The Nothing Ever Happens Market (EP. 418)

Today's episode is sponsored by Innovator ETFs, brought to you by CBO, the exchange for the world stage. Michael and I have had Innovator ETFs CEO...

Bruce Bond on the show a number of times to talk about their different strategies over the years and how they've changed and evolved. And they're definitely a leader in the defined outcome space. They are coming out with a new strategy July 1st.

with the first dual direction buffer ETFs. These ETFs allow investors to make money in both positive and negative markets. So they're offering a 10% inverse and a 15% inverse version. For example,

The 10%, if the market is down 10%, you would be up 10%, not just flat. So it's a different kind of hedge, right? It's one-to-one to the upside, up to the cap. So basically making money when others are losing it. So it's total inverse of the market.

It's a strategy that's racked up billions in the structured product wrapper, but will now be available in an ETF. Kind of crazy this hasn't been done before. To learn more, register for an exciting webinar. Link in the comments. Today's Animal Spirits...

is brought to you by YCharts. If you haven't checked out YCharts AI features lately, it's doing a lot more than just answering your questions. So they launched this new AI market commentary module. And it's like intraday, your favorite thing.

insights right to your dashboard. So if you want to know what's going on in the markets, what's moving the sectors, what are the macro headlines, this AI tool updates every 15 to 20 minutes. So basically it gets you up to speed, you know, if you're trying to figure out what's going on.

Advisor is also putting in the AI chat to work for major time-saving ways. I like it because you can just write a question in there. It'll spit stuff out for you. But it's also presentation-ready charts for client reports and these sort of things. It's really helpful. You can use Quick Extract. to turn static PDFs into impactful portfolios, generating market recaps and quarterly updates to keep your clients informed. All right, so this stuff helps you save time.

build it right into your workflow. This is how AI is going to work, I guess. Helping you create proposals faster, service insights quicker, so you spend less time researching, more time advertising. Click the link in the show notes, as always, to start using the AI chat today. And when you sign up for your first professional license with YCharts, get 20% off your subscription when you mention Animal Spirits, new customers only. Click the link in the show notes. Bye.

Welcome to Animal Spirits, a show about markets, life, and investing. Join Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson as they talk about what they're reading, writing, and watching. All opinions expressed by Michael and Ben are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for any investment decisions. Clients of Ritholtz Wealth Management may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this podcast.

Welcome to Animal Spirits with Michael and Ben. Michael, I have a take to get off my chest for you today. Someone asked me last week, what are you thinking about? What's going on? What's percolating in your brain about the markets? And my thought is this decade is about market amnesia. OK, I said before that the market can really only focus on one thing at a time.

I think if you just add up all the stuff that we've been through from the pandemic and all the stuff that went on with that, the meme stock craze, the 9% inflation, the rates going from 0% to 5%, remember the little Silicon Valley bank dust-up that lasted for like a weekend? I'm pretty sure I wrote a 1907 post about that. It lasted at least five days. You had the carry trade blow up was a thing. Liberation Day, obviously. Now the U.S. bombing Iran.

It just kind of feels like investors get jittery when this stuff happens. Maybe the market nosedives for a little bit, and then we kind of forget about it and move on. And I started talking about this last week, about how the whole LOL nothing matters kind of thing.

Mike Bird from The Economist wrote a piece on this, and he said, and this is the headline, and a bunch of people sent us this because we had discussed this last week. Investors ignore world-changing news. Rightly, the nothing-ever-happens market. I almost think that this sort of market amnesia is a good thing. If you're a successful long-term investor, you almost need this. And I know a lot of people think, well, well, eventually this ends badly.

But this was interesting from The Economist piece. So there's a paper going back to 1988, these researchers from MIT. Apparently Larry Summers, too. was part of this. They wanted to figure out what actually moves stock prices. And then they look at five decades worth of world-changing events. So they looked at Pearl Harbor and the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Chernobyl nuclear meltdown. And they figured that the volatility of returns...

on the day of these news events, these geopolitical big things that happen, was less than three times as large as on an ordinary day. Several of the biggest one-day falls identified by the authors occurred on days without an obvious news-related spark. And I think a lot of this stuff is probably counterintuitive. And I think maybe investors have finally learned their lesson on this stuff. And this is another.

feather in the cap of my idea that investors are becoming better behaved because it's like, listen, we've been fooled a million times on these headlines. This bad thing's going to happen. That bad thing's going to happen. I'm just going to ignore it all. And I think that actually this is another.

Step in the right direction for investors. Thoughts? It's a good take, and I agree. But I think we have to also discuss the why. Why are investors ignoring all of this? It's because it doesn't impact NVIDIA. Right. Like earnings from earnings for the stock market are not going to be impacted by a lot of these geopolitical flare ups. If we were in a different market environment with slow or no growth.

If energy was 15% of the index, if, if, if, if, it would be different. But right now, what's driving the train are the expectations of long-term earnings growth. Now, I don't think that investors like day to day are thinking about that, but ultimately that's where this is going. Yeah. And, and bird and his piece talked about how I can't remember the timeframe. It was 10 years or 15 years.

The earnings are up like 250%. Like that's, you're right. That is the thing that matters, right? A higher gas price is going to impact Apple and NVIDIA. So how about this? If we were in a stagflationary environment, each one of these cuts would take us down. Because it would just be like, oh my God, just another thing. Like how much can we possibly take? But we're in an opposite environment in which none of this seems to matter. It is interesting though that just...

Because I know stuff happened in the 1990s and 1980s, but it doesn't feel like it was quite as earth-shattering as what we've lived for this decade. Maybe that's recency bias on my part. But it is just weird to see all these things happening. And then the market's still not caring. Well, here's the other thing. Right now, the supply chain is built on AWS or whoever's cloud provider it is. Companies are so much less reliant on like...

quote, real world stuff, we have the ability to dial up and down productivity so much quicker than we did in the past. So yeah, it's a different world. Yeah. And I've written before on the whole stock market versus war thing. I'll put a link in the show notes. But just...

I look at all these events, World War I and World War II and the Cuban Missile Crisis and Vietnam and the Korean War. Are those comparisons relevant for today in any way, shape or form? They're relevant in the fact that it's the... the relationship between the market and those events is typically counterintuitive. Like, in the past, war has been bullish. Right. Which is, I think I always say the stock market is heartless, but if you look back at almost all those periods...

The stock market did great. You know the stat that World War I, the greatest year for the Dow ever, was 1915. Oh, 1915. Well, because the market was closed. That was after the market closed. But that was during World War I. That had happened. It was up like 80-some percent. Yeah.

