A Bow Hunter Finds Bigfoot - podcast episode cover

A Bow Hunter Finds Bigfoot

Apr 26, 20261 hr 4 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

This is the third episode in the five-part series The Corridor, tracing five independent encounter accounts across five decades along the same ridgeline running from northern Georgia into eastern Tennessee.

In Part Three, a competitive bowhunter named Marcus shares an account from late September of two thousand three. Marcus was scouting a clearcut in the Cherokee National Forest from a ridge saddle at about thirty-two hundred feet when he observed something step off a stump at the far end of the clearing and walk upright through waist-high brush for over two hundred yards. He watched through a Swarovski ATS 80 spotting scope at approximately four hundred yards for nearly four and a half minutes, timing the observation at three minutes and forty-seven seconds on his watch.

He documented the subject's estimated height at seven to seven and a half feet based on vegetation reference, a stride of four and a half to five feet, uniformly dark brown coloring, disproportionately long arms ending near mid-thigh, a barrel-shaped torso with no visible neck, and a sustained bipedal gait with coordinated arm swing and no loss of balance. A group of whitetail does in the clearcut reacted to the subject before Marcus noticed it, freezing and orienting north simultaneously.

Three days later Marcus returned and mounted a Moultrie trail camera on a tree at the edge of the clearcut. After seven days he retrieved the SD card and found two hundred and nineteen images. Among them were two sequences showing an upright figure in the clearcut at night, with infrared eyeshine visible in the frames. One sequence showed the subject covering an estimated twenty to twenty-five feet between two frames taken one second apart.

The episode follows Marcus through twenty years of attempting to explain what he observed and what the camera captured, including his systematic elimination of bear, person, hallucination, and hoax as explanations, and the responses he received when he eventually shared the evidence with his wife and his brother, a state wildlife biologist who told him he could not identify what was in the images.

Have you experienced a Bigfoot sighting, Sasquatch encounter, Dogman experience, UFO sighting, or any unexplained cryptid or paranormal event deep in the woods? We want to hear your story.

Email your encounter to brian@paranormalworldproductions.com for a chance to be featured on a future episode of Backwoods Bigfoot Stories.

Backwoods Bigfoot Stories is a paranormal storytelling podcast featuring real Bigfoot encounters, Sasquatch sightings, Dogman reports, cryptid experiences, and true scary stories from the backwoods.

Follow the show and turn on automatic downloads so you never miss a chilling encounter from the forest. Listen with the lights off… if you dare.

Transcript

Speaker 1

For decades, people have disappeared in the woods without a trace. Some blame wild animals, others whisper of creatures the world refuses to believe in. But those who have survived they know the truth. Welcome to Backwoods Bigfoot Stories, where we share real encounters with the things lurking in the darkness bigfoot, dog man, UFOs, and creatures that defy explanation. Some make it out, others aren't so lucky. Are you ready, because once you hear these stories, you'll never walk in the

woods alone again. So grab your flashlight, stay close, and remember some things in the woods don't want to be found. Hit that follow or subscribe button, turn on auto downloads, and let's head off into the woods if you dare. If you've been with me for the first two parts of this series, you know what we're doing here. And if you haven't, go back and listen to those first, because this one's going to land different. If you've heard what came before it, here's the quick version for context.

Part one was Herschel, retired mill worker from Dalton, Georgia, nineteen seventy eight. He and three buddies leased a hunting parcel in the Kahudah Wilderness, and over the course of five nights, something came into their camp and messed with them, not attacked, messed with, moved their coolers without damaging them, took a dressed dough off the hanging pole and laid it in the fire ring like a centerpiece. There was knocking from two directions the valley, answering the ridge back

and forth, coordinated like something talking to something else. Bipedal footsteps heavy enough that one of the guys felt the impact through the ground. And on the last night herschel put his flashlight into the hemlocks and got reddish eyes shine back at about eight feet something just standing there looking at him. Part two was Karen sixteen years later, twelve miles north same ridge line. She was a seasonal worker for the Forest Service doing road maintenance on a

decommissioned fire road. Over three weeks, she documented tree breaks at six to nine feet, a smell that showed up at the same GPS coordinates every afternoon on a schedule, nineteen inch tracks and creaked mud with no claw marks, and handprints on a clay bank with fingers longer than hers. Then, on her last week, she got a flat tire on

the road. After dark, something walked toward her on the gravel, stopped about forty feet away, paced back and forth across the road for ten minutes, and then stepped off into the timber and exhaled one long breath from above her head height, close enough to hear the rasp of it. Two people who've never met, same ridge, same behavioral patterns, the slow escalation, the deliberate review, the silence that drops

over the woods when the thing gets close. Tonight, we jump nine years past Karen and a few more miles up the corridor. It's two thousand and three, late September, and a man named Marcus is sitting alone on a ridge saddle in the Cherokee National Forest with a spotting scope and a notebook, doing what he does every fall, scouting terrain, reading sign getting ready for bo season. He's

not looking for anything weird. He's looking for deer, and his optics are about to show him something that'll take up space in his head for the next twenty years. Now, what makes this story different from the first two, and I realized this pretty early in my conversations with Marcus, is the nature of the evidence. Herschel's story was experiential. He felt things, heard things, saw eyeshine in the dark. Karen's was more methodical. She documented physical evidence over weeks, prints, smell,

tree breaks. But both of their stories depend ultimately on their testimony. You believe them or you don't. There's nothing they can hand you. Marcus has something he can hand you. He has trail camera images. He has field notes taken during the observation with time stamps. He has data. And for a story like this, data changes the conversation. It doesn't prove anything. I want to be careful about that. Trail camera images from three aren't exactly forensic quality, but

