and I'm like, what I heard that? And so all this stuff is just gonna it's just getting further and further into the interior of the United States, like we saw in the trip nutrition like you said, yeah, it's going to be brought back out for sure. Yeah.

Speaker 10

Yeah. So I wonder, like how do we I mean, it does seem very bleak, like I which is why I like to devote so much of my time to like mutual aid work on the border, because it's a meaningful way to help. But how do we move the

needle to a more humane place? Like this is one of the places where like I think, like we should do whatever we can to make this like even if it's something that would normally be this tasteful to us, but like, yeah, what is it that we can do to either, like maybe change people's minds, Like I'm sure you yourself have changed your mind on what we need to do on the border and to because the conversation around the border is not only toxic, but it's also

so deeply rooted in ignorance and lack of understanding, and like, I don't think we were talking about this before we started back. Like I encountered a three year old girl the other day who was extremely cold. She had her feet have been wet and cold for hours days and she was the cold beyond shivering, and we were trying to warm her up, and it was very disstressing. I

don't think many people have seen that. And I don't think even you're like sort of hardest border big at face book uncles would want to look that in the face and be like, yeah, that's what we should do. Damn, I'm really proud of this country, So how do we move this to a better place?

Speaker 1

Do you think?

Speaker 7

I think one of the biggest mistakes that the Biden administration did was that they didn't, you know, in the beginning, they hired a lot of really really good people, like I think Andrea Flores was one of the administration people, and she knows her stuff, and I think that they had this idea from what she had said that the people that support immigration and immigrant rights in this and that she was saying that they were viewed as soft

hearted individuals on immigration and they were too soft and they didn't understand border security. One of the things that Biden should have done was start educating Americans about why the asylum system is so important and what the benefits are that it brings to us. And they have never done that. There's no about it. There's nothing And I don't know if NGOs do it on that large environment on cable news or whatever, because they don't really watch

mainstream news and stuff. But Americans are just astonished it. Like when I started doing the TikTok videos and explaining, you know, border patroling, the people in green cbps and Blues people didn't know just the basic things. The majority of Americans who feel that they have a very a very specific view on immigration, whether they hate it or they love it, they don't know much about immigration. They

don't know how it works. They literally think people just get off their couch and go let's just go to America. And they just hop over the fence and they all have money and they're all getting free stuff and this and that. So this administration, the government has done nothing to explain what is happening and why it happens. And I always say that the asylum system is essential to

national security. What we saw in the Biden administration when he first opened up the ports of entry to allow specifically Haitians to apply at the ports of entry, we saw the amount of Haitians go from the crossing in between the ports it regularly. We saw it going from you know, thousands down to like one hundred and something. So the idea is that you have to have a robust and humane asylum system where you're processing people where they don't have to wait so long that they're going

to give up across it regularly. Because the vast majority of people who believe that they have a legitimate asylum. Clane and I do think that what constitutes the asylum needs to be revisited because it's outdated, especially now that we have client and change. But is that you want those people to come and be inspected. We want people to come and stand outside the port of entry and wait and be inspected by CBP. If we're going to

have a border, we're going to have all this. We would want that so that then we could say, Okay, we've checked them. They appear to be okay, they're going to this place. Now they have an immigration hearing before a judge. We're going to make sure that they get the system and you know, and then see it more as a system that's a benefit to us instead of

creating enemies, which is what we're doing now. Every time a migrant turns around, even if they do are able to get into the United States the quote unquote legal way at a port of entry, they're still met with you can't work for one hundred and fifty days, and then you can't do this, and you can't do that, and you have to show up. And so we're constant. Everything is punishment, Everything is punitive in our immigration system, and we can't do that. We want these people to

become citizens. We want these people to become part of our our society. We need it, and so we have to we have to have somebody bold enough to explain this to the American people. If you close the asylum system. Everybody's going to cross regularly, just like they did in Title forty two, and you're going to get tons and tons of bodies coming across the wall. We need to be bold enough to say we want a humane and robust asylum system where families can wait together and be processed.

And then, you know, I mean the decision between should we fund detention centers and home people who are crossing just waiting for their immigration hearing in detention, or should we fund you know, humane services, like let's get you into whatever city you're going to. Let's help you find a school for your kids, Let's help you learn English, let's help you find a job, Let's help you and you can hire and pay people to do that instead of putting people in attention. It doesn't have to be

a punitive system. We've just made it that way because the people on the for profit prisons before Trump was supposedly elected, they were lobbying Jeff Sessions and Steven Miller when he was working for Jeff Sessions and so Geo and all them. They're the ones that decided this is how we're going to go. And the fact of the matter is is I know, I think we're on a disagreement with open border versus you know, or having border patrol at all. But I always say an open border

is just as dangerous as a closed border. And when when you close off the asylum system, that forces everybody to then cross in between the ports of entry, and that is what does overwhelm border patrol. So if you don't want to overwhelm your border patrol, then you have to pull them back and you have to start processing people like they're supposed to be processed at the court

of entry. The other thing people forget about is we've had four years, literally four years of the asylum system being shut down because of MPP and Title forty two. Those are Trent policies. It took by no while to get through all those. But what do you think all those people that were sitting around for four years are doing there waiting? They're turning to get over there. So we have a backlog not just the people in the United States waiting for the immigration hearing, we have a

backlog of people in Mexico waiting to come across. So they created this whole thing themselves. I find it very interesting the press never mentions that basically what TRUP did was close the whole immigration system down and kick the can down the road.

Speaker 10

Yeah yeah, I mean consciously or unconsciously. It's like shaken up a can of beer and then someone's going to take a little off at some point, you know, and it's going to blow out. Oh yeah, and it's been willing to and so it's still going to get kicked down the road. I mean, people have come in since the end of title forty two, but as you say, there's a huge backlog, and people aren't, as you say, going to stop coming, right because like it's dangerous getting here.

I've walked those trails. They're not easy, and they're certainly not easy when you're carrying your kid and it's raining and it's dark, but it's I've also been in Syria, in Iraq and in other places where these people are coming from, and I understand why they're doing it, and I would do it too if I had a family

and I wanted to escape that. So I think we're laughing if we think that we're going to I mean, we've tried to make our border as unpleasant as those places, and it's deadly as those places, right, and fortunately we failed and so that doesn't mean people will stop coming whatever we do.

Speaker 7

We've had thirty years of walls and border patrols, concept of deterrence policies that they claim will prevent people from crossing irregularly or illegally, and they've all failed. And I think it's time to try something new. I think it's time to stop listening to the people who get all the money and get all the guns and get all the militarizations saying it has to be this way. It does not have to be that way. And I think it's very important to point out that we live in

the United States of America. Even though we have a lot of problems and we're possibly losing our democracy in our country right now, it is still far better than the places that these people are coming from, and we should be thankful for that and then figure out a way to protect ourselves as just as we can.

Speaker 10

You know, yeah, yeah, I think I think that's yeah, it's a good place to end. Like, we should be grateful that for now we live in a much more stable place and that we were able to we have the resources to welcome people, and we do the benefit to our communities when we.

Speaker 3

Have from us.

Speaker 7

Yeah, we need people right now.

Speaker 10

So yeah, people forever bitching about not being able to find people to work and also at the same time turning away people who would love. You know, every migrant I meet in the cumber message me on WhatsApps saying, Hey, struggling to find work because they don't get work authorization. Right there are a lot of jobs that you're doing, and a lot of people who want to do them, and but we're so wrapped up in our bigger trendenophobia that we won't let them do it right.

Speaker 7

We've made it as difficult for them as we absolutely positively can.

Speaker 10

Yeah, Jen, thank you for joining us. Is there any way that people can like follow you on line? You've done a really good job at sort of cracking some of the board patrols nonsense recently. So where can people find that?

Speaker 7

They can find it on jin the j E N Nthudd dot com.

Speaker 10

Great mesair, it's a good resource. And well, thank you so much, jenf. We really appreciate your time.

Speaker 7

I appreciate you.

Speaker 11

Jeerz bye, Okay, hello, welcome to It could happen here.

Speaker 12

This is Sharene today. I am joined by you know you know him.

Speaker 3

You love him.

Speaker 12

It's Robert.

Speaker 10

Hi, Robert Ah.

Speaker 2

Someone knows me and loves me.

Speaker 3

That's nice.

Speaker 12

Robert is here today to talk with me to Charles McBride. But I met Charles fairly recently doing just pro Palestine stuff online, and I really liked his work. He's here to talk about some things that I think are very important to like Ukraine, and why helping Ukraine is not the same thing as aid to Israel and all that good stuff. And yeah, let's just get right into it. I want to know your experience with Ukraine. Can you just tell us a little bit about that first?

Speaker 3

Sure.

Speaker 13

First of all, thank you sharing so much for having me on. This has been one of my favorite podcasts for a while. So this is kind of a slightly surreal moment going into my experience with Ukraine. I double majored in history in comparative religion in college, and I was kind of interested in sort of the post Soviet sphere, and I worked on some kind of post Soviet issues when I lived.

Speaker 10

In Washington, d C.

Speaker 13

After school, and also was deeply interested in Eastern Orthodox Christianity, which is kind of why I took an interest in that region. So I remember in like twenty fifteen, I watched this Vice video called Russian Roulette that popped up on my YouTube feed, and it just completely it just put Ukraine on the map for me in a way that I'd never really thought about before. I thought of it as the Ukraine. Yeah, Yeah, my Muscovite Russian history

professor had always talked about it as a part of Russia. Yeah, And she had denied, you know, I was during the Midaan, the Revolution of Dignity. I was in college, and she denied that Ukraine had any autonomy. She echoed all the putinesque sort of talking points about CIA intervention and neo Nazis and stuff, and I didn't really know what. I didn't know at that point. So then I, yeah, I got interested in in sort of what was happening in

the lead up to the Russian invasion. And I had been following this guy who went over to Syria a couple of years ago named Aidan Aslin, And in my conversations with aid And he'd sort of told me a little bit about kind of what stuff was like in going on in Ukraine, and I got very interested. I was following him and all of his friends and what

they were doing. And at that point, I had, you know, about four or five years of nonprofit humanitarian experience under my belt as long as as well as sort of a historical political understanding of the region. And so when the war happened, when the full scale invasion happened, I immediately started trying to fundraise, trying to help out, trying to educate, and mostly to try and cut through Russian propaganda because there were a lot of people in my sphere who

were just retweeting straight up Russian propaganda. They were elevating you know what you and I know who are basically Kremlin adjacent individuals in the United States who have sway and leftist circles, some of whom have re emerged in the Palestine discussion, much to my chagrin.

Speaker 2

Yeah, yeah, I'm sure we'll talk about that more later.

Speaker 3

I would love to.

Speaker 10

Get into that.

Speaker 13

Yeah, And so, yeah, in my hope was to kind of to do that, and as I was sort of working with Ukrainian It's one of the things they said is, hey, man, everything happens here. You have to be in Ukraine to get anything off the ground, So you need to come here. And I'm like, are you insane's there's a war going on in your country. So I said yes, and yes, yes,

I am in retrospect. So second week of the war, I booked a plane ticket, flew over there, a crossed the train into Poland, scared out of my mind, got in touch with the Ukrainians I've been talking to previously, and after a mad hustle from the train station, was very comfortably drinking tea and a cute little apartment in Leviv with somebody's grandmother, and I was like, this is this crazy experience. So I spent two months in Ukraine.

At the beginning, my attention was to sort of identify gaps in the medical supply chain, particularly things that were going to be initially overlooked in the mad dash of refugees and reset men and all that sort of stuff. And one of the things we identified was like prescription medication for people coming from the east to the west.

And yeah, I think it's important that not a lot of realized that people coming from eastern Ukraine, a lot of them had never visited cities like Leviv until the start of full scale invasion, predominantly Russian speakers, and you know, for them, Leviv was almost like going to Poland, and it was a very new thing for them. But you know, your medical issues don't stop just because someone invades their country.

In fact, oftentimes they get worse. And so what I was trying to do initially was find a way to address that, and that led me into contact with Rostaslov Philippinko, who's one of my dear friends and the co founder of the organization that we started together called Mission Harkiv.

So that organization worked initially on prescription medications and then started distributing high end oncology drugs, which are very difficult to transport, very lucrative to steel, and very difficult to store because they have to be kept at a constant temperature. So we focused on those things while everybody else was focusing on tints and you know, and clothes for refugees

and that sort of stuff. And as a result, we carved out a very interesting niche in terms of the humanitarian response and are still going strong with that today. And so that was initially kind of why I went over there for that first two months, and since then I've been back over to film a documentary, sort of an artistic short documentary called Note of Defiance, and then I was involved with another documentary project which is hopefully forthcoming in the next year.

Speaker 2

Nice. Yeah, I don't think I've talked about this on the show, but kind of my relationship with Ukraine and eventually going over there and starting to report on what was happening started weirdly enough as a result of the fact that I had friends who went to the big burning Man event in Nevada, and I wound up traveling with one of them in India, this Ukrainian woman who lived in the Bay and when stuff started in late twenty thirteen, which is when the Revolution of Dignity is

kind of the common Ukrainian name for it. You'll also hear it referred to as like the twenty fourteen revolution of the Madan Revolution. They're all talking about the same thing, which is when the guy who was the President of Ukraine trying to make himself into a dictator. This dude, Victor Yanikovich, who is this incredibly wealthy oligarch who literally built a golden palace for himself with like a fake lake that had a boat on it, that was a restaurant.

Speaker 10

For just him.

Speaker 2

For like the level of rich oligarch asshole we're talking about here, cracked down really brutally on a student protest, which it kind of culminated in this kind of escalating occupation of the Center Square in the capitol that basically got built into an ice fortress and like the middle

of the Ukrainian winter. This very very like pretty epic story of successful resistance because this guy is eventually forced out the police riot unit, the bearcoot who had done had been literally killing people by dropping them naked, and

like ice drifts and stuff, are disbanded. It's a really remarkable story and I just kind of fell into it because my friend connected me with a couple of people who were on the ground there who were friends of hers, who were Ukrainians in the tech industry who traveled to the US every year or so for Burning Man and so when this occupation of the Maidan started, they were like, well, we know how to, like we're used to making soup and food for large numbers of people and like running

little chunks of a camp, so we'll just start We'll just do the thing that we do at our camp out over in Maidan. They were part of the thing they were part of was the Automidon, which was this like mobile unit of resupply where people would like basically drive supplies to and from different areas of occupation in the city. It was a pretty dangerous job as things escalated, but that was my ind and I wound up talking to like, I don't know, twenty or thirty people like

actively the entire time the occupation was going on. There's like two folks I never was able to get back in touch with who just kind of like dropped off at a certain point. Like it was a really sketchy

time for a lot of people. But I wound up traveling there the year after, right after the early part of the invasion, started to report from Avdifka, which is, you know, was had been under siege for a year at that point and is still under siege today, for an idea of like that's a decade now basically that this this little town has been shelled.

