The Tucker Carlson Problem (with Naomi Klein) - podcast episode cover

The Tucker Carlson Problem (with Naomi Klein)

May 16, 20261 hr 36 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Summary

Naomi Klein and Matt Bernstein dissect Tucker Carlson's confusing anti-Israel rhetoric, revealing it as a tactic to promote Christian nationalism and isolationism. They discuss the MAGA civil war, the rise of "Gruper" ideology, and how the liberal establishment's inability to challenge power or define terms has created a vacuum, allowing the far right to appear rational. The conversation warns against dangerous alliances and emphasizes the urgent need for a strong, inclusive left to combat emerging forms of fascism.

Episode description

Tucker Carlson has emerged as one of the most influential voices opposing the U.S. relationship to Israel. He’s also anti-Trump. So is he your friend now? Today, the inimitable Naomi KIein makes her A Bit Fruity debut to explain the Right’s burgeoning realignment, why the Republican successor to Trump could be so much scarier (sorry), and how an inept Liberal establishment made the rise of an antisemitic nationalist movement inevitable. And, of course, what we can do.

Listen to bonus episodes on Patreon!

Thanks to today’s sponsors!

Sleep and dream well! Visit https://helixsleep.com/fruity to take advantage of their Memorial Day Sale exclusive partner offer — that’s 27% off sitewide.

Get 15% off a cuter, more sustainable way to clean at https://www.blueland.com/fruity

Naomi is currently platformless, but please preorder her forthcoming book, End Times Fascism. It will be brilliant.

Also, read Doppelganger.

Find me on Instagram.

Find A Bit Fruity on Instagram.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

The Evolving Tucker Carlson Problem

A

The fascist job is to take that anger, acknowledge it, and redirect it, right? Redirect it at the scapegoats and at at the left. why Tucker's never gonna be our friend. But I, you know, I think that this is the vision that he that he represents. And it's a it's a really bleak vision. It's a really grim vision. And, you know, I think people can make short-term alliances that will end up backfiring on them very, very badly.

🎵 Music

Welcoming Naomi Klein to the Show

B

A bit fruity. I'm Matt Bernstein. I'm so happy that you're here. I was at a talk the other night about Palestine and the art world when during the QA section, someone asked the panelists what they thought about Tucker Carlson. Most people in the room nervously laughed and shifted in their chairs. Tucker Carlson, who when I started this podcast three years ago, was on Fox News complaining about how the green MM is no longer sexy.

Simpler times, right? Take me back. I guess? I don't know. I never thought I'd yearn for that time. Anyway.

H

The green Eminem, you will notice, is no longer wearing sexy boots. Now she's wearing sensible sneakers. Leading women do not wear sexy boots. Leading women wear frumpy shoes, the frumpier the better. That's the rule. The other big change is that the Brown Eminem has quote transitioned from high stilettos to lower block heels. Also less sexy. That's progress.

Eminem's will not be satisfied until every last cartoon character is deeply unappealing and totally androgynous, until the moment you wouldn't want to have a drink with any one of them. That's the goal. When you're totally turned off, We've achieved equity.

Tucker Carlson's Anti-Israel Shift

B

Tucker has emerged as one of the most prominent critics of the US relationship with Israel, though not of Israel in and of itself, but let's put a pin in that.

H

Why does this tiny country have so much control over our government? How do you break the stranglehold of the Israeli lobby on the US government? Why is a country of nine million people? Able to dictate terms to a country of three hundred and fifty million people. The government of Israel is promoting the largest pride event in the history of the region this June in the Dead Sea, very close to, by the way, Sodom and Gomorrah.

B

He's broken with Donald Trump, who he's campaigned for three separate times over this issue, and his opposition to the USAID for Israel. has made him a tempting and contentious and confusing figure on the left, where we've been attempting for long before I was born, frankly, to build power around the Palestinian cause. And to find something that looks like power in Tucker Carlson, one of the conservative movement's most formidable figures is, at least to me.

confusing on the surface. You know, I'm an anti-Zionist because Israel is a state founded upon an ethno religious hierarchy, which is enshrined in their legal system at every level. The genocide in Gaza and now bombardment of Lebanon are downstream consequences of a state held together by these values. And my values are that all human beings are equal, all humans of all races, religions, genders, sexualities, etcetera.

For decades, Tucker Carlson and his ilk have demonstrated that they do not share this view about human beings and equality. So their seemingly sudden and very strong stance against Israel are sure politically useful, but if it's not coming from a human rights-based framework, then where exactly is it coming from?

And where might it lead? To disentangle all of this today, which many of you have asked me to do, I am joined by the one and only Naomi Klein, author of many books, including Doppelganger and the Shock Doctrine, as well as her forthcoming book. End times fascism. Pre-order link in the episode description. Naomi, welcome to the show, your a bit fruity debut.

A

Thank you so much, Matt. It's great to be with you.

B

No me I don't wanna be like a a weirdo. But I really am so excited to have you here. And I'm sure many young people on the left have told you this. You are just a very important figure to me and my growth and my ideas. Um, I did a a slate of live shows last summer for this podcast and one time during the Q and A section at one of my shows, someone asked me, like, who's your dream guest? And I was like, Well

Naomi Klein. You are, you know, also an anti-Zionist Jew who's older than me. And when we consider like the generational divide that often happens in Jewish families around Israel. you have just been like such a sort of like comforting presence in my belief that people can change um and can learn and can shift and thank anyway. Thank you so much for being here. It's really exciting.

A

That is really beautiful to hear. Um I wish we were talking about something a little more fun. What we're gonna be talking about today. But it's still gonna be fun.

B

But we o yeah, we on this podcast we always make it.

A

And I appreciate I I really appr I'm here because I I really appreciate your voice and and all the work that you do and it gives me great hope and inspiration. So it's mutual. Thanks for having me.

B

I'm gonna leave that in though.

Ha ha.

Tucker's Ambiguous Political Strategy

B

Naomi, I feel like everyone and their mother lately has been opining about what exactly is the new role of Tucker Carlson. The New York Times just put out a two hour long interview with him. Titled What Does Tucker Carlson Really Believe? accompanied by an editorial photo shoot.

Side note, I I think that a lot of the speculation around this makes it out to be like a more like sexy and mysterious belief system than what he actually has. But anyway, we have a lot to talk about. I'd love to hear your top line thoughts.

A

Well, I I do think he makes it a little deliberately ambiguous. where he is politically because he is a smart entrepreneur and he is appealing to different audiences simultaneously and and I think signaling to different audiences and also because We live in this age where most people don't subject themselves to like an hour and a half podcast, but just see the little clip. You can put out little clips that are very carefully edited.

to appeal to one particular group and then another clip from the same show to appeal to a completely different group, right? And so I think that's part of what's been happening is just the kind of clip culture, right? So we then project Our values into what we don't hear, right? So if you hear somebody who seems to care a lot about the genocide in Palestine.

then you kind of assume that that person also cares about Palestinian human rights more broadly, might want to help Palestinian refugees, has more of an internationalist perspective, and you kind of fill in the blanks, right? So I don't think it's entirely clear, but just in knowing we were gonna have this conversation, I did listen to some of the recent episodes in full.

B

Of Tucker Carlson?

A

Yeah, didn't you? Did you do your homework?

B

I mean, I have listened to a lot of Tucker Carlson over time, but like the fact that I subjected you to that research beforehand I feel a little badly.

A

No, I mean you know I have this weird thing, right? Like where I've listened to hundreds of hours of Steve Bannon, so it's good for me to diversify it.

Unpacking Christian Nationalist Ideology

B

That's it.

A

I've been researching the right for a really long time. But I I I was struck you know just last week he interviewed somebody for an episode the the headline was Somali fraud expose, right? So I'm like, he's still doing that. Like'cause the in the clips that we see, he's often just he'll often say something like, Well, I believe all people are equal. That's what conservatism is. I'm like, is it? Is that what like

F

As a Catholic, I could not agree more with you. Yes. In what you're saying. I love all people, even the ones that don't like us. We have to love them all, and we have to recognize that.

H

We're required to be able to do that.

F

Yeah.

A

And then it's like, okay, so does is that what Tucker now thinks? But no, he's still you know smearing entire groups of people by their ethnicity with headlines like Somali fraud expose. And he also was Getting talking about the Great Replacement again. You know, it was talking about Somali fraud in the context of the Great Replacement in that episode.

He also was talking about that that it's you know, he talks about how it's natural to have a preference for your racial group, right? So it's essentially Christian nationalism that he that he's doing and I think he has been working very hard to break the ironclad relationship between the United States and Israel and also right-wing Christianity and Zionism.

And he's been on a concerted campaign. And in that work, he's done some really uh revealing and I think important interviews with figures like Mike Huckabee, Ted Cruz. Uh Avram Berg, former Speaker of the Israeli Knesset, where he asked questions that it would be nice if

the New York Times asked them, you know, or if his old employer at Fox News asked them about what theology is guiding them, what the end game is. You know, here I'm thinking about the interview with Ted Cruz where, you know, he was really getting at like Yeah, what is the theological basis on which you are basing this idea that there is a duty to support the state of Israel, right?

G

I was taught from the Bible. Those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who curse Israel will be cursed. And from my perspective, I want to be on the blessing side of it.

H

Of the g those who bless the government of Israel?

G

Those who bless Israel is what it says. It doesn't say the government of, it says the nation of Israel. So that's in the Bible. I as a Christian, I believe.

H

Where is that?

B

I'd better be able to do that.

G

I can find it to you.