they exist. They're on an SD card in a fireproof safe, and they show something that a wildlife biologist couldn't identify. That matters in a field where most of the evidence is anecdotal, Any physical record matters. Marcus sent me an email about two thousand words, single spaced, no preamble. No, you're probably not going to believe this. He just opened with the date, the location, the weather conditions, and what

he observed. He used the word observe four times on the first page, not saw, not spotted, observed, like he was writing up a field report for someone who was going to grade it. That told me a lot about who I was dealing with before I ever heard his voice. When I called, he answered with his full name, first and last, like a business line. His voice is steady, a little clipped. He talks the way people talk when they've spent years in professional settings. We're saying the wrong

word costs you something. He doesn't ramble, he doesn't backtrack. If he starts a sentence, he finishes it, and when he's done with the thought, he stops. No trailing off, no filler, no you know what I mean, just clean delivery. It's almost unsettling how precise he is. Marcus is fifty one, lives outside Knoxville with his wife and their teenage son. He sells industrial equipment, compressors, generators, that kind of thing, the kind of sales were you've got to know your

product cold and answer technical questions on the fly. He's been doing it for over fifteen years. Before that, he was in the Army for six years, including a deployment to Kosovo in ninety nine. He doesn't talk about the military much, mentioned it once briefly and moved on. He's been bow hunting since he was fourteen when his dad set him up with a recurve in the backyard, shooting at a bag target propped against the fence. And here's where I need you to pay attention, because the bow

hunting thing isn't a side detail. It's the lens. Everything else gets filtered through. Marcus competes in three D archery. That's where you walk a course through the woods and shoot at foam animal targets set at distances. Nobody tells you. You have to estimate the range yourself from the terrain, from the size of the target, from experience. Then you adjust for angle and wind and put the arrow in a kill zone about the size of a paper plate.

He's been doing this for over twenty years. He's placed at state level competitions. He practices almost every day, even in the off season, and he keeps a log draw weight, arrow speed, group size at different distances. He tracks it the way some people track their mile times. He brings that same discipline to his hunting. When Marcus scouts a new area, he doesn't just walk through and look around.

He sits, He watches. He writes things down in a field journal, date time, temperature, wind, speed, and direction, barometric pressure, cloud cover, what he sees and where he sees it. He photographs terrain features. He treats scouting like data collection, because to him, that's what it is. More data, better decisions, better decisions, more filled tags. That's how his mind works. Everything is a system. I'm telling you all of this because what happens next only means what it means if

you understand who it's happening to. This isn't somebody who gets startled by a shadow and calls it a monster. This is a man who measures things, who trusts what he can see through good glass and what he can write down in a notebook. And what he saw that morning in the Cherokee broke his system. He'd been looking at this particular area on a topo map for a couple of seasons. A series of ridge saddles connecting higher ground to a creek bottom with a clear cut on

the east side that was about five years old. Young clearcuts grow back thick BlackBerry, sumac, young tulip, poplar, deer food, and the edge where the clearcut meets standing timber is where deer move between feeding and bedding. On paper, it looked like exactly the kind of spot a mature buck

would set up in the fall. Late September three, he drove out before dawn, parked at a trailhead about two miles from the area he wanted to look at, and hiked in on an old logging road scope, tripod, journal, water, a couple energy bar, just a scouting trip. The walk took about forty five minutes. He was moving quiet, the way he always does when he's approaching an area he wants to glass. You don't go crashing through the woods when you're trying to see what's there before it sees you.

He got to a saddle on the ridge at about seven point fifteen good vantage point. The clear cut spread out below him to the east, maybe three hundred yards across, five or six hundred yards long, sloping gently down to a creek standing timber on the far side. Climbing the opposite ridge, he could see the whole thing from up there. He set up his scope behind a downed log. Swarovsky ats eighty and if you're not into optics, all you need to know is that it's serious glass twenty to

sixty power magnification. At four hundred yards you can count the times on a rack. The image is sharp enough that you trust what you're seeing. Marcus has been looking through scopes like this for over twenty years. He knows how to read an image distance. Clear morning, low fifties, light, wind from the northwest. He wrote all of it down

before he started looking. That's just what he does. For the first hour and a half, he watched deer feeding at the south end, a young six pointer along the timber edge, couple of turkeys scratching around in the open. Good activity. He was feeling positive about the area, and then around eight forty five, every dough in the clear cut stopped feeding at the same time. Deer don't do

that for no reason. When a group of dos all stop eating simultaneously and point the same direction, something is there. Marcus has seen it a thousand times. A coyote moving through brush, another deer approaching a person on a trail. The dos are the early warning system. They see it first. But what he was seeing wasn't casual alertness. These deer were frozen, ears locked forward, bodies stiff, every one of them staring north. He watched them for about fifteen seconds.

The little buck did the same thing. Turkeys went heads up. Every animal in that clearing was looking at the same spot at the north end of the clear cut. Every prey animal in a three hundred yard field just stopped what it was doing and locked onto one point. Whatever they were looking at. It wasn't a squirrel. Marcus swung the scope north. There was a stump up there, big one, about four feet tall three feet across, left over from the timber harvest. He'd noticed it earlier when he scanned

the clearing. Unremarkable. Now there was something standing on it, something that hadn't been there an hour ago. First thought was bear. Black bear standing on the stump to get a look around. They do that sometimes, get up on an elevated surface to see over the brush. He's seen

it before. Not common, but not weird. He centered the scope, brought the magnification up to about forty power and looked dark black or very dark brown, wide across the shoulders and chest, standing upright on the stump, facing south, roughly toward the doze. The head was turned slightly away from him, so he couldn't make out the face. No obvious neck. The head looked like it sat right on the shoulders, thick torso all around. He wrote bear on stump north