Speaker 12

Yeah, anyway, Yeah, I didn't know that about burning Man. That's well, it was a weird.

Speaker 2

Way to get connected to it. Yeah. I just got a message from this friend of mine who was like, hey, somebodies from my camp are like trying to overthrow their government.

Speaker 3

Do you want to talk to them.

Speaker 10

I was like, well, yeah, that sounds pretty dope.

Speaker 3

Yes, that's your remo. That's wild.

Speaker 13

You know what burning Man really does apply It provides, It really connects all, doesn't it. I have some weird like tangential burning I've never been.

Speaker 2

But I have like neither of I actually yeah.

Speaker 13

I'd like Burning Man devotees who play a large role in my life and it's just very interesting.

Speaker 2

Yeah, yeah, the weird little connections you get. And I was kind of disappointed, you know. To me, this was because the whole time, especially like the late twenty thirteen early twenty fourteen, as this was going on, I was like, well, they're probably all going to get killed, right, like just you know, we were several years in the Syrian Civil War at this point, Like I was not optimistic, and

that's not what happened. And then there was like this counterpoint of realizing a few years later that oh, a shocking number of people on the left think it was a bad thing that they overthrew their government. Yeah, which, yeah, I guess gets us into like the kind of thing you wanted to talk about, which is the difference in providing military aid to Ukraine versus Israel. Yeah, which I

don't know. I mean, from my standpoint, it's pretty obvious, right, Like, one country is fighting a military that has a massive industrial base, much more powerful than it and is killing large numbers of civilians, and they have proven their ability with military aid to react effectively to this invasion. And the other case, I don't think I need to explain which one, but it's Israel is a country with a massive arms industry that is fighting people who have no

arms industry of any kind and primarily killing civilians. So I can very easily justify one of those groups of people getting US weapons and one of them not needing any additional weapons.

Speaker 10

That's right, ye.

Speaker 13

See, Robert. None of that is justified because of the existence of the Ashok Battalion. There is no right for any Ukrainian grandmother to get access to her insulin because there's a couple of Nea Nazis that were stationed in Mariople. But truly, that is that is about how sophisticated. A lot of the leftist critiques of the Ukraine of supporting Ukraine are I think a lot of it comes in one of the things that I talk about, and I talked with Sharin about this when we went on Instagram

Live together. Is that a lot of leftists seem to live in kind of a weird, little cinematic universe where only the US and Israel can be the bad guys, and by extension, France and the UK, you know, and YadA YadA. But as a result of that, they have this just really strange view of global affairs that literally no one in the countries they're talking about share. Somehow, Russia and Iran and China and Cuba are all aligned in a sort of anti imperial axis because they oppose

the interests of NATO and the United States. And I think that's just so, that's that's patently ridiculous, but it plays a big role in conversations like what's going on in Palestine. Yes, people will invoke, well, why are you giving all this money to Ukraine instead of giving money to people the relief for the Maui fires, or you know,

doing why are we doing medical medicare for all? So it's like it's a convenient because it's the military industrial complex, it's the Iraq War, it's all these things that we as leftists were taught to hate. But it's they're being used for good. It's like America is actually being the arsenal democracy and doing the thing that we did in World War Two that helped the Soviet Union march into Berlin.

Speaker 2

Well, and it's also, I think an important thing to notice when we talk about the it's always framed as the US is giving this amount of money to Ukraine. What's what's happening is we are taking stockpiles of arms we already have worth that much money, and we are sending them there like they're not right like that that is overwhelmingly like the the what kind of aid we are sending over So these are extant weapons that are sitting in the US doing nothing and being like the Bradley's.

We didn't just build a bunch of new Bradley's. We had a shitload of them. We weren't using them anymore because they were not very useful in the conflicts that we were fighting.

Speaker 3

Right that Bradley is Mrs Yeah.

Speaker 13

The United States is like really itching to like need high Mars right now. No, Like, all of this stuff we're sending to them has been mothballed for basically since the Goal War, and people don't understand that.

Speaker 2

It is funny to me to imagine, like, yeah, let's send that stuff to Maui for the fires. That's what they need, is they need long range artillery. That's really gonna that's really gonna help them heal.

Speaker 13

I'm in favor of sending lethal aid to the indigenous residents of Maui, but I think that's it, that's.

Speaker 5

It.

Speaker 2

You talked me into it. And I think we have enough mothballed tanks for both of these causes.

Speaker 13

Yeah, I think.

Speaker 12

For me, the comparisons for Ukraine and Palestine, it started with how it was presented in the media. It just it rought people the wrong way when the Ukraine Median struggle was presented in a certain way and the Palestinian struggle was not, and people can draw some draw a comparison like whiteness and all this stuff. Absolutely, yeah, and I just it got me, really, it really irritates me because it's not like the Oppression Olympics, Like we're not

trying to compare or demonize Ukrainians. We should demonize the media for not representing Palestinians in the right way. But I think that is kind of the origin of the comparison that I saw.

Speaker 2

Anyway, Yeah, and I think that's that's really worth digging into, because there's a couple of First off, it is absolutely an injustice that Ukrainian resistance and that light is seen as inherently just and not just. Palestinian resistance is demonized or often ignored, But like all sorts of resistance by people who are being harmed around the world, it partially is or in large part as a result of like US and other Western countries policies are not seen in

the same light as Ukrainian resistance. I certainly agree with that stance. That's not the refault of anybody in Ukraine. Right, this is we are not talking about a country that

exercises power on the global stage. We are talking about a cash poor nation that has been struggling with Russian imperialism for most of the time that most of the people listening this, actually all of the time that everybody listening to this has been alive in one form or another, right, Yes, And so I think it's perfectly fair to point out the ways in which the media reports unequally on these conflicts, on what's happening in Palestine, what's happening on stuff like Buka,

and on the mass slaughter of civilians in Gaza, right, I think that that is worth pointing out, But it's also not worth blaming Ukrainians over they are not participating in that just by saying, hey, it's bad that our civilians are being massacred by rockets, right and other forms of weaponry. By the way, like that that's not on them, Yeah.

Speaker 13

I think so also kind of flip that on its head. I mean, this part of it is the media narrative. You know, it's easier. Ukrainians are mostly hot white people in the eye of the Western media, and it's easy to cheer for the hot white people who have you know, everyone everyone. A lot of people have been to Ukrainian restaurant, they're familiar with some Ukrainian maybe songs, so they have friends if they live in a place like la or New York, you know Ukrainians, you're familiar maybe even with

some Ukrainian media. And it's and it's kind of like this accessible thing, you know. And also like there's other aspects of it to which you're even stranger, which is that Ukraines produces like a huge amount of the world's fashion models. Like that's a very accessible thing. For people

to get behind in the nice liberal media. And you could see these in these initial broadcasts being like I've never seen anything like this with seeing all these European looking refugees and it's like a right, they're multlearly.

Speaker 12

Like that where they're these are not Arabs like they say it with their chests, you know, like these these are people like us.

Speaker 13

But for the flip side of that is that that leftists are reluctant to be charitable to Ukrainians because they also see them as hot white people who don't need any help. Yeah, and they're unwilling to admit that Ukrainian Ukrainians, like Gosans, also suffer from a settler colonial state as their neighbor with a history of ethnically cleansing and genociding them.

Speaker 2

Yeah, I mean part of the reason for that is that the neighbor that ethnically cleansed in gen well one of them, because actually they had several neighbors ethnically cleansing genocide them. But the Soviet Union like did a significant amount of that during the Holy Dulmar. Now Germans also carried out a massive genocide in Ukraine like and by the way, a huge number of the Red Army soldiers

who successfully helped defeat the Nazis were Ukrainians. As a note, this is you often see this thing where people will point out there were a significant number of Ukrainians that fought with the Nazis, and they tend to ignore that, like, yeah, and there were even more Ukrainians who fought with the Red Army. Like both of those things happened. It was a world war and Ukraine was right in the middle

of it. It's a very ugly situation, and it kind of comes down to this inability of a lot of people to not even nuanced to care about accuracy when that accuracy is not like ideologically convenient, when it points to some of the ugliness and messiness of war. I find that very frustrating. Like I sympathize with because I was reporting on the Syrian refugee crisis from the refugee trail right after actually I was in Ukraine, and it

is unfair that like Ukrainian refugees were treated differently. But the people to blame for that is the news media, not refugees who have lost their homes. In fact, I suspect that a lot of Ukrainians have a different attitude themselves towards the suffering that they witness during that period of time because they've now been through it. It's just like a human thing now, you know what that's like.

Speaker 12

Yeah, I mean as a Syrian person who oh, for the past like over a decade, I really really fucking got on my nerves every time I would see them not talk about Syria, or when they did it was not a good way. And then when they started really embracing Ukrainian refugees or talking about them in a different way, I'm not gonna lie, it made me mad, but not

at Ukrainians. Like I think even now, we should have criticized the media back then, but like they're doing the same thing now with their fucking headlines about Israel and Palestine. It's always how it's presented versus the people it's presenting. Like when someone when some dumb newscaster is standing in front of a group of Ukrainian refugees behind him and he's like, these are not Arabs, these are white people. They didn't say that he did, so I don't know.

Speaker 13

Yeah, And also like I encourage everyone to ask Ukrainian, particularly Eastern Ukrainians' opinions on the Western media and like Westerners in general, because two years into this war, they have a lot of them, and I imagine that they would you would find a lot of the sentiments shared by the Ukrainians. They don't always appreciate how they're portrayed in the Western media, as you know, brave defenders of their country or sook covered refugees coming off of a railcar.

You know, they have a lot of opinions on these sorts of things. They feel patronized, they feel babied in some senses, and they feel like they will be ultimately abandoned by us, which is already coming to pass. Yeah, and as the attention shifts to things like Gaza, you know, it's difficult for them to feel like they have any friends.

Speaker 12

Yeah, no, I want to get into that. But let's take our first break, and yes, we will jump back in and we're back. Okay. We had just been talking about how the support for Ukraine has kind of changed recently. Can you get into that little bit.

Speaker 13

I'm not even necessarily sure that it changed so recently. I remembering over there and it was wall to wall coverage from the moment I set foot from the moment it started to really up until the Oscars and the Chris Rock slap is what we all talked about as last oxers, like this is yeah, the last Oscars and the Chris Rock slap and all the attention that that got. Was the moment that a lot of the volunteers talked about, is the moment where people started to want to forget

about Ukraine. There was still a lot of coverage, but suddenly it was like, you don't have to be obsessed with Ukraine. You know, Ukraine's now a second page story instead of a first page story. That was around the same time that the Russians withdrew from Kiev, So suddenly there wasn't there wasn't this expectation that Kiev was going to fall and the capital be taken in Zelensky would

be captured, and it started to slow up. Even then, you know, the donations dried up, the attention dried up, and by the time I went there in the winter of twenty twenty three last year, it was like people already wanted to forget. I mean, I live in Los Angeles and a lot of people here were saying things like, oh wow, is that still going on? Really nice, well meaning people who knew I'd been over there. They were just like, is that you know, is that still a war going on?

Speaker 7

Yeah?

Speaker 13

Here we are in twenty days. It's going to be two years of this. Yeah, my friends over there are exhausted, and they don't They're now a page eight story.

Speaker 4

Yeah.

Speaker 2

And it's this comes back to like how Americans like to think about conflict. We have an enormous appetite for war and for you know, a particularly what we consider a just struggle for up to a couple of months, right, and then people were very excited when, yeah, the Russians invade everyone. The expectation, both from like military experts in the West and from certainly civilians is that like Russia's

going to crush them immediately, and then they don't. There's this real upset, come from behind, underdog victory and Americans love that, but then like it, it's not a total immediate victory, and in fact, it turns into at this point and really really brutal, ugly slow war of attrition and maneuver, which is like what war is, right, Like that that's how any sort of near peer conflict is going to boil out. And it's not a kind of thing that is resolved quickly, and it's not a kind

of thing that is resolved without cost. And as soon as that became clear Americans, it didn't. It doesn't fit into that like ninety minute Hollywood vision of how a conflict is supposed to go right. There was no The Ukrainians didn't blow up a death star and end it right, like I mean, actually that's not what happens in the movies either, but like it's it's still it was not the quick, clean end that a lot of people were

expecting and hoping for. And as a result, people are like, well, now it's a quagmire and now it's like we have to start looking for some way out of this thing, which by the way, has cost us very little. Like my stance on like when is this over is like, well, I guess when Ukraine says it's over, right, Like if the Ukrainians want to come to the negotiating table and

negotiating into hostilities, then like that's their business. But up until that point, I think the business of the United States is to continue to meet our treaty obligations, which we should we should note like the United States and NATO are obligated to support Ukraine in a war over its sovereignty because they gave up their nukes with that understanding, right, this is.

Speaker 3

What happened when Retail the country.

Speaker 2

Yeah, yeah, we said you give up your nukes and we got your back, like this is this was the promise we made And as far as I'm concerned, that's the only interest I haven't like. My answer is like, how long should we support them? Well, as long as they're fighting, and.

Speaker 13

We've been keeping that promise for the cost of five percent of our defense budget. And like you mentioned earlier, it's it's already stuff that's mothballed since the Gulf War, sitting around waiting to be used.

Speaker 5

You know.

Speaker 10

I mean the idea of giving them F sixteen.

Speaker 13

Every country in the world, practically, at least in the NATO Alliance, it seems like everyone has an F sixteen. I think we're giving them a turkey now too, Like it's not a big deal to give a couple of F sixteens to the Ukrainians or a couple of Bradleys or Abrams or what have you. And I think that people, especially on the right, but also on the left, who get obsessed over the amount of money that we're sending

or the amount of equipment in personnel. Especially when they see these stories about corruption, they don't they don't understand the scale of how small this actually is relative to the United States other commitments, like to Israel, and they get sort of myopically focused on this and they use it as a reason to dislike Ukraine. The Right will never like Ukraine because Zelensky was the guy who made Trump look bad and got him impeached. I think it's

that simple. Yeah, it's wild that like well, also, I mean the Russian interference and stuff. You know, the Republican Party now resembles Russia more. But it's wild that Republicans, you know, thirty years ago were super anti Russia and now the Russia's best friend, and they think Ukraine are sort of Satanist whatever, yeah, to and on corrupt people.

Speaker 2

And it's to kind of emphasize how small five percent of the Defense Department budget is the Pentagon. This is from like a twenty twenty two story. The Pentagon can't account for several trillion dollars in assets, which doesn't mean we don't fully know where they are, but it means that like Pentagon record keeping has sort of like lost

huge amounts of assets over the years. At the moment, like right now, the Pentagon, like as of November twenty sixteen, had failed six audits in a row, and as far as I can tell, I don't think they've actually ever passed an audit of like all of their resources. Like there's huge amounts trillions of dollars in assets that like

we can't fully document. It's it's when you think about like the amount of money that we've actually sent over there as a defense or as a percentage of just like this stuff that we can't fully account for in our militaries, like Arsenal, it's a tiny fraction of that, let alone a fraction of like our Defense Department's total assets.

