FRESH-UP Study: Liberal Fluid Intake Versus Fluid Restriction in Chronic Heart Failure - podcast episode cover

FRESH-UP Study: Liberal Fluid Intake Versus Fluid Restriction in Chronic Heart Failure

Apr 15, 202510 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Fluid restriction is often recommended for heart failure (HF) patients to prevent congestion, but its benefits and safety are unclear. The FRESH-UP study is the first to show that strict fluid restriction does not improve health status for chronic, symptomatic HF patients and may increase thirst distress without reducing mortality, hospitalization, acute kidney injury, or medication needs.

In this interview, Roland RJ van Kimmenade, MD and Alison L. Bailey, MD, FACC discuss the impacts of the FRESH-UP study and how liberal fluid intake is safe for chronic HF patients, even enhancing their well-being. Providers are encouraged to reconsider universal fluid restrictions and adopt a more individualized approach.

RELATED REFERENCES:

  1. Herrmann JJ, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Baltussen LE, et al. Liberal Fluid Intake Versus Fluid Restriction in Chronic Heart Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Nat Med 2025;Mar 30:[Epub ahead of print].

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android