Israel stock market hit an all-time high last week. Yeah. So again, if you think these headlines are like somehow bad for the market, then, and Josh has got this thing on like the Strait of Hormuz or whatever. I don't know how to say it because I've only read it before.

But when you start seeing people talk about that, that's a buy signal. I just think investors have become accustomed to these things. And sure, there's going to be a rug pull at some point, or one of these situations is really going to matter. I just don't know what it's going to be, and I don't think anyone else does ahead of time either.

So I think just ignoring this stuff and continuing to invest, I think the thing that's hard to recognize for a lot of investors is that the reason you make a change in your portfolio should usually be dictated by something that's happening in your life, not the markets.

And that's very hard to realize and recognize, right? It's like a change to your financial plan, or you're making more money, or you get an inheritance, or you're making less money. Something like that, that should have a greater impact on your portfolio changes than what's going on in the headlines.

Ben, it seemed like this was the week where a lot of the media started to publish on the biggest companies across America are cutting their workforces. It isn't just Amazon. There's a growing belief that having too many employees will slow a company down.

And that anyone still on the payroll could be working harder. That was the headline from the Wall Street Journal. So they show that U.S. public companies have reduced their white-collar workforce by 3.5% over the past three years. Over the past decade.

One in five companies in the S&P 500 have shrunk their employee count. And they show this great chart, number of white collar employees at US public companies, the change since the end of 2021. And they break it down by staff, executives, and managers. And everything is negative, but particularly executives and managers, which makes sense. These middle managers that are not revenue generating, whose job it is to oversee a lot of these people just.

World of pain. Can I make a claim on this? A take that there's a short-term take and a long-term take. Over the long term, I think you do have to be concerned about the labor market and what. AI could do. Over the short term, I think a lot of these stories are huge overreactions. Because this is from May 2022 to May 2025. 2022 was perhaps the hottest job market we will ever see in our lifetime.

And so places were overstaffed. Remember how many job openings there were compared with. So the Wall Street Journal also had this piece. And you can go against me on this take if you want. But they had this piece about. recent college grads, and they're saying young grads are facing an employment crisis. Crisis in the headline, okay? And they say,

The overall national unemployment rate is on 4%, but for college grads looking for work, it is much higher, 6.6% over the past 12 months ending in May. That does sound bad. They put a chart in here that shows ages 20 to 24, the unemployment rate for a bachelor's degree is rising.

But if you also look, they have one that shows high school degree, no college. And it's obviously much higher. So it's not like you're still getting a better deal there. But look at this unemployment rate, age 20 to 24. I pulled this one Y charts. Look at this going back historically. It's moving up slightly. Look at, it's probably at or below average going back to the 1950s. This has been way, way higher. It was higher in the 80s. It was higher in the 90s than it is today.

So I think we're throwing around this crisis term way too loosely just because we're comparing something to three years ago. I think people are overreacting. Yeah, I will take the other side of that. I don't agree. I think that… Look at this chart I just put in here. If you look back historically, I think we just talk about this stuff more than we did in the past. Is this chart going to go back down in the next year, two years, three years? No. Do you think it is? I don't.

Probably not, but look at how many times in the history that it's gone up. Still got a lot of room to run to get anywhere near what things were like in the 80s or 90s. Recency bias. Revenue per employee is back in favor as a metric. Investors and executives track carefully. Yeah, no, I will take the other side of this. I think that this is not going to reverse.

And I think that a lot of people are in for Walter Payne. Now, I don't know that it's going to necessarily tip the economy into a recession or anything like that. I don't know. But I think that the white-collar manager... That was very comfortable. Should be very uncomfortable. My sense is, I think these things take time to play out. Maybe you're, but so another one from Wall Street Journal was Americans are side hustling like we're in a recession. So they said the two,

trend these days is the necessity not pursuing a passion. I'll take the other side of this headline. I think that the idea of a side hustle, and let's be honest, like, I know I said, let's be honest. What percentage of side hustles are done over the internet?

Right. I think it's just easier to do a side hustle these days. How could you have done a side hustle in the 90s? Like, what were you going to do? Like, mow lawns on the side? And I put multiple job holders as a percentage of employed in here. And again, this is something that was much higher in the 90s, and it's still like 5% or 6% of total employees. So here's one that kind of is to your point. This is from Andy Jassy, the CEO of Amazon. He wrote a piece about...

Thoughts on generative AI. There was a lot of throat clearing in there. It was basically like a page and a half of enhancements of generative AI and how they're using them all over. And then it's like, yeah, we're going to need less people. Yeah, he said. Yeah, he talked a lot about what it's going to do, but he said as they roll out more generative AI and agents, it's going to change the way the work is done.

We expect this will reduce our total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company. And I asked you, I think on Slack, how do we separate the actual AI productivity gains from the fact that tech companies probably overhired? and need to cut workforce. It's a balancing act to think through what the actual reason is, right? Well, it's also the, I think it's also getting ahead of we're spending a lot of money.

Let's try and cut some employees. It's kind of like Doge, though. It's like a drop in the bucket. How many people are you really going to let go to offset the spending? So I also think that just the labor market dynamics in the years ahead, if you combine AI with… 10,000 baby boomers retiring every single day, I think we're going to get some weirdness in the labor market data. I think it's going to be very bizarre for the next 10, 15, 20 years. Yeah. All right. This is surprising to me.

Bob Elliott tweeted, it seems the hard and soft data have converged toward each other. And it happened with soft data, a lot of the survey stuff catching up. I would have considered this to be... Let's say like plus 280 if I was a betting man four months ago. So sentiment turned around. It looks like the hard data did fall. I don't know what this is. I don't know what this is measuring here, but you're right. The sentiment.

I mean, the sentiment there to me looks like the stock market. I would have said like the odds of them converging because hard data is falling fast. And now to your point, hard data did fall out. I would have said minus 115. So yeah, surprising. So V-shape rallies are still here in everything. Everything's a V. All right, this is something. The Financial Times put out a report that said...

X, as in Twitter, chief executive. You're a narc if you call it X. Got to call it Twitter. Sorry. I'm just reading. I know. The worst is when people say Twitter. I mean, X, like it's still Twitter. Sorry. Linda Yaccarino has said that users will soon be able to make investments or trades on the social media platform, as she outlined a push into financial services and owner Elon Musk.

quest to build an everything app no one's doing this you already can do it on robin hood or where like no one this isn't gonna work yeah i would i would agree with that this is gonna be a flop yeah no one's gonna do that there's i no way sorry Who's ever been able to make the Everything app? It's not a thing. Ryan on The Office. Woof-woof, or whatever it was called, right? What do you mean, Ryan? I don't know what you're talking about.

