Pro-Con Debate | Peer-review: Is it an Unnecessary, Dispensable Process with Alternative Options or Fortifying Scientific Rigor? - podcast episode cover

Pro-Con Debate | Peer-review: Is it an Unnecessary, Dispensable Process with Alternative Options or Fortifying Scientific Rigor?

May 08, 202410 minSeason 21Ep. 13
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

"Pro-Con Debate | Peer-review: Is it an Unnecessary, Dispensable Process with Alternative Options or Fortifying Scientific Rigor?" by Ratan K. Banik, MD, PhD, and Ashlyn V. Brown, MD, MBA, MS. From ASRA Pain Medicine News, February 2024. See original article at www.asra.com/feb24news for figures and references. This material is copyrighted. 






Support the show

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast
Pro-Con Debate | Peer-review: Is it an Unnecessary, Dispensable Process with Alternative Options or Fortifying Scientific Rigor? | ASRA News podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast