Money Saved By Canceling Programs Does Not Immediately Flow To The Best Possible Alternative - podcast episode cover

Money Saved By Canceling Programs Does Not Immediately Flow To The Best Possible Alternative

Feb 10, 202512 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

I.

PEPFAR - a Bush initiative to send cheap AIDS drugs to Africa - has saved millions of lives and is among the most successful foreign aid programs ever. A Trump decision briefly put it “on pause”, although this seems to have been walked back; its current status is unclear but hopeful.

In the debate around this question, many people asked - is it really fair to spend $6 billion a year to help foreigners when so many Americans are suffering? Shouldn’t we value American lives more than foreign ones? Can’t we spend that money on some program that helps people closer to home?

This is a fun thing to argue about - which, as usual, means it’s a purely philosophical question unrelated to the real issue.

If you cancelled PEPFAR - the single best foreign aid program, which saves millions of foreign lives - the money wouldn’t automatically redirect itself to the single best domestic aid program which saves millions of American lives.

https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/money-saved-by-canceling-programs

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android