The (micro)grid of the future

I'm teaching this class on energy systems. And I thought to myself, I want to give my students an example of how they can take action at. levels other than the federal level. And I think the exact same fall, I had a student walk in my office from California and said, I want to write my thesis on community choice aggregation. And I was like, well, what is community choice aggregation?

And then the exact same week, I think, I got a flyer on my door saying that my town was going to choose to do community choice aggregation. Welcome to Ask MIT Climate. I'm Madison Goldberg. Our guest today is David Sue. I'm an associate professor of urban and environmental planning here in the Department of Urban Studies and Planning at MIT. And most recently I've been studying the future of electricity and gas. Before talking with Professor Sue, I had never heard of the first.

Community choice aggregation. Even though it turns out I'm actually getting cheaper and cleaner electricity from it myself. We'll explain how it works a little later. But here's the key thing to know for now. It's an example of how a county or city or town can hold some sway over where their electricity comes from. Which gets us to our topic for today. Professor Sue is going to tell us about ways of getting power to people that are much more local than big utility-driven grids.

And we'll learn what these local models have to offer as the world strives to build cleaner, more affordable, and more accessible energy. But first, a bit of history.

Well we credit as the first kind of small grid. Uh was built by Thomas Edison. It was a factory in Lower Manhattan, but also lit restaurants and stores. And I don't think it was more than probably 100 or 200 lights. But we actually consider that the grid because that's one of the first times they tried to build a district that had electricity circulating between multiple establishments. So in these early days of electric power, a handful of businesses could join forces to run a power plant.

Or famously, one of the earliest installations that Thomas Edison does is in JP Morgan's house. So JP Morgan is like one of the richest men in the world. And if you were as rich as JP Morgan, you could basically have your own miniature power plant. Morgan had a steam engine installed on the grounds of his manor. But by the early 20th century, electricity was not just for business owners and the ultra-wealthy.

Power plants got bigger, making more and cheaper electricity, and electrical lines got longer so that power could reach more customers. And this is where electricity becomes democratic. And what you start to see is people start using electricity in factories.

Then people s realize that it's actually good for expanded electric lighting. It turns out electric streetcars complement lighting nicely because streetcars are busy during the day and lighting is only active at night. So you can use the same power plan for both. So you start to have all the building blocks electric grid we have today. And that basic logic of sharing big centralized power plants to keep costs low.

has shaped power systems around the world. It's why most people get electricity from big utilities and not from the mom and pop power plant next door.

But as energy technology changes, households, neighborhoods, and cities are thinking about ways in which the age-old logic might not always hold. Take the rise of solar panels and batteries. I've had solar panels for about 10 years. It's a super sunny day right now. I know I'm generating electricity. And frankly, you know, electric cars are basically uh battery on wheels. So I could theoretically run my house off my

electric car for two or three days. And so what you start to get now is this behavior called grid defection. The system is providing a hundred percent reliable power whenever people want it. And then the people who can afford to buy solar and storage can basically choose not to use that and not pay into the whole system as everyone else for certain times of day when it's expensive for everyone else.

So there are tensions here. What do more local ways of making and distributing power offer that the large centralized grid doesn't? And what about the other way around? These questions are the most urgent where the grid isn't serving people reliably. A lot of places that don't have electricity systems that are fairly well developed, sometimes the quickest way to get electricity is to simply build a microgrid or a community level project.

A microgrid works like that grid Edison built in Manhattan. You have a local power source and wires sharing the power close by. Maybe within one neighborhood or one town. Often, these microgrids link to the wider grid but can also detach. So they don't suffer blackouts, for instance, when a storm takes down a distant power line. This isn't a brand new concept, but it's growing. Partly because with solar and battery power, you can now use state-of-the-art technology at any scale you want.

The nature of solar and storage is that it's modular. And so if you look at a solar farm with like 10,000 solar panels, that's basically the same as the 30 panels I have my roof. And today that's helping to bring electricity to people who haven't had access to it. I went to this village and maybe thirty or fifty homes in Jharcon and India. This community chose to build with a NGO partner, they chose to build a local microgrid.

It had a cafe because the microgrid enabled them to serve cold drinks. I saw a little industrial workshop where people had a rice holler, like farmers would bring in their rice, and I think it would take the husk off the rice. Desires for improved standard of living was television. And this is like a great improvement of their standard of living, like local industrial uses, that's like economic development. And then just being able to watch a projected image.

in a cafe while having a cold drink is something that people didn't have before. Microgrids and other small solar installations are popping up around the world, especially in South Asia and Africa, and in island nations where large grids are harder to build. And as these new approaches roll out, Professor Su says it's important to figure out whether a local option will be able to meet people's needs and continue meeting people's needs as electricity use grows.