And it also this gets back to when people talk about like corruption in Ukraine, and by god, Ukraine has a history of government corruption, which is part of what the revolution in twenty fourteen was about, right, But it's particularly silly to complain about that as a reason not to send them weaponry when we know the US Defense Department is massively corrupt, a huge amount of corruption involving not just like not specifically even like military officials, but

involving civilian contractors, involving like the agencies we contract to, involving the money that we've sent over the course of like the eight trillion dollars or so that we've spent on the war on Terror. A huge chunk of that, hundreds of billions of dollars of the money that we spent on the war on Terror is just gone. Billions of it disappeared in the form of cash pallets that we just lost, right, Like, this is the amount of money that it has cost us to support Ukraine in

this war. Is a rounding error of the shit we lost just as a matter of business, Like it just adds like it's like.

Speaker 13

A rounding earrow of like what we gave to Halliburton.

Speaker 2

Yes, you know, yes, to build hospitals that didn't work in Afghanistan.

Speaker 3

Yeah, exactly.

Speaker 13

In speaking of Afghanistan, I think a lot of people look at you, they look at the Afghanistan withdrawal and they think, oh, this is what Ukraine's going to be like. But I think that brings up the point of story, what are we getting for that five percent of defense budget? You know, we gave a bunch to afghan and we ended up getting the same situation that we had when we went in there in two thousand and one, the

Taliban and control. But now they have billions of dollars worth of America the state of the art American military equipment.

Speaker 2

And hundreds of thousands of Afghan people died in the interim exactly.

Speaker 13

And then you contrast that with like, well, what is our five percent of military budget? Get us in Ukraine and you look at what this is doing to Russia. Russia gained abou zero point one percent of Ukrainian territory in the year twenty twenty three, second year of war, and to do that they lost about one hundred thousand soldiers.

Now there's a lot of people in Russia, and that's always been the thing about Russia is that they have these this depth of recruiting that they can pull on, but they're taking out recruiting ads in like Saint Petersburg, in Moscow, and in like the wealthy that they're going hard on, like recruiting from wealthy urban centers instead of sort of the traditional rural areas where they bring in all their recruits, which which is evidence to me that

they're suffering from a manpower shortage in the same way that the Ukrainians are. Yeah, and that's one of the things that particularly frustrates me when people say that we're not what are we getting for our money? Because that's that's it, Like Russia is on the ropes. People just don't want to admit it. People see a slight incremental Russian gain or they feel like there's a standstill on the Ukrainian counter offensive and they think, oh, well, let's just throw in the It's.

Speaker 3

Like, no, can't.

Speaker 13

You can't stop the pressure now, and Pudin is finally kind of ready to come to the negotiating table, it seems, and the Ukrainians, you know, need our help more than ever. And that's kind of the frustrating ourspact. I went on I went on the Hill TV the other day to talk with someone who said, basically, she said, is there any hope for Ukraine? Like very already fatalistic about the whole thing, like are they already on the ropes? And I was like, no, they're not on the ropes. And

this is a narrative that we need to change. We need to understand that there's a very there's a huge difference between what military aid gets us in Ukraine versus what it gets us in Israel and Afghanistan.

Speaker 2

And there's it's also like a significant change in like who is being killed by those weapons, right because even when we talk about the use of like the US use of weapons in foreign countries, we are often talking about these kind of these brush fire conflicts, these insurgencies in which a great deal of the fighting takes place in and around civilian populus. Is And obviously there are Ukrainian cities that have been under siege for quite a while.

But when we're talking about like the Ukrainians firing or giving them him Our systems or giving them Bradley's, we are talking about weaponry that is being used to break fortifications on along a line of contact, which isn't as zero never is a zero civilian casualty endeavor, because those don't exist in war, but is a significantly less involves significantly fewer civilian losses than the kind of wars that we have fought for most of the time that I've

been alive, right, because we're simply not using the weapons are not being used in the same way. Bombarding a trench line is not the same as firing a cruise missile at what you're pretty sure is a terrorist hideout in a city, you know.

Speaker 13

Right, And we have been reluctant to give them any weapons that could do that. I mean, some notable exceptions would be like the strike on the naval command center in Sevestopol. Yes, some other drone limited but but ansoly. Most of those are drone strikes from drone factories where the Ukrainians create their own stuff, And there have been some limited civilian casualties in their incursions into Russian territory because we won't we won't give them any weapons that go into Russian territory.

Speaker 2

Yeah, they give anything they want, yeah, well shit, anything else to.

Speaker 13

Get everything they want.

Speaker 2

I mean, we can't say that's not the case for whoever comes up next, because a number of our advertisements are random, but hopefully not and we're back, all right. One of the things you have to keep in mind when you think about like is what what is the US capable of doing that is positive and what is the US capable of doing that's negative? Is that the United States is fucking massive, right, Our budget is fucking massive.

And we talk on this show, on my other show about a lot of horrible things our government has been involved in, which doesn't which does not detract from the fact that US aid, and particularly food aid, is like a survival matter for tens of millions of people around the globe. Right Like this is one of those things when the Republicans are talking about wanting to like cut all foreign aid that the US gives to basically everyone

but Israel. What that means when you talk about that, you are talking about like starving populations of people larger than most major American cities. Because the US is massive, and the aid that we give is you know, usually not it's not really that significant a chunk of our budget, but for the countries, for a lot of countries that receive it, it's like critical to survival food aid and

medical aid that we've given over the years. And I think that also gets into like one of the things that's important about understanding like how what impact you might have on what's going on in Ukraine. You don't have to if you if you have too much of a bad taste in your mouth, or the idea of supporting US military aid to anywhere. There's a lot of aid that's not military that's necessary right as you do, Charles.

People need medicine right like you are having a positive outcome on like the people in Ukraine, if you are helping to increase their access to food and medicine, and that's not morally complicated. It's always there's always some moral complexity in handing out weapons around the world. Handing out medication is incredibly simple from an ethical standpoint, at least from where you're never a bad guy for giving medicine. It doesn't even matter who it's too, like.

Speaker 13

Well, your bad gut Israel apparently.

Speaker 2

Yes, yes they will drone strike you, but I don't know. I think that like one of the nice things as an American you don't have to. Realistically, the fight over Ukrainian aid right now is primarily something that is happening in Congress, and at this exact moment in that fight, there is very little URI can do. But there is a lot, as you prove, Charles, there is a lot that individual people can do to help other individual people.

You may not have access to a Himer system or any more Bradley tanks to give the Ukrainians, although if you do, please please give them over they'll appreciate them. But there are a number of ways in which you can help, like the actual people suffering on the ground. And I think that that's like, that is right now what regular people can actually do.

Speaker 13

Yeah, I totally agree. I would push back a little bit and saying that there's not a lot that we can do in terms of the congressional fund because I think that people do. I mean, I remember, from back in my time working adjacent to politics, I remember someone told me a statistic where it said it took five phone calls to an office of a congressman for them to rethink their stance on an issue.

Speaker 2

I'm interesting.

Speaker 6

I have received.

Speaker 13

Texts from AIDS to congressmen Republican and Democrat who sit on like House Armed Services Committee or you know, Defense and that sort of stuff, saying like, hey, what's with this Ukraine? Like what's your take on the Ukraine stuff? Should we be giving them all this money? I don't really support it, but you went over there? Do you think they're using it?

Speaker 4

Well?

Speaker 13

And I'm like, holy, holy crap, am I actually getting this text? But yes, absolutely, Like yeah, you need you need to do that, you need to green light whatever, you need a green light to send that over there.

And I think if more people, you know, we're especially now when a lot of congress people don't want to engage with the gaza issue but are looking for like good wins with their constituencies, like get to know your local Ukrainian constituency in your area, start a campaign to go to the regional office of your congressmen, find out which committees they sit on, and and pressure them for sending aid to Ukraine. I mean, that is something you can do. But on the individual level, yeah, you you

can still raise awareness. You can you can connect the decolonial struggle of you Ukrainians to that of Palestinians and other peoples. Someone who does this extraordinarily well is Yulia Timoshenka. Not the Ukrainian politician. She's a young Ukrainian influencer and advocate who went to Nyu Abu Dhabi and sort of got kind of got pilled on the whole Palestine thing and has really eloquently tied the Palestinian and Ukrainian struggles together.

So you can point people towards resources like that and let them know that there are at least some people in Ukraine who see that, who see that connection, and then you can also, of course, you can support humanitarian initiatives in Ukraine very carefully. Please just do so very carefully.

I would say there's a lot of there's a lot of people who went over there and started initiatives that were more or less good, but mostly kind of ineffective because they did not actually engage and include Ukrainians in that process. My role with everything involving Ukraine is just like just to ask Ukrainians about it, Ask Ukrainians what they need, figure out what it is that their priorities are, and make sure that you're including them on your philanthropy

and your charity. They will understand what is most impactful. Yeah, my organization has experienced a lot of success by being entirely run by Ukrainians and being based in Arkiv. And as everyone else is funding and resources have dried up, Mission Harkiv is being handed projects from larger NGOs who

are leaving the region. Because we focus on a local response, it also means that you know, donations to organizations like that go farther because they're going to higher Ukrainians rather than paying for the flights of some westerner to go back and forth, you know, and do a fundraising, you know, coming in from New York and do a fundraising pitch and go back. It's actually going towards This was a commitment I made to myself and my partner and I

went over there. My partner at Mission Harkive was that I was never going to expense like a flight or a meal or anything to Mission Harkive. So you know, all that's come out of my own pocket. And that means that every donation that we have gets to go pretty much directly into our programs. So you can still do that as an individual, you can help in that way.

And the awareness thing is a huge part people are forgetting Ukrainians feel abandoned, like making even just the act of putting a Ukrainian flag on your notes or like tweeting about Ukraine occasionally is seen as such a huge act of solidarity at this stage in the game that the Ukrainians will love you for it.

Speaker 2

I really love that you bring up the kind of pitfalls of and this is not this is Ukraine right now, in particular because it was such a huge international story at the start of the expanded invasion and that always brings out not just grifters but also well meaning people who are going to raise money and try to start initiatives in that country, it may not be doing it

in the most cost effective way possible. And I really like what you said about like the importance of verifying that where you are supporting is not just doing the work, but is like doing the work in the best way possible. And one of the really important things to look at for is like, well, how much money are they spending on sending Westerners to and from this place?

Speaker 4

Right?

Speaker 2

It's one thing if like it's an area that lacks access to medical professionals and they're flying out medical professionals to do like trauma work or whatever, like there's really like that's obviously important, but this is something that like a lot of my friends in Iraq and Syria also experienced, like the frustration of like in GEO workers staying in nice hotels and driving you know, fancy vehicles, where there were local organizations doing things like maintaining refugee camps that

needed the support. I think that's always really important to try to do your research so that the support you give, the awareness you raise, and the money that you donate actually goes where it needs to get.

Speaker 13

I think I mean that opens a whole broad category of maybe this is a subset essay waiting to happen. But I've been playing with this idea of like the idea of conflict vultures, these people who sort of descend on a conflict or a disaster zone for a variety of reasons. You know, maybe it's fundraising. Maybe they work for a big NGO and this helps get them in

the news, so they fly themselves out there. Maybe it's a war and they want to be a hero where they want to present themselves as a hero, and they end up raising a bunch of money for their equipment and stuff, and then stay far away from the fighting line, living in nice hotels like you said. Or maybe it is like you said, well, meeting people who just take up air from the people who need it and take They're like sponges that just absorb all this Western energy

because they're they're a relatable face. And I've encountered all of those people in Ukraine. The reason I went to Ukraine is because I was like, if I'm going to fundraise for this initiative, people are going to give more. They're gonna be more invested if they see an English speaking American talking to them about this stuff. But I came in with the perspective that I can't be centering

myself on this. The idea is to deflect onto what the Ukrainians are doing and elevate their stories rather than saying I'm here, I'm posing with the bach mout entrance sign. I just delivered seven muffins and a generator to like a place that was cleared out by the Ukrainians, you know, six months previously. It's more like, Okay, how how do

you take Americans are very generous people. How do you take American philanthropy, American dollars, American wallets and directed towards the people who are actually going to change, who usually are not Americans. These large NGOs they serve a purpose. The UN serves a purpose. Doctors without borders, direct relief, you know, World Central Kitchen, they do it. They do

a great job in like a specific thing. But a lot of times, if you're giving to the United Nations or you're giving to one of these big NGOs, that sets a fundraiser in the immediate aftermath of something, your money is going to remodel an office in Rome or New York, or Washington, DC, and you're not really reaching the people that you're trying to help. And I think if more Americans understood that, they'd be more responsible with sort of how they spend their money in a philanthropic sense.

Speaker 12

Yeah, Charles, you have been awesome. Thank you so much for coming on and telling us your experience. And yeah, where can people find you on the internet if you want to be found?

Speaker 13

Some I go back and forth. Sometimes I don't want to be found and sometimes I do. But you can find me pretty much everywhere with at Charles McBride. That's McBride with a why, except on Twitter at random. I don't have that handle. And then I just launched a substack, which is I guess Charles McBride dot substack dot com,

and that's where we'll be. I'm kind of shifting towards more long form content to write about my experiences with these things and sort of a more digestible long form wave people engaging with important issues like this Awesoh and if you're interested in the organization I help set up in Ukraine, it is mission dot harkive on Instagram or missionharkive dot com and.

Speaker 12

I can put all the info in the description for yes, listeners and everything, but yeah.

Speaker 10

Sweet excellent Charles. Yeah, thank you, Charles, Thank you, guys.

Speaker 13

I appreciate it.

Speaker 8

Hey everybody, and welcome back to you. It could happen here show about the ways things are falling apart. Well, welcome back to you the listener. Welcome to me, your guest host. I'm Molly Conger, filling in for James for a few weeks. If you're happy to be hearing my voice, feel free to share that feedback anywhere you post online. If you're upset about the state of affairs, I suggest writing your congressional representative or mailing a cryptic postcard to

your local ATF Field office. As your guest host, I'll try to bring you the it could Happen here content you know and love, dispatches from the front lines of our dystopia updates on the people trying to unravel society as we know it, and what's being done to stop the rising tide that threatens to swallow us all. Today I'm joined by a Garrison, and I'm going to tell them a little bit about what's been going on with Patriot Front.

Speaker 14

Hello, Patriot Front, fantastic one of the gayer groups of Nazis operating in the United States.

Speaker 8

It's just guys being dudes, Garrison, You wouldn't understand.

Speaker 3

I certainly wouldn't know.