Okay. He had this, Ryan on The Office had this idea where you put one social media post out and it goes immediately to Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and then it would send a fax and it would do everything for you. All right, you've still got to catch up on the office, I guess. Okay, Torsten Slott chart of the week. I don't know when this is through, but he's saying a record high foreign ownership of the U.S. stock market. So I don't know if this is...

through April yet or not. But it is kind of crazy that we've gone from essentially five or 6% foreign ownership in the stock market in the mid 90s to nearly 20% now and how important globalization is to our Financial markets. This is like the rest of the world catching up with us too and realizing I've seen all this stuff. I think Vanguard had a good study a number of years ago showing that home country bias was even worse in foreign countries. Probably not anymore.

Which doesn't make much sense because those countries' stock markets are so concentrated and they're such a small piece of the global pie. Foreigners should have a much higher ownership share of U.S. equity. Kind of like how we talked last week.

People have a higher allocation of stocks than cash and fixed income they did in the past. This is the kind of thing that is a trend that shouldn't really reverse and probably should continue to go higher. How high can it go, though? If we're 65% or 70% of the global stock market, it should be higher.

Why? Foreign owners own almost 20% of the market. How high should it go? That's a lot, no? Yeah, I don't know. I'm just saying if we're two-thirds of the market, there should be a really high ownership of U.S. stocks by foreigners. Yeah. pension funds and sovereign wealth funds and individuals and family offices? Think about it. All right. We spent a lot of time talking about concentration in the S&P 500. Schroeder's...

has a chart that shows market concentration is a global phenomenon. This is what I was just talking about. Top 10 stocks in UK are 50%. Wow. So the top five here are 26%. The top five there are 35%, 25% in Japan, 23% in EM, and 70% in the ACQUI. So it's not just us.

I've looked at this before. The rest of the world is way worse because their stock markets are smaller. So I think if you look at like Korea, Samsung makes up like 25% of their index or something like that. I think we spoke like years and years ago about Greece. I think it's like hilariously skewed. Yes, that's the thing. In other countries, it's even worse. That's why. So, yeah, Samsung is 20%. So there's two names that make up 30% of the South Korean stock market ETF.

And so, yeah, the concentration over there is way, way worse. All right, here's another good one from Bank of America Global Research. Once a diverse index, the S&P 500 is now 50% growth. So they broke it down by pure value, pure growth, and blend. And pure value has gone from 25% in 2005 down to 15% in 2015, down to 9% in 2025.

while pure growth went from 35% up to 50%. Remember when Apple was a value stock for like a year? Yeah, it really was. Traded for like 12 times. Is that when Buffett was buying, basically? That's when people were talking about back out the cash. And I think a lot of nitwits, myself included, were like, LOL, back out the cash. Well, back out the cash. Great investment. Yeah, it sort of worked. I mean, this is, I guess, another one that makes a lot of sense. Because that's also…

2005 period, value had had a really good run for about five years following the dot-com bubble. Ben, let's talk about cars. Also from the Journal. Light vehicle sales have fallen by about 1.7 million a year since 2016. This was a really good piece, by the way. It was. It really was. I agree. Reflecting the number of younger consumers declining the pleasures of ownership, millions more remain trapped in toxic relationships with abusive elders.

They're talking about cars. The average age of passenger cars on the road is currently 14 and a half years. A friend of mine. It's kind of crazy. Has a Cherokee EV. and the thing just died. It doesn't sound like your Jeep EDs are doing very well because you say yours isn't great either. No, it just died. It won't turn on. It's like a year old. The total cost to own and operate an automobile.

averaged a frightening $12,296 in 2024. Roughly 30% higher than a decade ago. So that's insurance, gas, maintenance, all the stuff that goes with owning a car, right? New cars are 50 grand almost. In 2024, the AAA calculated the average new vehicle losses. I'm sorry. The average new vehicle loses an eye-watering $4,680 in value every year. Big time depreciation. Dude, it's wild. Cars suck.

That's nuts. Every year for the first five years. So they're saying because some people are now priced out of new cars, which is almost 50 grand, demand for used cars is up. That means the average used car is now over 25 grand, which is... Kind of insane. Obviously, these cars are lasting longer. I wonder if some people are going to be like, you know what? I'm just going to start taking Ubers everywhere I go. There's no way I'm spending $13,000 on Ubers.

If you calculated it out. So especially for two-car households? You know, I see a lot more of the electric bikes on the road. If you live in a nice climate, that would be appealing to me. Cars have become a huge pain in the ass. They're so expensive. They're so reliant on computers. They spoke about how much plastic is in cars and how they're basically built to die, sort of like the iPhone. The other thing that the…

this touched on was the cost of insurance and the cost of maintenance has risen a lot. Because of all the sensors and such that we have in there, that it's anytime you get it fixed, it's not cheap either. And that's one of the reasons that the prices keep going up, because the...

cameras and the sensors and all the stuff they're putting in there is more expensive as well. Unfortunately, I think a lot of people assume that having like a two-car household now is the thing, right? But you're right. It's hard to... Get off of that and maybe some people will these days, but yeah this some of the stats in here were pretty pretty crazy Okay, so Mark Zuckerberg is desperate. I think this is kind of his whole thing and

I guess it really kind of goes back to the social network movie about him. He just seems like a guy who's constantly searching for something. I don't know if it's approval, but he kind of changes up his style and his... He just seems like a nerd who is constantly trying to be in the in crowd, right? And I think that that's actually been a good thing for him in his career. I think Mark Zuckerberg is his image today versus...

I mean, five years ago, forget about it. Or 10 years ago, even, too, during the election was not great. I think his approval rating is maybe at an all-time high. Just because he grew his hair out curly. Yeah. Right? Got a tan. and started doing like Muay Thai or something. So Sam Altman talked on a podcast recently and he said, Meta started making giant offers to a lot of people on our team, you know, like $100 million signing bonuses.

more than that in compensation per year. And I think Altman was bragging like, hey, a lot of our people are turning them down. So you mentioned Scale AI a few weeks ago, I think, with Mary Meeker's presentation. And I think right two days later. Yeah.

Facebook made a $14.3 billion investment in them. They wanted the founder to help now. And they also made a big investment, Daniel Gross and Nat Friedman, who are on this trajectory podcast, everyone's talking AI. I don't know if you've heard any of those interviews. they brought them in to like run their AI efforts. And so it's interesting to me because this all to me sounds like they are behind. But I also wouldn't because of, again, his like...

desperation. And I'm not saying this almost in a bad way. I'm saying like, I think it's worked for him, but he's, he seems so desperate and you almost think like, God, they must be really far behind, but I wouldn't put it past him to make all these investments and then come out ahead still and be okay. You said you don't mean desperate in a bad way. I think he's paranoid in a good way. Yeah. And that was like the Grove book, right? The intel guy? Yeah. Only the paranoid survive? It seems, but...