H

It's in Genesis, but so you're quoting a a Bible phrase. You don't have context for it and you don't know where in the Bible it is, but that's like your theology? I'm confused. What does that even mean?

G

Yeah. Tucker.

H

I'm a Christian, I want to know what you're talking about.

A

Like he got him on record on some really important things that nobody had gotten him on record before. Same thing with Mike Huckabee, where it was like if we're using the Bible as the real estate deed, where does that start?

H

Stop you've appealed to Genesis. Genesis fifteen. says it's Abram receives from God the news that his descendants will inherit the land. And you tell me as the as the theologian if I'm getting this wrong, but from the Euphrates to the Nile. And that would include like basically the entire Middle East. Christian Zionism, I want to go back'cause that's where we started. What does that mean? Does Israel have the right

that land because you're appealing to Genesis. You're saying that's the original deed. It would be fine if they took it all.

A

You know, for this book that Astra Taylor and I have been working on for a year now on anti fascism, you know, we use those quotes because nobody else got these guys on record, right?

B

Uh-huh.

A

I wanna acknowledge that he's do like i he's doing some journalism that's really important. But what's the broader end goal for Tucker Carlson as a political figure, which is where this gets really complicated and he h he his name comes up as a possible presidential candidate, right?

B

Mm-hmm.

A

And I think that the the goal is to break the Judeo-Christian fusion, right? This idea that the US is a Judeo-Christian nation. No, he says it's a Christian nation. Right. And this idea that the sort of theological duty is linked to creating a greater Israel. He's trying to break that and basically throwing his lot in with the idea that the New Jerusalem is the United States.

and that you want to bunker down with your Christian nation. So it's very tied to Portrace Borders and also the kind of ethnic cleansing that we're seeing, you know, on the streets of US City. Um that's that's part of the project. I mean, he thinks there should be more deportations. Yes. Yeah. I mean, that's who he is. It's complicated. And I think that w within the context of the movements that you and I have

both been a part of and are a part of. I think that the people who are going like, Hey, maybe he's our great friend, you know, and maybe maybe he's a great gift to these movements or whatever I think that's really a story of a failure of solidarity. That I think when when solidarity fails, w when multiracial democracy fails, when internationalism fails. as a promise of security and we're, you know, almost three years into a genocide that is ongoing.

I think people start looking for strong men. They start looking for for the for their own bully, right? And I think that that's what what Tucker maybe represents to some people. So I think it's a sad story, right? I think it's a really sad story about the failure of solidarity and the vacuum that gets created when that happens. And it's it's it's a pattern that's repeated in history.

Manosphere's Dangerous Anti-Zionist Fusion

B

Mm-hmm. You just covered So many amazing bases that we're gonna get into in a little bit more depth, but I first wanted to show you a very bizarre clip that was my first exposure to right wing in heavy air quotes anti-Zionism. And this came from uh Jubilee. Are you familiar with Jubilee? Yeah. Oh you are.

A

Well I I saw s the one Medi did, the gang up thing.

B

You you have been in the weeds with political slop content. It's nice to know that we're all there together. Jubilee, for those who don't know, it's a YouTube content farm that purports to foster honest dialogue and inspire human connection. but in practice makes videos like this one called Is Being Fat a Choice? Fit Men versus Fat Men? In it, Myron Gaines, a far right podcaster who's representing the Fit Men side, says the following

C

Unfortunately, some people have emotional stuff that happened, um, traumatic stuff that's happened, so you can't discount and just say, Oh, because they're fat.

I

Woohoo man. Like it there's way worse stuff going out in the world versus people saying, Oh my god, I'm sad, I'm gonna eat some f ice cream. It's like, no, dude, it's like you're fat, you made that decision.

You live in the best country ever. If you live in a civilized first world country where you have electricity, internet power, etcetera, you deserve to be bullied. It's ridiculous to me that we have all these fat people running around. Meanwhile, people are being bombed in Gaza. It's ridiculous.

A

Yeah. That's so interesting.

B

It is so interesting. And the first time I heard that, I was like Wait, okay. So this is like this this guy is just like straightforwardly like bullying a fat person. Okay, like dime a dozen. We've seen this. And then at the end where he's like, Boo hoo, people are being bombed in Gaza. I'm like, wait a minute.

A

Well look, this is this is where I think the Democrats liberalism generally left a Texas sized vacuum that now the far right is moving into and it's intersecting with kind of edgelord culture, troll culture, whatever you want to call it, right? Where you create a taboo, you create an unspeakable thing, right? And maybe that's just saying fat people deserve to be bullied.

Or maybe it's, you know, using the R word or whatever it is. I mean, we know that we're we're in this sort of festival of saying unsayable things and getting lots of views and monetizing it world, right? That's where we are. And one of those taboos is also uh talking about the genocide in Gaza, which is bonkers, but they have absolutely fused. And you see that, I mean, I I'm not s really steeped in manosphere culture, right?

B

Okay. Nice to know that you have a line.

A

But I did watch that that Netflix documentary. And that was that that was all over it. Like all these guys were like they they they would just suddenly, all of a sudden, at the same sort of time, they all just Started doing this a similar line crossing using the genocide. And that's when I realized we were well and truly. I don't think that's why you had me on the show. You probably wanted hope from me.

Language Degradation and Right-Wing Disarray

B

We'll find hope. I promise we'll find hope. At least I'll find hope by the end. But you're so right. And the way Something that looks like anti-Zionism has infiltrated these manosphere spaces. And you saw it bizarrely at the Kevin Hart roast that just happened a couple nights ago. Where Shane Shane Gillis Gillis, someone tell me how it's pronounced, it's fine. I don't really care much about the man, to be honest. But he called out Chelsea Handler for being a Zionist.

C

I'm not saying that's good or bad. Speaking of dead kids, she's a big fan of abortion.

B

Now, if that came from like a left-wing figure, I'd be like, yes, I I I as a celebrity political person would love to talk about Chelsea Handler being a Zionist, but Shane Gillis is Like his whole thing is that he's a racist. And so it just seemed like such a strange thing, but also I think something that we're gonna get into here. Is that the far right has a long history of sort of ping ponging around between scapegoats. And I think what they are doing, while again on the surface, it can look

helpful. It can look like, yeah, call out Chelsea Handler is uh in this and you see someone like Nick Fuentes doing this very explicitly. They are Man, it's like p fucking the ADL has made it like impossible for me to like talk about anti Semitism in this way.

A

It's brutal, right? Because you find yourself, as you pointed out, I'm significantly older than you and I have been getting called a self-hating Jew and facing people who who equate criticism of the state of Israel, criticism of Zionism with anti Semitism. and accusing me of being an anti therefore an anti Semite for since I was in college, which was a really long time ago, you know.

And now when you actually see far right figures doing the thing that you have been accused of, you're like you're speechless, right? You don't there's they like the language that you need to describe reality is now has been so degraded. That it is no longer useful, right? And this has been going on with a lot of words, right? I mean, I wrote about it in Doppelganger, just that feeling of speechlessness.

When

A

Steve Bannon is talking about fascism and othering, right? You're like, well well, what words are left, right?

B

Uh-huh.

A

I think that's what you're talking about.

The Right's Internal MAGA Conflicts

B

I want to tell the story of the five years. Tucker Carlson um arriving at this moment, which involves a lot of other people. And I think inherent to that story is the MAGA civil war. Naomi, for those out of the loop, can you explain this sort of conservative civil war eruption that I think has accelerated a lot in the wake of Charlie Kirk's death. I know you also wrote about this in your book.

A

Well, I think it has a lot to do with what with this sort of economy that we're talking about.'Cause it is an economy. The influencer economy is is a huge one and it's part of broader economy that is sort of feeding off of instability and crisis and It accelerated during the pandemic when people were everything was mediated through screens, lost their in-person communities, were frightened, you know, are finding their parasocial relationship. I'm not going to explain the internet to you. And so

B

You could explain anything to me. I would be very excited about it.

A

I think that Trump came back to power really using the right wing influencer sphere to his benefit, as we know. I mean he he sidestepped a lot of of mainstream media and did the podcast tour and it all worked fantastically well for him, then it started to fall apart because for them, for for for the people you know, who who are making a living off of this and are building empires around it.

It actually is not a good business model just to echo the president. I mean, that's what Fox News is doing. But that can't be what Tucker Carlson and Candace Owen are doing now that they don't have a boss, right? I mean, they're running their own companies. So I think that there are that there were some real issues where people had splits over, including Israel.

But I also think there's this broader issue wh where they're all competing with each other. It when they fight i they get clicks. And I mean I thought the left was brutal, Matt, but would you really

B

Oh my god, right? Because my whole life I've heard especially from like the center liberals who are like, Why don't we especially recently where it's like, Why don't we just fall in line? Why don't we just fall in line behind this candidate or that candidate, Boat Blue, no matter who, yada yada, yada, yada. Leftist purity testing. You never stop hearing about leftist purity testing.

Okay, a separate conversation. But the adage, right, forever has been like the the Republicans, they just fall in line. Naomi Klein, I don't think so.

A

so and this is one of the like I mean there's so many things that social media has given us that are terrible, but when it comes but they have also destroyed the right. It has also destroyed the right. And it it it is and I love it. Like I I love the MAGA Civil War.

B

Yeah.

A

I think it is it is a tremendous gift. They have created a vacuum that if there was a functioning left party in the United States, it would be having a field day right now. Because they as you know, I mean, they are so messy. They are accusing each other of being feds. They're accusing each other of being trans. They're accusing each other of all kinds of things.

B

Ha ha ha.

MAGA vs. America First Factions

F

Look, Tucker, that's why I'm sitting here, you know? Right. I mean because we had a contentious dialogue for

H

I thought you were a fed.

