Cultural Restoration and Pride in Heritage

And we are alive. It is Friday, July twelfth, two thy twenty four. Good morning from the blocked out Sunseuch Sunshine State. Yeah, yeah, lovely. They do a lot of messed up things in Florida, yet it's supposed to be the free state, even though the Santus is the Zionest Man of the Year. Well he was in twenty nineteen or something like that. Okay, so I need an audio check from you. It's loudest hack in my ears, but the little green meter that's on stream yard is barely

moving and it's not usually like that. So please let me know if I'm sounding very low, because if I am, there's or if it sounds weird, like if it doesn't sound like a full microphone voice, then I know that it's trying to use the microphone that's in my camera and that's far away, and it'll sound like a really crappy microphone, like if you're talking through like a laptop or something without a mic. So if you can tell me

if the audio is okay, that's what I was messing with. That's why I'm a little bit late, because I noticed that the green meter when I do the audio test before I come in, was not raising as high as it usually does, and I don't know why. It's always something with streamyard and I took out the hopefully I think I figured out what was clipping. It sounds a bit lower than normal. What the fuck? Oh my god? Yeah, yeah, so why though? It doesn't make any sense?

Uh huh, I'm looking right now through the audio. Yeah, it says I'm on the right things. It says I'm on the road caster which or cast jet blah blah blah. Communications get yeah, default microphone, Yes, so it's yeah, but it's way low like I can't ah, I can't get any higher than that. It doesn't make any sense why it's doing that at all. So if i'm if I'm way lower, then we' we have problems. It's gonna be a real problem. It doesn't make it like it's

why would it be muffling it? I don't get it. I don't even know how you fix something like that. Maybe if I yeah, no, that's the same, that's the same setting. The speakers are in the wrong spot. Maybe it looks like it's yeah, I you know, I think it's screwing something up here. Hold on, Yeah, whatever I think they're putting both on the same line. Again, I think that might be an issue. Let me see if I they just make changes. I don't fucking

get it. Uh, let's see if I can do the microphone on main. Yeah, there's this HP h Hewlett packard switch that jacks things up, and then streamyard does its best to jack things up the road. The roadcaster board is fine. It's just all these little shit buttons that come in between that that screwed everything up. So that says the speakers of that, and then this is the speakers here. Let me see if I change the speakers

over the main. Sorry, guys, I didn't walk I walked into problems right after I take a nice, friendly, happy poop and come in here, and you get problems, you know. Oh, let's see. If that's the main, then we're to the hell that's the problem. To me, this is set up right. Let me let me just see something. I don't want to mess with things too much because a screw shot up there. All right, all we better know we're worse now, we're even worse.

That's fantastic. All right, let's try this then, m let's try Okay, are we still here? Can you see me again, give me a hello. Yeah, I know, I know it's down. Whenever you make any adjustments on stream Yard while you're in progress, it shuts everything down because it's retarded. It has to do with the browser. But if somebody can tell me if you see me now, otherwise the game's over. Are you nine percent? It's a nine percent? All right. So apparently if

I want to go stereo mode, it makes the microphone super low. Don't ask me why they do that, but yeah, so I have to have echo cancelation on just a stupid setting. Everybody's gay. Everybody's gay, all right. So sorry about the very slow introduction today. We lost our time to place some muzak. We gonna have to get the muzak box. You know, like when you worked at a fast food restaurant that was called the muzak box. They played the same ten songs over and over and over again

until me dud insane. Yeah, good times, especially if you're doing the night shift. Love it. It's too quiet. It's all you have to do this here. That's stupid music. Good times. So let's get into it. We're going to be watching the final installment in that series, called The inter of Ascher logos and it's called The Interconnectedness of Aryan Peoples. And this one was put out about eight months ago. And here we go. This one's one hour and four minutes. So yes, we will have time

to do other stuff. But I have to tell you, I have to tell you. Gotta tell you something. Ready, let me tell you, let me show you something. Actually in the description, I'm sorry. In the chat, very top should still be there, but sometimes Rumble deletes shit. If you scroll to the very top, you should see a link that says I will be going on to FTJ Media Live this night Nation Review and or National whatever night National Review, I think it or something like that,

but I think that's abbreviated for the thing. But it's gonna be at ten am so rate after this, so I have to kind of cut out a couple of minutes early so I can get on with Giuseppi on their stream yard, and then I have to talk about stuff that I'm not an expert in. It's whatever. It's like, I've watched the same stuff, so I can kind of sort of comment on it. All right, So there we go, and so yeah, and it go over to f Tjmedia dot Com

and get yourself an account, super easy to do. If you want to actually upload stuff, then you just have to talk to Josh, which I would highly recommend. Just becoming part of the members, becoming a member of the Telegram group, which is free obviously, but doctor Monzo is in that group. Josh has been in that group. He's an admin, so is doctor Monzo. So yeah, do that. It's called Friends of Ball, Friends of Doctor Monzo and Ballbusterers and what I named it after meeting doctor Manzo.

Yeah yeah, okay, so yeah, it sucks that I can't have

stereo sound and also echo cancelation or just the lack of echo cancelation. But anyway, I wanted to test the music today because I took off this stupid thing that was saying that it was, you know, adjusting the mic settings and I didn't even know it was a new feature that they just decided to add to it, reduced mic background noise, and I think that's what was make the music kind of like sound like a sign wave, like it would get you'd hear it, okay, and then it would like downscale it,

you know, it would like throttle it down, and it sounded like an old cassette tape that was wearing out. Didn't like that feeling, didn't like that sound. Okay, let's get it going. Enough talk, you talk. I kind of wasted all my time to do an intro. They wasted my time. All right, So we're starting this way from the beginning. I will be here to comment. It's begun to lead us all into it. Got a minute. Shut the fuck up. I can't stand YouTube.

Okay, hopefully it doesn't try to jump ahead again bout this and it's not in full screen either. Have we done now? Fuck? Okay, technical difficulty day. It's Friday, Why the fuck not? And we were going I had to readjust from doctor doctor Glinton's awesome talk yesterday, by the way, awesome talk. And I'll be putting it back up on uh FTJ media too. It just for some reason it didn't finish Friday, you know, encoding, So I just have to put it back up there later on.

Ye kind of spun around here. Here we go, let's get started. The year was approximately nine hundred and fifty a d and Emperor Constantinus seventh's elite Barangian guard retained as his private defense force in what seems to have been practically a timeless tradition of virtually all Roman Germanic, but also Persian and Indian and Greek peoples and beyond, stretching back to the dawn of recorded history, took

their positions to do their famous quote Gothic dance. We don't know a great deal of details, but the dance is said to have involved two circles of warriors, one inside the other, moving in opposite directions. Some of the warriors were said to have worn animal skins or masks, while others carried spears or swords, all spurred onward by a periodic and rhythmic chant of Ti,

meaning victory an old Norse. It's said to have both frightened and fascinated all those What was likely an ancient pre battle ritual and a display of martial prowess and a proactive honouring of the ancestors now served the dual purpose of allowing these elite warriors to retain a sense of identity and culture in largely foreign lands as they spread across the vast majority of the civilized world. It allowed them to retain a sense of connection to the route, no matter how far they might

travel. In time and space. These greatest and most proficient of all warriors had a strong connection not just to the Norse and the Vikings, but to their renowned berserkers. In particular, they also obviously had a connection to the Goths. The Goths, in turn were said to have been largely indistinguishable from the Vandals, who in turn were said to be essentially indistinguishable from the Alands

or the Alungi. The Allans were said to have the closest connections with the Scypho Sarmatian people's and the Germanic Swabi, who in turn had the closest connection with the Franks and long Lards. I could go on like this with ease and off the top of my head for twenty to thirty minutes, unabated. Okay, So something that came to light during my study because a lot of

people had asked, did Jacob Frank make that? You know, because his name is Jacob Leeblwitz, right, Jacob Frank Frankism And apparently because the Franks were pushing the whole Catholic thing pretty hard, because of the way they could, you know, it was control right. There's some who speculate that he did, in fact, because Frank was a name that apparently the uh the Turks gave him or whatever to a European merchant, you know, operating in