end in his journal and kept watching. Figured it would drop to all fours in a few seconds, confirmed the id and he'd move on. It didn't drop. It stepped off the stump, not jumped, not slid, stepped one leg forward, extended to the ground, weight transferred, smooth, controlled the way you or I would step off a curb. And it kept going on two legs. Marcus told me his brain needed a few seconds to process what his eyes were showing him. He was waiting for the drop. That's the

thing with bears. When they stand up, it's temporary. A few seconds, a couple of wobbly steps, and back down to four legs. That's how they're built. He had his mental model loaded and ready, stump stand step, drop, walk away on all fours, but the drop didn't come. Five seconds, ten fifteen. It was still upright, still walking, still moving

south through the brush on two legs. He told me there was a specific moment, he remembers it clearly, when his brain switched categories, when it stopped being bear doing something unusual and became I don't know what I'm looking at. He said. It was like a gear slipping one second he had a name for this thing, and the next second the name fell off, and there was just this shape in his scope that didn't match anything. And here's what's interesting about Marcus. He didn't panic, he didn't pull

away from the scope. He did what Marcus does. He kept watching and he started recording details. His training kicked in the same way it kicks in when he's ranging a target at a tournament. Assess, measure record, whatever this was,

he was going to observe it properly. It walked upright into the clear cut south through waist high brush, steady, even strides its arms and he used the word arms, not legs, not four legs, hung at its sides and swung with each step, left arm forward when the right leg stepped, right arm forward when the left natural bipedal arm swing. Except the arms were too long. They hung down past the waist, past where your hands would fall if you were walking. They ended somewhere around mid thigh.

I asked him to go through it piece by piece. What else could he see at forty power? He got quiet for a second. That's his tail when he's making sure he's going to say exactly what he means and nothing more. Stay tuned for more Backwoods bigfoot stories. We'll be back after these messages. The color was consistent all over, dark brown, not black. He was firm about that, like wet bark, he said, or dark chocolate. Same tone head to toe, no lighter patches on the chest or face.

The surface had texture, not smooth, more like a rough coat of some kind, and it absorbed light instead of reflecting it, which made it hard to pick out anatomical detail even through the scope. The head was wide, whiter than a person's. He thought he saw a slight crest or peak at the top, but he was careful about it. I don't want to add something I'm not sure of, he said, might have been the angle. The shoulders were big, wide, and sloped, with a thickness to the upper body that

made a human build look narrow by comparison. Chest was deep front to back, much thicker than anything human shape should be. He said. It looked like a barrel. No taper at the waist, more like a cylinder. He couldn't see. The face angle was wrong for most of the observation. He thought he caught a partial profile at one point, flat face, heavy brow, but he wouldn't commit to it. I'm not going to describe something I didn't clearly see.

He said, that's Marcus. He'd rather leave a gap in the account than fill it with a guess, and that, to me is what makes him credible. People who are making things up fill in every gap. People who are telling the truth leave the parts they're not sure about empty. He estimated height by the brush. He knew what was growing in that clear cut BlackBerry Siu mac young poplar three to three and a half feet in the open areas.

The brush hit this thing at about the waist. That puts it somewhere around seven to seven and a half feet tall. He estimated stride by watching it pass fixed points, stumps, rocks, individual bushes. He could identify four and a half to five feet between steps, consistent same pace the whole way across. That's a long stride, longer than a tall person's, and it covered ground about two hundred yards of open clearcut walking upright the entire time, no stumbling, no wobbling, no

dropping to all fours. It moved through that brush the way you'd walk down your driveway, like it wasn't thinking about the act of walking because it didn't need to like That was just the way it got around. After about a minute, he started his watch time or function on his Casio. Three minutes and forty seven seconds that's how long he watched it after he thought to hit the button. Total observation was closer to four and a half minutes. I want you to sit with that number.

Four and a half minutes through a Swarovsky's spoting scope in clear morning light. That's not a glimpse. That's not a flash in the headlights. That's sitting there, eyed a glass watching something walk across a field for longer than it takes to boil an egg. At the south end, it reached the timber and walked straight in. Didn't pause, didn't slow down, didn't look back one second. It was there, and then it was gone. The doughs were gone too, He hadn't noticed them leave. He'd been locked on the

scope the whole time. He sat behind that log for at least ten minutes afterward, didn't move, kept the scope pointed at the spot where it went into the trees, hoping it would come back, hoping he'd get another look that might make the whole thing make sense. Nothing the clear cut was empty. The turkeys were gone, the doughs were gone. Everything that had been out there fifteen minutes ago had cleared out, and the field just sat there, still and vacant. He pulled his eye off the scope

and looked down at his hands on the tripod. They were shaking, not a lot, but enough to notice. He sat there and watched his own hands tremble and had a thought that came through as clearly as if someone had spoken it out loud. Either something is wrong with the world or something is wrong with me, and I need to figure out which one it is. I want to stop here for a second, because I think that line tells you everything about Marcus. He didn't think what

the hell was that. He didn't think I need to get out of here. He thought, I need to figure this out. That's who he is. Even in the middle of something that shook him to his core, his instinct was to frame it as a problem that needed solving, not to run from it. To understand it. Most people aren't like that. Most people, when they see something they can't explain, they either panic or they start talking themselves out of it before they've even finished processing it. Marcus

did neither. He just sat there with the question and started working on it. Here's where the story shifts, and honestly, this is the part I find most compelling about Marcus's whole account, because the sighting itself is remarkable. Four and a half minutes through a Swarowski in clear light at a distance where the optics give you real detail. That's an extraordinary observation. But what makes Marcus' story different from most encounters I hear about isn't the sighting. It's what

happened in his head afterward. It's the twenty year aftermath of a man whose entire worldview is built on evidence and logic, trying to reconcile what his evidence is telling him with what his logic says shouldn't be possible. With most encounter stories, the sighting is the whole thing. Somebody sees something, they describe it, end of story. With Marcus,

the sighting is the first act. The second act is a man slowly coming apart at the seams because the world stopped making sense and he can't force it back together. He sat on that saddle for two more hours after the thing disappeared. Didn't Scout, didn't Glass for deer. He sat there with his journal open on his knee and wrote time of initial observation. Estimated distance four hundred yards

based on the known dimensions of the clear cut. Height estimate one to seven and a half feet derived from brush height comparison, Stride estimate four and a half to five feet measured against fixed reference points, color proportions. He went through these methodically, the way you describe something in a biology lab. Head to shoulder ratio, arm length relative to torso length, depth of the chest front to back.

He described the gait in specific terms, sustained bipedal locomotion, consistent stride length and cadence, coordinated armswing, no evidence of instability or compensatory movement. Duration three minutes forty seven seconds on the timer. Estimated total observation four to four and a half minutes. He sketched the clear cut from memory and drew the thing's path with the dotted line. He

noted wind direction, temperature, cloud cover. He noted that the deer had reacted to the thing before he ever saw it, and that every animal in the clearing had vacated during or shortly after the observation. And then he sat there and read what he'd written, read it back to himself twice, and each time the same question. What was it? So he started running through the options one by one, the way an engineer works through a troubleshooting list. You don't

skip ahead to the weird answer. You start with the obvious ones and eliminate them. Bear was first. That's the one he was pulling for a black bear walking on its hind legs. He knows bears, He's watched dozens of them in these mountains. And here's what he knows about bears on two legs. It looks wrong. The hips aren't

designed for it. The center of gravity tips forward, they shuffle, they wobble, and they drop back to all fours within a few steps, because sustained upright walking isn't what their skeleton is built to do. He's watched videos, he's read about the biomechanics. He's seen it in person. He knows what it looks like. What he watched through that scope. Nothing like that. The thing moved like being upright was its factory setting. No forward lean, no shuffle, no effort.

It walked the way you and I walk, except it was seven and a half feet tall with arms that hung to its thighs and a torso built like a fifty five gallon drum. He spent about an hour trying to make bear work. Couldn't person was next, big person in dark clothing, maybe a gilly suit, maybe heavy coveralls that hid the clothing lines he worked through it. Could a person be seven and a half feet tall? Technically possible,

though you're talking about one in several million. Could a person walk through waist high brush at that speed without stumbling, maybe if they knew the ground. Could a person have arms that hang down to mid thigh. No, that's the one that killed it for him. That's not a clothing issue. That skeletal proportion. Human arms end at about fingertip to mid thigh at the very longest, and that's on a

person with unusually long arms. What he saw through the scope had arms that were proportionally longer than any human variation he'd ever seen or read about. He couldn't make person work either, and that left him on a ridge in the Cherokee with a journal full of careful observations and absolutely nowhere to file them, no category, no label, no explanation that survived contact with the data. Here's what

gets me about this part of Marcus's story. Most people, when they hit this wall, when the normal explanations run out, they picked the least bad one anyway. They grab onto bear or person or trick of the light, even if it doesn't really hold up, because having a shaky answer feels better than having no answer at all. Marcus couldn't do that. His brain won't let him accept an explanation that doesn't survive scrutiny. It's the same thing that makes

him a good competitive archer. He doesn't fudge his yard adjustamates. He doesn't round off his grouping data. If the number is what it is, that's the number. You don't change it to make yourself feel better. So instead of picking the least bad option, he just sat there with the

question open, unanswered for twenty years and counting. On the drive home, he pulled over twice, not because he was having some kind of emotional episode, because his brain was grinding on the problem so hard that he stopped watching

the road. He realized he'd been driving for ten minutes without any awareness of speed or traffic or turns, and that scared him enough to pull into a gravel lot near a trailhead and sit there for fifteen minutes with the truck running, just sitting, eyes on the windshield but not seeing anything, running the observation through his head frame by frame. He pulled over a second time, about twenty

minutes later. This time he grabbed his journal and wrote down things he'd remembered since the first round of notes, details that had surfaced. The way the brush bent forward as the things left legs pushed through it, and then sprang back upright after it passed, the fact that it never turned its head, not once during the entire crossing.

It just faced forward and walked, the consistency of the stride, not speeding up, not slowing down, not adjusting for obstacles, same pace, same length, every step like a machine, except machines don't have muscles, and machines don't scare deer. He went home, made dinner for himself and his son. His wife was working late that night, helped the kid with homework, sat on the couch and stared at the TV without

absorbing any of it. Went through all the motions of a normal evening while his brain was one hundred miles away on a ridge saddle looking through a scope at something that shouldn't exist. He went to bed around ten, lay there for three hours. Every time he'd start to drift towards sleep, his brain would serve up another frame from the observation, and he'd be fully awake again. The step down from the stump, the arm swing, the brush parting,

the timber, swallowing it over and over. He considered hallucination, and I want to be clear, he didn't just wave this off. He sat with it. He gave it honest, serious consideration. Because Marcus is the kind of person who'd rather discover he had a medical episode than except that he saw something impossible. A hallucination would be easier. A hallucination has an explanation. You go to a doctor, you get checked out, you find the cause, you address it.