F

And I thought you were a fad.

A

It was a

F

Yeah.

H

Yeah.

A

mentioned Charlie Kirk. I mean Charlie Kirk was very much sort of a part of this. Things got very ugly between him and Nick Fuentes. And it was really like who is gonna be the most powerful influencer on the right. And to get your piece of the action, you've got to attack each other, then you have to have a collab, come back together, make peace. You know, they're just playing the game.

I think that when Kirk died, it's it's worth remembering that the Trump administration thought that they were gonna be able to use that to actually fix some of this because it predated it was it was happening before, it was happening over Israel. Kirk had taken a lot of flack for inviting Tucker to speak at the big turning point conference. He was getting pressure from donors. He was starting to talk about it publicly. It was starting to come out. It was it was splintering. Then he's

murdered and JD Vance is guest hosting his podcast. Remember that? Then they have the huge memorial and the unified message from the entire cabinet who's are all speaking is now we come together and kill the left. This was not one assassin. It was the entire left that killed Charlie Kirk because it's a violent ideology. And that lasted for about five seconds.

B

I remember that. They were all like the left killed Charlie Kirk, which like

A

It was very scary.

B

Yeah. It was very scary. And also like whether or not the left even killed Charlie Kirk, whether the individual shooter I mean, jury's still out. We haven't even gotten a trial yet. But it was it was very scary. I was like, oh no, like I mean, people were genuinely concerned there could be like a broader civil war over some of the rhetoric that the Trump administration was using over Charlie Kirk's death.

A

wasn't just rhetoric. They were also saying we're gonna go after the funders. We're gonna I mean they were using it yeah as a political tool to try to destroy the the funding infrastructure for the left and to try to criminalize specific groups. And they were starting to arrest people over it. I mean, it was not and people were losing their jobs. I mean it was a very serious campaign. And if this si MAGA civil war had not happened.

I think i we'd be in a different world. So I I I actually think it's very good that the right is splintering. It's always good when the right is splintering.

B

Yeah.

A

Let's not lose sight of the big

B

picture. That whole I remember like Charlie's Murderers dot com. It was like anyone who posted Like anything less than sympathetic about Charlie Kirk in the wake of his death had was doxxed on this website. Yeah, that lasted all of two days and then the the right started to eat itself. Ideologically, where we are now with the MAGA Civil War, for those who uh aren't Super tuned in, there are basically these two major warring factions. There is MAGA, right? Trump, Vance, people like Ben Shapiro.

Erica Kirk, the sort of like turning point establishment, basically the entirety of Fox News. These are traditional neoconservatives. They are very loyal to Trump. uh and they are very pro-Israel. Then there is the America First faction, which is made up of people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens.

The Gruper Ideology: Scarier Future

Marjorie Taylor Green, though she's no longer in government, uh, Nick Fuentes. And I think talking about the America First Faction will lead us. into what exactly does Tucker Carlson believe? To understand Tucker Carlson's belief, which I think we can boil down more efficiently than the New York Times did in that interview, I think it's helpful to first explain the Gruper. But first, I would love to take a quick break from the show to give a shout out to Helix for sponsoring today's.

You spend a third of your life in bed. And if you're like me and you work from home, or maybe you're just a very sleepy individual, you might spend a lot more than a third of your life in bed. So why settle for anything less than the best? Since I was young, I've always been personally a very devoted sleeper adult in my life. Have always told me that that'll wear off as I get older, but

Twenty-seven and going strong, so hallelujah, I guess. Anyway, my mattress means a lot to me, and getting a Helix mattress was a real treat to myself after Sleeping for many years on a mattress that I would say just got the job done. With Helix, you take a sleep quiz that will match you to your ideal mattress based on your preferences.

They'll choose the fabric, the padding, the layers, the height, all for your perfect night of sleep. In case you're wondering, I got the Helix Midnight Mattress and well. I've been sleeping. Helix was recently named one of USA Today's most trusted brands of 2026. And every mattress comes with a 120 night sleep trial and lifetime warranty. Best of all, Helix is currently running their Memorial Day sale. So if you would like to check it out, you can go to Helix.com.com.

Helixleep.com slash fruity for twenty-seven percent off. That is helixsleep.com slash fruity. And now let's get back to the show. Nanmy Klein, what do you know about the

A

I mean, I think that they are the the ground zero of the transgression culture that we were talking about earlier. The name itself speaks to the the kind of rebranding of what used to just be called neo Nazi culture with something that maybe it's a joke, maybe it's not a joke. Can we take any of it seriously? Is it all said with a wink? So it's it's a it's a little bit harder to pin down. But I think you'd probably explain it way better than me.

B

The Grupers are I mean, first and foremost, they're fans of the influencer streamer Nick Fuentes. But they're much more than that. Uh the the Grupers, the ideological backbone of the group is ultra, ultra, ultra nativist. They are very explicitly white Christian nationalists. They want to build an America that is full of white Christians and only white Christians.

The Gruipers hate Donald Trump. They really hate Donald Trump because he in their eyes has not gone far enough. They view him as a sort of fake authoritarian who doesn't have the balls to be a real authoritarian. The Gruipers are highly motivated by the Great Replacement Theory, which says that Jews are conspiring to undermine white power in the United States by importing immigrants and, of course, wokeness.

And you know, who has been the greatest purveyor of the great replacement theory in US media?

A

Tucker Carlson.

B

Tucker Carlson. And so while the Gripers they are first and foremost fans of Nick Fuentes. I think they are also sort of ground zero and perhaps the most extreme version of this emerging America First movement that seeks to go a lot further than MAGA. So I just wanna add here that like while I love to see that Ben Shapiro's media company is currently falling apart, fired potentially half of its employees.

His YouTube numbers, despite having like 18 million times more subscribers than I do, are lower than mine. Good job, guys. You know, I worry that the faction of the right that will succeed the MAGA movement is scarier.

Left's Opportunity Amid Right-Wing Splits

A

Yeah, well absolutely. Absolutely. I mean this is why I said, you know, I love I love when the when the right splinters, because it's an opportunity for the left to put forward a vision that explains Some of the main issues that there are being tapped into, but with an actual systemic analysis that talks about capitalism, that talks about

how we ended up with what's being called the Epstein class, how we ended up with the billionaire class, that that provides that systemic analysis and also real solutions, real policies that are going to make people's lives better. I would be remiss if I didn't say that I think the the politician who has shown how to do this right is Aran Mamdani who, you know, talked to Trump voters the day after the election and

basically said, okay, so you voted for him because the economy is busted and your life sucks and you're mad about US wars and your tax dollars going to maybe bomb your relative somewhere else. Um How do you feel about a rent freeze and how do you feel about free public transit? And enough people said yes, and ten percent of people who voted for Trump voted for Mamdani. You know, that's part of the reason why he won.

So I'm not saying that all those people should be written off or that there isn't any overlap. The question is how you build those coalitions, right? So I think there is an opportunity here for the left. We know what it looks like. We know how to do it. Problem is people in power in the Democratic Party don't want to do it. And you're absolutely right that what comes after Trump, if the right wins, is clearly a much worse version of Trumpism. And

You know, it's it's it's a truer form of fascism. And I think that that's what both Fuentes and and Tucker Carlson are are teeing up.

Fascism's Scapegoat Strategy: Protecting Capitalism

B

Yeah, and and Tucker can articulate sort of a more polite version of this, whereas Nick Fuentes is more bombastic. Nick Fuentes uh has said of his movement, quote, there are basically two things going on, white genocide and Jewish subversion. So it doesn't really get more bald faced than that. He's also said, quote, My problem with Trump is not that he's Hitler. My problem with Trump is that he is not Hitler.

A

Right. And I think a lot of the people who are angry at Trump are angry because he hasn't deported enough people or that he's just kind of making a show of it and not then the numbers aren't there. They want the numbers because this is their economic policy. This is, you know, if you are willing to almost go there in terms of diagnosing the problem, it is genuinely very dangerous, right? If you're willing to talk about the Epstein class, but you're not willing to talk about capitalism.

Mm. That that's what the Nazis did essentially, right? They they talked about Jewish capitalism. um which was uh you know uh this idea that capitalism had been perverted by the Jewish bankers or the you know that that there was kind like if you could just purge this poison within the otherwise healthy body of capitalism, then things would be fine. And that's what the project was. And they understood, you know, this these dynamics always emerge

when the system itself is in crisis, when people are hurting, right? That was the case in the nineteen thirties after after the the First World War, after the punishing sanc sanctions on Germany. The the wreckage

And then

A

the market crash of nineteen twenty nine and people are really, really hurting and socialism is rising, right? You have the Russian Revolution, you have a socialist worldview that says this has to spread to every country. You have elites who are terrified that it is going to happen in Germany, in Italy. And that's why they go after the communists and they go after the scapegoats, right? The the vulnerable scapegoats. It's always a twin project.

right of going after the left, going after the possibility of an alternative. And it harnesses that ball of anger that is gonna go somewhere, right? And the left's job is to make sure that the anger goes up at the system itself. And the fascist's job is to take that anger, acknowledge it, and redirect it, right? Redirect it.

The Right's Dangerous 'Almost There' Solutions

That's why Tucker's never gonna be our friend. And the other thing that I think is really important to remember is that case say he is running or some Or or he's gonna back somebody who he believes will do a better job. He sometimes says he's too lazy to be president. Maybe true, may not be true. As we're seeing, you don't even have to be awake to be president. So I you know.

B

I just Not to interrupt you, I just kind of think that Tucker Carlson is happy being like a rich podcaster. That is my reason why I don't right now think he's gonna run for president, but I am very willing to be wrong.