their territory. So there, and of course he's a merchant, right because he's you know, who knew nook what. But so there's that there's that possibility that that's the name was like a nickname that was adopted, or it also could be that he was trying to uh invoke the that idea that because he's also you know, converting into Catholicism in Christianity by getting baptized, you know, the infiltration, the co opting of the religions, that he was

taking the name of the Franks as well for that reason. So yeah, I guess there is possibly something to that, But how how definitive and how

you know, verified it is? I don't know, the point being that what seems to have been one massive family of people's since become something akin to a people with one hundred names, a people who academics and modern historians studiously labor to break and factionalize into ever smaller charts, which can be helpful in a sense being able to hear the more specific history of a branch of people is informative and valuable, but it also makes us seem like they're unrelated,

and they can then territorialize achievements and take them from the court group. And then it also gives the impression that there isn't a dominating force that was once there that was then destroyed by connivance and trickery. And that's what happened. But it's come at the cost of our beginning to miss the forest for the trees, of our beginning to no longer see the multitude of points of interconnectedness genetically, culturally, linguistically, spiritually, and slowly but surely it's begun to

lead us all into a profound misunderstanding of history. When looking at the vast expanse of human history, the only way to understand it with clarity is to learn, at least to some degree, to view it in the manner that the ancients did. If we take our borders of the present day, our racial groupings or cultural groupings of the present day, an attempt to superimpose these on those people who lived in the same regions in distant times, we'll gradually

develop the most confusing and convoluted picture as a result. Similarly, if we take our modern, politically correct mindset and use this as a prison through which we view history, we'll inevitably experience a similar confusion. One of the things I try to do is speak to ancient times as they were experienced by the ancients, and so far as I'm able. Only when I began to do

this did things begin to make some real sense to me. Only then did various puzzle pieces that had initially baffled me began to fit together and begin to

form something of a cohesive whole. I've come to believe more and more strongly with the passage of time that the peoples comprising the Indo I met a girl like that before, a cohesive whole European language group, those we've alternately referred to as Aryans or Yamnaya, even Scythians by some historians, at various points in time, were once essentially a single family who would go on to spread very far and wide and gradually come to forget, perhaps even be helped to

forget, this common heritage, though there seemed to have been great efforts to avoid forgetting, and I suspect this is one of the reasons why so man. Any of the very oldest documents we possess focus so heavily on bloodline, lineage, and ancestry. Great kings and heroes across vast stretches of time and space so often traced their lineage to the same figures. Of course, today we've taken to claiming that these figures were their quote gods and merely legendary and

mythological. But the ancients seemed to speak of them as flesh and blood heroes. Yes, descended from a royal lineage of lower case g gods, if you will, But this term god seems to be used far differently today than it was in these distant ages. Their own practice seemed something akin to extreme ancestor veneration, more so than what we today think of as religious worship.

One of the reasons adopting this framework proved so incredibly hopeful is that this subset that claimed the most direct descent from these gods seemed to be more often than not immensely capable, men who traveled and migrated across the world to a degree and at a scale that modern academics now claim would have been impossible, despite overwhelming evidence proving them wrong. In the most clear, direct and matter of

fact ways. The Alans or Alani people are just one fascinating example of a great many closely connected to the Vandals and in fact often following them to distant locales, apparently due to the Vandals having a greater degree of dynastic royal blood. This one people could be found everywhere from the westernmost point of Europe to Persia modern Turkey, and even in later times making up the elite royal guardsmen

of the greatest Mongol rulers. The Vandals to a people nearly identical to the Goths, with her gard to ethnicity and in many cultural respects, could be found everywhere from North Africa to the Byzantine Empire, and many argue with traces all the way into China and Far East Asia at least of incredibly kindred and

closely related relatives. In short, the three key points that help bring history to life and create some thoo, it makes sense that there would be like a wild gene in China because you have some you have like a pretty much a stationary, relatively common height of people. Then you have people that sprout up like freaking the jelly green giant. Occasionally that might be a recess of

gene Us like that that finally shows itself. From the influence of this far back logical and rational and coherent picture are firstly the understanding that there was an immense amount of movement and migration of peoples, especially the most capable and successful of the Secondly, that these most successful made up something of an aristocratic caste that were subjugators and rulers and governors over a great portion of the entire world

at any given time. And thirdly, the understanding that the lion's share of this spread of peoples was very similar to what moderns have come to call colonialism, orchestrated by a largely seafaring people who first seemed to create vast trade networks and later helped spark the rise of several nations and empires, especially at the

most major nodes or central hubs of these vast trade networks. Tacitus, in describing a tribe toward the northwest coast of Europe, which would appear to be in the region of Leewarden, Groningen, and Imden, tells us this quote,

hitherto I have been describing Germany towards the west to the north. It winds away with an immense compass, and first of all occurs the nation of the Chaucians, who, though they begin immediately at the confines of the Frisians and occupy part of the shore, extend so far as to border upon all of the several people whom I have already recounted, till at last by a circuit, they reach quite to the boundaries of their cuttons. And the Frisians

are who we're talking about when we go through the oral into book. It doesn't necessarily mean they were only located in that area, but that's the people, and they are all descendants of the same core group. A region so vast the Chaucians do not only possess but fill a people of all the Germans, the most noble, such as would rather maintain their grandeur by justice than violence. They live in repose, retired from the broils abroad, void of

avidity to possess more, free from a spirit of domineering over others. They they provoke no wars, they ravage no countries. They pursue no plunder of their bravery and power. The chief evidence arises from hints that without wronging or oppressing others, they are come to be superior to all, yet they are all ready to arm, and if an exigency require, armies are presently raised,

powerful and abounding as they are in men and horses. And even when they are quiet and their weapons laid aside, their credit and name continue equally high. End. What he seems to be referring to here is an epicenter of the larger Germanic people group, a root of sorts which might be said

to be best represented by those people who reside around Doggerland or Friesland. It's awesome that that core group would be the epicenter would be the Frisians, because when you look at the Earl in the book, you really find a really just a perfect blueprint for how to live and how to appreciate family and all those other wonderful things that go along with it. It's all too perfect. But it doesn't mean it didn't happen. It's just we're so screwed and so

defiled by these people that it seems like a fairy tale. And that's what's said, is that it has become that way that it would actually be unrealistic to us. That's sad, and certainly encompasses parts of the Netherlands of Anglo Saxon, Britain, of Norway and Sweden. And look at look at the the close quarter, like how close it is to Italy, Like I mean, northern Italy, You're going to see this, You're going to see them, and probably in Sicily and Sardinia and all those other places they fund tall

people there too. I mean, this whole area, doesn't it spreads out, And being Italian doesn't mean like you're not potentially of Frisian descent too, And then also being like I'm Italian in German, right, so I could be a little bit of both, or it might be one and the same, just with a tan, because I have Sicilian in me Mark and northern Germany, parts of Switzerland and Belgium, and whose branches seem to extend virtually

everywhere, powerfully into Ireland and Scotland, making up virtually the entire population of Iceland and the Faroe Islands, on into France, Spain, Italy, Eastern Europe, stretching to the Black Sea, and in more ancient times into the Caucasus and the Caspian into Athens and Greece, Ancient Troy, Persia, northwestern

India and into the Taram Basin and beyond. And what the Orlanda book teaches us is that these tribes, when they started migrating, some of them did so because they were cast out, because they were favoring the merchant life, the trade, the buying and selling, and the black magic. So just because they went different places, like when you hear Amin talking about Greece and

these backing cults, those people would not be accepted. These maniacs wouldn't be part of the core group that the Frisians would even recognize as being the same people. It's important to be clear here. This isn't to say that this epicenter was a superior racial subset, standing head and shoulders over those branches extending into so many other regions. After all, it's important to remember a timeless custom of these people seemed to be not just the banishment of their worst,

but often the more prevalent custom. He just said that right there, the banishment of their worst of sending out their best, especially when their domestic and

local success caused such population explosions that things began to get crowded. When this occurred, many of the best and brightest and most adventurous would be periodically sent to distant shores and distant lands as colonists, conquerors, explorers, and settlers, and in some exceptional cases even mercenary warriors or Viking style pirates and raiders who initially at least focused these raids on foreign peoples and long standing enemies.