Obviously, whatever they've done, he's looking at it and going, oh my gosh, we're behind someone or something. I just do wonder, with all the money being thrown around, what's the breakdown between people who... are just true ai believers and i'm this is going to be our next god or something or this is gonna you know the sum total of human knowledge and it's smarter than humans versus people who are just like all right this is signing bonuses i'm gonna get my five-year max to play for the

Grizzlies or whoever. I would love to know the breakdown. Who cares? I don't know. I'd like to have some morality, I guess, in AI because it's going to be this life-changing technology. I just want someone behind the wheel who's going to be like, look out for humanity and all this. I don't know.

What was the name of the AI in Mission Impossible? See, I didn't watch the new one yet. What? I'll just wait until it comes out on video. I don't care. All right. I mean, you're Mr. TC. Are you not? Yeah. I don't know. I'll get to it. Okay. But yeah, that's a big thing, though. AI as the villain. That's going to be because we couldn't make the Chinese the villains in movies anymore because you have to sell movies over there. And so I think...

The Russia thing has kind of been played out. You can't really do Nazis anymore because it's too far away from World War II. So AI is just going to be the villain in like every movie going forward. Yeah, I've probably seen a dozen in the last 12 months. Right? It's not that great of a story though anymore.

Right? Can we just have an off switch for AI if it gets too powerful? Just turn it off. What's this piece about radiologists? Okay, this is interesting. This is why I think the labor market stuff is going to be… Hard to predict. So this is a story in the New York Times, and they say nine years ago, one of the world's leading AI scientists singled out an endangered occupational species. He said at the time, Jeffrey Hinton.

People should stop training radiologists now. It's just completely obvious that within five years, AI would outperform humans in that field. And they say, today radiologists are still in high demand. And it's true, they said at Mayo, they're using AI.

to help identify any medical abnormalities and predict disease. And it can also serve as a second set of eyes. Hey, I'm looking at this. What am I missing? Or what, you know, check me. But they say that there are more radiologists than ever. And it actually...

AI is helping them, and because of the demand for healthcare, they're needing more radiologists. So it's not putting them out of business. It's just becoming helpful to them in their job. And somehow it's increasing the demand for radiologists. So there's three things that are going to happen, I think, and probably a lot more than I'm not thinking of. Industries are going to get displaced entirely. Customer service.

The thing that you just mentioned, no, no, no, actually radiologists are going to be in higher demand and AI is going to help it be more productive. And then the third and hopefully biggest category of the three are new jobs that we cannot possibly predict today because we don't know what.

technology is going to exist. And that would be the hope, that there's going to be new demand for new jobs that we just don't know about yet. And unfortunately, most people will pay attention to the first one and get really mad about it. So for example, a little teaser on talking wealth over at the unlock, I'm speaking on Wednesday at 11 to Dave nodding and.

You and I could talk about this next week to rehash. I want to get your thoughts. Yes, I have thoughts. My kids will not use a financial advisor. A human being, a human being will not financially advise my children. More to come.

You know, you're selling your kids short there. You're saying you're not going to have any money. Is that the problem? Yeah, okay. You laid this out to me, and I definitely have to. But I agree with you. Those three things, and the hard part is going to be the transition phase.

I just, it's really going to be interesting how the next 10 years plays out because there's going to be a lot of people who are really, really mad. I mean, so wait, so we're, so we're, we had the tariff thing and we argued about like, we need to make our iPhones in here again, right?

There's going to be situations where AI is all customer service and people are going to go, we need to have real people again for customer service. Nah. I'm going to be the guy saying, I remember when there was not real people. There was real shitty computers that always.

Broke. Or never works. You think AI is also going to go, hang on just a sec, my computer's running a little slow today. That's every customer service person in history. So they can look up your whatever. But there are going to be people. The other day I posted, I did a blog post and I.

I like to include a picture or something there for social media, right? And I just did, I think I did a Keeping Up with the Joneses one. I used, pulled something from Daniel Crosby's book since we talked to him and I used some studies. And I did a People Standing in Front of Their Toys and Houses That Are Unhappy.

Right. Joneses aren't as happy as you think they are. And some dude hit me on social media with, oh, cute. You're using AI to create pictures, like making fun of it. Like there's going to be people who are like anti-AI and like. Totally like, I'm not going to use this technology. There are going to be people who are too cool for AI. I mean, that was going to be a thing. That was you with Facebook and coffee. But I'd never used it. Right. Either of them. Okay. Still never had a Facebook account.

This is Meta. I just asked ChachiBT, how many people in the United States work in call centers doing customer service roles? How many people do you think, Ben? A million? 2.8 to 3.4 million. According to the chat GPT. Do you remember the presentation? This is a long time ago. That's a lot of people. There's a lot of people. We had a presentation.

or a conference in New York a number of years ago, back before we knew how to do actually good conferences. But we had Scott Galloway there, and he did one of those presentations where he went through a million slides, and...

Remember the Amazon store where it was going to be like, you walk into Amazon store, you put the stuff in your cart and you walk out and it charges you. I don't know if that still exists or if it just seems like it never. They're in the airport. But Galloway was saying, listen, there's two to three million people who.

work at cash registers, and those people are going to be out of business. How come stuff like that never happened? I think it did happen to a certain extent with the self-checkout lanes. There's way fewer cashiers at the grocery stores than there used to be. there are still people who do not know how to use self-checkout lanes. And I don't get it how at this point, like there are certain people I feel like you should have to pass a test.

Like, there should be a timer, a shot clock for self-checkout lanes and the drive-thru. If you take too long at the self-checkout lane or the drive-thru, sorry. You either go inside or you go to a person to pay. I agree. The cashier should say, nope. Yeah, you can't hold up society. Sorry.

There's going to have someone come to sweep all your stuff and move you over here. You lost your privilege for this as a human being. All right. I don't have a ton to say on this topic other than I just don't like this. Brian Armstrong at Coinbase said, the world needs crypto now more than ever. Now, as a fellow bald, I appreciate his baldness. And I guess it's like, you know, a barber's going to tell you you need a haircut. So what I expect him to say, but.

Right. Goes on to say, debt is growing exponentially. Inflation is crippling entire nations. Economic freedom is declining. It's time to increase economic freedom globally with crypto. Actually, you know what? Maybe. Okay, maybe I will give a pass here or try and interpret what he's saying. Because he didn't say Bitcoin. If he said Bitcoin, I would have just said hard no. But stablecoins, I think, stablecoins actually do increase economic freedom, I think, or can. Not an expert, but...