A

I I don't know. I I really don't know. I mean, you could have said the same thing about Trump.

B

That's true.

A

He will certainly play a role in US politics that is pushing this ideology, whether it's him or or some surrogate. I mean it could be Vance, right? I mean they're they're pretty close and it it remains to be seen.

B

Something that you talked about in Doppelganger that really stayed with me, which I would tell people to go read that book, but and and they should, but I have also recommended that book, like in six different episodes of this podcast. So, you know.

A

Get the new one. It's almost

B

So get the new one.

A

It's the sequel.

B

I was so excited to see you were writing a book because I was like, A, I'm excited to read another Naomi Klein book and B, when people are releasing their books, they are more susceptible to taking the bait on podcast invitations.

A

We'll be back with Astra in September.

B

But one thing that you wrote about in Doppelganger is how fascists are very good at taking large groups of people, correctly helping them identify the problem, and then giving them the wrong solution. And in the context of that book, you were talking about how it's like we don't have guaranteed healthcare in this country, among a lot of other things. And so it's very tempting to then buy into what like a a a Nazi wellness influencer is selling you.

in making your healthcare not like a community oriented thing where we all take care of each other, but where like you just like lift as heavy as you can and have as much like protein and creatine and no vaccines and be the strongest soldier and it's all up to you and Individual, individual, individual.

Elite Critique vs. Systemic Change

And of course a lot of people did take that bait and then buy into this like Maha movement. But this strikes me as a similar thing where people are like, Yeah, it is fucked up that Donald Trump facilitated a cover-up of the Epstein files. Yeah, it is fucked up that they're gutting food stamps and sending our tax dollars overseas.

uh to to kill people in the name of another foreign country. I think the left could seize and and and the broader left is seizing on this moment and saying, you know, the issue of all of this is capitalism. Uh, the issue is this sort of like global elite class protecting each other at the expense of all the rest of us. But the Democrats And sort of like this center establishment left that is funded by all the same people as the Republican Party.

They can't do that because it threatens their whole structure. And so in place of that, you have these right-wing figures coming in and saying, you know what the problem is and why this is all happening? The global jewelry. Of which Epstein was a part of.

A

Yeah, I mean I just because of you, I listened to Tucker's episode with Thomas Massey, which was really an interesting episode. And what's happening to Thomas Massey is extraordinary.

B

For those who don't know, he's a a Republican congressperson who did help uh unite with Rokana, who's a Democrat, to uh force the release of half of the Epstein files.

A

I fully back that that kind of bipartisanship. They got the Epstein files released and now he is facing how much money is being spent against him? Ten million dollars. It's a lot for for for for this race. And he said the same people that are in the Epstein files are funding the campaign against him, are funding the ballroom, are funding the arch, right? And

It's like almost there, right? But it's dangerous to be almost there and not go all the way there. But at the same time, you know, Thomas Massey. supports, you know, he s calls himself a libertarian. He supports all the tax cuts. He supports all the deregulation that created the billionaire class that is now coming for him, right?

So, you know, it's less to me about whether Thomas Massey and Tucker Carlson are willing to go all the way there and explain the system than whether the Democrats will, whether whether we have an organized left that is powerful enough. to take over that party and win is what Bernie tried to do, right? And I guess this this is where I you know, I think one of the more dispiriting things that happened was a kind of pile on on AOC for criticizing Marjorie Taylor Greene.

B

I can we'll circle back to that.

A

Okay, we'll come back. Sorry. I got ahead of the plan.

B

No, please, please, please, please.

The Ideology of Tribalism and Ethnostates

A

But I I guess just just that point, right? That going almost there but not going all the all the way there is is a pretty dangerous place to be, especially if you're Jewish.

B

And it's also, I mean, if you're someone like Tucker, if you're someone like Thomas Massey and you are looking for a way to accrue power and tap into people's real desires and real disillusionment without actually challenging power. Then this sort of, as you say, making it almost all the way there, and then at the last minute, like pivoting right, is a great way to do that. Because the hard thing about being on the left.

Is that at the end of the day, you have to be like, yeah, the problem is, for example, billionaires. billionaires are really hard to topple. But what if you're Tucker Carlson or or Nick Fuentes, who does it like sort of, I think, more nakedly, and he goes all the way there. And then at the last second he's like, and the problem is transgender people and the Jews. That is a it's just a lot easier to punch down.

A

Well let's talk about the Epstein files for a minute because um thanks to Thomas Massey and Rokana and most especially the women who were abused by Epstein and refused to be silenced and came together and you know, built this movement and the journalists who covered it when nobody else would. We don't have all the Epstein files, but we have some of them, including After the Brexit referendum, this was actually an email from Epstein to Peter Thiel.

B

The most evil gay guy.

A

Where he um said, as we were ta saying in your office, pivot to tribalism. The basically they saw the Brexit referendum as the beginning of an age of collapse, right? This is why Astro and I call it end times fascism, because they're sort of celebrating that this is all going down and they're all gonna whether they're gonna colonize Mars or have the AI singularity or just have their sort of corporate city states.

You know, there's this sort of buffet of options. Uh Peter Thiel is investing in all of them, right? Um and Epstein and Thiel were talking about it and and what and and the way he articulated it was return to tribalism, right? It's interesting because Carlson has more in common with that worldview than he would like us to think, right? I mean he he's sort of standing up against the the Epstein class, but they agree that this is what this era is about.

return to what they call tribalism, which means everybody gets their little microethno state. And this is Carlson's great grievance. Everybody gets their identity politics but white men. This is what he's always complaining about. And this is, you know, where where the great replacement ideology comes in, but this is also what Fuentes represents to all of them. He's the white guy. who gets to have the identity politics that everybody else gets but but them.

B

Right, according to them.

A

According to them. But what how do you answer this? You answer this with a vision of the world of the future rooted in solidarity, which where everybody everybody has a place, right? Everybody's included. sacrificed or thrown out. But I you know, I think that this is the vision that he that he represents and it's a it's a really bleak vision, it's a really grim vision. And, you know, I think people can make short term alliances that will end up backfiring on them very, very badly.

Building Bottom-Up Community Coalitions

B

Short-term alliance. That is uh is something that I think uh should stay with everyone. The New Yorker published a great piece about the Grupers called How the Internet Fringe Infiltrated Republican Politics. where they interviewed a young female groper. They exist. She encapsulated the Gruper ideology well when she said, quote, The administration will post TikTok videos of ice raids, but it's performative cruelty.

Not enough actual deportations were happening. We don't want illegal immigrants to live in fear. We just want them gone. That like took my breath away.

A

You know what's interesting about that is they are out of step. with most Republicans even. And they've come to understand this. Like after Minneapolis, there was a directive to the Republican Party ahead of the midterms not to talk about mass deportations, just to talk about criminal immigrants. Because there was such a significant backlash after the Minnesota uprising against ICE. And people saw like it's one thing to cheer for like a cool meme or something that like look

like your politics. It's another thing to actually see it happen, to see, you know, kids being tear gassed.

And

A

to see, you know, everyday Americans stand up and be heroic. I think that that moment really revealed that this isn't actually mass politics. It's for it is still fringe politics. And a lot, I don't know if it's a lot, but enough. Some Republicans spoke out, right? And said this is not what we want, you know, joined the protests in Minneapolis. And so this is another kind of fracturing that we're seeing on the right. And it's also it's an opportunity for coalition.

that is a bottom-up coalition of really figuring out, okay, what can we rebuild here? What kinds of of alliances that isn't the top down, you know, coalition uh with Tucker Carlson, but is people in their communities. deciding what kind of values they want to have and how they want to live with each other. And that is where I think we should place our hope. It's a little less flashy. It doesn't play out on social media, but it is happening in communities.

Finding Common Ground in Local Activism

across the US. It happened in New York in these sort of conversations that the Mamdani campaign facilitated with a hundred thousand volunteers. It happened in in in in Minnesota in the uprising against ICE. It's happening in this movement against data centers, which by some estimates has blocked almost half of the proposed data centers. It's happening in red key red really, really red parts of the country. I mean what really strikes me Matt is that

There was this a really interesting article in the New York Times a week ago. And the headline was The most bipartisan issue since beer, the data center uh opposition.

B

Okay.

A

Uh it was a quote from a a c a comedian who who used that line. It's such a good line. The the article described how these people who had blocked each other on Facebook over protests against trans brunches or or like or like sorry drag brunches.

B

Oh, there we go. There we go. It's like trans Brunch.

A

Drag drag brunch. It was a drag brunch and it was like somebody who ran like a it was a Christian Facebook group and they they had been at war over a drag brunch. Simply to say that the last issue that brought this many people to like local community meetings were like it's the culture it's the culture wars. It's what books to ban, it's vaccines, it's mask mandates, it's all the things I wrote about in dopp doppelganger.

But now people are coming together and saying, no, we would we don't want that data center and it's bringing communities together and it's healing wounds from the pandemic where people are like, okay, we we all agree we need water, you know, we need we don't want our electricity bills to go up. So there can be more AI generated slop and it can replace teachers and doctors.

And so, you know, there there's work to be done. And like I'm against the litmus test and all of that, but I I just don't trust these particular figures to lead that alliance, to lead that coming together.

Deconstructing Right-Wing Anti-Israelism

B

Well, I I wanna talk a little bit about the Israel of it all because I led with that and I think a lot of people are still like, But he's good on Israel, right? And it's like It's a hard kind of. Right. I told you beforehand, I was like, I'm making a Venn diagram. I'm not having Naomi Klein on my podcast and not making a Venn diagram. So, you know, just because someone's belief could look like yours.