So when I say that they seem to be an epicenter of this larger family, what I mean is that this seems to be a subset whose culture and traditions caused them to retain the greatest degree of homogeneity and thus continuity, and likely the lowest degree of admixture with outside peoples, both culturally and genetically.

One of the great tragedies of history is that not only is virtually all of it that survives written from the perspective of Romans or Greeks, but that nearly all of the most comprehensive and informative accounts of those peoples lying outside of their borders have been either gradually misplaced or destroyed, or otherwise lost over time, or, as in the case of Cassiodorus's account of the Gothic peoples, has had to suffer through a middleman stage of translation or reinterpretation, and in the

case of Jordanis's Gettica, this isn't even a direct translation at all, but rather, by the author's admission, a very loose account, leaving room for

profound manipulation. If this happened to be part of the goal, much of the most incredible fact, fascinating, informative and intriguing of historical accounts of this sprawling family of peoples, especially prior to around the Fall of Rome, was either never jotted down and retained, or has since disappeared, and it's likely that the remainder perhaps sits heavily guarded and under lock and key in sprawling Vatican

archives or the Herculean Library. Let's hope, Let's hope if things are found, that they actually make it to the public consciousness and not just be squirreled away, shut away from the public eye indefinitely. This massive void, this black hole of history, allows modern academics and historians to begin to spin their tails and weave their webs to creatively fill in the gaps, to create a historical picture that suits modern times, modern culture, and modern sensibilities and sensitivities.

It's my opinion that one of the more upsetting trends of modern scholarship has been the attempt to portray ancient peoples as both exceptionally primitive and exceptionally isolationist, to paint them as living short, brutish lives, filled with fear and baseless superstition, as having difficulty event subsisting, let alone being able to travel great

distances. This is one of those viewpoints that growing up I initially took for granted as truth, but that I've gradually become convinced couldn't possibly be more mistaken. And I feel compelled to make that case, and to speak this truth,

to do whatever I'm able to help counter this trend. Of the hundreds of works tying this larger racial and cultural family of Western mankind to ancient Greece, Egypt, India, or Persia the term Basin or Asia or Troy, for example, nearly all of these are now suddenly, in recent decades, considered frauds or forgeries, or dishonestly written to add to the prestige of this or that individual or people or nation or royal house, or to supposedly manufacture

a link with a biblical past, or merely to excite the reader and make for a compelling story. But the more I've learned, the more I find this tossing out of scores of our oldest historical accounts to be so unjustified as

to be outright strange and suspect. Can you see I know I'm kind of jumping ahead here, but can you see how someone like Adolf Hitler revitalizing the Germanic spirit and bringing people together under a common you know, nationalistic, I don't know, what will you call, like energy whatever, that that would be a great, great disturbance to the controllers of this world because they know, they know, they have an idea of what the history is more than

we do, and they know who their enemies are. They would put them down under a subjifuge to the rest of the people as to why they're actually doing it. But this is a very ancient battle and to see that strengthening on that side was a huge threat, and of course they had to do their best, just like they're rewriting history and omitting stuff and changing it around to make them look like barbarians and British people that just run around, you

know, basically giving them the traits that they have. You know, you know, like kind of like a composite of a Phoenician or a you know, a dirty little pirate, which is what they are giving those attributes to the people who were in complete contrast to them, and thereby sucking them up

into that same collective of evil when it wasn't it was. It was just like what they did with Germany. They're they're changing the attributes they're they're giving them, they're projecting their own crimes onto the people that they're victimizing, and so the story goes around and around we go again, especially considering how many of these passages that speak to these links to far away lands are often short,

matter of fact remarks from ancient historians of the widest variety of different backgrounds, and often buried within a larger work of serious and sober scholarship, as opposed to being part of some document written for a king, for example,

with the obvious intent to glorify his lineage and or solidify his reign. I wouldn't want to suggest this invention of history never happens, of course, in more narrow, specific and exceptional cases, I've seen evidence that it has, and I think the motives behind the pinning of any historical works should always be

strenuously questioned. I even have my reservations about Jordanis's work on the Goths, but I often feel like we're constantly faced with the choice to either believe what our ancestors said about themselves or to believe what modern scholars claim about our ancestors, namely that their own scholars and historians were nearly all liars, exaggerators, or simply stupid and confused, despite the fact that they were far closer to

these major events in both time and space, and of course that they were existing within cultures that still had living traditions passed down through the generations that stemmed directly back to these prior times and major events. Moreover, most of them had no discernible motives to lie. It simply doesn't make sense to my mind, the amount of material we have to throw out, and it wasn't their

nature to do that anyway. Just like I go right back to that same movie, because the name of the movie is where you get the idea of the invention of lying. Like, these people didn't do that. That's why they were swindled so often. Being as powerful as they were militarily warriors,

tough people. They were constantly being betrayed and sabotaged by these little connivers in order to believe this newly formed, freaking weasels forming modern conception is significant, to put it mildly, In this video, I'd like to discuss the topic of the genetic, cultural, linguistic, and spiritual connections between the branches of this larger family tree and present a case as to why there is a great

deal more connectivity then modern academia and scholarship seems willing to admit. And here's the thing too. Ammon was saying that he hopes it's the Palasgians, which is another Scythian tribe, But from what he just showed us in that diagram and how they branched out, and it seems like the core group was coming from the Frisian territory. Why does it have to be Pelasgians? Is that

so that we aren't looking in the right spot? I just I have to always constantly like analyze and you know, scrutinize what people say, especially when they're trying to do it from an assumed position of academia. For sure.

Definitely, then because one the information is not available to us until we all learn ancient Greek, and then we have to figure out whether or not that ancient Greek was said with the specific intent or political aim or drive in order to give us a foul impression of a religion or some other aspect of history. And then you know, is it valid or is it just somebody trying

to corrupt something so that people don't look towards it anymore. Son, And then also to then place that in a different area to pull away once again the migratory tale of our ancestry. Very very many of these, I guess variables are necessary to be like, really really looked at closely before taking anybody's word for it. And I'd like to try to present a picture of how these peoples seemed to see themselves, namely as a familial hierarchy or even dynasty

that gradually spread its wings across most of the world. A proposed to how modern academics are attempting to aggressively reinterpret and reframe this past, where they attempt to break apart and show every conceivable contrast and difference. In this video, I will instead attempt to unify and speak to the striking similarities and beyond coincidence

commonalities. In an attempt to simplify and clarify, I'd like to focus on a handful of key points, starting from the root language of Proto Indo European that seems to lie at or very near the central and starting point of our great journey as a people, and acts as some of the best evidence of this interconnectedness, but also some ubiquitous events and storylines and themes that continually recur across numerous myths and traditions and legends of our varied people groups across India,

per ancient consumer the Norse and Germanic peoples, the Celts, and the earliest Britons, all the way to Biblical accounts. I've come to believe strongly that when variations of a single story purveyed this many cultures and traditions, there's almost certainly a seed of truth to them, and that it's only in bringing these core elements together, piecing these puzzle pieces together, that we might hope to

make some real sense of things. The creation, the paradise, the flood myth, the great progenitor or patriarch figure, the mountain on which the gods are said to have resided the giants or Titans, the mixing of gods with men, etc. Again, whereas modern academia seems obsessively focused on spotting the differences and contrasts my own goal, wouldn't it be funny? And I think there's some truth to this that maybe a colloquial metaphor an idiom meaning somebody of

high stature. There were giants in those days, men of renown right that it was nothing to do with height so much as like, you know, super giant, but you know, relative to like eight foot tall or whatever. But at the whole spinning of the tail of Enoch and all that stuff

having been completely misunderstood, I think that's kind of interesting. Oh will be to speak to the commonalities across all of these traditions, an attempt to show that not only do we likely represent a singular family, but that this singular family seems to have had a relatively singular history stretching back far enough, a history that obliterates the modern conventional model of these completely disparate and unconnected civilizations supposedly

springing up in relative isolation, whose incredible similarities might be blaned away as mere

coincidence or fluke. A technical term often used for my viewpoint here is hyper diffusionism, a term I would define as the recognition that a single tree of related peoples spread across the majority of the world and is responsible for most of the languages we speak today, the bulk of the innovations and technical achievements of the past, the majority of the monuments and structures still extant, stretching from

South America to China and beyond. And it's often paired with the idea that this singular people may ultimately be a remnant of another civilization that seems to have been largely destroyed as a result of massive cataclysm. And this hyper diffusionist perspective is one that's been rejected more and more aggressively in the post World War II era, in large part, I would suggest due to its being politically incorrect.

This singular history helps explain countless things modern historians both fail to explain and thus choose to completely ignore the massive mining operations in places like North America in ancient times. The striking similarity of both construction methods and resulting structures across how they lie is the perfect way to back engineer as to who is lying and for what purpose, and then you kind of get to see who the controllers

are. It's pretty daunting because of how deeply embedded this lie is throughout everywhere. And no greater evil occurred than World War one and two in recent times to totally devastate and change how we look at everything the world. The discovery of a certain out of place genetic type of human being in the most far flung locations where they're not meant to have lived, and the worldwide spread of the branches of a single Proto Indo European root language and its derivatives and branches,

among so many other things. Let me read this to you. To this day, all we have, I say, all we really know about these fascinating people is what we can read in the logs of the Spanish that visited the northern Andes. Probably the most famous quote about the Cloud people comes

from the Spanish conquerors Pedro Sieza de Leon. He wrote that the Cacopoia were the whitest and most handsome of all the people that I have seen, and their wives were so beautiful that, because of their gentleness, many of them deserved to be the Inca's wives, and to also be taken to the Sun

temple. Lorolana, another Spanish conqueror, wrote a similar description and also stated that the Cloud people were much taller than the Spaniards and had extremely light skin and blonde hair, pointing to the fact that they were of European ancestry,

not Mediterranean. These facts continue to puzzle modern day scientists, as there is no evidence of previous European genes being present in this area of the world before the Cloud People, which again the mound builders Scythians created mounds to bury their dead. What do you see and what did you see all over North America

South America right more evidence to their influence and their presence there. Firstly, let's discuss the topic of language, and a lot of those Spaniards, those conquistadores were maybe Spanish sounding names, but they were Sephardic Jews, a lot of them, and they operated like them too. When you get to how they treated the tribal people that they encountered and how they took their children,

and YadA, YadA, YadA, same story. Sanskrit is a fascinating language and a language that very likely lies nearer to the root of the proto Indo European language spoken before this tree branched off throughout the entire world than nearly any

other surviving tone. The oral tradition of Sanskrit speaking peoples was remarkably similar to the Bardic tradition, and that the most important stories and worthwhile histories and myths and legends and tales would be memorized and voiced by an exceptional individual who'd been trained to carry out precisely this task from his earliest days, at times memorizing massive songs or stories or myths, and not just the words, but their

particular manner of delivery, including tone, cadence, intonation, pacing. In their wisdom and foresight, these traditions even created certain rhythm and structure to the speech or song, seemingly to make it easier to remember exceedingly long texts or songs. But you remember what Ammon said about ancient Greek and the mythos It was sung, Well, this predates, So where do you think it?

Game? Where do you think that influence came from? Also, far harder to corrupt or change them in any way, to ensure it would be handed down essentially intact and unchanged across the generations, so that a child may be hearing the exact same song or tale as his great great great great great grandfather. This cultural lineage has been broken, of course, in our day, though perhaps not irrevocably so. Thankfully, though this is a topic for another

time. Countless great thinkers from let me read this one too. This is William Jones. The Sanskrit language. Whatever be its antidi, the Sanskrit language would ever be, its antiquity, is of wonderful structure, more perfect than the Greek, more copious than the Latin, and more exquisitely refined than either prior ages. Marveled at just how strangely familiar Sanskrit felt in comparison to their own European tongues, with many, especially German scholars, hailing it as possessing

an exceptional purity and power, clarity and cleanliness. Of course, this was the same language spoken by the Aryan peoples that swept into India, ultimately irresponsible for authoring what seemed to be some of the oldest works in our tradition, such as the rig Veda. But it may surprise you to know the wealth

of connections between Sanskrit and modern Lithuanian. Lithuanian is considered, oh I'm part Lithuanian as well, to be the closest living sister language of Sanskrit, and it's apparently preserved many features of Proto Indo European that have changed or disappeared in other Indo European languages. For example, a recent dictionary published shows a stunning

one hundred and eight words that are identical between both languages. Both Lithuanian and Slavic peoples have retained the same names for rivers, for example, as Sanskrit.

Even more importantly, most scholars and linguists tend to rank Lithuanian, due to its conservative and unchanging nature, as quite probably the most similar still excellant language to the Proto Indo European root, the seed or tree trunk that lies at the center of the multitude of linguistic branches now spread across the world.

Most scholars seem to agree that the closest relatives of our ancient Proto Indo European root tongue are Lithuanian, Sanskrit, Ancient Greek, Latin, Gothic, and Old Irish, with perhaps an honorable mention to Old Church Slavonic, a Vestin, and Tikerian. If we consider the geographical range covered by these thicker branches of this singular route, this hyper diffusionist frame should start to make some sense.

In my own personal opinion, it's simply undeniable. Looking at the word aryan itself is I believe a fascinating glimpse into this interconnectedness, in large part because it was almost certainly the racial or ethnic designation used by this subset that would later go on to spread so far and wide. Its cognate and Proto Indo European was heroes or hereos, which initially simply meant kinsmen. I like how I said, a member of one's own group is what a hero is,

So I'm gonna read this one or here says. The word hero or heroes derives from the Proto Indo European herios, meaning protector or defender. That's not what I said on the last one said member of one's own group. But this word evolved into the ancient Greek heroes meaning hero or demigod, which was borrowed into Latin as heroes plural. From Latin, the word entered various languages such as Old French hero, Middle English heroes, and modern English hero.

The word heroine, meaning a female hero, was formed in English in the seventeen sex by adding the feminine suffix i to hero. The word heroism, meaning the qualities or actions of a hero, was formed in English in the seventeenth century by adding the suffix ism to hero. The word heroic, meaning brave or noble like a hero, was formed in English in the sixteenth

century by adding the suffix icee to hero. But what's the takeaway here is that it was somebody who was a strong individual, one member of one's own group, meaning they live by their own you know, noble decree. Basically that's what set them apart, or member of one's own group. But would of course go on to evolve into a term of great respect and admiration in our modern hero for an exceptional or courageous individual. Areya or Aryan also most

frequently meant noble or esteem or distinguished or even best. But would go on, Hey, what do you know the word hero in Aryan mean almost the same thing. Isn't that something to mean lord or ruler or master? Likely because as the Aryan people spread far and wide, they traditionally took up positions of great power and influence, including in lands in which they weren't the majority population at times. So think about that World War one and two were fought

against the heroes, the heroes of the world. Yeah, that's awesome, right, I'm seeing that in sarcasm. The Luians, who lived around the region of ancient Troy, seemed to be an early example of this, and the Matani seemed to be another, And in fact, a treatise that uses Sanskrit words was discovered in the archives of the Hittite capital of Bogas Kui.