Speaker 8

You may remember Patriot Front from such iconic moments as getting arrested and mass at a gay Pride event in Idaho in twenty twenty two, having their internal calms leaked repeatedly, nearly constantly, constantly, including some videos of questionably sensual path downs, or accidentally giving several members mild carbon monoxide poisoning by forcing them to ride in the back of the U haul truck. You've probably seen their stickers on a trash can in your local downtown, or maybe you've driven by

a racist banner drop. But when all is sudden done, hopefully you'll only remember them as having been sued into the center of the Earth, which is what I want to talk to you about today.

Speaker 3

Oh all right, that's I I'm unbelievably excited.

Speaker 8

We won't be getting into the sensual pat downs. Unfortunately, this is just court records.

Speaker 14

Okay, Well, I can always I can always find that on telegram.

Speaker 3

That's fine.

Speaker 8

But before we get into who is suing Patriot Front, let's get a quick refresher on who they are and how they came to be scurrying around and matching windbreakers promoting a white ethno state, because I think their origin story really informs the way they've backed themselves into this corner. Patriot Front came into existence in late twenty seventeen when it's splintered off the now defunct neo Nazi group Vanguard America.

The split was months in the making, with a power struggle brewing between Vanguard America leader Dylan Hopper and a young, up and coming fascist named Thomas Russo, who was at that time barely out of high school. In the months leading up to the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville in August twenty seventeen, Rousseau edged Hopper out of his

own organization in what Hopper called a literal coup. By the time Vanguard America was marching in the streets of Charlottesville, Rousseau was not only in control of the group's internal communications, he was calling the shots on the ground. Hopper didn't even attend, and it was that event, the Unite the Right rally, that birthed Patriot Front. In those chaotic morning hours of August twelfth, twenty seventeen, a young man named James Alex Fields Junior joined the men under Russeau's command.

He didn't ride with the core group from Texas in their rented van, which they called the hate Bus.

Speaker 3

Oh my wait, did they really call it the hate bus?

Speaker 8

Rousseau was back then he was sort of Asthmador's protege. I don't know that they'll claim that now, but back then at like this adult alcoholic nazi was mentoring this fascist team like he was. He had just GRADUATEDIZ.

Speaker 3

Many such cases.

Speaker 8

Yeah, so they came up in the hate bus space all right. Mcfields drove here alone. He drove overnight from Ohio, but he was wearing the group's uniform, a white polo khaki pants and carrying a shield bearing Vanguard's logo. He joined in with the members of Vanguard America as they loitered around a public park, chanting Nazi slogans. Field stood shoulder to shoulder and a line of Vanguard members guarding the entrance to the park where the rally was to

be held, preventing counter protesters from entering. A Few hours later, after the rally had been called off by the State police, declaring an unlawful assembly, Fields drove his Dodge Challenger into a crowd of counter protesters, killing heather Higher and injuring dozens of others. In later litigation, Dylan Hopper, responding for Vanguard America, was asked about his immediate reaction to hearing about the attack that afternoon. In the group's discord, Hopper posted,

Commi's died. That's good enough for me. This was, of course, before he'd seen the photos of the murderer mingling with his hate group. In a deposition three years later, he didn't disavow that initial reaction. He said heather Hire's death was a tragedy the same way it would be tragic if a surfer who knowingly entered shark infested waters was killed by a shark, saying it was that woman's choice

to be there. But he maintained that Fields was never a member of the group, that anyone could have put on a white polo and stood near them in the park, that anyone could have handed Fields that shield. His testimony was that Vanguard America didn't actually have membership list, there was no official record who was a member, but he

somehow also knew that Fields was not a member. In that twenty twenty deposition, he claimed that he spoke to Rousseau in the days after the rally, and Rousseau admitted that he had been the one to make the choice to allow Fields to march with them in an attempt to make the group appear larger than it really was, and Fields himself never claimed to be a member of the organization. In his federal sentencing memo, his defense attorney wrote that he'd never been a member of any organized group.

But the damage to Vanguard America was done, and almost every photo of Fields taken that morning, just hours before he committed a hate crime murder that would send him to prison for the rest of his life, he certainly looks like he's with them. After the rally, as Rousseau was still trying to make his way home to Texas, he posted in the Vanguard Discord about the issue with the man who ran into protesters with his car. He was certainly not a member, and none of us know him.

Our shields were given widely to anyone at the rally, and we had many extras. There's no criminal conspiracy, but handing a person a piece of wood and agreeing on fashion. Legally, we have been in contact with folks with legal experience and we're fine as far as PR. Yes, it's bad, But last week they called us evil, white supremacist Nazi killers, and today they're calling us the same thing.

Speaker 3

Shrug it off.

Speaker 8

When members complained that they shouldn't be disavowing the actions of the murderer, Rousseau clarified that quote. The statement never said that what he did was wrong, just clarified that he wasn't a member. People aren't buying it anyway, So neither Rousseau nor Hopper were willing to say what Fields did should not have happened. They didn't disavow the murder.

Hopper's comments seemed genuinely supportive of the murder. They were willing to cheer on the bloodshed, but the way the blood looked on their own hands was going to be a pr problem. Now, for me, the whole Nazi thing is kind of a deal breaker from the start, branding wise, Like, just from the jump, there's a branding issue. There's an eagle, there's a fascies, there's the blood and soil thing. It's just it's not a good look.

Speaker 3

Could you briefly explain what a fascianes is. So it is a bundle of sticks, right.

Speaker 14

It's it's an old Roman symbol, right.

Speaker 8

Right, it comes from you know, the Roman Empire. So it's this very you know, return to tradition. Mussolini brought it back.

Speaker 14

Yeah, and like you can break one stick pretty easily, but if they're all bundled together, then it's then then it's then it's harder to break.

Speaker 8

Apes together strong. Yeah, sorry, just so that the prevy for the new planet of the Apes. But that's not the issue for them in this twenty seventeen rebrand, Right, it's the Nazi thing, not the deal breaker. But it's hard to shake the association with a hate crime. Murder was a member, But the pictures of the murderer holding your logo and standing right next to you are going

to follow you. So just three weeks after the rally, Thomas Rousseau announced in the Vanguard America Discord that he was launching a full rebrand, calling the new group Patriots Front. That s gets dropped later, but Patriots.

Speaker 14

Front, Yeah, that is a way worse name. Yeah, Patriots Front. To say that is that it's really hard to say. They've not possessive either. There's no apostrophe. It's just like Patriots Front. Oh yeah, that's weird. They made a good call, dropped in that.

Speaker 8

S so they really fine tuned it there in the end.

Speaker 14

That was the only the only good thing they've done besides just keep getting arrested.

Speaker 8

But yeah, so the message wasn't changing, The ideology is not changing. The manifesto got a little fresh polish, but the real change was optics. Rousseau recognized the need for broader appeal, for new recruits and for plausible deniability on the group's surface. You can get away with saying a lot more Nazi shit if you put an American flag on the hats and a founding father on the homepage than you can if you're sporting a son and rat and posting Hitler memes.

Speaker 14

Yeah, all of their their kind of outwards visual style is all very like American.

Speaker 3

It is it is, it is. It is American.

Speaker 14

There's a bit of like a military kind of kind of a cleanness to it, but it's very much like they're going full Americana.

Speaker 8

Oh yeah, it's it's it's Americana. It's like Patriot Kitch, right, Like it's a few ten signs away from being a fud rockers.

Speaker 14

Yeah yeah, yeah, but it's it's it's very much not like German Nazi. It's like, right, it's like USA with some like US army signifiers that kind of stuff.

Speaker 8

But the you know, the sentiment behind it is the same. You can take away the black eagle and the fascie like actually they kept the fascies.

Speaker 3

It's just red, white and blue. Now us say all the way, baby, I mean to be fair, money to be fair.

Speaker 14

The United States of America also uses a fascie.

Speaker 8

Right, I'm not like, you know, crying for the sullying of the of the branding of the Night in America. But it's clear what the intention was here. Yes, it's to sort of hide behind that Americana. But in the six and a half years since that rebrand, Thomas Rousseau has maintained tight personal control over the entire group, now called Patriot Front. You can almost read that as a reaction to his first major setback as a white supremacist organizer.

You know, he'd led some smaller rallies in Texas before Unite the Right, but that was his first big day out commanding the Nazi group. Right, And as a result of that day, the entire group was tarnished by the association of you know, in their telling, some random guy who was just near them, We.

Speaker 14

Just happened to hang out with people who like doing murders, you know.

Speaker 8

Right, you know, like it goes like what Hopper was saying in his deposition, right, like, well, she was in shark infested waters. Like, by your own admission, you are the sharks. Yeah, you're saying you are a flesh eating shark. But that's not possible anymore now, right, So you can't just be some guy who's marching with Patriot Front because their events are never announced ahead of time. You have to get the official group merch from the group, after

being interviewed and vetted. You can't just show up and march with them unless you're a member, because only members know when the events are going to be. Yeah, there's no chance that some unvetted hangar on is going to

be standing near them. And that does solve the problem posed by someone like James Fields, but it creates a new problem, real legal liability, by establishing so clearly and so firmly that anybody who's marching with you wearing your hat and your jacket, following your orders through the megaphone. You have established that all of those people answer to you, and you know them, and you approve that they were there. Now you're responsible.

Speaker 14

Yeah, you make the classical mistake of having an actual official members list.

Speaker 8

Right, so now you no longer have the option of saying, well, that guy wasn't with us, We don't know him. And that's where the lawsuits enter the picture. So right now there are three active federal lawsuits against Patriot Front, one in Virginia, one in Massachusetts, and one in North Dakota.

And the underlying actions and some of the claims vary, but all three lawsuits are making the same central claim, a Section nineteen eighty five complaint alleging a conspiracy by Patriot Front and its members to deprive the plaintiffs of their civil rights. And I think it's really interesting. This

is dry as hell. Maybe that's only interesting to me that I think it's really interesting to look at the original context of that statute, right that code section It comes out of the Enforcement Act of eighteen seventy one. Are you familiar with the Enforcement Acts? Going going into deep civil war lore, you know, going back to reconstruction, I'm Canadian.

Speaker 3

I don't.

Speaker 14

The American legal system is but something I've been learning the past ten years. It is by no means the specialty of my research or knowledge.

Speaker 8

Yeah, I'm not like a big Civil War guy.

Speaker 4

You know.

Speaker 8

I have, accidentally and against my will, learned a lot about the Civil War because we've been arguing about these statues for a few years. Sure, but reconstruction I think is really overlooked.

Speaker 4

You.

Speaker 8

In my own education in public school, there was like two paragraphs about reconstruction and then we just sort of like moved on.

Speaker 14

I had like a semester on it. It is certainly one of the more tragic periods of American history, how we seem to almost have figured something out and then it all went down the drain pretty.

Speaker 8

Quick, like we really whiffed it. But the Enforcement Act of eighteen seventy one is also called the ku Klux Klan Act.

Speaker 14

Oh oh oh, yeah, these guys, we're a getting somewhere.

Speaker 8

So when President Grant signed the KKK Act into law in eighteen seventy one, support for reconstruction was starting to falter, and there was genuine fear that the eighteen seventy two presidential election would bring on a new wave of clan violence in the South. And that's starting to sound a little familiar, isn't it. You know, people are getting tired, People are getting tired of being asked to address deep rooted systemic inequalities. There's an upcoming and uncertain presidential election.

There's growing fear of vigilanti violence by roving bands of masked racists. You know, like everything old is new again.

Speaker 3

That sounds like kind of like right now, Yeah, that's wild.

Speaker 8

So you know, there have been other enforcement acts. This wasn't the first one, but the ku Klux Plan Act was specifically tailored to address the question of freelance violence. Right, So, normally, if you are suing over a civil rights violation, there are only remedies available to you when your rights have been violated by a state actor, a cop, a government body, the law itself. The irsu can can really only seek legal remedy when your rights are violated by the state.

This one's a little different because during reconstruction, a lot of that violence, the intimidation, the actions being taken to deprive Black Americans of their newly granted rights, was being undertaken by private actors organizing together. Again, it's starting to feel familiar.

Speaker 14

Yeah, it's not like there could be groups of armed extremists monitoring voting sites trying to scare people away from from voting in an election. That could never happen.

Speaker 3

Now we've learned no lessons.

Speaker 8

Right, So, groups of white men organizing themselves, wearing matching outfits, conspiring to undertake actions to intimidate, harass, and harm the people they believe that are standing between them and the white America they were born to, right. Yeah, So the statute originally provided for both civil and criminal liability for these conspiracies. Interesting, and that first year Grant went hard in the paint with it. Oh like, he he went

full hog like. As soon as he signed this into law, he was red d So in that first year or two after he signed the act, he broke the back of the Klan. Hundreds of klansmen were prosecuted in South Carolina alone. They were arresting so many klansmen so quickly that hundreds of them just went to their local courthouse and turned themselves in because they knew it was coming.

Speaker 3

Oh my god, it killed the Klan. Wow.

Speaker 8

But even before the Supreme Court decided twelve years later that I mean, when it comes to the crime part of this, maybe we should let the States handle it, right, so it no longer has a criminal liability component.

Speaker 3

So this just the civil liability left under that law.

Speaker 8

But even before the Supreme Court made that ruling in eighteen eighty three, the Klan Act prosecutions pretty much ended when reconstruction died, right, it was this brief moment in time when there was any appetite to do anything about this, Yeah, and it.

Speaker 3

Faded out pretty quickly.

Speaker 8

So today it's up to the victim to seek their own civil remedy when they're terrorized by the sons of the clansmen.

Speaker 3

We couldn't reconstruct well, do you know what we should construct?

Speaker 4

Molly?

Speaker 3

Oh god, Yeah.

Speaker 8

Robert told me that if I don't come up with a cool way to throw to ads, he's gonna put me in a dog kennel and air drop me onto an island where successful podcasters hunt people like me for sports.

Speaker 14

So that does sound like something he would say. But we could construct a compelling ad transition.

Speaker 8

Let's take you to the ads, all right, and we are back Garrison, and I'm going to tell you what's in these lawsuits.

Speaker 14

I'm so excited to hear about Patriot Front having to read a niche law.

Speaker 3

Well, the problem is they're pretending they don't have to.

Speaker 14

Oh well, that is also what I would do. I would be like, no, no way, I am not reading that.

Speaker 3

Fuck you. Well, we'll get to that in a second.

Speaker 8

So the first case filed was in Richmond, Virginia, so right here in my backyard.

Speaker 3

All right.

Speaker 8

So, thanks to repeated leaks of Patriot Front's internal communications and documents, we actually have video of them doing what's being alleged in this lawsuit.

Speaker 3

Which is inconvenient for them. It's not great.

Speaker 8

So the suit alleges and the video literally shows that. In October twenty twenty one, a couple of Patriot Front members vandalized a mural in a public park in Richmond. The mural celebrated American tennis legend Arthur Ash. Ash was born and raised in Richmond and started playing tennis as a child in Brookfield Park, which in the fifties when Ash was a child, was one of the few public parks opened to black residents. It was also the park

that his father was the caretaker of. Right, So Arthur ash Richmond public parks, like this is a relationship from his childhood.

Speaker 3

R Yeah, it's like a very important place.

Speaker 8

You know, one of the best tennis players in American history, and he grew up his father worked for the park. He learned to play tennis at that park. That park, Brookfield Park, actually no longer exists, but the park where the mural was installed is in a predominantly black neighborhood.

Speaker 3

Okay.

Speaker 8

In the video they filmed of the vandalism, one Patriot Front member supportively tells two others to quote, get the fucking N word.

Speaker 3

They say it, I'm not, yeah.

Speaker 8

But the N words face as they're covering it up with spray paint and then play. So they filmed this themselves, right, They filmed this themselves and used it in later promotional videos.

Speaker 3

Videotaping this crime spree was the best idea we ever had.

Speaker 14

This is so funny that they just can't stop filming them doing crimes.

Speaker 8

Like they're not just taking notes on the conspiracy, they're filming themselves enthusiastically participating in it.

Speaker 4

Right.

Speaker 3

Funny.

Speaker 8

You know in the promotional videos there's no sound, but in the leaked documents. It's the original uncut video like.

Speaker 14

Once you have like discovery or something. Also, all all all that audio exists, that is, it is the privilege of the court to be able to listen to that.

Speaker 8

Well we have so you know when they cut their promos, you know, they're playing like cool music over it. But in the leaked version that we got from I think it was in the Rocket Chat leaks.

Speaker 3

It was in the second big leak.

Speaker 8

Okay, you can hear them saying, like, you know, get the fucking N words face as they're spray painting over Arthur Ash's face and then stenciling over that with their logo.

Speaker 3

Sure, they're just like, hey, it was us. They're just like leaving it fair.

Speaker 8

And just so we're super clear about this, this is racially motivated. Put that on the tape, like.

Speaker 3

Uh yeah yeah.

Speaker 8

And so this is probably the weaker of the three cases. Right, the plaintiffs in this suit are basing their nineteen eighty five claim that you know, this is a racially motivated conspiracy to interfere with the right of black residents to enjoy a place of public accommodation, right that a place of public accommodation is sort of the legal structure for places where you're not a to fuck with my rights.

In this case, it's a public park. The suit makes a similar and separate claim under Virginia's civil conspiracy law for racial, religious, and ethnic harassment, and unlike the other two suits, this complaint is pretty specific about who the defendants are, because they recorded the planning meeting and the act of vandalism, and because anti fascist researchers have identified

many of the real names behind the pseudonyms. So these plaintiffs name not just the organization itself and Thomas Rousseau, but seven individual members who were involved, and they hope to identify nineteen John Doe defendants in discovery. And so the most recent suit, the third one to be filed. We'll get back to the second one and a second is similar to the Richmond suit because it also arises out of an instance of vandalism. But this one looks a little stronger. I think I should be clear I'm

not a lawyer. I just an enthusiastic consumer of the law.

Speaker 14

Yes, you spent a lot of time reading what I would call extremely boring documents.

Speaker 8

Oh, I love my document. I pay thousands of dollars a year to look at these documents. Oh, it's that drill post like, please, someone please help me, someone who's good at budgeting.

Speaker 14

We will do our best to give you as many documents as you want, Molly.

Speaker 8

These documents cost ten cents a page. I'm a single issue voter on free access to federal court documents.

Speaker 3

Yeah, all my homies hate Pacer.

Speaker 8

So in the Richmond case, we have black residents and a black neighborhood alleging a racial intimidation at a place of public accommodation, a public park. But in North Dakota, the suit is brought by the North Dakota Human Rights Coalition, the Immigrant Development Center, and an unnamed plaintiff who works at the Immigrant Development Center. I mean it arises out of two acts of vandalism at the International Market Plaza and Fargo, North Dakota. The International Market Plaza is run

by the Immigrant Development Center. It's a large indoor market space that supports immigrant run small businesses and has community spaces for the immigrant community.

Speaker 3

Sounds cool.

Speaker 8

Yeah, there's shops and restaurants and after school programs for kids and business development classes.

Speaker 3

I'm sure there's great food.

Speaker 1

Yeah.

Speaker 8

It seems nice, they seem like people. In September of twenty twenty two, Patriot Front trustpassed onto the nonprofits property and spray painted the windows with their logo. And so this was not an isolated incident, right, Patriot funt had targeted other businesses in the Fargo area and the months leading up to this, including a queer worker owned coffee shop.

So the tenants at the marketplace knew who Patriot Front was and what the message is in the windows meant, and they were understandably frightened to have been targeted and fearful that this could escalate, and it did. Two days later, Patriot Front came back to the marketplace and destroyed a mural celebrating multiculturalism, including placing Patriot Front logos over the faces of women in hijobs in one panel.

Speaker 3

Of the mural.

Speaker 14

Yeah, I've had to like call up shops or businesses after they've been targeted or I've like seen I've like seen on telegram like oh, this thing's happening in this area and be like explained to like this poor this like poor employee, like who who this is and why it's happening, and like what to do? Because they're often

very like confused, they don't know what's going on. Yeah, it sucks that which they started like involved just to other people trying to like make just like live out their day, but also like specifically targeting people of color, targeting the LGBTQ community, and.

Speaker 3

Yeah, it is.

Speaker 1

It is.

Speaker 14

It is a fortunately very common occurrence because a lot of Patriot Front's activity, when they're not marching around getting beat up in Philadelphia, are just putting up like stickers and doing graffiti like that. That is kind of most of what they do. Sometimes they'll do like a banner drop or something.

Speaker 8

Well they think about the stickers is I don't know if everyone is deep in lore, but it's required.

Speaker 3

So it's that's what they call their activism.

Speaker 6

Right.

Speaker 14

In order to be a member, you have to post pictures of you putting up stickers.

Speaker 8

Like there are like spreadsheets and documents, and your network director is keeping tabs, and you have to report in every week about what activism you've engaged in, and you have to provide video and photo proof of you doing these acts of vandalism, which.

Speaker 14

Is a pretty smart on Patriot Front's part, because they also sell their stickers so it's it's a great pyramid scheme.

Speaker 3

Yeah, it's got MLM energy. Yeah, I know.

Speaker 14

Uh, Robert Rundo and the Patriot Front guy were like working together on a sticker manufacturing business for a while. I don't think that's working out super well for Rundo, but.

Speaker 8

Uh, yeah, he's some currently awaiting trial in prison, right I believe.

Speaker 14

So, yeah, after fleeing to what is it like Romania for like Belgrade expert, Yes, yes, Serbia, that that's that's where it was.

Speaker 3

Yeah, yeah, yeah, rough.

Speaker 8

But so in this case, you know, it's this is not just stickers, right, the stickers that you can peel off it. You know, you're uncomfortable, you're scared, but you can peel tho stickers off and move on with your day. They spray painted over a mural that cost forty five thousand dollars.

Speaker 14

Oh so well this is this is interesting because I'm not a law expert, but they may be financially liable for that extremely high cost.

Speaker 8

Right, So unlike in the Arthur Ash murral, which was property of the City of Richmond. You know, so the plaintiffs in that suit don't own that mural. They just feel that they've been infringed upon because now they're afraid to go to the public park. In this case, the plaintiff has been financially damaged to a significant degree.

Speaker 3

This mural was.

Speaker 8

They got a grant, they had community input, it was made by local artists, and now it is destroyed. It is a thing of value, it is their property, and the law really cares about property. Oh yeah, now we

have quantifiable damage to property belonging to the plaintiff. After these two incidents, individual shopkeepers had to buy their own security cameras, They shortened their hours because they were scared to be thereafter dark, and the marketplace as a whole actually still operates on reduced hours due to safety concerns. The executive director of the nonprofit had to buy a security system for her home and doesn't like to go to work unaccompanied. I mean, it's genuine fear in this place.

Speaker 4

Now.

Speaker 14

That's the other thing is that these sorts of acts of vandalism come with like an implicit threat of violence that we can get together a crew of five guys wearing masks and show up at this place of work, or we could already be there when you arrive.

Speaker 8

Well, there was the Actually in the lawsuit, one of the paragress in the suit says, you know that the day after this happened, because the day in between the two separate acts, a couple of white guys acting sketchy were wandering around the marketplace taking pictures of people.

Speaker 3

Yeah, I bet yeah, people are scared.

Speaker 8

The marketplace's immigrant shopkeepers and customers absolutely understood the intent of this vandalism, and it was the same message that they chanted here in Charlottesville. You will not replace us, right loud and clear, those in that spray paint. And so their ability to transact business, to use a place of public accommodation, to feel safe in public was taken from them in an organized, pre planned act, arising out

of discriminatory animus. And again that that sort of discriminatory animus clause is important in application of this statue.

Speaker 7

Right.

Speaker 8

So, in the North Dakota suit, they're suing Patriot Front, the organization Thomas Rousseau as its leader, and the regional network director for that area, Trevor Vellescu. And they're also seeking to identify ten John Does in discovery, so they don't know who all of these guys are that are getting sued, but they're gonna find out. And the third suit, Boston lawsuit, is really the most straightforward. A black man got assaulted.

Speaker 3

There's video.

Speaker 8

The video is actually taken by a member of Patriot Front from the Again, it.

Speaker 3

Gets worse, it gets worse.

Speaker 8

So the video was taken by the member from inside the ranks of the march, and it shows members making physical contact with Charles Morrel on a public sidewalk in Boston. So they were up there. It was just before fourth of July. They were marching on Boston's Freedom Trail.

Speaker 3

I think I remember this one, yeah.

Speaker 8

And Charles Morrell was outside the public library. He was a busker, he was playing music outside the library on the sidewalk. And this video didn't get leaked. This video they posted themselves, they proudly on their telegram channel, yep, and they posted it on their telegram channel the day the lawsuit was filed.

Speaker 14

Genius genius move. Once again, the galaxy of brain folks over at Patriot Front just cannot stop putting pretty dog shit electronic music over videos of them doing crimes.

Speaker 8

And so even though I would say if thirteen months after this incident occurred, I'm just randomly posting a video of this happening.

Speaker 3

That's so weird.

Speaker 8

I would say it's probably because you know that you're being sued. But there are a few They have not acknowledged this lawsuit. They don't acknowledge that the suit exists.

Speaker 14

Which which the government loves. When people don't acknowledge lawsuits that are happening to them.

Speaker 3

You can't just like la la la la la your way out of a lawsuit. Red.

Speaker 14

You can try to go into hiding like forever and yeah, we'll see how that goes.

Speaker 8

And so, just a few weeks ago, when Patriot Front was like wandering around in the snow at the March for Life in DC, a reporter asked Rousseau about the incident in Boston. He didn't bring up the lawsuit.

Speaker 3

I wish he had. I would love to get him on tape on that one.

Speaker 8

But you asked him about the incident in Boston, and Rousseau continues to claim that, like, look, we've posted the video and it exonerates us.

Speaker 3

I'm sure, oh, I'm sure it does, buddy. When I watched the.

Speaker 8

Video, I mostly just see a masked gang of fascist using their custom made and branded metal shields to beat a black man who's using a public sidewalk, forcing him into the street and slamming his head into the pole and he had to get stitches. But I guess it's like it's up for the courts to decide if him being in their way was the real crime here.

Speaker 3

Yeah, yeah, they was.

Speaker 14

I mean it's funny because like it's it's it's not funny, But I have I have, I have seen cops before used the exact same justification. Yes, it is different because cops are special little boys because you can't sue them. Yeah, but no, it is funny how much Patriot Front are just trying to act like want to be cops who do graffiti.

Speaker 8

Right, Like if you wanted to be a riot cop, like most cities are hiring.

Speaker 3

Be a riot cop. That's not that hard.

Speaker 8

I've seen a lot of guys doing it that I don't think are capable of much else. Yeah, So in this in the bus in lawsuit, the name defendants are just Thomas Russo and Patriot Front, but they are hoping to identify John doe'es one through ninety nine.

Speaker 3

Well, I only wish them good luck.

Speaker 8

So Garrison, you were saying you know, you can't just hide forever, right, I.

Speaker 14

Usually not, Well, you could try, You can certainly that. Look, you can always try. There are certain people Hidig who I wish only the best. There are many others Hidig who I think are probably bad people. And it's not like I enjoy the violence of the state. But if someone happens to stumble into experience the experiencing the violence of the state will also wanting to wish violence upon me and my friends. I'm not gonna stop that from happening.

Speaker 8

So these lawsuits, right, they got filed, But filing a lawsuit just means you paid a fee to give it to the court clerk. When you're suing someone, you have to serve them with papers. To serve them with papers.

Speaker 3

You have to find them. You have to track them down. And normally that's pretty straightforward.

Speaker 7

Right.

Speaker 8

People have homes, they have jobs, they have routines, they have friends and family. There's places they go, there's places they shop. You can you can find most people because most people aren't hiding, and most people aren't good at hiding. But Thomas Rousseau does not seem to want to be found.

Speaker 7

Now.

Speaker 8

The first suit filed the Virginia suit. They did manage to serve Rousseau at that house in Grapevine, Texas that his father was had owned no longer owns, but he and some other Patriot Front members were living in that house.

Speaker 3

Yep.

Speaker 8

But not long after those papers were served to him there, that house was sold in a foreclosure sale.

Speaker 14

God, I'm sure that house smelled awful. Imagine Oh, it's.

Speaker 8

Like you've never got to feel bad for the foreclosure sale guy. It's like a gym locker in there. Imagine stafving to stage that house for sale.

Speaker 14

The only only worse at smell is inside the Patriot in front U hauls because oh wow, driving six hours in the Idaho the Idaho summer, with like thirty other guys in the back of that truck, it must be awful.

Speaker 8

Do you remember. I think he was in the first leak. Some of the guys were complaining about how when they had to ride in the back of the U haul they were getting sick and like passing out and be like.

Speaker 3

Oh, you're walked in there throwing up ivan just smell everyone else's vomits, but.

Speaker 8

Also like there's carbon monoxide and it's hot.

Speaker 3

Like you're not to be back there. It's so funny.

Speaker 8

But the advice that the advice that Russo gave them, when they were saying like, hey, like we were getting sick back there, like it's it's not safe, like we were barfing and passing out, he recommended that they practice overheating.

Speaker 3

Yeah, gett just get better.

Speaker 14

Get Yeah, like you like endurance tested, just start hanging out in the back of you hauls for fun.

Speaker 8

That's actually not how heatstroke works.

Speaker 14

But no, I'm pretty sure you could just think your way through heatstroke. I look, I guess I think a chat alpha male should be able to sit in a packed truck for seventeen hours be totally fine.

Speaker 8

So the house, the stinky house, sold foreclosed. So by the time the Boston lawsuit process server came to find him there, it was already for sale. Yeah, there's nobody, nobody to serve. So they hired a legal research firm. They sent process servers to addresses all over Texas and they came up empty. So what do you do when a guy who knows process servers are looking for him can't be found?

Speaker 3

Should have served him at that march in Washington, d C.

Speaker 8

Honestly, why were they not mobilized for that, I could have told you they were going to be there.

Speaker 14

I mean, I think that would require some collaboration with like anti fascists, researchers who like know when these things are happening, so like that, I think that's probably why is that that's just a little bit tricky. But if there were more willingness for collaboration, I think that probably could be successful.

Speaker 3

You can find him.

Speaker 8

Right, So, if I were two, for example, file a lawsuit against you today.

Speaker 3

Well, and I what if I did, I'm so innocent if I just never if I just filed my lawsuit, pay the fee to file it, but I just never served you.

Speaker 8

Oh, that's on me. That's my fault. I can't take the necessary steps. My suit's going to get dismissed. But if I'm really trying, I'm hiring investigators, I'm knocking on neighbors doors to ask if they've seen you. I'm looking under every rock for any sign of where you might be. That's different. That's not on me anymore, that's on you. And there's ample precedent for this right and the law is pretty clear. You can't escape being sued by playing cat and mouse.

Speaker 3

The old Tom and Jerry method.

Speaker 8

And I feel like once I start saying things like the federal rules of civil procedure, people are going to turn the podcast turn off.

Speaker 14

That doesn't for us today, folks, that it could happen here, Thank you for listening.

Speaker 8

But so in federal court, the rules allow alternative service by means that are allowable in that state. Right, so even though they're in federal court in North Dakota, they can use methods available in North Dakota courts to serve their defendants. And so in North Dakota, if you've tried your best, you've exhausted the normal means, conducted a diligent search, you can do what's called service by publication, which means you just publish a notice in the newspaper.

Speaker 14

Really, yeah, oh that's I didn't know that. That's interesting.

Speaker 8

And you have to you have to try really hard first, right, they really did try. They hired investigators, their hard servers, like they did, they did their due diligence. Yeah, and so the judge said, okay, you tried your best. Put it in the paper that they got mad. Put it in the paper.

Speaker 3

That they got sued. And so they did.

Speaker 8

They published the notification in a Cass County, North Dakota newspaper for a few months in a row. And so now, as far as that court is concerned, they've been served all right.

Speaker 7

And it worked.

Speaker 3

A few weeks later, they got a lawyer.

Speaker 14

Oh oh, okay, this is this is this is a news to me.

Speaker 8

Yeah, things are moving, things are making. For the North Dakota lawsuit, the two named individual defendants, Thomas Russeau and network director Trevor Bileescu.

Speaker 3

They got a lawyer.

Speaker 8

And his name's gonna sound familiar to you because it is Jason Lee Van Dyke.

Speaker 3

Oh oh well, I yeah, you gotta love Dyke.

Speaker 4

Cus.

Speaker 3

I'm like, what's not to love? What a good kind? Not a good kind?

Speaker 14

Oh wait wait, I'm receiving some special intel. This is not not what I was thinking.

Speaker 3

No.

Speaker 8

Unfortunately, if his name does sound familiar to it might be because for thirty six hours towards the end of twenty eighteen, he was the national chairman of the Proud Boys. But then actually he quit instead.

Speaker 3

Honestly, what are this? What are the smarter moves?

Speaker 8

So he'd represented Proud Boys in various legal actions over the years. He was a member for several years, but as his LinkedIn currently and rather aggressively notes, he is not a proud boy anymore.

Speaker 14

A lot of a lot of people are asking questions about my shirt already, saying I'm not a proud boy.

Speaker 4

Huh.

Speaker 14

Interesting, Yeah, I feel like I actually, I actually, I am familiar with this guy. He was involved in a suit with the group I was looking into a few years back.

Speaker 8

Yeah, he's done a little bit of movement lawyering, so this isn't his first rodeo. And he denies that he is a member of Patriot Front, though he has spoken to the press on numerous occasions claiming to represent various members of.

Speaker 3

Patriot He's non member. Yeah, I mean, I mean sure, I like.

Speaker 8

He has specifically denied allegations that he is Patriot Front user John Texas in the leaked.

Speaker 3

Chats, although oh, okay, well, he.

Speaker 8

Says that he is not John Texas has a lot in common with Jason Leevenda But okay, Jason le Vandyke denies that he is John Texas.

Speaker 3

Okay, well, I'm sure.

Speaker 14

I look, I have no reason to not trust a dyke, so yeah, I'm sure that's fine.

Speaker 8

Yeah, And it's interesting. So he lives in North Texas right where you know. Oh oh, he does home home base for these Patriot Front boys. Yeah, he's never practiced in North Dakota before. He's not barred in North Dakota. Wait what inexplicably? So you know, you have to take the bar exam to be in a state bar normally. Normally to get admitted to a federal court, you have to be barred in that state. North Dakota doesn't require that. Just have to pay a fee. Okay, So it's a

little it's strange. He applied to be admitted to the federal court in North Dakota right around the time this lawsuit got filed.

Speaker 3

Huh.

Speaker 8

But then he didn't actually enter an appearance until the judge said, yeah, they've been served. You can't hide.

Speaker 3

So he didn't know about it, Yeah, he was just yes, I guess.

Speaker 14

It seems like it seems like he knew he was just working with Patriot Front to make it harder to be served. Is Again, that's not a legal claim I'm making. I'm just just making a guess.

Speaker 8

I'm just saying he has never practiced in North Dakota before, but he did apply to be admitted to the court around the time the lawsuit was filed. That's ah interesting, the boss and case is a little wilder. Right, So it's twenty twenty four, we're all online, and it's not actually unheard of to get permission from the court to serve someone electronically if you've tried everything else. Yeah, I've heard of cases where someone got served by a Facebook messenger, which just feels demeaning.

Speaker 14

Wow, that's that's so depressing. Imagine you can send.

Speaker 3

A Minion sticker with it. Oh god, horrible vibes.

Speaker 8

But I need to do a little more research to figure out if this is the first time a federal judge has had to decide whether a gab d M.

Speaker 14

Is legally So you know your joke, there's no way, no, absolutely not. Yeah, okay, well we will we will learn what gab is after I take a break.

Speaker 3

I need to like walk around for a few minutes and just process that for a second.

Speaker 14

You guys, yea, here's here's some ads. I'm just I'm just going to process that for for for a while. All Right, we are back, Molly. I hope that a lot of a lot of our listeners don't know what gap is they should on there, but that means that you have to explain what gab is, which isn't that hard.

Speaker 3

It's just kind of annoying.

Speaker 8

It's just sort of like a less functional Facebook for Nazis.

Speaker 14

Well, I think originally it was Twitter for Nazis, but now Twitter is Twitter for Nazis, but it.

Speaker 8

Has more of a sort of Facebook interface.

Speaker 14

To me, oh, I always I always thought of it as having a way more of like an of like an older Twitter uter face.

Speaker 8

Yet because it has it has like groups and a marketplace, like it.

Speaker 14

Does have groups of market But I think it started as a Twitter clone that started to a Facebook features that's mostly to like.

Speaker 8

Sort of like the evolutionary thing where everything turns into crabs boomers turn everything into Facebook.

Speaker 14

Yes, yes, exactly. It is the Facebook evocation of all social media. I think those changes were made to like to support more like a collaboration between users, because they wanted it to be like a place for Nazis could like also organize. But yeah, it very much started in like what year it was, like twenty eighteen ish, I want.

Speaker 3

To say twenty sixteen.

Speaker 8

Oh, I could pull the incorporation documents, but I think I think it's a little older than that.

Speaker 3

But it wasn't popular until I didn't get a gab account until twenty eighteen.

Speaker 8

It was in the news a lot on twenty eighteen. Yeah, yeah, yeah, mass shooters were using it and then their accounts were in the court documents. But it was already, you know, popular among certain sets.

Speaker 4

It was.

Speaker 3

It was certainly around for a while. Their logo is a frog.

Speaker 14

I'm sure there's nothing I'm sure that's completely normal, but yeah, it started off as just a social media app for Nazis, almost exclusively used by white supremacists.

Speaker 3

It's a free speech platform. It is a free speech platform.

Speaker 14

It was kind of it was, I like Parlor came a few years later, which was more like a maga ish version, like Gab was for like actual Nazis, right, Whereas Parlor you could.

Speaker 3

Find like you know, like like anyone.

Speaker 14

From like mega people, conservative politicians, you could you found a lot of like Proud Boy chapters. But Gab was like, no, you were like explicitly white supremacists.

Speaker 8

There's not a lot of plausible deniability in a GAB account the way there was maybe with Parlor a little bit.

Speaker 3

Now, a Gab is still a thing, I think.

Speaker 14

Uh, I mostly use it to watch the GDL, who posts a lot on GAB. But I think a lot of unfortunately, a whole bunch of people who were on gab are just now back on actual Twitter.

Speaker 3

Or in prison.

Speaker 14

And you know, some would say that those two things and a lot of gob which is not actually true because prison is way worth the same.

Speaker 8

The same posts kind of got them to both places, just different.

Speaker 3

Yes, yes, anyway, so okay, but that's gap.

Speaker 14

I did not know that a future of GAB could be serving some could be serving someone lawsuit papers. That is something I did not know.

Speaker 8

Well, it turns out you can't attach a PDF to a gab DM, so we could run into some trouble.

Speaker 3

Oh my god, this is so dumb.

Speaker 8

So Charles Morrell's lawyers were given permission to serve Patriot Front and Thomas Rousseau via several online means. Right, so in this motion for this this permission for alternate service, they identified two email addresses and social media accounts regularly used by the group on Telegram, Odyssey, Bitshoot and GAB.

Speaker 14

I mean, I certainly would have gone for Telegram Odyssey and bit shoot are like YouTube and twitch clones for nazis. In case the listener is curious, don't go there. Don't not worry, do not go there.

Speaker 3

My god, I I have been on there way too much this week, and I have seen some of the worst.

Speaker 8

Yet it's not good on there. No, it's a process server, right. This This person who normally just like waits outside your work to serve you with papers is like now on gab.

Speaker 4

Right.

Speaker 8

So the process server contacted all of the identified accounts. And so when I was researching this, you know, I was trying to get an idea of how common this is, what the usual means are, And so I was looking through the cited case law and the motion, and one of the cases they cited kind of caught my eye. It's havelish v bin Laden.

Speaker 14

Oh him, I that name sounds familiar. Was was he the one that did that thing around like twenty twenty.

Speaker 3

Three ish years ago? Was it born then? How old I was? I was not? Oh no, I was kidding Jesus. I thought I was just ribbing you. Oh my god.

Speaker 14

Unfortunately, Yeah, Well, it is that bin Laden, right, it is. It is the It is the guy, Okay.

Speaker 8

It's the one, the one you're thinking of. So that's a lawsuit that was brought by families of people who died in nine to eleven. So last year a federal judge in New York gave those plaintiffs permission to serve legal notice to the Taliban via Twitter DM like the Taliban.

Speaker 3

What a time to be alive? What a time to be alive?

Speaker 7

Yeah?

Speaker 14

I mean yes, I the Taliban Twitter account is certainly fascinating. They're they're trying, they're trying to hold the Taliban responsible for nine to eleven.

Speaker 10

Huh.

Speaker 8

I don want to get like deep into the weeds about this particular case, but there's something seized. So like judgments have been awarded, there are seized funds sitting somewhere in the released they want they want this money, right, and so they needed to serve notice to the Taliban that they want this money.

Speaker 3

And so as wild as that sounds.

Speaker 8

There's actually a lot of similarities in the underlying legal logic here. So in both of these cases, the court is pretty specific that they're not just saying like, yeah, just like DM whoever, and it's good enough.

Speaker 9

Right.

Speaker 8

So in both of these cases, the account identified as being appropriate for service is pretty clear that it belongs to the person who's supposed to be served, and that that particular account has been used to make statements that indicate the individual already knows about the lawsuit. So this

DMS the service by ADMA. It's going to be a surprise, right, this isn't going to be the first time you're hearing about this, Like the court knows that you know, okay, which I just need to see the red receipt that you know.

Speaker 3

Uha, got it.

Speaker 8

So in the case of the Taliban, the court notes that the accounts had previously published press releases related to the funds at issue in the underlying litigation. So it's like they they're posting about it. They know they're certainly posting the talent. The Taliban is posting about the funds, okay. So in this case it's Russeau's bravado biting him in the ass, right, and he.

Speaker 3

Loves and he loves posting my God.

Speaker 8

And the judge specifically refers to the fact that they posted the video of the incident the day the suit was filed, which indicates actual knowledge.

Speaker 14

Yes, which is also a very interesting legal move on the part of Russo.

Speaker 8

Like the judge is reading your posts and he doesn't think they're good.

Speaker 3

Oh my god.

Speaker 14

Uh, nothing more scary than having to read out your posts to a federal judge.

Speaker 8

Jesus Christ post every day like a judge is going to read them over your shoulder, right, Yes, So they're just like randomly and for totally unrelated reasons, posting this thirteen month old video the day of the lawsuit gets filed.

Speaker 3

The judgeesn't buy that fast. Again, a fascinating legal move.

Speaker 8

And so back to the Richmond case, right, we're still talking about service. And so the Richmond Keys, because it was filed first, maybe they weren't expecting to get sued. And because more of those plaintiffs were actually identified by anti fascist researchers, they actually had managed to serve most of their defendants. They found Thomas Dale, Nathan Noyce, aident Tradinnick, and Daniel Cherecci at their homes. A private investigator tracks Jacob Brown down hiding at a home owned by his

mother in upstate New York. William Ring was.

Speaker 3

Actually sorry, god, what a bunch of losers.

Speaker 8

But William Ring was actually the easiest defendant to find. His papers were actually handed to someone to give to him. But this person was authorized to receive those papers because they were a corrections officer at the Fayette County Prison in Pennsylvania. Ah Ring was a guest up there serving a sentence for beating a man over the head with a baseball bat wrapped.

Speaker 3

In barbed wire.

Speaker 10

Hmm, curious.

Speaker 8

It was an altercation over refrigerator. It's very unclear.

Speaker 3

Oh, that's so sad.

Speaker 14

I thought it was gonna be like some horrible racist assault, and there could be an element of racism in this.

Speaker 3

I'm not familiar with the case.

Speaker 8

No, don't worry, Garrison. He was there for a second defense that occurred around the same time, but separately separate counties, even where he punched a child in the face after telling her to go back to Mexico.

Speaker 14

Okay, there, we see that. That is what I That's what I was expecting.

Speaker 3

All right, Yeah, that sounds about right.

Speaker 4

Man.

Speaker 14

It does suck that sending Nazis to prison also has so many negative consequences.

Speaker 3

To fix the.