I think the question is in developing countries, how do you think development's going to happen faster? Do you think That the central government or the regional government can build the grid and serve everybody to the level we expect. Or do you want to give people the ability to simply buy the resources they need? And you see this in places like India or Pakistan. People are voting with their feet.

They don't believe that the central grid operator is gonna provide electricity reliably enough. And if you're wealthy enough or even middle class in Pakistan, it's a better deal for you to buy a solar panel.

It may not lead to the same grid we have today in the United States, but the grid we have today, frankly, is not really as reliable and resilient as we want it to be. So This is not only to say that Kenya and India might follow a different path in the future, but it's also to say that the United States is gonna make a different set of choices itself about reliability, resilience and cost in the future. For instance, the US is also adopting microgrids.

On Kodiak Island in Alaska, a microgrid brings reliable power where the larger grid can't penetrate. In Montgomery County, Maryland, it's an emergency measure to prevent blackouts. In Puerto Rico, microgrids are a response to service interruptions, which are much more frequent there than on the U.S. mainland. And extreme weather worsens the problem. In 2017, severe hurricane damage left Puerto Rico facing the longest blackout in US history.

And so I've worked with a lot of local communities in Puerto Rico that are trying to build microgrids because they don't necessarily trust the electricity system.

But even without splitting off from the larger grid, a growing number of communities are using new energy technologies to adopt more local control. We finally come back to community choice aggregation. Or C C A for short. Is a policy by which local governments can sign a power purchase agreement and they can choose where to get their power from. The utility still

Owns the wires, the wires that come into your house, the wires that distribute electricity in your city or town. And customers still pay for that service on their utility bills. But in a CCA, a city or town or group of towns gets Make the decision about who to buy their electricity from. And the utility has to serve that purchase on the same wires everyone else is using. Massachusetts became the first state in the US to allow CCAs in 1997. And it's spreading fast.

If you look at Massachusetts, I think more than half the cities and towns, the entire state, have organized this. California, which is the biggest state, I think is getting close to 40% of the population, has signed up for community choice aggregation. This growth happens to coincide with another big change in our energy system. That's kind of been a happy accident. when CCA started, which is greener power has generally been cheaper and getting cheaper all the time.

So, a lot of CCAs have embraced wind, solar, and battery power often faster than their utilities were. At the same time, their growth hasn't always gone smoothly. Some towns have swung between having CCAs and getting rid of them. And like with homes getting rooftop solar, there has been friction between CCAs and the wider grid.

In California, utilities have complained that it's hard to charge CCAs fairly for their use of the shared wires, and to engage with CCAs to make sure there's enough spare supply for everyone else. You might also ask if local governments are in the best position to deal with some of the big challenges our energy system faces today. We have electricity demand growth across multiple sectors, not only data centers and AI, which is happening very fast.

But we also have electric vehicles, electrication of buildings. These are all going to demand more electricity. These are all macro grid problems. Utilities have access to cheap capital, they have economies of scale, they actually have construction crews that put stuff in the ground and they already operate the system. So those are four pretty big advantages that no individual city or town wants to try to recreate those things.

The logic that big power plants and big transmission lines are the cheapest, fairest, and most reliable way to meet demand is still very strong. And yet we also have challenges and opportunities at more local scales. Solar panels and batteries can be deployed almost anywhere. The growing fleet of electric cars needs somewhere to charge. People need reliable power amid worsening extreme weather.

And Professor Sue believes newer local models could let people experiment with solutions that a large utility can't or won't try. You know, C C A is just a mechanism for a community to decide where it wants electric electricity from. Yeah, some communities are choosing greener power. But some people want things like cheaper power, some people want local job guarantees. Boston has put in place its own rate structures to help. some people More innovation. Cape Cod you're guessing.

Building electrication power. C is a California. Electric vehicle charging that we're going to do. CCAs have also built their own small solar farms on places like landfills, airplane hangars, and the rooftops of businesses. Right. It's not like Every experiment's guaranteed will work out. open up the capability to experiment There's no one model of the energy system that's going to work everywhere.

But we do know that almost 150 years after Edison's first grid, the design he set in Electricity prices are rising, our reliance on fossil fuels keeps making climate change. And there are places where people lack access to reliable power. Local solutions won't fill every gap. But maybe they can fill some of them.

Ask MIT Climate is the climate change podcast of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Aaron Kroll is our executive producer and the writer for today's episode. David Leshansky is our sound editor and producer. Michelle Harris fact checks our episodes, and the music is by Blue Dot Sessions. And I'm your host and associate producer, Madison Goldberg.

Many thanks to Professor David Su for speaking with us, and to you, of course, for listening. You can find more episodes of the show at climate.mit.edu. We're also on TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube at AskMIT Climate. And if you have an energy question, whether it's about something miles away or right on your rooftop, we want to hear about it. Send us an email at askmitclimate at mit.edu.