If I am somebody who lives in a country with not this more stable currency, the idea of digital dollars sounds pretty good. I feel like people don't even make that anymore. Oh, we're going to stable coins in a minute. How many CEO pictures do you think are them not looking at the camera? Yeah, look over here. So someone also sent us the Coinbase.

I feel like they should almost be spiking the ball instead of trying to make weird arguments. But there was a commercial in the NBA finals. Someone sent this to me. And it was saying how like five years ago, it cost X number of Bitcoins to buy a house. It was like, you know, 10 Bitcoins to buy a house. Who uses Bitcoin to buy a house? Now it costs two Bitcoins to buy a house. And it was kind of saying, it was just a weird way of... Set number go up. Yeah. Okay, so back to stablecoins.

So the Genius Act. I love what they're doing now. Maybe this is another AI thing. By the way, I saw somebody tweet. Was it? Who was it? About it's called genius because Trump refers to himself as a stable genius. Ah, okay. Is that why? All right. Pretty good. So all the articles these days now have the key points, and I think that's just taken from AI. So this Genius Act, it...

it regulates stablecoins. And it also mandates you have to have $1 of reserves for every $1 of stablecoins, right? So this is like, if you're going to be using, this stuff has to be backed. And ironically enough, this stuff is just going to increase the...

Demand for dollars, obviously. Right? This is bullish for U.S. dollars, correct? I would think so. And T-bills, probably, because isn't most, or treasuries, isn't most of this money just going to be invested in T-bills and treasuries? I don't think anybody wants a stable coin that's...

backed by the lira. Right. But so this is going to just people always say, like, who's going to buy our debt? I guess it's stablecoin issuers. But so Sam Lee, who's a great follow and probably one of the most successful crypto people that.

no one ever talks about because he used to work at Morningstar. He runs his own financial advisor firm. He tweets about crypto once in a while, but he is probably one of the best crypto people I know who's not completely into crypto. He's like more of the human side of it. All right, what'd he say? So he just talked about how this is like a huge, huge deal potentially. So he's saying, listen, it's profitable. So someone like Tether earns $6 billion a year in risk-free.

because their stuff is backed and they just put it into T-bills, right? Also, he said, big corporations now have permission to go after the market and grow. They can more easily compete with Visa and MasterCard and American Express.

Retailers in particular have a strong incentive to cut credit card processing fees. Most importantly, that grants stablecoins legitimacy, which will spur adoption by individuals. So one of the stories I saw said, like, why wouldn't Amazon and Walmart just create their own stablecoin and totally do away with the 2% to 3%?

processing fees. He's saying, let's see, in the long run with more legitimate non-speculative economic activity occurring on stable coins or cryptocurrency networks that power them.

will become increasingly attractive places for commerce. We could see huge growth in decentralized financial protocols. So this is obviously like recreating the rails of the financial system. So he's kind of saying like, listen, a lot of this stuff is not imminent. It's going to take time to build out. But the fact that...

this stuff is a possibility now is one of the reasons that a company like Circle is going bonkers, right? And trying to bet on who the winner is going to be, like, it's kind of like if you can build, you know, rebuild the rails of the financial system. and potentially, you know, challenge credit card companies, like the possibility for this being a huge, huge companies is really there. Weisenthal tweeted, here's Circle on every day since its IPO, incredible run. So this is...

Literally daily returns. Up 168. That's IPO day. Up 29, up seven, down eight, up 10, down nine, up 25, up 13, down one, up 34, up 21. LOL. Those look like annual returns for the S&P. Let me tell you a quick story. It's long. I'll try and make it quick. So my house that I rented out is closing hopefully soon.

I have paid either three or four months of my mortgage without a tenant, which was not that much fun. She left, not abruptly, but I was like, all right, she's been there five years. And she's like, no, actually I'm leaving. In 30 days, I was like, oh, well, could use a heads up. Anyhow, so just in terms of like eating away at whatever return I made, which, you know, I got very lucky, but still four months of mortgage payments and a decent amount of repairs, unfortunately, to pass.

you know, inspections and all that sort of stuff. So I had a plumber come in and there's a couple of issues I not imported, but the bill was $2,800. And I said, huh, can I see the breakdown? There was four different things. And one of them was $1,000 for a sink, $200 for a faucet and whatever, the rest of the labor. I said, that sounds really high.

I'm going to phone a friend. And the rest of the things I spoke to my broker, he said, yeah, everything else is reasonable, but that's crazy talk. So I said, all right, instead of $2,800, what if I'll give you guys cash? Can I give you $2,400? He said, uh, okay, fine. We'll do that. I went to the bank and I, on the way to the bank, I called my friend and I said, Hey, can you install a sink, a faucet? He said, yeah, great. All right.

So I went to the bank and I got $2,000. Now I owed them $2,400. I'm sorry. I owe them $2,500. I owe them $2,500. I asked 24 this. Okay, fine. The bank was closed. It was Juneteenth. And... The maximum amount of cash that you could withdraw is $2,000 from Chase. Did you know that? Did not know that. From your debit card. Now, the bank was closed. There was no tellers. I couldn't go to the window. So I called them up. I said, hey, could you please increase my limit?

She said, no, you're maxed out. I said, really? The most cash that I can access on a day is $2,000. And she said, yes. But I said, but I need more cash. She said, well, I'm sorry. You can go back tomorrow. Like there's no, I can't override you at the max. So obviously I'm thinking about stable coins and all this. I'm like, this is crazy town. So I, uh, and then they, they pissed me off. I called them back and I said, listen, I'm not going to do the faucet.

You know, so whatever that is, a thousand bucks, just knock that off the price and I'll just, I'll give you cash. He called me back and said, actually, you don't, you no longer get the cash discount. Now it's whatever, $2,000. And I'm like, come on, really? Like.

So now why even pay my friend 500 bucks? I might as well just have you just do the whole thing. So he's like, anyway, we're going back and forth. And he said, all right, fine. You can put $2,000 cash, 500 bucks on the credit card, no additional fees. I said, all right, fine, just do it.

Oh, you wanted to payment Bitcoin? I went back to the house, took $2,000 out. And I said, hey, is it cool if I just leave the money in the drawer? I don't want to sit there and watch you do this. He said, yeah, no problem. Nice kid. He called me later that night and said, There was only $1,800 in the drawer. And I said, no, there wasn't. I took out $2,000, put in an envelope, took the money out of the envelope and put it in the drawer.

I said, I will go to the house over the weekend and hopefully it's there. And he said, okay. What would you have done in that situation if the money wasn't there? Nowhere to verify. You know? Yeah, it's my word against this. Yeah. Anyhow, the $200 was in the drawer, which made me very happy. I was like, I don't want to call the credit card company and tell them to reject it and then get this kid in trouble.