And I don't even mean that it's like, oh, like maybe they arrived at your belief from a different place. It's like it is a different belief, I believe. I made this Venn diagram of the Gruper right, uh of which I would, you know, include Tucker loosely, and then the left. Do you have the outline? Sorry. Like I said, I don't have a producer for this podcast, it's just kinda like cobbled together with tape.

A

You made a nice craft. Did you make it yourself or did you use AI?

B

No, I made it myself. I just like I like I I went to like vennediagram.com and I like put in Ha ha ha

A

Okay.

B

On the Groper right side, uh unique to the Groiper right, I wrote there America first, anti immigrant, anti LGBT, white supremacist, uh, you know, very steeped in social conservatism, especially so with gender roles. anti-Semitism, and I wrote that they are billionaire friendly. And on the left, of course, pro-LGBT, pro-immigrant, racial equity, feminism, pro-worker, wealth redistribution, market regulation, stuff like that. What do these groups have in common?

The Gruper right and the left both believe Trump is a fraud. W I don't need to explain why the left thinks Trump is a fraud. I have told you that the Gruper right thinks that he's basically like a fake authoritarian who should be a real authoritarian. Uh they're both anti-Epstein class, and they are both anti-war and anti-Israel. Could you in your in your best ability, and I can join you on this, explain why this faction of the right is anti Israel?

A

Well... They are against money going to Israel because they are isolationist. They are, I think, again pro Israel lobbying has done to US politics in that they believe Israel has pulled the US into all kinds of wars and they

don't want to be fighting wars in other countries because they're isolationists once again. Like I'm not sure they're anti Israel and that they don't want Israel to exist. They don't want the US to help Israel because they don't want the US to help anyone. Yes. And They're Christian nationalists. So they reject the joining of the Judeo and the Christian. They just want the Christian. Did I miss anything?

Tucker's Conditional 'Anti-Israel' Stance

B

Yeah, I think that's right. I think what you highlighted is so important that they are much more against the US relationship with Israel than Israel itself. If Israel continued to function as like an apartheid segregated ethnostate. I don't think Tucker would have a problem as long as our money was not going towards it.

I actually have a clip that explains just that. Uh I watched yesterday the two-hour conversation between Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes. So the fact that I am still here to talk to all of you. Is a miracle. Let's watch this clip where Tucker explains how he's quote, always thought he has the most moderate view on Israel.

H

I've always thought I have the most world's most moderate position on Israel. Don't hate Israel. Just don't want to get involved in their wars. Don't want to pay for this. Don't want to pay for abortion on demand in a foreign country. Sorry. When we're cutting food stamps on our own, like that's outrageous. It's not America first.

B

So I think that illustrates what I'm saying pretty clearly.

A

I think it's important to understand that that also doesn't preclude being anti Semitic and that there's a long history of fascists supporting Israel because they think that that's actually where all Jews belong. that they can have their ethno ethnostate so that we can have our ethnostate, uh you know, our pure ethnostate. But also that dumping all of the ills of capitalism onto a Jewish elite is a is a very old trick and a very useful one in terms of protecting capitalism.

So in times of crisis, when people are starting to ask deeper questions about an economic model that is screwing them over on a profound level. Like I don't think it's just going to be left at, well, let's just let Israel be Israel. I think it will go beyond that because it's too useful.

in terms of protecting like the other thing on your chart, right? That it's a pretty pro billionaire movement, right? And, you know, think about T Tucker's relationship with Elon Musk, you know, when he lost his Fox show. Elon was his lifeline. He let him broadcast from X. He was just quoting him the other day on the show about how Elon says that the US is I think it was him or maybe it was his guest that the I th but I actually think it was I I think it was Carlson saying

that the US was turning into South Africa. And Tucker talked about people being necklaced, which is a a a reference in South Africa to the during apartheid, people would get burning tires put around their neck as a form of tor torture and um murder. So he was raising that prospect and invoking Elon. So the richest man in the world. I mean this is a populist, right?

I mean he also somebody who who will talk about how much of a libertarian he is and how like during COVID, how opposed he was to vaccine, you know, talk about vaccine mandates being authoritarianism and vaccine verification apps being authoritarianism. I haven't heard him say anything. against what Palantir is doing, what his friend E Elon did when he was running Doge and sent in people to hoover up Americans personal uh data and use it to train AI or whatever they're doing.

I mean these are the most extreme violations of the most basic civil liberties, including, you know, what happened in Minneapolis. He may have been critical of what happened to Alex Predi, but I didn't hear him say anything about people being stopped on the street because of the the accent they had or how they looked.

And then having, you know, their doors kicked down, right? So simply to say he has said very little about Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, it's very dangerous. It's a very dangerous person to make an alliance.

Christian Nationalism, Not Decolonial Anti-Zionism

B

And like Tucker Carlson, among a lot of other things, he supported gutting USAID, which Elon did with Doge, and he supported gutting USAID. USAID for the same reason, I would argue, that he is broadly anti-Israel, which is that he just thinks that US money shouldn't go anywhere except The US. Like you know, one might ask of Tucker Carlson, why is one of the United States' most prominent critics of Israel not organizing for Palestine?

Not raising money for Palestine, not doing anything for Palestine, except sort of the occasional opining against Israel with increasingly fringe members of the American far right. And it's because he's not an anti-Zionist. And and and I'm not trying to be like pedantic by saying that. Anti-Zionism is a decolonial movement centered around the human rights of Palestinians. Tucker Carlson is a nativist and a white Christian supremacist.

who thinks that American Zionists' support for Israel threatens their allegiance to the United States, which is the only allegiance they should have.

A

Mm-hmm.

H

The reality of a multi ethnic country requires you to sort of set aside community or group interests in favor of national interests. And you have to do that or else it doesn't work. I don't think well I'll speak for myself. I'm I don't feel like I'm at war with the neocons or Israel. It's much bigger than that. It's like you want to restore America. To a place where your grandchildren would enjoy growing up. That's it. Yeah.

B

He might be, you know, slightly concerned about the genocide in Gaza, but not enough to like do anything material about it or like advocate for Palestinians, which he doesn't.

A

I mean he got he started to get concerned when churches were targeted.

B

And that tells you everything. Everything that he only started caring about, like the genocide, really, and talking about it when churches in Gaza were targets.

Tucker's Critique of Christian Zionist Support

H

On Sunday, one of the weirdest images of recent times, and there are a lot of weird images, appeared on the internet. It appeared to show an Israeli soldier, an IDF soldier, using a sledgehammer to smash the face of a

F

Of

H

A statue of Jesus. So then you think, Well, this just can't be real. And of course, that's what they told you right off the bat. This is not real. But very quickly it emerged, No. This actually was real. Why would an Israeli soldier want to smash the face of Jesus? This is a country, we're often told, that is a safe haven for Christians in the region. How free are Christians to practice Christianity in Israel? American Christians need to reassess their support for Israel.

B

And like so the genocide, it might be a secondary concern of Tucker's or even a tertiary concern, but his main concern is the opposite of humanitarian.

A

Yeah. The point I just was making before w I got distracted around, you know, whether or not he's running for president or whether what role he's gonna play in the next e electoral cycle or the next few electoral cycles. It's simply that people should remember that when that that when politicians are cobbling together an electoral coalition.

They say all kinds of things they don't believe or signal all kinds of things they don't believe. Trump did that with Latino voters. He did that with sort of maha moms, right? He put together the coalition that it would take to win.

And I think that the kinds of little uh signals that people on the left are starting to get and like from Tucker Carlson should be viewed with a similar skepticism that they are trying to cobble together some kind of a of an electoral coalition and believe that maybe he's really, you know, anti-war in the same way that they convince themselves that Trump was anti-war.

B

Uh-huh.

A

Or pro Palestine as you're

B

A another thing that Tucker says a lot is that Trump is controlled by Israel. This is sort of one of his central critiques of Israel. And I wonder what you make of that.

A

I mean, I think it's a story that exonerates US power, right? I I think anybody on the left who's aligning themselves with an ideology of American firstism should think hard about the role of US foreign policy in the world and what it means to say that actually it's been, you know, Israel all along that is responsible for everything.

violent and immiserating that US policy has done. You know, the left response to this has to be internationalism. That's what the left is supposed to be so supposed to believe, which is the antithesis of Amer you know, any kind of exclusionary nationalism. calling itself America First or Christian nationalism or but especially American nationalism because of the blood on the hands of US foreign policy.

So yeah, it's a kind of a cleansing. It's a c you know, I think he's kind of cleansing capitalism and he's cleansing the United States of all of its misdeeds. That's the project that is underway.

Dual Loyalty and Christian Zionist Divide

B

A hundred percent. And you know, I was just explaining like one of Tucker Carlson's big critiques of Israel is that it's like People who have like American Zionists who have dual loyalty to Israel. They're like sort of breaking apart the American nationalists. project. And I want to mention here where someone like Nick Fuentes takes that a step further or at least is more explicit, is Nick Fuentes will say this is a Jewish problem.

Because he believes that Jews represent a unique threat to American Christian nationalism because they have an ethno-religious obligation to Israel. They Nick someone like Nick Fuentes believes that Jews, because they are Jews, are allegiant to Israel, therefore they are, if they're in the diaspora, if they're in the United States, they are undermining sort of the American nationalism that should exist totally and completely.

within the United States. And so he does that sort of sleight of hand where this is actually a Jewish problem.

F

idea that neoconservatism and in Israel has nothing to do with Jewishness, Jewish identity, the Jewish religion.