That's a solvable problem. What he saw through that scope, if it was real, is not a solvable problem, Not for him, not for anyone. So he went through the checklist. Had he been drinking the night before, No, was he on any medication, No, had he ever experienced a visual hallucination before under any circumstances. No, did anyone in his family have a hissy tree of psychosis, schizophrenia, anything that

might produce visual hallucinations. No, was he sleep deprived, Not really, He'd slept fine the night before, about six hours dehydrated possible, but he'd been drinking water on the hike in low blood sugar maybe, but he'd eaten a granola bar before

he started glassing. Was there any environmental factor, gas seeping from the ground, something in the air, a carbon monoxide issue with his truck that might have lingered, anything at all that could explain a sustained, coherent visual hallucination lasting four and a half minutes. He couldn't find one. And here's the thing that really kills the hallucination theory. And I want you to hear this because it's the part

people tend to overlook. Hallucinations are incoherent. They're fragmentary. They shift and morph and don't hold together under sustained observation. What Marcus saw maintained consistent proportions, consists gait, consistent speed across two hundred yards for nearly five minutes. The brush physically bent around it as it walked. He watched it happen through the scope, individual stalks of vegetation bending forward as the legs pushed through and springing back up after.

That's not in his head. That's physics. And the deer, the dos reacted to the thing before Marcus ever saw it. They stopped feeding, turned north, and froze. That reaction happened in the real world. Those deer were responding to a stimulus that was in the clear cut, not in Marcus's brain. If he hallucinated the thing on the stump, then the deer just happened to independently react to the same spot at the same moment for no reason. That's not a

coincidence he could accept. He told me the hallucination theory lasted about half an hour before it fell apart, the same way everything else had no angle survived contact with the data. He didn't sleep that night or the next, and those two nights were bad. Not because he was scared. That's not really the right word for what Marcus was going through. It was more like his operating system had

crashed and he couldn't reboot it. He'd lie there in the dark and his brain would cycle through the observation, try to match it to a known category, fail and start over. Stump step, walk, arms, brush, timber, what was it on a loop? Stay tuned for more Backwoods bigfoot stories. We'll be back after these messages. For hours, his wife could tell something was wrong. She's been married to the man for over twenty years. She knows what his silence sounds like when he's focused on a work problem, and

what it sounds like when something's actually bothering him. Second night, she asked. He told her he'd seen something in the woods that was eating at him. She asked what. He said, I'm not sure yet, which was true in the sense that he knew exactly what he'd observed but hadn't decided yet what he was willing to call it. She didn't push, and I think that restraint matters. She gave him space

to work through it at his own pace. She could have pressed him, could have gotten worried, could have suggested he see someone. She just let him sit with it. That's trust. Third morning, kitchen table, coffee journal, quiet house, wife still asleep, kids still asleep, and Marcus sat there and made a decision. He was done running the loop. Replaying the observation in his head wasn't solving anything. It was just wearing a groove. He needed to do something different.

He needed to do what he knows how to do collect more data. He had a few Moultarie trail cameras standard gear for the early two thousands, motion sensor infrared flash for nighttime images saved to an SD card. He used them every season to pattern deer. You strap one to a tree, pointed at a trail or a food source. Come back in a week see what walked by. Simple. Three days after the siding, he loaded a camera in his pack and drove back to the Cherokee, and the

walk in felt different this time. He told me that was the first thing he noticed. The first trip. He'd been relaxed scouting. This time, he was wound tight before he even left the truck. He was paying attention to everything, not just the stuff he'd normally notice, but everything. A branch cracking somewhere off the trail, a shadow that shifted in his peripheral vision, the way birds went quiet in one section of timber and then started up again after

he passed through. He caught himself stopping to check his back trail, which is something he never does. He had a Glock twenty on his hip, ten milimeter, a serious handgun. He'd never felt the need to carry a sidearm while scouting. Before, he'd been in these woods hundreds of times without one and never thought twice. The fact that he strapped it on that morning without even debating it told him something about where his head was, and he didn't love what

it told him. I hear this from witnesses more than you'd think. Not the gun specifically. It's the behavior change that comes after people who spent their entire lives comfortable in the woods suddenly aren't. Something breaks in the relationship. You've been in a room your whole life and felt safe there, and then one day you find out there was something in the room with you the whole time

that you never knew about. The room doesn't change, you change, and you can't change back because you can't unknow what you know. Something had shifted between Marcus and the woods. Some trust he'd carried his whole life was gone, and he hadn't agreed to give it up. He got to the saddle, glassed the clear cut for about thirty minutes. Force of habit. Nothing unusual does feeding at the south end. Turkeys, a hawk on the far ridge, no dark shapes on stumps.

He walked down to the edge of the clear cut and picked a tree for the camera, big oak, about halfway between the saddle and the north end where the stump was. He wanted the widest coverage possible, so he mounted the camera about five feet up, angled slightly down, pointed east across the opening, turned it on, checked the battery, made sure the card was seated, stepped back and photographed the camera's position with his own camera so he could find the exact tree when he came back, wrote down

the GPS coordinates. Then he left. Didn't stayed a scout, didn't sit on the saddle. He wanted his scent out of there. If something was using this clear cut, his presence would alter the pattern. He gave it seven days, and those seven days were rough. I asked him about this specifically because I think the waiting period is an underappreciated part of these stories. People hear about the siding and the trail camera, and they focus on those moments.

But the end between, the part where you're just living your life while this thing is sitting in the back of your skull, that's where the real weight is. He went to work, made sales calls, sat in meetings, smiled at customers, drove to his son's soccer games and stood on the sideline, clapping at the right moments. Normal life, normal routine. But underneath all of it, the clear cut

was running like a program he couldn't close. He'd be mid sentence on a phone call giving a quote on a compressor system, and suddenly he was back on that saddle, watching the arms swing. He'd be standing in line at the grocery store and he'd realize he'd been staring at the cereal aisle for two minutes without seeing it because his brain was replaying the moment the thing stepped off the stump. He'd be in the shower, driving, mowing the yard.

It didn't matter. It was always there. His wife noticed he was off, he could tell she noticed, but she didn't bring it up again after that first conversation, and he didn't volunteer anything. He told me. He lay in bed every one of those seven nights, running the same calculation. If the camera catches something, then the observation was real. It wasn't a hallucination, it wasn't a mistake. It wasn't his brain glitching in the early morning light. It was there.