So he just didn't see it? Yeah. So I'm like, dude. Oh, okay. So he just, because it was, you know, it was a small stack of bills. So I guess he just picked it up and there was just two that he didn't pick up, which is just odd. But anyhow. So the whole point of the story is...

buying an investment property, not that much fun, right? Paying several months of a mortgage, not that much fun. Paying to repair a window, to paint, to this, to that. Going to the town to make sure, not that much fun. The return on hassle, as Nick likes to say.

Not great. Not doing this again. Even though it was a very good financial outcome. Still, pain in the ass. And also, $2,000 at the bank? Come on. Yeah. You don't deal with this with index funds, right? No. Come on, Chase. Did you see… Wait, wait. So, but what is this? So, is your crypto thing…

Do you think crypto makes this sort of transaction either? Because I think, I heard this story once, and I'm outing one of my uncles here, but one of my favorite stories from my uncles was, I think this is in the 70s, he's riding a 10-speed bike home from a party. He hits a crack or something, and this is like downtown, I can't remember, Detroit or Grand Rapids or something, and he falls over in front of a cop, and a joint rolls out of his pocket.

And they brought him into the, and this is on a Saturday. They brought him into jail to like book him for a night of jail. He had weed on him. And my mom and her sister were going to go pick him up at the jail. And they didn't have any money. No banks were open. They couldn't.

afford his bail. They had to wait till Monday to go to the bank to get some cash out to go pay 50 bucks or whatever it was at the time to get him out of jail. So we had to spend the weekend in jail. This is pre-ATM. There was no ATMs back then. So my point is it could have been worse. You could add nothing. Now, I guess a listener or you or even me could say, well, why didn't you just Venmo them? Like, what's wrong with Venmo? Right? I don't know. But the point is, banks.

as they currently exist or just a bit, it's a time of a different era. Yeah, maybe on purpose. All right. You know the I'm not leaving meme? I guess it's Leo from Wolf of Wall Street. Sure. Overrated movie. I think so too. A good movie. A good movie. A good movie. Decent movie. I watched it once. Overrated. That's boomers with their housing. Redfin says one in three baby boomers say they will never sell their house.

And another 30% say that they'll sell at some point, but not within the next decade. Boomers aren't leaving it. I kind of tend to believe them because they've lived in their house for a very long time. I think the number is, they said two-thirds of boomers have lived in their home for 16-plus years. And it also shows that younger people say that they are more likely to move.

If they can, I'd still do think that there's a cohort of millennials who are going to be in your house for a long time. I am personally with a 3% mortgage. I mean, my oldest daughter's 11, youngest are eight, like at least until the kids are done with high school or college, probably. We're in this house. I really want to be underwater, given that I'm a nautical man. But I'm not leaving. Right? It would be hard. I mean, you know, things do happen.

But I can't see. And plus, listen, we're finally taking some of that home equity line of credit. I'll talk about this more in the weeks ahead, I guess. And we're doing some renovation. Are you doubling the size of your mudroom? I wish. Mudroom's not being touched. But we're doing, like, new flooring, and, oh, well, if we're doing a new flooring, we've got to do a new paint job. Hey, if we're doing a new paint job, we have to change the banisters. And so I'm, like...

One decision leads to three or four in housing. And this is another point of the return on housing. But sometimes you make these decisions about how you want your house done. It's like almost an experiential thing.

Are we going to get a one-to-one return on what we're doing? Absolutely not. And it's very expensive. Way more expensive than I thought. We're putting like hardwood floors to our whole house. It's not going to be cheap. But we're going to live there for a long time, so I don't mind making this investment.

Yeah, if you amortize that cost, you know, it's nothing. All right. Wait, wait, one more thing about the negotiating though. Like you said, paying in cash. Like I think that's a really, that's a thing you should do for any type of renovation. Okay, if I pay cash, will you make it cheaper? And I was going to do that tactic?

But they offered me 0% financing for a year. Done. Don't ask me again. Of course I'm going to do that. I'm going to let them carry the cost for a year for a very high cost thing? Sure. Put it on my tab. No, not buy now, pay later. I'd be fine with that, though, if it was. Let's run through some stuff in private markets. We're getting long, so we can do this quick. There was an article over the weekend, or last week.

Fidelity rolls out custom models with Alts via investment partnership. We are in the early innings of this mega trend. It feels like it's, I think financial advisors feel like it's a bubble. Because there is just so much activity from these alternative asset managers just hounding us relentlessly. So from that respect, you could say there is way too much supply.

which I'm calling the relentless ask, there's way too much supply of these investments and maybe not enough demand to soak it up. Now that may be true, but they're coming. And if you want to learn more, another plug for Talking Wealth. on the unlock for advisors. I spoke with Phil Huber and it was great because there's, there's just, there's a lot of negative press. Some of it very fair. Some of it kind of nonsensical that we got into, but.

There was a— And Phil comes from both sides of the aisle, so he can speak. He was an RA. But the thing is, this thing getting, like, the model portfolios and the target date funds, like, that is the entrance. That's the foot in the door. When you have it—when it's in the models and—

A lot of people use those and a lot of advisors rely on those. Like that's when it's a really big push. So there is a, JP Morgan has this guide to alternatives. Like they've got to the markets, got to retirement, got to alternatives. I want to run through some quick charts. So they show public and private manager dispersion. And when you look at global large cap equities, the dispersion over a 10-year period, it's nothing.

On the high end, it's 8.9%. On the low end, it's 7.2%. And this is like top and bottom quartile? I don't know what it says exactly. But like, the point is, if you throw a dart at large cap... managers, even if you hit the worst of the worst, whatever. Okay. So the market did nine, you did seven, two. You know what I mean? Like if you selected the worst, if you're throwing darts at private equity.

you could be in for a wall to pain. And let's be honest, most people are throwing darts. This is a great chart. David Twenson talked about this a lot. Like if you're not in the top quartile, top decile for these private assets, it's not worth it. So. All right, so here's what it is. It's 75th percentile, and then on the bottom is 25th percentile. Oh, yeah, you're right. So it's top and bottom quartiles. So 21% on the high end for private equity.

1.5% of the low end and no liquidity. How do you like that? That's fine. And the bottom quartile for venture and real estate are negative returns. Horrible. So. Yeah, you better be careful and you better be right. But this is why private credit is the thing. Private credit of all the privates has the lowest dispersion. So this is why.