Because

F

Clearly, the state of Israel and the neocons are deeply motivated by that ethnic identity. And their allegiance to Israel proceeds from that. There's like a natural affinity that Jews have for Israel.

B

And he will say that to someone like Tucker Carlson virtually unchallenged. I wanna also mention, insofar as Tucker Carlson is tactically useful in the short term. I was talking, I was talking with my Palestinian friend about this, and he mentioned, you know, like the largest pro-Israel coalition in the United States is the Christian Zionist base.

There are more Christian Zionists in the US than there are Jews anywhere. And so like the the one Sprinkle of credit I can give to Tucker Carlson, again, only on a tactical level, is that he is probably breaking apart that coalition.

The Peril of Messianic Zionism

A

Yeah, and I think coming back to what we were talking about earlier. This could be good. Like it it just depends on whether there is a left that can take advantage of that splintering, right? Um it's it's very important to break apart that coalition. I mean, that's something else that he's done very well on the show. You know, some people want to argue that this just it's just anti Semitic to even talk about this.

Is that there's an increasingly powerful block inside Israel that really wants to rebuild the third temple where Al-Aqsa is. And he had, as I said, Avram Berg, former Speaker of the House, uh uh, on the show talking about how powerful this block is, you know, represented by Ben Gavir and Smotrich.

B

Sort of like the greater Israel people.

A

I mean they're beyond Greater Israel. They want Greater Israel is only a piece of it. What they're they're Messianic Zionists. This is where Christian Zionism and Jewish Messianic Zionism come together. In their own strategic alliance, right? Because in the Christian version of this story, you need all the Jews to go back to Israel to

occupy the biblical lands that was promised by God to Abraham in the covenant. And this is what Tucker Carlson was talking about with Ted Cruz, right? Like this is all part of breaking apart this story. So you sub in the promise to Abraham, and then you say, well, that's a promise to the Israelites, and then you say, that's a promise to modern day Israel.

B

Once we start getting into the Bible of it all, I like have such a hard

A

God is a real estate agent. I listen, I have been studying this now for more than a year and I I always say to my friends like I'm getting stupider. Like the more I learn, the dumber I get. Like I used to feel smart when I did research, and now I'm just like, what

B

It's so hocus pocus.

A

need to continue. So once you yeah, did you ever watch any of the left behind movies? The left behind movies? No. This is the rapture. This is the story of the rapture.

B

I know a little bit about like did Christian Zionists want the Jews to go to Israel so that like they can be saved and all the Jews can like burn in hell or something.

A

That's basically the story. So but so a certain things need to happen in order for th those conditions to be met. So you have to Jews have to go to Israel and then they have to rebuild the third temple.

And and then there's a whole battle with the Antichrist, et cetera. Some Jews will convert and they'll also be saved. Faithful Christians will be saved. Everybody else will burn in hell. This is why I say it's it's a real strategic alliance because you're making an alliance with people who want you to burn in hell.

Um, because the Jewish messianic version of this story is that you rebuild the temple and the messianic age begins. So it's not Jesus' return. They're both messianic stories. One group thinks it's a return, the other group thinks it's happening for the first time. But they are agreeing to collaborate on the basics and they are deferring the big question about who burns in hell.

um until later. Okay. So that's the alliance and and and it's an incredibly damaging alliance. And this group is not the dominant group in Israel, but they don't have to be dominant in order to do some very, very destructive things. You know, October seventh the name of the operation was was Operation Al Aqsa Flood. And the reason why it was named that is because there had been so mu so many aggressive incursions onto Alaksa and so many things had happened to try to

Bring them closer to the fulfilling of this prophecy. Then we get into things like red heifers, importing them from Texas to the United States to Israel. It's very, very this is what I'm saying. Like my brain has deteriorated.

B

Literally about to say your your poor brain. Oh my god.

A

Okay, but the thing is it's like, you know, I have a line in Doppelganger um quoting Philip Ross saying it's too ridiculous to take seriously and too serious to be ridiculous. And I feel like that is the slogan of our age because it is it is so ridiculous that you want to ignore it, but it's too serious to be ridiculous because there are people with power who used to be quite marginal. Now, you know, they have positions in the Israeli government that put them in charge of the whole police.

This is why it matters that he ha that tu that Carlson will interview Mike Huckabee, who is the ambassador US ambassador to Israel, who says, I basically agree with this story and he's a Christian Zionist. So It is important to break apart this coalition. It is an incredibly damaging and dangerous coalition between US evangelicals and um messianic Zionists and settlers. There's a whole industry that brings people from their mega churches in the United States.

to go walk in Jesus' footsteps and go to legal settlements, develop relationships, volunteer, give money. It's a huge industry and it does matter that people are trying to break it apart. They're breaking it apart so that everybody can have their own fortressed ethno-national estates and they can do their own ethnic cleansing in the United States.

So we should not lose sight of that. But if there was a functional, organized, strategic left in this country, they would use this opportunity, we would use this opportunity to say, okay, we actually want to build a different kind of world rooted in universal rights and international law and solidarity and things like universal health care and a higher minimum wage and things that are gonna make people's lives and abolish billionaires. I mean there's a lot of things that we know we need to do.

Blueland Sponsor Read

Um and this is, can we talk about AOC for a minute?

B

Yeah, yes, yes, yes, do it, do it.

A

Right, you you you you you set it up the way you want to do it. I know I went on for a long time and I got to the red heifers which I shouldn't have, you know? But look, there are people who go on podcasts shaking little bits of ash of burned red cows in America, you know? Huge podcast of millions of listeners.

B

Next time we do this, you have to tell me which like religious props to bring.

A

Do bring a dime bag of ashes.

B

Later you'll explain to me why. Okay. I'd like to take a quick break from the show to give a shout out to Blueland for sponsoring today's episode. Plastic, as you might be aware, doesn't just disappear, it breaks down into smaller and smaller and smaller pieces of what you might know as microplastics that stay in our environments, in our homes, all around us. Blue Land is a home cleaning company that is taking the microplastics out of the products you use every day to clean your

Blue Land makes dish, laundry, and basically every home cleaning product that you can think of or need, designed with eliminating single-use plastic in mind. And Blue Land is used in over a million homes. Including mine. The idea is simple. You buy one of their forever bottles, beautifully designed.

Beautiful to look at, unlike most cleaning products, dare I say. You pop in a tablet and some water to make whatever cleaning solution it is that you're going for, whether it's mirror cleaner, multi-purpose cleaner, you name it, and you're all set. And once you get to the bottom of that bottle, you can just refill it with water and pop in a new tablet. And those refill tablets start at just$2.25 a pop.

So not only better for the planet, but also better for your wallet. If you would like to try Blue Land today, you can get 15% off your first order at blueland.com slash fruity. That is blueland.com. slash fruity. Thank you so much to Blue Land as always for sponsoring this show. And now let's get back to the

AOC's Distrust of Marjorie Taylor Greene

In preparing for this episode, Naomi was like, I really want to talk about the AOC Marjorie Taylor Green beef. And so here it is. This is the AOC MTG interlude. Bop bop bow. AOC was recently speaking at an event where she was asked about working across the aisle with political adversaries, where she said this.

D

I care about results. Now there are certain places where certain areas where I don't think That we should ignore. Some folks' record on some of these issues, right? we trust intent where we trust where those outcomes are going. I personally Do not trust someone like Marjorie Taylor Green, a proven bigot and anti Semite, on the issues of what is good for Gazans and Israelis.

A

Yes.

B

Thank you. Thank you.

A

I don't think that it's a little bit more than a little bit

D

benefits our movement in that instance to align the left with white nationalists. I don't think it serves us. And so I think it's about looking at The context, the place, the results, the outcomes, intentions, and where we think that train would go.

B

Now, this comment and the discourse that ensued will keep the lights on at Blue Sky for some time. Marjorie Taylor Green is, if you're out of the loop, someone who was elected to the House of Representatives in 2021 as sort of a Trump sycophant. And perhaps his strongest soldier, and over the last year became vocally disillusioned with Trump's cover-up of the Epstein files.

and unwavering support for Israel, which she repeatedly called Miga or Make Israel Great Again. That's kind of their anti-MAGA slur. Yeah, Miga. She was like, That's Miga, not MAGA. Uh, Marjorie Taylor Green resigned from government in January after Trump began lashing out at her, saying that uh she didn't want to make her family. Endure the abuse. This led to a lot of hot takes. And Naomi Klein, let's hear yours. Just kidding. It doesn't have to be a hot take. It doesn't have to be a hot take.

Defending AOC's Record and Strategy

A

Yeah, I I mean I don't particularly want to weigh in on the whether or not to trust Marjorie Taylor Green or not. You know, I think I've said before, she's been on a journey. I don't know her. I don't know exactly what she believes.

B

It's also just like a moot point in my opinion,'cause it's like she's not in the government anymore. But sorry, continue. Yeah.

A

Yeah. And I think she wanted to run for the Senate in Georgia. I you know, I don't know. But I do do know that unlike some of the people we've been talking about, she does talk about the corruption within the Trump administration, like that just the unbelievable level of self enrichment and donors and so on.

Um, she occasionally gets it right. No, I I think the thing that really bothered me about the reaction was all were all these people saying like Marjorie Taylor Green is so much more courageous. than AOC and yeah. And she sacrificed her whole political career for her beliefs.

B

Ja. Sorry, I don't mean to cut you off. I I I'm with you. I'm with you. That that was the line, right? J like Marjorie Taylor Green sacrificed her political career to like stand up for what she thought was right. I just want to say Marjorie Taylor Green did not sacrifice her political career. She quit. As soon as her views shifted and she would have had any leverage to actually enact change according to her new views.