And if it was there once and the camera catches it again, then it's still there, which means it lives there, which means every time he's ever walked through woods like that, it might have been there too, and he just didn't know it. That thought kept him up that one, specifically, on day seven he drove back. He told me he woke up early that morning, not from an alarm, just from his brain kicking on at about four point thirty

and refusing to go back to sleep. He lay there for a few minutes thinking about what might be on that card. Two possibilities really. Either it caught something and his life was about to get more complicated in ways he couldn't predict. Or it caught nothing and he was back to being a man with a very detailed journal entry about something nobody else witnessed and no evidence to support. He wasn't sure which one he was hoping for. He thought about that on the drive out and couldn't decide.

The morning was overcast, mid forties, with mist hanging in the drainages. The Cherokee looked different in October than it had in late September, more color in the canopy, colder air, the feel of the year turning over. He hiked in on the same trail, moving a little faster than usual, not because he was eager, because he wanted this part to be done. He wanted to see the images and deal with whatever they showed and stop wondering. He got to the saddle, checked the clear cut from habit empty,

nothing moving, and walked down to the camera tree. Everything looked normal, cameras still in place, still pointed right, no damage, no signs that an animal had messed with it, battery at about sixty percent, green light blinking. He stood in front of it for a second before he opened the housing.

And I think this is one of the most human moments in this whole story, that pause, that half second where your hand is on the latch but you haven't opened it yet, because you know that whatever's inside is going to change something, and you can't unsee it once you look. It's the same feeling as opening an envelope with test results in it. You're standing at a boundary

and you know you're about to cross it. He opened it, popped the card, put a fresh one in, sat down at the base of the oak with his back against the trunk, pulled out his laptop, little Tshiba he carried for work and slid the card. In two hundred and

nineteen images. He started going through them the same way he always does with trail camera pulls, one at a time, time stamp, species, direction of travel, deer doze at different times of day, a four point buck, a decent eight with a nice spread, raccoons at night, a possum, a coyote trotting through early morning, a tom turkey in full strut. Normal stuff. Under any other circumstances, he would have been excited about that eight pointer, would have started planning a

stand location. These were not normal circumstances. About one hundred and forty images in the rhythm broke timestamp said three seventeen am night four infrared shot that washed out gray green you get from night mode trail cameras. Brush in the clear cut tree line behind it, and in the middle of the frame, maybe thirty feet out, a shape standing up tall. His first reaction was that someone walked past the camera. A person standing facing roughly toward the lens,

but the proportions were wrong. Same issue as the scope observation shoulders too wide for the head, arms too long, no visible clothing, no collar, no cuffs, no belt line, just one continuous form, same tone top to bottom, and then the eyes. The infrared had caught them bright spots high in the frame, spaced wider than a person's pointed at the camera. He stared at that image for five full minutes without moving, laptop on his knees back against

the oak bark. His hands were shaking, not from the cold. I want to tell you what he told me went through his head in that moment, because I think it says everything about who Marcus is. He said. It wasn't triumph, wasn't excitement, wasn't fear. It was something closer to resignation, because part of him had been hoping the card would come back clean. Two hundred images of deer and nothing else. That would have meant the sighting was a one time event, weird, unexplainable,

but isolated. He could have lived with that, could have filed it under strange thing that happened once and eventually stopped losing sleep. But the card wasn't clean. Something was on it, something that matched what he'd seen through the scope, which meant it was still out there. It hadn't wandered off, it hadn't been passing through. It was using this area. He went to the next image, same timestamp. One second later. The camera was set to do a quick double shot

when it triggered. In the second frame, the shape had shifted farther left, body turned more toward the timber edge, but the head was turned back like it started to move away and then looked over its shoulder at the camera, and that detail got under his skin. He kept coming back to it when we talked. The thing knew the camera was there. It had to. First frame, it's facing the lens. Second frame, it's turning away but checking back. That's not an animal wandering past a sensor. That's something

that noticed the device. Two frames, one second apart, something upright in the clear cut at three in the morning. Looking at his camera. He kept scrolling three more triggered sequences over the remaining nights, all at night. Two of them showed nothing useful. The camera fire, but whatever tripped it was out of frame or too far to register, just empty brush. But the last sequence was different. Two

eight am night six two frames. In the first the shape was at the far edge of the censor range, small in the image, but clearly upright, standing near the stump at the north end the same stump in the second frame. One second later it was significantly closer. Marcus estimated it had covered twenty to twenty five feet between frames. That's not walking speed. At twenty five feet per second, you're looking at a sprint. Something had been standing at the far end of the clear cut and closed that

distance in the time between two shutter clicks. He went through all two hundred and nineteen images twice, went through the flagged sequences three more times, adjusted the screen brightness, zoomed in as far as the resolution allowed. The images were rough three trail camera technology wasn't exactly high, and the infrared killed most of the fine detail, but the basics were there. Something upright, something tall, something with eyes

that reflected infrared. Visiting that clear cut at night on multiple nights, he saved everything to the laptop, put the original SD card in a plastic bag and sealed it. Took the camera down, packed his bag, and he sat there for a minute, looking out at the clear cut. Sun was starting to break through the clouds, lighting up patches of brush. It was a good spot, good habitat the kind of place he'd normally come back to for years. He didn't come back He made a decision that week,

and he's kept it for twenty years. He wasn't going to chase this. He wasn't going to set up camera grids, or build a blind or show up at night with thermal gear. He thought about it. He still thinks about it, but he decided that whatever was out there, he wasn't going to let it turn him into somebody he's not. I'm a bowhunter, he said, That's what I do. I went out there looking for deer and found something else. I documented it the way I know how and brought

the data home. That's my skill set. I don't know what to do past that, and I've made my peace with it. He kept the SD card in a fireproof safe, same safe where he keeps important documents and his wife's jewelry. Didn't show it to anyone for over a decade. And here's the part that I think a lot of people listening to this are going to recognize because I've heard versions of it from so many witnesses over the years.