Speaker 14

Furthering of the White Premaces project is really reliant on there being Nazis in prison, and it sucks that that is such an organizational hub of them, because these people should not be around other people.

Speaker 3

Ah man, Yeah, just.

Speaker 8

As an interesting assidne In both of those criminal cases. He hired a guy I've seen before. Very interesting. His name is Josh Smith. He was the lawyer that Matt Heinbach hired to represent him in the sins vy Kesler case a few years ago. Man, he's interesting to see an old friend again.

Speaker 3

Man with the most real name, Josh Smith. Oh, it's because it's not his real name. That's well, there we go.

Speaker 8

He was he was born Daniel Nussbaum.

Speaker 3

Of course, of course he was. I I clocked that immediately. Wow. Good, good for me.

Speaker 8

Yea, he was raised Jewish. But now he's a Holocaust and I are, Oh what.

Speaker 3

This is so sad? Oh my god, he joined to not see gay. Yeah, what the fuck? Oh god, he's like, I have to pick a wider name. Josh Smith. Wow, what a loser.

Speaker 8

He's not a very good lawyer either. His perform his performance in the science case with some of the strangest courtroom behavior I've ever seen. Like the judge had to keep reminding him of like you can't like that's not the law, Like you can't just say stuff.

Speaker 3

I love a courtroom behavior being described as strange.

Speaker 8

Like when the judge has to repeatedly remind you, like how the law works, like how making motions works, like you can't just yell stuff. It was a rough trial for him. His client does oh millions of dollars.

Speaker 3

He's the reverse Saul Goodman.

Speaker 14

Oh my gosh, Jesus Christ.

Speaker 8

Having hired him for his criminal cases and is in prison. But he didn't hire him to represent him in this lawsuit because he didn't get a lawyer and he defaulted. Wow, And so he if you default on a case, it means you're not allowed to participate anymore. And so the case is going to keep going and maybe you get found liable, but like you don't get to participate anymore. So when it's over, if you're liable, like that's kind of fun.

Speaker 3

Fuck you, huh.

Speaker 8

And so Thomas Rousseau, Jacob Brown, and Patriot Front are also defaulted in that lawsuit. But the other guys, the other guys got a lawyer. They hired another guy we've seen before. His name is Glenn Allen. He's a Maryland based attorney who lost his job as counsel for the Baltimore Police Department after the SPLC identified him as a longtime member of the old school neo Nazi group National Alliance.

Speaker 14

Wow huh. Curious said that the police would have an Uzi lawyer.

Speaker 3

That's weird. Surely there's nothing to interrogate there.

Speaker 8

No, there's nothing weird going on in Baltimore at the police department at all.

Speaker 14

It is certainly funny that they just hired the old police Nazi lawyer for their Nazi club.

Speaker 3

Lawyer.

Speaker 14

Who's Who's someone who's been fighting from the police from being a Nazi.

Speaker 3

So he's been keeping pretty busy the last few years.

Speaker 8

He's spent a couple of years trying to sue the SPLC for saying true stuff about him being a member.

Speaker 3

Of National Alliance.

Speaker 8

It didn't work out, didn't work out, and he currently represents Warren Baylong in a doomed appeal of a previously dismiss lawsuit against the City of Charlottesville, who're failing to protect his right to have a good time at Unite the Right.

Speaker 7

Uh.

Speaker 3

Well, it's so.

Speaker 8

It's sort of I don't know, it's like feels a little slapstick, right, Like we're just like throwing characters in there we've got We've got the formerly Jewish Holocaust deny your Nazi. We've got the guy in prison for punching a little girl. Oh, the girl he told to go back to Mexico is Puerto Rican. I don't know that that matters to him. But she, she can't, she can't go back to Mexico.

Speaker 14

Not being racist. Challenge level impossible.

Speaker 3

We're just like throwing characters in here. We gotta know it is. It is very curtoonish. Yeah, but here we are at the end.

Speaker 8

Right, I've taken up a lot of your time to take care of us and telling you my little story. But what happens now? Right, there's three live cases. They're starting, they're starting to crawl forward now that the judges agreed that you can serve them. I'm so excited for discovery. My god, it's gonna be a treat. It's for me anyway, I'm getting the documents now. Obviously, the plaintiff's goal here is recovery of damages. That's what the law allows for.

They can they sue because they want to recover damages, and I wish them well in them. I'm not like holding my breath. I think we can get some idea of what to expect here by looking back at the Signs by Kessler lawsuit against the United the Right organizers. It took four years to get to trial. Discovery was stymied by guys dropping their phones in toilets, So we're.

Speaker 3

Just showing up.

Speaker 14

I'm sure a lot of what these lawyers are doing are collaborating with defendants to make as a little come out and discovery as possible, because that is beyond the actual court case. The thing that could actually be most damaging to them is discovery like that, that is the actual thing. So I'm sure they're using all this extra time when they're avoiding recognizing the lawsuit to try to tidy up any dirty laundry they may have in a semi legal fashion.

Speaker 8

Well, they can't do that, and so I'm not going to accuse anyone of a crime. Right, destruction of evidence is not allowed. It's called spoliation. Right, So once you have actual knowledge that you're being sued, you are no longer allowed to destroy anything that might be discoverable.

Speaker 3

Do people still do it? Sure? They always?

Speaker 2

No?

Speaker 8

Am I implying that anyone is committing a crime at this juncture. Legally, no, we'll see. But you know, looking back at scigns, I don't think anybody's going to squeeze a few million out of any of those guys, right, Like they were found liable, but they're not going to pay right, And Thomas Rousseau started running his club for friendless boys right out of high school. He doesn't have a job, he doesn't have assets. He's not going to pay anybody any money. But what it can do is

slow them down. They have to get lawyers, they have to show up in court, they have to participate in discovery. We've already seen plenty of leaked coms and internal planning documents, but now those documents and more will be entered into the court record.

Speaker 3

Right.

Speaker 8

So you know, researchers like you and I, we put out information all the time and people see it and it makes a difference. But when something comes in with sort of the impromatuur of the court's legitimacy, like once you put a bait's number on that bad boy, they could put it on the news, the real news where normal people see it.

Speaker 14

Right, yesh, your like niche, not your niche like no blogs the site that like twelve people check it.

Speaker 8

On right, So like your mom watching Matt Out is going to see this, where like she's not reading Unicorn Riot. So this will put this information in front of more people, will have more legitimacy. But I think the biggest impact this is going to have is on the willingness of potential members and current members to participate.

Speaker 3

Right. Yeah, it makes things way more risky for people wanting to do this sort of stuff.

Speaker 8

Like, maybe you're gonna think twice about your group mandated racial intimidation now that you know you.

Speaker 3

Might have to pay for that.

Speaker 8

Yeah, you know, maybe joining looks a little less appealing. You know, it's hard to be optimistic about relying on the courts to meaningfully undermine white supremacist organizing.

Speaker 3

Sure, but it's worth a shot to gum up the works with whatever tools you have.

Speaker 14

Absolutely, I may not believe in like the law system TM as this as this like universally good thing, or even like a like a like a valid thing, but I'm certainly willing to have it severely inconvenience my ontological enemies.

Speaker 3

Like is it the best solution?

Speaker 1

No?

Speaker 3

Is it a solution? Maybe not at all, But it's worth a shot.

Speaker 8

It'll be you know, I'm gonna enjoy reading the documents either way.

Speaker 14

Absolutely, No, that is. I am extremely intrigued to see what will come out uh in discovery, and I wish these people only the worst. So well, Mollie, that was that was fantastic. That was extremely informative. You know, I always think it's impossible to find new ways to laugh at Patriot Front, Yet here here we are.

Speaker 8

Imagine opening that DM. I wish they had record, they record everything. I wish they'd been recording that.

Speaker 14

God, that'd be funny. Yeah, imagine getting served via GAB. I would just get you know, I I shouldn't say that anyway. Well, where can people find you online, Molly? Besides on our show?

Speaker 3

Now, I know, I'm very excited to be here.

Speaker 8

You can find me on Twitter at Socialist dog mom my name I chose as a little joke before I realized it was going to be my job.

Speaker 3

That is. That is the same That is the same thing with my Twitter presence. So we are we are in the same boat there.

Speaker 8

Yeah, you mostly just find me on Twitter. You can find me on my my ghost newsletter. It's like substack, but there's less nazis there. It's called the Devil's advocates. There's a link to it on my Twitter I post about what happens when you take white supremacy to court.

Speaker 14

Fantastic. Well, thank you so much, Molly. We will we will talk again soon to learn about I'm sure even even new and more more ridiculous things that you have stumbled across by reading these documents. I am too adhd to look.

Speaker 3

At it only ever gets worse, Garrison, Welcome to the very special lunar New Year's episode of vikadap Here. I'm your host, Mia Wong, and today we're talking about China, and more specifically, we are talking about the Chinese state and the persistent question that haunts American national security experts

and leftists on social media alike, is China maoist? Now, if you, gentle listener, are not embroiled in a kind of running turf war with American China watchers like I am, you may rightly be asking, wait, what people actually believe this? And the answer, unfortunately is yes, yes they do. And those people get to write in major media outlets. Here's the New York Times how she returned China to one man rule. For decades, China has built Guyard rails to

prevent another Mao. Here's how Hijimping has dismantled them and created his own machinery of power. Here's also The New York Times. This one, I guess technically is from the opinion section. But Uh Xixiping is the second coming of Maosee Dung. Here's the Wall Street Journal. China wants to move ahead, but Sijiping is looking to the past. As China's leader embraces more elements of Maosee Dung's rule, It's

people are confronting more uncertain future. Lest you think this is purely an American phenomena, here's Al Jazeera, which is funded by the government of Catter is Xijimping China's new Mao Ze Dung, which she casting himself as a twenty first century Mao. China risks arbitrary rule. Here's foreign policy

the Maoist roots of She's economic dilemma. In contrast with Dang, she has embraced a distinctly Maoist socialism that emphasizes personal sacrifice for the collective good, HARKing back to the Cultural Revolution of the nineteen sixties and seventies. The British, of course, are also not immune to this Mao derangement syndrome. I guess I would call it Chi Jimping's pilgrimage to Red Mecca brings back the Mao factor. So you know, this

is a very, very common sentiment. It's been a very common sentiment for most of the last dec I haven't even done some of the most common ones, like you, if you expand a little bit out from just Xijimping is the new Mao ones, you get a lot of like Xi Jimping is the most powerful leader since Mao, which is kind of true. And I think this is part of why this sort of strategy works, because people do not want to actually differentiate between different kinds of

authoritarian systems. There are many, many different kinds of dictatorships, and people are just loath to actually look at the differences. And you see this. This is not just the sort of American media class thing. You see this in political science literature all the time. Political science literature, especially in the US, has this tendency to divide the entire world into this sort of neat classification of dictatorships and democracies.

And as a product of this, I have had to read some truly truly appalling articles that were published in peer reviewed journals. On my absolute I don't know if favorite is the right term or the most cursed one that I ever saw was it was an article about like the read the quote unquote resource curse and this argument about whether like having a bunch of oil means that you were inherently gonna have an authoritarian government or whatever.

So they have this chart that's supposed to be tracking like the quote unquote time to a democratic transition of a bunch of non democratic societies by like just how much how much natural resources they have. Now this this chart has in the same category Saudi Arabia, a theocratic monarchy, and also Hoaxayist Albania, a country whose political line was that Mao did it Mao hard enough. And these are just being treated neutraally as the same type of governments

because it's not a representative democracy. North Korea is another good example of this. You see people in the US calling North Korea hereditary monarchy like all the time, and it just isn't. Leadership of the party state passes between members of a family. But that's not actually enough to make something a monarchy unless you're prepared to argue that, like, the US is a monarchy because we had two Bushes

as president. Now on the grounds that that's extremely funny, I'm not wholly unsympathetic to that argument, but it's not. Calling the US a monarchy because of the two Bushes is not a very serious academic argument. It is just a joke. And that's I think, how we should be treating people, like people calling North Korea a monarchy because it's not a monarchy is not just there's a guy who's in charge and it passes to another person who's related to them. It's not just that there's someone who

you could call a king. There is a whole political system beneath it, right, there's a whole network of like princes and courts and land titles and inheritances and who when who doesn't have royal blood, and there's there's you know, there's a whole you know, and the economic system of a monarchy as has changed over time. Right, monarchies are very old. You know, we now have like capitalist monarchies

like the Saudis. You know, we've had feudal monarchies, We've had sort of pre feudal monarchies, but you can't simply reduce monarchy to one guy in charge. That is absolutely absurd, But people just do this all the time. Now, North Korea is organized along the lines of a party state, where this is, you know, a sort of shortening of one party state. Technically speaking, there are actually other parties in North Korea, and this is true of China as well,

but they don't really do anything. And this is not the episode where I'm going to have to try to explain the difference between the United Front and the United Front Works Department. That's another time. But they are functionally one party states. There is one party that actually does the ruling, and then there's a couple of other parties that keep around for appearances, who might do consultative stuff.

But even in terms, even knowing that something is a party state doesn't actually tell you a huge amount about how that system actually functions. And this is where we come to the core elements of today's episode. How does the modern Chinese state operate and how is it different from previous iterations of the Chinese state. So to answer this question, we need to start. We need to start with the origins of the party state itself and the party state really in the sense that we're dealing with

is born with the Soviet Union. Well, I mean, I guess it technically creates the Soviet Union a little bit, but it's it's born it's bored of the October Revolution and the Bolshevik taking consolidation of power. On the other hand, you know, party states are not built in the image of Lenin. They're built in the image of Stalin. And the thing that makes you know, sort of like what the party states that come after it, what makes them function is the way that sort of Stalin consolidates power.

And Stalin consolidates power by using the rules of the Bolshevik Party to maintain control over members of the state apparatus, even though technically speaking he doesn't he doesn't have like you know, he'd keep be doing these doesn't technically have the formal authority to do as a member of the government, but he has the authority to do as a member of the party. And this is how Stalin consolidates his power and sod walls out Trotsky et etc.

Speaker 6

Et cetera.

Speaker 3

However, Comma, this is where people make mistakes when when they're trying to sort of understand what Stalinism was, which is that they make this mistake of looking you know, of kind of projecting back the later Soviet Union on you know, onto sort of like nineteen thirty's Stalinism, and the mistake that they make is the assumption that Stalinism is purely a bureaucratic doctrine, right, It's purely about season control the bureaucracy and using a bureaucracy to consolidate power.