A

Yeah. And I I I think it's politically smart within Ma MAGA to see that the sort of Trump train is crashing and there's gonna be another wave and we'll see what she does, right? Um, but being able to be like I was one of the courageous ones, you know, if you're running in kind of a purple state is not a bad thing to be. So we'll see.

No, I think what what bothered me about it is even though I think that AOC has made some big mistakes on on Israel, you know, everybody was quoting the the convention speech and the working tirelessly for for for a ceasefire was bad.

B

Yeah, she she carried water for Kamala's line about like we're working tirelessly for a ceasefire.

D

In Kamala Harris, we have a chance to elect a president who is for the middle class because she is from the middle class.

A

Yeah.

D

She is working tirelessly. To secure a ceasefire in Gaza.

B

That was not true.

A

I think she was she was in her mode of w you know, which is a mode that Bernie gets into as well of just like doing everything we we need to stop Trump, you know. And looking at the way the world works now, you can see why people get into that mode, but it doesn't forgive a line like that in the middle of a genocide and in in in the context of a convention where Palestinians were being blocked from from even having a speaker.

So this is not to say that that that things like that haven't happened, but you know, AOC added her name to the first ceasefire resolution that was introduced by Corey Bush and Rashida Talib, she signed it on October 18th. So this idea that she's taken no risk. That was a big political risk at the time. That was when Marjorie Taylor Green was standing with Israel and, you know, and and it was, I mean, I was in Washington for that JVP rally. Um, I don't know if you were there.

B

Were you there? In twenty twenty three.

A

Yeah.

B

Naomi, I honestly wasn't not only was I not there, like I wasn't there yet.

A

Yeah, I mean

B

Yeah. Which I think is important to name. Like my political evolution happened in the wake of October seventh and I I I was not there yet.

A

No, and you know, Bernie wasn't there yet. I mean it would be six months before Rokana called for a ceasefire. It w she was early. So I'm just saying that. I just wanna say because a lot of people have been lying. She was early and sh d she did take some risks and she also, you know, was The the the the voice of the Green New Deal in Congress. And that is the kind of a vision that we actually need to get us out of this fascist house of mirrors that we're in right now.

And she has been on the road with Bernie calling out oligarchy and she has been taking on the tech tech giants. And I said, I think she's made mistakes over the years. You know, I Don't think she should have gone through the met ball, you know, things like that, right? Yeah. And I think people have a right to be critical and hold her accountable. But the idea that the left is in a better situation

tearing down someone like AOC and trying to obliterate her entire record, you know, I think is doing the right s work for them. And and so that's what bothered me about the exchange.

Solidarity vs. Warring Ethnostates

You know, I I have been opposed to Zionism for, you know, most of my life. Not all of my life,'cause I did I was exposed as a as as a kid and a teenager to the indoctrination and you know I went I went to a Jewish day school and it's important to to know the story to know the appeal and the appeal is we were weak now we are strong

the story is a hideous story, you know, and my friend Molly Crabapple has been so eloquent in her you know, when she talks about the Jewish Labor Bund and in her marvelous Book about the boon here where we live as our country, about the grotesque ways that Zionists. have blamed European Jews for their own genocide in this language of like lambs to the slaughter or even when Netanyahu spoke to Congress.

I forget, I mean he's done it so many times, but it was a a couple of years ago, I think it was still the Biden administration, where he said, you know, we'll never be l walk like lambs to the slaughter again. Or, you know, it was a clip like that, maybe you can find it.

J

Far from being lambs led to the slaughter. Israel's soldiers have fought back with incredible courage.

A

Reiterating this idea of blaming the victims and the story that m that Molly tells in the book is really that it was a failure of solidarity on every level. Um, it was a failure of, you know, multiracial movements to stick together and um and also failures of solidarity in the United States and Canada and all the countries that that shut their doors to to Jews um so that Palestine seemed to be the only safe place, right?

But this story of we were weak now we are strong is part of what justified alliances, Zionist alliances, with anti-Semitic fascists. in the interest of the the Israeli state. So this story, I mean I was s saying before, this is an old story of like when solidarity fails. You find your bully, right? I mean, you even think about it in a kind of schoolyard context. How do you protect yourself when you're vulnerable? You find your you're a tough guy, you know?

And so it really is solidarity, multiracial democracy. We're all you know, we all keep each other safe. Or a world of warring ethnostates where everybody finds their finds their fascist, finds their bully. I mean, these are the choices ahead of us.

Anticipating Post-Trump Fascism

B

Hmm. also with respect to Marjorie Taylor Green, just want to point out that like it's not even really a transformation. Marjorie Taylor Green isn't uh necessarily a groper. I think she would probably say she's like too old for that. She's graper adjacent in her politics and even in her opposition to Israel. I mean, she she's a little better than some of the others. She does seem to have a genuine humanitarian concern.

for the genocide on Gaza. She's you know, and the fact that the liberal establishment has left, as you said, the lane wide open for her to be the person talking about that on CNN is

A

Insane.

B

Horrifying, but she's still extremely anti-immigrant. She's still anti-vaccine. I think she's on Twitter right now recommending like ivermectin for the Henta Hunt Hunta virus. She is very anti-abortion, very anti-trans in her resignation letter. She was like, I join this to get the men out of women's sports. You know, it's

A

It's like she's also very proud of her work with Doge and says that, you know, that things started to go bad when they didn't go far enough with Doge.

B

Mm. So I think we're sensing a pattern among these people that it's like These beliefs that have the aesthetic of some sort of thing that looks like some of what we practice on the left are not. And uh, you know, as recently as last summer when Zoran won the primary, Marjorie Taylor Greene posted, did you see this? She posted an AI-generated image of the Statue of Liberty covered in like a burqa.

A

Yeah, I I think you're right what you said before that why are we talking about her? She's not she's she's not in politics right now. She's now an influencer. We can't read her mind. You know, she said some good stuff. She said some absolutely atrocious stuff. Why would we speculate about whether she's really changed or not changed?

It's a waste of time. One thing that I think I think is clear is that there's gonna be something after Trump. There are gonna be people who are gonna try to fill this. vacuum. And they're going to try to fill it by saying, we are not going to do the things that hurt you that Donald Trump did, right? And because that's just smart politics. So it will be a kind of an anti-Epstein class post-MAGA MAGA.

And I think that we can anticipate that they will be talking much more specifically about being anti-corruption because there has been so much corruption in this administration. um it's absolutely unprecedented the the the looting that's going on. So they will have to be claimed to be anti corruption. And I think that the other thing that's really struck

you know, Astra and I as we've been doing this research about what makes this fascism different than it's like a Passover question. Why is this fascism different than all other fascisms? And one of the things is that it has not offered really anything but vicarious cruelty to its base, right? And not to get nostalgic for Mussolini, but That's the part they'll clip. That's the part of that clip.

B

Um

A

There's no there there is no nostalgia for 20th century fascism, but it was a kind of affordist fascism that had an offer to its base. If you were part of the in-group, you got material benefits, right? It wasn't all memes. You got like a nice home that they stole from the Jews or the Slavs, right? Um you got social programs, you got big public works, whether we're talking about Franco, Mussolini, or Hitler.

B

I mean look at even what Israel by their land theft has given Israelis.

A

And that's what Tucker's mad about, right? That's what made me think about it, right? It made me realize that I think that the next stage of this will make more serious social welfare offers, right? And that will be called a bipartisan coalition because we'll all agree, right? It'll seem like we can agree. We agree that Israel is a genocidal state and we also agree that people should have health care and social security. And it's gonna be really important to understand this history.

um that that is not the coalition that we need to make. What we need is actually to have a genuine left offer that doesn't throw anyone out. And that's what what what Mamdani has showed. can work you know in the context of a city and it can also work in the context of a country. That's where where Marjorie Taylor Green and Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes are headed. And we should be ready for it because people are going to try to tell us it's progressive and it's not, it's fashion.

Liberal Failures Empower the Far Right

B

Could I play you one more video to react to?

A

I just

B

want to really make light of something that we've mentioned, which is the way that like liberal Zionist institutions have paved the way for Tucker's rise and Nick Fuentes's rise and Marjorie Taylor Green to look like a reasonable person. And I think nothing uh represents that better than this viral clip from an interview that Tucker did with the editor-in-chief of The Economist, wherein she asks him the following.

A

Do you

E

are critical of the government of Israel. Do you believe in the Israel's right to exist? Would you consider yourself a Zionist in that narrow definition? The existence of the political state of Israel as it is.

H

It has a right, what does that mean?

E

But you don't d you think it should continue in its existence as a state right now. So you you are the you do not agree with the state.

A

the rod.

E

For example.

H

Well let me just ask since you asked me the question it's fair for me to get you to define the term so I can answer You've asked two questions. The first was, do you believe Israel is a right to exist? And the second question was, do you believe Israel should continue to go on as a nation? And those are very different questions. So I often hear that.

E

Having been created as a political entity in nineteen forty eight, does that state

H

To exist. Is that what you're asking?

E

Should it continue to exist? That's what that's how I define narrowly designed.

H

Because the phrase you used was devised by the Israeli government. Of course. Does it have a right to exist? And so my question to you would be, what is that? What's your question is? exist or do I want it to exist? Do I seek its destruction?

E

Fine, answer it that way.

H

Well of course I don't seek its destruction. I've already said, as you know, because I said it to you, I don't want Israel to be destroyed or how

B

Actually.

A

We've we've got to do that.

E

We've established that you are in that narrow terms of Zionism.