The sighting itself is something that happens to you. What comes after that's something you have to live with, and the living with it is often harder than the thing itself. Marcus went back to hunting different area of the Cherokee miles from the clear cut filled his tag. That year, life kept going from the outside. Nothing changed. From the inside,

everything did. He told me. He thinks about it at least once a week, even now, not obsessively, just this question that got lodged somewhere in the back of his brain and never came loose. He'll be driving to a meeting in his mind will slip back to the saddle. He'll be eating lunch and realize he's replaying the arm swing. He'll be on the edge of sleep, and those two infrared dots will show up the trail camera image, the eyes looking at the lens, and he's awake again. Stay

tuned for more Backwoods Bigfoot stories. We'll be back after these messages. It changed how he hunts, though he'd never say that to anyone he competes against. He notices things now that he used to walk right past. How a ridge goes quiet sometimes for no reason. He can identify how deer react to something. He can't see, every head turning the same direction at the same time, the way the deer did right before the sighting tree breaks along ridge lines that don't match, wind damage or ice sounds

at dawn and dusk he can't a name to. And here's the thing about that, you can't unsee it. Once you know there's something in the woods that isn't supposed to be there. The woods are never the same again. Every shadow has an extra dimension to it. Every silence could mean something. He used to walk into the forest and see a simple picture, terrain, wind, sign, shot, opportunity. Now he sees something with layers, something with depth he

didn't know about before three. He told me, it's like someone pulled back a curtain and showed him a room he didn't know was there. And now every time he's in the woods he can feel that room behind the wall. He's never had another sighting twenty years, hundreds of days in the field, not a glimpse, he told me. Part of him is always watching for it. Though every time he puts his eye to a scope, there's a corner of his brain that's not looking at deer. It's scanning

for something else. I've thought about which would be worse, he said, seeing it again and having to go through all of this as say, second time, or never seeing it and spending the rest of my life not knowing for certain whether what happened was real. I don't have an answer for that. I go back and forth. The research happened slowly. He didn't dive in right away. He was too shaken for that, and he wasn't ready to admit to himself what he was researching. But over the

months and years that followed, he started reading quietly. He'd go to the public library in Knoxville and check books out instead of buying them because he didn't want titles like that showing up on his Amazon account or his credit card statement. He browsed the internet in private mode. He read in his truck during lunch at work, angled away from the window so nobody walking by would see the cover. I want to pause on that for a second, because I think it says something important about how this

subject gets treated in our culture. Here's a man, army veteran, successful professional competitive athlete, father, husband, sneaking around like he's doing something shameful because he's trying to understand what he saw in the woods. That's what the stigma does. It turns legitimate inquiry into something people feel like they have to hide. Marcus wasn't embarrassed about the sighting. He was embarrassed about looking into it. And there's a difference, and

it matters. He started with the skeptical material because that's what he wanted to work. He needed somebody with credentials to hand him a clean, rational explanation that would close the book. Misidentification, hoax, perceptual error. He was pulling for one of those to be the answer, the way you pull for your team in a playoff game. He needed it. None of it held up. The misidentification argument fell apart against his observation data. He didn't glimpse something from a

car window. He watched it through a swarowsky for four minutes in clear light. The hoax argument couldn't explain why somebody would be in a suit in the middle of the Cherokee at eight forty five in the morning with no audience, and then returned to the same spot at three am, four nights later to walk past a trail camera they couldn't have known was there. And perceptual error doesn't account for the fact that the deer reacted to the thing before he ever saw it. He exhausted every

debunking angle he could find and came up empty. And let me tell you, for a man like Marcus, coming up empty on the debunking was worse than the sighting itself, because the sighting at least was over. It happened, and it was done. But the failure of every rational explanation to hold up against the evidence that was ongoing, that

was something he woke up with every morning. He told his wife about five years in, sat her down one evening after the kid was asleep, opened the laptop, pulled up the trail camera images, and walked her through the whole thing start to finish. He did it the way he does everything, organized step by step. Data first, interpretation. Second, he showed her the images, the field notes, the sketches.

She looked at the photos for a while, then she said, I believe you saw something, which is a kind thing to say to your husband. And Marcus knew it was kind. He also knew what it meant. I believe you saw something is not the same as I believe what you saw is what you think it is. It's the response of someone who loves you and doesn't want to call you delusional, but isn't quite ready to follow you down this particular path. He understood the distinction. He appreciated her kindness,

he didn't push it. He showed his brother around twenty twelve. This was the one he'd been building up to for years. His brother is a wildlife biologist for the state of Tennessee. If there's anyone in Marcus's life who should be able to look at a trail camera image and give him a definitive answer, it's a guy whose literal job is identifying wildlife. His brother took his time with it. He asked detailed questions camera model, detection range, infrared wavelength and

temperature because temperature affects infrared sensor performance. Estimated distance of the subject angle, all the right questions. Professional great inquiry from a trained scientist. Then he sat back and said, I can't tell you what that is. Not it's a bear. Not your camera malfunctioned. Not somebody was out there in a suit. He said he could not identify what was in the images, and then he changed the subject didn't

bring it up again. A state wildlife biologist looking at a trail camera image taken in the woods of eastern Tennessee, saying, I don't know what that is. That's not a civilian shrugging. That's a professional admitting the limits of his field. Marcus told me that might have been the single most frustrating conversation of his life. Validating in one sense his own brother, a trained expert, wasn't dismissing him, but devastating in another sense,

because it meant nobody was going to solve this. Nobody was going to hand him the clean answer that let him close the file and move on. He found our show about a year and a half ago his son, which is ironic if you think about it. Send him a link to an episode. He listened, and then he

listened to more. He told me the ones that got to him were the long duration sightings, encounters where the witness had real time on the thing, where they could describe proportions, gate behavior in specific detail, rather than just