And that is just not true. Part of Stalin's success and you know, as bleak as that like success is. Part of what Stalin does is mobilize masses of people against parts of the party and in parts of the state bureaucracy that oppose him, that you you know, did do things like denunciations to like you know, and to weaken their bureaucratic power. And this means that Stalinism is not a pure politics of state bureaucracy the way that

sort of later Soviet governments are. It's a combination of bureaucratic power and also the direction of mass mobilization, of the mobilization of large numbers of people to go do a thing towards the end of consolidating power. This interplay the control of bureaucratic power checked by mass popular and mobilizations is the characteristic element of Stalinism. Both of these tools, both the bureaucratic apparatus and mass mobilization, are used to

maintain Stalin's personal power. Now, Maoism, for all of its claims to be the direct ideological air of Stalin is, Maoism is Sallanism are not the same thing in sort of like Mao era or China. And you know, you can trace this towards from sort of like Mao's insurgency era through the time he's in power to the end of the seventies. During that period, China is, if anything, even more prone to mass popular and mobilization as a strategy.

Some of this is ideological. Maoism is to a large extent a kind of internal critique of Stalinism that you know, I mean, like so people in like you could argue about, you know, how good were the intentions of the people who are in charge of the Chinese Communist Party in like the twenties and thirties, Right, But they're not They're not stupid, right, These people are smart. These people understand that there are a lot of problems with the Soviet system.

These are people who watched a bunch of their comrades get murdered because the Soviets fucked up. So these are people who understand the threat of bureaucrat as a to a revolutionary movements and the formation the potential formation of a new ruling class composed of sort of like management

and bureaucratic cadres. But on the other hand, because it's an internal critique of Stalinism and not like an external critique of Stalinism, Maoism is utterly unwilling to try to solve these problems by actually giving like workers or peasants, like any kind of autonomy or democratic control over anything, except for like the most trivial minutia of like shop floor bullshit. And the result of this is that you know, you can't defeat the bureaucracy with democracy, so what do

you how do you actually deal with it? And the result is what's called campaign style mobilization. These are mass mobilizations of extraordinary large numbers of people to do it, you know, to to do a task right. There's a lot of different sort of things they try to do with this. Sometimes they're tried they're used for economic ends. This is like the Great Leap four, which is this mass mobilization of people to increase productive capacity. It is

a fiasco. Now, part of this Auso was political, right, Partly this is MAO trying to use mass mobilization against the bureaucracy in a way reminiscent of Stalin, but at

a much much larger scale. And the other you know part part of what's going on here is that the bureaucracy of the Soviet Union is much stronger than the bureaucracy of China, right, because you know, the Bolsheviks kind of have a state like bureaucracy sort of intact that they're able to sort of graft themselves onto China like doesn't have like a functioning government at all, Like there's no functioning central state in China when the Maoist eventually

like knock off the Nationalists. So you know this this this always means that the level of bureaucratization is lower in China, but you know, it's still it's there's still that's still like the state building process is still one of the things that Maoists are trying to do. And this is you know, this is sort of what Mao

is tending to check. But this doesn't work. The Culture Revolution ultimately fails, and part of its failure is that, you know, Okay, so in order in order to like stop the dread specter of like democratic election of factory councils and shit mao like cobbles together this coalition of soldiers like loyalist red Guard factions and some of the pre existing bureaucracy. And these people are these are people who end up running the country through the seventies, and

that is just another bureaucracy. And through this whole period, China continues to get more and more bureaucratic. Now, this is the most cliche thing that you can possibly say, but unfortunately I do have to say it. The Culture Revolution had a massive impact on subsequent Chinese policy. Every Chinese leader from Danzhou Ping on, including Xiji Ping, and this is something that is not very well covered in the American press, but every single one of these people

agrees that the Culture Revolution was a mistake. And you can see the results of this analysis in how the min modern Chinese state mobilizes resources. Now, do you know how you can mobilize resources. It's buying the products and services contained in these ads. We are back. I don't know why I'm saying we. It is kind of just me and you the listener, But I guess, I guess,

I guess that's technically plural. So let's get into how the modern Chinese state is very, very different from the previous kind of Chinese state, right because, you know, like the Mao era, for everything that goes wrong with it, right, for all of the reality that is an absolute disaster, is based on in a lot of ways, what we would call grassroots style organizing. Right, It's based on getting

a bunch of people to go out and do a thing. Now, the modern Chinese state doesn't do this in the same way. The closest thing that they have to sort of like Maoist mobilizations are you know, there is still a thing that's called a campaign stylen mobilization, but it's not the same thing at all as the Maoist system. So let's ask the question, what the fuck is campaign style mobilization? So I'm gonna go to the academic literature on this.

A group of professors, writing for the journal Public Administration Review, in a very colorfully named article called campaign Style Enforcement and Regulatory Compliance describe it. Thus, following the literature, we define campaign style enforcement as a type of policy implementation involving extraordinary mobilization of administrative resources under political sponsorship. Now, this definition is very interesting because if you look at what is being mobilized here, right, it is not masses

of people. You're not trying to do mass popular mobilizations. You're mobilizing administrative resources. And this is something that becomes very clear the more you look into the sort of literature here. I'm going to quote from a piece called Revised Blue Sky Fabrication in China by Yongdongshen and Anna l Ahlers during the Mao era. This is campaign style mobilizations aimed at nothing less than mobilizing society as a whole.

While when they occur today, political campaigns are usually foremostly addressed at the state apparatus i e. Especially party and government organizations, at all levels of the political hierarchy, and ultimately at cadres in other words, the implementers of the policy goals at stake. Accordingly, Elizabeth Perry has called this

transformation quote from mass campaigns to managed campaigns. Moreover, contemporary campaigns, or better campaign style politics mainly take the form of a disciplinary, supervisory and sanctioning campaigns such as anti crime campaigns or the recently reinforced corruption campaign or be regulatory enforcement or policy goal attainment acceleration campaigns. So Okay, that's kind of a lot, but I think I think it's worth actually, you know, taking this in a little bit

of detail. That same article defines like the characteristics of what campaign style, a campaign stylen mobilization is. So they have a defined goal, they have political sponsorship, there's a high degree of urgency, there's a defined period of time, tightly coordinated operation, the pooling of extraordinary resources, and public involvement.

So that article of the one about blue sky fabrication is studying the twenty sixteen G twenty meeting in Hangzhou where the government sets out to make sure that there is actually like a blue sky for the event. Now, this is a massive undertaking because Chinese air pollution is fucking atrocious. This is something that I might view another Fall episode about this at some point. Chinese air pollution is unbelievably bad. It kills unfathomable numbers of people every year.

It's gotten a little bit better since I was last there, But like when I was last in Beijing, like I didn't fucking I only saw the sky one time in the time I was there, because and that was only because it rained. And so after it rain, the sky was blue for like a few hours in the small just like consumed it again. So in order to make sure that there was like a blue sky for pr purposes for this G twenty meeting, because China wanted to sort of show off, there was a massive, massive deployment

of resources. And this becomes one of the sort of campaigns down mobilizations, and these mobilizians. You know, they may not be sort of MAOIs style mass mobilizations of like getting people to go do the thing, but they are massively intrusive. They include things like shuddering fact is moving millions of people, restricting like who can drive them what days, like, restricting whether or not you can like use like cooking stuff in your house. But Comma, we need to look

at how these things actually happen. So the way that these campaigns start basically is for for the large scale ones, you have mobilization that flows basically down the lines of the state. Right, they start from the federal governments and then they go to local governments and regional governments and implementation you know, for sort of scientific stuff.

Speaker 4

Right.

Speaker 3

So if you look if for you know, going back to the sort of example of the G twenty for you know, in order to do the scientific coordination for it, you get a very very broad, sort of broad reaching like coalition or coordination between scientists at universities as well as at research institutes and government agencies, and you're pulling them all together in order to produce like, like I don't know, you're like air quality measures, right, And these

efforts also can very rapidly fold in the governments of other provinces. So what does it actually mean in terms of how these mobilizations work. What it means is that mobilization is a way of moving around different state and sometimes just kind of pseudo nonstate actors like universities and research institutes. It's a way of moving those resources around in such a way that you can accomplish a thing. Now.

One of the kind of defining characteristics of a lot of these campaigns, and not all of them, like the anti corruption campaigns obviously are sort of different, but a lot of these campaigns rely on scientific and technical mobilization. Both in the sense of what resources they're moving, right, you moving scientists around, but also in terms of public justification.

And this is also something that's very different, Like there is ideological justification going on, but like in like a Maoist sort of like like a high culture revolution like period or even greatly forward period, you're mostly using sort of ideological like direct ideological motivation to get people to go do a thing. Here. It's very technical, it's very scientific,

it's very technocratic. And one of the products of this, one of the products of sort of how technocratic everything is is that and this is something Shen and Ahlers are very clear about. There is like no there's no public comment here, right, Like the way these campaign mobilizations work is the state tells you what you are doing, and you are not telling them back like anything. Like you are not negotiating with them, you are not in a dialogue, you are not submitting comment. They are just

telling you what to do. And this goes from like regular people all the way up to like corporations, right, Like even large corporations. A lot of times with these like campaign style things don't get a like negotiate a deal or whatever the fuck it it just sort of happens. Now. You may have noticed in the original one of the original descriptions, I was talking about one of the def things they have as the definition is public mobiles is

mobilization of like the public. But we need to be clear about what that means so that it doesn't get confused with like maoism. So what do we say, there's mobilization of the public. It's stuff likely. So during the G twenty campaign, there were like they would the CCP would like have old people volunteer to like walk around their neighborhoods and like snatch on anyone who was like using their cooking stove. So like that's the kind of

mobilization we're talking like. These these are not like these are not like Red Guard tribunals, like dragging people out of their houses. This is like a seventy year old's person incredibly nosy seventy year old going like, ha, this person using their cooking stove. You know how you can get a cooking stove that you can actually use? Uh, maybe these products and services I don't know if we're sponsored by cooking stoves, but you know we could be.

There could there could be a cooking stove, product and service out there waiting for you and we're back. Now, we should also look more at some of the methods of how this stuff happens. Right, So one of the things that's happening is part of this campaign is part of the part of the plan to reduce pollution. Is they need the Chinese government wants to move a bunch of people out of out of the city right now, A Maoi style thing would just tell the people to

fucking leave. The way that the way that the modern Chinese government does this is to send people like basically free travel vouchers. Shennon Ayler's report, the value of these vouchers is more than one point five billion dollars, So like that's dollars, right, that's that's like, so you know this is this is these are very expensive campaigns. But but you know this is the way that the Chinese state moves in a lot of these cases, right when they're trying to move when they need to move a

bunch of people, they deploy vouchers. So some of these campaigns are using even more like technocratic means to get things done. So looking back at the article of campaign style enforcement and regulatory compliance, we find examples of what

is technically campaign style mobilization. Okay, quote, for instance, the central government either waived the loan interest for corporate spending on basically these like desulfurization things to make industrial like exhaust not have sulfur in it, or cover these expenses using central environment central environmental funds. In addition, an innovative green electricity policy offered that point zero zero two three cent price premium per kilowatt hour to power plants that

installed one of these systems. So this is like exactly the opposite of how a booist campaign would do this, right, Like they are these factory people are getting like price subsidies, and like they're waiving the interest on loans. Now, we've been focusing on campaign style mobilization because those are the most sort of extraordinary kinds of mobilization. But most policy isn't even implemented by campaign It's implemented by normal biaucritic processes.

And this is even less booist than the sort of campaign stylen mobilizations. Now, most people, a lot of people who describe China as booist are describing their oppressive apparatus. But here they have things exactly backwards, right, Contrary to the government and socialist period, which was sort of governed by mass mobilization, the modern Chinese government is almost pathologically adverse to anything that even smells like mass popular mobilization.

And this isn't to say that China doesn't have protests like it does. There are protests in China, but comma like a lot of these. You well, there are protests like there are like ecological like Nimbi protests. There are like real estate there's a lot of real estate protests, and some of those, some of these are allowed. There are protests, one of the very common forms of protests

against not getting paid by your boss. But even attempting like and most of these protests aren't like you just aren't really anti government, right, Like they're not sort of like they're not calling for the downfall of the regime or whatever. They're like pissed off about a corrupt local government. But even attempting to documents, all of the protests that happened in China in a given year canon has landed people in prison. So you know, the state is not

super happy about this. And if we look at what happened to mass protests in twenty twenty two. They were brutally suppressed, and you know, the sort of anti like then, even things that weren't even really that big but we're kind of antecedents of ists that attempted to use sort of maoist politics were also unbelievably quickly like stamped out.

Speaker 4

Right.

Speaker 3

There was the oppression of the student workers movement in late twenty tens. On the student sort of worker like maoist movements. The Chinese state does some sort of like limited mobilization online, you know, in terms of sort of like they have this like pr strategy thing overseas of like wolf warrior diplomacy or whatever. It's unbelievably cringe. But even then, these are not even close to the kinds of mobilization the state and the party could, like nationalists

mobilizations they could unleash if they wanted to. And this is because instead of working through mass popular mobilization, the state isn't maoist, and because it's not maoist, it works through the bureaucracy. Policy implementation works by going from the top, and then if they go down to local government's local government respond it goes back up to the top again, it comes back down and the policy gets it implemented. Right, Like you know, when when there are mask like you know,

mass campaign style things, they're not. They're not mass mobilizing people. They're mobilizing research institutes. They're mobilizing like government bureaus. They're they're they're shifting bureau and technocrats around. Now, I think I think there's a lot of reasons for why the Chinese governments is sort of like pathologically adverse to anything that even sort of smelled like kind of smells like male style politics.

Speaker 5

Right.

Speaker 3

One of them is that, you know, these are we talked about this before, but like these are people who a lot of these people lived through parts of the Cultural Revolution, like they saw really fiascos emerge out of this stuff. But you know, the other thing that they're that these people are afraid of is that so you know, when I say these people were around for the Culture Revolution, like these people saw the Chinese working class take the

city of Shanghai nineteen sixty seven. Right, this is all and this is part of the reason why Tien then rattles them so much because they you know, they nearly watch the working class take another Chinese city, and these these are people who have a you know, and I think understand this on a more visceral level than most

other political leaders. Understand that if they if they don't correctly manage situations and like stamp up popular mobilization like they could, you know, there there are worlds where they fucking wake up, thet dragged out of their houses and the Chinese working class hangs them from lamp posts. Right, that's a real threat. And this is part of why you know, they're using something that's something that's called neoliberalism, right,

the disenchantment of politics. They this is, this is why the state, even when it's doing repression, operates through sort of technocratic and bureaucratic means. Now, journalists resort to calling this maoism because they're lazy hacks who are also racist. But you know, we we can see pretty clearly by actually looking at how the state functions that this is not maoism. Maoism is built on mass popular mobilization. The modern CCP is built on stamping out mass popular mobilization.

This has been niked, happened here, Yeah, happy to lean your New Year's everyone.

Speaker 2

Hey, we'll be back Monday with more episodes every week from now until the heat death of the universe.

Speaker 3

It Could Happen Here as a production of cool Zone Media.

Speaker 12

For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website coolzonemedia dot com or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can find sources for It Could Happen Here, updated monthly at coolzonemedia dot com slash sources. Thanks for listening.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file