I think most advisors will be most comfortable using private credit. And it's also the easiest thing to sell. I agree with you. Yield. We're going to give you 10% yield. What else do you need to know? Nothing. Sign on the dotted line. Investor asset allocation. So institutional investors. 22% to alternatives, 78% to traditional assets, very high net worth in family offices of 30 million plus, have 19% in alts.

High net worth investors, 5 million to 30 million, 2%. So they are pushing and I don't know how much winning they're going to do, but they're going to win in my estimation. Right. You want to bet against those? That chart you had that showed BlackRock versus Blackstone and the assets versus the market cap. It's unbelievable. So BlackRock has 10 times the amount of assets as Blackstone, yet Blackstone's market cap is 10% to 15% larger.

Right. It would be like Vanguard versus any active manager. Like Vanguard's market cap, if they're a publicly traded company, would be much smaller than a lot of the active, even though they have trillions of dollars. That's exactly right. I spoke with Phil about the story about Yale.

Uh, well, listen, if the pioneer dumping their, their private investments and like, they're just, they're not dumping their private investments. Um, there are, there are other parts of the story, but the chart that I want to point to is secondary market volume. has gone from $25 billion in 2012 up to $162 billion in 2024. So a lot of this is rebalancing too?

There's just so much more liquidity. Yeah, it's easier to trade now. But again, I think a lot of that is rebalancing. Perhaps, yeah. There was a story again about, Zweig wrote about this, about marking up. marketing up to NAV when you buy something in the secondary market. And Phil and I spoke about this. If you're buying something for 40 cents, you're marketing up to a dollar and you're taking carry, that's horseshit. But a lot of these buyouts in the secondary market are at a...

5% to 6% discount to NAV. So, okay, that's the price. That's the cost of liquidity. If somebody wants to dump a billion-dollar stake in private markets and the buyer pays 95 cents, I have no problem with them marking that up to NAV. Right. Yeah. Lastly, private company buyout multiples versus the S&P. This is wild, Ben. So for large cap and middle market, large cap is considered a billion dollars plus middle market is a hundred million to a billion.

They're looking at median enterprise value to EBITDA, the trail in 12-month multiples. There's no discount. There's no discount. And part of the whole appeal of locking up your money was that if you are going to give up liquidity. the higher returns better come from a lower entry point in terms of valuation. That disappeared. I can't remember what the podcast was, but there was an interview with Mitt Romney a number of years ago.

And he was talking about how Bain Kappa, when they bought companies, and he started out in like the 80s and 90s, and they were buying these companies like two to four times. Yeah, shooting fish in a barrel. And yeah, he's like, of course our returns were great. the valuations were ridiculously low on these companies. That's not the case anymore. So the small caps are under $100 million. Yes, there still is a substantial discount there. It's 8.8 times as there should be, right?

So anyway, JP Morgan, Guide to Alternatives, very good resource, The Unlocked, Talking Wealth with Phil Huber. All right, Ben, let's move on to the Sapphire Reserve. You threw it out there at the end of the show last week. Yeah, I didn't have the time to go through it. Are you bailing?

So, well, I may have changed my mind. I maybe overreacted last week. Credit to me for raising my hand and saying it. So, you said, well, they're raising the fee to, what, $7.95 a year, which just sounds insanely high. So this is from the points guy. They broke it down what you get. So you get a $500 annual statement for their curated luxury hotel brands. You have to...

Do it through them, which I hate using the portals on the credit cards to book travel. I don't like it. This sucks. Split into $250 biannual credits, that's annoying. Yeah, so that means you have to book twice. So that one you're probably not going to use. So you get a $300 annual statement credit. Here's for you for StubHub.

Okay, again, split it between two six-month periods. $300 in DoorDash promotions. So that's not bad. Oh, wow. $300 in dining credit. But wait, but wait, but wait, but wait, Ben. Yes, there's all of these things, but you really have to be on top of it. So for example, for DoorDash, oh, 300 bucks. So you do the math. You're like, oh, they're paying you. No, they're not. For DoorDash, it's a $5 restaurant promo.

And two $10 promos on Everyday Essentials each month. All right. And you have to activate it. You get a statement credit for Apple TV or music. So I would use that. That's fine. $120 for Peloton membership, $10 a month. I'll use that. The DoorDash DashPass membership, which takes away some of the fees. Dude, this is a job in and of itself. But yeah, it's a lot. So you're right. You have to be on it. And that's why they know.

Plus, they have the $300 travel credit applied to all purchases made in travel category. So you get that. So listen, this is decent value. So it ends up working out for me, but they know people aren't going to use all these values. Exactly. That's why. But you're not canceling. You're not leaving. I'm not leaving. I'm still here. All right. I also grabbed this chart from the JP Morgan's Guide to Alternatives. I just wanted to flag this one thing. They show retail real estate per capita.

Look at us. We are so far number one. We've got 23 and a half square feet per person. Canada's number two at 16.8. Then Australia at 11.1. UK is 4.6. Japan is 4.4. China's 2.8. So think about it. When you drive through America and you pass a town on a highway, every town in America you see, look it, there's a Best Buy.

There's a TJ Maxx. There's all these, you know, there's all these retail Target, whatever. You don't get that when you drive in other countries, right? You don't see all this big box retail. So you're right. That's what we have. And obviously, we love to spend money.

Ben, I put the travel, the car stuff in the travel section, so I just wanted to pull out two quotes. We spoke about this earlier, how cars suck. Quote, this is David Francis Kelly. Credit to David Francis, uh, Kylie, I'm sorry. Great quote here.

The gizmo that failed in my Ford Escape that pivots to direct either hot or cold air in the HVAC is plastic. The cost to replace was over $2,000 because the geniuses at Ford buried it with no access unless the whole dash was pulled out. By the way, we forgot to mention this, I think. Maybe I did, but I don't think we did.

A couple of months ago, somebody emailed us. I was like, hey, you guys are always talking about people like David Francis Kiley, like where do journalists get these people? There is a website that matches journalists to everyday people. Did you know that? No. Yeah. I forget what the site is, but there's a...

There's a repository of people waiting to talk to journalists. Probably people who leave Yelp reviews. Here's another one. My 2013 BMW X5 rear-ended a small car and the damaged Mike Harlick minor, said Tom Walken, a psychologist from Raleigh, North Carolina.

But the electronics in the front bumper area pushed the repair cost to more than 75% of the car's value. So North Carolina law required that it be totaled. Yeah, this sucks. Cars suck. And his insurance probably went up a lot too. All right, Ben. continuing another mega trend of remaking movies from our era. A new Harold and Kumar movie is officially in the works. I liked Harold and Kumar when I was younger. I'm probably not going to see this.