I saw something big run across the road. He recognized what those people were describing, same proportions, same gate, same unhurried, confident movement, people in different states, different years, completely different circumstances, talking about what sounded like the same thing he'd watched cross a clear cut in three That's what pushed him

to write. He spent a week on the email, two thousand words organized like a field report, date, location, conditions, observation, evidence, no emotional language, not a word of speculation, just data. When I called him back, the first thing he said after giving me his name was, I want you to know I'm not looking for attention. I don't want to be on social media. I don't want my name attached

to this publicly. I'm telling you because I think the observation has scientific value and the data should be somewhere besides a fireproof safe in my closet. That's the most Marcus sentence Marcus has ever said, and it's the reason I trust him. Here's what stays with me about this one. Every story in this series has a different detail that

hooks in and doesn't let go with Herschel. It's the deliberateness, the camp rearranged like a message, the rocks pointing north, the sense that something was running a test on four men from Dalton, Georgia to see what they tolerate with Karen. It's the breath that single exhale in the dark after three weeks of documenting evidence at arm's length, The prints, the smell, the tree breaks, Everything collapse down to one moment something close enough to hear the air come out

of it. With Marcus, it's time three minutes and forty seven seconds on the timer, nearly four and a half minutes total through a Swarovsky spotting scope in clear morning light. Most sightings last seconds. A shape in the headlights, something crossing a road, a figure at the tree line that's there and gone before you can get your phone out. Those sightings are real, I believe the people who report them. But there's only so much you can pull from three

or four seconds of startled observation. Marcus didn't have three seconds. He had close to five minutes, seated stable eye to a scope on a tripod. He watched it step off a stump walk two hundred yards and disappear into timber. He saw the arm swing, He estimated hight against known vegetation, he estimated against fixed objects, He timed it, He wrote it all down, and when he got home he tried to break his own observation. He spent twenty years trying.

That's not a glimpse. That's a record made by a man who knows how to make records. And then the trail camera backed it up. Whatever he saw during the day came back at night, not once, multiple times over the course of a week. It was using that area. It was there, which is the thread running through this whole series. The thing I keep coming back to. This corridor isn't the site of random one off encounters. It's territory.

Something lives in it. Something that was there when Herschel's camp got rearranged in seventy eight, something that was still there when Karen smelled it and found its tracks in ninety four, Something that was still there when Marcus watched it walk across a clear cut and then caught it on camera at three in the morning in O three, twenty five years. Same ridge system, the same valley, same corridor, and the same behavioral traits showing up over and over

from people who've never spoken to each other. Patience, deliberation, control, whatever this is, it doesn't panic around people, It doesn't run. It manages the encounter. It decides when to show, how much to reveal, and when to leave. Every time I didn't tell Marcus about Herschel or Karen before he gave me a story, I wanted it clean, no contamination. When

I eventually told him. When I said Marcus, two other people have described encounters along the same ridge line in different decades, and some of the details line up with yours. He went quiet for a long time, long enough that I checked my phone to see if the call dropped. Then he said that's either very good or very bad. I asked what he meant good, because it means I'm not the only one. If other people saw similar things in the same area, that's corroboration. That's a data point

in favor of my observation being accurate. Bad because if it's real, if something's been using that corridor for twenty five years or more, then it's been there this whole time, right there in the same mountains people hike and camp and hunt in every day, and almost nobody knows it. Three stories in now, seventy eight ninety four, three three people, three decades, one ridge, and the same details keep showing

up from people who've never exchanged a single word. Tree breaks at the same height, biological silence when this thing gets close, the watched feeling that precedes every encounter, bipedal locomotion that doesn't match bear, doesn't match human, doesn't match anything in any field guide, and the behavior that's the thread patient deliberate, controlled, never rushing, never panicking, always on its own terms. Three data points along a forty mile

corridor spanning a quarter century. I've got two left and next time. The whole feel of this series changes. We go from single witnesses alone in the back country to a fifteen passenger church van full of teenagers on a two lane highway twenty eleven. A youth pastor named David driving the kids home from a summer retreat, late dark road.

The highway cuts through the valley, the same valley that runs between the ridges, same gap, same corridor, and something walks out of the tree line and into the road. Not a deer, not a bear, something tall enough that the van's headlights hit it at the chest. Van headlights sit about two and a half feet off the ground. If the beam's catching something at chest height, you're looking at something well north of seven feet. It doesn't jump out of the way. The van hits it, or it

hits the van. David still isn't sure which hard enough to spin them off the road and into the ditch. Airbags go off, kids screaming. David gets out to check the damage, looks up at the tree line. It's there standing at the edge of the pavement looking at him, not running, not limping, not hurt, just standing there the way something stands when it's deciding what happens next. That story breaks the pattern because there's no slow build, no

three week documentation, no campfire escalation. It happens in about three seconds and then it's over except for the aftermath. But the aftermath is where it gets interesting because for

the first time in this series, there are multiple witnesses. David, two of the teenagers who are adults now and agreed to talk to me, and a tow truck driver who comes out to pull the van and mentions, almost as a side comment, that he's towed three other vehicles out of that same quarter mile of highway in the past year, three other impacts, same stretch. And after that we wrap this whole thing up. Part five. A retired land surveyor who surveyed the property boundary that runs right through the

heart of this corridor. He's got field notes, plat maps, and a cassette tape he recorded one night in nineteen eighty seven while he was out there working. He thought it was a coyote at the time. He doesn't think that anymore, but i'll save that for the end. I'll see you next time, Sa

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android