Excavations in Elmarna in Egypt have yeld to the fact that about the middle of the second millennium BC, kings and princes with typical Vedic names were ruling in the region of modern day Syria. Tutmost the fourth married a daughter of Artatma, who was the king of the Matani kingdom in the Upper Euphrates River area, and during this time in Egyptian history, the ruling aristocracy of Egypt seemed

to be of mixed Egyptian and Matani ancestry. The ethnic and cultural overlap of people stretching from Egypt and the levant through sumer and into ancient India and Persia

was immense in ancient times. The pioneering Scottish polymath, scholar, professor, and explorer Lawrence Austin Waddel, thought to possibly be the inspiration behind the Indiana Jones figure and famous for his theory that sumer Egypt, India and except it corrupted the shit out of Indiana and g owns who goes on and on remember the trope I hate Nazisjia were essentially something of a singular empire across vast stretches

of the most ancient period of recorded history. Even believed the Sumerians, or perhaps at least a ruling caste in Sumeria, spoke Sanskrit, and his evidence that the king's lists published by these people groups are actually different variations of the

same list with the same individuals listed is a fascinating possibility to consider. Waddell, in his work Makers of Civilization in Race and History, claims that Sargon the Great and Menace both repeatedly call themselves and surviving documents gout or got and he believes this much like the people group referenced by the Sumerians as the Guti were the same people who would later come to be known as the Goths.

And he tells us quote and significantly, the princes of this Gothic dynasty over forty three centuries ago already use, as we shall see, the especially Gothic titles of Duke and Earl. Al Right, guys, I'm gonna have to step away for a second because I think some you know, about the kidney stone thing. I think I might have to go, yeah, do something,

but it'll continue to play. Waddell goes on to state, quote, Thus the real date for the first Aryan or Sumerian kings becomes about three three hundred and seventy eight BC, and the real date of Menace, the founder

of the first dynasty of Egypt, becomes about twenty seven three BC. He continues, quote, A vast deal of what has hitherto been looked upon as prehistoric and mythical becomes historic, and real heroes who have been raised into gods again take form as men, and as history early Aryan kings of relatively fixed dates gods and demi gods of the ancient Greeks and Romans, Egyptians and Hittites, Persians and Indo Aryans as well as of the Goths, Scandinavians and Germans,

ancient Britons, Irish and Englo Saxons such as Zeus, Jove, Jupiter, Indra, Prometheus, atmu adamu Adam ad or Odin Cuadell continues quote on comparing these early kings lists with those of the Sumerians and Mesopotamia, I observed that the latter documents also recorded in the self same chronological position the dynasty of King Jin or GUNI or Sargon the Greek, bearing substantially the same names and titles in the Indian lists and in the exact same order, and that the

names and order from Sargon's son Manus onwards were identical with those of Menes dynasty

of pharaohs on their own Egyptian monuments. Mines or Maanj in his Egyptian inscriptions usually bears the title of Man the Warrior, and in the Sumerian kings lists and in his own inscriptions in Mesopotamia, the son and successor of Sargon the Great is styled as Manas the Warrior, and the last king of this dynasty bearing the same name in both Sumerian and Egyptian inscriptions has his name significantly written

on his own Egyptian inscription by the self same Sumerian pictographic signs as in the Sumerian kings lists, and I'm sorry in his own inscriptions as Sumerian Emperor in Mesopotamia. It should also be noted that one of the most common myths, legends, or historical accounts of prior Ais is that of a garden paradise of sorts, a land of milk and honey, in which a population lived in

peace and in great harmony and order and tranquility, surrounded by plenty. This theme is found in several traditions, and in the Biblical tradition, the original garden paradise is called Eden, and the Sumerian term for a plane or step just so happens to be ed in, similar to the spelling of the Scottish eden burgh. Is there a definitive connection here, It's hard to say, but considering how central Sumerio was with regard to the earliest explosion of quote civilization,

it shouldn't be so easily dismissed. If what Waddell implies is true, even partially, so, it changes our entire understanding of history completely and forces us to see things through a new framework. A darkness, A darkness fell is what this is saying. Babylon was inverted, flipped on its head by people who would choose to corrupt and destroy mankind during a great period of peace.

And so it goes with this priest craft. Though importantly, when I cite Waddell or similar figures, I don't mean to insinuate that I agree with his every claim. But what's so frustrating about modern scholarship is that it's become so incredibly dogmatic, so reflexively defensive, that they'll pour over the work of a pioneering thinker like Waddell, the broader picture he so clearly paints and points to, and the hundreds of fascinating possibilities he brings to the table as possible

proofs. They'll then find the one or two technicalities they feel they can most convincingly argue against, laser focus on these, and then treat the entire issue as if dealt with, as if they completely debunked the broader narrative or storyline by disproving to their liking some narrow claim or singular element within it. Or

they'll make something up and then argue that that's not true. They did that with a video that came out and I think the timestamp is like two thousand and seven or two thousand and six about a guy with a weak voice, weasily little dude in a it looks like a lecture hall talking about the fun vacs, the fundamental vaccine and how they were going to transmit it through like

flu shots or whatnot, or flu quote unquote virus which doesn't exist. But and the way they quote unquote debunked it and fact checked it was to say that's not Bill Gates. Well, nobody said it was. They said it was and then said it wasn't right. They made that statement in the negative and said that's not Bill Gates. So therefore everything that that person said in that particular video is no longer of any value, right, But that that

trumps everything that was going on there. That makes it all invalid, because no, you don't understand that's not nobody fucking said it was Bill Gates. We're talking about what the person's telling us is going on, and they're using vaccines in order to transmit, you know, to try to attack the VMAT two gene in people and cut off and sever their teather with God. That was the that was the point of the of the information in that video.

But this isn't how things work, of course. To give a quick example, if a detective comes to me offering one hundred proofs that a man is behind a given murder and I managed to disprove one or two of these one hundred proofs, I've not destroyed his case by doing so. The burden of proof, to some degree is still on me to provide compelling reasons and or

a more compelling case to dismiss the broader claim. Figures like Waddell are so valuable because he provides such a mass of incredibly intriguing proofs, each single one of which seems immensely valuable to any open minded individual seeking to get at the

truth of the matter. Approaching these things as many present academics seem to do as if one is a lawyer arguing for or against a given position is absolutely not the ideal, and it seems the incentive and disincentive structures built into modern academia cultivate precisely this lawyerly and dogmatic behavior, and thus essentially churn out defense

attorneys for the most conventional status quo politically correct or socially acceptable narratives. Dogmatic and partisan lawyerly approaches aren't conducive to uncovering historical truth, to put it mildly, especially when all of these quote lawyers are on a single side of the

ideological fence. And it should be added that Waddell was not only a respected scholar and professor, but one of the first men to actually spend time in these regions like India and Tibet, for example, to meet and talk to people, to learn their spoken languages and to decipher their written languages. I've long felt that a multidisciplinary skill set and approach is absolutely crucial if we ever hope to truly unravel these mysteries and understand our past, because developing a broader

context picture is a must. It's been disappointing, but not the least bit surprising to see that not only do modern scholars disagree with the man, but that they don't even bother to offer counters to his opinions and instead don't dare mention his name or his ideas anymore, acting as if this man who is once the foremost scholar of the history of the region, never existed. If we are operating under the theory that the simplest explanation is most likely to be

the correct one. The idea of a relatively singular people lying at the root of so many incredibly similar cultures, languages, and civilizations makes far far more sense to my mind than the idea of all of these peoples emerging relatively independently with such similar myths and legends and traditions, such similar languages and cultures.

And this simplest explanation is the one that doesn't require that we throw out such a vast number of ancient historical accounts in favor of modern speculations and derivative accounts and what seems to be highly partisan and dogmatic reinterpretations. When modern scholars claim that the Goths originated in Sweden, for example, fair enough, they've certainly had a long standing connection to Sweden, But what do they mean by originated?

Did they spring from the soil fully formed? This doesn't happen, of course, So where were they before this, for example? And why aren't we all more curious? Next, let's briefly discuss spiritual conceptions, which segue nicely from the topic of language. Virtually everywhere we look Amongst ancient cultures and histories, we'll find the concept of the all Father in Vedic Diospetur, in Greek Zeus Petar, and Roman it was Jupiter Anu in the Sumerian tradition,

maybe a Raalda in the Oral in a book variant of these. It's my opinion that the numerous instances of Sun worship are related to this idea, although worship is a tricky word here. I don't think they were actually veneration, seeing this materially existing fiery ball as the sum total of God, but rather the clearest manifestation of His light and power and creative and nurturing energy in our material realm. Ancestor worship and the worshiping of archetypal deities has always made perfect

sense to me in this same regard. Again, the term worship shouldn't convey images of people devotedly believing that these ancestors, or these archetypal gods, or the end all be all of creation, or the singular creative force behind it all. But it's all important to understand that the concept of a God that flows and courses through all creation and in a sense is all creation, is impossible for our minds to fully and rationally grasp. It's a bit like looking

at a pure white light, completely lacking in any differentiation or contrast. Our minds need individuation, We need things to grasp. If we added some black, we might create something of a yin and yang differentiation, and immediately things can become clearly recognizable. Or if you separate this white light into primary colors,

these are things we can easily and readily understand and grasp. And perhaps if we were able to honor each primary color in precisely equal measure in this analogy, and as derivatives and outgrowths of the one pure white light, we'd achieve a slightly better holistic understanding of our creator, whose total nature defies language

and defies perfect conscious understanding. The danger, of course, taking any one of these colors as the god all, or taking any singular archetypal concept as the utmost in my belief, this leads to disjointed and asymmetric thinking and thus disjointed and unbalanced being, and calls us to straight from the center point. It does seem to me that the further back we look evidence of a singular conception of father or an all Father or other words, the Zoroastrian tradition in

Persia clearly speaks to this. Works like the Bagavat Gita masterfully speak to the singular nature of God. The later Germanic people speak of an all Father, just as the or Linda book speaks of Roalda Jesus speaks of his father. Even Buddhism and speaking of Dharma, recognizes a singular all pervasive law, and

a singular order behind all things. I've come to believe that a great deal of these now varied beliefs ultimately emerged from a single route, and just like the variety of cultures and languages that arose due to time and geographical separation,

differences in understanding and interpretation of belief arose. Similarly, Doctor Churchward, in Signs and Symbols of Primordial Man, holds that the ancient Druids quote were undoubtedly descendants of the ancient Egyptian priests who came over and landed in Ireland and the West of England, and who brought with them their religious doctrines and taught and

practiced them here. The Tuatha Didnan, the princes or descendants of Diatinion, the Fire God or the Sun who came to Ireland were of the same race and spoke the same language as the Furbuls or the Fomarians. Possessed ships, knew the art of navigation, had a compass or magnetic needle, worked in metals, had a large army thoroughly organized, a body of surgeons, and

a Bardic or druid class of priests. These druids brought all their learning with them, believed and practiced the eschatology of the Solar doctrines, and came from Egypt. End The connection and overlap between Druid, barred a scene and Magi, even Pythagorean and Zoroastrian, is extensive, again seemingly testifying to a great deal of interconnection across a vast territory, and the connection of the Celts to

ancient Egypt also seems extensive and formerly well documented. As wild as this may sound to the modern ear, this was a topic much more casually discussed by historians of prior eras. It's unfortunate that I don't know quite enough about languages and the broader field of linguistics to make more definitive determinations with regard to etymological

connections. Here, But I find it fascinating that so many ancient works, especially dealing with spiritual matters, speak of the waters or the breath of God that moves through all things. Lawrence Waddell even speaks of whom he believes to be the first ever Aryan king, as having the royal title of quote bestower of the waters of life. The Orlanda book speaks of Iowa. The fascinating Colbrin Bible speaks of Awen. The ancient Germans had a term called iwi and

forgive my pronunciations meaning vital force or life. This is also said to be the language root of the prefix ae as an as here or as used as part of ancient Germanic names like athel red or Ethelbald, which essentially marked them out as nobility. There also seems to be a strong connection between names like Adele or Adole and names beginning with Atl or at h. These are said to indicate nobility, but also, according to many accounts, to signify a

quote covenant. Names like Athena or Athens, Atharic, Athelstan a naming convention as commonly used by the Goths, as it seems to have been by the

Fhriyans or Phrygians and later Anglo Saxons. There may well be an indirect connection to Atlantis buried here, as well as a connection to the atl naming device hot Land, as used by the ancient South American peoples, as exemplified by their bearded and fair skinned civilization, bestowing god Kexlquadal, who was said to have arrived from the ocean on a craft resembling dragons or snakes, which of

course might bring to mind Phonetian and Viking ship designs. These connections may sound a bit wild to some on their face, but from the perspective of the larger context picture, I assure you they seem anything. But I've long been fascinated with both Ae and atl when used in names of either individuals or places, it seems to simultaneously have a strong connection to both physical water and a

spiritual conception of waters and the gods and the nobility. And to return to the idea of the seer for a moment, many have speculated that this may have a direct connection to the modern name Azerbaijan, as this region certainly correlates with where these gods or illustrious men were meant to have once resided aes or ees is the root of how Germanic peoples and even Old English referred to God

or the plural god men perhaps who may well have been ancestors. I don't understand that sans By, who have been the oldest priesthood around since quote time in memorial, they are such close homological resemblance to this essay, and it's they both terms have influenced by the pro Indo European root and part mironus. We're no longer certain how this word sounded, but asure, which means life force or spirit. Next, I'd like to speak to another controversial subject,

made controversial post World War Two because hyper diffusionist and the politically incorrect. In all of my years pouring through historical accounts, I've come across what I feel is overwhelming evidence of an ancient aristocratic cast that seems to have been accepted as the rightful rulers and governors and even many peoples of different backgrounds in exceptional cases. And it's deeply interesting how interconnected these two terms aristocracy and aryan seem to

be. This lineage would go on to spread across vast distances peoples and cultures with the march of time. But we constantly find it being wreckgized by populations and nations and touted by those who possessed it across virtually all histories. Zoroasfrance

scholar Farhengmayer puts it this way in speaking to ancient Persian Aryan practices. Quote implicit in the references to ancient Arians in the literature is the development and establishment of a national governance through the establishment of a hereditary kingship and a royal line. In this system of governance, Aryan kings had a sacred responsibility to protect the people, establish and uphold the law, encourage human development, and lead

the progress of society to a better life. When Rian kings maintained this sacred trust and ethical compact what in modern days we call a social contract, they were said to rule and grace in keeping with their far enough, you can you can tell when he you know, recorded a session at different time,

because you can hear how the the voice changes a little bit. The contrast between the attempt at wholly benevolent rulership episodes of the history of the de Larussi right the Russian so frequently found in Aryan peoples and cultures relative to and contrasted with figures like Nimrod or Ninus or the traditional conception of the tyrannical asiatic ruler is certainly a stark one. The latter is ravenous, parasitic, insatiable,

and seemingly wholly self interested. The former, in its ideal, was intended to see himself as something of the father of a household or nation or his people, and his success was their success. That's hugely important. That's for you a difference as well. But that idea, why does communism want to destroy family so badly? Why do they want to destroy the children? Might want to just break up the family. The mother that has a different role.

Now the father is just some idiot, right that. Why do they do that? Because that's the core strength of any people. And when an entire nation or an entire tribe or whatever you want to call them a people have a communal family bond, there's that's an almost impenetrable thing. And that's

why the erosion by the priestcraft occurs. Is highly speculative, admittedly, and a product of educated guesswork and intuition based on an attempted summary and distillation of the many accounts I've been able to find and read over the years, but I feel like I've seen evidence that this lineage split into two major groups, as I've hinted at past videos, which might be represented by a wagon wheel on one hand and a ship's helm or wheel on another, because one group

was one that we might call essentially land based and perhaps best represented by Royal Scythian or lineages like the Gothic, Amal or Balthy ruling lines, and the other sometimes referred to as sea kings, whose genetic lineage we almost certainly have evidence of today in the R one b U one O six haplogroup, and

this latter group opens up a fascinating chapter of history. Those peoples we've come to lazily refer to as Phonetians as an all too broad blanket descriptor the earliest manifestations of whom were almost beyond any shadow of a doubt of R one B lineage and have a strong connection to those peoples we call Celtic today, but perhaps equally strong to this R one b U one lineage, which most consider Germanic in contrast to its being Celtic, but in my view, it may

well be both. This is one of the many reasons I took the Orlanda Book so seriously and still do, as it seemed to tally so clearly with what I'd long assumed to be the case, and helped fill something of a historical void and black hole with regard to peoples whose history almost seems to have

been erased to some degree. Ancient Athens, especially in Hellenic and pre Hellenic times, seems to have been very clearly one of the ancient epicenters of this sea going aristocracy, which is yet another thing that may lend further credence to the Orlanda, as well as the fact that the final or present day epicenter of this R one b U one O six lineage seems to essentially be in

or near modern Friesland. It says. It should be noted that the earliest and most major settlements or incursions into Britain show an extremely strong Frisian genetic connection, as do those, interestingly, of many of the earliest settlements in America, especially around New York formerly New Amsterdam. Also, we can't forget that a man by the name of ika Inca in the Frisian orlanda book set sail, never to be written of again. And then we have the incas right,

is that a coincidence? And it would make sense that there wouldn't be anything written of him anymore if he didn't go back right, So, and then you have that cloud people story that we just heard about. It's pretty interesting and may well represent the people group that provided the seed population that helped launch the vast ocean going trade empires, both the English and the Dutch, and correlated seemingly so heavily with the ocean and coastal mastery of the Norse and