H

I am in no sense a Zionist. I don't want any country to be destroyed and I d at all, and I don't want people to die, particularly ones who committed no crime, because I don't believe in killing innocents. Period. That's the basis of Western civilization. Eastern civilizations with a whole different view, they believe in collective punishment, I don't.

E

So you're no senses on.

H

I don't even know what that means. Why don't you ask define the the term and then I'll tell you whether I am?

E

Find it.

A

What's his idea?

E

A Zionist in my narrow term, this definition is that the state of Israel, the political state of Israel, has the right to continue existing.

H

The right. Where does that right come from? What what do you mean? These are like I'm not being a lawyer about it. I just want to know what you're asking.

A

Good job.

E

Yeah.

H

I don't know what you're asking. No, no, no, I think it's a lot. You don't want to define your question. And I don't know why.

B

I mean, insane Tucker Carlson laugh aside, he's running laps around this person. She can't be honest what she means about things like Zionism or the right to exist or whatever.

A

Mm-hmm. Yeah, and he said that's what s Western civilization stands for. Like that was one of the things that stood out to me. That Western civilization stands for that. I mean there's I'm not so sure it does. Like I'm not so sure that that's what the history of Western civilization Shows us because genocide has been committed in the name of Western civilization many times. And what he's actually describing is

Is universal human rights and international law. And I would like to ask Tucker Carlson if he believes they have a right to exist.

B

Yeah.

A

I wanna ask him if he thinks the UN has a right to exist. You know, the genocide convention is a product. post-Second World War II infrastructure that was a response to genocide committed in the name of Western civilization, in the name of Western values, against pollutants. So yeah, he can run lab.

around her and everybody can be thrilled with it. But I liked Mamdani's answer to that question better when he said, I believe in international law and every state should abide by it. And if they abide by it, then they should exist. Um, which was A a a better way of getting around that gotcha question. And there's lots of different ways, but I think people are so sick and tired of it that anytime anyone stands up to it, um, it's gonna go viral and you know that's

That's what happened.

B

Yeah, and and I don't say that he's running laps around her to like do some crazy Tucker Carlson praise. I think it's very easy, uh like you said, to just get around this question with like a normal answer of like I believe in international law.

A

States don't have rights. Yeah, there's lots of ways to get around it.

B

Yes, fr uh Francesca Albanese Albanese has also done an incredible an incredible answer to this. So has Tanahasse Coates, ones that are based in human rights framework. But what kills me, what drives me crazy as someone on the left, is that the dishonesty.

Oh, yeah.

B

these institutions that are like sort of like Zionist first because they are whatever, allegiant to these systems and capital and all of that other stuff. They have left the lane wide open for these people to swoop in and look like the rational ones in the situation. When as we've described over this episode, they are leading people to a much worse place. You know, if you look at what someone like Nick Fuentes believes,

Which as I've explained is that like Jews are Israel, Jews support for Israel is downstream of their ethnicity. It is inherent and it is therefore a danger to the uh American nationalism because they have dual loyalty, whatever, whatever, whatever.

Conflation's Dangerous Consequences

W when he says that this is a Jewish issue. and that Zionism is a Jewish issue. He's speaking the same language as all of these sort of like ardent, staunch Zionist defenders at these institutions, Zionists like those at the ADL, Jonathan Greenblatt, who I've covered on this podcast. or at the New York Times, or Jake Tapper and Dana Bash at CNN, who I would argue have done more than almost anyone to assist the rise of figures like Fuentes, Tucker, Candace, and the like.

By insisting on these falsehoods and these conflations and their sort of undemocratic attempts to silence any dissent, especially within liberal circles. And like this is what drives me crazy is I feel like these people have made the rise of a Fuentes or a Tucker inevitable. You know?

A

I think they have. I think this has been a a group project and I you know, we like we are more than two and a half years into a genocide. that coalitions of the left have failed to stop. And I think we are now in a moment where people are looking around, going Are there other alliances we can make? That might be and and I think from the beginning there have been people who who who have had that perspective.

um that it's really about just finding strength. And like I said, Israel itself is a product of that kind of of thinking, right? And and this is what Molly gets at in her book so well. That the Zionists and the Bundists were at war because they had radically different visions of safety, right? The Bundist idea of safety. was the safety and solidarity and transforming the world wherever we live in multiracial alliance.

with other working people, with other working class people. And the Zionist vision was a was a fortress. Vision in alliance with powerful imperial actors. So yeah, we've been brought to a really bleak place. I think that we need to double down in our work as anti-Zionist Jews, in and that that work is disentangling Judaism from Zionism, because that fusion of faith and nationalism is incredibly dangerous.

It's also dangerous in the United States, which is what Tucker Carlson is doing. It's a fusion of Christianity and Americanness. nuclear powered, you know, by any means necessary. So there are alliances to be made with People of faith who are Christian who are trying to disentangle their faith from what JD Vance is trying to do with it, right? I think the Pope is trying to do it. You know, I think there's I think there are interesting alliances that we should be making.

There some of them are are are tricky and unexpected. Like I don't think we should be just looking for people who agree with us on everything. Yeah. But I don't think we should be making alliances like I don't think we should be trying to take on one form of supremacist ethno-nationalism by making alliances with people who believe in another one, because I don't think that's gonna end well.

But you're absolutely right to point out that we would not be here if that vacuum wasn't created by the Democrats, if Zionism hadn't fused Judaism with an ethnostate and then people like Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson say, Well you're the ones who said, you know, you're the ones who said Judaism is Israel.

So we have a lot of work to do. And I th th I think what what worries me is that, you know, when people make a l alliances with anti Semites, you know, I I worry that people who have been, you know, part of the anti Zionist Jewish organizing world will will sort of start to turn away and

I think that that would be a mistake because I think that there are lots of people who are trying to do politics differently. And like Abdul Al Saeed on in in Michigan, the campaign he's building, I think there are a lot of candidates

Building the Left to Counter Fascism

Who are trying to forge another kind of politics. I think we should, you know, get out there and support them. It's not oblique. It's not oblique.

B

It's not all bleak. And, you know, j just to conclude, a lot of people do ask me there, you know, cause the the adage has always gone in these like mainstream Jewish institutions like the ADL, where they're like the best way that you can you know, s stand up against anti Semitism is like be louder about your support for Israel and like wear like more necklaces about it or whatever. I think like I I would really just like to argue again that like the best thing that

in my opinion, you can do to fight anti-Semitism is continue to fight this conflation. Because this conflation that people like again, like Dana Bash, continue to insist on every night on CNN. is the same conflation that Nick Fuentes is making when he's sitting down with Tucker Carlson. And it is that conflation that they are then using to justify what could be An extraordinarily f anti semitic future for the Republican Party.

That's like the most coherent I think I've ever felt in my entire life. Ha ha ha.

A

That was really good. It was really good. No, I mean I you know, I just I was just thinking and I was just thinking about how to say this because it's so fucking complicated, but thinking about the nineteen thirties in the United States. Um, you know, fascism was rising and figures like the ones we've been talking to, America Firstism was rising, and it was you know, a moment when the US could have gone could have gone fascist itself, right? Um

B

Mm-hmm.

A

And the U has gone fascist itself, right? I mean it's like this thing of could it happen here? It did happen. I mean, the Nazis learned studied the Jim Crow laws to write the Nuremberg laws. They didn't invent fascism, even if they gave it a proper name. Uh it existed in the colonies, it existed in under settler colonialism.

But that kind of capital F fascism could have come to the United States and there were lots of people who wanted it to. And they called themselves America First. And the only thing that really succeeded in defeating it. were programs that actually made peop Americans lives better. And the reason why I hesitate to like lift it up is that those like the New Deal

you know, those policies were white supremacist. I mean, they they they were segregated in the South. They discriminated against black people systematically. There were all kinds of professions that were excluded from New Deal protections because they were predominantly black sector. Huge numbers of jobs that were created under public works programs, under FDR, and the social protections that were created in the New Deal era are what kept the United States from turning into a

Country. And that is the only thing that will stop this tide that we've been talking about, which is why we shouldn't be tearing down left politicians. We should be challenging them and holding them accountable and holding them to high standards, but we should be building the left. that would be capable of winning that end more. Because it's the only thing that will stop it.

Concluding Thoughts and Future Hope

B

There's the optimism. All right. Naomi Klein Thank you so so much for being here today. It really it really is a dream uh and an honor. So thank you for allowing me to help you promote your book. Where can

A

We're gonna be back and talking about end times fascism um with Astra because my my brain is still a little bit the the book is still in its in its final stages, so There's this thing that happens like before it comes out where like we get really organized with our talking points and I'm not there yet. So forgive me for being a little rambler than usual. And please have me an Astroback to really blow your mind.

D

Yeah.

B

I can't wait. For now, where uh can people find more of you?

A

Oh. Um no, actually this is the only interview I've done. 'Cause we've been so locked down in the with the book. No, I I I um I don't know. I'm not really anywhere. I stopped posting on X.

B

Yeah.

A

Don't really understand Instagram as you know.

B

You're the first person who's answered this question with nowhere. You can find Naomi at the bookstore

A

I'm I'm platformless.

B

Yeah.

A

Ha ha

B

Well, I'm so grateful that you came here for this episode. I know it was like sort of like more advanced, complicated, like political unpacking of what's going on, but You know, sometimes we just have to do episodes like this. We can't always talk about celebrities, but uh in two weeks we probably will again. I love you so much. Thank you for listening today and until next time, stay fruity. That's my little outro.

🔇 Silence

This transcript was generated by Metacast using AI and may contain inaccuracies. Learn more about transcripts.
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android