These movies didn't do it for me. I probably watched the first- Because you weren't a stoner. Yeah. Yeah, but I loved Half-Baked, though. Okay. Well, who didn't? So this one, it just didn't do it for me. You know what I saw last night? So- During the finals, when Halliburton's Achilles exploded, which was disgusting, and that sucked. Feel bad for him and Pacers fans.

During halftime, I said, you know what? I'm going to the movies. I will watch the rest of the game on my phone if I need to, but I'm not anticipating a nail-biter. That was a pretty good choice. So I went to see, because I'm not going to be able to see it for a while. I've got stuff coming up.

I want to see 28 Years Later. F***ing awesome movie. See, I kind of want to watch the first two before I watch that one again because it's been a while. So 28 Days Later, I rewatched. That movie was like a phenomenon when it came out. It was. I never saw it 28 weeks later and I was told to skip it, so I did. Oh, I like that one. Okay. 28 years later was a certified banger. It was awesome. Okay. Awesome. But anyhow.

See, that's one of the ones where you and I are actually on the same wavelength here for kind of a horror-ish movie. I'm surprised that you like that sort of stuff. I like it. Anyway. Were the guys walking through the hospital in the first one and being like, what? And it's the guy, it's... Killian Murphy. Oppenheimer, yeah. There was a trailer for, I thought it was a full reboot. It's not a reboot. I know what you did last summer because Jennifer Love Hewitt and Freddie Prinze are in it.

I'm in for that. So one of the two of them is going to be the killer. Spoiler alert. That was like a C-level teen horror movie, in my opinion, but I'm going to see that. Definitely saw it in the theater. But let's be honest. One of those two is the killer now. No way. Yes. I have not seen it. I saw the trailer. One of them is the killer. Stop. Trust me. Yeah. No. Okay. What else is going on, Ben?

All right, before recommendations, we'll keep it short for Duncan this week because we went so long last week. This is just another old person, middle-aged thing. My wife and I, with some friends, went to a new restaurant this week. just kind of in the middle of nowhere in northern Michigan. It was on a golf course, and there's a farm in the background. It's called the Farmhouse. And this place was spectacular. It looked awesome. The vibes were great. The food was absolutely amazing.

If I would have gone to a place like that and I was young, I'd be like, oh, this place is pretty cool and never think of it again. My wife and I were talking about this restaurant for like the next 24 hours. I can't believe how awesome. It felt like a New York kind of restaurant.

And that's the kind of thing when you're older that you get excited about. Finding a new restaurant. When you're young, I don't care. I didn't remember what the name of that place was. I don't remember what I had to eat last week. When you're older, you find a new restaurant. It's like you tell everyone about it. Yeah, it's a big topic of conversation amongst 40-year-olds. Right? Did you guys try the new place down the street yet?

Amazing. No, I'm dying to. Yes. Oh, we're definitely going to go next time. All right. I got some recommendations. Look, you got nothing in here this week. No, I just recommended 28 years later. Okay. I got two this week. We watched The Accountant 2. on Amazon Prime. And I don't know if this went to the theaters or not, or if it was straight Amazon Prime. Okay. Did you watch Accountant 1, the first one? I did love it. See, I liked it.

I honestly, my wife and I were talking before we watched this. I don't remember what, I remember. It's very forgettable. I saw it recently. Again, it's very forgettable. I kind of liked it. The second one, I feel like had no connection to the first one at all, like a little bit, minorly.

But then Jon Bernthal is the brother, who I think he was in the first one a little bit. Again, I don't remember it. It's a totally unnecessary movie. Didn't need to be made. Completely unnecessary. And I was totally entertained. great, like there was some great scenes with Affleck and Bernthal. And Bernthal is probably the best character actor there is right now. Bernthal's the best. He is so, so, he has so many good lines in this. And again, a totally forgettable, like,

unnecessary movie that was completely entertaining and I totally enjoyed myself. Did you see We Own… What is it? We Own This… We Own This City. Did you see that? On HBO? The Bernthal miniseries? Oh, yeah. Yeah. That was pretty good. He's awesome. He's the cop. He's great. Yeah, he's the Baltimore cop. All right. And so the new Owen Wilson show on Apple called Stick. Have you seen this yet? I saw two episodes. I don't love it. Okay. My wife and I plowed through five episodes this week.

It's a little bit of a coming age, but it's one of these shows where you don't have to invest a lot of yourself in it. It's just light and breezy and entertaining. And you know what always, always works? So in the fifth episode… They did a montage. Put a song. You can see people talking. You can't hear what they're saying. It's like the fast forward button.

Yeah, we're going to this town. We're going to this town. So it's a road trip show. It's golf. It's got a little bit of heart on it because there's people dealing with grief in the show. But it's not the kind of show you have to be totally invested in. It's just very light. And I was thinking.

Owen Wilson just always plays himself. He literally is the same character in this show that he is in Wedding Crashers, and he looks exactly the same. He's got literally the same haircut still as he always had. He's the best. But he's the best. He plays himself, but he, I mean, it seems like he's playing, I don't know. My wife and I both really liked it. Marc Maron plays the sidekick. I like, I really am into it. We've plowed through that one very quickly. Okay. I have another quasi-rec.

It's not a wreck. It's just a movie that I saw that I liked, but it was fun, but underwhelming. And it was just a little, vibes were weird. You ever see Plane with Gerard Butler? Okay, it's funny because I was having this conversation last night with my wife. It felt like Hollow. Like, I should have loved that movie. But do you ever go on Netflix or one of your streamers and you see they have the continue watching thing and it shows you the movie that shows you're watching?

And you see something that your spouse is watching and you go, what the fuck? What are you watching that? She was watching Plane. That's bizarre. And I wanted to be like, what are you watching this piece of garbage for? You watching it, I get. Plane was a… high-quality piece of garbage. Okay. Yeah. Total junk. I mean, it's a Gerard Butler movie. I have a man crush on Gerard Butler. I love him. But aren't all of his movies high-quality pieces of garbage? Let's be honest. Yeah. Well...

No offense to him. He's carved out a nice lane. 300 was not garbage. So watch your mouth. Careful. Okay. Do not talk about Leonidas that way. That movie's okay. That's a great movie. All right. We went long again. Not bad. As you hear this, we will be recording a live show at the Morningstar Conference on Navy Pier in Chicago, which should be out as like a bonus episode. And we're going to do something a little different for that, so that should be fun.

Come say hi if you're there. Anything else? Hey, stay cool in the heat. Okay. I got no time for weather. Sorry. Bed hates weather talk. That's true. But what else is there to talk about? No, that was it. You just say, yeah, stay cool. All right. Go f*** yourself, San Diego. All right. Thanks to the production team. As always, email us animalspirits at compoundnews.com. We'll see you next time.