Vikings. But to avoid too much digression, I'd like to discuss the wealth of histories that tie the most ancient form of those peoples we've come to call Celts to Anatolia, Phoenicia, Egypt and this broader surrounding region, and there are many. What seems to occur more often than not is that these will be dealt with one by one by academics in isolation from the broader context picture

and dismissed by these modern scholars as wild and fanciful. But this becomes much much harder to do when you see how many varied accounts there are, and how these accounts don't seem fabulous in the least in their totality, but rather matter of fact, and how so many of these seem to speak of several different facets of this Celtic and ancient Phoenician connection, indicating that they can't all

spring from one root lie or misunderstanding or exaggeration. Again, calling it a Celtic Phoenician connection may be a misnomer, as these ancient mariners seemed to possess R one B elements that seamlessly straddle the line between both Celtic and Germanic, and so often the more ancient separation between these two peoples can seem a bit forced and artificial. But perhaps calling this lineage majority Celtic and minority Germanic might

be fair. After all, the number of descendants that spring from R one b U one O six specifically are certainly vastly outnumbered by their descendants from much

larger R one B families. And yet wherever U one O six roamed in particular, power and success and seemingly a high level of general competence seemed to follow, the Phoenicians, or those we've chosen to lump under the import options are easily one of the most important and fascinating keys to our collective history, and I've come to believe strongly that they were initially and yet didn't remain a

singular and relatively homogeneous people group, either ethnically or culturally speaking, but rather picked up a very foreign element along the way and thus gradually became something very

different over time as result. Interestingly, the Aura Linda speaks of Phoenicia being used almost as a deportation area and as a refuge for their criminals and cast offs, and rather matter of factly in speaking of the slave would make a lot of sense, especially when we consider who claims heredity to these Phoenicians lightly

later, and also indicates that they are the same people. But they were the ones that were cast out, So they became the thieves, they became the pirates, they became the child abductors and human traffickers, the drug traders, same as it ever was after that, right, but also the practitioners of very dark magic. They were completely corrupted by that or Phoenicians calls them a qual I mean, just look at Carthage quote Bastard Race, and it's

mentioned openly in more than one account or side on. I mean pick a place that the Phoenicians picked up the practice of slavery at some point and subsequently began freely mixing with the peoples they'd enslaved, which may help explain this even as early as Homer's time, the description of some Phoenicians. Oh and by the way, mixing with the people who would totally make it again, not a did the tribe who calls themselves a race and religion would not be true.

It would be a mixed multitude, as they say. And again, as I'd stated before, and I've argued, it's not a race, it's a convenient race, because then they can say that the chosen ones. You can't claim ownership of being chosen unless you have some kind of ethnic you know, commonality, right, So it kind of it's necessary for them to claim that you have turk, you have all kinds of stuff mixed in with that. It's with darker skin or hooked noses seemed common, but it's likely the

vastness of their trade routes that best explain this phenomenon. In the course of their mercantile operations, they have encountered a multitude of different peoples and cultures, and likely even acted as the vehicle for their movement to distant locations. More often than not, it's simply inevitable in a case like that of the Phoenicians, in which they traveled and traded and mingled so far and wide, that if such a people don't have an extremely strict or disciplined code of conduct or

powerful and deeply rooted cultural traditions, they're simply bound to degenerate. And I'm going to say that, even though people like Amine want to say that the epitome of everything is ancient Greek, I think this is a falling away from

the more pure frisian if esque type of society. And whether or not their language was intricate and wonderful and all that other great stuff, that all might be true, but that might lend, you know, it might be owed to what came before it, before it became you know, hellenized in a sense, because I think at that point you're already looking at the corruption, pretty deeply and very widespread of this type of the drugs, the cult,

the the strange rights and rituals, the black magic, the magic at all. That would not be that would not drive so they've they kind of wandered off in a way already it degraded. Even though they might have high culture, that doesn't mean they weren't a degradation as far as spiritually and morally and

ethically from their origins. And I think that's what you see when they migrate, is that there's a degradation that occurs, and then some really profound degradation when you see like the Phoenicians and things of that like that, and to eventually come to serve money and personal gain above all else, and thus to gradually watch their culture disappear and morph into something very different, and I would

suggest, very hollow. It's said the Greeks began to use the term Phoenician for anyone that manipulative, engaged in quote sharp dealing, for deceptive practices. Late Carthage, for example, has come to be known largely for its perfidy, its child sacrifice, and its almost complete lack of art, of high

culture, of martial prowess, and of general grace and refinement. An unnatural hodgepodge nation that would gradually come to be dominated and controlled by a merchant class oligarchy, which the Romans finally and mercifully would eventually put out of the misery.

A great deal of valuable research has finally seen the light of day just before the publishing of this video, throwing significant weight behind the theory of an exceedingly strong connection between modern Europeans and an Indo European past, helping liberate our history from the tiny pockets of forested Europe so many modern academics seemed intent on

wholly confining two. The bulk of the latest findings center around the all important yam Naya, from whom the corded War seemed to largely descend, and who might be said to be one of the best labels or definitions of the core of this Indo European people whom we formerly called Aryan prior to World War II, making it so dangerously unfashionable regardless of where one falls on the countless specifics

of this they had to demonize it forever. And when you actually get into the true history of that man and that war, like we did with the Europa series, especially episode four, I mean, there's nothing, there's nothing there there, you know what I'm saying. There's nothing for them to hang all this hatred on. It's just straight projection of what they were doing to them as they were hunting them into extinction. And yet we have such a

flipped up, upside down an inverted perception of things. It sucks story that remained to be definitively determined. I believe were finally at the point in which the broader strokes can be voiced with some confidence. As historian Will Durant well phrased it, and speaking of the Indian branch of the Aryans, quote, the invasion and conquest of these tribes by the Aryans was part of that ancient process whereby periodically the North has swept down violently upon the settled and pacified South.

This has been one of the main streams of history on which civilizations have risen and fallen, like epical undulations. The Aryans poured down on the Dravidians, the Achaeans and Dorians, upon the Cretans and Jeans, the Germans upon the Romans, the Lombards upon the Italians, the English, upon the world. Forever. The North produces rulers and warriors, the South produces artists and

saints. End quote. It's certainly true that one of the most obvious themes running through the entirety of the ancient historical record is that of a people to the north, full of energy and vitality and impressive competence and ability, going where they pleased when they pleased, and either felling or creating nations and empires in their way. Modern scholarship seems to be finally coming close to acknowledging this, however slowly and be grudgingly. But I think many are even still missing

a key point. But with a spin, you see, it doesn't matter what comes to the surface, it matters how they spin it and try to reinforce what they've already claimed. That's when they're in control of the information and how it's spread. They're in control of how it's spoken to. These warlike invaders are constantly portrayed as brutish and brutal destroyers as opposed to creators warriors. And once again, look at Germany World War two, what were they portrayed

as portrayed as but never cultivators or builders. I think this misses the idea that these waves of Indo Europeans emanating from what seems to have once been a central core, had been striking out into this great unknown for as long a period as we have any history, and that there were countless such waves.

In fact, these waves seemed to compound and build upon one another. In other words, an early wave might have pushed into an India or a Greece, only to then be followed a few hundre years later by yet another wave of genetic kin, yet of people whose culture may now appear more wild, untamed, even brutal, because the perspective of the more settled peoples of the

earlier wave had gradually changed with time and a different mode of living. There's an absolutely fascinating domino effect created by these waves, which we might even say extended all the way to the time of Attila and ginghis Khan. In some sense, as will cover in the next videos, a cyclical dance in which brother and cousin peoples cascade upon and push one another ever further, and expansion and population pressures gradually push this family across the majority of the known world.

One thing is certain the story of the Indo European people, who almost certainly spring from a relatively singular route not more than a mere five to six thousand years ago, perhaps after some massive cataclysm caused a major reset in major population Bottlenet. Yes, it is perhaps the single most incredible, fascinating, powerful and important story in human history. And it's a story that the vast majority of remains to be told, a story that only now we're beginning to pick

up the traces of to cobble the pieces together. Can you not see how the Abrahamic trio does its best to muffle muffle out because nothing is important prior to it, right, it's a way of completely not even just it's shifting the focus away from this and who's in control of the Abrahamic three and to formulate into some coherent narrative. It's safe to say that no family of people's has been more consequential, more impactful, more adventurous, and courageous and all

pervasive. It was that's you they're talking about. Majority of us out there, that's you they're talking about. So take some take some pride in this, Okay, feel good about where you come from for once, especially Germans out there, you fellow Germans out there, you fellow Italians out there, you fellow Europeans out there. And that's not to put anybody else down, but I mean, we should understand who we are before we start trying to figure out other people. I would, I would think, and they should

do the same for themselves. Everybody should be restoring their culture. It's just the physical gifts of a larger stature that led to their success. These were true pioneers, inventors, and that uniquely curious and energetic type that always and everywhere pushes the envelope with a burning, innate, insatiable desire to explore, to understand, and in my opinion, to create what they saw as a just and natural order and the conditions for a longer term flourishing in their way.

In my opinion, we are collectively standing at the earliest stages of and taking our first steps toward piecing together what I believe may be the most interesting story in the world. And the more we come to understand here, the more we'll ultimately come to understand about ourselves, about our journey, our own character and wiring, our heritage, and perhaps even our very direction and purpose.

As dark as things may seem right this moment, our journey is far from over, and in fact, it may well be that we are just getting started. We have work to do, but that shouldn't be daunting, that should be inspiring, all right, a couple of two three things, and then we'll be closing this out a little bit early so I can prepare for going out with JESSEEPI. Over on the FTJ media side. I'm also broadcasting over there too. There's something called the Flood that's going on right now.

It's another show from I believe the source would be sfr FTJ Media, but it's on the FTJ remedia right now. It's a live stream the Flood. It's called Feurer Friday. I thought that was kind of funny, stealing away my audience because I'm not trying to compete with anybody anyway. Let's go over to well, was I going to show you stuff? Definitely stuff, all right? So in the Patreon as we were talking, and I actually dropped a couple of these links as well into the live chat here on Rumble.

But I put I put out, isn't that cool? I'm not I'm not prude, all right. So it says waddle Waddell, right, Lawrence Waddell, the guy that they were talking about, Lawrence Austin Widdell. I found a few books of his that so the first one up on top, which should be the last one I posted, but this is the origin of the area Afflabat. I had to be careful how I wrote it on Patreon, but there you have it, ninety eight pages. It's a short read.

Might be someplace to start. The British Edda, which is a This is actually a zip file with four pdf files and four parts. Right, that one is definitely something you want and check out. And then Makers of I had also cut this down just because I didn't want to write all but Makers of Civilization in Race and History and this is one of many books by Lawrence Bodell, and that one is seven hundred and something pages. So this

is where the meat and potatos are. Right. Every time we do these shows, if I can find the free PDFs as we're watching, I try to do that. So if you see me moving around and doing things, it's because I'm trying to provide the resources of references that they are bringing up in conversation during their documentary or whatever you want to call that. And looks like we picked up another free person there. That's good, right, So

there you have it. There's more stuff on here. There's lots of PDFs on here now, okay, okay, And if you before I close down the live chat. There also check out the two links. So the makers of Civilization in Race and History is up there, and so is the area and origin of the alphabet in the live chat for Rumble. Okay, that way, you can just click them if you want them. And I think that goes direct. I don't think that goes to archive dot org. First.

I think that's just supporting the thing. But I think it goes right to that PDF page that you can download the direct connect. Like when you're on your phone and there's something that says pdf find it and you click it and already starts to download it. Yeah, something like that. All right, So there we go. We're gonna be on FTJ shortly here with you know who. So it's gonna be fine. Let me see if I can should show you where it is should be should be saved here? Wait,

is that the wrong one? That's good? Uh? Yeah, it's sorry, I don't I don't freaking know it's whatever. All right, So anyway, let's go back over here real quick. We have to show you this beautiful thing. All right. I'm moving. I'm leaving on the twentieth to go to New York that's eight days from now. I have to I have to make a huge amount of hot sauce and bring the San Diego before that's

over. That might interfere with next week's broadcast, just so you know, but give sendgo dot com backslash b A A L B U S T E R S Okay, Please support the show. Please support the show if you want to do it through Patreon. These are all in the descriptions for Rumble and for FTJ Media as well. The only place you don't see these things is on Twitter because there's no body of type that you can put in with

a stream. So if you're on Twitter and you're interested, go check out the Rumble or the ftjmedia dot com backslash channel backslash Ballbusters, which I also have in the description of Rumble. Now, so all of you out here

listening, go make a log in and subscribe over to FTJ Media. It's the reincarnation of josh u TV, but made even better with more support, and it's going to be the new force to be reckoned with because it's a real free speech platform, which means these silent these voices will not become silenced despite all their efforts. Because they control all the other platforms, so they decide when to shut you off. That's not going to happen over here.

So just understand that when everybody starts to disappear, look for them on FTJ mediu and you know it would be the best way to do that. Start your count over there now and start you know, maybe even watching from there if the if the stream is uh is solid. The only problem with that is if you want to right now with the live chat, you'd have to be on Rumble for me to see what your comments are. Okay, so there's that. So disguiselimits, Patreon dot com, backslash disguise d I S

g U I S E the limits. All right, this is another way to support the show. You can go to PayPal dot e backslash ball Busters. You can do it that way directly, or you can go to that GoFundMe that's in the description as well. That's also another way to do it. Try and think, just buy me a coffee. There's all these other ways to do to help the show. Okay, all is appreciated. I have this thing, like I said, I'm going to be doing so ten

days out in New York with my daughter. I haven't seen my family in forever. Should be interesting, should be good, should be a nice bonding experience. I can't wait personally, but also at the same time, I can certainly wait six hundred lifetimes before getting on another plane after all the freaking craziness that's been going on. Don't feel too confident about that. If anybody's looking for a Perthday gift for me, this would be great. August twenty

eighth. But anyway, so this is a breaking intensive course, second edition by Hardy Hansen and Gerald m quinn. So there you go, paperback, don't get the hardcover, that would be cool. Anyway, There you go, and I think we're good. I can only have ten minutes before I have to get back on so I can't drag this out too long. You guys have a wonderful day. All that's always appreciated. Thank you for showing up, Thank you for caring about this stuff that I find is very important

and I hopefully do too. And it doesn't I hope everybody understands too that if you're green, brown, orange, or whatever, this is not saying that there's something better than you. It's just this is what I am. So this is what I'm interested in, what you are. You should be interested in too, in finding out the truth about because they were lied about you too. They lied about everybody to make us small, to make us insignificant, and to make us barbarians so that only they are the enlightened,

chosen people. That's what you have to remember. Let's reunite and restore our own cultures together and together become allies against the true evil. Love y'all. Bye,